Next Article in Journal
Protein Transduction Domain-Mediated Delivery of Recombinant Proteins and In Vitro Transcribed mRNAs for Protein Replacement Therapy of Human Severe Genetic Mitochondrial Disorders: The Case of Sco2 Deficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Guar Gum Hydrogel Containing Sesamol-Loaded Nanocapsules Designed for Irritant Contact Dermatitis Treatment Induced by Croton Oil Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Anti-Cancer Peptides as Immunomodulatory Agents: Potential and Design Strategy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Anti-Tubercular Aminolipopeptide Trichoderin A Displays Selective Toxicity against Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Cultured under Glucose Starvation

by
Johanes K. Kasim
1,2,
Jiwon Hong
1,2,3,4,
Anthony J. R. Hickey
1,2,
Anthony R. J. Phillips
1,2,3,4,
John A. Windsor
2,3,4,
Paul W. R. Harris
1,2,5,
Margaret A. Brimble
1,2,5 and
Iman Kavianinia
1,2,5,*
1
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
2
Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, The University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
3
Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, 22-30 Park Avenue, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
4
Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, 22-30 Park Avenue, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
5
School of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(1), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010287
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 14 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peptide-Based Drugs for Cancer Therapies)

Abstract

:
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a highly debilitating condition with no effective disease-modifying interventions. In our search for natural products with promising anticancer activity, we identified the aminolipopeptide trichoderin A as a potential candidate. While it was initially isolated as an antitubercular peptide, we provide evidence that it is also selectively toxic against BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells cultured under glucose deprivation. This has critical implications for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which is characterized by nutrient deprivation due to its hypovascularized network. We have also successfully simplified the trichoderin A peptide backbone, allowing greater accessibility to the peptide for further biological testing. In addition, we also conducted a preliminary investigation into the role of peptide lipidation at the N-terminus. This showed that analogues with longer fatty acyl chains exhibited superior cytotoxicity than those with shorter acyl chains. Further structural optimization of trichoderin A is anticipated to improve its biological activity, whilst ongoing mechanistic studies to elucidate its intracellular mechanism of action are conducted in parallel.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is a scourge of modern medicine, manifesting predominantly as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the clinic [1]. Despite a continual rise in incidence per annum, PDAC grimly remains without any disease-modifying interventions. This is attributed in part to its late diagnosis, such that most patients present with advanced-stage disease, rendering them ineligible for surgery as the primary intervention [2]. The underlying biology of PDAC is further complicated by a desmoplastic stromal compartment, which erects a physical barrier to drug delivery and an immunologically ‘cold’ tumor microenvironment (TME) [3]. However, its dichotomous nature also lends to the inefficient vascularization of the tumor bed. Consequently, cells proximal to the center of the tumour mass are deprived of both nutrient and oxygen supply (Figure 1). The effective management of PDAC therefore demands a combination of pharmaceutics that can address this inherent molecular heterogeneity [4].
Over the last decade, research in our group has focused on the synthesis and biological evaluation of aminolipopeptides as new generation anticancer therapeutics [7]. They are structurally defined by the α,α-dialkylated amino acid 2-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) and an acylated N-terminus. A subset of this family, containing the non-natural building block 2-amino-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-8-oxodecanoic acid (AHMOD), has provided two promising leads in leucinostatin A (1) and culicinin D (2). Leucinostatin A (1) was shown to be cytotoxic against DU-145 human prostate cancer cells in a coculture model with prostate stromal cells (PrSC). It was proposed that this peptide inhibited the transcription of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in PrSC, thereby inhibiting the proliferation of DU-145 [8]. Similarly, culicinin D (2) was selectively toxic against MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer cells, via the inhibition of the mTOR signaling pathway [9].
Another member of this family is the octameric peptide trichoderin A (3), first isolated by Kobayashi’s group from the marine sponge-derived Trichoderma sp. fungus, strain 05FI48 [10]. Follow-up mechanistic studies correlated its antitubercular activity by inhibition of ATP synthesis [11]. However, similarities in structure to leucinostatin A (1) and culicinin D (2) suggest its potential as an anticancer agent (Figure 2). We therefore sought to examine this hypothesis in the context of PDAC, toward the aim of advancing the collective understanding of the disease biology, in addition to evaluating the prospect of aminolipopeptides as oncotherapeutics more broadly. To this end, we report the synthesis of a simplified trichoderin A analogue (4), followed by a small library of its N-lipidated analogues (14)–(19). We also provide their in vitro cytotoxicity profile against two representative human PDAC cell lines BxPC-3 and PANC-1 [12].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All reagents purchased from commercial vendors were used without additional purification. N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA; ReagentPlus grade), piperidine, propionic acid, butanoic acid, hexanoic acid, octanoic acid, decanoic acid, dodecanoic acid, formic acid (LC-MS grade), acetic anhydride, N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, cell culture grade) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), and methanol (MeOH) were purchased from ECP Ltd. (Auckland, New Zealand). Milli-Q water (H2O) for RP-HPLC and LC-MS was obtained from the Sartorius Arium Pro ultrapure water production system (Gottingen, Germany). O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU) and ethyl-2-cyano-2-(hydroxyamino)acetate (Oxyma Pure) were purchased from Novabiochem (Darmstadt, Germany). 1-[(1-(Cyano-2-ethoxy-2-oxoethylideneaminooxy)-dimethylaminomorpholinomethylene)] methanaminium hexafluorophosphate (COMU) and 6-chloro-1-hydroxybenzotriazole (6-Cl-HOBt) were sourced from Aapptec (Louisville, KY, USA). HPLC and LC-MS grade acetonitrile (CH3CN) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was purchased from Oakwood Chemicals (Estill, SC, USA). 2-Chlorotrityl chloride (2-CTC) polystyrene resin, Fmoc-α-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib), Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Val-OH, and Fmoc-Pro-OH were purchased from CS Bio (Shanghai, China). Boc-Pro-OH was purchased from PolyPeptide Group (Zug, Switzerland). Fmoc-Cha-OH, and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) were purchased from AK Scientific (Union City, CA, USA). Leucinostatin A was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). Trichoderin A, (2R)-methyldecanoic acid (MDA), (2S,4S,6R)-2-amino-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-8-oxodecanoic acid (AHMOD) and (S)-2-(2-aminopropyl(methyl)amino)ethanol (AMAE) were synthesized in house as previously reported [13]. Nunc MicroWell 96-Well Black Optical-Bottom Plates with Polymer Base, PrestoBlue™ Cell Viability Reagent, CyQUANT™ Direct Cell Proliferation Assay, Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (ATCC Modification, #A1049101; 25 mM glucose), RPMI 1640 medium (#11879020; no glucose), Dulbecco’s Eagle Modified Medium (DMEM; high glucose, pyruvate, # 11995065; 25 mM glucose), DMEM (#11966025; no glucose), sodium pyruvate (100 mM), d-glucose solution (200 g/L), antibiotic–antimycotic (A/A), TrypLE™ Express Enzyme (1×) (phenol red, #12605010), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS, heat-inactivated) was purchased from Moregate Biotech (Hamilton, New Zealand).

2.2. General Procedure for Peptide Synthesis

The peptides were assembled manually by 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl/tert-butyl solid phase peptide synthesis (Fmoc/tBu SPPS) in a fritted glass reaction vessel.

2.2.1. (Method 1) Attachment of Fmoc-Aib-OH on Resin

A solution of Fmoc-Aib-OH (5 eq., 162.7 mg, 0.5 mmol) and DIPEA (10 eq., 172 µL, 1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added to 2-CTC resin (112.4 mg, 0.1 mmol; loading: 0.89 mmol/g) that has been preswollen in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) for 15 min. The reaction mixture was agitated for 6 h at room temperature, filtered, and repeated with fresh reagents for a further 6 h. Excess solvent was then filtered, and the resin bed treated with a mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH/DIPEA (8:1.5:0.5, v/v/v, 3 mL) for 15 min at room temperature to cap unreacted chlorides on the resin.

2.2.2. (Method 2) Spectrophotometric Quantitation of First Residue Loading on Resin

Loading of the first residue on resin was quantified on the Shimadzu UV-1280 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). Resin that has been dried under vacuum was weighed into a Starna Scientific 10-mm matched silica UV spectrophotometric cuvette (Ilford, UK). 20% piperidine/DMF (v/v, 3 mL) was dispensed into the cuvette, briefly agitated with a pipettor to achieve a uniform suspension, then left for 5 min at room temperature. A reference cuvette, containing only 20% piperidine/DMF (v/v, 3 mL), was used to zero the spectrophotometer at the wavelength of 290 nm. The absorbance of the resin-containing cuvette was recorded as an average of three independent measurements, and the loading of the first residue calculated by the following Equation (1):
Loading = Absorbance Resin   mass × 1.75
Equation (1) estimation of first residue attachment on resin. Loading is measured in mmol/g.

2.2.3. (Method 3) Removal of Fmoc Protecting Group

A solution of 20% piperidine/DMF (v/v, 3 mL) was added to the peptidyl resin to remove the Fmoc protecting group. The reaction mixture was agitated for 5 min at room temperature, filtered, and the reaction repeated with fresh reagents for a further 10 min. Excess solvent was then filtered, and the resin bed washed with DMF (3 × 3 mL).

2.2.4. (Method 4) Procedure for the Difficult Sequential Aib-Aib Coupling on Resin

A solution of Fmoc-Aib-OH (5 eq., 162.7 mg, 0.5 mmol), COMU (5 eq., 214 mg, 0.5 mmol), Oxyma (5 eq., 71 mg, 0.5 mmol) and DIPEA (10 eq., 172 µL, 1 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was added to the peptidyl resin (0.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was agitated for 2 h at room temperature, filtered, and the reaction repeated with fresh reagents for a further 2 h. Excess solvent was then filtered and the resin bed washed with DMF (3 × 3 mL).

2.2.5. (Method 5) Coupling of Fmoc-Protected Amino Acid

A solution of the appropriate Fmoc-Aa-OH (5 eq., 0.5 mmol), HATU (4.9 eq., 186 mg, 0.49 mmol) and DIPEA (10 eq., 172 µL, 1 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was added to the peptidyl resin (0.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was agitated for 1 h at room temperature, filtered, and the reaction repeated with fresh reagents for a further 1 h. Excess solvent was then filtered, and the resin bed was washed with DMF (3 × 3 mL).

2.2.6. (Method 6) Attachment of N-Terminal Fatty Acid

A solution of the appropriate fatty acid (5 eq., 0.5 mmol), COMU (5 eq., 214 mg, 0.5 mmol), Oxyma (5 eq., 71 mg, 0.5 mmol) and DIPEA (10 eq., 172 µL, 1 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was added to the peptidyl resin (0.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was agitated for 3 h at room temperature. Excess solvent was then filtered, the resin bed washed with DMF (3 × 3 mL) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 3 mL), then dried under vacuum.

2.2.7. (Method 7) HFIP-Mediated Resin Cleavage

The resin bed was treated with 20% HFIP/CH2Cl2 (v/v, 5 mL) to release the completed peptide chain. The reaction mixture was agitated for 30 min at room temperature, filtered, and the reaction repeated with fresh reagents for a further 30 min. The collected filtrate was partially concentrated under a gentle stream of nitrogen, reconstituted in CH3CN/H2O (v/v, 10 mL) and lyophilized.

2.2.8. (Method 8) Late-Stage Solution Phase C-Terminal Coupling of AMAE

The C-terminal AMAE residue was conjugated to the peptide as a TFA salt. A solution of AMAE.2TFA (3 eq.), DIC (6 eq.), 6-Cl-HOBt (6 eq.), and DIPEA (6 eq.) in DMF was added to the purified peptide from Method 7. The reaction mixture was agitated for 12 h at room temperature and completion of the reaction was monitored by analytical RP-HPLC and ESI-MS. The peptide mixture was then purified batchwise by semipreparative RP-HPLC.

2.2.9. LC-MS Analysis of Purified Peptides

LC-MS spectra were acquired on an Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 1260 Infinity LC equipped with an Agilent Technologies 6120 Quadrupole mass spectrometer, using an Agilent C3 analytical column (150 mm × 3.0 mm, 3.5 µm) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1. A linear gradient of 5% to 95% B was used over 30 min (ca. 3% B min−1), where solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in H2O and B was 0.1% formic acid in CH3CN.

2.2.10. Semipreparative RP-HPLC Purification of Crude Peptides

Purification of the crude peptides by RP-HPLC was performed on a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA) Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC equipped with a four-channel UV Detector at 210, 225, 254, and 280 nm using a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) XTerra® MS C18 semipreparative column (10 × 250 mm, 5 µm) at a flow rate of 4 mL min−1. A linear gradient of 20% to 95% B was used over 75 min (ca. 1% B min−1), where solvent A was 0.1% TFA in H2O and solvent B was 0.1% TFA in CH3CN.

2.2.11. Analytical RP-HPLC of Purified Peptides

Analysis of the purified peptide fractions by RP-HPLC was performed on a Thermo Scientific Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC equipped with a four-channel UV Detector at 210, 225, 254, and 280 nm using a Waters XTerra® MS C18 analytical column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. A linear gradient of 5% to 95% B was used over 30 min (ca. 3% B min−1), where solvent A was 0.1% TFA in H2O and solvent B was 0.1% TFA in CH3CN. Fractions with the correct m/z as determined by ESI-MS were pooled and lyophilized.

2.3. Cell Culture

BxPC-3 (ATCC® CRL-1687™) and PANC-1 (ATCC® CRL-1469™) human PDAC cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). BxPC-3 was cultured in RPMI-1640 (ATCC Modification) supplemented with 10% FBS (v/v) and 1× A/A. PANC-1 was cultured in DMEM (high glucose, pyruvate) supplemented with 10% FBS (v/v) and 1× A/A. Both cell lines were maintained in culture at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and harvested at ~90% confluency using TrypLE Express and subcultured into a new flask at a splitting ratio of 1:6 (BxPC-3) or 1:4 (PANC-1). Culture medium was refreshed 2 times per week, and cell growth monitored daily under an inverted microscope.

2.4. Initial Cytotoxicity Assay: BxPC-3

The sensitivity of BxPC-3 cells to the native trichoderin A (3) and its simplified analogue (4) was examined under aerobic conditions in vitro by means of the orthogonal, fluorometric PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct Confirmation Assay [14]. BxPC-3 cells were seeded at a density of 7500 cells/well in Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) Nunc MicroWell 96-Well Black Optical-Bottom Plates with Polymer Base (total volume: 100 µL). Cells were first incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2 to allow for adherence, and then exposed to both peptides (3) and (4) in duplicate at a concentration range of 50.8 pM to 1 µM for 72 h (threefold serial dilution in RPMI-1640 (ATCC modification, 25 mM glucose; ten steps). At the end of this incubation step, 11 µL of PrestoBlue™ Cell Viability Reagent was added into each well, and the plates incubated for 10 min. The endpoint fluorescence was read from the bottom of the plate at an excitation/emission (Ex/Em) wavelength of 560/590 nm on a SpectraMax iD3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The CyQUANT™ Direct Cell Proliferation Assay was subsequently performed by mixing the CyQUANT™ Direct nucleic acid stain, CyQUANT™ Direct background suppressor I, and PBS (pH 7.4) as per the vendor instructions [15], then adding 100 µL of this mixture into each well. The plate was returned into the incubator for a further 1 h, and the endpoint fluorescence bottom-read at the Ex/Em wavelength of 485/538 nm on the SpectraMax iD3 plate reader. Blank wells (medium only) and two negative controls—(1) cells + medium, (2) cells + medium + 0.3% v/v DMSO (equivalent to 1 µM peptide)—were set up in the plate for each experiment.

2.5. Comparative Cytotoxicity Assay to Evaluate the Effect of Glucose on Cellular Proliferation: BxPC-3 and PANC-1

The sensitivity of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells to the native trichoderin A (3) and its analogues (4), (12)–(19) under low and normal glucose conditions was examined in parallel on the same plate using the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct Confirmation Assay. Cells were seeded at a density of 25,000 cells/well (BxPC-3) and 30,000 cells/well (PANC-1) in Nunc MicroWell 96-Well Black Optical-Bottom Plates with Polymer Base (total volume: 100 µL). Cells were first incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2 to permit adherence, after which the medium in each well was aspirated, briefly washed once with 100 µL/well of PBS (pH 7.4) and replaced with 100 µL of either RPMI 1640 (BxPC-3, #11879020) or DMEM (PANC-1, #11966025) supplemented with or without 5 mM glucose to create the ‘normal glucose’ and ‘low glucose’ media, respectively. This 5 mM glucose concentration was selected to reflect the physiological concentration of glucose in plasma [16]. Each well was then exposed to the peptides in duplicate at a concentration range of 50.8 pM to 1 µM (BxPC-3) or 457 pM to 9 µM (PANC-1) for 24 h (threefold serial dilution in the corresponding ‘normal glucose’ or ‘low glucose’ media, ten steps). Endpoint fluorescence was quantified as described above.

2.6. Data Analysis

Blank correction (wells containing medium only) was first performed on the raw fluorescence–concentration data from the plate reader. Cell viability was then calculated as a percentage by normalizing to the fluorescence of the wells containing the lowest drug concentration (50.8 pM for BxPC-3, 457 pM for PANC-1). The resulting data from three independent experiments (each in technical duplicate) was then plotted on GraphPad Prism 9 and analyzed using the built-in ‘[Inhibitor] vs. response—Variable slope (four parameters)’ equation. Cytotoxicity of each peptide reported in terms of:
  • IC50, corresponding to the drug concentration that gave half-maximal response (i.e., 50% viability)
  • AUC, corresponding to the calculated area under the curve with baseline set at y = 0 and the full concentration range used for both cell lines (i.e., 50.8 pM–9 µM).
  • Emax, corresponding to the maximal response achieved by the drug at the highest concentration used in the assay (i.e., 1 µM for BxPC-3, 9 µM for PANC-1).

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Synthesis of the Simplified Trichoderin A Analogue ( 4 )

The first total synthesis of trichoderin A (3) was reported by our group [13]. Within this work, the absolute stereochemistry of the C-6 atom of AHMOD was also revised to (R) from the initially reported (S) [10]. In a similar vein to culicinin D (2), the routine synthesis of trichoderin A (3) is also bottlenecked by the AHMOD building block, which preparation entails multiple complex reaction steps, and only afforded the desired product in abysmally low yields [17,18]. Thus, it was deemed necessary to identify a suitable replacement to AHMOD that would afford an equipotent analogue and concomitantly expedite the routine synthesis of the peptide for downstream biological studies. Fortuitously, in our preceding work with culicinin D (2), we have demonstrated that the replacement of AHMOD with l-cyclohexylalanine (Cha) produced such an analogue, as judged by its IC50 value from the sulphorhodamine B (SRB) assay against a panel of four human cancer cell lines: MDA-MB-468, SK-BR-3, T47D (breast), and NCI-H460 (lung) [19]. On this basis, we envisaged that this substitution would also be well-tolerated by trichoderin A (3), by virtue of its structural similarities to culicinin D (2).
To this end, we employed a hybrid solid-/solution-phase synthesis strategy that had proved successful for the preparation of the native trichoderin A (3) [13]. The synthesis commenced with the loading of Fmoc-Aib-OH on 2-chlorotrityl chloride (2-CTC) resin (loading: 0.89 mmol/g) (5) by Method 1 to give (6). Loading was quantified at 0.43 mmol/g by Method 2 (Scheme 1).
Following removal of the Fmoc temporary protecting group by Method 3, Fmoc-Aib-OH was coupled using Method 4 to generate the Aib-Aib dipeptide unit (7). The peptide chain was subsequently elongated by iterative cycles of Fmoc deprotection (Method 3) and Fmoc-Aa-OH acylation (Method 5) to give (8). Method 4 was again revisited for the formation of the second Aib-Aib dipeptide unit at positions 3 and 4 (9). The peptide chain (10) was completed after coupling of Fmoc-Pro-OH (Method 5) and MDA (Method 6). Cleavage of the peptide from the solid support was undertaken using Method 7, and the crude product (11) lyophilized prior to purification by semipreparative RP-HPLC, affording the desired precursor as a white amorphous solid (25.6 mg, 25.9% yield). The C-terminal aminoalcohol AMAE was lastly conjugated to the purified precursor (25.6 mg, 0.03 mmol) as AMAE.2TFA salt using Method 8, affording the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4) (17.3 mg, 15.7% overall yield based on 0.l mmol resin loading, >99% purity after semipreparative RP-HPLC purification, Figure 3).

3.2. In Vitro Antiproliferative Testing of the Simplified Trichoderin A Analogue ( 4 )

The in vitro cytotoxicity of trichoderin A (3), prepared as detailed previously [13], and its simplified analogue (4) were subsequently tested against the human PDAC cell line BxPC-3 using the orthogonal, fluorometric PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct Confirmation Assay [14]. The PrestoBlue™ reagent utilizes a cell-permeant resazurin-based dye, which is reduced by reductase enzymes present in viable cells, and therefore provides a proxy of their metabolic health [20]. On the other hand, while the CyQUANT™ Direct nucleic acid stain would bind to the DNA of all cells, the accompanying background suppressor blocks the staining of dead or membrane-permeabilized cells. Thus, only the DNA of viable cells will be stained [15]. The orthogonality of this protocol is based on the nonoverlapping excitation/emission wavelength range of the two dyes, allowing for both assays to be performed sequentially on the same plate. To our surprise, both viability assays indicated that both trichoderin A (3) and its simplified analogue (4) only partially inhibited the proliferation of BxPC-3 cells after a 3-day incubation period, up to the highest concentration level tested of 1 µM (Figure 4).
Intriguingly, there exists a precedence for this observation: the recent discovery of the leucinostatin Y by Kawada’s group was also reported alongside a comparative 2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay against the parent peptide leucinostatin A (1) on the human PDAC cell lines PANC-1, BxPC-3, PSN-1, and PK-8 [21]. Their results indicated that (1) is selectively cytotoxic against all four cell lines, but only when they are cultured under minimal glucose in the growth medium. On this basis, we opted to re-evaluate the cytotoxicity of both trichoderins (3) and (4) against BxPC-3 and also PANC-1 under both ‘low glucose’ and ‘normal glucose’ conditions. Pleasingly, we were able to demonstrate evidence of selective toxicity under the ‘low glucose’ condition in both cell lines (Figure 5 and Table 1), and that the trichoderin A analogue (4) was similarly potent to the parent peptide (3), thereby validating our rationale for the replacement of AHMOD with Cha.

3.3. The Effect of N-Lipidation on the Bioactivity of the Simplified Trichoderin A Analogue ( 4 )

Having established a more synthetically tractable analogue of trichoderin A (3), we subsequently decided to explore the role of the N-terminus fatty acyl chain on its bioactivity. This study was initiated through the synthesis of trichoderin A analogues (12)–(19), varying in lipid chain length from C0 (12) to C12 (19) (Figure 6), following the protocol described in the preceding Scheme 1 (see also Supporting Information).
In addition to this, we also sought to use the decanoyl analogue (18) to probe the functional significance of the methyl group on the C-2 atom of the 2-MDA moiety of analogue (4). The synthesized analogues (12)–(19) were also subjected to an in vitro cytotoxicity screen against BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells under ‘low glucose’ and ‘normal glucose’ conditions in parallel. Resulting dose–response curves and relevant metrics obtained from culturing both cells under ‘low glucose’ are shown in Figure 7 and Table 1 (see also Supporting Information).
The functional significance of lipidation at the N-terminus of trichoderin A (3) was emphasized by the inactivity of analogue (12), which lacked a fatty acyl moiety, across both BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells, irrespective of the culture condition. Intriguingly, the presence of an acetyl group on (13) was already sufficient to induce cytotoxic effects against PANC-1, but not in BxPC-3. In general, we noted a gradual improvement in compound potency with increasing hydrocarbon length of the fatty acyl moiety, although the octanoyl analogue (17) was curiously less potent than the preceding hexanoyl analogue (16) against both cell lines. This trend is consistent across the three response metrics used to quantify the cytotoxicity profile of each drug, namely IC50, AUC, and Emax. We also frequently noted higher cell viabilities from the CyQUANT™ Direct assay than the PrestoBlue™ assay, which could suggest that some viable cells with intact DNA may be metabolically impaired, and thus considered nonviable by the PrestoBlue™ assay. The decanoyl analogue (18) was also satisfyingly found to be more potent than analogues (3) and (4), suggesting that the removal of the C-2 methyl functionality was also well tolerated with regards to the bioactivity of trichoderin A (3). Collectively, the dodecanoyl analogue (19) is the most potent analogue in this tested series, and thus presents as a new template for further structural optimizations toward a more potent trichoderin A (3) analogue.

4. Discussion

Cancer cells preferentially generate ATP via the fermentation of glucose to lactate, compensating for the relative inefficiency of this pathway to the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway by increasing both glucose uptake and lactate secretion [22]. This observation, first reported by the German physiologist Otto Warburg in isolated tumor tissues, formed the basis for the ‘Warburg effect’ [23]. While initially thought to be due to mitochondrial dysfunction, certain cancer subtypes, including PDAC, have been established to contradict this notion by having intact mitochondria, and thus remain capable of producing ATP via OXPHOS (Figure 8) [24].
Our selection of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 in this study was based on their differential metabolic phenotypes, as established by Piccoli’s group [25]. Unlike this study, however, they opted to induce this condition via substitution with galactose, which is metabolized at a slower rate to glucose. Consequently, both cells underwent a forced shift to aerobic respiration by OXPHOS. The dependency of BxPC-3 on glycolysis meant that its proliferation was significantly halted when glucose became a limiting factor. In contrast, the growth of the OXPHOS-competent PANC-1 was only moderately stunted, perhaps reflecting a greater degree of flexibility to seek alternative fuel sources, such as glutamine [26], to maintain the biochemical flux of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Findings from this work was also recently reinforced by Carrier’s group, who carried out a comparative bioenergetics analysis of six human PDAC cell lines, including BxPC-3 and PANC-1. Their results also classified both cell lines under the ‘glycolytic’ and ‘OXPHOS’ groups, respectively [27].
Our results indicate that trichoderin A (3) and its N-lipidated analogues (12)-(19) are universally more potent against BxPC-3 than PANC-1 cells. Given the glycolytic phenotype of BxPC-3 [25,27], the depletion of glucose in the culture medium, which is a requirement for the peptides to be cytotoxic, evidently affected its proliferation at a greater extent relative to PANC-1, which would likely favor the forced shift to OXPHOS-mediated respiration. The dependency of BxPC-3 on glucose is further emphasized by its inability to adapt to this mode of respiration, resulting in a G2/M cell cycle shift and consequently death by apoptosis [25]. Another potential angle, while beyond the scope of the present study, is the differential mutation status of the Kirsten ras oncogene homologue (KRAS) between the two cell lines: BxPC-3 is wild-type (WT) for this gene, whereas PANC-1 carries a G12D mutation, which is the most common subtype in PDAC and leads to the worst prognosis [28]. While it can be rightly argued that PANC-1 is a more representative cell line to evaluate prospective agents against PDAC, the disease unsurprisingly has a KRAS WT subtype, which would likely require differential management [29]. Evidently, a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach is unlikely to be appropriate for the effective management of PDAC, which future treatment options lie on a therapeutic regimen that is personalized for each patient, ensuring maximal improvements in their quality of life [30].

5. Conclusions

We have reported herein the successful preparation of a simplified analogue of the antitubercular peptide trichoderin A (3), wherein the synthetically challenging AHMOD building block has been substituted by the commercially available Cha to afford analogue (4). Furthermore, we have also provided, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of its selective antiproliferative activity against two human PDAC cell lines (BxPC-3 and PANC-1) cultured under minimal glucose. While these results are undoubtedly intriguing and lay the foundation for further studies into this unique aminolipopeptide family, it must be duly noted that cell lines grown in monolayer are not a faithful recapitulation of the complex architecture of the PDAC tumor, as briefed in the Introduction. Therefore, the reproduction of these results in higher order in vitro models such as three-dimensional PDAC organoids [31] is anticipated to advance our understanding of the pharmacology of these aminolipopeptides. The conditional cytotoxicity of trichoderin A (3) also raises some crucial questions on the translatability of these findings in vivo, wherein the subpopulation of cells that are glucose deprived are often reasonably distal from the vasculature, and importantly also hypoxic. Consequently, there likely will be a prerequisite to first arrest glucose uptake/metabolism locally in the tumor prior to administration of the peptide drugs. We envisage that the use of pan-glucose transporter (GLUT) inhibitors such as Glutor [32] in combination with the dodecanoyl analogue of trichoderin A (19) may assist in this cause.
Future work on this aminolipopeptide should also involve the preparation of suitable analogues to explore the potential of other biologically relevant moieties, such as its C-terminal aminoalcohol, which we have shown previously in culicinin D (2) to be an equally critical contributor to its activity [33]. Lastly, relevant studies toward the elucidation of the intracellular mechanism of action of trichoderin A (3) are currently underway, within the context of its selective cytotoxicity under glucose deprivation. Inhibition of the OXPHOS machinery appears to be the central mode of action uniting both leucinostatin A (1) and trichoderin A (3), and could present as a novel angle by which to target nutrient-deprived cancer cells, which are generally more resistant to chemotherapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010287/s1, Figure S1: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (12); Figure S2: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (12) (ca. 98% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 935.3; found: 935.2; Figure S3: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (12), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S4: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (13); Figure S5: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (13) (ca. 99% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 977.3; found: 977.2; Figure S6: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (13), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S7: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (14); Figure S8: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (14) (ca. 99% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 991.3; found: 991.2; Figure S9: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (14), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S10: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (15); Figure S11: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (15) (ca. 99% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1005.4; found: 1005.2; Figure S12: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (15), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S13: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (16); Figure S14: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (16) (ca. 98% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1033.4; found: 1033.2; Figure S15: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (16), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S16: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (17); Figure S17: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (17) (ca. 99% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1061.5; found: 1061.3; Figure S18: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (17), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S19: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (18); Figure S20: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (18) (ca. 98% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1089.5; found: 1089.8; Figure S21: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (18), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Figure S22: Chemical structure of trichoderin A analogue (19); Figure S23: Analytical RP-HPLC profile of pure peptide (19) (ca. 99% as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% B to 95% B (ca. 3% B/min), 1 mL/min. m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1117.6; found: 1117.3; Figure S24: Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 1-day exposure to trichoderin A analogue (19), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays; Scheme S1: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (12); Scheme S2: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (13); Scheme S3: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (14); Scheme S4: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (15); Scheme S5: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (16); Scheme S6: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (17); Scheme S7: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (18); Scheme S8: Fmoc/tBu SPPS of trichoderin A analogue (19).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K.K., J.H. and I.K.; methodology, J.K.K., J.H. and I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.K., J.H. and I.K.; writing—review and editing, J.K.K., J.H., A.J.R.H., A.R.J.P., J.A.W., P.W.R.H., M.A.B. and I.K.; supervision, J.H., A.J.R.H., A.R.J.P., J.A.W., P.W.R.H., M.A.B. and I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (Project Number #18/219).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data can be provided by the authors upon request. No publicly accessible archive storage is available.

Acknowledgments

J.K.K. acknowledges The University of Auckland for a Doctoral Scholarship. J.H. holds a Hugo Charitable Trust Fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kleeff, J.; Korc, M.; Apte, M.; La Vecchia, C.; Johnson, C.D.; Biankin, A.V.; Neale, R.E.; Tempero, M.; Tuveson, D.A.; Hruban, R.H.; et al. Pancreatic Cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2016, 2, 16022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huang, J.; Lok, V.; Ngai, C.H.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, J.; Lao, X.Q.; Ng, K.; Chong, C.; Zheng, Z.-J.; Wong, M.C.S. Worldwide Burden of, Risk Factors for, and Trends in Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Herting, C.J.; Karpovsky, I.; Lesinski, G.B. The Tumor Microenvironment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2021, 40, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tsang, E.S.; Tempero, M.A. Therapeutic Targets in the Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Microenvironment: Past Challenges and Opportunities for the Future. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2021, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cairns, R.A.; Kalliomaki, T.; Hill, R.P. Acute (Cyclic) Hypoxia Enhances Spontaneous Metastasis of KHT Murine Tumors. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 8903–8908. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns, R.A.; Hill, R.P. Acute Hypoxia Enhances Spontaneous Lymph Node Metastasis in an Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Cervical Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 2054–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Stubbing, L.A.; Kavianinia, I.; Brimble, M.A. Synthesis of AHMOD-Containing Aminolipopeptides, Unique Bioactive Peptaibiotics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 3542–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawada, M.; Inoue, H.; Ohba, S.-I.; Masuda, T.; Momose, I.; Ikeda, D. Leucinostatin A Inhibits Prostate Cancer Growth through Reduction of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Expression in Prostate Stromal Cells. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, H.; Janso, J.E.; Yang, H.Y.; Bernan, V.S.; Lin, S.L.; Yu, K. Culicinin D, an Antitumor Peptaibol Produced by the Fungus Culicinomyces Clavisporus, Strain LL-12I252. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pruksakorn, P.; Arai, M.; Kotoku, N.; Vilchèze, C.; Baughn, A.D.; Moodley, P.; Jacobs, W.R.; Kobayashi, M. Trichoderins, Novel Aminolipopeptides from a Marine Sponge-Derived Trichoderma Sp., Are Active against Dormant Mycobacteria. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3658–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pruksakorn, P.; Arai, M.; Liu, L.; Moodley, P.; Jacobs Jr., W. R.; Kobayashi, M. Action-Mechanism of Trichoderin A, an Anti-Dormant Mycobacterial Aminolipopeptide from Marine Sponge-Derived Trichoderma Sp. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 34, 1287–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deer, E.L.; González-Hernández, J.; Coursen, J.D.; Shea, J.E.; Ngatia, J.; Scaife, C.L.; Firpo, M.A.; Mulvihill, S.J. Phenotype and Genotype of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Pancreas 2010, 39, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kavianinia, I.; Kunalingam, L.; Harris, P.W.R.; Cook, G.M.; Brimble, M.A. Total Synthesis and Stereochemical Revision of the Anti-Tuberculosis Peptaibol Trichoderin A. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3878–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. PrestoBlue® and CyQUANT® Direct Confirmation Assay for Cell Viability Protocol—NZ. Available online: www.thermofisher.com/au/en/home/references/protocols/cell-and-tissue-analysis/protocols/prestoblue-and-cyquant-direct-confirmation-assay-for-cell-viability-protocol.html (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  15. CyQUANTTM Direct Cell Proliferation Assay. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/C35011 (accessed on 7 November 2021).
  16. Ackermann, T.; Tardito, S. Cell Culture Medium Formulation and Its Implications in Cancer Metabolism. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hung, K.; Harris, P.W.R.; Brimble, M.A. Synthesis of the Peptaibol Framework of the Anticancer Agent Culicinin D: Stereochemical Assignment of the AHMOD Moiety. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 5784–5787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ko, K.-Y.; Wagner, S.; Yang, S.-H.; Furkert, D.P.; Brimble, M.A. Improved Synthesis of the Unnatural Amino Acids AHMOD and AMD, Components of the Anticancer Peptaibol Culicinin D. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 8631–8636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kavianinia, I.; Stubbing, L.A.; Abbattista, M.R.; Harris, P.W.R.; Smaill, J.B.; Patterson, A.V.; Brimble, M.A. Alanine Scan-Guided Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Analogues of Culicinin D, a Potent Anticancer Peptaibol. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. PrestoBlueTM Cell Viability Reagent. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/A13262 (accessed on 7 November 2021).
  21. Momose, I.; Onodera, T.; Doi, H.; Adachi, H.; Iijima, M.; Yamazaki, Y.; Sawa, R.; Kubota, Y.; Igarashi, M.; Kawada, M. Leucinostatin Y: A Peptaibiotic Produced by the Entomoparasitic Fungus Purpureocillium Lilacinum 40-H-28. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martínez-Reyes, I.; Chandel, N.S. Cancer Metabolism: Looking Forward. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Warburg, O. On the Origin of Cancer Cells. Science 1956, 123, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ashton, T.M.; McKenna, W.G.; Kunz-Schughart, L.A.; Higgins, G.S. Oxidative Phosphorylation as an Emerging Target in Cancer Therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 2482–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tataranni, T.; Agriesti, F.; Ruggieri, V.; Mazzoccoli, C.; Simeon, V.; Laurenzana, I.; Scrima, R.; Pazienza, V.; Capitanio, N.; Piccoli, C. Rewiring Carbohydrate Catabolism Differentially Affects Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines with Diverse Metabolic Profiles. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 41265–41281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, Z.; Liu, F.; Fan, N.; Zhou, C.; Li, D.; Macvicar, T.; Dong, Q.; Bruns, C.J.; Zhao, Y. Targeting Glutaminolysis: New Perspectives to Understand Cancer Development and Novel Strategies for Potential Target Therapies. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Masoud, R.; Reyes-Castellanos, G.; Lac, S.; Garcia, J.; Dou, S.; Shintu, L.; Abdel Hadi, N.; Gicquel, T.; El Kaoutari, A.; Diémé, B.; et al. Targeting Mitochondrial Complex I Overcomes Chemoresistance in High OXPHOS Pancreatic Cancer. Cell Rep. Med. 2020, 1, 100143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dai, M.; Chen, S.; Teng, X.; Chen, K.; Cheng, W. KRAS as a Key Oncogene in the Clinical Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. J. Cancer 2022, 13, 3209–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luchini, C.; Paolino, G.; Mattiolo, P.; Piredda, M.L.; Cavaliere, A.; Gaule, M.; Melisi, D.; Salvia, R.; Malleo, G.; Shin, J.I.; et al. KRAS Wild-Type Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Opportunities. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Torphy, R.J.; Fujiwara, Y.; Schulick, R.D. Pancreatic Cancer Treatment: Better, but a Long Way to Go. Surg. Today 2020, 50, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, H.; Zhuo, Q.; Ye, Z.; Xu, X.; Ji, S. Organoid Model: A New Hope for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment? Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Rev. Cancer 2021, 1875, 188466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reckzeh, E.S.; Karageorgis, G.; Schwalfenberg, M.; Ceballos, J.; Nowacki, J.; Stroet, M.C.M.; Binici, A.; Knauer, L.; Brand, S.; Choidas, A.; et al. Inhibition of Glucose Transporters and Glutaminase Synergistically Impairs Tumor Cell Growth. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019, 26, 1214–1228.e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, F.F.; Stubbing, L.A.; Kavianinia, I.; Abbattista, M.R.; Harris, P.W.R.; Smaill, J.B.; Patterson, A.V.; Brimble, M.A. Synthesis and Antiproliferative Activity of C- and N-Terminal Analogues of Culicinin D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The desmoplastic stromal compartment of PDAC restricts perfusion of its tumor cells. 150 µm is the typical maximal diffusion distance of oxygen from the capillary bed to tissue [5,6]. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. The desmoplastic stromal compartment of PDAC restricts perfusion of its tumor cells. 150 µm is the typical maximal diffusion distance of oxygen from the capillary bed to tissue [5,6]. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g001
Figure 2. Comparative chemical structure of the AHMOD-containing aminolipopeptides leucinostatin A (1), culicinin D (2), and trichoderin A (3). Shared motifs are highlighted accordingly in color: N-terminus lipid tail (green), AHMOD (orange), Aib (blue).
Figure 2. Comparative chemical structure of the AHMOD-containing aminolipopeptides leucinostatin A (1), culicinin D (2), and trichoderin A (3). Shared motifs are highlighted accordingly in color: N-terminus lipid tail (green), AHMOD (orange), Aib (blue).
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g002
Scheme 1. Hybrid solid-/solution-phase synthesis of the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4).
Scheme 1. Hybrid solid-/solution-phase synthesis of the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4).
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 sch001
Figure 3. Analytical RP-HPLC profile of the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4) (>99% purity as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% to 95% B (ca. 3% B min−1), flow rate 1 mL min−1. ESI-MS m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1103.6; found: 1103.3.
Figure 3. Analytical RP-HPLC profile of the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4) (>99% purity as judged by peak area at 210 nm); xTerra® MS C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, linear gradient of 5% to 95% B (ca. 3% B min−1), flow rate 1 mL min−1. ESI-MS m/z [M + H]+ calculated: 1103.6; found: 1103.3.
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g003
Figure 4. Percent viability of BxPC-3 human PDAC cells following 3 day exposure to trichoderin A (3) and its simplified analogue (4), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays.
Figure 4. Percent viability of BxPC-3 human PDAC cells following 3 day exposure to trichoderin A (3) and its simplified analogue (4), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays.
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g004
Figure 5. Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 24 h exposure to trichoderin A (3) and its simplified analogue (4), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays.
Figure 5. Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 human PDAC cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) and ‘normal glucose’ (Glucose +) conditions following a 24 h exposure to trichoderin A (3) and its simplified analogue (4), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays.
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g005
Figure 6. General structure of the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4). The N-terminus has been modified accordingly to generate analogues (12)–(19).
Figure 6. General structure of the simplified trichoderin A analogue (4). The N-terminus has been modified accordingly to generate analogues (12)–(19).
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g006
Figure 7. Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) following a 24 h exposure to trichoderin A analogues (12)–(19), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays.
Figure 7. Comparative percent viability of BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ (Glucose −) following a 24 h exposure to trichoderin A analogues (12)–(19), as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays.
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g007
Figure 8. Unlike cancer cells in general, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells can respire via glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The OXPHOS system of the mitochondrial inner membrane is composed of five enzymes (complexes I-V), which are shown as I, II, III, IV and V in the figure. Abbreviations: GLUT—glucose transporter, ATP—adenosine triphosphate, TCA—tricarboxylic acid. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Figure 8. Unlike cancer cells in general, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells can respire via glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The OXPHOS system of the mitochondrial inner membrane is composed of five enzymes (complexes I-V), which are shown as I, II, III, IV and V in the figure. Abbreviations: GLUT—glucose transporter, ATP—adenosine triphosphate, TCA—tricarboxylic acid. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Pharmaceutics 15 00287 g008
Table 1. Drug response metrics table (IC50, AUC, and Emax) of trichoderin A (3) and its analogues (4), (12)–(19) against BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ condition, as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays. All values are shown in 1 decimal place (d.p.). The most active entry in the series is highlighted in yellow.
Table 1. Drug response metrics table (IC50, AUC, and Emax) of trichoderin A (3) and its analogues (4), (12)–(19) against BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells cultured under ‘low glucose’ condition, as judged by the PrestoBlue™ and CyQUANT™ Direct assays. All values are shown in 1 decimal place (d.p.). The most active entry in the series is highlighted in yellow.
Antiproliferative Activity under ‘Low Glucose’ Condition
PrestoBlueCyQUANT Direct
BxPC-3PANC-1BxPC-3PANC-1
No.IC50 (µM)AUC
(×10−5)
Emax @
1 µM
(%)
IC50 (µM)AUC
(×10−5)
Emax @
9 µM
(%)
IC50 (µM)AUC
(×10−5)
Emax @
1 µM
(%)
IC50 (µM)AUC
(×10−5)
Emax @
9 µM
(%)
(3)0.45.43.60.321.74.70.44.919.61.541.028.2
(4)0.45.11.70.523.12.30.45.421.01.339.629.2
(12)>110.2104.0>990.6101.0>111115.0>992.6107.0
(13)>19.594.06.058.934.6>111111.38.567.848.1
(14)0.66.825.11.838.431.50.66.827.37.051.851.5
(15)0.55.816.30.933.631.00.55.833.84.850.353.7
(16)0.45.07.10.524.37.70.45.221.02.042.141.0
(17)0.45.120.00.625.58.10.55.633.52.043.731.6
(18)0.23.35.50.222.23.30.23.930.02.244.741.7
(19)0.11.64.60.221.44.70.12.618.30.838.926.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kasim, J.K.; Hong, J.; Hickey, A.J.R.; Phillips, A.R.J.; Windsor, J.A.; Harris, P.W.R.; Brimble, M.A.; Kavianinia, I. The Anti-Tubercular Aminolipopeptide Trichoderin A Displays Selective Toxicity against Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Cultured under Glucose Starvation. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010287

AMA Style

Kasim JK, Hong J, Hickey AJR, Phillips ARJ, Windsor JA, Harris PWR, Brimble MA, Kavianinia I. The Anti-Tubercular Aminolipopeptide Trichoderin A Displays Selective Toxicity against Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Cultured under Glucose Starvation. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(1):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kasim, Johanes K., Jiwon Hong, Anthony J. R. Hickey, Anthony R. J. Phillips, John A. Windsor, Paul W. R. Harris, Margaret A. Brimble, and Iman Kavianinia. 2023. "The Anti-Tubercular Aminolipopeptide Trichoderin A Displays Selective Toxicity against Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Cultured under Glucose Starvation" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 1: 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010287

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop