# Strength Properties of Structural Glulam Manufactured from Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Side Boards

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

^{2}.

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Experimental Material

^{2}to 19.7 kN/mm

^{2}were used. The pieces were selected so that the faces were characterised by a comparable modulus of elasticity (E +/− 0.2 kN/mm

^{2}). Narrow timber (85 mm) was not tested and it was collected from the stack at random. It was assumed that narrow timber will have the modulus of elasticity ranging from 4.7 kN/mm

^{2}to 7 kN/mm

^{2}, i.e., from the value of the 5% quantile to the mean value specified in the EN 338 standard [37] for timber grade C14. The equivalent value of the modulus of elasticity for the beam was calculated from Equation (1):

^{2}to 13.45 kN/mm

^{2}and under advantageous conditions such beams should meet the requirements for glulam grade GL24c elements, since the mean value for this range of values is 11.65 kN/mm

^{2}.

^{2}, KS 11 kN/mm

^{2}and KG 9 kN/mm

^{2}(EN 338 [37]) and applying the known Equation (2) [14]:

_{ef}—effective/substitute modulus of elasticity, N/mm

^{2},

_{x}—area moment of inertia, mm

^{4},

_{i}—modulus of elasticity of layer, N/mm

^{2},

_{i}—cross-sectional area, mm

^{2},

^{2}. Thus both variants should exhibit similar ranges of strength and modulus of elasticity.

^{2}. Melamine-urea-formaldehyde resin MUF 1247 was used as a bonding agent together with the dedicated hardener 2526. Both products were manufactured by Akzo Nobel (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The mixture was prepared taking into consideration the conditions found in the laboratory room. It was assumed that 20 g of the hardener need to be added to 100 g resin. The adopted amount of the hardener is consistent with the recommendation for this resin by Akzo Nobel. The adhesive was applied using a glue roller applicator. Manufactured beams were subjected to a 4-point bending strength test according to the diagram presented in Figure 3. Beams were tested in the upright position.

## 3. Results and Discussion

^{2}to 24.1 kN/mm

^{2}(Figure 4). It should be noted that the analysis was done only for wide boards. However, it does not have a normal distribution, although the median is 13.96 kN/mm

^{2}and it is only slightly lower than the mean (14.21 kN/mm

^{2}). Skewness is 0.405 and kurtosis is 0.202. Over 50% of the batch is timber with the modulus of elasticity between 12 kN/mm

^{2}and 16 kN/mm

^{2}and these are very high values, while only approximately 1% tested pieces had the modulus of elasticity below 8 kN/mm

^{2}in the case of side boards with width exceeding 100 mm.

^{3}and the characteristic value (5-percentile) is 480 kg/m

^{3}. Moreover, almost 75% of tested timber pieces had a density between 500 kg/m

^{3}and 650 kg/m

^{3}, while only 8% of pieces had a density below 500 kg/m

^{3}(Figure 6). However, according to the data given in Figure 5, timber with a density below 500 kg/m

^{3}is characterised by the modulus of elasticity from 7 kN/mm

^{2}to almost 15 kN/mm

^{2}and these are relatively high values.

^{2}(Figure 4), thus it is 2-fold higher than it had been assumed. However, when assuming the mean value the modulus of elasticity when calculated according to formula 1 and beams of type CW-V at approximately 15.7 kN/mm

^{2}should be expected, whereas the obtained value is much lower. Nevertheless, the modulus of elasticity was assessed only for sawn timber with width over 100 mm. Wider sawn timber probably originates from deeper located log layers, thus it may exhibit better mechanical properties. In the latter case, i.e., BW-H beams, the assumed values of the modulus of elasticity for a given grade during visual grading are underestimated. However, it may be assumed that this difference, amounting, for these beams, to approximately 10%, is a factor increasing certainty of the required quality for the manufactured elements. In the case of glulam elements and the modulus of elasticity evaluated according to the PN-EN 14080:2013 standard [40], not only the mean modulus of elasticity is assessed, but it is also the value of the 5th percentile. In the case of the analysed beams, these values are 11.3 kN/mm

^{2}and 12.1 kN/mm

^{2}for BW-H and CW-V beams, respectively.

^{2}, while for BW-H beams it is 59.2 N/mm

^{2}(Figure 9). Although the difference is approximately 8%, there are no grounds to state that both batches differ statistically. Recorded values are very high because they account for approximately 50% bending strength of pine wood. However, a statistically significant value for bending strength is the value of the (5-percentile). In the case of analysed beam types, these values amount to 42.0 N/mm

^{2}and 43.2 N/mm

^{2}for BW-H and CW-V beams, respectively. In both cases characteristic bending strength is also very similar; nevertheless, a more advantageous value for obtained for CW-V beams. Thanks to such ranges of strength and the modulus of elasticity both beam types are characterised by a greater load carrying capacity than that required for GL24c beams.

## 4. Conclusions

- -
- the modulus of elasticity of side boards falls within a very wide range of values, from approx. 5.5 kN/mm
^{2}to 24 kN/mm^{2}; however, over 60% of the material is sawn timber with the modulus of elasticity over 11 kN/mm^{2}, - -
- side boards are characterised by high elastic properties,
- -
- in accordance with the assumptions, both variants were characterised by a comparable modulus of elasticity, although it was much higher than it had been expected,
- -
- static bending strength of beams manufactured in the vertical timber arrangement system is slightly higher than that of beams produced from horizontally arranged timber,
- -
- beams manufactured from horizontally arranged timber layers shows a smaller confidence interval for static bending strength,
- -
- the difference in the value of the (5-percentile) for both beam types is slight and it needs to be stated that both beam types exhibit a high bending strength exceeding 40 N/mm
^{2}.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Caniato, M.; Marzi, A.; da Monteiro Silva, S.; Gasparella, A. A review of the thermal and acoustic properties of materials for timber building construction. J. Build. Eng.
**2021**, 43, 103066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ramage, M.; Burridge, H.; Busse-Wicher, M.; Fereday, G.; Reynolds, T.; Shah, D.; Wu, G.; Yu, L.; Fleming, P.; Densley-Tingley, D.; et al. The wod from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2017**, 68, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hekkert, M.; Goverse, T.; Groenewegen, P.; Worell, E.; Smits, R.E.H.M. Wood in the Residential Construction Sector: Opportunities and Constraints. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
**2001**, 34, 53–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Steele, P.H. Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling; Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-39; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 1984.
- Baltrušaitis, A.; Pranckevičienė, V. The Influence of Log Offset on Sawn Timber Volume Yield. Mater. Sci.
**2005**, 11, 403–406. [Google Scholar] - Rongrong, L.; Pingxiang, C.; Xiaolei, G.; Ji, F. A Novel Sawing Method for Small-Diameter Log. Wood Res.
**2015**, 60, 293–300. [Google Scholar] - Gil-Moreno, D.; Ridley-Ellis, D.; Harte, A.M. Timber grading potential of Douglas fir in the Republic of Ireland and the UK. Int. Wood Prod. J.
**2019**, 10, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gil-Moreno, D.; Ridley-Ellis, D.; McLean, P. Timber Properties of Noble fir, Norway Spruce, Western Red Cedar and Western Hemlock Grown in Great Britain; Research Note FCRN026; Research Note-Forestry Commission: Edinburgh, UK, 2016.
- Rais, A.; Pretzsch, H.; Van de Kuilen, J.-W.G. Roundwood pre-grading with longitudinal acoustic waves for production of structural boards. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod.
**2014**, 72, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Krzosek, S.; Burawska-Kupniewska, I.; Mańkowski, P. The Influence of Scots Pine Log Type (Pinus sylvestris L.) on the Mechanical Properties of Lumber. Forests
**2020**, 11, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Burawska-Kupniewska, I.; Krzosek, S.; Mańkowski, P.; Grześkiewicz, M. Quality and Bending Properties of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Sawn Timber. Forests
**2020**, 11, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mirski, R.; Malinowski, Z.; Dziurka, D.; Wieruszewski, M. A Qualitative Analysis of Sawn Timber Obtained from Various Sites Throughout Poland in the Aspect of Polish and European Standards of Quality. Forests
**2020**, 11, 713. [Google Scholar] - Mirski, R.; Dziurka, D.; Chuda-Kowalska, M.; Wieruszewski, M.; Kawalerczyk, J.; Trociński, A. The Usefulness of Pine Timber (Pinus sylvestris L.) for the Production of Structural Elements. Part I: Evaluation of the Quality of the Pine Timber in the Bending Test. Materials
**2020**, 13, 3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Mirski, R.; Dziurka, D.; Chuda-Kowalska, M.; Kawalerczyk, J.; Kuliński, M.; Łabęda, K. The Usefulness of Pine Timber (Pinus sylvestris L.) for the Production of Structural Elements. Part II: Strength Properties of Glued Laminated Timber. Materials
**2020**, 13, 4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Sikora, K.S.; Krzosek, S. Timber grading within the European Union—Irish and Polish example, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW. For. Wood Technol.
**2014**, 86, 204–209. [Google Scholar] - Bacher, M.; Krzosek, S. Bending and Tension Strength Classes in European Standards, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW. For. Wood Technol.
**2014**, 88, 14–22. [Google Scholar] - Wdowiak, A.; Brol, J. Methods of strength grading of structural timber-comparative analysis of visual and machine grading on the example of scots pine timber from four natural forest regions of Poland. Struct. Environ.
**2019**, 11, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hernandez, R.; Green, D.W.; Kretschmann, D.E.; Verrill, S.P. Improved Utilization of Small-Diameter Ponderosa Pine in Glulam Timber; Research Paper, FPL-RP-625; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 2005; 38p.
- Jankowiak, J.J.; Manbeck, H.B.; Hernandez, R.; Moody, R.G.; Blankenhorn, P.R.; Labosky, P. Efficient Utilization of Red Maple Lumber in Glued-Laminated Timber Beams; Research Paper FPL-RP-541; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 1995; 23p.
- Lei, Y.C.; Zhang, S.Y.; Jiang, Z. Models for predicting lumber bending MOR and MOE based on tree and stand characteristics in black spruce. Wood Sci. Technol.
**2005**, 39, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sulistyowati, I.; Hadi, Y.S.; Surjokusumo, S.; Nugroho, N. The Performance of Lamina’s Thickness for Horizontally Glued Laminated Beam. In Proceedings of the World Timber Conference, Miyazaki, Japan, 2–5 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Fujimoto, K.; Hiramatsu, Y.; Miyatake, A.; Shindo, K.; Karube, M.; Harada, M.; Ukyo, S. Strength properties of glued laminated timber made from edge-glued laminae I: Strength properties of edge-glued karamatsu (Larix kaempferi) laminae. J. Wood Sci.
**2010**, 56, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hiramatsu, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Miyatake, A.; Shindo, K.; Nagao, H.; Kato, H.; Ido, H. Strength properties of glued laminated timber made from edge-glued laminae II: Bending, tensile, and compressive strength of glued laminated timber. J. Wood Sci.
**2011**, 57, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hernandez, R.; Moody, R.C.; Russell, F. Fiber Stress Values for Design of Glulam Timber Utility Structures; Research Paper, FPL-RP-532; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 1995; 23p.
- Martins, C.; Monteiro, S.; Knapic, S.; Dias, A. Assessment of Bending Properties of Sawn and Glulam Blackwood in Portugal. Forests
**2020**, 11, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Nadir, Y.; Nagarajan, P. The behavior of horizontally glued laminated beams using rubber wood. Constr. Build. Mater.
**2014**, 55, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bakalarz, M.; Kossakowski, P.G. Mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber beams strengthened with CFRP sheets. Arch. Civ. Eng.
**2019**, 65, 57–66. [Google Scholar] - Bal, B.C. Some technological properties of laminated veneer lumber produced with fast-growing Poplar and Eucalyptus, Maderas-ciencia Y. Technologia
**2016**, 18, 413–424. [Google Scholar] - McGavin, R.; Nguyen, H.; Gilbert, B.; Dakin, T.; Faircloth, A. A Comparative Study on the Mechanical Properties of Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) Produced from Blending Various Wood Veneers. BioResources
**2019**, 14, 9064–9081. [Google Scholar] - Flaig, M.; Blaß, H.J. Bending strength of cross laminated timber beams loaded in plane. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2014), Quebec City, QC, Canada, 10–14 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Jeleč, M.; Danielsson, H.; Rajčić, V.; Serrano, E. Experimental and numerical investigations of cross-laminated timber elements at in-plane beam loading conditions. Constr. Build. Mater.
**2019**, 206, 329–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fan, M. Performance of edgewise loaded wood based panels and their I-beam components. Constr. Build. Mater.
**2012**, 30, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Crocetti, R.; Ekholm, K.; Kliger, R. Stress-laminated-timber decks: State of the art and design based on Swedish practice. Eur. J. Wood Prod.
**2016**, 74, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chiou, W.S.; Bohnhoff, D.R.; Hernandez, R. Probabilistic Modeling of Unspliced Four-Layer Nail-Laminated Assemblies; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Bohnhof, D.R. Modifications and Extensions to Design Specifications for Mechanically-Laminated Wood Assemblies; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2013; p. 131620162. [Google Scholar]
- Ogunrinde, O.; Gong, M.; Chui, Y.H.; Li, L. Flexural Properties of Downscaled Dowel-Type-Fastener Laminated Timber. Int. J. Sci. Res. Multidiscip. Stud.
**2019**, 5, 98–104. [Google Scholar] - EN 338. Structural Timber—Strength Classes; European Committee for Standarization: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- EN 518. Structural Timber—Grading—Requirements for Visual Strength Grading Standards; European Committee for Standarization: Brussels, Belgium, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- PN-D-94021-10. Constructional Softwood Sorted by Strength Grading Methods; Polish Committee for Standarization: Warsaw, Poland, 2013. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- EN 14080. Timber Structures-Glued Laminated Timber and Glued Solid Timber—Requirements; European Committee for Standarization: Brussels, Belgium, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Mirski, R.; Kuliński, M.; Dziurka, D.; Thomas, M.; Antonowicz, R. Strength Properties of Structural Glulam Elements from Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Timber Reinforced in the Tensile Zone with Steel and Basalt Rods. Materials
**2021**, 14, 2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Sawn timber arrangement in the manufacture of structural beams (A,B,D,E), C—direction of loading; ((

**a**)—quality in the bend test, (

**b**)—waste timber, unclassified, (

**c**)—visual assessment-class KW, (

**d**)—visual assessment-class KS, (

**e**)—visual assessment-class KG).

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Mirski, R.; Dziurka, D.; Kuliński, M.; Trociński, A.; Kawalerczyk, J.; Antonowicz, R.
Strength Properties of Structural Glulam Manufactured from Pine (*Pinus sylvestris* L.) Side Boards. *Materials* **2021**, *14*, 7312.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237312

**AMA Style**

Mirski R, Dziurka D, Kuliński M, Trociński A, Kawalerczyk J, Antonowicz R.
Strength Properties of Structural Glulam Manufactured from Pine (*Pinus sylvestris* L.) Side Boards. *Materials*. 2021; 14(23):7312.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237312

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Mirski, Radosław, Dorota Dziurka, Marcin Kuliński, Adrian Trociński, Jakub Kawalerczyk, and Ryszard Antonowicz.
2021. "Strength Properties of Structural Glulam Manufactured from Pine (*Pinus sylvestris* L.) Side Boards" *Materials* 14, no. 23: 7312.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237312