Next Article in Journal
Viral Nucleases from Herpesviruses and Coronavirus in Recombination and Proofreading: Potential Targets for Antiviral Drug Discovery
Next Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Cell-Free Translation and Replication of Tobacco Mosaic Virus RNA by Exogenously Added 5′-Proximal Fragments of the Genomic RNA
Previous Article in Journal
A Testing Campaign Intervention Consisting of Peer-Facilitated Engagement, Point-of-Care HCV RNA Testing, and Linkage to Nursing Support to Enhance Hepatitis C Treatment Uptake among People Who Inject Drugs: The ETHOS Engage Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Specific Recognition of the 5′-Untranslated Region of West Nile Virus Genome by Human Innate Immune System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phosphomimetic S207D Lysyl–tRNA Synthetase Binds HIV-1 5′UTR in an Open Conformation and Increases RNA Dynamics

1
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
Center for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3
Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
4
Ohio State Biochemistry Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Current Address: Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
§
Current Address: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Current Address: Ice Miller LLP, Columbus, OH 43215, USA.
Viruses 2022, 14(7), 1556; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14071556
Submission received: 1 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 16 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulatory Mechanisms of Viral UTRs)

Abstract

:
Interactions between lysyl–tRNA synthetase (LysRS) and HIV-1 Gag facilitate selective packaging of the HIV-1 reverse transcription primer, tRNALys3. During HIV-1 infection, LysRS is phosphorylated at S207, released from a multi-aminoacyl–tRNA synthetase complex and packaged into progeny virions. LysRS is critical for proper targeting of tRNALys3 to the primer-binding site (PBS) by specifically binding a PBS-adjacent tRNA-like element (TLE), which promotes release of the tRNA proximal to the PBS. However, whether LysRS phosphorylation plays a role in this process remains unknown. Here, we used a combination of binding assays, RNA chemical probing, and small-angle X-ray scattering to show that both wild-type (WT) and a phosphomimetic S207D LysRS mutant bind similarly to the HIV-1 genomic RNA (gRNA) 5′UTR via direct interactions with the TLE and stem loop 1 (SL1) and have a modest preference for binding dimeric gRNA. Unlike WT, S207D LysRS bound in an open conformation and increased the dynamics of both the PBS region and SL1. A new working model is proposed wherein a dimeric phosphorylated LysRS/tRNA complex binds to a gRNA dimer to facilitate tRNA primer release and placement onto the PBS. Future anti-viral strategies that prevent this host factor-gRNA interaction are envisioned.

1. Introduction

The fundamental property that distinguishes retroviruses from other RNA viruses is the use of a specific host tRNA as a primer to reverse transcribe their genomic RNA (gRNA) into double-stranded proviral DNA. In HIV-1, human tRNALys3 serves as the primer and is selectively packaged into virions along with the other major tRNALys isoacceptors, tRNALys1,2 [1,2]. Canonically, mammalian tRNAs are virtually always protein-bound [3] and are generally present in the aminoacylated state inside cells [4]. Lysyl–tRNA synthetase (LysRS), the only cellular factor known to interact specifically with all tRNALys isoacceptors, is selectively packaged into HIV-1 [5]. LysRS and tRNALys are packaged in equimolar proportions, and siRNA knockdown of LysRS resulted in similarly reduced levels (~70%) of tRNALys packaging and viral infectivity [6]. Moreover, the packaging of tRNALys requires interaction with LysRS [5,7], but not tRNA aminoacylation [8], which would inhibit reverse transcription initiation through occlusion of the required free 3′ hydroxyl. These data support the critical role of LysRS in tRNALys packaging; however, the exact mechanism of selecting non-aminoacylated tRNALys3 remains unclear.
Reports on the primary source of LysRS packaged into HIV-1 have been diverse, leaving this an unsettled question. As a result of alternative splicing, two isoforms of LysRS that differ by only ~20 residues at the N-terminus, cytoplasmic and mitochondrial, are expressed in human cells [9], and both have been reported present in HIV-1 virions [8,10]. In the cytoplasm, two LysRS homodimers are bound to a multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex (MSC) through interactions between the dimer interface and the N-terminal region of a scaffolding protein known as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-interacting protein 2 (AIMP2) [11,12]. Another report suggested that packaged LysRS does not originate from the MSC, nucleus, mitochondria, or the cell membrane; instead, newly-synthesized cytoplasmic LysRS was proposed to interact with HIV-1 Gag before entering any of these compartments [13]. MSC release of LysRS is known to be driven by serine 207 phosphorylation (pS207), which causes a structural change in LysRS to a more open conformation that disrupts the AIMP2 binding site [11,12,14]. We recently reported that HIV-1 infection causes cytoplasmic, MSC-bound LysRS to be phosphorylated on S207, resulting in its release from the MSC and partial re-localization to the nucleus [15]. Treatment with a MEK inhibitor that prevents S207 phosphorylation and nuclear localization reduced viral infectivity by three- to seven-fold [15]. Furthermore, a phosphomimetic variant of LysRS (S207D) also localized to the nucleus and was packaged into HIV-1 virions [15]. In vitro experiments showed that despite retaining wild-type (WT) levels of tRNALys3 binding, S207D LysRS lacked aminoacylation activity [11,15]. Therefore, selection of the pS207 isoform of LysRS for tRNALys packaging may be an adaptation by HIV-1 to ensure that the primer has a free 3′ hydroxyl to initiate proviral DNA synthesis.
The large size (~9.1 kb) and structural complexity [16] of the HIV-1 gRNA has raised questions regarding the mechanism by which tRNALys3 is released from LysRS and specifically targeted to the primer-binding site (PBS) in the 5′UTR. Just upstream of the PBS lies a tRNA-like element (TLE), which mimics the U-rich anticodon loop sequence of tRNALys3; this TLE binds preferentially to LysRS [17], promoting the release of tRNALys3 directly adjacent to the PBS. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy experiments highlighted the strikingly similar interaction of the anticodon binding domain of LysRS with either the TLE or the anticodon stem-loop of tRNALys3 [18]. SAXS analysis revealed that the global structure of the 105-nt PBS/TLE (PBS/TLE105) domain mimics that of the canonical L-shape of tRNALys3 [19]. The affinity of LysRS for the gRNA is increased in constructs that contain the packaging signal stem-loops SL1 and SL2, compared to only the 105-nt PBS/TLE domain [17], suggesting additional interaction sites outside of the TLE.
Early mechanistic models of LysRS packaging were based on unmodified cytoplasmic LysRS [5,13,17,19,20]. More recently, LysRS phosphorylation has been shown to be important for tRNA-synthetase release from the MSC and tRNA primer packaging [15,21]. Since S207D-LysRS retains the ability to be packaged into HIV-1 virions [15], the phosphomimetic mutation is a good proxy for phosphorylation. In this work, we addressed the open question of how S207 modification affects interaction with the gRNA. We carried out a comprehensive in vitro comparison of WT and S207D-LysRS interactions with the HIV-1 gRNA using an integrated biophysical approach. These results are consistent with a model wherein S207D-LysRS preferentially binds to the PBS of dimeric gRNA in an open conformation that is distinct from that of a non-phosphorylated protein. Additionally, we show that S207D is uniquely capable of destabilizing the PBS region and SL1, a feature that may facilitate correct tRNA primer placement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Recombinant LysRS Variants

Plasmid pCDNA3ΔN65.LysRS [22] was mutated using site-directed ligase-independent mutagenesis [23] to make pCDNA3.207DLysRS [15]. These plasmids, which encode His-tagged human WT LysRS(ΔN65) and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) were transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3) CP-RIL, and proteins were prepared as follows. Starter cultures were grown overnight in 50 mL of LB media containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin at 37 °C. A 10 mL aliquot of this culture was added to 1 L of LB media containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin and grown for 90 min at 37 °C. After cooling cells to room temperature for 15 min, protein expression was induced using 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and incubated in a room temperature shaker overnight (~16 h). Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000× g for 15 min at 4 °C followed by resuspension of the cell pellet in 20 mL of lysis buffer (50 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, and 1 protease inhibitor tablet (Roche) per liter). The cells were lysed by sonication for 12 cycles of 15 s of sonication followed by 45 s of rest. Polyethylenimine (0.5% w/v final concentration) was added, and the solution was stirred gently for 30 min at 4 °C and cleared of cellular debris by centrifugation at 27,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Unwanted protein was precipitated by the addition of 375 mg/mL ammonium sulfate, incubated at room temperature for 15 min, and pelleted by centrifugation at 27,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with 50 mL of lysis buffer supplemented with 375 mg/mL ammonium sulfate and re-centrifuged at 27,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 20 mL of lysis buffer and further centrifuged at 27,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove insoluble debris. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-NTA (Sigma) column and washed with lysis buffer containing 20 mM imidazole. LysRS constructs were eluted using increasing amounts of imidazole and fractions containing hLysRSΔN65 were combined and concentrated using 30 K molecular weight cut-off centrifugal filter units (Amicon) by centrifuging at 3200× g at 4 °C. The concentrated protein was then dialyzed overnight in a 10 K molecular weight cut-off Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette (Thermo Scientific) into 2× storage buffer (80 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 4 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 protease inhibitor tablet (Roche) per liter). After dialysis, the protein solution was further concentrated using 30 K molecular weight cut-off centrifugal filter units (Amicon) by centrifuging at 3200× g at 4 °C. The concentrated protein solution was diluted with 1 volume of 80% glycerol (40% final) and the concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) and stored at −20 °C. The concentration determined by the Bradford assay was multiplied by a correction factor of 1.35 (determined previously by total amino acid analysis) to yield the true concentration. Since hLysRS∆N65 tends to aggregate after extended periods of storage (>6 months), freshly prepared protein was used for all experiments.

2.2. Preparation and Purification of RNAs and DNA-Primer-Annealed RNA Complexes

All DNA oligonucleotides used in this study (antiPBS18, antiPBS18+3, antiPBS18+6, and antiPBS18+11) were purchased from IDT (Coralville, IA, USA) and used without further purification. All RNAs—tRNALys3, PBS/TLE, UTR240, UTR240(ΔDIS), and UTR240(ΔDIS, ΔPBS)—were prepared by in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase and purified using denaturing (8 M urea) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Human tRNALys3 was prepared from a plasmid purchased from IDT (pIDTSmart-htRNALys3) containing the tRNALys3 sequence flanked by a T7 promoter on the 5′ side and a FokI restriction site on the 3′ side. PBS/TLE, corresponding to nucleotides (nt) 126 to 224 of the HIV-1 gRNA with an additional three 5′ G and three 3′ C nucleotides to enable efficient transcription, was transcribed from a FokI-digested plasmid as described [17,19]. UTR240 and UTR240(ΔDIS), corresponding to nt 106–345 of HIV-1 gRNA, were PCR amplified from plasmids containing the WT sequence or a dimerization-defective mutant, where the dimerization initiation site (DIS) palindrome (5′ AAGCGCGCA 3′) was replaced by a GAGA tetraloop (ΔDIS). The plasmids contained two additional mutations corresponding to U106G and U108C, and the reverse primer contained two mutations corresponding to U342C and G345C. The mutations allowed for efficient transcription by encoding two 5′ guanosines and helped to stabilize the UTR240 stem. The PCR products were used as templates for in vitro transcription. To determine an optimal RNA:DNA primer ratio for preparing DNA primer-annealed PBS/TLE, the RNA/DNA complex was heated to 80 °C for 2 min, 60 °C for 4 min, followed by the addition of MgCl2 to 1 mM, incubating at 37 °C for 6 min, and cooling on ice for at least 30 min. Complexes were analyzed by native PAGE (Figure S1) and the optimal ratio was determined to be 1:1.5 for PBS/TLE:DNA primer.

2.3. Fluorescence Anisotropy (FA) Binding Assays

RNAs used for FA assays were 3′-end labeled with fluorescein-5-semithiocarbazide (FTSC) (Invitrogen) as described [24,25]. Briefly, the RNA (2.5 nmoles) was oxidized using 75 nmoles of NaIO4 and then incubated with 2.5 mM FTSC overnight at 4 °C. The free FTSC dye was removed using G-25 Sephadex columns (Roche). The labeling efficiencies were calculated as described [25] and were typically between 75 and 90%.
FTSC-labeled UTR240 RNAs were folded in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 by heating at 80 °C for 2 min, 60 °C for 2 min followed by the addition of 10 mM MgCl2, and 37 °C for 15 min, then incubating them on ice for at least 30 min. PBS/TLE and DNA-primer-annealed PBS/TLE complexes were prepared with FTSC-labeled PBS/TLE alone or in the presence of a 1.5 molar excess of DNA primer in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 and refolding them using the heating strategy described above with the 37 °C incubation step shorted to 6 min. FA binding assays were performed as previously described [17] with minor modifications. Refolded fluorescently labeled RNAs (20 nM) were mixed with varying concentrations of WT or S207D LysRS(ΔN65) by serial dilution from 10 µM to 16 nM in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 15 mM NaCl, 35 mM KCl and 1 mM MgCl2. Anisotropy was measured by excitation at 485 nm with the emission read at 525 nm. The data points were fit assuming 1:1 binding [26]. All FA binding data are reported as the average and standard deviation of three independent experiments.

2.4. UV Crosslinking with SHAPE (XL-SHAPE) Experiments

Purified in vitro transcribed WT UTR240 RNAs in complex with WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) were probed by selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) using N-methylisotoic anhydride (NMIA) (Sigma-Aldrich) as described, with minor variations [16,27]. Briefly, RNAs (5 µM) were folded in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 and 1 mM MgCl2, as described above, and then diluted to 0.5 µM in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 60 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl and 1 mM MgCl2, as well as different concentrations of the corresponding LysRS variant (2.5, 7.5, 15 and 25 µM). Each reaction (10 µL) was incubated at room temperature for 30 min to allow the binding to reach equilibrium. Reactions were initiated with 1 μL NMIA (80 mM stock in DMSO) or neat DMSO for the (+) and (−) reactions, respectively, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min followed by phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. For RNA-only controls, protein storage buffer was added instead of protein. The following six reactions were included in each experiment: a control reaction of RNA with DMSO, RNA with NMIA, and RNA with NMIA in the presence of the four noted concentrations of LysRS.
For crosslinking analyses, RNA:LysRS complexes were prepared as described for SHAPE. Samples (10 µL) were crosslinked on ice in a Stratalinker 2400 UV crosslinker (Stratagene) using a total energy of 200 mJ/cm2. Non-crosslinked control samples were incubated on ice for the same amount of time. The following six reactions were included in each experiment: a no protein/no UV background, RNA only with crosslinking, and RNA incubated with the four different concentrations of LysRS noted above. Following the crosslinking reactions, protein was denatured with 1 µL of 5% SDS (0.5% final) followed by the addition of 1 µL of Proteinase K (800 U/mL, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and incubation at 55 °C for 60 min. RNA was recovered by phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation.
RNA samples from both SHAPE and crosslinking experiments were resuspended in 9 µL RNase-free water followed by the addition of dNTP mix (1 µL of 10 mM each) and 2 µL of 5 µM 5′-NEDTM labeled primer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and incubation at 85 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 5 min, 35 °C for 5 min and 50 °C for 10 min. Reverse transcription mix (8 µL) containing 1 µL of SuperScript III (200 U/µL), 4 µL 5× first-strand buffer, 2 µL 0.1 M DTT and 1 µL MiliQ H2O was then added. Samples were incubated at 55 °C for 1 h and inactivated at 70 °C for 15 min following the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). RNA was hydrolyzed with 1 µL of 4 M NaOH and incubated at 95 °C for 3 min. Samples were cooled on ice and neutralized with 2 µL of 2 M HCl. A description of the primers used for these experiments can be found in Table S1.
Dideoxy sequencing reactions were conducted on the same DNA template used for the in vitro transcription of the UTR240 constructs, using the Thermo Sequenase Cycle Sequencing Kit (Affymetrix) and the same NEDTM-labeled primers as those used for primer extension (Table S1). Sequencing reactions containing 200 ng DNA template and 1 pmol NEDTM-labeled primer were heated to 95 °C for 1 min followed by 60 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min in a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). Sequencing reactions were performed independently with each NEDTM-labeled primer. Primer extension products from the SHAPE experiments, crosslinking experiments and sequencing reactions were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis on an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer (Genomics Shared Resources Facility, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA) after resuspension of the cDNA pellets in formamide and mixing with GeneScan™ 600 LIZ® Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) for inter-capillary alignment as described [28].
Raw electropherograms were converted to normalized SHAPE reactivity using the ribonucleic acid capillary–electrophoresis analysis tool (RiboCAT) [28]. Peak areas for each of the six reactions were calculated and then scaled to the RNA-only background reaction. At least three independent experiments were performed and the data from each independent trial were analyzed individually to generate average SHAPE reactivities. The differences between the SHAPE reactivity of the free RNA and that of the reaction in the presence of the highest protein concentration were analyzed by an unpaired two-tail Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was attributed to peaks characterized by an absolute difference in SHAPE reactivity of ≥ 0.3 arbitrary units and a p-value < 0.05 between the RNA-only control and the highest protein concentration sample [29]. In addition, only those peaks for which a dose-dependence could be observed were deemed significant.

2.5. Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Analysis

The UTR240(ΔDIS) and UTR240(ΔDIS, ΔPBS) constructs (400 µg) were refolded in a volume of 200 µL by heating in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, to 80 °C for 2 min, 60 °C for 2 min, followed by addition of 10 mM MgCl2. The samples were then incubated at 37 °C for 15 min, and on ice for at least 30 min. The folded RNAs were purified by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) on a 24-mL Superdex 200 10/300 GL Increase column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) using a GE ÄKTA purifier in a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl2, and 3% glycerol (wt/vol) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The absorbance of the eluate was monitored at 260 nm. Fractions corresponding to the peak of interest were concentrated to ~40 µL and serially diluted to yield three different concentrations for the analysis of each sample. Prior to shipment to the SIBYLS beamline at Lawrence Berkeley National Labs for data collection [30], an aliquot of the highest concentration sample was retained for native PAGE analysis to be performed at the same time the SAXS data were to be collected [31]. There were no signs of degradation or heterogeneity by native PAGE.
SAXS data analysis steps were carried out as previously described [19,31] using the program PRIMUS [32]. Guinier analysis was used to calculate the Rg of the RNA, and Kratky analysis was performed to determine the extent of folding [31]. If the Guinier plot displayed non-linearity (a sign of poor-quality data) or Kratky analysis indicated that the RNA was not well-folded, then the data were not analyzed further. The P(r) function was calculated using the program GNOM [32], and the Dmax and P(r)-based Rg was determined using the AUTOGNOM feature. Ab initio envelopes were generated largely as previously described using the ATSAS software suite [19,31,32]. Briefly, 50 ab initio envelopes were generated in jagged mode with no symmetry restraints imposed, and the χ2 fits and reproducibility (NSD) values were determined. These 50 envelopes were averaged into one envelope, which was then packed with additional “dummy atoms” with an atomic radius of 2.0 Å. This was then used as the starting point for an additional 50 ab initio envelope calculations, generated in expert mode with no symmetry restraints imposed. These envelopes were averaged and filtered to generate the final envelope, and their χ2 fits and NSD values were calculated.

2.6. SEC–SAXS Analysis of Primer-Annealed and LysRS Bound PBS/TLE Complexes

Size-exclusion chromatography coupled with SAXS (SEC–SAXS) was used to analyze complexes to alleviate problems with sample heterogeneity. Each of the DNA primer-annealed PBS/TLE RNA complexes (PBS/TLE annealed to each of the antiPBS18, antiPBS18+3, antiPBS18+6, and antiPBS18+11 DNA primers) were prepared using 1 mg total nucleic acid with a 1.5 molar excess of DNA primer and refolded in a volume of 200 µL by heating the sample in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, to 80 °C for 2 min, 60 °C for 4 min, followed by the addition of 10 mM MgCl2. The sample was then incubated at 37 °C for 6 min and on ice for at least 30 min. For LysRS-bound PBS/TLE complexes, PBS/TLE was first refolded as described for the primer-annealed PBS/TLE complexes and purified by SEC on a 24-mL Superdex 200 10/300 GL Increase column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) using a GE ÄKTA purifier in a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl2, and 3% glycerol (wt/vol) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The absorbance of the eluate was monitored at 260 nm. Fractions corresponding to the peak of interest were concentrated to ~40 µL. Purified PBS/TLE was then incubated with a 1:1 molar ratio of either WT or S207D LysRS for 30 min prior to SEC-SAXS analysis.
SEC–SAXS data were collected at station G1 at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) using the experimental set-up described [33]. Briefly, refolded samples were loaded into a GE ÄKTA Pure M with a 24-mL Superdex 200 10/300 GL Increase column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and SEC was run in 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl2, and 3% glycerol (wt/vol) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The absorbance of the eluate was monitored at 260 nm. The ÄKTA Pure M is coupled to the beamline such that the sample goes directly from the absorbance detector into a flow-cell in the beamline. The X-ray source was a 1.5 m CHESS Compact Undulator, and X-rays were detected using a Finger Lakes charged–coupled device (CCD). The beam diameter was 250 × 250 µm with a flux of 8.4 × 1011 photons s−1 and an energy of 9.962 keV. X-ray exposures were taken continuously every 4 s while the SEC eluent passed through the SAXS flow cell. Initial SAXS data processing, including radial averaging and buffer subtraction, was performed using the BioXTAS RAW software program [34]. SAXS exposures (10 × 4 s) corresponding to the RNA peak of interest on the SEC were averaged, and 50 × 4 s SAXS exposures corresponding to the buffer alone were averaged and then used to buffer subtract the RNA average SAXS curve [35]. Average SAXS curves were analyzed as described above. The envelope for PBS/TLE alone was recalculated as described above for SAXS analysis using data from a previously published study [19].

3. Results

3.1. The DIS Contributes to gRNA Binding of Both WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65)

A LysRS(ΔN65) variant with the N-terminal 65 residues deleted is more sensitive to specific RNA binding interactions [36], and a truncated form of LysRS in virions likely contains this deletion [5]. Therefore, all experiments described for both the WT and the phosphomimetic S207D mutant were performed in the context of LysRS(ΔN65) (Figure 1A). Previous work investigating LysRS–gRNA binding were performed using WT LysRS(ΔN65). This protein specifically binds to the TLE motif [17,18,19], but higher-affinity binding of LysRS(ΔN65) to gRNA additionally required regions of the Psi RNA-packaging domain [17,37]. Therefore, to determine whether S207D LysRS(ΔN65) retains the same binding characteristics, FA binding assays were performed using 3′ fluorescently labeled RNAs corresponding to in vitro transcribed human tRNALys3, the 105-nt PBS/TLE105 domain alone or constructs (UTR240 and UTR240(ΔDIS)) containing both the PBS/TLE and Psi domains. The first nine nucleotides of the gag coding region were included because they contribute to the structure and stability of the packaging signal [38], but the first 104-nt (TAR and polyA hairpins) were excluded because they do not appreciably contribute to LysRS binding [17]. Native PAGE analysis of the WT UTR240 RNA showed complete dimerization under the conditions used for FA assays (Figure S2). The ΔDIS variant contains a mutated DIS that eliminates gRNA dimerization (Figure 1B). To promote transcription efficiency and stabilize the terminal stems, the first U–G base pair was changed to a G–C pair and the two following U–G/G–U wobble pairs were mutated to C–G/G–C pairs, respectively (Figure 1A). Both WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) bound tRNALys3 and PBS/TLE105 with similar affinity but bound the Psi-containing WT UTR240 with approximately two-fold higher affinity (Table 1, Figure S3). This closely matches our previous findings for WT LysRS(ΔN65) [17]. Mutation of the DIS palindrome to a GNRA tetraloop (Figure 1B) reduced affinity back to the level of tRNALys3 and PBS/TLE105 for both LysRS(ΔN65) variants. Therefore, the higher binding affinity is either due to specific interactions with the DIS sequence or gRNA dimerization/conformational differences.

3.2. S207D LysRS(ΔN65) Binds the PBS/TLE in an Open Conformation

Results of the binding assays suggest that WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) have similar RNA binding affinities, displaying somewhat higher affinity binding to the dimeric gRNA. SAXS was next used to investigate the structures formed upon WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) binding to the PBS/TLE RNA. SAXS yields ab initio molecular envelopes that reflect the global fold of the molecule or complex with a calculated maximum dimension (DMAX). Signs of aggregation, radiation damage or heterogeneity were absent from the obtained SAXS data (Figure S4). When compared to PBS/TLE alone (DMAX = 123 Å), the binding of WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) resulted in more extended envelopes with DMAX of 139 and 162 Å, respectively (Figure 2). The additional envelope density for both complexes corresponds to the region previously mapped to the TLE stem and loop [19]. A previous SAXS analysis of LysRS(ΔN65) reported that both WT and S207D variants form stable homodimers, with S207D adopting a more open conformation resulting from a 37-degree rotation of the N-terminal domains of each monomer with respect to their respective catalytic domains [11].

3.3. S207D LysRS(ΔN65) Binding Induces gRNA Conformational Flexibility

To characterize both WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) binding sites and RNA conformational changes upon protein binding, XL-SHAPE studies were carried out using the WT UTR240 with the capability to dimerize. SHAPE is a single-nt resolution RNA structure probing technique where anhydride SHAPE reagents react with the 2′-hydroxyl of all four nts to form covalent adducts that stop primer extension by reverse transcriptase [39,40]. SHAPE reagents are more reactive to less constrained, unpaired nts [39,41]. SHAPE probing of protein–RNA complexes can be used to identify RNA conformational changes associated with protein binding but cannot reliably identify direct binding sites [42]. To identify binding sites, UV-crosslinking of the protein:RNA complex was carried out. Protease digestion following UV irradiation leaves a covalent adduct on the RNA that can similarly be characterized by primer extension stops. For both SHAPE and XL experiments, a protein titration was performed with stringent criteria for positives indicated by a dose-dependent reactivity change of >0.3 from the “no protein” control to the highest protein concentration (Figure S5).
The baseline SHAPE reactivity pattern of the UTR240 (Figure 3) closely matches results that we and others have previously reported [16,27,28]. In agreement with binding data (Table 1), clusters of XL sites were identified in the TLE and SL1 hairpins for both WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65), with very similar XL footprints (Figure 3, asterisks). Three XL sites were also identified in the unstructured PBS loop upon titration of S207D LysRS(ΔN65), but not WT. The more flexible “open conformation” of the S207D LysRS(ΔN65) [11] may have facilitated the interaction with the PBS loop when compared to the more compact WT protein. Consistent with the binding assays showing higher affinity binding to an RNA construct that also contains SL1, both LysRS(ΔN65) constructs directly bind the SL1 stem of the UTR240. Although a higher affinity binding requires the DIS sequence (Table 1), no crosslinks were identified in the palindromic DIS. Only the S207D variant showed XL sites in and proximal to the DIS loop, which could be due to this protein binding in the more open conformation.
Despite their similar binding affinity and XL footprints, a larger number of SHAPE reactivity changes resulted from S207D LysRS(ΔN65) binding when compared to WT LysRS(ΔN65) (25 and 3, respectively). Indeed, 22 of the 25 differences upon titration of S207D LysRS(ΔN65) are increases in SHAPE reactivity, located predominantly in the PBS loop and SL1 stem (Figure 3, red arrows), indicating an increase in the conformational flexibility of these regions. The binding of both proteins resulted in reduced flexibility (Figure 3, blue arrows) at the 3′ side of the TLE loop, likely because of protein binding.

3.4. The Monomeric UTR240(ΔDIS) Adopts an Extended Cruciform-like Conformation

The binding assays and XL data suggest that both LysRS(ΔN65) constructs directly bind the TLE and SL1 stems of the UTR240 and do not interact directly with the DIS sequence. SAXS was next used to determine the overall tertiary fold of the UTR240(ΔDIS) gRNA construct. The SAXS data showed no signs of aggregation, radiation damage or heterogeneity (Figure S6). The resulting SAXS-derived ab initio molecular envelope revealed a cruciform-like shape (Figure 4A). Furthermore, one appendage has a distinct L-shaped structure expected of the PBS/TLE domain [19]. To map the region of the envelope corresponding to the PBS/TLE, we also performed SAXS analysis of a truncated 145-nt UTR240(ΔDIS, ΔPBS/TLE) RNA with a GAGA tetraloop inserted in place of the PBS/TLE domain. PBS/TLE truncation resulted in a structural model wherein the L-shaped region is missing from the ab initio envelope (Figure 4B, blue spheres). A structure corresponding to the UTR240(ΔDIS) with the PBS/TLE domain replaced with a tetraloop, termed the “core encapsidation signal”, was previously determined by NMR [38]. To assign the remaining domains, we overlayed the SL1, SL3 and U5:AUG stem loops from the reported NMR structure into our SAXS-derived model using the size and shape of each stem loop as a guide (Figure 4C). We found excellent agreement with one cruciform arm and SL1 domain from the NMR structure (Figure 4C, orange), and were also able to fit the remaining helices from the NMR structure into our envelope (Figure 4C, red, yellow, purple).
Based on our SAXS data, we conclude that the TLE and SL1 are oriented in opposite directions in the monomeric UTR240(ΔDIS). This orientation is too distant for a single WT or S207D LysRS(ΔN65) homodimer (Figure 4D) to bind both sites without a significant conformational change. Importantly, the SAXS envelope indicates a structure in which SL1 is properly folded, with the DIS exposed in the expected dimer-competent conformation. Therefore, the reduced binding of LysRS(ΔN65) to the UTR240(ΔDIS) relative to the WT UTR240 is not due to misfolding of the RNA. Rather, tighter binding of both LysRS(ΔN65) variants to the UTR240 requires gRNA dimerization.

3.5. Disruption of TLE Structure by Primer Extension Releases Bound LysRS

Previous work demonstrated that the TLE hairpin is the primary determinant for LysRS(ΔN65) binding to gRNA via anticodon loop sequence mimicry and structure mimicry of the canonical tRNA L-shaped fold [18,19,37]. In our proposed model, LysRS facilitates correct primer localization by releasing tRNALys3 in close proximity to the PBS due to competition by the TLE for LysRS binding [17,19]. Therefore, because LysRS binding to the TLE precedes primer annealing, we hypothesized that the initiation of reverse transcription will induce conformational changes in the TLE that facilitates the release of LysRS, ensuring that LysRS binding does not significantly inhibit proviral DNA synthesis.
To test this hypothesis and characterize the conformational changes that occur during reverse transcription initiation, binding assays were performed between WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65) variants and PBS/TLE constructs annealed to short DNA oligonucleotides resembling different stages of initial reverse transcription products (Figure 5A). The annealing of antiPBS18 and antiPBS18+3 should not significantly alter the TLE structure, but annealing of antiPBS18+6 and antiPBS18+11, with complementary regions that extend into the TLE stem, would be expected to cause gradual unfolding of the TLE hairpin. Reverse transcription pauses were observed at +3 and +5 sites upon primer extension, due to the stability of the TLE stem [43]. As expected, binding of LysRS(ΔN65) was relatively unaffected by a 3-nt extended primer, but further extension progressively increased the dissociation constant for both WT and S207D LysRS(ΔN65), consistent with destabilization of the complex (Table 2, Figure S7). The +6 extended primer had reduced affinity despite not annealing to any nt that directly crosslink to either LysRS(ΔN65) variant (Figure 3). Similarly, the +11 primer only annealed to 2 or 1 nt that crosslinked to WT or S207D LysRS(ΔN65), respectively.
We previously proposed [17,18,19] that the overall conformation of the TLE region is likely to play a role in specific LysRS(ΔN65) recognition. SAXS was next used to characterize the structural consequences of extended-primer annealing to the PBS/TLE domain. For these experiments, SEC–SAXS was used, wherein primer-annealed PBS/TLE complexes were separated by SEC immediately prior to SAXS analysis [31,33,34,44]. The primer was present in a 1.5× molar excess to ensure that close to 100% of the PBS/TLE was in the annealed state. All data collected for the PBS/TLE and primer annealed complexes lacked any signs of heterogeneity, aggregation or interparticle interactions/repulsions (Figure S8) [31]. The conformation of the PBS/TLE RNA with antiPBS18 annealed (Figure 5B) closely resembled our previously reported structure [19]. SAXS envelopes for antiPBS18+3, antiPBS18+6 and antiPBS18+11 annealed complexes show that the TLE has a progressive counter-clockwise rotation of ~65°, ~145° and ~225°, respectively, with respect to the planar PBS region (Figure 5C, Figure S9 and Table 2).

4. Discussion

Retroviruses have limited sequence space to encode all biological requirements for efficient replication. To maximize functionality, host factors are co-opted to facilitate replication. HIV-1 must package a non-aminoacylated tRNALys3 primer to initiate reverse transcription and has evolved to selectively package a complex of phosphorylated LysRS, which lacks aminoacylation capability, and its cognate tRNA [15]. Previously, we proposed that competition from the gRNA 5′UTR for LysRS binding facilitates tRNALys3 release from LysRS, which interacts with a TLE stem loop directly adjacent to the PBS [17,18,19,37]. S207D LysRS(ΔN65) is known to exist primarily as a homodimer with a conformation that is more “open” when compared to WT LysRS [11]. It was unclear whether this structural switch has any effect on the 5′UTR binding properties or the mechanism of LysRS-facilitated primer placement. The similarities in binding constants and crosslinking sites reported here suggest that S207D LysRS(ΔN65) retains the characteristic binding properties of WT LysRS(ΔN65) (Table 1, Figure 3). Indeed, both LysRS variants have a two- to three-fold preference for binding to 5′UTR constructs that contain the Psi packaging signal with an intact DIS (Table 1). Importantly, based on crosslinking data, neither LysRS variant directly binds to the DIS. We therefore conclude that the competition for LysRS binding that results in tRNA release proximal to the PBS is more efficient on dimeric HIV-1 gRNAs, the isoform that is packaged into progeny virions [45]. This may help to ensure that phosphorylated LysRS is not diverted from the packaged gRNA dimers to the non-packaged monomeric HIV-1 viral RNAs that serve as mRNAs for viral protein synthesis.
SAXS analysis of LysRS bound to PBS/TLE105 revealed ~16 and ~39 Å longer envelopes for WT and S207D LysRS-bound complexes, respectively, relative to the RNA alone (Figure 2). Due to the low-resolution nature of SAXS and the lack of well-defined features in the extra density, it cannot be conclusively determined whether LysRS is binding as a monomer or its more preferred dimer. Attempts to ascertain the stoichiometry of these complexes using native mass spectrometry were unsuccessful due to the aggregation of the complexes in the buffer conditions required for analysis. Nevertheless, a previous study using hydrogen–deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and SAXS reported that both WT and S207D LysRS exist primarily as homodimers in solution [11]. Therefore, it is most likely that both WT and S207D bind to the HIV-1 gRNA as homodimers. Moreover, the larger excess density observed in the S207D LysRS: PBS/TLE105 complex is likely caused by the “open conformation” that was previously reported for S207D LysRS homodimers [11].
The other major difference observed between WT and S207D LysRS binding to HIV-1 gRNA was an increased flexibility in the PBS loop and SL1 stem upon binding of S207D LysRS, but not WT (Figure 3). While it remains unclear whether this has any effect on HIV-1 replication, we speculate that it may play a role in facilitating primer annealing or reverse transcription initiation. While not necessary in the NL4.3 isolate used in this study, ~14% of HIV-1 isolates including the well-studied MAL isolate require substantial conformational rearrangement of the PBS region for formation of the reverse transcription initiation complex [46]. While the authors of that study suggested that the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein facilitates this rearrangement, our results suggest that S207D LysRS may also participate in these conformational changes.
The fact that LysRS binds to both the PBS/TLE and SL1 suggests that these regions of the 5′UTR may be in close proximity in the three-dimensional structure. However, SAXS data revealed that the UTR240(ΔDIS) RNA construct adopts a cruciform-like structure with the PBS/TLE and SL1 on opposite ends of the structure (Figure 4). Based on the relative size of LysRS (Figure 4A,B are at the same scale), a single LysRS dimer is not large enough to bind both the PBS/TLE and SL1 without a conformational change in the RNA. Further, the individual stems (PBS/TLE, SL1/SL2, SL3 and U5:AUG) appear to be independently folded and correspond well to those domains from a recently published NMR structure of the core encapsidation signal, which contains the same RNA regions with a truncated PBS/TLE [38]. Although the individual stems fit nicely into the SAXS envelope, the relative orientations of the stems do not match the reported NMR structure. This may be due to conformational differences resulting from inclusion of the PBS/TLE domain, different experimental conditions, or lack of long-range NMR constraints and/or residual dipolar coupling data to obtain orientation data for the helices in the NMR study.
The first secondary structure element that reverse transcriptase encounters during minus-strand strong-stop cDNA synthesis is the TLE stem [47], which represents a potential roadblock if LysRS is tightly bound. Therefore, LysRS must unbind from the TLE during tRNA primer extension for efficient reverse transcription. Our FA data indicate that the affinity of LysRS for the TLE is reduced as a DNA primer is extended into the first 8 nt of the TLE stem (Table 2), likely due to disruption of the tRNA-like conformation of the PBS/TLE domain (Figure 5). This result supports our proposed mechanism of LysRS-dependent primer placement based on tRNA mimicry of the PBS/TLE [19]. This also suggests that the affinity of the PBS/TLE for LysRS is finely tuned to allow for proper primer placement, but not tight enough to provide a substantial barrier to reverse transcription.
Based on these results, a new working model is proposed (Figure 6). In this model, HIV-1 infection triggers phosphorylation of LysRS at S207, resulting in LysRS release from the MSC in a conformation that is competent for tRNA binding but not for aminoacylation [11,15] (Figure 6, Step 1). The catalytically inactive dimeric pS207–LysRS/tRNA complex is then recruited to sites of viral assembly via interactions with HIV-1 Gag [5,48]. The 5′UTR can adopt various monomeric and dimeric conformations, including a “kissing loop” dimer [49,50,51,52,53,54] (Figure 6, Step 2). The anticodon-like TLE of an HIV-1 gRNA dimer then competes for binding to pS207–LysRS resulting in an increase in dynamics of the gRNA in this region and release of the tRNA primer proximal to the PBS (Figure 6, Step 3). Crosslinking and dynamic changes are also observed in the SL1 hairpin, but whether a second LysRS dimer binds directly to this region as shown here remains to be confirmed. The tRNA primer is subsequently annealed to the PBS via chaperone activity of the nucleocapsid domain of the HIV-1 Gag polyprotein [55,56] (Figure 6, Step 4). After viral budding and maturation, reverse transcriptase specifically binds the tRNA:gRNA duplex (Figure 6, Step 5) and initiates the synthesis of minus-strand strong stop proviral DNA from the 3′ end of the uncharged tRNA primer (Figure 6, Step 6). During the initial extension of the primer (3–11 nt), the conformation of the TLE changes and its tRNA mimicry is lost, triggering release of pS207–LysRS from the gRNA. Based on this model, we propose that pS207–LysRS initially selects and facilitates tRNA annealing on the kissing loop dimer subpopulation of gRNA conformers. Annealing of the tRNA primer further stabilizes the kissing dimer and mature nucleocapsid protein subsequently promotes the formation of a more stable extended dimer conformation [49].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14071556/s1, Table S1: Table of RNA and DNA primer sequences used in this study; Figure S1: Native PAGE analysis of DNA-primer-annealed PBS/TLE complexes; Figure S2: Native PAGE analysis of UTR240 RNAs; Figure S3: Fluorescence anisotropy plots of WT and S207D LysRS(∆N65) binding to HIV-1 RNAs; Figure S4: SAXS processing of LysRS-bound PBS/TLE; Figure S5: Results of XL-SHAPE titration of LysRS constructs binding to UTR240 RNA; Figure S6: SAXS processing of UTR240(ΔDIS) and UTR240(ΔDIS,ΔPBS/TLE) constructs; Figure S7: Fluorescence anisotropy plots of WT and S207D LysRS(∆N65) binding to primer-annealed HIV-1 PBS/TLE105 RNAs; Figure S8: SAXS processing of DNA-primer annealed PBS/TLE; Figure S9: Superposed orthogonal views of all primer-annealed HIV-1 PBS/TLE105 RNA SAXS-derived ab initio envelopes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A.C., C.P., E.D.O. and K.M.-F.; Data curation, W.A.C. and C.P.; Formal analysis, W.A.C., C.P., J.H. and E.D.O.; Funding acquisition, W.A.C. and K.M.-F.; Methodology, W.A.C., C.P., J.H. and E.D.O.; Project administration, W.A.C. and K.M.-F.; Supervision, W.A.C. and K.M.-F.; Visualization, W.A.C. and C.P.; Writing—Original draft, W.A.C. and C.P.; Writing—Review & editing, W.A.C., C.P., J.H., E.D.O. and K.M.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grants RO1 AI150493 and U54 AI150472 (to K.M.-F.) for binding/XL-SHAPE studies and SAXS studies, respectively. W.A.C. was supported by a Pelotonia Postdoctoral Fellowship at Ohio State. Additional support comes from the National Institute of Health project ALS-ENABLE (P30 GM124169) and a High-End Instrumentation Grant S10OD018483. SEC-SAXS data was collected at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS), which is supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences under NSF award DMR-1829070 using the Macromolecular Diffraction at CHESS (MacCHESS) facility, which is supported by award GM-124166 from the National Institutes of Health, through its National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data collected for this study will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Kevin Garayalde Batista for help with initial SHAPE studies. SAXS data collection was conducted at the Advanced Light Source (ALS), a national user facility operated by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on behalf of the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, through the Integrated Diffraction Analysis Technologies (IDAT) program, supported by DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, M.; Mak, J.; Ladha, A.; Cohen, E.; Klein, M.; Rovinski, B.; Kleiman, L. Identification of tRNAs incorporated into wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 3246–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Pavon-Eternod, M.; Wei, M.; Pan, T.; Kleiman, L. Profiling non-lysyl tRNAs in HIV-1. RNA 2010, 16, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Stapulionis, R.; Deutscher, M.P. A channeled tRNA cycle during mammalian protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 7158–7161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Evans, M.E.; Clark, W.C.; Zheng, G.; Pan, T. Determination of tRNA aminoacylation levels by high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cen, S.; Khorchid, A.; Javanbakht, H.; Gabor, J.; Stello, T.; Shiba, K.; Musier-Forsyth, K.; Kleiman, L. Incorporation of lysyl-tRNA synthetase into human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 5043–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Guo, F.; Cen, S.; Niu, M.; Javanbakht, H.; Kleiman, L. Specific inhibition of the synthesis of human lysyl-tRNA synthetase results in decreases in tRNA(Lys) incorporation, tRNA(3)(Lys) annealing to viral RNA, and viral infectivity in human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 9817–9822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Javanbakht, H.; Cen, S.; Musier-Forsyth, K.; Kleiman, L. Correlation between tRNALys3 aminoacylation and its incorporation into HIV-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 17389–17396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cen, S.; Javanbakht, H.; Niu, M.; Kleiman, L. Ability of wild-type and mutant lysyl-tRNA synthetase to facilitate tRNA(Lys) incorporation into human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 1595–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tolkunova, E.; Park, H.; Xia, J.; King, M.P.; Davidson, E. The human lysyl-tRNA synthetase gene encodes both the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial enzymes by means of an unusual alternative splicing of the primary transcript. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35063–35069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kaminska, M.; Shalak, V.; Francin, M.; Mirande, M. Viral hijacking of mitochondrial lysyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ofir-Birin, Y.; Fang, P.; Bennett, S.P.; Zhang, H.M.; Wang, J.; Rachmin, I.; Shapiro, R.; Song, J.; Dagan, A.; Pozo, J.; et al. Structural switch of lysyl-tRNA synthetase between translation and transcription. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hei, Z.; Wu, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Fang, P. Retractile lysyl-tRNA synthetase-AIMP2 assembly in the human multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 4775–4783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Halwani, R.; Cen, S.; Javanbakht, H.; Saadatmand, J.; Kim, S.; Shiba, K.; Kleiman, L. Cellular distribution of Lysyl-tRNA synthetase and its interaction with Gag during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 assembly. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 7553–7564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fang, P.; Zhang, H.M.; Shapiro, R.; Marshall, A.G.; Schimmel, P.; Yang, X.L.; Guo, M. Structural context for mobilization of a human tRNA synthetase from its cytoplasmic complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 8239–8244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Duchon, A.A.; St Gelais, C.; Titkemeier, N.; Hatterschide, J.; Wu, L.; Musier-Forsyth, K. HIV-1 Exploits a Dynamic Multi-aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Complex To Enhance Viral Replication. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01240-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Watts, J.M.; Dang, K.K.; Gorelick, R.J.; Leonard, C.W.; Bess, J.W., Jr.; Swanstrom, R.; Burch, C.L.; Weeks, K.M. Architecture and secondary structure of an entire HIV-1 RNA genome. Nature 2009, 460, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jones, C.P.; Saadatmand, J.; Kleiman, L.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Molecular mimicry of human tRNALys anti-codon domain by HIV-1 RNA genome facilitates tRNA primer annealing. RNA 2013, 19, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, S.; Comandur, R.; Jones, C.P.; Tsang, P.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Anticodon-like binding of the HIV-1 tRNA-like element to human lysyl-tRNA synthetase. RNA 2016, 22, 1828–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, C.P.; Cantara, W.A.; Olson, E.D.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Small-angle X-ray scattering-derived structure of the HIV-1 5′ UTR reveals 3D tRNA mimicry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3395–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kleiman, L.; Cen, S. The tRNALys packaging complex in HIV-1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 1776–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jin, D.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Role of host tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in retroviral replication. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5352–5364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shiba, K.; Stello, T.; Motegi, H.; Noda, T.; Musier-Forsyth, K.; Schimmel, P. Human lysyl-tRNA synthetase accepts nucleotide 73 variants and rescues Escherichia coli double-defective mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 22809–22816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chiu, J.; Tillett, D.; Dawes, I.W.; March, P.E. Site-directed, Ligase-Independent Mutagenesis (SLIM) for highly efficient mutagenesis of plasmids greater than 8kb. J. Microbiol. Methods 2008, 73, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pagano, J.M.; Clingman, C.C.; Ryder, S.P. Quantitative approaches to monitor protein-nucleic acid interactions using fluorescent probes. RNA 2011, 17, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Rye-McCurdy, T.; Rouzina, I.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Fluorescence anisotropy-based salt-titration approach to characterize protein-nucleic acid interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1259, 385–402. [Google Scholar]
  26. Stewart-Maynard, K.M.; Cruceanu, M.; Wang, F.; Vo, M.N.; Gorelick, R.J.; Williams, M.C.; Rouzina, I.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Retroviral nucleocapsid proteins display nonequivalent levels of nucleic acid chaperone activity. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 10129–10142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wilkinson, K.A.; Gorelick, R.J.; Vasa, S.M.; Guex, N.; Rein, A.; Mathews, D.H.; Giddings, M.C.; Weeks, K.M. High-throughput SHAPE analysis reveals structures in HIV-1 genomic RNA strongly conserved across distinct biological states. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cantara, W.A.; Hatterschide, J.; Wu, W.; Musier-Forsyth, K. RiboCAT: A new capillary electrophoresis data analysis tool for nucleic acid probing. RNA 2017, 23, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Steen, K.A.; Rice, G.M.; Weeks, K.M. Fingerprinting noncanonical and tertiary RNA structures by differential SHAPE reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13160–13163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hura, G.L.; Menon, A.L.; Hammel, M.; Rambo, R.P.; Poole, F.L., II; Tsutakawa, S.E.; Jenney, F.E., Jr.; Classen, S.; Frankel, K.A.; Hopkins, R.C.; et al. Robust, high-throughput solution structural analyses by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cantara, W.A.; Olson, E.D.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Analysis of RNA structure using small-angle X-ray scattering. Methods 2017, 113, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Konarev, P.V.; Petoukhov, M.V.; Volkov, V.V.; Svergun, D.I. ATSAS2.1, a program package for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006, 39, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Acerbo, A.S.; Cook, M.J.; Gillilan, R.E. Upgrade of MacCHESS facility for X-ray scattering of biological macromolecules in solution. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2015, 22, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hopkins, J.B.; Gillilan, R.E.; Skou, S. BioXTAS RAW: Improvements to a free open-source program for small-angle X-ray scattering data reduction and analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2017, 50, 1545–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Skou, S.; Gillilan, R.E.; Ando, N. Synchrotron-based small-angle X-ray scattering of proteins in solution. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 1727–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Francin, M.; Mirande, M. Identity elements for specific aminoacylation of a tRNA by mammalian lysyl-tRNA synthetase bearing a nonspecific tRNA-interacting factor. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 10153–10160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Comandur, R.; Olson, E.D.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Conservation of tRNA mimicry in the 5′-untranslated region of distinct HIV-1 subtypes. RNA 2017, 23, 1850–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Keane, S.C.; Heng, X.; Lu, K.; Kharytonchyk, S.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Carter, G.; Barton, S.; Hosic, A.; Florwick, A.; Santos, J.; et al. RNA structure. Structure of the HIV-1 RNA packaging signal. Science 2015, 348, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Merino, E.J.; Wilkinson, K.A.; Coughlan, J.L.; Weeks, K.M. RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension (SHAPE). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4223–4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilkinson, K.A.; Merino, E.J.; Weeks, K.M. Selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE): Quantitative RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 1610–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. McGinnis, J.L.; Dunkle, J.A.; Cate, J.H.; Weeks, K.M. The mechanisms of RNA SHAPE chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6617–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Kenyon, J.C.; Prestwood, L.J.; Lever, A.M. A novel combined RNA-protein interaction analysis distinguishes HIV-1 Gag protein binding sites from structural change in the viral RNA leader. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Liu, S.; Harada, B.T.; Miller, J.T.; Le Grice, S.F.; Zhuang, X. Initiation complex dynamics direct the transitions between distinct phases of early HIV reverse transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Mathew, E.; Mirza, A.; Menhart, N. Liquid-chromatography-coupled SAXS for accurate sizing of aggregating proteins. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2004, 11, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Chen, J.; Nikolaitchik, O.; Singh, J.; Wright, A.; Bencsics, C.E.; Coffin, J.M.; Ni, N.; Lockett, S.; Pathak, V.K.; Hu, W.S. High efficiency of HIV-1 genomic RNA packaging and heterozygote formation revealed by single virion analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13535–13540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Goldschmidt, V.; Paillart, J.C.; Rigourd, M.; Ehresmann, B.; Aubertin, A.M.; Ehresmann, C.; Marquet, R. Structural variability of the initiation complex of HIV-1 reverse transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 35923–35931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hu, W.S.; Hughes, S.H. HIV-1 reverse transcription. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a006882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kleiman, L.; Jones, C.P.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Formation of the tRNALys packaging complex in HIV-1. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Brigham, B.S.; Kitzrow, J.P.; Reyes, J.C.; Musier-Forsyth, K.; Munro, J.B. Intrinsic conformational dynamics of the HIV-1 genomic RNA 5′ UTR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 10372–10381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Huthoff, H.; Berkhout, B. Two alternating structures of the HIV-1 leader RNA. RNA 2001, 7, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Abbink, T.E.; Ooms, M.; Haasnoot, P.C.; Berkhout, B. The HIV-1 leader RNA conformational switch regulates RNA dimerization but does not regulate mRNA translation. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 9058–9066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lu, K.; Heng, X.; Garyu, L.; Monti, S.; Garcia, E.L.; Kharytonchyk, S.; Dorjsuren, B.; Kulandaivel, G.; Jones, S.; Hiremath, A.; et al. NMR detection of structures in the HIV-1 5′-leader RNA that regulate genome packaging. Science 2011, 334, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Nikolaitchik, O.A.; Liu, S.; Kitzrow, J.P.; Liu, Y.; Rawson, J.M.O.; Shakya, S.; Cheng, Z.; Pathak, V.K.; Hu, W.S.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Selective packaging of HIV-1 RNA genome is guided by the stability of 5′ untranslated region polyA stem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2114494118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ye, L.; Gribling-Burrer, A.S.; Bohn, P.; Kibe, A.; Bortlein, C.; Ambi, U.B.; Ahmad, S.; Olguin-Nava, M.; Smith, M.; Caliskan, N.; et al. Short- and long-range interactions in the HIV-1 5′ UTR regulate genome dimerization and packaging. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2022, 29, 306–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Barat, C.; Lullien, V.; Schatz, O.; Keith, G.; Nugeyre, M.T.; Gruninger-Leitch, F.; Barre-Sinoussi, F.; LeGrice, S.F.; Darlix, J.L. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase specifically interacts with the anticodon domain of its cognate primer tRNA. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 3279–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jones, C.P.; Datta, S.A.; Rein, A.; Rouzina, I.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Matrix domain modulates HIV-1 Gag’s nucleic acid chaperone activity via inositol phosphate binding. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Proteins and RNAs used in this study. (A) The 532-residue human LysRS construct used for all experiments lacks the N-terminal 65 residues (LysRS(∆N65)). The phosphomimetic mutant replaces a serine at position 207 with an aspartate in the anticodon binding domain (S207D, red asterisk). (B) The UTR240 construct contains the U5/AUG stem (black), PBS/TLE domain (red, nt 126–224), and Psi domain (blue, nt 117–125 and 225–332). The gray boxed regions indicate the mutation that was made to replace the DIS with a stable GNRA tetraloop (∆DIS). The PBS/TLE domain was also deleted for some studies (ΔPBS/TLE) and replaced with GAGA. Nt in gray circles indicate mutations that were made to promote transcription efficiency and stabilize the terminal stem, as described in the Methods. The secondary structure shown is based on Ref [38].
Figure 1. Proteins and RNAs used in this study. (A) The 532-residue human LysRS construct used for all experiments lacks the N-terminal 65 residues (LysRS(∆N65)). The phosphomimetic mutant replaces a serine at position 207 with an aspartate in the anticodon binding domain (S207D, red asterisk). (B) The UTR240 construct contains the U5/AUG stem (black), PBS/TLE domain (red, nt 126–224), and Psi domain (blue, nt 117–125 and 225–332). The gray boxed regions indicate the mutation that was made to replace the DIS with a stable GNRA tetraloop (∆DIS). The PBS/TLE domain was also deleted for some studies (ΔPBS/TLE) and replaced with GAGA. Nt in gray circles indicate mutations that were made to promote transcription efficiency and stabilize the terminal stem, as described in the Methods. The secondary structure shown is based on Ref [38].
Viruses 14 01556 g001
Figure 2. SAXS analysis of LysRS-bound PBS/TLE complexes. The SAXS-derived ab initio envelope for PBS/TLE alone (blue) was overlaid with the envelopes calculated for PBS/TLE bound to either WT LysRS(∆N65) (grey mesh) or S207D LysRS(∆N65) (brown mesh).
Figure 2. SAXS analysis of LysRS-bound PBS/TLE complexes. The SAXS-derived ab initio envelope for PBS/TLE alone (blue) was overlaid with the envelopes calculated for PBS/TLE bound to either WT LysRS(∆N65) (grey mesh) or S207D LysRS(∆N65) (brown mesh).
Viruses 14 01556 g002
Figure 3. XL-SHAPE results for LysRS(∆N65) variants binding to WT UTR240. The baseline SHAPE reactivities are shown as colored circles behind each nt. Grey circles indicate the region of the structure that was not probed in our studies. SHAPE reactivity changes that occurred upon titration of WT LysRS(∆N65) (left) and S207D LysRS(∆N65) (right) are identified with colored arrows (red = increased reactivity, blue = decreased reactivity) and crosslinked sites are denoted with asterisks.
Figure 3. XL-SHAPE results for LysRS(∆N65) variants binding to WT UTR240. The baseline SHAPE reactivities are shown as colored circles behind each nt. Grey circles indicate the region of the structure that was not probed in our studies. SHAPE reactivity changes that occurred upon titration of WT LysRS(∆N65) (left) and S207D LysRS(∆N65) (right) are identified with colored arrows (red = increased reactivity, blue = decreased reactivity) and crosslinked sites are denoted with asterisks.
Viruses 14 01556 g003
Figure 4. SAXS analysis of the UTR240(ΔDIS). (A) SAXS envelope of the UTR240(ΔDIS) RNA (grey mesh). (B) Alignment of the UTR240(ΔDIS) with the envelope for UTR240(ΔDIS,ΔPBS/TLE) (blue spheres). (C) Each of the individual helices (PBS/TLE, red; U5-AUG, yellow; SL1, orange; SL3, purple) from a previously reported NMR structure [38] fit into specific regions of the UTR240(ΔDIS) SAXS envelope. (D) LysRS dimer crystal structure depicted at the same scale as the SAXS data with one monomer in red and the other in blue. Black brackets indicate approximate locations of LysRS binding sites determined by crosslinking.
Figure 4. SAXS analysis of the UTR240(ΔDIS). (A) SAXS envelope of the UTR240(ΔDIS) RNA (grey mesh). (B) Alignment of the UTR240(ΔDIS) with the envelope for UTR240(ΔDIS,ΔPBS/TLE) (blue spheres). (C) Each of the individual helices (PBS/TLE, red; U5-AUG, yellow; SL1, orange; SL3, purple) from a previously reported NMR structure [38] fit into specific regions of the UTR240(ΔDIS) SAXS envelope. (D) LysRS dimer crystal structure depicted at the same scale as the SAXS data with one monomer in red and the other in blue. Black brackets indicate approximate locations of LysRS binding sites determined by crosslinking.
Viruses 14 01556 g004
Figure 5. SAXS analysis of extended primer complexes. (A) Schematic of construct design for annealing of extended DNA primers (italic font) designed to disrupt the structure of the TLE stem. (B) SAXS-derived molecular envelope of the antiPBS18-annealed PBS/TLE construct. (C) SAXS-derived molecular envelopes for the PBS/TLE RNA with DNA primers of different lengths annealed. When aligned using the PBS loop as a reference, the location of the A-Bulge (cyan dot) rotates counterclockwise about the structure.
Figure 5. SAXS analysis of extended primer complexes. (A) Schematic of construct design for annealing of extended DNA primers (italic font) designed to disrupt the structure of the TLE stem. (B) SAXS-derived molecular envelope of the antiPBS18-annealed PBS/TLE construct. (C) SAXS-derived molecular envelopes for the PBS/TLE RNA with DNA primers of different lengths annealed. When aligned using the PBS loop as a reference, the location of the A-Bulge (cyan dot) rotates counterclockwise about the structure.
Viruses 14 01556 g005
Figure 6. Model of pS207–LysRS-directed primer placement to PBS and subsequent pS207–LysRS release from HIV-1 gRNA. (Step 1) Upon HIV-1 infection, LysRS is phosphorylated on S207 and is released from the multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex (MSC) in a conformation inactive for tRNA aminoacylation. (Step 2) The HIV-1 gRNA can adopt various monomeric and dimeric conformations, including the “kissing loop” dimer shown. (Step 3) The catalytically inactive, tRNA-bound pS207–LysRS dimer preferentially binds to the PBS/TLE and SL1 regions of an HIV-1 gRNA dimer. This binding results in release of tRNA from LysRS and an increase in the dynamics of the PBS region and SL1 hairpin (blue squiggles). (Step 4) HIV-1 Gag facilitates annealing of the tRNA primer onto the PBS via chaperone activity of the nucleocapsid domain. (Step 5) After maturation, reverse transcriptase (RT) binds the primer:template complex and (Step 6) initiates proviral DNA synthesis (purple extension) leading to disruption of the TLE conformation and pS207–LysRS release. For clarity, the second gRNA monomer is not shown after Step 4.
Figure 6. Model of pS207–LysRS-directed primer placement to PBS and subsequent pS207–LysRS release from HIV-1 gRNA. (Step 1) Upon HIV-1 infection, LysRS is phosphorylated on S207 and is released from the multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex (MSC) in a conformation inactive for tRNA aminoacylation. (Step 2) The HIV-1 gRNA can adopt various monomeric and dimeric conformations, including the “kissing loop” dimer shown. (Step 3) The catalytically inactive, tRNA-bound pS207–LysRS dimer preferentially binds to the PBS/TLE and SL1 regions of an HIV-1 gRNA dimer. This binding results in release of tRNA from LysRS and an increase in the dynamics of the PBS region and SL1 hairpin (blue squiggles). (Step 4) HIV-1 Gag facilitates annealing of the tRNA primer onto the PBS via chaperone activity of the nucleocapsid domain. (Step 5) After maturation, reverse transcriptase (RT) binds the primer:template complex and (Step 6) initiates proviral DNA synthesis (purple extension) leading to disruption of the TLE conformation and pS207–LysRS release. For clarity, the second gRNA monomer is not shown after Step 4.
Viruses 14 01556 g006
Table 1. Dissociation constants (Kd) for WT and S207D LysRS(∆N65) binding to HIV-1 RNAs.
Table 1. Dissociation constants (Kd) for WT and S207D LysRS(∆N65) binding to HIV-1 RNAs.
Kd (nM ± SD)
RNAWT LysRS(ΔN65)S207D LysRS(ΔN65)
tRNALys3407 ± 33 a470 ± 190 b
PBS/TLE105330 ± 115315 ± 130
UTR240146 ± 47139 ± 45
UTR240(ΔDIS)315 ± 142482 ± 103
All measurements were performed with 30 nM RNA in 15 mM NaCl, 35 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, and 1 mM MgCl2. Results are the average of at least three trials with the standard deviation (SD) indicated. Binding data from Ref [17] a and Ref [15] b.
Table 2. Equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) for human WT LysRS(∆N65) and S207D LysRS(∆N65) binding PBS/TLE105:antiPBS complexes.
Table 2. Equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) for human WT LysRS(∆N65) and S207D LysRS(∆N65) binding PBS/TLE105:antiPBS complexes.
RNA-DNA ComplexKd (nM ± SD)
RNADNA PrimerWT LysRS(ΔN65)S207D LysRS(ΔN65)TLE Rotation
PBS/TLE105antiPBS18240 ± 95417 ± 90
PBS/TLE105antiPBS18+3488 ± 171305 ± 75~65°
PBS/TLE105antiPBS18+6865 ± 379590 ± 182~145°
PBS/TLE105antiPBS18+111008 ± 639949 ± 148~225°
All binding measurements were performed with 30 nM RNA in 15 mM NaCl, 35 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, and 1 mM MgCl2. Results are the average of at least three trials with the SD indicated. All TLE rotation values are approximated by orienting the SAXS envelopes as shown in Figure 5C and drawing a line from the A-bulge to the TLE loop regions of the envelopes. The lines were then compared to reflect the approximate counterclockwise rotation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cantara, W.A.; Pathirage, C.; Hatterschide, J.; Olson, E.D.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Phosphomimetic S207D Lysyl–tRNA Synthetase Binds HIV-1 5′UTR in an Open Conformation and Increases RNA Dynamics. Viruses 2022, 14, 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14071556

AMA Style

Cantara WA, Pathirage C, Hatterschide J, Olson ED, Musier-Forsyth K. Phosphomimetic S207D Lysyl–tRNA Synthetase Binds HIV-1 5′UTR in an Open Conformation and Increases RNA Dynamics. Viruses. 2022; 14(7):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14071556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cantara, William A., Chathuri Pathirage, Joshua Hatterschide, Erik D. Olson, and Karin Musier-Forsyth. 2022. "Phosphomimetic S207D Lysyl–tRNA Synthetase Binds HIV-1 5′UTR in an Open Conformation and Increases RNA Dynamics" Viruses 14, no. 7: 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14071556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop