Next Article in Journal
An Adaptive Biosystems Engineering Approach towards Modeling the Soluble-to-Insoluble Phase Transition of Clofazimine
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Naringin and Naringenin Extraction from Citrus × paradisi L. Using Hydrolysis and Excipients as Adsorbent
Previous Article in Journal
Active Targeted Nanoformulations via Folate Receptors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Topical Administration of Drugs Incorporated in Carriers Containing Phospholipid Soft Vesicles for the Treatment of Skin Medical Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/pharmaceutics14010016
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Adipose-Derived Biogenic Nanoparticle-Associated microRNA-451a on Toll-like Receptor 4-Induced Cytokines

by
Xinghua Wang
1,†,
Anthony Pham
1,†,
Lu Kang
2,†,
Sierra A. Walker
1,
Irina Davidovich
3,
Dalila Iannotta
1,
Sarvam P. TerKonda
4,
Shane Shapiro
5,6,
Yeshayahu Talmon
3,
Si Pham
2,* and
Joy Wolfram
1,7,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
2
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
3
Department of Chemical Engineering and the Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel
4
Department of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
5
Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
6
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
7
Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010016
Submission received: 31 October 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 20 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Women in Pharmaceutics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-released nanoparticles that transfer biomolecular content between cells. Among EV-associated biomolecules, microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) represent one of the most important modulators of signaling pathways in recipient cells. Previous studies have shown that EVs from adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and adipose tissue modulate inflammatory pathways in macrophages. In this study, the effects of miRNAs that are abundant in adipose tissue EVs and other biogenic nanoparticles (BiNPs) were assessed in terms of altering Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-induced cytokines. TLR-4 signaling in macrophages is often triggered by pathogen or damage-induced inflammation and is associated with several diseases. This study demonstrates that miR-451a, which is abundant in adipose tissue BiNPs, suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines and increases anti-inflammatory cytokines associated with the TLR4 pathway. Therefore, miR-451a may be partially responsible for immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue-derived BiNPs.

1. Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are biogenic nanoparticles (BiNPs) that are released by cells into the extracellular space, and can be found in all tissues and bodily fluids [1]. EVs are involved in (patho)physiological intercellular communication via the transportation of nucleic acids [2], proteins [3], lipids [4], and carbohydrates [5] to recipient cells. In many cases, the biophysical and molecular properties of EVs mediate cell and tissue-specific interactions, enabling targeted delivery of biomolecular cargo [6,7,8]. The ability of EVs to mediate site-specific delivery of endogenous and exogenous bioactive cargo make them promising for therapeutic applications [1]. In particular, EVs have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality for diseases involving inflammation, such as organ ischemia injury, graft-versus-host disease, liver failure, dermatological conditions, and chronic kidney disease [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The aforementioned therapeutic strategies rely on cultured cells, such as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), as a source material for EVs. However, cell culture has many disadvantages, including low EV yields and expensive, time-consuming protocols for cell expansion [15]. The circumvention of cell culture by using EVs directly obtained from tissues and bodily fluids, including plasma and adipose tissue, is a time-efficient and cost-effective approach to obtain large quantities of EVs [15]. However, it is worth noting that isolation of EVs from tissue and bodily fluids usually results in contamination with other BiNPs, primarily lipoproteins [15]. Therefore, the term BiNP more accurately depicts the entire extracellular, nanosized content of adipose tissue.
Previously, it was shown that adipose tissue-derived BiNPs, including EVs, collected from patients undergoing liposuction, have protective and anti-inflammatory effects in macrophages [16]. Specifically, these BiNPs were shown to suppress the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 pathway, which is often triggered by pathogen or damage-induced inflammation [17]. Stimuli, such as infections, tissue injury, and the presence of foreign bodies or irritants can activate TLRs in immune cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, triggering the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [17]. TLR4 has been closely linked to the development of inflammatory cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancer [18,19,20,21].
Among cargo molecules in EVs, microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are thought to be one of the primary mediators of physiological function [22,23,24]. These biomolecules are a class of endogenous, evolutionarily conserved, short non-coding RNAs that act post-transcriptionally as regulators of messenger RNA (mRNA) to protein translation. The first miRNA, lin-4, was originally discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans in 1993 by Lee and colleagues and was essential for lin-14 gene regulation in postembryonic developmental events [25,26]. After the discovery of lin-4, additional miRNAs have been found and investigated in most eukaryotes, including humans [27,28]. According to a recent release of miRBase (Release 22), 38,589 total and 1917 different human miRNAs have been reported to date [29]. It is predicted that more than 60% of all human protein-coding genes have been under selective pressure to maintain pairing to miRNAs [28]. Evidence highlights the pivotal roles of miRNAs in various biological and pathogenic processes, including inflammation. To date, several miRNAs related to the inflammatory response have been identified, such as miR-10, miR-146, miR-155, and miR-130b [30,31,32,33,34]. In this study, the effects of miRNAs that are abundant in adipose tissue BiNPs were assessed in terms of altering TLR4-induced cytokines in macrophages.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

The murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA), maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin and cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
The collection of residual de-identified subcutaneous adipose tissue from healthy, non-obese patients undergoing a liposuction procedure (lipoaspirate) was approved by the Mayo Clinic Biospecimens Review Group (ID:17-010290), and performed as previously described [16]. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were isolated from microfragmented adipose tissue samples, cultured in advanced minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 5.35% PLTMax Human Platelet Lysate (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA), 0.2% heparin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% glutamax (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and characterized as previously described [16]. MSC-EVs were isolated from conditioned cell culture media at passage four in medium without PLTMax and heparin using tangential flow filtration (TFF), as previously described and validated [16,35,36,37].

2.2. Lipoaspirate Processing

Lipoaspirate was obtained as outlined in the cell culture section and as previously described [16]. Following removal of the cell content, the liquid samples underwent TFF to obtain EVs and other BiNPs.

2.3. Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

The size distribution and particle concentration of isolated BiNPs were determined with NTA. Samples were diluted (1:100) in phosphate buffered saline and analyzed with a Nanosight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, United Kingdom), using the following measurement settings: three replicates with measurement time at 60 s.

2.4. Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (cryo-TEM)

Adipose tissue BiNPs and adipose-derived MSC EVs were imaged by cryo-TEM, as previously described [16]. Specimen preparation was carried out in a controlled environment vitrification system (CEVS) at 25 °C and 100% relative humidity. A small volume (3 µL) of BiNPs (1010/mL) was placed on a carbon-coated perforated polymer film, mounted on a 200 mesh TEM grid, as previously described [14]. To thin the drop into the film, excess solution was blotted away with a filter paper-covered metal strip. The grid was plunged into freezing liquid ethane (−183 °C), and transferred under liquid nitrogen into a Gatan 626 (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA) cryo-holder. The grid was imaged at −175 °C in an FEI (now Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) Talos 200C high-resolution TEM at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Images were recorded digitally by an FEI Falcon III. A Volta “phase-plate” that converts image phase differences into amplitude differences was used to enhance image contrast.

2.5. Western Blot Analysis

The protein content of the BiNPs was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Equal amounts of sample protein were mixed with 6x reducing sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) sample loading buffer (Boston Bioproducts, Ashland, MA, USA) and heated at 95 °C for 5 minutes. A control was prepared from MSCs lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Proteins from samples (14.2 µg/well) were separated via gel electrophoresis using 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gels (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). After blocking in 5% milk (w/v) in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% tween (TBST), the membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies in 1% milk in TBST (w/v): anti-CD81 mouse monoclonal (1:500; Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-CD9 mouse monoclonal (1:500; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-CD63 rabbit monoclonal (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), anti-annexin V rabbit polyclonal (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and anti-calnexin rabbit monoclonal (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The membranes were incubated with the following secondary antibodies: rabbit polyclonal secondary antibody to mouse, and goat polyclonal secondary antibody to rabbit (all horseradish peroxidase, HRP-conjugated), at 1:3000 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Antibodies were detected by chemiluminescence (SuperSignal West Femto, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Imaging analysis was performed with the myECL Imager (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.6. Lipoprotein Quantification

The presence of lipoprotein contaminants, such as low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in BiNP samples (1010/mL) were assessed using a cholesterol assay kit (ab65390; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Commercial LDL (ab91115; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) was used as a positive control.

2.7. RNA Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

The miRNA content of donor-matched adipose tissue BiNPs and adipose-derived MSC EVs was assessed by QIAGEN Genomic Services (Hilden, Germany) through NGS. RNA was isolated using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and library preparation was done using the QIAseq miRNA Library Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA (5 μL) was converted into miRNA NGS libraries and adapters containing unique molecular identifiers were ligated to the RNA. Then RNA was converted to cDNA and amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (22 cycles) and during the PCR indices were added. Samples were purified after PCR and library preparation quality control was performed using either TapeStation 4200 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Library pool(s) were quantified using quantitative PCR and sequenced on a NextSeq500 sequencing instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.8. Quantitative Real-Time (qRT)-PCR

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in 12-well plates in complete medium and transfected with a miR-451a mimic, miR-16-5p mimic, miR-451a inhibitor, or respective negative controls (NCs) (230 nM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After six hours, cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and stimulated with 500 ng/mL LPS (TLR4 ligand) for 4–24 h. Total RNA was isolated from RAW 264.7 cells with the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or from donor-matched adipose-derived MSC EVs and adipose tissue-derived BiNPs (100 µL) using the TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 25 pmol of synthetic cel-miR-39 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), which was used for normalization of RNA isolation and reverse transcription efficiency. RNA quantification and purity was assessed using NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RAW 264.7 mRNA for inflammatory cytokines (1 μg) and EV/BiNP miRNAs (100 ng) were reverse transcribed into the first-strand cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). qRT-PCR analysis for Raw 264.7 cytokine mRNAs and BiNP miRNAs (miR-451a and miR-16-5p) was performed with a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Values were normalized to S26 and cel-miR-39/U6 according to the 2−ΔΔCt method in order to calculate the relative RAW 264.7 mRNA and EV/BiNP miRNA expression levels, respectively. All primers are listed in Table 1.

2.9. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in 12-well plates in complete medium and transfected with a miR-451a mimic, miR-451a inhibitor, and respective negative controls (NCs) (350 nM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After six hours, cells were washed with PBS and stimulated with 500 ng/mL LPS (TLR4 ligand) for 48 h. EV/BiNP studies were performed as described above, with the exception of washing cells with PBS and adding EVs/BiNPs (109/mL) three hours after transfection. Cell culture medium was collected, centrifuged (206× g at 4 °C for 10 min), aliquoted, and immediately stored at −80 °C. The medium was thawed on ice and IL-10 (#M1000B, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and TNFα (#MTA00B, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) ELISAs were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance at 450 nm was read with a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Adipose-Derived MSC EVs and Adipose Tissue-Derived BiNPs

Adipose tissue BiNPs were isolated from cell-depleted lipoaspirate, and adipose-derived MSC EVs were isolated from conditioned medium by TFF. BiNPs/EVs were characterized in accordance with the 2018 minimal information for studies of EVs (MISEV) guidelines [38]. NTA of donor-matched MSC EVs and adipose tissue BiNPs showed similar size distribution profiles ranging from 40–400 nm with most particles in the 80–280 nm range (Figure 1A). Cryo-TEM showed that BiNPs from both sources had a lipid bilayer, which is a key attribute for the authentication of EVs (Figure 1B).
Analysis of EV markers by Western blot revealed the presence of EV-associated transmembrane and cytoplasmic proteins, such as CD9 and annexin V (Figure 1C). The adipose tissue BiNPs displayed a greater variety and higher levels of EV markers compared to MSC EVs when normalized to protein content (Figure 1C). On the contrary, when samples were normalized according to particle number, markers on MSC EVs were enriched [16]. The particle/protein ratio is substantially higher for adipose tissue BiNPs [16], which is a likely explanation for this discrepancy. The intracellular contaminant marker, calnexin, was absent in MSC EVs, while the adipose tissue BiNPs showed much lower expression of calnexin compared to cell homogenate (Figure 1C). It is likely that a small proportion of cells were lysed during the lipoaspiration procedure, resulting in low levels of calnexin, which has also been shown in a previous study [35].

3.2. Adipose Tissue BiNPs Contain Higher Levels of miR-451a and miR-16-5p Compared to MSC EVs

NGS results shed light on the ten most abundant miRNAs in adipose tissue BiNPs (Table 2). A literature search and gene ontology (GO) analysis of these top ten miRNAs revealed that miR-16-5p and miR-451a (among the three most highly expressed) have previously been shown to suppress TLR-4-induced inflammation in epithelial and microglial cells, respectively (Table 2). The relative abundance of miRNA-451a and miRNA-16-5p was much higher in adipose tissue BiNPs compared to donor-matched MSC EVs (Table 2). qRT-PCR validation demonstrated that this was the case for three different donor-matched BiNP/EV samples (Figure 2A,B).
It is important to note that EVs and lipoprotein overlap in size and density [39], making it very challenging to separate these two biogenic nanoparticles. Adipose tissue BiNP samples have previously been found to contain apolipoproteins (apo) [16]; however, recent studies have demonstrated that these proteins can be part of the EV protein corona [40], which does not necessarily indicate the presence of intact lipoproteins. Therefore, in this study, an assay that assesses LDL/VLDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol was performed. The upper limit of apoB-100 (LDL protein component) in the plasma of healthy individuals is 1000 μg/mL [41], and is likely to be similar in the interstitial fluid of adipose tissue. Therefore, commercial LDL at half of this concentration (500 μg/mL apoB-100) was assessed for comparative purposes. The results indicate that the adipose tissue BiNP samples have two-fold higher LDL cholesterol levels compared to MSC EVs, although the difference is not statistically significant (Figure 3). The LDL cholesterol levels in adipose tissue BiNPs is 1% of the upper limit in the circulation of healthy individuals (Figure 3), indicating that the vast majority of these lipoproteins are removed during BiNP isolation. The adipose tissue BiNPs also displayed three-fold higher HDL cholesterol levels compared to MSC-EVs (Figure 3). MSCs do not produce LDL or HDL, so the residual levels detected in the assay may be cholesterol associated with the lipid bilayer of EVs, or alternatively, lipoproteins that were internalized by cells during earlier passages when exposed to platelet lysate, and later secreted into the medium (cells were grown without platelet lysate for the EV collection passage). Taken together, it is possible that miRNA-451a and miRNA-16-5p in the adipose tissue samples are associated with both EVs and lipoproteins. Nevertheless, the samples lack smaller miRNA complexes, as tangential flow filtration is an effective method for isolating particles in the size range of 60–600 nm [35]. It is worth nothing that the detected miR-451a and miR-16-5p could be associated with EVs in various ways, as it is currently unknown to what extent miRNAs are present in the EV interior versus being bound to the exterior surface [42]. In any case, detected miRNAs are protected from enzymatic degradation, as ribonuclease activity is high in interstitial fluid [43].
The two miRNAs (miRNA-451a and miRNA-16-5p) were selected for further assessment of TLR4 effects in macrophages, as adipose tissue BiNPs have previously been shown to suppress TLR4-induced cytokine secretion in these cells [16]. Additionally, nanosized particles, including EVs, accumulate primarily in macrophages upon intravenous administration [14,44,45,46,47], indicating the importance of studying the effects of BiNPs on this cell type.

3.3. Effects of miR-451a and miR-16-5p on the Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines in LPS-Stimulated Macrophages

Macrophages play a central role in inflammation by releasing proinflammatory cytokines and other soluble inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), which can activate endothelial cells [59,60]. The anti-inflammatory effects of adipose tissue BiNP-enriched miRNAs (miR-451a and miR-16-5p) on inflammatory responses in LPS (TLR4 ligand)-induced macrophages were assessed using lipofectamine transfected mimics (chemically synthesized). Previous studies have demonstrated that the effects of adipose tissue BiNPs in endotoxin-stimulated primary human macrophages (differentiated from monocytes) are similar to those in RAW 264.7 macrophages [16], therefore, the latter cell line was used in this study for practical reasons. Optimization studies in RAW 264.7 cells were performed to evaluate which cytokines are most highly elevated in response to LPS. Based on these optimization studies, TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 were selected secondary to robust TLR4-induced cytokine expression (Figure 4A–D).
The presence of intracellular miR-451a and miR-16-5p mimics following transfection was verified by qRT-PCR (Figure 5A,B). The inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, was significantly reduced at both time points upon exposure to miR-451a, while miR-16-5p did not alter the levels of this cytokine (Figure 5C). The levels of LPS-induced IL-1β remained unchanged in response to both mimics (Figure 5D), while IL-6 was slightly increased by both mimics at the shorter time point (eight hours) (Figure 5E). The miR-451a mimic substantially increased the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, at both time points, while the miR-16-5p mimic did so to a lesser extent at the eight-hour time point (Figure 5F). These results demonstrate that miR-451a suppresses inflammatory cytokine secretion (TNF-α) caused by the TLR4 activation and increases anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion (IL-10); whereas miR-16-5p has minimal effects on LPS-induced cytokine secretion in RAW 264.7 cells. It is worth noting that the lack of miR-16-5p effects could be due to the modest increase in expression (2.5-fold) compared to control cells. Previous studies have shown that miR-16-5p mimics typically result in a modest 1.5-3.5-fold increase in expression in various cell lines [61,62,63,64], which is likely to be due to relatively high endogenous expression of this miR.

3.4. Effects of miR-451a Inhibition on IL-10 and TNF-α in LPS-Stimulated Macrophages Treated with MSC EVs and Adipose Tissue BiNPs

Previous studies have demonstrated that MSC EVs and adipose tissue BiNPs can modulate inflammatory pathways in macrophages [16,65,66]. The contribution of miR-451a to BiNP effects on LPS-stimulated macrophages was assessed using a potent steric blocking oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-451a. Similar to the qRT-PCR studies, the miR-451a mimic increased protein levels of IL-10 (Figure 6A) and decreased protein levels of TNF-α in LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells (Figure 6B). The observed miR-451a mimic-induced increase in IL-10 and decrease in TNF-α were reversed in the presence of a miR-451a steric blocking oligonucleotide inhibitor (Figure 6A,B).
Cells were then treated with BiNPs and the miR-451a inhibitor to assess effects on IL-10 and TNF-α. The results revealed that the levels of IL-10 decreased when cells were exposed to adipose tissue BiNPs in the presence of the miR-451a inhibitor, while IL-10 levels in cells exposed to MSC EVs did not change significantly in the presence of the inhibitor (Figure 6C). A similar effect was observed with TNF-α levels, where the miR-451a inhibitor reversed the effects of adipose tissue BiNPs, but failed to cause a significant change in cells exposed to MSC EVs (Figure 6D). Taken together, these results indicate that miR-451a plays a role in adipose tissue BiNP-mediated effects in TLR4-stimulated macrophages. On the contrary, the inhibitor did not cause significant changes in cells treated with donor-matched MSC EVs, which is most likely due to miR-451 being much less abundant in these EVs.

4. Conclusions

Inflammation is an essential immune response to injury and infection contributing to the protection of the body and tissue healing. However, excessive/chronic inflammatory responses are detrimental to tissue function and have been associated with many severe diseases [67]. While the inflammatory response involves complex signaling pathways with several potential points of regulation, research in the past decade has emphasized the potential of TLRs as therapeutic targets [17]. Two of the most highly expressed miRNAs in adipose tissue BiNPs, miR-451a and miR-16-5p, have previously been found to suppress TLR4-induced cytokines in microglial cells [49] and lung epithelial cells [48], respectively. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of these two miRNAs on TLR4-mediated cytokine secretion in macrophages and to determine whether they could be partially responsible for adipose tissue BiNP-mediated immunomodulatory effects. The results indicate that the presence of miR-451a produces a significant suppression of an LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α) and a significant increase in an anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10), while miR-16-5p does not have any substantial effects on cytokine expression. The use of a potent steric inhibitor reversed the effects of the miR-451a mimic and altered the anti-inflammatory effects of adipose tissue BiNPs. The inhibitor failed to significantly alter the effects of donor-matched MSC EVs, which contain substantially lower levels of miR-451a. Although both MSC EVs and adipose tissue BiNPs have been shown to modulate inflammatory pathways in macrophages [16,65,66], these effects are likely to be mediated by distinct biomolecular cargo.
BiNPs from fresh adipose tissue are attractive for clinical applications, as isolation is easier, faster, and more cost-efficient compared to MSC-derived EVs [15]. Anti-inflammatory effects mediated by BiNP-associated miR-451a could be beneficial for prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury of organs, including donor organs used for transplantation [12]. Other potential clinical applications include attenuation of neointimal formation after vascular injury to prevent in-stent restenosis, and other occlusive vascular diseases [68]. The results of this study warrant further investigation into miR-451a as a mediator of immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue BiNPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W., S.P. and J.W.; investigation, X.W., A.P., L.K., S.A.W., I.D. and D.I.; resources, S.P.T., S.S., Y.T., S.P. and J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W., A.P. and J.W.; writing—review and editing, all authors; supervision, Y.T., S.P. and J.W.; project administration, S.P. and J.W.; funding acquisition, S.S., S.P., J.W. and D.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is partially supported by the Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine in Florida (J.W., S.P.), the Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery (J.W.), the Erik Compton Foundation (S.P.), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award numbers R21AI152318 (J.W.), the American Heart Association under award number 20TPA35490415 (J.W.), and Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Innovazione, Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, Italy, under award number DOT13A8025 (D.I., J.W.). The cryo-TEM work was performed at the Technion Center for Electron Microscopy of Soft Matter. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Biospecimens Review Group (ID:17-010290), and is not considered huma subject research, as residual, de-identified waste samples were used.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Andaloussi, S.E.L.; Mager, I.; Breakefield, X.O.; Wood, M.J. Extracellular vesicles: Biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hunter, M.P.; Ismail, N.; Zhang, X.; Aguda, B.D.; Lee, E.J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, T.; Schafer, J.; Lee, M.L.; Schmittgen, T.D.; et al. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bastos-Amador, P.; Royo, F.; Gonzalez, E.; Conde-Vancells, J.; Palomo-Diez, L.; Borras, F.E.; Falcon-Perez, J.M. Proteomic analysis of microvesicles from plasma of healthy donors reveals high individual variability. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 3574–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, S.; Datta-Chaudhuri, A.; Deme, P.; Dickens, A.; Dastgheyb, R.; Bhargava, P.; Bi, H.; Haughey, N.J. Lipidomic characterization of extracellular vesicles in human serum. J. Circ. Biomark. 2019, 8, 1849454419879848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Walker, S.A.; Aguilar Diaz De Leon, J.S.; Busatto, S.; Wurtz, G.A.; Zubair, A.C.; Borges, C.R.; Wolfram, J. Glycan Node Analysis of Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Cells 2020, 9, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Busatto, S.; Pham, A.; Suh, A.; Shapiro, S.; Wolfram, J. Organotropic drug delivery: Synthetic nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. Biomed. Microdevices 2019, 21, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Witwer, K.W.; Wolfram, J. Extracellular vesicles versus synthetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walker, S.; Busatto, S.; Pham, A.; Tian, M.; Suh, A.; Carson, K.; Quintero, A.; Lafrence, M.; Malik, H.; Santana, M.X.; et al. Extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Theranostics 2019, 9, 8001–8017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elsharkasy, O.M.; Nordin, J.Z.; Hagey, D.W.; de Jong, O.G.; Schiffelers, R.M.; Andaloussi, S.E.; Vader, P. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: Why and how? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 159, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kordelas, L.; Rebmann, V.; Ludwig, A.K.; Radtke, S.; Ruesing, J.; Doeppner, T.R.; Epple, M.; Horn, P.A.; Beelen, D.W.; Giebel, B. MSC-derived exosomes: A novel tool to treat therapy-refractory graft-versus-host disease. Leukemia 2014, 28, 970–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nassar, W.; El-Ansary, M.; Sabry, D.; Mostafa, M.A.; Fayad, T.; Kotb, E.; Temraz, M.; Saad, A.N.; Essa, W.; Adel, H. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles can safely ameliorate the progression of chronic kidney diseases. Biomater. Res. 2016, 20, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ali, M.; Pham, A.; Wang, X.; Wolfram, J.; Pham, S. Extracellular vesicles for treatment of solid organ ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3294–3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suh, A.; Pham, A.; Cress, M.J.; Pincelli, T.; TerKonda, S.P.; Bruce, A.J.; Zubair, A.C.; Wolfram, J.; Shapiro, S.A. Adipose-derived cellular and cell-derived regenerative therapies in dermatology and aesthetic rejuvenation. Ageing Res. Rev. 2019, 54, 100933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Borrelli, D.A.; Yankson, K.; Shukla, N.; Vilanilam, G.; Ticer, T.; Wolfram, J. Extracellular vesicle therapeutics for liver disease. J. Control. Release 2018, 273, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iannotta, D.; Yang, M.; Celia, C.; Di Marzio, L.; Wolfram, J. Extracellular vesicle therapeutics from plasma and adipose tissue. Nano Today 2021, 39, 101159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tian, M.; Ticer, T.; Wang, Q.; Walker, S.; Pham, A.; Suh, A.; Busatto, S.; Davidovich, I.; Al-Kharboosh, R.; Lewis-Tuffin, L.; et al. Adipose-Derived Biogenic Nanoparticles for Suppression of Inflammation. Small 2020, 16, 1904064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hennessy, E.J.; Parker, A.E.; O’Neill, L.A.J. Targeting Toll-like receptors: Emerging therapeutics? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arumugam, T.V.; Okun, E.; Tang, S.C.; Thundyil, J.; Taylor, S.M.; Woodruff, T.M. Toll-like receptors in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock 2009, 32, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Arslan, F.; Keogh, B.; McGuirk, P.; Parker, A.E. TLR2 and TLR4 in ischemia reperfusion injury. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 704202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Esquela-Kerscher, A.; Slack, F.J. Oncomirs—microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Perron, M.P.; Provost, P. Protein interactions and complexes in human microRNA biogenesis and function. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 2537–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Seo, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Hong, I.S. Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Immunomodulatory Therapeutics. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 5126156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pers, Y.M.; Maumus, M.; Bony, C.; Jorgensen, C.; Noel, D. Contribution of microRNAs to the immunosuppressive function of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochimie 2018, 155, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. O’Brien, K.; Breyne, K.; Ughetto, S.; Laurent, L.C.; Breakefield, X.O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wightman, B.; Ha, I.; Ruvkun, G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 1993, 75, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, R.C.; Feinbaum, R.L.; Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993, 75, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.W.; Wei, L.; Han, Z.; Chen, Z. Mesenchymal stromal cells-derived exosomes alleviate ischemia/reperfusion injury in mouse lung by transporting anti-apoptotic miR-21-5p. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 852, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Friedman, R.C.; Farh, K.K.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, D.P. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kozomara, A.; Birgaoanu, M.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 47, D155–D162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tahamtan, A.; Teymoori-Rad, M.; Nakstad, B.; Salimi, V. Anti-Inflammatory MicroRNAs and Their Potential for Inflammatory Diseases Treatment. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Qin, B.; Yang, H.; Xiao, B. Role of microRNAs in endothelial inflammation and senescence. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 4509–4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Taganov, K.D.; Boldin, M.P.; Chang, K.J.; Baltimore, D. NF-kappaB-dependent induction of microRNA miR-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12481–12486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. O’Connell, R.M.; Taganov, K.D.; Boldin, M.P.; Cheng, G.; Baltimore, D. MicroRNA-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1604–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Rieger, J.K.; Reutter, S.; Hofmann, U.; Schwab, M.; Zanger, U.M. Inflammation-associated microRNA-130b down-regulates cytochrome P450 activities and directly targets CYP2C9. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2015, 43, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Busatto, S.; Vilanilam, G.; Ticer, T.; Lin, W.L.; Dickson, D.W.; Shapiro, S.; Bergese, P.; Wolfram, J. Tangential Flow Filtration for Highly Efficient Concentration of Extracellular Vesicles from Large Volumes of Fluid. Cells 2018, 7, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Busatto, S.; Yang, Y.; Walker, S.A.; Davidovich, I.; Lin, W.H.; Lewis-Tuffin, L.; Anastasiadis, P.Z.; Sarkaria, J.; Talmon, Y.; Wurtz, G.; et al. Brain metastases-derived extracellular vesicles induce binding and aggregation of low-density lipoprotein. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 18, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Busatto, S.; Iannotta, D.; Walker, S.A.; Di Marzio, L.; Wolfram, J. A Simple and Quick Method for Loading Proteins in Extracellular Vesicles. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Busatto, S.; Walker, S.A.; Grayson, W.; Pham, A.; Tian, M.; Nesto, N.; Barklund, J.; Wolfram, J. Lipoprotein-based drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 159, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Toth, E.A.; Turiak, L.; Visnovitz, T.; Cserep, C.; Mazlo, A.; Sodar, B.W.; Forsonits, A.I.; Petovari, G.; Sebestyen, A.; Komlosi, Z.; et al. Formation of a protein corona on the surface of extracellular vesicles in blood plasma. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cao, J.; Steffen, B.T.; Guan, W.; Remaley, A.T.; McConnell, J.P.; Palamalai, V.; Tsai, M.Y. A comparison of three apolipoprotein B methods and their associations with incident coronary heart disease risk over a 12-year follow-up period: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2018, 12, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Geekiyanage, H.; Rayatpisheh, S.; Wohlschlegel, J.A.; Brown, R., Jr.; Ambros, V. Extracellular microRNAs in human circulation are associated with miRISC complexes that are accessible to anti-AGO2 antibody and can bind target mimic oligonucleotides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 24213–24223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bender, A.T.; Sullivan, B.P.; Lillis, L.; Posner, J.D. Enzymatic and Chemical-Based Methods to Inactivate Endogenous Blood Ribonucleases for Nucleic Acid Diagnostics. J. Mol. Diagn. 2020, 22, 1030–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Samuelsson, E.; Shen, H.; Blanco, E.; Ferrari, M.; Wolfram, J. Contribution of Kupffer cells to liposome accumulation in the liver. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 158, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wolfram, J.; Nizzero, S.; Liu, H.; Li, F.; Zhang, G.; Li, Z.; Shen, H.; Blanco, E.; Ferrari, M. A chloroquine-induced macrophage-preconditioning strategy for improved nanodelivery. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pelt, J.; Busatto, S.; Ferrari, M.; Thompson, E.A.; Mody, K.; Wolfram, J. Chloroquine and nanoparticle drug delivery: A promising combination. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 191, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Khalid, A.; Persano, S.; Shen, H.; Zhao, Y.; Blanco, E.; Ferrari, M.; Wolfram, J. Strategies for improving drug delivery: Nanocarriers and microenvironmental priming. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2016, 14, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, Y.; Yang, F.; Yu, X.; Wang, B.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, R.; Xia, S.; Zhou, X. miR-16 inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation by directly targeting TLR4 in acute lung injury. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 112, 108664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, X.; Zhang, H. miR-451 elevation relieves inflammatory pain by suppressing microglial activation-evoked inflammatory response via targeting TLR4. Cell Tissue Res. 2018, 374, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, J.S.; Du, J.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, X.Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.L. Exosomal miR-451 from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells attenuates burn-induced acute lung injury. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2019, 82, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, D. miR-143-3p impacts on pulmonary inflammatory factors and cell apoptosis in mice with mycoplasmal pneumonia by regulating TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20193419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guo, Z.; Cai, X.; Guo, X.; Xu, Y.; Gong, J.; Li, Y.; Zhu, W. Let-7b ameliorates Crohn’s disease-associated adherent-invasive E. coli induced intestinal inflammation via modulating Toll-Like Receptor 4 expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 156, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Teng, G.G.; Wang, W.H.; Dai, Y.; Wang, S.J.; Chu, Y.X.; Li, J. Let-7b is involved in the inflammation and immune responses associated with Helicobacter pylori infection by targeting Toll-like receptor 4. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, X.; Sun, Q.; Hu, W. Carvedilol Protects Against the H2O2-induced Cell Damages in Rat Myoblasts by Regulating the Circ_NFIX/miR-125b-5p/TLR4 Signal Axis. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 78, 604–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhong, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Li, J.; Cheng, G. Kaempferol alleviates ox-LDL-induced apoptosis by up-regulation of miR-26a-5p via inhibiting TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway in human endothelial cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kumar, A.; Bhatia, H.S.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Fiebich, B.L. microRNA-26a modulates inflammatory response induced by toll-like receptor 4 stimulation in microglia. J. Neurochem. 2015, 135, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xiang, W.; Tian, C.; Peng, S.; Zhou, L.; Pan, S.; Deng, Z. Let-7i attenuates human brain microvascular endothelial cell damage in oxygen glucose deprivation model by decreasing toll-like receptor 4 expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 493, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qi, M.; Yin, L.; Xu, L.; Tao, X.; Qi, Y.; Han, X.; Wang, C.; Xu, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, K.; et al. Dioscin alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory kidney injury via the microRNA let-7i/TLR4/MyD88 signaling pathway. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 111, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pober, J.S.; Cotran, R.S. Cytokines and endothelial cell biology. Physiol. Rev. 1990, 70, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Parameswaran, N.; Patial, S. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha signaling in macrophages. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2010, 20, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martinez, C.; Rodino-Janeiro, B.K.; Lobo, B.; Stanifer, M.L.; Klaus, B.; Granzow, M.; Gonzalez-Castro, A.M.; Salvo-Romero, E.; Alonso-Cotoner, C.; Pigrau, M.; et al. miR-16 and miR-125b are involved in barrier function dysregulation through the modulation of claudin-2 and cingulin expression in the jejunum in IBS with diarrhoea. Gut 2017, 66, 1537–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Yao, Q.; Xing, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liang, J.; Lin, Q.; Huang, M.; Chen, Y.; Lin, B.; Xu, X.; Chen, W. MiR-16-5p suppresses myofibroblast activation in systemic sclerosis by inhibiting NOTCH signaling. Aging 2020, 13, 2640–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Maximov, V.V.; Akkawi, R.; Khawaled, S.; Salah, Z.; Jaber, L.; Barhoum, A.; Or, O.; Galasso, M.; Kurek, K.C.; Yavin, E.; et al. MiR-16-1-3p and miR-16-2-3p possess strong tumor suppressive and antimetastatic properties in osteosarcoma. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 3052–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, G.P.; Wang, W.W.; Lu, W.Y.; Shang, A.Q. The mechanism of miR-16-5p protection on LPS-induced A549 cell injury by targeting CXCR3. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 1200–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Zhao, H.; Shang, Q.; Pan, Z.; Bai, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q. Exosomes From Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Attenuate Adipose Inflammation and Obesity Through Polarizing M2 Macrophages and Beiging in White Adipose Tissue. Diabetes 2018, 67, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Lo Sicco, C.; Reverberi, D.; Balbi, C.; Ulivi, V.; Principi, E.; Pascucci, L.; Becherini, P.; Bosco, M.C.; Varesio, L.; Franzin, C.; et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Anti-Inflammatory Effects: Endorsement of Macrophage Polarization. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Medzhitov, R. Inflammation 2010: New adventures of an old flame. Cell 2010, 140, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Pashova, A.; Work, L.M.; Nicklin, S.A. The role of extracellular vesicles in neointima formation post vascular injury. Cell. Signal. 2020, 76, 109783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g001 550
Figure 1. Characterization of donor-matched adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) and adipose tissue biogenic nanoparticles (BiNPs). (A) Size distribution determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis. (B) Morphological evaluation of EVs/BiNPs by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. Scale bars, 100 nm. (C) Protein characterization of EVs/BiNPs by Western blot (samples were normalized to protein concentration). CD, cluster of differentiation.
Figure 1. Characterization of donor-matched adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) and adipose tissue biogenic nanoparticles (BiNPs). (A) Size distribution determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis. (B) Morphological evaluation of EVs/BiNPs by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. Scale bars, 100 nm. (C) Protein characterization of EVs/BiNPs by Western blot (samples were normalized to protein concentration). CD, cluster of differentiation.
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g001
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g002 550
Figure 2. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) levels of microRNAs (miR)-16-5p and miR-451a in three donor-matched adipose-derived MSC EVs and adipose tissue BiNPs normalized for Cel-miR-39 (A) and U6 (B).
Figure 2. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) levels of microRNAs (miR)-16-5p and miR-451a in three donor-matched adipose-derived MSC EVs and adipose tissue BiNPs normalized for Cel-miR-39 (A) and U6 (B).
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g002
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g003 550
Figure 3. Cholesterol concentration associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in EV/BiNP samples. Commercial LDL at a concentration of 500 µg/mL apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB-100) was used as a positive control (1000 µg/mL of ApoB-100 is the upper limit in the plasma of healthy individuals). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Statistics by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0001. ns, not significant.
Figure 3. Cholesterol concentration associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in EV/BiNP samples. Commercial LDL at a concentration of 500 µg/mL apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB-100) was used as a positive control (1000 µg/mL of ApoB-100 is the upper limit in the plasma of healthy individuals). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Statistics by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0001. ns, not significant.
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g003
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g004 550
Figure 4. RNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (A), interleukin (IL)-1β (B), IL-6 (C), and IL-10 (D) in RAW 264.7 macrophages exposed to 500 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) of three replicates. Statistics by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 4. RNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (A), interleukin (IL)-1β (B), IL-6 (C), and IL-10 (D) in RAW 264.7 macrophages exposed to 500 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) of three replicates. Statistics by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. ***, p < 0.001.
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g004
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of miR-451a and miR-16-5p synthetic mimics on Raw 264.7 macrophages. (A,B) Intracellular levels of miR-451a and miR-16-5p after transfecting cells with miRNA mimics. (C–F) RNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 in the presence of miR-451a and miR-16-5p mimics in cells exposed to LPS. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. Statistics by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 in comparison to miR negative control (NC) without LPS unless otherwise indicated. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001 in comparison to miR-NC with LPS.
Figure 5. Effects of miR-451a and miR-16-5p synthetic mimics on Raw 264.7 macrophages. (A,B) Intracellular levels of miR-451a and miR-16-5p after transfecting cells with miRNA mimics. (C–F) RNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 in the presence of miR-451a and miR-16-5p mimics in cells exposed to LPS. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. Statistics by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01; ###, p < 0.001 in comparison to miR negative control (NC) without LPS unless otherwise indicated. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001 in comparison to miR-NC with LPS.
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g005
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of a miR-451a steric blocking oligonucleotide inhibitor on protein levels of IL-10 and TNF-α in RAW 264.7 macrophages exposed to LPS (500 ng/mL). Effects of co-exposure to the miR-451a inhibitor and a miR-451a synthetic mimic on IL-10 (A) and TNF-α (B) expression. Effects of co-exposure to the miR-451a inhibitor and donor-matched MSC EVs or adipose tissue BiNPs (109/mL) on IL-10 (C) and TNF-α (D) expression. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three replicates. Statistics by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. #, p < 0.05; ###, p < 0.001; ####, 0.0001 in comparison to control without LPS (A,B) or NC (C,D). *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001.
Figure 6. Effects of a miR-451a steric blocking oligonucleotide inhibitor on protein levels of IL-10 and TNF-α in RAW 264.7 macrophages exposed to LPS (500 ng/mL). Effects of co-exposure to the miR-451a inhibitor and a miR-451a synthetic mimic on IL-10 (A) and TNF-α (B) expression. Effects of co-exposure to the miR-451a inhibitor and donor-matched MSC EVs or adipose tissue BiNPs (109/mL) on IL-10 (C) and TNF-α (D) expression. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three replicates. Statistics by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc analysis. #, p < 0.05; ###, p < 0.001; ####, 0.0001 in comparison to control without LPS (A,B) or NC (C,D). *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceutics 14 00016 g006
Table
Table 1. Primers used in the study.
Table 1. Primers used in the study.
PrimersForward Sequences (5′→3′)Reverse Sequences (5′→3′)
IL-1βTACCTGTCCTGCGTGTTGAATCTTTGGGTAATTTTTGGGATCT
IL-6CCTCTGGTCTTCTGGAGTACCACTCCTTCTGTGACTCCAGC
IL-10GCTCTTGCACTACCAAAGCCCTGCTGATCCTCATGCCAGT
TNF-αAGCCCCCAGTCTGTATCCTTGAGGCAACCTGACCTCTCTC
S26TCATTCGGAACATTGTAGAAGCCAGCTTGACATAGAGCTTGGGAA
miR-451a RTGTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTGCACTGGATACGAC AACTCAG
miR-451aTGCGGAAACCGTTACCATTACTGCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT
miR-16-5p RTGTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTGCACTGGATACGACCGCCAAT
miR-16-5pTGCGGTAGCAGCACGTAAATATTCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT
U6 RTGTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACAAAATATGGAAC
U6TGCGGGTGCTCGCTTCGGCAGCCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT
Cel-miR-39 RTGTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTGCACTGGATACGACCAAGCTG
Cel-miR-39TGCGGTCACCGGGTGTAAATCAGCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT
Table
Table 2. Ten most abundant microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) in adipose tissue biogenic nanoparticles (BiNPs) and fold-changes compared to donor-matched adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) based on trimmed mean of the M-values (TMM) normalization of next-generation sequencing counts.
Table 2. Ten most abundant microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) in adipose tissue biogenic nanoparticles (BiNPs) and fold-changes compared to donor-matched adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) based on trimmed mean of the M-values (TMM) normalization of next-generation sequencing counts.
miRNAs (Listed According to Abundance)Suppression of Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR-4) Pathways
Fold-Change
(Compared to MSC EVs)		ReferencesGene Ontology (GO) Analysis
miR-16-5p11.6Yes (lung epithelial cells) [48]Yes
let-7a-5p1.2UnknownYes
miR-451a179.7Yes (microglial cells, lung tissue) [49,50]Unknown
miR-143-3p5.1Yes (lung tissue) [51]Unknown
let-7b-5p1.0Yes [52,53]Yes
let-7f-5p2.9UnknownYes
miR-125b-5p0.9Yes (myoblast cells) [54]Yes
miR-26a-5p2.8Yes (endothelial cells, microglial cells) [55,56]Yes
let-7i-5p0.9Yes (endothelial cells, kidney epithelial cells, kidney tissue) [57,58]Yes
miR-486-5p29.2UnknownUnknown
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Pham, A.; Kang, L.; Walker, S.A.; Davidovich, I.; Iannotta, D.; TerKonda, S.P.; Shapiro, S.; Talmon, Y.; Pham, S.; et al. Effects of Adipose-Derived Biogenic Nanoparticle-Associated microRNA-451a on Toll-like Receptor 4-Induced Cytokines. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010016

AMA Style

Wang X, Pham A, Kang L, Walker SA, Davidovich I, Iannotta D, TerKonda SP, Shapiro S, Talmon Y, Pham S, et al. Effects of Adipose-Derived Biogenic Nanoparticle-Associated microRNA-451a on Toll-like Receptor 4-Induced Cytokines. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xinghua, Anthony Pham, Lu Kang, Sierra A. Walker, Irina Davidovich, Dalila Iannotta, Sarvam P. TerKonda, Shane Shapiro, Yeshayahu Talmon, Si Pham, and et al. 2022. "Effects of Adipose-Derived Biogenic Nanoparticle-Associated microRNA-451a on Toll-like Receptor 4-Induced Cytokines" Pharmaceutics 14, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop