Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Tree Species on Microbial Community Structure and Soil Function on Forest Plantations in the Central Hardwoods Region (CHR)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Compost Tea in a Containerized Urban Tree Nursery Shows No Evident Benefits to Tree Growth or Mycorrhizal Colonization
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Effect of Biochar Amendment, Microbiome Inoculation, Crop Mixture and Planting Density on Post-Mining Restoration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Hydraulic and Aeration Properties of Peat Substrates Used to Produce Containerized White Spruce Seedlings (1+0) in Forest Nurseries

1
Centre de Recherche et d’Innovation sur les Végétaux, Département des Sols et de Génie Agroalimentaire, Pavillon de l’Envirotron, Université Laval, 2480 boul. Hochelaga, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
2
Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et des Forêts du Québec, Direction de la Recherche Forestière, 2700 Rue Einstein, Québec, QC G1P 3W8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(4), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040858
Submission received: 13 March 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Production in Forest Nurseries and Field Performance of Seedlings)

Abstract

:
The physical properties of peat substrates from eight tree nurseries were characterized to determine bulk density, air-filled porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity, pore effectiveness, relative gas diffusivity and chemical properties. There were significant variations among nurseries both in growth of white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] seedlings (1+0) and substrate properties. Shoot dry mass and root collar diameter were negatively correlated with air-filled porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity, whereas root dry mass was positively correlated with bulk density. Seedling growth increased with increasing substrate bulk density up to ~0.11 g cm−3, above which value conditions may become limiting to plant performance. Our results suggest that there was no growth limitation due to restricted aeration (Ds D0−1 > 0.005 m2 s−1 m−2 s for all substrates except one) and that over-aeration reduced seedling growth under dry irrigation management.

1. Introduction

Nearly 147 million forest seedlings are produced annually in the 18 forest nurseries (6 government and 12 private) in Quebec, Canada [1]. In 2021, white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] accounted for 22.6% of the seedlings produced in Quebec, i.e., nearly 30 million seedlings [2]. Before planting, the seedlings are evaluated according to morpho-physiological quality criteria and standards established by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forests (QC, Canada) [3]. Among these criteria, root insufficiency is one of the main causes of plant rejection [4]. In the case of root insufficiency, the plant will be rejected if the root plug partially or completely breaks after extraction from the cavity, shows distinct portions bound by an undamaged root system with more than 5 mm of discontinuity between the portions or if more than 33% of the roots located at the periphery are dead or necrotic [2]. These discarded seedlings obviously have a negative impact on the profitability and long-term viability of nurseries. Various studies have focused on the control and optimization of the main cultural practices, in particular irrigation, fertilization and the model of the container (shape and volume of the cavity, number of seedlings m−2) to improve growth and root architecture [5,6,7,8]. However, few studies have focused on the evaluation of the physicochemical properties of substrates in relation to the growth of forest seedlings at an operational scale.
Extreme conditions of substrate water content such as excess water and water stress negatively influence plant physiology, root growth and mineral nutrition [6,9,10,11,12]. In addition, net photosynthesis decreases with increasing substrate water content when aeration becomes a limiting factor [13]. Optimizing the physicochemical and aeration properties of the substrate is a critical factor to further improve root growth.
A good artificial growing substrate should have good aeration, high water retention properties, relatively high cation exchange capacity (CEC), be easy to handle and available at low cost [14]. The substrates used in forest nurseries in Quebec are essentially composed of peat and a small proportion of vermiculite and/or perlite. It is common practice in forest nurseries in Quebec to use blond peat with little humification characterized by a high water retention capacity and air content. It has a low pH and a relatively high CEC, two chemical properties ideal for the production and growth of containerized forest seedlings [15]. However, the physicochemical properties of peat can vary depending on its origin and degree of humification [11,16]. In addition, the supply of low-humified peat tends to become difficult with the increase in the duration of peatland exploitation and the scarcity of those exploited near nurseries [17]. The different stages of peat handling, from harvesting to potting, can lead to changes in its physical properties. For example, the type of mixer used to prepare the substrate and a long mixing time can increase the proportion of fine particles [13]. Inappropriate humification and handling of the peat will have the effect of increasing the water retention capacity of the substrate and reducing its air-filled porosity (θa), thus increasing the risk of root asphyxiation and waterlogging [11]. Moreover, the height of the saturated zone at the bottom of the root plug after irrigation or rainfall events increases in fine-textured peat substrates, which may further limit gas exchange in the rhizosphere [15].
The physical properties of the substrate can influence the growth of plants [14,18] and forest seedlings [9,13,19,20], in particular air-filled porosity (θa), which is largely used as an index of aeration in peat substrates. However, gas exchange between substrates and ambient air also depends on pores’ connection in the growing medium; consequently, high θa values are not always indicative of adequate substrate aeration. The relative diffusivity of gases (Ds D0−1; estimated from measurements of θa, pore tortuosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity) has been shown to be a better parameter than air-filled porosity to investigate how substrate aeration properties affect the development and growth of plant species [21,22]. Our previous study showed that the relative gas diffusivity of peat substrates should not be lower than 0.003 to 0.005 cm2 s cm−2 s−1 for growth of white spruce seedlings [20]. However, to our knowledge, no study has verified the effect of Ds D0−1 in peat–vermiculite potting substrates on the growth of roots and shoots of forest seedlings produced in containers under tunnels during the first growing season in several tree nurseries.
The general objective of this study consists in characterizing the substrates used in the forest nurseries of Quebec using the index of their relative diffusivity of gases and their physicochemical properties in relation to the growth of white spruce seedlings (1+0) during the first growing season under forest nursery conditions. Physical properties were determined directly in the containers to minimize the impact of handling on the fragile structure of the artificial substrates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Substrate Samples from Forest Nurseries

Peat substrates were collected at the beginning and end of the growing season from 8 out of 18 tree nurseries that produce containerized white spruce seedlings in Quebec (Figure 1). These nurseries were located in different ecological regions (bioclimatic domains), between 46°04′–48°49′ N lat. and 65°51′–74°38′ W long. (Figure 1). Accordingly, the number of growing degree-day units (mean air temperature above 5 °C) during the vegetative season varied between 1250 and 2000 among the different nurseries. For confidentiality purposes, we assigned a number from 1 to 8 to each forest nursery included in the study (see Section 3.2).

2.2. Production of White Spruce Seedlings (1+0)

White spruce seeds were sown into containers (model IPL 25-310: 25 cavities per container, 310 cm3 per cavity, each 12 cm in height with top and base diameters of 6.5 cm and 5.2 cm; IPL®, Saint-Damien-de-Buckland, QC, Canada) between 7 and 20 May 2008, depending on the ecological region. Containers were filled with substrates composed of sphagnum peat moss of various grades (specific to each nursery) provided by Quebec and New Brunswick peat suppliers. Horticultural grade 3 or 4 vermiculite was added to all substrates in proportions that varied among nurseries from 9 to 40% (v v−1); only the substrate of nursery 8 included perlite (9%, v v−1). White spruce seedlings were cultivated under unheated polyethylene tunnels, with irrigation and fertilization management practices tailored to the operational conditions of each tree nursery. The amount of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), potassium (K) and oligo-nutrients that seedlings received during the growing season (see Table 1) were based on the fertility of peat substrates and seedlings’ developmental stage and nutritional needs in order to meet the required growth standards for white spruce (1+0) stock [24,25]. The irrigation was adjusted by nursery managers according to seedling size; the volumetric water content (θv) of substrates was determined using time domain reflectometry [6,26] or gravimetric methods [27]. Typically, irrigation management under tunnel resulted in substrate water contents of about 0.35 to 0.45 cm3 cm−3.

2.3. Physical Properties of Peat Substrates

One week after potting and prior to seeding, five containers were randomly selected in each tree nursery and brought back to the laboratory to determine the physical properties of the substrates in situ (i.e., on root plugs in containers). Bulk density (ρb) was evaluated for three individual cavities per container by measuring the volume and dry weight (oven-dried at 105 °C for 24 h) of each root plug. Total porosity (θt) was measured on the same three samples by determining the organic matter content after calcination at 550 °C [28]. Particle size distribution was measured for 650 mL air-dried composite substrate samples (n = 3 root plugs) sieved mechanically (shaker model RX-29, W. S. Tylers®, Mentor, OH, USA) for 3 min on a nest of sieves (0.106, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 mm stacked over a pan). The mean weight diameter (MWD) of particles was calculated as described by Kemper and Roseneau [29]:
MWD = i = 1 n x i f i
where xi is the weight fraction retained on the ith sieve divided by the total substrate sample mass, fi is the average particle size on the ith sieve, and n is the number of size classes, here equal to 8.
Containers with remaining root plugs were slowly saturated by gradually increasing the water level at a rate of 0.5 cm h−1 for 24 h; substrates were then drained freely for 2 h to determine the volumetric water content at container capacity (θc, which corresponds to a matric potential of −0.6 kPa, i.e., at mid-height of the IPL 25–310 container). Substrate water content was measured using a 10.5 cm long three-rod (0.2 cm in diameter, spaced at 1 cm apart) TDR probe inserted vertically within a cavity and a cable tester (model 1502B, Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA) (Figure 2). For all θv determinations, dielectric constants (Ka) between 5 and 50.8 were converted to θv using the Ka–θv equation established by Paquet et al. [30], which was found appropriate for these substrates [20]. Values of Ka between 50.8 and 81 were linearly interpolated from θv at Ka = 50.8 to θv = 1.0 cm3 cm−3 at Ka = 81. The air-filled porosity after drainage (θa) was calculated as
θ a = θ t θ c
Five substrate root plugs were carefully extracted from each nursery container and placed in a linear five-cavity container, with the lower end of the 310 cm3 cavities covered with mosquito netting. The five-cavity containers were slowly saturated as described above and then placed on a tension table under a plastic cover. Substrate moisture content was determined using a 36 cm long two-rod (1.5 cm spacing) TDR probe with shorting diodes at the beginning and end of the probe, inserted horizontally into the container across the five cavities at a height of 8 cm from the bottom of the cavities [26]. A correction factor was used for the calculation of Ka to account for propagation time that was not related to the substrate within the five cavities [26].
To determine the matric potential at which air first enters the substrate when going from saturated to unsaturated conditions (ψa, the point of air entry; Nemati et al. [31]), the five-cavity containers were rewetted from the bottom up to full saturation overnight and then placed on a tension table with a water potential of 0.6 kPa (i.e., a water head of 6 cm above the surface of the tension table). The matric potential (ψ) at mid-container height was reduced from 0 to −0.8 kPa by decreasing the water level in 0.2 kPa steps and the substrate θv was measured via TDR at each ψ step following a 2 h equilibrium period. From these ψ–θv curves, ψa was estimated visually and corresponded to the matric potential when a significant drop in θv was observed. If air entry had not occurred at −0.8 kPa, substrate ψ was further reduced from −0.8 to −1.2 kPa. For these measurements, matric potentials were evaluated from the height of the water level above the surface of the tension table, from which 0.125 kPa was subtracted to account for the zone of influence of the TDR probe (i.e., the distance required to detect a change in θv; see Caron et al. [32] and Boudreault et al. [20]). Afterward, substrates were covered by a plastic sheet to prevent evaporation and their water release curve was established by measuring θv at matric potentials of −1.4, −1.6, −1.8, −3, −5 and −10 kPa. The available (AW) and easily available (EAW) water content in the substrates were estimated from θc (ψ = −0.6 kPa) and values of θv at ψ = −10 kPa and −5 kPa, respectively [33].
EAW = θ c θ 5 kPa
AW = θ c θ 10 kPa
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) was determined on three individual cavities per container per nursery using an infiltrometer that provided a constant flow of water at the surface of the sample [28]. Substrates were saturated as described above; once steady-state conditions of water flow through the substrate were achieved, the pressure gradient and the flow of water were measured and Ks estimated using Darcy’s law. A correction factor of 1.22 was used to account for the slightly conical shape of the cavity and narrowing of the wall near the bottom of the cavity (see Figure 1 in Boudreault et al. [20]). The aeration properties of the substrates were then determined using measured values of ψa and Ks and data from the water-release curve based on the multiple-point method described by Allaire et al. [18] and Caron and Nkongolo [22]. Briefly, this method consists in determining the parameters of the water desorption curve using a nonlinear, five-parameter function adapted to artificial substrates [34]:
θ = θ r + θ θ r 1 + a ψ n b
where θ is the substrate volumetric water content (cm3 cm−3), ψ is the matric potential (kPa), θr is the residual water content (cm3 cm−3) and a, b and n are empirical parameters determined by minimizing the error between estimates of Equation (5) and points of the water release curve using Mathcad 7. Once established, the function was used with Ks values to determine the coefficient of pore effectiveness (γ) following
γ = 0.00028 ρ g η K s θ r θ ψ a a 2 θ s θ r θ θ r 1 b 1 2 n d θ 1
where θψa is the water content at air entry value (cm3 cm−3), θs is the water content at saturation (cm3 cm−3), ρ is water density (g cm−3), g is the gravitational acceleration (m s−2) and η is the viscosity of water (0.001 Pa s at 20°C). Because g represents the tortuosity, constriction and continuity of pores in the substrate, Ds D0−1 can be estimated using the equation from King and Smith [35], generalized for artificial media:
D s D 0 = γ   θ a
Equation (7) provides an estimate of relative gas diffusivity at an average ψ of −0.6 kPa found in the 25–310 nursery containers when substrates are at container capacity.

2.4. Chemical Properties of Peat Substrates

Mineral nutrients, effective cation exchange capacity (CECeff), pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined for substrates sampled from the eight tree nurseries prior to seeding. The substrate from three cavities per container was air-dried in the laboratory and combined to form a composite sample (n = 5 per nursery). Major cations were extracted from each composite sample with a 1 mol L−1 solution of NH4Cl and CECeff was calculated as the sum of exchangeable bases plus actual acidity [36]. The nutrient (cation) composition of each extract was then measured using plasma atomic emission spectrometry (Model ICAP 9000, Thermo Instruments, Franklin, MA, USA) [36] The concentrations of NH4–N, NO2–N, NO3–N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the substrates were measured in saturated aqueous extracts [36,37]. After extraction, the mineral N concentration was determined by colorimetry using a continuous flow spectrophotometer (QuickChem 8000, Lachat Instruments, Loveland, CO, USA), while P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations were determined by atomic emission spectrometry with plasma (ICAP 61E, Thermo Instruments, Franklin, MA, USA) [36,37]. Substrate pH and EC were measured directly on the aqueous extracts without reporting the results on a dry basis [38]. Mineral nutrient analyses of substrates were determined at the organic and inorganic chemistry laboratory of the Quebec Forest Research Branch.

2.5. Growth and Nutrition of White Spruce Seedlings (1+0) and Physical Properties of Substrates after One Growing Season

In spring 2009, three containers were randomly selected prior to bud burst in each of the eight tree nurseries to determine the growth parameters and nutrient content of white spruce seedlings (1+0). Seedling height and root collar diameter were measured in the laboratory on ten seedlings randomly selected per container (n = 30 per nursery). Seedlings were then severed at the root collar and their root system was carefully washed by hand. The root and shoot dry masses of these seedlings were measured after oven-drying at 70 °C for 48 h. Nutrient concentrations in root and shoot tissues were determined for three composite samples per tree nursery, each consisting of the ten seedlings per container used to determine growth parameters. After tissue grinding and acid digestion, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations were measured by atomic emission spectrometry with plasma (ICAP 61E, Thermo Instruments), whereas N concentration was determined using the Kjeldahl method (flow injection colorimetry; QuickChem 8000, Lachat Instruments). All mineral nutrient analyses were performed at the organic and inorganic chemistry laboratory of the Quebec Forest Research Branch. Additionally, the bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity of substrates collected in spring 2009 were each measured on three different cavities per container. Volumetric water content at saturation (i.e., total porosity, θt) and container capacity (θc) were also determined to estimate air-filled porosity after drainage (θa) using Equation (2).

2.6. Statistical Analyses

An analysis of variance followed by a protected LSD test were used to compare substrate physical properties, seedling growth parameters and nutrient concentrations among tree nurseries (with significance determined at p < 0.05). Pearson’s correlation coefficients and linear regressions were computed to examine the relationships between growth parameters of white spruce and the physical properties (ρb, θa, EAW, AW, Ks, MWD, γ and Ds D0−1) of substrates after potting. A similar analysis was performed with values of ρb, θa and Ks obtained after one year of growth (i.e., on substrates sampled in spring 2009). All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Physical Properties of Forest Nursery Substrates

The mean weight diameter (MWD) of particles varied between 1.17 and 3.06 mm after potting, with a mean (±SD) value of 1.92 ± 0.57 mm across all nurseries (Figure 3). Whereas the fraction of particles with a diameter of 1 to 4 mm varied from 25% in the substrate from nursery 1 to 52% in those from nurseries 5 and 6, there was a five-fold increase in the fraction of fine particles (<0.5 mm) in substrates from nursery 6 compared to those from nursery 1 (Figure 3). A greater water retention was observed in the substrates from nursery 1 and 5 over most of the measured range of matric potentials, while substrates from nurseries 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 had similar water release curves (Figure 4).
The average saturated hydraulic conductivity of substrates after potting was 0.06 ± 0.01 cm s−1, with values ranging from 0.02 (nursery 1) to 0.11 cm s−1 (nursery 6) (Table 2). Substrate bulk density, which varied between 0.076 and 0.105 g cm−3, differed significantly (p < 0.001) among forest nurseries, those of nursery 1 and 5 having the highest ρb values (Table 2). There was little variation in total porosity of the substrates sampled after potting (0.944 ± 0.001 cm3 cm−3), yet the air-filled porosity (θa) was three times higher in substrates from nurseries 3 and 7 (>0.14 cm3 cm−3) compared to that of nursery 1 (0.04 cm3 cm−3) (Table 2). While no significant difference was observed in the easily available water (EAW) content of substrates (p = 0.09), values of AW differed significantly among nursery substrates (p < 0.001). EAW and AW averaged over all substrates after potting were 0.31 ± 0.04 cm3 cm−3 and 0.42 ± 0.02 cm3 cm−3, respectively. There was no significant difference in pore effectiveness coefficient (γ) or relative gas diffusivity (Ds D0−1) among the eight substrates (Table 2). Values of γ changed relatively little across the different substrates, ranging from 6.6% in nursery 2 to 11.8% in nursery 6. The substrate from nursery 1 had the lowest Ds D0−1 value (0.0041 m2 s−1 m−2 s), whereas the highest relative gas diffusivity was found in the substrate from nursery 3 (0.0171 m2 s−1 m−2 s), in accordance with its high air-filled porosity.

3.2. Growth of White Spruce Seedlings (1+0)

The provenance of white spruce seedlings had a significant effect on measured growth parameters (Table 3). For instance, there was a 78% difference in shoot dry mass of seedlings between nursery 1 (1244 mg) and nursery 8 (277 mg), while root dry mass differed by 68% among sampled forest nurseries (Table 3). Average seedling height at the end of the growing season varied between 6.4 and 12.9 cm, whereas mean root collar diameter ranged from 1.36 to 3.39 mm. Furthermore, nutrient concentrations in the shoot tissues of white spruce seedlings were significantly different among nursery substrates (p < 0.05; Table 3).

3.3. Correlations between Seedling Growth Parameters and Substrate Physicochemical Properties

There were no correlations between morphological variables (height, root collar diameter, shoot dry mass, root dry mass) of white spruce seedlings and the 10 physical properties of substrates from eight forest nurseries after potting (Table 4). However, significant correlations were found between growth parameters and substrate physical properties measured at the end of the growing season (Ks_1, ρb_1 and θa_1). A significant linear relationship was observed between saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks_1) and shoot dry weight (r = −0.53, p = 0.008), root collar diameter (r = −0.42, p = 0.039) and height/diameter ratio (r = 0.41, p = 0.042). Air-filled porosity (θa_1) was significantly negatively correlated with shoot dry weight (r = −0.53, p = 0.008; Figure 5) and collar diameter (r = −0.51, p = 0.01). Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between the bulk density of substrates (ρb_1) and root dry weight (r = 0.63, p < 0.001; Table 4 and Figure 6). Morphological variables were also significantly correlated with the quantity of nitrogen (Ntotal), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) applied per seedling. A positive linear relation was observed between the dose of applied P and shoot dry weight (r = 0.84, p = 0.019) as well as seedling height (r = 0.82, p = 0.021). Root collar diameter was correlated with the doses of applied N (r = 0.80, p = 0.030) and P (r = 0.86, p = 0.011), whereas the H/D ratio was negatively related to applied N (r = −0.81, p = 0.026).

4. Discussion

Significant differences were observed between the physical properties of the substrates from the eight forest nurseries, despite the similarity of the different components of the substrates used to produce forest seedlings in Quebec [39]. The exception was the substrate from nursery 5, which contained a little more than 45% of particles larger than 1.7 mm (Figure 3). None of the substrates had a coarse (>2 mm)-to-fine particle ratio greater than 50%, as proposed as an acceptable standard for container forest seedling production [40]. It has been shown that the growth of white spruce seedlings produced in greenhouses was greater during the first year of production when the substrate was composed of fine particles (<1.3 mm) [9]. However, no significant relationship could be observed between MWD and growth variables during our study.
The θa of the substrates at container capacity measured just after potting varied between 0.04 and 0.17 cm3 cm−3 (Table 2) and was similar to θa values reported in the literature for this type of substrate [19,41,42]. Except for air-filled porosity observed in the substrate from nursery 1, these values were near the lowest limit for acceptable gas diffusion (i.e., θa~0.10 cm3 cm−3) [43] as well as adequate root growth and respiration (i.e., θa~0.10–0.15 cm3 cm−3) [44] and should likely have limited plant growth under a wet irrigation management. The significant negative correlations observed between θa and Ks measured after one growing season and the growth variables instead indicated that low aeration of the substrate did not limit seedling growth, but instead suggested that too much aeration decreases shoot growth (Table 4, Figure 5). This would also be consistent with water stress affecting seedling growth. Indeed, these results are very similar to those obtained in a companion study for one-year growth (year 2008 in [20]). For aeration, this could be explained by the low need of conifers for aeration [45], especially during the first growing season, when the cavity volume is not very limiting for root growth. Moreover, for the correlation, θa was measured at container capacity (ψ = −0.6 kPa), a matric potential that is rarely maintained for long periods after irrigation [42] as the irrigation threshold was most likely less than −5 kPa based on the recommended threshold of 0.30–0.45 cm3 cm−3 substrate water content to initiate irrigation.
Water stress appeared most likely to explain these negative correlations for the first year of growth, as previously reported [20]. Indeed, the irrigation system used in forest nurseries tends to maintain a volumetric water content between 0.30 and 0.45 cm3 cm−3. The desorption curves presented in Figure 4 well describe the reduction of water content in substrates and its replacement by air under a matric potential of −0.6 kPa, and indicate threshold water potentials to trigger irrigation far below −5 kPa and even −10 kPa for most substrates, threshold values below which growth limitations were reported for Prunus × cystena [46] and attributed to too-low values of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Results were also consistent with a decrease in shoot growth with decreasing water potential in our parallel study for the first year (2008 in [20]). Under a dry irrigation management, at water potentials below −2 kPa, θa was high (>0.15 cm3 cm−3) for most substrates from the eight nurseries. Values of θa at ψ = −0.6 kPa (see Figure 4) were then likely uncommon in substrates during the growing season under forest nursery conditions, which greatly facilitated the presence of air-filled pores [6,7].
Aeration limitations in substrates also appeared very unlikely based on relative gas diffusivity measurements, even if wet conditions may have prevailed occasionally in the container between irrigation events. Ds D0−1 values obtained in this study for peat substrates used in eight forest nurseries (0.0041–0.0171 m2 s−1 m−2 s) were similar to those observed by Boudreault et al. [20] (Ds D0−1 = 0.0026 to 0.0105 m2 s−1 m−2 s), Caron et al. ([47]; Ds D0−1 = 0.0026 to 0.0105 m2 s−1 m−2 s) and Caron and Nkongolo ([22]; Ds D0−1 = 0.0067 to 0.0230 m2 s−1 m−2 s) using the same method. Allaire et al. [18] reported Ds D0−1 values that ranged between 0.006 and 0.018 m2 s−1 m−2 s for horticultural substrates. Pore effectiveness and Ds D0−1 measured at container capacity did not show any significant correlation with seedling growth variables (Table 4) contrary to several studies where positive linear relationships were observed between these variables for a similar Ds D0−1 range in peat and bark substrates [18,48,49]. For instance, Allaire et al. [18] established a relative gas diffusivity threshold of 0.015 m2 s−1 m−2 s to promote the growth of Prunus × cistena in 5 L (21 cm high × 18 cm diameter) containers. Meanwhile, Boudreault et al. [20] suggested, based on modeled O2 profiles in root plugs (310 cm3 cavities; 12 cm high × 6.5 cm diameter with ~5 cm2 hole at bottom for drainage and air exchange) and observed Ds D0−1–root growth relationship for the same tree seedling species (see Figure 5 in [20]), that nursery substrates should have a relative gas diffusivity greater than ~0.004 m2 s−1 m−2 s when matric potential is maintained within the 0 to −5 kPa range. This apparent discrepancy between relative gas diffusivity minimal values may be due to the fact that the seedlings from forest nurseries were grown in cavities of reduced height and radius compared to the pots commonly used in horticultural nurseries (1 L and more). Unlike horticultural pots, the cavities of containers used by forest nurseries had a greater surface area available for gas exchange relative to volume. This surface is made up of the upper part (top) of the root plug, but also of the contour of the cavity, where gas exchange capacity is accentuated by root water uptake during substrate drying (see Boudreault et al. [20]). Moreover, the bottom of the root plug is directly exposed to air, as opposed to the 5 L containers in Allaire et al. [18], which had five small drainage holes at the bottom of the container not directly exposed to air. Hence, although the Ds D0−1 values measured here were typically below the 0.015 m2 s−1 m−2 s threshold, they were higher than the 0.004 m2 s−1 m−2 threshold obtained by Boudreault et al. [20]), and therefore the white spruce seedling growth was unlikely limited by aeration.
The level of peat humification, reduction in particle size and compaction of the substrate at potting can increase bulk density, which also generally increases during the growing season [9,11]. A significant positive correlation was observed between bulk density and root dry mass (Table 4; Figure 6). Low bulk density could affect plant water supply, resulting in lower total plant mass [20]. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is also low in peat substrates under dry conditions [46,50,51]. On the other hand, large particle size combined with low bulk density can reduce unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, which could limit water transfer for substrates under dry irrigation management, as suggested by our data and previous work for the same species [20].
Total porosity values for sampled substrates were similar to those reported in the literature for blond and brown fibric peat [11,16,52,53,54]. Moreover, substrates from the eight forest nurseries showed desorption curves similar to those observed in other studies [10,54]. Overall, the available and easily available water content varied little among substrates (Table 2). This is not surprising, as the volumetric water content at −5 and −10 kPa were similar, except for the substrate from nursery 1, which had a generally higher water content (Figure 4). Bernier and Gonzalez [9] observed a positive correlation between root dry mass and easily available water. However, this relationship was not observed in the present study, which may be due to irrigation management and environmental conditions between nurseries.
Given the importance of bulk density when packing growing media in seedling trays at the nursery operation scale, the shape of the curve in Figure 6 is of practical interest and should be analyzed cautiously. First, the results suggest a plateau around 0.10 to 0.11 g cm−3, with a possible decrease beyond 0.11 g cm−3. Higher values may possibly lead to growth decreases, as reported by Boudreault et al. [20] for their second-year (2009) data, when seedlings were exposed to outdoor conditions. Further, the conclusion applies to the first year only, as with time the substrate will significantly evolve and become more compacted. Seedling responses will also be altered in the second year, when plants will be brought into outdoor conditions for their second-year growth, which may expose the substrate to prolonged wet conditions [20]. Boudreault et al. [20] consistently reported results similar to those above for the first year, but observed important aeration limitations when substrates were more compacted in the second year.
Fertilization applied during the growing season influenced seedling growth and development, as demonstrated by correlations between substrate fertility (Ntotal and P concentrations) and shoot dry mass, height and root-collar diameter (Table 4). The amount of mineral nutrients needed in each forest nursery during the growing season (Table 1) is calculated based on growth standards to be achieved (height, root and shoot dry masses, etc.) in order to optimize the concentration of nutrients in the substrate and in shoot and root tissues [24]. Hence, the different fertilization regimes used by nursery growers may have masked some of the relationships between the physicochemical properties of the substrates and the growth variables of white spruce seedlings. The concentrations of mineral nutrients in shoots were, however, within recommended ranges for the growth and physiological processes (net photosynthesis, etc.) of white spruce seedlings in all nurseries (for instance, foliar nitrogen was 2.4% to 3%; Table 3) [55,56,57]. Before the delivery of seedlings to reforestation sites and payment to forest nurseries in Quebec, seedlings are evaluated and must meet 27 morphophysiological quality standards, including leaf nitrogen concentration [3]. To this end, nurseries must respect the optimal thresholds of the main cultural practices (peat substrate, irrigation, fertilization, short-day treatment, etc.) to achieve these 27 quality standards and reduce seedling losses and production costs [4,58,59]. Another factor to be considered when examining relations between the physical properties of substrates and conifer seedling biomass is root growth throughout the growing season. As roots develop, they occupy the pore space of the growing medium, consume oxygen and affect gas diffusion in the rhizosphere, which may also impact root and shoot growth [60,61,62].

5. Conclusions

This characterization of the physicochemical properties of substrates from eight forest nurseries highlighted a range of quality in local peat. While substrate chemical properties were similar, their physical properties varied significantly. The low intrinsic aeration of substrates did not limit the root and shoot growth of white spruce seedlings (1+0). Conversely, seedling growth was lower in substrates with high air-filled porosity. Our findings suggest that the air-filled porosity at container capacity of forest nursery substrates should be between 0.03 and 0.10 cm3 cm−3 to improve the root and shoot growth of white spruce seedlings (1+0). Moreover, a substrate bulk density between 0.07 and 0.115 g cm−3 had a positive effect on root biomass. This is likely due to irrigation management resulting in drier substrate conditions during this first year of growth under a polyethylene tunnel, where controlled irrigation maintains relatively low water content and adequate air-filled porosity. However, a few forest nursery substrates had low air-filled porosity values at container capacity and low pore effectiveness coefficients, which could hinder root growth and development during the second growing season when seedlings are cultivated outdoors and thus exposed to prevailing weather conditions (i.e., rainfall). This hypothesis should be tested by further study of their second year of growth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P., J.C., M.S.L. and S.B.; methodology, S.P., J.C., S.B. and M.S.L.; software, S.B.; validation, S.B., S.P., J.C. and M.S.L.; formal analysis, S.B.; investigation, S.B., S.P., J.C. and M.S.L.; resources, S.P.; data curation, S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B., S.P., M.S.L. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, S.B., S.P., M.S.L. and J.C.; visualization, S.B.; supervision, S.P., J.C. and M.S.L.; project administration, S.P.; funding acquisition, S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies (Partnerships Research Program on Forest Management and Environment III: grant n° 2008-FT-124361), awarded to S. Pepin.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the forest nurseries that provided us with potting substrates and tree seedlings, as well as Jean-François Bernier, Anne-Isabelle Bonifassi, Marie-Ève Giroux and Andrée-Ann Prince for their involvement in this project. We would also like to thank Carole Boily (Laval University), Bertrand Fecteau and Luc Godin (pépinière Pampev Inc.) and the staff of the Organic and Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory of the Forest Research Branch of the Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources and Forests for their participation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lefebvre, S. La Production de Plants Forestiers: Enjeux et Perspectives. In Proceedings of the Conférence Midi du Ministère des Ressources Naturelle et des Forêts, Québec, QC, Canada, 16 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Myelinated Retinal Nerve Fibers (MRNF). Guide de Terrain. Inventaire de Qualification des Plants Résineux Cultivés en Récipients; Gouvernement du Québec: Québec, QC, Canada, 2019; p. 114.
  3. Myelinated Retinal Nerve Fibers (MRNF). Monographie du Secteur des Plants Forestiers au Québec; Gouvernement du Québec: Québec, QC, Canada, 2016; p. 37.
  4. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Renaud, M.; Desjardins, P.; Veilleux, L. Root growth, plug cohesion, mineral nutrition, and carbohydrate content of (1+0) Picea mariana seedlings in response to a short-day treatment. Tree Plant. Notes 2013, 56, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  5. Girard, D.; Gagnon, J. Wireless network of electronic scales to monitor the substrate volumetric water content for managing irrigation of containerized seedlings produced in forest nurseries. Tree Plant. Notes 2016, 59, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Lambany, G.; Margolis, H.A.; Renaud, M.; Veilleux, L.; Bernier, P.Y. Growth, physiology and leachate losses in Picea glauca seedlings (1+0) grown in air-slit containers under different irrigation regimes. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 1968–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Labbé, L.; Margolis, H.A.; Stowe, D.C.; Blais, L.; Renaud, M. Spatial variability of substrate water content and growth of white spruce seedlings. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006, 70, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stowe, D.C.; Lamhamedi, M.S.; Carles, S.; Fecteau, B.; Margolis, H.A.; Renaud, M.; Bernier, P.Y. Managing irrigation to reduce nutrient leaching in containerized white spruce seedling production. New For. 2010, 40, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bernier, P.Y.; Gonzalez, A. Effects of the physical properties of Sphagnum peat on the nursery growth of containerized Picea mariana and Picea glauca seedlings. Scan. J. For. Res. 1995, 10, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bernier, P.Y.; Stewart, J.D.; Gonzalez, A. Effects of the physical properties of Sphagnum peat on water stress in containerized Picea mariana seedlings under simulated field conditions. Scan. J. For. Res. 1995, 10, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heiskanen, J. Favourable water and aeration conditions for growth media used in containerized tree seedling production: A review. Scan. J. For. Res. 1993, 8, 337–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McMillin, J.D.; Wagner, M.R. Effects of water stress on biomass partitioning of ponderosa pine seedlings during primary root growth and shoot growth periods. For. Sci. 1995, 41, 594–610. [Google Scholar]
  13. Heiskanen, J. Effect of peat-based two-component growth media on the growth of containerized Scots pine seedlings. Suo 1994, 45, 17–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bunt, A.C. Media and Mixes for Container-Grown Plants: A Manual on the Preparation and Use of Growing Media for Pot Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; p. 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Landis, T.D.; Tinus, R.W.; Barnett, J.P. The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Vol. 2: Containers and Growing Media; Handbook Agriculture No 674; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; 87p.
  16. Caron, J.; Rivière, L.M. Quality of Peat Substrates for Plants Grown in Containers. In Organic Soils and Peat Materials for Sustainable Agriculture; Parent, L.-E., Ilnicki, P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 67–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hammond, R.F. The Origin, Formation and Distribution of Peatland Resources. In Peat in Horticulture; Robinson, D.W., Lamb, J.G.D., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1975; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Allaire, S.; Caron, J.; Duchesne, I.; Parent, L.E.; Rioux, J.A. Air-filled porosity, gas relative diffusivity and tortuosity: Indices of Prunus x cistena growth in peat substrate. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1996, 121, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Folk, R.S.; Timmer, V.R.; Scarratt, J.B. Evaluating peat as a growing medium for jack pine seedlings. 1. Conventional quality indices. Can. J. For. Res. 1992, 22, 945–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boudreault, S.; Pepin, S.; Caron, J.; Lamhamedi, M.S.; Paiement, I. Substrate aeration properties and growth of containerized white spruce: A case study. Vadose Zone J. 2014, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nkongolo, N.V.; Caron, J. Bark particle sizes and the modification of the physical properties of peat substrates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1999, 79, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Caron, J.; Nkongolo, N.V. Assessing gas diffusion coefficients in growing media from in situ water flow and storage measurements. Vadose Zone J. 2004, 3, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Veilleux, L.; Renaud, M. Élaboration des seuils de tolérance au gel des plants d’épinette blanche (1+0) en pépinière forestière selon les régions écologiques du Québec. Gouvernement du Québec, ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs. Mémoire De Rech. For. 2005, 147, 50. [Google Scholar]
  24. Langlois, C.G.; Gagnon, J. A Global Approach to Mineral Nutrition Based on the Growth Needs of Seedlings Produced in Forest Tree Nurseries. In Plant Nutrition—From Genetic Engineering to Field Practice; Barrow, N.J., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Perth, Australia, 1993; pp. 303–306. [Google Scholar]
  25. Girard, D.; Gagnon, J.; Langlois, C.-G. PLANTEC: Un logiciel pour gérer la fertilisation des plants dans les pépinières forestières. Gouvernement du Québec, ministère des Ressources naturelles, Direction de la recherche forestière. Note Rech. For. 2001, 111, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambany, G.; Robidas, L.; Ballester, P. Measurement of soil water content in a peat-vermiculite medium using time domain reflectometry (TDR): A laboratory and field evaluation. Tree Plant. Notes 1997, 47, 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Renaud, M.; Desjardins, P.; Veilleux, L. Mise à l’échelle opérationnelle du traitement hâtif de jours courts sur la morpho-physiologie et l’insuffisance racinaire des plants d’épinette noire (1+0) produits en tunnel. Gouvernement du Québec, ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs. Mémoire Rech. For. 2009, 154, 28. [Google Scholar]
  28. Caron, J.; Parent, L.E.; Elrick, D.E.; Naasz, R. Physical Properties of Organic Soils and Growing Media: Water and Air Storage and Flow Dynamics. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis; Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 885–912. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kemper, W.D.; Roseneau, R.C. Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution. In Methods of Soil Analysis; Klute, A., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1986; pp. 425–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paquet, J.M.; Caron, J.; Banton, O. In-situ determination of the water desorption characteristics of peat substrates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1993, 73, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nemati, M.R.; Caron, J.; Banton, O.; Tardif, P. Determining air entry value in peat substrates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Caron, J.; Rivière, L.M.; Guillemain, G. Gas diffusion and air-filled porosity: Effect of some oversize fragments in growing media. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2005, 85, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Boodt, M.; Verdonck, O. The physical properties of the substrate in horticulture. Acta Hort. 1972, 26, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Milk, R.R.; Fonteno, W.C.; Larson, R.A. Hydrology of horticultural substrates: I. Mathematical models for moisture characteristics of horticultural container media. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1989, 114, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. King, J.A.; Smith, K.A. Gaseous diffusion through peat. J. Soil Sci. 1987, 38, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carter, M.R.; Gregorich, E.G. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd ed.; Canadian Society of Soil Science: Pinawa, MB, Canada; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; p. 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Walinga, I.; Van Der Lee, J.J.; Houba, V.J.G.; Van Vark, W.; Novosamsky, I. Plant Analysis Manual; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 1–247. [Google Scholar]
  38. Timmer, V.R.; Parton, W.J. Optimum nutrient levels in a container growing medium determined by saturated aqueous extract. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1984, 15, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs. Spécifications Techniques: Sphaigne de Tourbe; Gouvernement du Québec: Québec, QC, Canada, 2017; p. 9.
  40. Carlson, L.W. Conseils pour la Culture en Récipient des Semis de Conifères dans les Provinces des Prairies; Rapport d’Information NOR-X-214; Environnement Canada, Service Canadien des Forêts, Centre de Recherche Forestière du Nord: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1983; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
  41. Heiskanen, J. Irrigation regime affects water and aeration conditions in peat growth medium and the growth of containerized Scots pine seedlings. New For. 1995, 9, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Heiskanen, J. Water status of Sphagnum peat and a peat-perlite mixture in containers subjected to irrigation regimes. Hort Sci. 1995, 30, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wesseling, J.; Wijk, W.R. Land Drainage in Relation to Soil and Crops. In Drainage of Agricultural Lands; Luthin, J.N., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1957; pp. 461–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vomocil, J.A.; Flocker, W.J. Effect of soil compaction on storage and movement of soil air and water. Trans. Am. Soc. Agr. Eng. 1961, 4, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johnson, P. Horticultural and Agricultural Uses of Sawdust and Soil Amendments; Soil and Plant Laboratory: Anaheim, CA, USA, 1968; pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  46. Caron, J.; Xu, H.L.; Bernier, P.Y.; Duchesne, I.; Tardif, P. Water availability in three artificial substrates during Prunus × cistena growth: Variable threshold values. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1998, 123, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Caron, J.; Morel, P.; Rivière, L.-M.; Guillemain, G. Identifying appropriate methodology to diagnose aeration limitations with large peat and bark particles in growing media. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 90, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nkongolo, N.V.; Caron, J. Pore space organization and plant response in peat substrates: I. Prunus × cistena and Spiraea japonica. Sci. Res. Essays 2006, 1, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nkongolo, N.V.; Caron, J. Pore space organization and plant response in peat substrates: II. Dendrathemum morifolium Ramat. Sci. Res. Essays 2006, 1, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  50. Stowe, D.C.; Lamhamedi, M.S.; Margolis, H. Water relations, cuticular transpiration, and bud characteristics of air-slit containerized Picea glauca seedlings in response to controlled irrigation regime. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 1922–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. da Silva, F.F.; Wallach, R.; Chen, Y. Hydraulic properties of Sphagnum peat moss and tuff (scoria) and their potential effect on water availability. Plant Soil 1993, 154, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Heiskanen, J. Hydrological properties of container media based on sphagnum peat and their potential implications for availability of water to seedlings after outplanting. Scan. J. For. Res. 1999, 14, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Puustjarvi, V.; Robertson, R.A. Physical and Chemical Properties. In Peat in Horticulture; Robinson, D.W., Lamb, J.G.D., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1975; pp. 23–38. [Google Scholar]
  54. Heiskanen, J. Mechanical container filling alters texture and water retention of peat growth media. Hort Technol. 1994, 4, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Heiskanen, J. Physical properties of two-component growth media based on Sphagnum peat and their implications for plant-available water and aeration. Plant Soil 1995, 172, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Brix, H. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer source and application rates on foliar nitrogen concentration, photosynthesis, and growth of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 1981, 11, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gagnon, J.; Lamhamedi, M.S. Les Concentrations Foliaires en Azote Recommandées au Québec pour les Essences Résineuses Produites en Récipients Sont-Elles Adéquates? In Proceedings of the Production de Plants Forestiers au Québec: La Culture de L’innovation, Colloque de Transfert de Connaissances et de Savoir-Faire, Carrefour Forêt Innovations, Québec, QC, Canada, 4–6 October 2011; pp. 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Desjardins, P.; Renaud, M.; Veilleux, L. Techniques culturales de production pour améliorer la qualité morpho-physiologique des plants forestiers et la rentabilité des pépinières forestières au Québec. In Journée de Formation et de Transfert de Connaissances, D’expertises et de Savoir-Faire Auprès des Pépinières Forestières du Québec Membres de la Fédération Québécoise des Coopératives Forestières; Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère des Ressources Naturelles, Direction de la Recherche Forestière: Québec, QC, Canada, 2013; pp. 1–130. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Renaud, M.; Desjardins, P.; Veilleux, L. L’utilisation des toiles claires peut-elle augmenter la croissance des racines des plants d’épinette blanche (1+0) en pépinière forestière? In Production de Plants Forestiers au Québec: La Culture de L’innovation, Proceedings of the Colloque de Transfert de Connaissances et de Savoir-Faire, Carrefour Forêt Innovations, Québec, QC, Canada, 4–6 October 2011; Colas, F., Lamhamedi, M.S., Eds.; Gouvernement du Québec: Québec, QC, Canada, 2011; pp. 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ben-Noah, I.; Friedman, S.P. Review and evaluation of root respiration and of natural and agricultural processes of soil aeration. Vadose Zone J. 2018, 17, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fields, J.S.; Owen, J.S., Jr.; Stewart, R.D.; Heitman, J.L.; Caron, J. Modeling water fluxes through containerized soilless substrates using HYDRUS. Vadose Zone J. 2020, 19, e20031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Landl, M.; Schnepf, A.; Uteau, D.; Peth, S.; Athmann, M.; Kautz, T.; Perkons, U.; Vereecken, H.; Vanderborght, J. Modeling the impact of biopores on root growth and root water uptake. Vadose Zone J. 2019, 18, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Locations of private and government forest nurseries in the province of Québec (adapted from Lamhamedi et al. [23]).
Figure 1. Locations of private and government forest nurseries in the province of Québec (adapted from Lamhamedi et al. [23]).
Forests 14 00858 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the linear five-cavity container (aerial (A) and lateral (B) views) including a 10.5 cm long three-rod TDR probe inserted vertically within a cavity and a 36 cm long two-rod TDR probe with shorting diodes inserted horizontally across the five cavities at a height of 8 cm from the bottom of the container.
Figure 2. Schematic of the linear five-cavity container (aerial (A) and lateral (B) views) including a 10.5 cm long three-rod TDR probe inserted vertically within a cavity and a 36 cm long two-rod TDR probe with shorting diodes inserted horizontally across the five cavities at a height of 8 cm from the bottom of the container.
Forests 14 00858 g002
Figure 3. Mean weight diameter (MWD; above each stack column) and the proportion of peat particles with a diameter < 0.5 mm and between 0.5 and 1 mm, 1 and 4 mm and 4 and 20 mm in nursery substrates after potting.
Figure 3. Mean weight diameter (MWD; above each stack column) and the proportion of peat particles with a diameter < 0.5 mm and between 0.5 and 1 mm, 1 and 4 mm and 4 and 20 mm in nursery substrates after potting.
Forests 14 00858 g003
Figure 4. Water release curves of substrates from sampled forest nurseries after potting.
Figure 4. Water release curves of substrates from sampled forest nurseries after potting.
Forests 14 00858 g004
Figure 5. Relationship between shoot dry weight of white spruce seedlings (1+0) and the air-filled porosity at container capacity of substrates at the end of the growing season (n = 24).
Figure 5. Relationship between shoot dry weight of white spruce seedlings (1+0) and the air-filled porosity at container capacity of substrates at the end of the growing season (n = 24).
Forests 14 00858 g005
Figure 6. Relationship between root dry weight of white spruce seedlings (1+0) and bulk density of substrates at the end of the growing season (n = 24).
Figure 6. Relationship between root dry weight of white spruce seedlings (1+0) and bulk density of substrates at the end of the growing season (n = 24).
Forests 14 00858 g006
Table 1. Composition, chemical properties, and initial fertility of substrates after potting (n = 5), and quantities of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) applied per seedling of white spruce (1+0) during the growing season in sampled forest nurseries.
Table 1. Composition, chemical properties, and initial fertility of substrates after potting (n = 5), and quantities of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) applied per seedling of white spruce (1+0) during the growing season in sampled forest nurseries.
No. 1PeatVermi 2PerlitepHEC 3CECeff 4Initial Fertility
(µg 100 cm−3)
Applied Fertilizer
(mg Plant−1)
(%, v v−1) (mS m−1)(meq L−1)
N_NH4N_NO2,3PKCaMgNtotalPK
1752504.20116.726.3142165742786
2752503.81209.022.41361860735341721
3802004.10126.021.632551525211062438
4861504.14119.726.314191737419831930
5752504.20166.032.228290901239822749
6802004.17213.333.9171053157155511226
7604004.00161.324.418774042651921
882993.99143.625.0299819529481331
1 Forest nursery number. 2 Vermi = vermiculite. 3 EC = electrical conductivity. 4 CECeff = effective cation exchange capacity.
Table 2. Physical properties of substrates from eight forest nurseries after potting.
Table 2. Physical properties of substrates from eight forest nurseries after potting.
No. 1KsρbθtθaEAWAWγDs D0−1
(cm s−1)(g cm−3)(cm3 cm−3)(cm3 cm−3)(cm3 cm−3)(cm3 cm−3)(m m−1)(m2 s−1 m−2 s)
10.02 e0.095 ab0.943 bc0.04 d0.26 a0.38 bc0.093 a0.0041 a
20.04 d0.089 c0.945 bc0.11 bcd0.29 a0.44 ab0.066 a0.0070 a
30.09 bc0.076 d0.954 a0.17 a0.28 a0.40 a0.096 a0.0171 a
40.08 bc0.094 ab0.943 bc0.09 c0.34 a0.41 a0.108 a0.0088 a
50.03 e0.105 a0.938 d0.11 bc0.26 a0.39 c0.105 a0.0119 a
60.11 a0.099 a0.942 bc0.08 cd0.30 a0.46 a0.118 a0.0091 a
70.05 d0.088 c0.945 b0.14 ab0.28 a0.40 a0.075 a0.0104 a
80.05 cd0.092 bc0.944 bc0.08 cd0.33 a0.46 a0.081 a0.0061 a
Mean0.060.0910.9440.110.310.420.0870.0090
SD0.010.0020.0010.020.040.020.0200.0100
1 No. = forest nursery number, Ks = saturated hydraulic conductivity, ρb = bulk density, θt = total porosity, θa = air-filled porosity at container capacity, EAW = easily available water content, AW = available water content, γ = pore effectiveness coefficient and Ds D0−1 = relative gas diffusivity. SD = standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05 according to a protected LSD test.
Table 3. Morphological variables of white spruce seedlings (1+0) and nutrient concentration of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in shoot tissues (n = 3).
Table 3. Morphological variables of white spruce seedlings (1+0) and nutrient concentration of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in shoot tissues (n = 3).
No. 1Shoot DWRoot DWHDH/DNPKCaMg
(mg)(mg)(cm)(mm)(cm mm−1)(g kg−1)(g kg−1)(g kg−1)(g kg−1)(g kg−1)
11244 a520 a9.3 b2.9 b3.2 e,f26.8 a,b3.1 b,c,d5.5 d,e1.4 c1.3 d
21190 a,b552 a10.0 b3.4 a3.0 f24.1 b,c3.2 b6.7 c,d1.9 a,b1.8 a
3997 b,c370 b9.9 b2.7 b3.7 d,e23.1 b,c,d2.6 c,d5.4 e1.7 b1.5 b,c,d
4896 c,d355 b9.9 b2.4 c4.2 c23.6 b,c,d2.6 c,d8.1 b1.7 b1.7 a,b
5812 c,d371 b12.9 a2.4 c5.3 a21.3 c,d3.1 b,c18.6 a2.1 a1.7 a,b,c
6734 d,e506 a8.2 c2.3 c3.6 d,e19.9 d2.6 d6.4 b,c1.3 c1.4 c,d
7511 e,f274 b,c6.9 d1.8 d3.8 c,d30.7 a4.2 a7.2 c,d,e2.1 a1.9 a
8277 f177 c6.4 d1.4 e4.7 b25.1 b,c3.4 b6.2 c,d,e1.6 b1.5 b,c,d
1 No. = forest nursery number, DW = dry weight, H = seedling height, D = stem diameter, H/D = height–diameter ratio. Forest nurseries were sorted from 1 to 8 in tables and figures based on shoot dry weight of white spruce seedlings (1+0) at the end of the growing season. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05 according to a protected LSD test.
Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficients 1 between morphological variables and physical and chemical properties of forest nursery substrates after potting, quantities of nitrogen (Ntotal), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) applied per seedling of white spruce (1+0) during the growing season and physical properties determined at the end of the growing season.
Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficients 1 between morphological variables and physical and chemical properties of forest nursery substrates after potting, quantities of nitrogen (Ntotal), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) applied per seedling of white spruce (1+0) during the growing season and physical properties determined at the end of the growing season.
Shoot DW 2Root DWHDH/D
Physical properties after potting
Ks0.020.28−0.180.17−0.41
ρb−0.030.280.310.000.34
θt0.09−0.19−0.240.06−0.35
θa−0.18−0.390.11−0.100.17
MWD−0.62−0.360.07−0.580.77
<0.5 mm0.300.06−0.290.17−0.50
1_4 mm−0.240.060.10−0.160.24
EAW−0.250.11−0.44−0.08−0.27
AW−0.45−0.08−0.50−0.30−0.05
γ0.340.660.350.47−0.21
Ds D0−10.02−0.100.330.120.12
Chemical properties after potting
pH−0.11−0.07−0.30−0.32−0.06
CE−0.30−0.03−0.39−0.10−0.23
CECeff−0.41−0.08−0.47−0.45−0.03
NH4−0.13−0.060.32−0.090.37
NO2–3−0.20−0.440.14−0.230.40
P−0.110.22−0.32−0.07−0.35
K−0.27−0.06−0.60−0.23−0.40
Ca−0.320.02−0.43−0.23−0.24
Mg0.320.610.300.41−0.13
Applied fertilizer
Ntotal0.720.630.520.80 *−0.81 *
P0.84 *0.560.82 *0.86 *−0.56
K0.390.370.270.52−0.43
Physical properties at end of growing season
Ks_1−0.53 **−0.29−0.09−0.42 *0.41 *
ρb_10.330.63 **0.280.35−0.14
θa_1−0.53 **−0.37−0.28−0.51 *0.23
1 The smallest significant coefficient was 0.75 for variables measured after potting (p < 0.05; n = 8) and 0.40 for physical properties measured after one growing season (p < 0.05; n = 24). * Significant at p < 0.05, ** Significant at p < 0.01. 2 DW = dry weight, H = seedling height, D = root collar diameter and H/D = height–diameter ratio. Ks = saturated hydraulic conductivity, ρb = bulk density, θt = total porosity, θa = air-filled porosity at container capacity, MWD = mean weight diameter, <0.5 mm = fraction of peat particles with a diameter < 0.5 mm, 1–4 mm = proportion of peat particles with a diameter between 1 and 4 mm, EAW = easily available water content, AW = available water content, γ = pore effectiveness coefficient, Ds D0−1 = relative gas diffusivity, EC = electrical conductivity and CECeff = effective cation exchange capacity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boudreault, S.; Caron, J.; Lamhamedi, M.S.; Pepin, S. Comparison of Hydraulic and Aeration Properties of Peat Substrates Used to Produce Containerized White Spruce Seedlings (1+0) in Forest Nurseries. Forests 2023, 14, 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040858

AMA Style

Boudreault S, Caron J, Lamhamedi MS, Pepin S. Comparison of Hydraulic and Aeration Properties of Peat Substrates Used to Produce Containerized White Spruce Seedlings (1+0) in Forest Nurseries. Forests. 2023; 14(4):858. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boudreault, Simon, Jean Caron, Mohammed S. Lamhamedi, and Steeve Pepin. 2023. "Comparison of Hydraulic and Aeration Properties of Peat Substrates Used to Produce Containerized White Spruce Seedlings (1+0) in Forest Nurseries" Forests 14, no. 4: 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040858

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop