Next Article in Journal
Impact Resistance of a Fiber Metal Laminate Skin Bio-Inspired Composite Sandwich Panel with a Rubber and Foam Dual Core
Next Article in Special Issue
Rheological Characteristics of Fe–C–Cr(Ni) Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Data-Driven Deep Learning Framework for Material Mechanical Properties Prediction with the Focus on Dual-Phase Steel Microstructures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of the Functionalities of a Biochar Electrode Combined with a Photoelectrochemical Cell
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural, Magnetic and Vibrational Properties of Van Der Waals Ferromagnet CrBr3 at High Pressure

1
Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
2
Department of Nuclear-Physical Materials Science, Institute of Physics, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(1), 454; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010454
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 31 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Materials Physics)

Abstract

:
The crystal and magnetic structures of van der Waals layered ferromagnet Cr Br 3 were studied using X-ray powder diffraction and neutron powder diffraction at pressures up to 23 GPa at ambient temperature and up to 2.8 GPa in the temperature range 6–300 K, respectively. The vibration spectra of Cr Br 3 were studied using Raman spectroscopy at pressures up to 23 GPa at ambient temperature. The anomalous pressure behavior of structural parameters and vibrational modes was observed, associated with a gradual isostructural phase transition in the pressure range 2.5–7 GPa. The Curie temperature TC reduced rapidly with a pressure coefficient d T C / d P = 4.1 ( 4 ) K/GPa. A full suppression of the ferromagnetic state was expected at PC~8.4 GPa, where onset of the antiferromagnetic spin arrangement or magnetically disordered state may take place. Anomalies in Raman spectra at P~15 GPa point to another possible phase transformation in Cr Br 3 , which may be related to the proximity of metallization of this van der Waals ferromagnet.

1. Introduction

A discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional (2D) atomically thin van der Waals (vdW) magnets initiated comprehensive fundamental and applied research of these materials, demonstrating challenging physical phenomena and highly promising for applications in spintronics and electronics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The layered structure and the vdW gap between the layers in two-dimensional vdW magnets provide different routes to manipulate their magnetic properties. In particular, an application of high pressure through changing interatomic distances and angles gives an effective way to adjust both magnetic and electronic properties without changing the chemical composition [9,10]. Applying pressure predominantly compresses the weakly bonded interplanar distances and switches the lattice toward a 3D character in a van der Waals magnet. As an example, pressure causes changes in the stacking magnetic order of layers, which induces a phase transition from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic in the bilayer system CrI3 [9,10,11].
Recent studies have demonstrated a rich variety of pressure-induced phenomena in vdW materials. In antiferromagnet FePX3 (X = S, Se) pressure-induced insulator–metal transition, structural transitions, and spin crossover, and also the emergence of superconductivity (in FePSe3), were reported [12,13,14]. In FePS3, the initial antiferromagnetic interplanar coupling with strong 2D character is switched by high pressure to a ferromagnetic interplanar one and the magnetic state evolves from 2D-like to 3D-like character [15]. In CrSiTe3, the ferromagnetically ordered state transfers to the paramagnetic one with increasing pressure, accompanied by a structural transition and the appearance of superconductivity [16]. In Cr2Ge2Te6, pressure-induced spin reorientation was discovered, which drove equilibrium magnetization from the c axis to the ab plane [17]. The vdW ferromagnets demonstrate a different response of TC under pressure. While it increases in CrI3 and VI3 [18,19], a suppression of TC was found in Cr2Ge2Te6 [20], CrBr3 [21], Fe3GeTe2 [22]. A pressure-induced semiconductor-to-metal transition was observed in CrI3, accompanied by strengthening of the AFM interactions [23]. The isostructural phase transition in CrCl3 was detected at about ~10 GPa, followed by electronic topological transition and metallization at P~30 GPa [24,25].
Among the vdW CrY3 family (Y = Cl, Br, I), the structural and magnetic properties of the CrBr3 representative remain weakly explored. Recently this material has attracted particular attention due to pronounced negative thermal expansion effects [26,27,28]. It crystallizes in a rhombohedral structure of R 3 ¯ symmetry, where the Cr atoms form a honeycomb lattice, which is clenched by two atomic planes of Br atoms. The ferromagnetic order is settled in CrBr3 below the critical temperature of 36 K. In this work, the structural, magnetic and vibrational properties of CrBr3 under high pressure were studied by a combination of X-ray, neutron diffraction and Raman spectroscopy techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

The polycrystalline CrBr3 sample was made from single crystals supplied by HQ Graphene. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) experiments at high pressures up to 23 GPa were performed using the SAXS/WAXS Xeuss 3.0 system (XENOCS SAS, Grenoble, France) with the Dectris Eiger 2R 1 M detector, Mo K α radiation (λ = 0.71078 Å). The Almax Plate type diamond anvil cell was used. Diamonds with culets of 250 µm were taken. The sample was loaded into a hole of 150 µm diameter made in the Re gasket to about 20 µm thickness.
Neutron powder diffraction (ND) measurements were performed in the temperature range 6–300 K at pressures up to ~3 GPa using a DN-6 diffractometer [29] at IBR-2 high flux pulsed reactor (FLNP JINR, Dubna, Russia). A powder sample volume of about 2 mm2 was loaded into the sapphire anvil high pressure cells [30]. The spherical holes with a diameter of 2 mm were drilled at the anvil’s culets for the quasi-hydrostatic pressure distribution at the sample surface. Several tiny ruby chips were placed at different points of the sample surface and the pressure was determined by a standard ruby fluorescence technique. Measurements of the pressure distribution on the sample yielded typical pressure inhomogeneities of ±15%. The diffraction patterns were collected at the scattering angle of 90° with a resolution of Δd/d = 0.022. The neutron and X-ray diffraction data were analyzed by the Rietveld method using the Fullprof 7.6 software [31].
Raman spectra at ambient temperature and pressures up to ~20 GPa were collected using a LabRAM HR spectrometer (Horiba Gr, Montpellier, France) with a wavelength excitation of 633 nm emitted from He–Ne laser, 1800 grating, a confocal hole of 100 μm, and ×20 objective. The Almax Plate type diamond anvil cell was used.

3. Results

3.1. X-ray Diffraction

The XRD patterns of CrBr3 measured at selected pressures and ambient temperature are shown in Figure 1a. They correspond to the initial rhombohedral crystal structure of R 3 ¯ symmetry. The values of lattice parameters determined at ambient conditions, a = 6.270(4) and c = 18.269(5) Å, were consistent with those obtained previously [6,26,32]. At moderate pressures, the lattice compression of CrBr3 was markedly anisotropic (Figure 1c) with the c lattice parameter nearly twice as compressible as the a parameter. The corresponding average compressibility values [ k i = ( 1 / a i 0 ) ( d a i / d P ) T ] were k a 1 = 0.0067(3) and k c 1 = 0.0147(2) GPa−1. At transition pressure Ptr~7 GPa, a significant change in pressure behavior of the c lattice parameter occurred (Figure 1c). Its compressibility was reduced by about four times to k c 2 = 0.0035(4) GPa−1, becoming comparable with that of the a parameter, which decreased by more than twice to k a 2 = 0.0026(1) GPa−1. In the absence of qualitative changes in the XRD patterns, one may suggest that the observed lattice compression anomaly was associated with the isostructural phase transition into a denser phase with reduced distance between the vdW layers. A somewhat similar phenomenon was also observed in a related compound CrCl3 at ~11 GPa [25]. It should be noted that the pressure-induced phase transition in CrY3 materials occurred in a smoother manner in comparison with FePX3 (X = S, Se) systems, where first-order structural phase transitions at ~13 GPa and ~8 GPa, respectively, were accompanied by discontinuous drops of the lattice parameters [12,14]. This observed large-volume collapse has been proposed to be associated with spin-crossover and insulator-metal transitions. It is also interesting to note that, in contrast to CrY3, in ternary CrSiTe3 and Cr2Ge2Te6 systems, a pressure-induced suppression of the crystalline phase, followed by an amorphization process, was reported [33,34].
The volume compressibility data of CrBr3 (Figure 1d) were fitted by the third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state (1) [35]:
P = 3 2 B 0 ( x 7 / 3 x 5 / 3 ) [ 1 + 3 4 ( B 4 ) ( x 2 / 3 1 ) ]
where x = V / V 0 is the relative volume change; V 0 is the unit cell volume at ambient pressure; B 0 , B are the bulk modulus [ B 0 = V ( d P / d V ) T ] and its pressure derivative [ B = ( d B 0 / d P ) T ] .
The obtained bulk moduli for the ambient pressure and high-pressure phases were B 0 = 23 ( 4 ) and B 0 = 94 ( 3 ) GPa at fixed B = 4 . The ambient-pressure phase value was comparable with those obtained for CrCl3 ( B 0 = 28 ( 2 ) GPa) [25]; CrSiTe3 ( B 0 ~ 37 ( 1 ) GPa, B = 3.82 ) [34]; and Cr2Ge2Te6 ( B 0 = 39.2 GPa, B = 3.8 ) [36].

3.2. Neutron Diffraction

Neutron diffraction patterns of CrBr3, measured at selected pressures and temperatures, are shown in Figure 2. At ambient pressure below TC = 36(2) K, the appearance of additional magnetic contribution to intensities of the peaks (110), (012), (101) was revealed, indicating formation of the FM state [26]. The ordered magnetic moments were oriented along the c-axis and their values were M = 2.74(8) µB. Remarkably, the strongly anisotropic thermal expansion of the CrBr3 lattice with the pronounced variation of the c lattice parameter was also observed, even upon compression up to 2.8 GPa. As a result, the negative thermal expansion of the unit cell volume for T < TC was preserved in the studied pressure range (Figure 3a). This effect was associated with a strong spin–phonon coupling [26]. The average volume thermal expansion coefficients ( a V = ( 1 / V ) ( d V / d T ) ) were a V = 2.2 × 10 5   K 1 for T > TC and a V = 1.8 × 10 5 K 1 for T < TC at P = 1 GPa and a V = 1.9 × 10 5   K 1 for T > TC and a V = 1.4 · 10 5 K 1 for T < TC at P = 2 GPa. The obtained coefficients for regions below TC decreased with application of pressure, and this effect correlated with a suppression of long-range magnetic ordering, as we discuss below.
With a pressure increase, a progressive reduction of the magnetic contribution, to the (110) and (101) peaks, was detected (Figure 2), evidencing reduction of magnetic moment and suppression of magnetic ordering.
The temperature dependences of the Cr3+ magnetic moments at selected pressures are shown in Figure 3b. They were analyzed in the framework of the molecular field model using expression:
M M 0 = B s ( 3 S S + 1 M M 0 T C T )
where B s is the Brillouin function, S is the spin of the system ( S   = 3/2) and M 0 is the ordered magnetic moment at T = 0 . The obtained Curie temperature decreased under pressure with a coefficient d T C / d P = 4.1 ( 4 ) K/GPa (Figure 3c). Simultaneously, the ordered Cr3+ magnetic moments of the FM state at T = 6 K decreased from 2.74(8) μB to 1.8(4) μB in the pressure range 0–2.8 GPa. These decreasing trends were also detected for this compound earlier from magnetization measurements in a more restricted pressure range up to 1 GPa, providing a comparable value of d T C / d P = 3.1 K/GPa [32]. The pressure behavior of CrBr3 was opposite to CrI3, where a pronounced increase of TC, by about 7.5%, for an applied pressure of 1 GPa occurred [18].
The extrapolation of the experimental Curie temperature pressure dependence of our work showed (Figure 3c) that the TC value turned to zero at PC~8.4 GPa. Therefore, one might expect a modification of the ground state in CrBr3 from FM to either AFM or a magnetically disordered state in the high-pressure phase for P > PC. The pressure evolution of magnetic exchange coupling constants in CrBr3 was theoretically studied by means of ab-initio calculations [37]. It was revealed that in a wide pressure range, the in-plane exchange constant J i n for CrBr3 took a dominant value compared to the out-of-plane J o u t , and it decreased rapidly. In contrast, a weak growth of J o u t occurred under pressure. The pronounced pressure-induced reduction of the J i n exchange constant was a possible mechanism for a destabilization of the FM ground state in CrBr3. It also followed an evolution trend from the FM to AFM state upon the “chemical” pressure effect in the CrY3 family by halide ionic radius (and relevant lattice volume) reduction from I to Cl.

3.3. Raman Spectroscopy

The Raman spectra of CrBr3 measured at various pressures up to ~22 GPa are shown in Figure 4. At pressures below 2.5 GPa, six Raman active modes were observed, in consistence with the rhombohedral R 3 ¯ lattice symmetry [26,38,39,40]. They were assigned as 73.4 cm−1 ( E g 1 ), 106 cm−1 ( A g 1 ), 141.2 cm−1 ( E g 2 ), 149.6 (cm−1 E g 3 ), 184.8 cm−1 ( A g 2 ), 279.5 cm−1 ( E g 4 ) (Table 1). According to [40], the A g 1 and A g 2 modes were mainly associated with in-plane and out-of-plane vibrations of Br atoms, respectively. It was demonstrated that the E g 3 and E g 2 modes were degenerate, resembling the in-plane shear motion of the Br atomic planes and also involving Cr atoms with out-of-plane displacements [40]. The pressure coefficients and calculated Gruneisen parameters γ for all the observed Raman modes are listed in Table 1.
At pressures above 2.5 GPa, the emergence of a new Raman mode was observed at 116.08 cm−1, further labeled as M1. Upon further compression, intensities of this mode and the E g 3 one increased strongly, while the intensity of the A g 1 mode rapidly suppressed (Figure 4). At P  ~ 15 GPa, the E g 2 mode merged with M1. Above this pressure, noticeable broadening of the Raman lines was found.
Most of the observed Raman mode frequencies, except for A g 1 and E g 1 , increased nearly linearly under pressure (Figure 5). The pressure dependence of the A g 1 mode demonstrated a sharp change of the pressure coefficient at P~6 GPa, correlating with the anomaly in the pressure behavior of the c lattice parameter (Figure 2c). A similar less pronounced change also occurred for the E g 1 mode. These effects, along with observation of the M1 mode, were associated with the gradual isostructural phase transition, which likely started at P~2.5 GPa and evolved up to 7 GPa, becoming first visible in the Raman spectra and, subsequently, in the XRD patterns, when sufficient volume of the material was being transformed. The merging of the E g 2 and M1 modes, along with another weaker modification of the A g 1 mode pressure coefficient at 15 GPa (Figure 5), might be a signature of another phase transition. Taking into account the absence of qualitative changes in the XRD patterns, this transformation might be of an electronic nature, like the semiconductor to metal transition observed in CrI3 at pressures above 22 GPa [23] and in CrCl3 at ~30 GPa [24].

4. Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that the pressure-induced isostructural phase transition evolved gradually in vdW ferromagnet CrBr3 over a pressure range of 2.5–7 GPa. This transition emerged in Raman spectra around P~2.5 GPa by the appearance of an extra Raman mode and manifested finally in anomalies in the pressure behavior of the lattice parameters, unit cell volume, and A g 1 and E g 1 vibrational mode frequencies at P~6–7 GPa, when a volume of the pressure-induced phase became sufficiently dominant. The Curie temperature of CrBr3 reduced rapidly with a pressure coefficient d T C / d P = 4.1 ( 4 ) K/GPa, implying instability of the initial FM order. A full suppression of the FM state and a magnetic transition to either AFM state or into a magnetically disordered one was expected at P~8.4 GPa. Additional anomalies in pressure behavior of Raman mode frequencies, detected at P~15 GPa, pointed to another phase transformation, presumably associated with the metallization process.

Author Contributions

D.K., S.K., E.L., I.Z. and B.S. performed the neutron diffraction experiments and data analysis. O.L., I.Z. and E.L. performed the X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy experiments and data analysis. O.L., D.K. and S.K. prepared the first draft of manuscript and all authors contribute to the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gong, C.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Ji, H.; Stern, A.; Xia, Y.; Cao, T.; Bao, W.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. Discovery of Intrinsic Ferromagnetism in Two-Dimensional van Der Waals Crystals. Nature 2017, 546, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Huang, B.; Clark, G.; Navarro-Moratalla, E.; Klein, D.R.; Cheng, R.; Seyler, K.L.; Zhong, D.; Schmidgall, E.; McGuire, M.A.; Cobden, D.H.; et al. Layer-Dependent Ferromagnetism in a van Der Waals Crystal down to the Monolayer Limit. Nature 2017, 546, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Burch, K.S.; Mandrus, D.; Park, J.G. Magnetism in Two-Dimensional van Der Waals Materials. Nature 2018, 563, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W.; Wong, P.K.J.; Zhu, R.; Wee, A.T.S. Van Der Waals Magnets: Wonder Building Blocks for Two-Dimensional Spintronics? InfoMat 2019, 1, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wang, M.C.; Huang, C.C.; Cheung, C.H.; Chen, C.Y.; Tan, S.G.; Huang, T.W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, G.; Feng, Y.P.; et al. Prospects and Opportunities of 2D van Der Waals Magnetic Systems. Ann. Phys. 2020, 532, 1900452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, W.B.; Qu, Q.; Zhu, P.; Lam, C.H. Robust Intrinsic Ferromagnetism and Half Semiconductivity in Stable Two-Dimensional Single-Layer Chromium Trihalides. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 12457–12468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Novoselov, K.S.; Mishchenko, A.; Carvalho, A.; Castro Neto, A.H. 2D Materials and van Der Waals Heterostructures. Science 2016, 353, aac9439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Soriano, D.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Fernández-Rossier, J. Magnetic Two-Dimensional Chromium Trihalides: A Theoretical Perspective. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 6225–6234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, T.; Fei, Z.; Yankowitz, M.; Lin, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Hwangbo, K.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, B.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; et al. Switching 2D Magnetic States via Pressure Tuning of Layer Stacking. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1298–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, T.; Jiang, S.; Sivadas, N.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Weber, D.; Goldberger, J.E.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Fennie, C.J.; et al. Pressure-Controlled Interlayer Magnetism in Atomically Thin CrI3. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1303–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, C.; Wang, Q.J.; Xu, B.; Hu, J. Effect of Biaxial Strain and Hydrostatic Pressure on the Magnetic Properties of Bilayer CrI3. Front. Phys. 2021, 16, 53502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Haines, C.R.S.; Coak, M.J.; Wildes, A.R.; Lampronti, G.I.; Liu, C.; Nahai-Williamson, P.; Hamidov, H.; Daisenberger, D.; Saxena, S.S. Pressure-Induced Electronic and Structural Phase Evolution in the van Der Waals Compound FePS3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 266801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Das, S.; Chaturvedi, S.; Tripathy, D.; Grover, S.; Singh, R.; Muthu, D.V.S.; Sampath, S.; Waghmare, U.V.; Sood, A.K. Raman and First-Principles Study of the Pressure-Induced Mott-Insulator to Metal Transition in Bulk FePS3. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 164, 110607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Ying, J.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, J.; Wen, T.; Zhou, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, Q.; Han, F.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Emergent Superconductivity in an Iron-Based Honeycomb Lattice Initiated by Pressure-Driven Spin-Crossover /639/638/298/924 /639/301/119/1003 /120 /128 /145 Article. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Coak, M.J.; Jarvis, D.M.; Hamidov, H.; Wildes, A.R.; Paddison, J.A.M.; Liu, C.; Haines, C.R.S.; Dang, N.T.; Kichanov, S.E.; Savenko, B.N.; et al. Emergent Magnetic Phases in Pressure-Tuned van Der Waals Antiferromagnet FePS3. Phys. Rev. X 2021, 11, 11024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cai, W.; Sun, H.; Xia, W.; Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Gong, Y.; Yao, D.X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, M. Pressure-Induced Superconductivity and Structural Transition in Ferromagnetic CrSiTe3. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 144525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, Z.; Lohmann, M.; Ali, Z.A.; Tang, C.; Li, J.; Xing, W.; Zhong, J.; Jia, S.; Han, W.; Coh, S.; et al. Pressure-Induced Spin Reorientation Transition in Layered Ferromagnetic Insulator Cr2Ge2Te6. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 051004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mondal, S.; Kannan, M.; Das, M.; Govindaraj, L.; Singha, R.; Satpati, B.; Arumugam, S.; Mandal, P. Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on Ferromagnetism in Two-Dimensional CrI3. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 180407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Valenta, J.; Kratochvílová, M.; Míšek, M.; Carva, K.; Kaštil, J.; DoleŽal, P.; Opletal, P.; Čermák, P.; Proschek, P.; Uhlířová, K.; et al. Pressure-Induced Large Increase of Curie Temperature of the van Der Waals Ferromagnet VI3. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 054424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, Y.; Xiao, R.C.; Lin, G.T.; Zhang, R.R.; Ling, L.S.; Ma, Z.W.; Luo, X.; Lu, W.J.; Sun, Y.P.; Sheng, Z.G. Effects of Hydrostatic Pressure on Spin-Lattice Coupling in Two-Dimensional Ferromagnetic Cr2Ge2Te6. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 072409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoshida, H.; Chiba, J.; Kaneko, T.; Fujimori, Y.; Abe, S. Pressure Effect on the Curie Temperature of CrBr3. Phys. B Condens. Matter 1997, 237–238, 525–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ding, S.; Liang, Z.; Yang, J.; Yun, C.; Zhang, P.; Li, Z.; Xue, M.; Liu, Z.; Tian, G.; Liu, F.; et al. Ferromagnetism in Two-Dimensional Fe3GeTe2; Tunability by Hydrostatic Pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 94429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ghosh, A.; Singh, D.; Aramaki, T.; Mu, Q.; Borisov, V.; Kvashnin, Y.; Haider, G.; Jonak, M.; Chareev, D.; Medvedev, S.A.; et al. Exotic Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Layered Formula Presented Single Crystals under High Pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, L081104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hong, M.; Dai, L.; Hu, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; He, Y. Pressure-Induced Structural Phase Transition and Metallization of CrCl3 under Different Hydrostatic Environments up to 50.0 GPa. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 4852–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmad, A.S.; Liang, Y.; Dong, M.; Zhou, X.; Fang, L.; Xia, Y.; Dai, J.; Yan, X.; Yu, X.; Dai, J.; et al. Pressure-Driven Switching of Magnetism in Layered CrCl3. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 22935–22944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kozlenko, D.P.; Lis, O.N.; Kichanov, S.E.; Lukin, E.V.; Belozerova, N.M.; Savenko, B.N. Spin-Induced Negative Thermal Expansion and Spin–Phonon Coupling in van Der Waals Material CrBr3. Npj. Quantum Mater. 2021, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, J.; Yao, Y.; Lin, M.L.; Rösner, M.; Du, Z.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Tan, P.H.; Haas, S.; Wang, H. Spin–Phonon Coupling in Ferromagnetic Monolayer Chromium Tribromide. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2108506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, S.; Long, M.Q.; Wang, Y.P. Negative Thermal Expansion of Two-Dimensional Magnets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 072403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kozlenko, D.; Kichanov, S.; Lukin, E.; Savenko, B. The DN-6 Neutron Diffractometer for High-Pressure Research at Half a Megabar Scale. Crystals 2018, 8, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kozlenko, D.P.; Kichanov, S.E.; Lukin, E.V.; Savenko, B.N. High-Pressure Neutron Diffraction Study of the Crystal and Magnetic Structure of Materials at the Pulsed Reactor IBR-2: Current Opportunities and Prospects. Crystallogr. Rep. 2021, 66, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent Advances in Magnetic Structure Determination by Neutron Powder Diffraction. Phys. B Phys. Condens. Matter 1993, 192, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Olmos, R.; Alam, S.; Chang, P.H.; Gandha, K.; Nlebedim, I.C.; Cole, A.; Tafti, F.; Zope, R.R.; Singamaneni, S.R. Pressure Dependent Magnetic Properties on Bulk CrBr3 Single Crystals. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 911, 165034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, Z.; Xia, W.; Xu, K.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Yu, N.; Zou, Z.; Zhao, J.; Wang, L.; et al. Pressure-Induced Structural Phase Transition and a Special Amorphization Phase of Two-Dimensional Ferromagnetic Semiconductor Cr2Ge2Te6. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 13885–13891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xu, K.; Yu, Z.; Xia, W.; Xu, M.; Mai, X.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Miao, X.; Xu, M. Unique 2D-3D Structure Transformations in Trichalcogenide CrSiTe3 under High Pressure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 15600–15606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Birch, F. Equation of State and Thermodynamic Parameters of NaCl to 300 Kbar in the High-Temperature Domain. J. Geophys. Res. 1986, 91, 4949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cai, W.; Yan, L.; Chong, S.K.; Xu, J.; Zhang, D.; Deshpande, V.V.; Zhou, L.; Deemyad, S. Pressure-Induced Metallization in the Absence of a Structural Transition in the Layered Ferromagnetic Insulator Cr2Ge2Te6. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 085116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fumega, A.O.; Blanco-Canosa, S.; Babu-Vasili, H.; Gargiani, P.; Li, H.; Zhou, J.S.; Rivadulla, F.; Pardo, V. Electronic Structure and Magnetic Exchange Interactions of Cr-Based van Der Waals Ferromagnets. A Comparative Study between CrBr3 and Cr2Ge2Te6. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13582–13589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bermudezt, V.M. Unit-cell vibrational spectra of chromium trichoride and chromium tribromide. Solid State Commun. 1976, 19, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Larson, D.T.; Kaxiras, E. Raman Spectrum of CrI3: An Ab Initio Study. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yin, T.; Ulman, K.A.; Liu, S.; Granados del Águila, A.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Serra, M.; Sedmidubsky, D.; Sofer, Z.; Quek, S.Y.; et al. Chiral Phonons and Giant Magneto-Optical Effect in CrBr3 2D Magnet. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2101618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of CrBr3 obtained at selected pressures and ambient temperature, and refined by the Rietveld method. Experimental points and calculated profiles are shown. The tick below marks the calculated positions of the structural peaks of phase of rhombohedral phase of CrBr3. The asterisks (*) indicate additional diffraction peaks from the rhenium gasket; (b) Schematically representation of rhombohedral crystal structure of CrBr3. The unit cell (left) and top view (right) are shown. The orientation of the crystallography axes is presented; (c) The lattice parameters of CrBr3 as a function of pressure. The phase transition pressure Ptr is labeled. The solid lines are linear fit of experimental data; (d) The pressure dependence of unit cell volume of the ambient and high-pressure phases of CrBr3, fitted by the third order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state (1). The red circles represent the obtained values for unit-cell volume from ND data (see below).
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of CrBr3 obtained at selected pressures and ambient temperature, and refined by the Rietveld method. Experimental points and calculated profiles are shown. The tick below marks the calculated positions of the structural peaks of phase of rhombohedral phase of CrBr3. The asterisks (*) indicate additional diffraction peaks from the rhenium gasket; (b) Schematically representation of rhombohedral crystal structure of CrBr3. The unit cell (left) and top view (right) are shown. The orientation of the crystallography axes is presented; (c) The lattice parameters of CrBr3 as a function of pressure. The phase transition pressure Ptr is labeled. The solid lines are linear fit of experimental data; (d) The pressure dependence of unit cell volume of the ambient and high-pressure phases of CrBr3, fitted by the third order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state (1). The red circles represent the obtained values for unit-cell volume from ND data (see below).
Materials 16 00454 g001
Figure 2. Neutron diffraction patterns of CrBr3 measured at selected pressures and temperatures and refined by the Rietveld method. The experimental points and calculated profiles are shown. Ticks below represent calculated positions of the nuclear peaks of the rhombohedral phase of CrBr3. The magnetic contribution into nuclear peaks is labeled as “N+FM”. Inset: the pressure evolution of the characteristic peak with additional magnetic contribution.
Figure 2. Neutron diffraction patterns of CrBr3 measured at selected pressures and temperatures and refined by the Rietveld method. The experimental points and calculated profiles are shown. Ticks below represent calculated positions of the nuclear peaks of the rhombohedral phase of CrBr3. The magnetic contribution into nuclear peaks is labeled as “N+FM”. Inset: the pressure evolution of the characteristic peak with additional magnetic contribution.
Materials 16 00454 g002
Figure 3. (a) The temperature dependences of the unit-cell volume obtained from neutron diffraction and normalized to the ambient temperature values; (b) The temperature dependences of the ordered Cr3+ magnetic moments at selected pressures. The solid lines represent fitting by function described by Equation (2); (c) Curie temperature as a function of pressure and its linear extrapolation.
Figure 3. (a) The temperature dependences of the unit-cell volume obtained from neutron diffraction and normalized to the ambient temperature values; (b) The temperature dependences of the ordered Cr3+ magnetic moments at selected pressures. The solid lines represent fitting by function described by Equation (2); (c) Curie temperature as a function of pressure and its linear extrapolation.
Materials 16 00454 g003
Figure 4. The Raman spectra of CrBr3 measured at selected pressures and room temperature.
Figure 4. The Raman spectra of CrBr3 measured at selected pressures and room temperature.
Materials 16 00454 g004
Figure 5. Pressure dependences of selected Raman shift for CrBr3. Solid lines are linear fits to the observed frequencies.
Figure 5. Pressure dependences of selected Raman shift for CrBr3. Solid lines are linear fits to the observed frequencies.
Materials 16 00454 g005
Table 1. The assignment and frequencies of Raman mode, the pressure coefficients and mode Gruneisen parameters γ i for vibration modes of CrBr3 calculated for different pressure ranges. The mode Gruneisen parameters γ i are determined as γ i = B 0 / v i ( d v i / d P ) T , where B 0 is the bulk modulus ( B 0 = 23 ( 4 ) GPa for P < 6 GPa and B 0 = 94 ( 4 ) GPa for P > 6 GPa).
Table 1. The assignment and frequencies of Raman mode, the pressure coefficients and mode Gruneisen parameters γ i for vibration modes of CrBr3 calculated for different pressure ranges. The mode Gruneisen parameters γ i are determined as γ i = B 0 / v i ( d v i / d P ) T , where B 0 is the bulk modulus ( B 0 = 23 ( 4 ) GPa for P < 6 GPa and B 0 = 94 ( 4 ) GPa for P > 6 GPa).
Mode Symmetryν0
(cm−1)
d v i / d P  
(cm−1/GPa)
γ i
E g 1 73.42.27 (P < 6 GPa)
1.23 (P > 6 GPa)
0.71 (P < 6 GPa)
1.45 (P > 6 GPa)
A g 1 106.054.0 (P < 6 GPa)
1.22 (P > 6 GPa)
0.87 (P < 6 GPa)
0.96 (P > 6 GPa)
M1116.082.822.29
E g 2 142.181.330.22
E g 3 149.62.640.4
A g 2 184.83.570.44
E g 4 279.563.390.27
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lis, O.; Kozlenko, D.; Kichanov, S.; Lukin, E.; Zel, I.; Savenko, B. Structural, Magnetic and Vibrational Properties of Van Der Waals Ferromagnet CrBr3 at High Pressure. Materials 2023, 16, 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010454

AMA Style

Lis O, Kozlenko D, Kichanov S, Lukin E, Zel I, Savenko B. Structural, Magnetic and Vibrational Properties of Van Der Waals Ferromagnet CrBr3 at High Pressure. Materials. 2023; 16(1):454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lis, Olga, Denis Kozlenko, Sergey Kichanov, Evgenii Lukin, Ivan Zel, and Boris Savenko. 2023. "Structural, Magnetic and Vibrational Properties of Van Der Waals Ferromagnet CrBr3 at High Pressure" Materials 16, no. 1: 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop