Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Analysis of Chemical Hydrogen Storage: Energetics of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier Systems Based on Methyl-Substituted Indoles
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Aging Kinetics of a Flame-Resistant AZ91D-1.5%Ca Magnesium Alloy Processed with Ultrasonic Vibration
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Flexural Performance of Aluminum Alloy Gusset Joints Subjected to Bending Moment and Shear Force
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study on Microstructural Characterization of Thick High Strength Low Alloy Steel Weld by Arc Welding and Laser Welding
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 7
10.3390/ma16072922
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux High-Entropy Alloy with Excellent Corrosion Resistance

by
Zhen Peng
1,*,
Baowei Li
1,
Zaibin Luo
1,
Xuefei Chen
1,
Yao Tang
2,
Guannan Yang
3,* and
Pan Gong
4
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
China Steel Development Research Institute, No.95 Longfusi Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100009, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Precision Electronic Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1037 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(7), 2922; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072922
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Metallurgy of Metals and Alloys)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lightweight high-entropy alloys (HEAs) are a new class of low-density, high strength-to-weight ratio metallic structural material. Understanding their corrosion behavior is crucial for designing microstructures for their practical applications. This work investigates the electrochemical corrosion behavior of lightweight HEAs AlCrTiV0.5Cux (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) in a 0.6 M NaCl solution. These HEAs were produced by vacuum arc melting. In contrast to 304L stainless steel, all of the alloys exhibited lower current density levels caused by self-corrosion, with AlCrTiV0.5 demonstrating the highest corrosion resistance (0.131 μA/cm2). Corrosion resistance decreased along with the content of copper because copper segregation accelerated local corrosion throughout the alloy.

1. Introduction

High-entropy alloys, also known as HEAs, are generally composed of five or more elements in equimolar or near-equimolar ratios. These alloys are stable in a disordered solid solution state owing to a high mixing entropy [1,2]. Over the past twenty years, there has been an explosion of interest in a novel concept of alloy design that allows for the creation of materials with superior mechanical or physical properties. These properties include high yield strengths, ductility, and fracture toughness, in addition to superior high-temperature oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance. As a result of these features, HEAs have found applications in a huge range of different fields [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
However, despite the application potential being high, the high density of many HEAs greatly inhibits the actual deployment of these applications. For example, the density of a CoCrFeNiMn HEA is 8.1 g/cm3, while the density of refractory high-enthalpy alloys (HEAs) is more than 10 g/cm3. Both of these HEAs have a mass density that is higher than that of steel, which has a density of 7.9 g per cubic centimeter. For the purpose of increasing the effectiveness of systems that convert energy, it is necessary to reduce the weight. This necessitates the use of building and engineering materials that have a low density [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Recent studies have shown a significant interest in the development of high-entropy alloys that are also lightweight. While making lightweight HEAs, it is common practice to incorporate significant amounts of light components such as aluminium, titanium, magnesium, and lithium. The incorporation of Al (also for the purpose of alloy strengthening) changes the phase composition and microstructure of HEAs to produce a multiphase microstructure that can include FCC, BCC, and B2 structures [21,22], and the incorporation of Ti can easily lead to the production of secondary phases. Single-phase equiatomic AlCrTiV HEA has a low density of 5.06 g/cm3 and a hardness of 498 HV. The AlCrTiV quaternary system was selected by Huang et al. [23], who further increased the material’s hardness by including lightweight microalloying components. Microalloyed AlCrTiV alloys have a maximum hardness of 710 HV and a density of around 4.5 g per cubic centimeter. In addition to their mechanical advantages, high-performance additives provide excellent resistance to corrosion, which is an important factor in the application of engineering and structural materials.
The microstructure, alloying components, and production procedure of lightweight HEAs are the primary factors that decide the corrosion behavior in general. Tseng and colleagues [24] have developed a lightweight HEA material with the formula Al20Be20Fe10Si15Ti35 that has a low density of 3.91 g/cm3 and a high hardness of 911 HV. At temperatures of 700 and 900 °C, the alloy had an oxidation resistance that was remarkable and was much superior to that of Ti6Al4V. Ji et al. [25] conducted a study in which they manufactured a low-cost Al35Mg30-xZn30Cu5Six HEA that had a low density. They found that the resistance of as-cast alloys to corrosion in a solution containing 3.5 wt% NaCl may be improved by increasing the Si/Mg ratio. They also found that corrosion occurred primarily at the grain boundaries and gradually spread into the eutectic and intermetallic phases that included magnesium. This was a new finding for them. According to the findings of Qiu et al. [26], AlTiVCr HEA exhibited remarkable resistance to corrosion in 0.6 M NaCl, much higher than that of pure Al and 304SS.
It is possible to improve the qualities of a material by designing the formation of secondary phases and intermetallic phases inside the substance. The same strategy for strengthening materials, namely alloying, was used in the development of HEAs. The addition of Cu to HEAs is a practical method that may be used to achieve improved properties [15,27]. Yet, when exposed to aqueous environments, the heterogeneous microstructures of HEAs have the potential to cause localized corrosion. It is very necessary to investigate the impact that Cu concentration has on the corrosion resistance of HEAs in order to guarantee the consistency of industrial applications. In this study, lightweight HEAs made of AlCrTiV0.5Cux were created by vacuum arc melting. Their electrochemical corrosion behavior in 0.6 M NaCl solution, composition homogeneity, and multi-scale microstructure were investigated.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Preparation

The AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs were manufactured in a graphite crucible by the process of vacuum arc melting under the protection of an Ar atmosphere. We picked raw minerals that had an extremely high level of purity, such as aluminum (99.5%), chromium (99.95%), titanium (99.95%), vanadium (99.95%), and copper (99.95%). Each sample was remelted at least six times in an ingot to ensure that the chemical composition remained consistent throughout the melting process and to decrease the amount of oxidation that occurred. A specimen measuring 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm was extracted from the selected area in the middle of the ingot by using a wire cutter that was coupled to an electric discharge machine. Every sample was given a grit-2000 grinding on SiC sandpaper before being subjected to ultrasonic cleaning in ethanol.

2.2. Microstructural Characterization

In order to determine the phase structure of the samples, a Rigaku SMARTLAB9 X-ray diffractometer was used with Cu-Kα radiation across a range of 10° to 90° and at a scanning rate of 10°/min. The microstructure and corrosion morphologies were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), respectively.

2.3. Electrochemical Corrosion Measurements

Electrochemical corrosion tests were carried out at a temperature of 25 °C in 0.6 M NaCl in the presence of air. In order to carry out these measurements, a diamond polishing paste with particles of 1.5 μm in size was applied to specimens that had a cross-sectional area of 0.25 cm2. Using a CHI760 electrochemical workstation that was supplied with a standard three-electrode setup, polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were measured. The corroded samples were used as working electrodes, a AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode, and a sheet of platinum was used as the counter electrode in this experiment. The open circuit potential (OCP) was monitored for a period of thirty minutes prior to the EIS and polarization studies in order to guarantee a consistent potential for the duration of the tests. The EIS measurements were collected with a potential amplitude of 5 mV and with frequencies ranging from 100 kHz to 10 MHz. Potentiodynamic polarization curves were obtained with a scan rate of 3 mV/s, with a starting potential of −0.9 VSHE and an ending potential of 1.1 VSHE. In order to guarantee the accuracy of the results, more than three measurements were obtained for each different test situation. When the potentiodynamic polarization studies were finished, the samples were wiped clean with ethanol and then left to dry in the air. When the electrochemical tests were completed, the surface morphology of the samples was analyzed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FEI Nova Nano450) (FESEM).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure Characterization

Cu has a positive binary enthalpy of mixing and relatively high valence electron concentration (VEC) with other constitutional elements. Figure 1 shows that the mixing enthalpy, VE, and mixing entropy ΔSmix of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs increased with the increase in Cu content, while the atomic size difference δ decreased with Cu addition. Hence, the microstructure and phase stability of AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs may vary with the composition. Cu tends to segregate out of the matrix due to a positive binary enthalpy of mixing of Cu with other constitutional elements. The AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs have a relatively large atomic size difference. Based on the solid-solution phase formation rules of high entropy alloys [28], there are probably ordered phases such as intermetallic compounds in the matrix. According to the VEC criterion [29], the phase composition of AlCrTiV0.5 is mainly BCC phase. The content of FCC phase increases with the addition of Cu, and AlCrTiV0.5Cu is mainly FCC phase. Figure 2 shows XRD patterns of AlCrTiV0.5Cux samples. In summary, with the addition of Cu, the phase composition of AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs may gradually change from BCC phase to FCC phase, and there may be intermetallic compounds. The segregation of Cu between grains increases with the copper content.
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs. AlCrTiV0.5 exhibits a typical equiaxed crystal structure with uniform composition and without obvious precipitation phases. With the addition of Cu, the alloys AlCrTiV0.5Cu0.2, AlCrTiV0.5Cu0.4, AlCrTiV0.5Cu0.6, and AlCrTiV0.5Cu0.8 show an equiaxed dendritic structure with more obvious grain boundaries. Moreover, the grain size gradually decreased with increasing Cu content, When the Cu content is further increased, AlCrTiV0.5Cu shows a non-equiaxial dendritic structure with a further reduction in grain size. We presented the X-ray diffraction pattern of lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs in a previous work [15].
Further in-depth research on the elemental composition and dispersion of lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs was conducted. The EDS maps of an enlarged portion of the samples are shown in Figure 4 (which shows both the grains and grain borders). The findings indicate that the components are dispersed throughout the samples in an even manner on a microscopic scale. Since Cu is missing, there is no segregation of the elements, and they are all distributed in the same manner. Nevertheless, the results of the XRD investigation reveal that the segregation gets more prominent with increasing Cu concentration. This results in the development of an Al-Ti-Cu-rich HCP phase as well as a V-Cr-rich FCC phase. The inclusion of copper is largely responsible for this kind of alloy having the dendritic structure that is so distinctive in other alloys of this type.

3.2. Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior in NaCl solution

The potentiodynamic polarization curves of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs in 0.6 M NaCl solution are shown in Figure 5 and the results of the calculations used to determine the electrochemical corrosion parameters are shown in Table 1. The open-circuit potential of a material is referred to as its corrosion potential, or Ecorr. It is possible to determine the corrosion rates of materials by utilizing the corrosion current density (Icorr). In order to calculate Icorr from the Tafel diagram, the linear portion of the polarization curve located close to Ecorr. is extrapolated. It is clear from both the fitting parameters and the potentiodynamic polarization curves of the alloys that, as the concentration of copper increases, the corrosion current density (Icorr) also increases, but the resistance to corrosion decreases. AlCrTiV0.5 (0.131 A/cm2) had the lowest value of Icorr and the maximum corrosion resistance out of the six alloys that were tested. This is because the addition of Cu to the alloy will cause segregation at the grain boundaries. Dendrites may be produced by combining a Cu-depleted region with a Cu-rich region. If there is a significant potential difference between the two phases, galvanic coupling can result in corrosion, with the interdendritic area corroding first and increasing the local corrosion of the alloy [30,31]. If there is a significant potential difference between the two phases, galvanic coupling can also result in corrosion. Because of this, the corrosion resistance of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs in NaCl solution gradually decreases as the content of Cu increases.
Figure 6 displays the Nyquist, Bode, and phase-angle charts of the lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs at a range of temperatures corresponding to varied operating conditions. Z-view was used in order to evaluate the fitted parameters, and Figure 6 presents the equivalent circuit that was produced as a consequence.
A larger semicircle radius indicates that the interface has a higher resistance for the charge transfer and is a more protective passive film [32,33,34,35]. Figure 6a depicts the Nyquist plot, and it has the shape of an incomplete semicircle, which indicates that the charge transfer process is in control of the corrosion process. In the high-frequency range, incomplete capacitive arcs are shown by the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs. This is evidenced by Figure 6a, which makes it abundantly clear that the incomplete capacitance arcs are caused by charge transfer at inhomogeneous surfaces. As the concentration of copper in the alloy increases, its resistance to corrosion diminishes, and the radius of the capacitive semicircle becomes smaller.
Figure 6b,c show the Bode and phase angle charts of the alloys’ electrochemical corrosion, respectively. As can be seen, the impedance modulus and phase-angle change with frequency. The Bode plot shown in Figure 6b demonstrates that the passive films have a pseudocapacitive character since the slopes are less than −1 and the phase angle is smaller than −90°. In Figure 6c, the phase angle is getting close to 90°, and the value of the impedance modulus is linear from 1 Hz all the way up to 103 Hz. The phase angle of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux alloys decreases from 103 Hz, achieves a tiny value at 104 Hz, and then continues to rise and reaches a high value at 105 Hz. A low value is reached again at 104 Hz, and a high value again at 105 Hz.
The data on the impedance are used in the production of an equivalent electric circuit (EEC) (shown in Figure 7). R1 represents the resistance of the solution in the EEC model, R2 represents the resistance of the passivated layer, and R3 represents the charge transfer resistance of the limited corrosion zone. In the zone that has been passivated, the capacitance is represented by CPE1, and in the zone that has been partly corroded, it is represented by CPE2. A constant phase-angle element, also known as a CPE, is used in place of a traditional capacitor so that flaws in capacitive components, such as surface inhomogeneities, may be taken into consideration. If the value of the charge transfer resistance, or R3, is lowered, then a greater number of electrons and ions will be able to flow through the passivation layer created by the alloy, which will result in a reduction in the alloy’s resistance to corrosion [36,37,38,39].
Table 2 presents some example parameters for EEC fitting that were generated while operating under OCP conditions. When the value of CPE1-P is close to 0.9, this indicates that the properties of the component are between those of a typical capacitor and those of a Warburg impedance [40,41,42,43,44]. The charge transfer resistance, denoted by R3, will decrease in proportion to the amount of copper that is present. We discover that AlCrTiV0.5 has a high charge transfer resistance of 437,920 Ω·cm2 (and strong corrosion resistance in 0.6 M NaCl solution), while AlCrTiV0.5Cu possesses the lowest charge transfer resistance of 31,276 Ω·cm2. According to the data presented above, the corrosion process of AlCrTiV0.5Cux HEAs is regulated not only by the transfer of charge but also by the regulation of diffusion.

3.3. Corrosion Morphology Analysis

Figure 8 depicts the surface morphology of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs after they were subjected to polarization tests in a solution containing 0.6 M NaCl. The corrosion has reached such an advanced stage that the surfaces are severely exfoliated and are in no way uniform. The fact that there are just a few pits on the surface is evidence of limited corrosion; hence, the samples were not fully ruined. The surface roughness was not on the nanoscale scale in the regions of the material that did not include corrosion pits.
Figure 8a depicts the surface morphology of the lightweight AlCrTiV0.5 HEA, which demonstrates that the surface is smooth and flat after corrosion and does not exhibit any obvious corrosion pits. The prior results that the AlCrTiV0.5 alloy exhibited greater corrosion resistance than the other five HEAs are supported by these new data, which are consistent with those findings. AlCrTiV0.5 lightweight HEA has high resistance to corrosion as a result of its uniform composition, single BCC phase structure, and lack of composition segregation at grain boundaries. These characteristics contribute to the material’s outstanding uniformity. When AlCrTiV0.5Cux is corroded (where x may be any of the values 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, or 1.0), substantial aggregation of Cu elements occurs in the dendritic intergranular region (see Figure 8), and enormous corrosion pits also develop. When there is a higher percentage of copper in the alloy, the surface corrosion of the alloy becomes worse.
In general, the AlCrTiV0.5 lightweight HEAs show good corrosion resistance in the testing environment. Increased Cu content enhanced Cu segregation, which could induce localized corrosion susceptibility in Cu-added HEAs. The addition of Cu also increases the mixing entropy of the system, thus the effect of the high-entropy effect on the corrosion resistance of the alloys should be considered. The corrosion behavior also seemed to relate to the sluggish diffusion. Dissolution of Cu was dominant in the competitive process of formation of the passive film. Sluggish diffusion can inhibit the migration of Cu, reduce the defects in the passive film, and inhibit the formation of cation vacancies, thereby improving corrosion behavior [35]. In this study, due to the segregation of Cu and Cu-rich areas exposed to the surface, the effect of slow diffusion was not obvious. Only in AlCrTiV0.5Cu0.2 HEA, in which the segregation of Cu structure was lower, was the corrosion resistance reduced slowly. When the content of Cu is higher and the degree of segregation is greater, the high-entropy effect has little effect, and the corrosion resistance is significantly reduced.

4. Conclusions

(1)
In a solution of 0.6 M NaCl, the electrochemical behavior of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs changes depending on the proportion of Cu. While AlCrTiV0.5 has the best corrosion resistance and the lowest self-corrosion current density at 0.131 μA/cm2, AlCrTiV0.5Cu has the greatest self-corrosion current density at 2.778 μA/cm2 and the poorest corrosion resistance. AlCrTiV0.5 has the lowest self-corrosion current density and the best corrosion resistance.
(2)
When Cu is added to the HEAs, it is polarised between the dendrites, forming a Cu-rich phase. A higher Cu content leads to more pronounced polarization. The segregation of Cu lead to a large potential difference between the Cu-rich and Cu-poor phases that formed between and within the dendrites, making the area between the dendrites more susceptible to galvanic coupling corrosion.

Author Contributions

Z.P. organized the work, supervised the research progress, and wrote the manuscript. B.L.; Z.L. and Y.T. conducted the sample preparation, performed the microstructural analysis. X.C., G.Y. and P.G. revised the manuscript, and contributed to the discussion. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52271147, and No. 12261160364) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan-Basic Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this work are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yeh, J.W.; Chen, S.K.; Lin, S.J.; Gan, J.Y.; Chin, T.S.; Shun, T.T.; Tsau, C.H.; Chang, S.Y. Nanostructured High-Entropy Alloys with Multiple Principal Elements: Novel Alloy Design Concepts and Outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cantor, B.; Chang, I.T.H.; Knight, P.; Vincent, A.J.B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375–377, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miracle, D.B.; Senkov, O.N. A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 2017, 122, 448–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Otto, F.; Dlouhý, A.; Somsen, C.; Bei, H.; Eggeler, G.; George, E.P. The influences of temperature and microstructure on the tensile properties of a CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 5743–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Niu, S.Z.; Kou, H.C.; Wang, J.; Li, J.S. Improved tensile properties of Al0.5CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy by tailoring microstructures. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lei, Z.F.; Liu, X.J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Jiang, S.; Wang, S.D.; Hui, X.D.; Wu, Y.D.; Gault, B.; Kontis, P.; et al. Enhanced strength and ductility in a high-entropy alloy via ordered oxygen complexes. Nature 2018, 563, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lu, Z.P.; Wang, H.; Chen, M.W.; Baker, I.; Yeh, J.W.; Liu, C.T.; Nieh, T.G. An assessment on the future development of high-entropy alloys: Summary from a recent workshop. Intermetallics 2015, 66, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bhalla, S.; Melnekoff, D.T.; Aleman, A.; Leshchenko, V.; Restrepo, P.; Keats, J.; Onel, K.; Sawyer, J.R.; Madduri, D.; Richter, J.; et al. Patient similarity network of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma identifies patient subgroups with distinct genetic features and clinical implications. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg9551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Luan, H.W.; Zhang, X.; Ding, H.Y.; Zhang, F.; Luan, J.H.; Jiao, Z.B.; Yang, Y.C.; Bu, H.T.; Wang, R.; Gu, J.L.; et al. High-entropy induced a glass-to-glass transition in a metallic glass. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Peng, Z.; Sun, J.; Luan, H.W.; Chen, N.; Yao, K.F. Effect of Mo on the high temperature oxidation behavior of Al19Fe20-xCo20-xNi41Mo2x high entropy alloys. Intermetallics 2023, 155, 107845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Zuo, T.T.; Tang, Z.; Gao, M.C.; Dahmen, K.A.; Liaw, P.K.; Lu, Z.P. Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 61, 1–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, X.F.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, Z.Y.; Zhu, M.L.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, L.L.; Xue, Q.; Yuan, F.P.; Zhu, J.; et al. Direct observation of chemical short-range order in a medium-entropy alloy. Nature 2021, 592, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. George, E.P.; Raabe, D.; Ritchie, R.O. High-entropy alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 515–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qiu, Y.; Hu, Y.J.; Taylor, A.; Styles, M.J.; Marceau, R.K.W.; Ceguerra, A.V.; Gibson, M.A.; Liu, Z.K.; Fraser, H.L.; Birbilis, N. A lightweight single-phase AlTiVCr compositionally complex alloy. Acta Mater. 2017, 123, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Peng, Z.; Luo, Z.B.; Li, B.W.; Li, J.F.; Luan, H.W.; Gu, J.L.; Wu, Y.; Yao, K.F. Microstructure and mechanical properties of lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux high-entropy alloys. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 2016–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stepanov, N.D.; Yurchenko, N.Y.; Skibin, D.V.; Tikhonovsky, M.A.; Salishchev, G.A. Structure and mechanical properties of the AlCrxNbTiV (x = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5) high entropy alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 652, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Senkov, O.N.; Senkova, S.V.; Miracle, D.B.; Woodward, C. Mechanical properties of low-density, refractory multi-principal element alloys of the Cr–Nb–Ti–V–Zr system. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 565, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Youssef, K.M.; Zaddach, A.J.; Niu, C.; Irving, D.L.; Koch, C.C. A Novel Low-Density, High-Hardness, High-entropy Alloy with Close-packed Single-phase Nanocrystalline Structures. Mater. Res. Lett. 2015, 3, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Stepanov, N.D.; Shaysultanov, D.G.; Salishchev, G.A.; Tikhonovsky, M.A. Structure and mechanical properties of a light-weight AlNbTiV high entropy alloy. Mater. Lett. 2015, 142, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, Y.F.; Jia, Y.D.; Wu, S.W.; Ma, X.D.; Wang, G. Novel Ultralight-Weight Complex Concentrated Alloys with High Strength. Materials 2019, 12, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sun, Z.J.; Tan, X.P.; Wang, C.C.; Descoins, M.; Mangelinck, D.; Tor, S.B.; Jägle, E.A.; Zaefferer, S.; Raabe, D. Reducing hot tearing by grain boundary segregation engineering in additive manufacturing: Example of an AlxCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 2021, 204, 116505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qiu, Y.; Thomas, S.; Fabijanic, D.; Barlow, A.J.; Fraser, H.L.; Birbilis, N. Microstructural evolution, electrochemical and corrosion properties of AlxCoCrFeNiTiy high entropy alloys. Mater. Des. 2019, 170, 107698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, X.; Miao, J.; Luo, A.A. Lightweight AlCrTiV high-entropy alloys with dual-phase microstructure via microalloying. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 54, 2271–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tseng, K.; Yang, Y.; Juan, C.; Chin, T.; Tsai, C.; Yeh, J. A light-weight high-entropy alloy Al20Be20Fe10Si15Ti. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2018, 61, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ji, C.W.; Ma, A.B.; Jiang, J.H. Mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of novel Al-Mg-Zn-Cu-Si lightweight high entropy alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 900, 163508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qiu, Y.; Thomas, S.; Gibson, M.A.; Fraser, H.L.; Pohl, K.; Birblis, N. Microstructure and corrosion properties of the low-density single-phase compositionally complex alloy AlTiVCr. Corros. Sci. 2018, 133, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, Y.; Feng, K.; Liu, J.J.; Cheng, J.; Qiao, Z.H.; Yang, J.; Li, J.S.; Liu, W.M. Effects of Ti and Cu on the Microstructure Evolution of AlCoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloy During Heat Treatment. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 2020, 33, 1077–1090. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.J.; Lin, J.P.; Chen, G.L.; Liaw, P.K. Solid-Solution Phase Formation Rules for Multi-component Alloys. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2008, 10, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, S.; Ng, C.; Lu, J.; Liu, C.T. Effect of valence electron concentration on stability of fcc or bcc phase in high entropy alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 103505. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shi, Y.Z.; Yang, B.; Xie, X.; Brechtl, J.; Dahmen, K.A.; Liaw, P.K. Corrosion of Al xCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys: Al-content and potential scan-rate dependent pitting behavior. Corros. Sci. 2017, 119, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, C.W.; Lu, Y.S.; Lai, Z.H.; Yen, H.W.; Lee, Y.L. Comparative corrosion behavior of Fe50Mn30Co10Cr10 dual-phase high-entropy alloy and CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 842, 155824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Muangtong, P.; Rodchanarowan, A.; Chaysuwan, D.; Chanlek, N.; Goodall, R. The corrosion behaviour of CoCrFeNi-x (x = Cu, Al, Sn) high entropy alloy systems in chloride solution. Corros. Sci. 2020, 172, 108740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, Z.L.; Zhang, H.; Du, X.J.; He, Y.Z.; Luo, H.; Song, G.S.; Mao, L.; Zhou, T.W.; Wang, L.L. Corrosion resistance enhancement of CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy fabricated by additive manufacturing. Corros. Sci. 2020, 177, 108954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Luo, H.; Li, Z.M.; Mingers, A.M.; Raabe, D. Corrosion behavior of an equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy compared with 304 stainless steel in sulfuric acid solution. Corros. Sci. 2018, 134, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gong, P.; Wang, D.L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Shirvan, Z.J.; Yao, K.F.; Wang, X.Y. Corrosion behavior of TiZrHfBeCu(Ni) high-entropy bulk metallic glasses in 3.5 wt. % NaCl. NPJ Mater. Degrad. 2022, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pao, L.; Muto, I.; Sugawara, Y. Pitting at inclusions of the equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi alloy and improving corrosion resistance by potentiodynamic polarization in H2SO. Corros. Sci. 2021, 191, 109748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hsu, K.M.; Chen, S.H.; Lin, C.S. Microstructure and corrosion behavior of FeCrNiCoMnx (x = 1.0, 0.6, 0.3, 0) high entropy alloys in 0.5 M H2SO. Corros. Sci. 2021, 190, 109694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, Y.Z.; Yang, B.; Liaw, P.K. Corrosion-Resistant High-Entropy Alloys: A Review. Metals 2017, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chou, Y.L.; Yeh, J.W.; Shih, H.C. The effect of molybdenum on the corrosion behaviour of the high-entropy alloys Co1.5CrFeNi1.5Ti0.5Mox in aqueous environments. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 2571–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Qiu, Y.; Thomas, S.; Gibson, M.A.; Fraser, H.L.; Birbilis, N. Corrosion of high entropy alloys. Npj Mater. Degrad. 2017, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hermas, A.A.; Morad, M.S. A comparative study on the corrosion behaviour of 304 austenitic stainless steel in sulfamic and sulfuric acid solutions. Corros. Sci. 2008, 50, 2710–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kocijan, A.; Merl, D.K.; Jenko, M. The corrosion behaviour of austenitic and duplex stainless steels in artificial saliva with the addition of fluoride. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 776–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Y.; Jin, J.S.; Zhang, M.; Liu, F.M.; Wang, X.Y.; Gong, P.; Tang, X.F. Influence of plastic deformation on the corrosion behavior of CrCoFeMnNi high entropy alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 891, 161822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yao, Y.H.; Jin, Y.H.; Gao, W.; Liang, X.Y.; Chen, J.; Zhu, S.D. Corrosion Behavior of AlFeCrCoNiZrx High-Entropy Alloys in 0.5 M Sulfuric Acid Solution. Metals 2021, 11, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 02922 g001 550
Figure 1. Variation in (a)VEC; (b) mixing enthalpy ΔHmix; (c) mixing entropy ΔSmix; (d) atomic size difference δ versus Cu content x(x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1) calculated for the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs.
Figure 1. Variation in (a)VEC; (b) mixing enthalpy ΔHmix; (c) mixing entropy ΔSmix; (d) atomic size difference δ versus Cu content x(x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1) calculated for the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs.
Materials 16 02922 g001
Materials 16 02922 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs.
Materials 16 02922 g002
Materials 16 02922 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs. (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.2; (c) x = 0.4; (d) x = 0.6; (e) x = 0.8; (f) x = 1.0.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs. (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.2; (c) x = 0.4; (d) x = 0.6; (e) x = 0.8; (f) x = 1.0.
Materials 16 02922 g003
Materials 16 02922 g004a 550Materials 16 02922 g004b 550Materials 16 02922 g004c 550
Figure 4. Elemental EDS mapping of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs. (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.2; (c) x = 0.4; (d) x = 0.6; (e) x = 0.8; (f) x = 1.0.
Figure 4. Elemental EDS mapping of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs. (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.2; (c) x = 0.4; (d) x = 0.6; (e) x = 0.8; (f) x = 1.0.
Materials 16 02922 g004aMaterials 16 02922 g004bMaterials 16 02922 g004c
Materials 16 02922 g005 550
Figure 5. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs in 0.6 M NaCl solution.
Figure 5. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs in 0.6 M NaCl solution.
Materials 16 02922 g005
Materials 16 02922 g006 550
Figure 6. Fitted electrochemical AC impedance of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs in 0.6 M NaCl solution. (a) Nyquist plot; (b) Bode plot; (c) Phase angle plot.
Figure 6. Fitted electrochemical AC impedance of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs in 0.6 M NaCl solution. (a) Nyquist plot; (b) Bode plot; (c) Phase angle plot.
Materials 16 02922 g006
Materials 16 02922 g007 550
Figure 7. The equivalent electric circuit for impedance data.
Figure 7. The equivalent electric circuit for impedance data.
Materials 16 02922 g007
Materials 16 02922 g008 550
Figure 8. Surface morphology of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs after kinetic potential polarization tests in 0.6 M NaCl solution. (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.2; (c) x = 0.4; (d) x = 0.6; (e) x = 0.8; (f) x = 1.0.
Figure 8. Surface morphology of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs after kinetic potential polarization tests in 0.6 M NaCl solution. (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.2; (c) x = 0.4; (d) x = 0.6; (e) x = 0.8; (f) x = 1.0.
Materials 16 02922 g008
Table
Table 1. Electrochemical corrosion parameters of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs obtained from potentiodynamic polarization curve measured in 0.6 M NaCl solution.
Table 1. Electrochemical corrosion parameters of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs obtained from potentiodynamic polarization curve measured in 0.6 M NaCl solution.
SamplesEcorr(V)Icorr(μA/cm2)
x = 0−0.4110.131
x = 0.2−0.5720.499
x = 0.4−0.5260.695
x = 0.6−0.3891.145
x = 0.8−0.4072.182
x = 1.0−0.2392.778
304 L−0.4154.7
Table
Table 2. Impedance fitting parameters of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs.
Table 2. Impedance fitting parameters of AlCrTiV0.5Cux lightweight HEAs.
SamplesR1(Ω·cm2)CPE1-T
(μF·cm−2)		CPE1-PR2(Ω·cm2)CPE2-T
(μF·cm−2)		CPE2-PR3(Ω·cm2)
x = 03.1830.03830.96715.0934.9540.747437,920
x = 0.22.4440.03590.9626.41628.2170.770255,620
x = 0.43.1060.06590.99418.1738.6410.81775,311
x = 0.62.8180.04620.95910.833.6760.77570,653
x = 0.85.8080.03440.97759.1930.4180.78245,098
x = 1.01.9340.08620.87110.5637.6560.79031,276
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, Z.; Li, B.; Luo, Z.; Chen, X.; Tang, Y.; Yang, G.; Gong, P. A Lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux High-Entropy Alloy with Excellent Corrosion Resistance. Materials 2023, 16, 2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072922

AMA Style

Peng Z, Li B, Luo Z, Chen X, Tang Y, Yang G, Gong P. A Lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux High-Entropy Alloy with Excellent Corrosion Resistance. Materials. 2023; 16(7):2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072922

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Zhen, Baowei Li, Zaibin Luo, Xuefei Chen, Yao Tang, Guannan Yang, and Pan Gong. 2023. "A Lightweight AlCrTiV0.5Cux High-Entropy Alloy with Excellent Corrosion Resistance" Materials 16, no. 7: 2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072922

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop