Next Article in Journal
Silk Fibroin/Spidroin Electrospun Scaffolds for Full-Thickness Skin Wound Healing in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Pharmaceutical Technology Methods for the Development of Innovative Porous Metasilicate Pellets with a Very High Specific Surface Area for Chemical Warfare Agents Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Essential Oils of Melaleuca, Citrus, Cupressus, and Litsea for the Management of Infections Caused by Candida Species: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Flow and Compression Properties of Four Lactose-Based Co-Processed Excipients: Cellactose® 80, CombiLac®, MicroceLac® 100, and StarLac®
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Critical Overview of FDA and EMA Statistical Methods to Compare In Vitro Drug Dissolution Profiles of Pharmaceutical Products

Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(10), 1703; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703
by Jan Muselík 1, Alena Komersová 2,*, Kateřina Kubová 1, Kevin Matzick 2 and Barbora Skalická 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(10), 1703; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101703
Submission received: 9 September 2021 / Revised: 12 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 October 2021 / Published: 15 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Advanced Pharmaceutical Research in the Czech Republic)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this work, the authors reviewed the strategies used for comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles of pharmaceutical formulations. They have shown the state of art and the troubles regarding some important situations where the conventional application of similarity factor f2 analysis is not possible, leading to ambiguous instructions. The subject review is very interesting; however, some points must be clarified/revised:

1) Title should be more specific considering analysis, modeling and comparisons.

2) Lines 33-35 - The authors should consider including more other references than FDA.

3) Lines 60-390 - Considering all this information, the authors should prepare and include in the manuscript (as a figure) a flowchart/diagram showing objectively the models/equations/analysis, problem and probable ways to go, like a protocol.

4) Lines 405-410 - The authors must improve this part of conclusion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors make a comparison of current strategies to compare dissolution profiles of pharmaceutical products. Although the discussion is clear, I do not find in the manuscript something different from what is already published in the literature, taking into account that this literature is also easily accessible.
The description of the different strategies used to compare the solubility profiles is not enough. There should be a section where the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed more strictly, present some examples where they were used, present the implications of using a specific method. Mention the risks of not making an adequate comparison.
In addition, it is important to include the method section and adequately describe how the information gathering process was designed to develop this manuscript.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

CURRENT STRATEGY IN COMPARISON OF IN VITRO DIS SOLUTION PROFILE DATA OF PHARMACEUTICAL PROD UCTS

The paper is a simple presentation of recommended and  considered within EMA and FDA statistical methods of dissolution comparison. According to the abstract an overview of suitable statistical methods, their procedures and limitations are considered, without giving their names in the abstract. Also in the abstract is not mentioned any suggestion for  the proposed better comparison method. Therefore, minor revision is suggested.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors made the suggested corrections. I recommend the publication of the manuscript.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

title of the manuscript was modified based on your suggestion.

 

Best regards

 

A. Komersová

 

Back to TopTop