Next Article in Journal
Navitoclax Enhances the Therapeutic Effects of PLK1 Targeting on Lung Cancer Cells in 2D and 3D Culture Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrating In Vitro and In Silico Analysis of a Cationic Antimicrobial Peptide Interaction with Model Membranes of Colistin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Acoustic Parameters and Sonication Schemes on Transcranial Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption Induced by Pulsed Weakly Focused Ultrasound
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dextran-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Loaded with Curcumin for Antimicrobial Therapies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Co-Loading of Inorganic Nanoparticles and Natural Oil in the Electrospun Janus Nanofibers for a Synergetic Antibacterial Effect

1
School of Health Sciences, Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong 999077, China
2
School of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
3
UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(6), 1208; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061208
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials and Novel Biologics to Manage Bacterial Infections)

Abstract

:
Side-by-side electrospinning is a powerful but challenging technology that can be used to prepare Janus nanofibers for various applications. In this work, cellulose acetate (CA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) were used as polymer carriers for silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) and lavender oil (LO), respectively, processing these into two-compartment Janus fibers. A bespoke spinneret was used to facilitate the process and prevent the separation of the working fluids. The process of side-by-side electrospinning was recorded with a digital camera, and the morphology and internal structure of the products were characterized by electron microscopy. Clear two-compartment fibers are seen. X-ray diffraction patterns demonstrate silver nanoparticles have been successfully loaded on the CA side, and infrared spectroscopy indicates LO is dispersed on the PCL side. Wetting ability and antibacterial properties of the fibers suggested that PCL-LO//CA-Ag NPs formulation had strong antibacterial activity, performing better than fibers containing only one active component. The PCL-LO//CA-Ag NPs had a 20.08 ± 0.63 mm inhibition zone for E. coli and 19.75 ± 0.96 mm for S. aureus. All the fibers had water contact angels all around 120°, and hence, have suitable hydrophobicity to prevent water ingress into a wound site. Overall, the materials prepared in this work have considerable promise for wound healing applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dressings play an important role in the treatment of wounds, acting both to prevent infection and accelerate healing. In recent decades, a range of novel wound dressings has been developed based on technologies such as sponges [1,2], hydrogels [3,4], fibers [5,6,7,8], and particles [9,10], among others. Unlike traditional wound dressings, various functions have been added to these new formulations, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, and/or anti-adhesion properties, the ability to absorb tissue exudate, and the inclusion of active ingredients for the promotion of wound healing [11,12]. Among these properties, antibacterial performance is important for wound dressing. As bacteria can lead to a series of symptoms in the wound and prolong the healing period, it should be eliminated first and kept away from the wound. Thus, various small-molecule substances, which have antibacterial performance, including organic and inorganic, are applied in wound dressings for that purpose. Drug-loaded fibers have been applied as dressings in a number of studies [13,14,15]. Such fibers can offer controlled drug release and have huge potential as wound dressing [16,17,18]. Of all of the various fiber preparation methods, the “one-step” electrospinning technology has been frequently favored by researchers [19,20].
Electrospinning has emerged as an important technology in preparing fiber materials for a wide variety of scientific applications [21,22,23,24]. In the biomedical field, the potential applications include drug delivery systems [25,26,27,28], tissue engineering [29,30,31,32], or biosensors [33]. For fabricating advanced and multi-functional fibers, multifluid electrospinning processes have been developed in various forms [34,35,36,37,38]. To date, side-by-side electrospinning (or Janus) electrospinning has proven to be a challenging technology. However, it has many benefits since it can produce two-sided Janus fibers, with the two sides having very different properties and retaining their intrinsic properties [39]. In a traditional side-by-side electrospinning process, two parallel metallic capillaries are assembled side-by-side to form a spinneret [40]. However, electrostatic repulsion between the working fluids when they exit the spinneret can result in their separation. There are some strategies to solve this problem. One is to increase the contact area between the working fluids before the Taylor cone is formed [41,42]. The other is to use electrostatic force to bind the working fluids together [43]. Herein, a home-made Janus spinneret, comprising two 21G needles wrapped with a metal tube, was used to carry out side-by-side electrospinning. The two smaller needles are kept parallel, and the outer needle protrudes over the 21G needles. This spinneret ensures that the working fluids are in full contact before the Taylor cone is formed and helps to increase the contact area between the fluids.
The biodegradable and resorbable polymers, such as poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) and poly(α-L-glutamic acid), have been widely used in bio-applications such as tissue engineering [44,45], drug delivery [46,47], wound dressings [48,49], scaffolds [50] and surgical sutures [51,52]. However, PCL is hydrophobic. This makes it a useful material for anti-adhesive applications but is poor at absorbing the exudate from a wound. For an effective dressing, therefore, a hygroscopic water-absorbent material is required. Cellulose acetate (CA) is one suitable material for this application: it has good water absorption and liquid transport ability, is biocompatible and, like PCL, has been used in wound dressings [53,54], tissue engineering [55], and drug delivery [56,57]. The literature reports that a mixture of PCL and CA can be processed into nanofibers through uniaxial electrospinning, and the resultant mat is impregnated with propolis. However, after treatment, the PCL/CA mats almost lost any hydrophobic properties [58]. In this work, we sought to use side-by-side electrospinning to overcome this issue.
Lavender oil (LO) is an essential oil that can be used directly on the skin and is also commonly used in wound dressings owing to its antibacterial properties and promotion of wound healing [59]. LO prevents adhesion of a dressing to the wound and thus avoids secondary injuries being caused during the changing of a dressing. Essential oils in wound dressings have been reported by many researchers. For example, Ardekani et al. used poly (vinyl alcohol) loaded with zataria multiflora essential oil to this end [60]. In another work, Unalan et al. incorporated essential clove oil into PCL/gelatin nanofibers for antibacterial wound dressings [61], while Sara et al. loaded essential oils on electrospun PCL nanofibers to generate anti-inflammatory patches [62]. As the combined antibacterial activity often performed better than one and took advantage of side-by-side electrospinning, antibacterial nanoparticles were incorporated into fibers as well.
Another material often incorporated into wound dressings is silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), which also have antibacterial properties [63,64]. For instance, Gao et al. developed a stem cell-seeded bilayer Ag-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) composite as a wound dressing [65], and El-Aassar et al. prepared an Ag NP-poly(glycolic acid)/hyaluronic acid nanofiber wound dressing [66]. Those wound dressings all have good performance in promoting wound healing. For many Ag NPs loaded polymer matrices, hydrophilic materials are preferred, in view of the requirement for them to release silver ions and be in contact with the target bacteria. The combinations of essential oils and Ag NPs have been incorporated into electrospun fiber membranes and explored in wound dressing applications. Sofi et al. electrospun a mixed solution composed of Ag NPs, LO and polyurethane and prepared a fiber mat used for wound dressing [59]. Phan et al. loaded orange essential oil and Ag NPs on a treated electrospun CA fiber membrane through the soaking method [67]. In antibacterial tests, they all demonstrated good antibacterial performance.
The explorations in uniaxial electrospinning have been reported many times; however, Janus fiber from side-by-side electrospinning is short on research. In this paper, an organic antibacterial material, LO, and inorganic antibacterial material, Ag NPs, were combined into a dressing potential material. A ‘one-step’ method was implemented to prepare PCL-LO//CA-Ag NPs Janus fibers (Figure 1). The hydrophobic polymer PCL and swelling polymer CA were used as excipients. Lavender oil and Ag NPs were loaded into PCL and CA, respectively. Janus fibers were successfully fabricated with good performance both in terms of their antibacterial and water-resistant properties. The fiber mats, thus, have significant potential in wound dressing applications, and Janus electrospinning is demonstrated to be an efficient platform for preparing functional fiber materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cellulose acetate (CA, average Mn~30,000, 39.8 wt.% acetyl, 1.3 g/mL) and polycaprolactone (PCL, average Mn~80,000, 1.145 g/mL) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Lavender oil (LO, 0.882 g/mL) was obtained from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs, size: 60~150 nm) were provided by Jiangsu Xianfeng Nanomaterials Technology Co., Ltd., Xianfeng, China. Solvents, 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) and trichloromethane (TCM), were obtained from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China, and are analytically pure.

2.2. Preparing Janus Fibers

Janus electrospinning processes were conducted with a home-made spinneret as depicted in Figure 2a. Four different spinning solutions were prepared (Table 1). All solutions were prepared in a similar fashion. To take F4 as an example, 0.6 mL LO was added into a pre-prepared 10% (w/v) PCL solution (1.0 g PCL in 10 mL TCM) and subjected to magnetic stirring overnight. 1.0 g CA and 0.4 g Ag NPs were dispersed into 10 mL HFIP under ultrasonication for 30 min before use.
Janus electrospinning has been detailed in our previous work [68]. Briefly, two working fluids were loaded into syringes and dispensed by separate pumps (KDS100, KDS200, Cole Parmer, Chicago, IL, USA) into a home-made spinneret. A high voltage electrostatic field was generated by a high-voltage electrostatic generator (ZGF-60 kV/2 mA, Huatian Electric Power Automation Co. Let., Wuhan, China), and the product was collected on aluminum foil. The collection distance and voltage were set to 20 cm and 7.5 kV, respectively. Both flow rates were set at 1.0 mL/h. Images of the apparatus are presented in Figure 2b–g.

2.3. Characterization

2.3.1. Morphology and Structures

A Quanta FEG450 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to examine the morphology of the fibers. Before they were detected, samples were cut from collectors, pasted on the sample table without removing aluminum foils to ensure fibrous membranes were flat, and coated with gold for 120 s to make them conductive. The average diameter was calculated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) to measure 100 randomly selected locations in the images. The internal structure of the fibers was determined using a JEM 2200F transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3.2. Physical and Chemical States

An AXS X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD; Bruker, Bremen, Germany) was used to collect XRD patterns within the 2θ range of 10~80°. A Spectrum 100 spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to collect attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) data from 500 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to explore the degradation temperature of the membranes. A sample weight between 6 and 8 mg was placed into a 6.5 × 4 mm alumina crucible. These tests were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere while samples were heated at a rate of 5 °C per minute from 50 °C to 450 °C.

2.3.4. Wetting and Moisture Retention Studies of Nanofiber Mats

Wetting studies were carried out using interfacial tension measuring apparatus (JC2000C1, Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Technology Apparatus Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). A camera was employed to monitor changes in a drop of water (~0.5 μL) placed on each fiber mat. Built-in software was used to measure the water contact angle (WCA). Each sample was repeated six times, and the results were recorded as mean ± S.D.
In moisture retention tests, 0.5 g of fiber membrane was immersed into 200 mL deionized water for 1 h, taken out of the membrane with overloading water and drained for 2~3 min under natural conditions. Then, the centrifuge tube was put containing moist membrane into a centrifuge (LC-LX-L40B, Shanghai Lichen Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with 1000× g centrifugal force for 15 min. Then, the water was poured out, and then the centrifuge tube was put back for another 15 min centrifugation. Then, the membrane was put into a pre-weighted reagent bottle, whose mass is A. After that, the membrane with the reagent bottle opened was placed on a heater set at 37 °C, and they were weighed at a predetermined time. Their mass was recorded as Bn each time except for the mass at last time, which was marked as Bend. Moisturizing efficiency (M) was calculated through the following equation. This test was repeated six times, and the results were recorded as mean ± S.D.
M = B n B e n d B e n d A

2.3.5. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of the PCL-LO//CA-Ag NPs Janus fibers was determined against Gram-positive S. aureus and Gram-negative E. coli using a disk diffusion assay. Three 6-mm-diameter circular samples of each fiber formulation were placed on Luria-Bertani agar plates which had been uniformly coated with S. aureus or E. coli. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 25 °C, photographed, and the zones of inhibition measured. Results are reported as mean ± SD (n = 3).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Structure of Janus Fibers

The Janus electrospinning processes utilize a macroscopic spinneret to fabricate microscopic fibers with a side-by-side structure. The diameters of the fibers are: F1 1.049 ± 0.484 μm, F2 1.509 ± 0.487 μm, F3 1.334 ± 0.587 μm and F4 1.459 ± 0.506 μm. F1 possessed the smallest average diameter and standard deviation. F3, the fiber containing Ag NPs in CA on one side and blank PCL on the other, has markedly less regular morphology than the others. Ag NPs can be clearly observed in the F3 and F4 fibers (Figure 3h,k). These images also indicate that the Ag NPs tend to aggregate, but this should not be detrimental to an antibacterial wound dressing.
Combined with SEM and TEM images, Janus’s structure can be clearly observed. TEM images (Figure 4a,b) also depict representative Janus structures for both F1 and F4. F1 has a PCL side of ca. 757 nm and a CA side of 482 nm. Ag NPs in F4 are clearly visible in Figure 4b. Careful observation of the SEM (Figure 3b,e,h,k and Figure 4c,d) and TEM images (Figure 4a,b) reveals that there are many pores on the surface of both sides of the fibers. Figure 4c indicates the pore on the CA side are bigger and deeper than those on the PCL side. This may be governed by two parameters: solvent evaporation and polymer diffusion before fiber collection. According to Ref. [69], moderate and poor solvents for a given polymer cause nonuniformity in the polymer solution, hampering diffusion during the drawing process and resulting in a rough morphology.
The Ag NPs are clearly distributed throughout the CA side of the fibers (Figure 4d). The antibacterial ability of Ag NPs comes both from the NPs themselves and also from silver ions leached from them [70]. Both can induce oxidative stress, which will produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals [71]. The presence of Ag NPs, which are exposed to the same humid environment as bacteria, should result in both the Ag NPs and freed Ag+ ions being able to interact with target bacteria, thus resulting in a potent antibacterial performance.

3.2. Formation Process of Janus Microfiber

The strategy in preparing Janus microfiber through a home-made spinneret with a protruding part that can promote the contact of two working solutions is traceable [41]. In the work reported by Fei et al., two parallel stainless needles were nested into a pipette, which is used to prolong the contact course between two working solutions. Through a long journal of two working solutions, a Janus Taylor cone can easily be formed. However, this spinneret may not be suitable for dilute solutions since they will blend into a mixture during this journal with low flow rates. In this work, a short protrude part was applied for the balance among mixing problems and contact purpose of working solutions. After working solutions flow through their capillary needle separately, there is a short period for the two working solutions to contact each other before forming the Taylor cone. Along with the three stages of the electrospinning process, Taylor cone, straight jet and bending and whipping, a working fluid composed of two solutions was solidified under a high voltage electrostatic field (shown in Figure 5a).
In Figure 5b, illustrations of the charge distribution of two different side-by-side electrospinning processes are provided. In traditional side-by-side electrospinning, the Taylor cone is formed by two columns of fluids with a small contact area. In the following stages, they would be separated by electrostatic repulsion most likely and would not form Janus fiber effectively. However, in this work, a home-made spinneret will provide effective contact between working solutions before the Taylor cone is formed. Even though Janus microfiber has been successfully prepared by using this spinneret, in this work, a cross-section of microfibers obtained tends to deform into oval from round. That can be easily observed in SEM images. There are some reasons. As PCL and CA were dissolved into TCM and HFIP, respectively, they have different conductivity, which will result in asymmetrical charge distribution of two sides. The diverse volatilization rates of two solvents also affect Janus microfibers’ formation. With their combined effect, the working fluid can be stretched into an oval shape by electrostatic repulsion. Besides F1, other Janus fibers will experience a similar course because essential oil and inorganic nanoparticles have little influence on the electrospinning process except for the morphology of fibers. Additionally, the single-fluid blending electrospinning is facile to encapsulate a certain drug with a high encapsulation efficiency [72,73], which often has few influences on the preparation of nanofibers. Similarly, the side-by-side electrospinning process is able to encapsulate two different types of active ingredients within each side of the resultant Janus structures effectively.

3.3. Physical Form and Compatibility

Different theoretical amounts of Ag NPs and LO in four Janus fibers have been listed in Table 2. However, with the volatilization of LO during the electrospinning process, there would be a lower weight percent in F2 and F4 than theoretical values.
The physical form of the raw materials and fiber mats was characterized by XRD. From Figure 6a, it can be seen that PCL possesses two strong Bragg reflections in the region of 20°~25°, consistent with its semicrystalline structure. The intensities of these were weakened in four nanofiber mats, which might be indicative of reduced crystallinity. This is logical since electrospinning can solidify a solution very rapidly, which means there is minimal time available for the organization of molecules to form a crystalline structure. CA demonstrates a broad halo in its XRD pattern, typical of an amorphous material. The Ag NPs indicate the expected Bragg reflections at 38.06° (111), 44.22° (200), 64.24° (220), and 77.30° (311). These are consistent with the literature structure PDF#04-0783. F3 and F4 indicate faint Ag NP reflections at 38.38° and 38.82°, confirming successful loading into the formulation.
The FTIR data is provided in Figure 6b and chemical structures in Figure 6c. In this test, the compatibility of components and interactions among them in Janus fiber have been explored. PCL demonstrates absorbance peaks at 1361, 1419 and 1472 cm−1 arising from bending vibrations of -CH2, at 2867 and 2944 cm-1 (symmetric and asymmetric -CH2 stretching), and at 1236 cm−1 (-COO vibration). CA has peaks at 2947 and 2872 cm−1 (C-H stretching) and 1032 cm−1 (C-O-C bending). These bands, in addition to the very distinct stretching of the ester C=O groups in CA and PCL from 1724–1727 cm−1, can all be seen in the spectra of the fibers [74]. The Ag NPs do not show appreciable absorbance in the FTIR and, thus, cannot be detected here. Absorbance bands at 2917 cm−1 (C-H stretching) and 1642 cm−1 (C=C stretching) can be seen in LO but not in the fibers’ spectra. However, other bands distinctive of LO, such as linalyl acetate, camphor and lavandulyl acetate carbonyl groups, can be seen confirming successful loading [59].

3.4. Thermogravimetry

It is clear that LO is electrospun into microfibers, and the perfume of LO is spread from membranes that can be smelt. However, as LO is uniformly dispersed into the PCL side in F2 and F4, there are few characteristic peaks of LO that can be distinguished in FTIR curves. Thus, TGA experiments were conducted, finding that LO-loaded fibrous membranes, F2 and F4, performed a distinctive weight loss from 70 °C to 120 °C. It is consistent with previous research that some essential oils can be fully removed at around 130 °C [75,76]. That indicates LO has been successfully incorporated into Janus fibers. Even though the value of weight loss does not consist of a theoretical value listed in Table 2, the content of LO should be all essential oil carried by fiber membranes because of the glass transition temperature of PCL at around 70 °C. When the temperature came to 70 °C, PCL would transform into a new physical state, which could not hold LO well. It is the volatilization during the electrospinning process that causes LO loss.
Before the temperature reached 300 °C, F1 and F3 had a small loss of weight, which was attributed to moist removal. All Janus fibers displayed a big weight loss from 300 °C to 400 °C. That is caused by the degradation of the polymer matrix as the degradation temperatures of PCL and CA are 364 °C and 335 °C, respectively [77,78,79]. In the end, the temperature rose to 450 °C, and all-fiber membranes lost around their 90% weight and came to a new plateau. The addition of Ag NPs performed little influence on TGA curves [66].

3.5. Wetting Ability and Moisture Retention Tests

Hydrophobicity is an important function for a wound dressing, preventing ingress of water from outside, which may cause infection and inflammation. Thus, water contact angle tests were performed to reveal the hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties of the fibers. The WCA of all the fibers exceeded 90°, showing they are all hydrophobic. The blank fiber (F1) has a WCA of 110.1 ± 3.7°, while F2~F4 have greater contact angles of 121.2 ± 7.1°, 119.3 ± 4.3°, 120.8 ± 4.3°, respectively. All the fibers are, thus, very hydrophobic and suitable for wound dressing applications, which will effectively protect the wound from infection. Although the fibers are initially hydrophobic, the presence of CA should permit them to absorb water and thus take up the exudate from a wound.
To eliminate the deviation brought by LO and Ag NPs release from Janus fiber, F1 was the only one tested in moisture retention. As polymers are the major part of absorbing and storing water, they can represent their water-saving property. After 30 min centrifugal process at 1000× g, superfluous water was removed. In the beginning, Janus fiber membranes can hold 1.786 ± 0.177 times its weight in water. Along with heat preservation time increasing, the moisture retention rate was reduced gradually. In Figure 7b, it is clear that water retained in the fibrous mat was gradually removed in four hours. That property can maintain a moist environment, which is a benefit for the wound healing process.

3.6. Antibacterial Tests

Another important property of a wound dressing is antibacterial performance. Eliminating bacteria in the wound in a timely fashion can effectively avoid infection and inflammation. The presence of Ag NPs in the CA side of the fibers should provide a long-term protective effect. Figure 8 demonstrates that the F1 membrane has no observable antibacterial performance, but the other formulations demonstrate clear zones of inhibition and thus are able to prevent bacterial growth. The effects are similar against both gram-negative (E. coli) and gram-positive (S. aureus) bacteria. Formulation F4, carrying Ag NPs on the CA side and LO on the PCL side, demonstrates the greatest antibacterial properties.
The mechanisms underpinning the antibacterial performance of the Janus fibers are illustrated in Figure 9. Linalool and linalyl acetate are the two main components of LO [80,81], with linalool having verified antibacterial properties. As the O atom of the hydroxy group within linalool has strong electrophilicity and free radical affinity, it can disrupt the intramolecular hydrogen bonding arrangement in protein during the antibacterial process [82]. The Ag NPs can release silver ions and generate ROS. These can destroy the bacterial cell membrane and increase its permeability [70]. Subsequently, silver ions can enter the bacteria, suppress respiration and cause leakage of the cellular contents [63]. Both processes can lead to bacterial death, and hence, the combination of LO and Ag NPs provides the most effective antibacterial performance.

4. Conclusions

In this research, Janus fibers loaded with LO and Ag NPs were prepared through a side-by-side electrospinning process. A home-made spinneret was used for enlarging the contact area of the working fluids prior to ejection from the spinneret. All the fibers generated have diameters around 1.0~1.5 μm. Ag NPs and LO were successfully loaded into the fibers, with the former in a CA-based compartment and the latter in a PCL compartment. There are many pores on the CA surface, allowing access to the Ag NPs by aqueous media. Wetting and antibacterial tests demonstrate the LO and Ag NPs loaded Janus fiber has good hydrophobic performance (with a WCA of 120.8 ± 4.3°) and strong antibacterial properties (20.08 ± 0.63 mm inhibition zone for E. coli and 19.75 ± 0.93 mm for S. aureus). The antibacterial properties of this material arise from the synergistic combination of LO and the Ag NPs, which can cause bacterial death through a number of mechanisms. The electrospinning process developed in this work provides an effective platform for preparing functional Janus fiber membranes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.-G.Y. and S.W.A.B.; methodology, M.W.; validation, M.W. and D.-G.Y.; investigation, M.W.; resources, D.-G.Y. and S.W.A.B.; data curation, M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W.; writing—review and editing, D.-G.Y., G.R.W. and S.W.A.B.; visualization, M.W.; supervision, D.-G.Y. and S.W.A.B.; project administration, S.W.A.B.; funding acquisition, S.W.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (No. UGC/FDS11/P01/21) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No.20ZR1439000).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

SWAB thanks the support of the Institutional Strategic Grant of the Caritas Institute of Higher Education (ISG190101).

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Janus medical sponge dressings with anisotropic wettability for wound healing. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 23, 101068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, S.; Guo, Y.; Li, M.; You, R. Mechanically robust and flexible silk protein/polysaccharide composite sponges for wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 216, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, W.-C.; Ying, R.; Wang, W.; Guo, Y.; He, Y.; Mo, X.; Xue, C.; Mao, X. A macroporous hydrogel dressing with enhanced antibacterial and anti-inflammatory capabilities for accelerated wound healing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ng, J.Y.; Zhu, X.; Mukherjee, D.; Zhang, C.; Hong, S.; Kumar, Y.; Gokhale, R.; Ee, P.L.R. Pristine gellan gum collagen interpenetrating network hydrogels as mechanically enhanced anti-inflammatory biologic wound dressings for burn wound therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 1470–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shi, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, W.; Jiang, L.; Wang, S. A self-pumping dressing for draining excessive biofluid around wounds. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, J.; Wang, K.; Yu, D.-G.; Yang, Y.; Bligh, S.W.A.; Williams, G.R. Electrospun Janus nanofibers loaded with a drug and inorganic nanoparticles as an effective antibacterial wound dressing. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2020, 111, 110805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Razzaq, A.; Khan, Z.U.; Saeed, A.; Shah, K.A.; Khan, N.U.; Menaa, B.; Iqbal, H.; Menaa, F. Development of cephradine-loaded gelatin/polyvinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibers for effective diabetic wound healing: In-vitro and in-vivo assessments. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xu, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yu, D. Electrospun medical sutures for wound healing: A review. Polymers 2022, 14, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, C.-Y.; Yin, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, T.-H.; Liu, H.-M.; Rao, S.-S.; Tan, Y.-J.; Qian, Y.-X.; Liu, Y.-W.; Hu, X.-K.; et al. Angstrom-scale silver particle-embedded carbomer gel promotes wound healing by inhibiting bacterial colonization and inflammation. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba0942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. López-Iglesias, C.; Quílez, C.; Barros, J.; Velasco, D.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Jorcano, J.L.; Monteiro, F.J.; García-González, C.A. Lidocaine-loaded solid lipid microparticles (SLMPs) produced from gas-saturated solutions for wound applications. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xi, Y.; Ge, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, M.; Niu, W.; Cheng, W.; Xue, Y.; Lin, C.; Lei, B. Bioactive anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidative silicon-based nanofibrous dressing enables cutaneous tumor photothermo-chemo therapy and infection-induced wound healing. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 2904–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, M.; Wang, M.; Niu, W.; Chen, M.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, L.; Xie, C.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Leng, T.; et al. Injectable self-healing anti-inflammatory europium oxide-based dressing with high angiogenesis for improving wound healing and skin regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Yu, D.-G.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, P. Electrospun PVP-core/PHBV-shell fibers to eliminate tailing off for an improved sustained release of curcumin. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 4170–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yao, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Electrospun nanofibrous materials for wound healing. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2020, 2, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Xu, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ji, W.; Kim, J.R.; et al. Engineering of hollow polymeric nanosphere-supported imidazolium-based ionic liquids with enhanced antimicrobial activities. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, H.; Wu, M.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Y.; Ge, R.; Yu, D.-G. Engineered spindles of little molecules around electrospun nanofibers for biphasic drug release. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2021, 3, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, M.; Hou, J.; Yu, D.-G.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Chen, Z. Electrospun tri-layer nanodepots for sustained release of acyclovir. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 846, 156471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Séon-Lutz, M.; Couffin, A.-C.; Vignoud, S.; Schlatter, G.; Hébraud, A. Electrospinning in water and in situ crosslinking of hyaluronic acid/cyclodextrin nanofibers: Towards wound dressing with controlled drug release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, S.; Hou, S.; Chen, X.; Yu, D.-G.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Williams, G.R. Energy-saving electrospinning with a concentric teflon-core rod spinneret to create medicated nanofibers. Polymers 2020, 12, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aburayan, W.S.; Alajmi, A.M.; Alfahad, A.J.; Alsharif, W.K.; Alshehri, A.A.; Booq, R.Y.; Alsudir, S.A.; Alsulaihem, F.M.; Bukhary, H.A.; Badr, M.Y.; et al. Melittin from bee venom encapsulating electrospun fibers as a potential antimicrobial wound dressing patches for skin infections. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, C.; Dong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, S.; Wang, X.; Kang, S.; Yu, D.; Wang, P.; Jiang, Q. Gold nanoparticles-loaded polyvinylpyrrolidone/ethylcellulose coaxial electrospun nanofibers with enhanced osteogenic capability for bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Des. 2021, 212, 110240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, X.; Zhang, M.; Lv, H.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yu, D.-G. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile-based lace nanostructures and their Cu(II) adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 288, 120643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sivan, M.; Madheswaran, D.; Valtera, J.; Kostakova, E.K.; Lukas, D. Alternating current electrospinning: The impacts of various high-voltage signal shapes and frequencies on the spinnability and productivity of polycaprolactone nanofibers. Mater. Des. 2022, 213, 110308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, S.; Jiang, W.; Shen, L.; Zhang, G.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yu, D.-G. Electrospun hybrid films for fast and convenient delivery of active herb extracts. Membranes 2022, 12, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, D.; Lv, H. Preface-striding into nano drug delivery. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2022, 19, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Croitoru, A.-M.; Karaçelebi, Y.; Saatcioglu, E.; Altan, E.; Ulag, S.; Aydoğan, H.K.; Sahin, A.; Motelica, L.; Oprea, O.; Tihauan, B.-M.; et al. Electrically triggered drug delivery from novel electrospun poly(lactic acid)/graphene oxide/quercetin fibrous scaffolds for wound dressing applications. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liu, P. Electrospun coaxial fibers to optimize the release of poorly water-soluble drug. Polymers 2022, 14, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, M.; Song, W.; Tang, Y.; Xu, X.; Huang, Y.; Yu, D. Polymer-based nanofiber-nanoparticle hybrids and their medical applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Afami, M.E.; El Karim, I.; About, I.; Krasnodembskaya, A.D.; Laverty, G.; Lundy, F.T. Multicomponent peptide hydrogels as an innovative platform for cell-based tissue engineering in the dental pulp. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, Z.; Sheng, D.; Jiang, L.; Shafiq, M.; Khan, A.u.R.; Hashim, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, B.; Xie, X.; Chen, J.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-capturing aligned electrospun polycaprolactone/gelatin nanofibers promote patellar ligament regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2022, 140, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.; Cheng, W.; Zhu, J.; Li, W.; Li, D.; Yang, X.; Zhao, W.; Ren, M.; Ren, J.; Mo, X.; et al. Electrospun nanoyarn and exosomes of adipose-derived stem cells for urethral regeneration: Evaluations in vitro and in vivo. Colloids Surf. B 2022, 209, 112218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiao, S.; Peng, Q.; Yang, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, W.; Shi, X. Preparation of [amine-terminated generation 5 poly(amidoamine)]-graft-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) electrospun nanofibrous mats for scaffold-mediated gene transfection. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kang, S.; Zhao, K.; Yu, D.; Zheng, X.; Huang, C. Advances in biosensing and environmental monitoring based on electrospun nanofibers. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 404–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Feng, Z.; Yu, D.-G.; Wang, K. Electrospun nanofiber membranes for air filtration: A review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ghazalian, M.; Afshar, S.; Rostami, A.; Rashedi, S.; Bahrami, S.H. Fabrication and characterization of chitosan-polycaprolactone core-shell nanofibers containing tetracycline hydrochloride. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 636, 128163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, D.-G.; Wang, M.; Ge, R. Strategies for sustained drug release from electrospun multi-layer nanostructures. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 13, e1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhao, K.; Lu, Z.-H.; Zhao, P.; Kang, S.-X.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Yu, D.-G. Modified tri–axial electrospun functional core–shell nanofibrous membranes for natural photodegradation of antibiotics. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 131455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ning, T.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, H.; Guo, S.; Wang, K.; Yu, D.-G. Orodispersible membranes from a modified coaxial electrospinning for fast dissolution of diclofenac sodium. Membranes 2021, 11, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Silva, P.M.; Torres-Giner, S.; Vicente, A.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Management of operational parameters and novel spinneret configurations for the electrohydrodynamic processing of functional polymers. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022, 307, 2100858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gupta, P.; Wilkes, G.L. Some investigations on the fiber formation by utilizing a side-by-side bicomponent electrospinning approach. Polymer 2003, 44, 6353–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bi, F.; Dong, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, G. Flexible Janus nanofiber to acquire tuned and enhanced simultaneous magnetism-luminescence bifunctionality. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 7244–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Murugadoss, V.; Huang, M.; Yang, H.; Wan, F.; Yu, D.G.; Guo, Z. Electrospun structural nanohybrids combining three composites for fast helicide delivery. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cai, M.; He, H.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; Li, J.; Chen, F.; Yuan, D.; Ning, X. Efficient synthesis of PVDF/PI side-by-side bicomponent nanofiber membrane with enhanced mechanical strength and good thermal stability. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hassanajili, S.; Karami-Pour, A.; Oryan, A.; Talaei-Khozani, T. Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2019, 104, 109960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qian, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, F.; Diekwisch, T.G.H.; Luan, X.; Yang, J. Triple PLGA/PCL scaffold modification including silver impregnation, collagen coating, and electrospinning significantly improve biocompatibility, antimicrobial, and osteogenic properties for orofacial tissue regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 37381–37396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, H.; Jiang, W.; Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; Yu, D.-G.; Shao, J. Hybrid films prepared from a combination of electrospinning and casting for offering a dual-phase drug release. Polymers 2022, 14, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, D.G. Preface-Bettering drug delivery knowledge from pharmaceutical techniques and excipients. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2021, 18, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lan, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tian, F.; Miao, X.; Wang, H.; Tang, Y. Coaxial electrospun PVA/PCL nanofibers with dual release of tea polyphenols and e-poly (L-lysine) as antioxidant and antibacterial wound dressing materials. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 601, 120525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Song, W.; Lu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Yu, D.-G.; Kim, I. Recent Advances in Poly(α-L-glutamic acid)-Based Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. El-Shanshory, A.A.; Agwa, M.M.; Abd-Elhamid, A.I.; Soliman, H.M.A.; Mo, X.; Kenawy, E.-R. Metronidazole topically immobilized electrospun nanofibrous scaffold: Novel secondary intention wound healing accelerator. Polymers 2022, 14, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liu, S.; Yu, J.; Li, H.; Wang, K.; Wu, G.; Wang, B.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; et al. Controllable drug release behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) surgical suture coating with ciprofloxacin (CPFX)-Polycaprolactone (PCL)/Polyglycolide (PGA). Polymers 2020, 12, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. El-Bakary, M.A.; El-Farahaty, K.A.; El-Sayed, N.M. Investigating the mechanical behavior of PGA/PCL copolymer surgical suture material using multiple-beam interference microscopy. Fibers Polym. 2019, 20, 1116–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Unnithan, A.R.; Gnanasekaran, G.; Sathishkumar, Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, C.S. Electrospun antibacterial polyurethane–cellulose acetate–zein composite mats for wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 884–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Khan, M.Q.; Kharaghani, D.; Sanaullah; Shahzad, A.; Saito, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Ogasawara, H.; Kim, I.S. Fabrication of antibacterial electrospun cellulose acetate/silver-sulfadiazine nanofibers composites for wound dressings applications. Polym. Test. 2019, 74, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Luo, Y.; Wang, S.; Shen, M.; Qi, R.; Fang, Y.; Guo, R.; Cai, H.; Cao, X.; Tomas, H.; Zhu, M.; et al. Carbon nanotube-incorporated multilayered cellulose acetate nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Khoshnevisan, K.; Maleki, H.; Samadian, H.; Shahsavari, S.; Sarrafzadeh, M.H.; Larijani, B.; Dorkoosh, F.A.; Haghpanah, V.; Khorramizadeh, M.R. Cellulose acetate electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery systems: Applications and recent advances. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lv, H.; Guo, S.; Zhang, G.; He, W.; Wu, Y.; Yu, D.-G. Electrospun structural hybrids of acyclovir-polyacrylonitrile at acyclovir for modifying drug release. Polymers 2021, 13, 4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khoshnevisan, K.; Maleki, H.; Samadian, H.; Doostan, M.; Khorramizadeh, M.R. Antibacterial and antioxidant assessment of cellulose acetate/polycaprolactone nanofibrous mats impregnated with propolis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 1260–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sofi, H.S.; Akram, T.; Tamboli, A.H.; Majeed, A.; Shabir, N.; Sheikh, F.A. Novel lavender oil and silver nanoparticles simultaneously loaded onto polyurethane nanofibers for wound-healing applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 569, 118590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ardekani, N.T.; Khorram, M.; Zomorodian, K.; Yazdanpanah, S.; Veisi, H.; Veisi, H. Evaluation of electrospun poly (vinyl alcohol)-based nanofiber mats incorporated with Zataria multiflora essential oil as potential wound dressing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Unalan, I.; Endlein, S.J.; Slavik, B.; Buettner, A.; Goldmann, W.H.; Detsch, R.; Boccaccini, A.R. Evaluation of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofiber mats containing clove essential oil for antibacterial wound dressing. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. García-Salinas, S.; Evangelopoulos, M.; Gámez-Herrera, E.; Arruebo, M.; Irusta, S.; Taraballi, F.; Mendoza, G.; Tasciotti, E. Electrospun anti-inflammatory patch loaded with essential oils for wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 577, 119067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hamad, A.; Khashan, K.S.; Hadi, A. Silver nanoparticles and silver ions as potential antibacterial agents. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 4811–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bruna, T.; Maldonado-Bravo, F.; Jara, P.; Caro, N. Silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gao, T.; Tian, C.; Ma, Z.; Chu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, P. Stem cell seeded and silver nanoparticles loaded bilayer PLGA/PVA dressings for wound healing. Macromol. Biosci. 2020, 20, 2000141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. El-Aassar, M.R.; Ibrahim, O.M.; Fouda, M.M.G.; El-Beheri, N.G.; Agwa, M.M. Wound healing of nanofiber comprising Polygalacturonic/Hyaluronic acid embedded silver nanoparticles: In-vitro and in-vivo studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Phan, D.-N.; Khan, M.Q.; Nguyen, V.-C.; Vu-Manh, H.; Dao, A.-T.; Thanh Thao, P.; Nguyen, N.-M.; Le, V.-T.; Ullah, A.; Khatri, M.; et al. Investigation of mechanical, chemical, and antibacterial properties of electrospun cellulose-based scaffolds containing orange essential oil and silver nanoparticles. Polymers 2022, 14, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Xu, H.; Zhang, F.; Wang, M.; Lv, H.; Yu, D.-G.; Liu, X.; Shen, H. Electrospun hierarchical structural films for effective wound healing. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 136, 212795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lee, H.; Nishino, M.; Sohn, D.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, I.S. Control of the morphology of cellulose acetate nanofibers via electrospinning. Cellulose 2018, 25, 2829–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tang, S.; Zheng, J. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles: Structural effects. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1701503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, C.; Ma, G.; Shang, Y.; Sun, Y. A comparative study of the antibacterial mechanisms of silver ion and silver nanoparticles by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc. 2016, 85, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Song, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Elfawal, G.; Wang, K.; Jiang, D.; Hong, H.; Wu, J.; He, C.; Mo, X.; et al. Transcutaneous tumor vaccination combined with anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody treatment produces a synergistic antitumor effect. Acta Biomater. 2022, 140, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zare, M.; Dziemidowicz, K.; Williams, G.R.; Ramakrishna, S. Encapsulation of pharmaceutical and nutraceutical active ingredients using electrospinning processes. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pola, C.C.; Medeiros, E.A.A.; Pereira, O.L.; Souza, V.G.L.; Otoni, C.G.; Camilloto, G.P.; Soares, N.F.F. Cellulose acetate active films incorporated with oregano (Origanum vulgare) essential oil and organophilic montmorillonite clay control the growth of phytopathogenic fungi. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2016, 9, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. de Oliveira, E.F.; Paula, H.C.B.; de Paula, R.C.M. Alginate/cashew gum nanoparticles for essential oil encapsulation. Colloids Surf. B 2014, 113, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Khan, A.U.; Nadeem, M.; Bhutto, M.A.; Yu, F.; Xie, X.; El-Hamshary, H.; El-Faham, A.; Ibrahim, U.A.; Mo, X. Physico-chemical and biological evaluation of PLCL/SF nanofibers loaded with oregano essential oil. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Ji, Y.; Xia, Q.; Cui, J.; Zhu, M.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gan, L.; Han, S. High pressure laminates reinforced with electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 254, 117461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tsioptsias, C.; Sakellariou, K.G.; Tsivintzelis, I.; Papadopoulou, L.; Panayiotou, C. Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate–Fe2O3 composite nanofibrous materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liao, N.; Unnithan, A.R.; Joshi, M.K.; Tiwari, A.P.; Hong, S.T.; Park, C.-H.; Kim, C.S. Electrospun bioactive poly (ɛ-caprolactone)–cellulose acetate–dextran antibacterial composite mats for wound dressing applications. Colloids Surf. A 2015, 469, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kwiatkowski, P.; Lopusiewicz, L.; Kostek, M.; Drozlowska, E.; Pruss, A.; Wojciuk, B.; Sienkiewicz, M.; Zielinska-Blizniewska, H.; Dolegowska, B. The antibacterial activity of lavender essential oil alone and in combination with octenidine dihydrochloride against MRSA strains. Molecules 2020, 25, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Yuan, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Cui, B. Physicochemical characterization and antibacterial activity assessment of lavender essential oil encapsulated in hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 130, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wu, K.; Lin, Y.; Chai, X.; Duan, X.; Zhao, X.; Chun, C. Mechanisms of vapor-phase antibacterial action of essential oil from Cinnamomum camphora var. linaloofera Fujita against Escherichia coli. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2546–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparing solutions, side-by-side electrospinning process and Janus fiber.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparing solutions, side-by-side electrospinning process and Janus fiber.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic and (b,c) photographs of the Janus; (d) image of the complete electrospinning apparatus; (e) Photograph of the Taylor cone obtained with two working fluids; (f) photograph of the working fluids; (g) digital image of the electrospinning process.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic and (b,c) photographs of the Janus; (d) image of the complete electrospinning apparatus; (e) Photograph of the Taylor cone obtained with two working fluids; (f) photograph of the working fluids; (g) digital image of the electrospinning process.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the fibers: (a,b) F1; (d,e) F2; (g,h) F3; (j,k) F4. (c,f,i,l) are the distributions of fiber diameter determined from (b,e,h,k), respectively.
Figure 3. SEM images of the fibers: (a,b) F1; (d,e) F2; (g,h) F3; (j,k) F4. (c,f,i,l) are the distributions of fiber diameter determined from (b,e,h,k), respectively.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g003
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) F1 and (b) F4. Scale bars are 500 nm. Enlarged SEM images of (c) F2 and (d) F3. Scale bars are 1 μm.
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) F1 and (b) F4. Scale bars are 500 nm. Enlarged SEM images of (c) F2 and (d) F3. Scale bars are 1 μm.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g004
Figure 5. (a) Solidification process of working fluid along with side-by-side electrospinning; (b) charge distribution on the surface of this work compared with traditional side-by-side electrospinning.
Figure 5. (a) Solidification process of working fluid along with side-by-side electrospinning; (b) charge distribution on the surface of this work compared with traditional side-by-side electrospinning.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g005
Figure 6. (a) XRD patterns of the raw materials and fibers. Inset: photographs of the raw materials; (b) FTIR results of raw materials and nanofibers; (c) Structural formula of PCL, CA and two main components of LO; (d) TGA diagram of four prepared fiber membranes.
Figure 6. (a) XRD patterns of the raw materials and fibers. Inset: photographs of the raw materials; (b) FTIR results of raw materials and nanofibers; (c) Structural formula of PCL, CA and two main components of LO; (d) TGA diagram of four prepared fiber membranes.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g006
Figure 7. (a) Water contact angle tests of four kinds of Janus fiber; (b) moisture retention test for F1.
Figure 7. (a) Water contact angle tests of four kinds of Janus fiber; (b) moisture retention test for F1.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g007
Figure 8. Antibacterial effects of the formulations. (a) Histogram and (b) photographs of the zones of inhibition.
Figure 8. Antibacterial effects of the formulations. (a) Histogram and (b) photographs of the zones of inhibition.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g008
Figure 9. Antibacterial mechanism of prepared Janus nanofiber.
Figure 9. Antibacterial mechanism of prepared Janus nanofiber.
Pharmaceutics 14 01208 g009
Table 1. Details of the working solutions used in this work.
Table 1. Details of the working solutions used in this work.
NO.Fluid1Fluid2
F110% (w/v) PCL10% (w/v) CA
F210% (w/v) PCL + 6% (v/v) LO10% (w/v) CA
F310% (w/v) PCL10% (w/v) CA + 4% (w/v) Ag NPs
F410% (w/v) PCL + 6% (v/v) LO10% (w/v) CA + 4% (w/v) Ag NPs
Table 2. Theoretical amounts of Ag NPs and LO in four different nanofibers.
Table 2. Theoretical amounts of Ag NPs and LO in four different nanofibers.
NO.Fluid1Fluid2LO
(w/w, %)
Ag NPs
(w/w, %)
F110% (w/v) PCL10% (w/v) CA00
F210% (w/v) PCL + 6% (v/v) LO10% (w/v) CA20.90
F310% (w/v) PCL10% (w/v) CA + 4% (w/v) Ag NPs016.7
F410% (w/v) PCL + 6% (v/v) LO10% (w/v) CA + 4% (w/v) Ag NPs18.113.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.; Yu, D.-G.; Williams, G.R.; Bligh, S.W.A. Co-Loading of Inorganic Nanoparticles and Natural Oil in the Electrospun Janus Nanofibers for a Synergetic Antibacterial Effect. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061208

AMA Style

Wang M, Yu D-G, Williams GR, Bligh SWA. Co-Loading of Inorganic Nanoparticles and Natural Oil in the Electrospun Janus Nanofibers for a Synergetic Antibacterial Effect. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(6):1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Menglong, Deng-Guang Yu, Gareth R. Williams, and Sim Wan Annie Bligh. 2022. "Co-Loading of Inorganic Nanoparticles and Natural Oil in the Electrospun Janus Nanofibers for a Synergetic Antibacterial Effect" Pharmaceutics 14, no. 6: 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop