Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of Engine Performance for 2nd Generation Biodiesel Derived from Mg2Zr5O12 Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Microstructure of Coal with Different Particle Sizes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Full-Bridge Diode-Clamped Multilevel LLC Resonant Converter Using Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM

1
Railroad Safety Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang-si 16105, Korea
2
Department of Railroad Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Uiwang-si 16106, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(11), 4045; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114045
Submission received: 15 May 2022 / Revised: 30 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 31 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Power Converters)
(This article belongs to the Section F3: Power Electronics)

Abstract

:
A full-bridge diode-clamped multilevel LLC resonant converter suitable for power conversion systems that use high input voltage, such as railway vehicles, is proposed in this paper. In order to eliminate the voltage deviations of the capacitors connected in series to the high voltage input DC link, a novel modulation strategy referred to as multi-neighboring reference vector discontinuous pulse-width modulation (MNRV DPWM) is proposed. Unlike the existing two-level resonant converter that varies the operating frequency to hold the output voltage constant, the proposed multilevel resonant converter modulates the amplitude of the fundamental wave input to a resonance tank while fixing the operating frequency at the resonance point. Therefore, the design of passive elements becomes easier, and stable operation is possible over a wide operating range with only one power conversion stage. In this paper, the control algorithm and operation characteristics of the newly proposed full-bridge diode-clamped four-level LLC resonant converter are analyzed in detail and design guidelines are presented. The feasibility of the proposed converter is verified through a simulation and an experiment with a prototype converter.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Due to excellent soft switching characteristics such as primary-side zero-voltage switching (ZVS) and secondary-side zero-current switching (ZCS), LLC resonant converters are widely used in many areas such as electric vehicles, servers, uninterruptible power supplies, and TV power adapters. Furthermore, with regard to an LLC resonant converter operating at a high switching frequency, the power density can be greatly improved due to the reduction in the size of the passive element [1,2]. However, because the output voltage is controlled through frequency variations, a wide range of frequency sweeps is required in a wide input/load variation system, making it difficult to design optimal passive devices [3]. In addition, because most resonant converters developed thus far are based on a frequency-controlled two-level topology, they are not widely used in high-power systems with very high input voltages, such as railroad vehicles, due to the limited endurance voltage of the switching devices. Currently, as part of the effort to replace the existing low-frequency transformers, resonance topology-based power converters are widely applied to the auxiliary power systems of railway vehicles, with most being composed of two stages. One type is an LLC resonant converter controlled in an open loop with a fixed operating frequency, and the other is a constant-voltage regulator connected before or after the LLC converter, which also serves to provide proper voltage for the normal operation of the LLC resonant converter. This complicates the overall system configuration [4,5].
Meanwhile, multilevel converters have been studied extensively in an effort to overcome the limitations of the two-level topology [6,7,8,9,10]. The multilevel converter, as exemplified by the diode-clamped method, the flying capacitor method, and the cascaded H-bridge, can be applied to a high-voltage, high-power system with devices with low withstand voltages. It also has the advantage of a low harmonic content and low dv/dt generation. Among these three, in a system that receives power from a single external power supply line such as a railroad vehicle, the diode-clamped topology with a simple power stage configuration is suitable. However, with diode-clamped topologies, it is not easy to balance the DC link capacitor voltages to ensure equal voltage sharing and good performance, especially for level four and higher. Over the past three decades, numerous researchers have attempted to find appropriate modulation strategies to solve the voltage balance problem in a three-phase diode-clamped multilevel converter [11,12,13,14]. The addition of an external circuit to compensate for voltage deviations and a hybrid method that utilizes a diode-clamped circuit and a flying capacitor together both complicate the system and are not cost effective [15,16,17]. Recently, the voltage imbalance problem of a three-phase diode-clamped DC/AC inverter with three or more levels was resolved using a virtual vector scheme [18,19,20]. The voltage imbalance was eliminated by combining reference vectors whose associated current sum is zero with the aid of a virtual reference vector. However, in a three-phase system, the amount of calculation is increased because the phase angle as well as the magnitude of the reference voltage must be considered. In addition, it is not easy to find an optimal switching pattern due to the considerable redundancy of the switching pairs. The increased switching loss compared to the general space vector pulse-width modulation (SVPWM) scheme is another issue. Recently, carrier-overlapped PWM (COPWM) applicable to diode-clamped multilevel inverters was proposed [21]. With multiple carrier-based modulation, it can control capacitor voltage deviation while maintaining volt-second balance in a diode-clamped multilevel inverter with four or more levels. However, this method is effective under ideal conditions and requires a little complex closed-loop control under non-ideal conditions and increases switching losses compared to the conventional single-carrier method [22]. As previously discussed, most of the multilevel topologies known to date have been applied to three-phase inverter systems. Therefore, in order to apply the diode-clamped multilevel topology to the single-phase DC/DC converter, a new switching modulation technique is required that can effectively eliminate voltage deviations in series-connected DC link capacitors while simultaneously controlling the output voltage simply in a closed-loop control manner.
A multi-phase, multi-level LLC converter with a two-level topology-based modular structure has been proposed for high-voltage and high-power systems [23]. Because it is based on the existing frequency modulation method, it is difficult to optimally design passive components under wide input/load variation conditions. Additionally, a separate resonance tank is required for each sub-module, increasing the required number of passive elements. A suitable solution for voltage deviation between series-connected DC link capacitors has not been proposed. Input-series-output-parallel (ISOP) topology based on a two-level DAB converter can handle high voltage and high power [24]. However, the ISOP topology requires an additional passive element for each sub-module, which complicates the overall system. An additional control algorithm to guarantee a stable operation and an adequate input voltage distribution is also mandatory.
On the other hand, a fixed-frequency three-level full-bridge LLC resonant converter has been proposed [25]. The output voltage can be controlled by modulating the magnitude of the fundamental wave component of the voltage input to the resonance tank. However, since it does not operate as a typical diode-clamped topology, it is difficult to control because each switch must be duty-controlled separately. In addition, there is no mention of a DC link voltage deviation problem. Although various modulation techniques have been proposed for the LLC resonant converter, a suitable method for a diode-clamped multilevel converter with four levels or more has not yet been reported [26].
Meanwhile, single-phase diode-clamped multilevel AC/DC and DC/AC converters based on MNRV DPWM were proposed recently [27,28]. This MNRV DPWM is characterized by the presence of several adjacent reference vectors with different capacitor charging/discharging characteristics depending on the position of the command voltage in order to offset the voltage deviation of series-connected DC link capacitors and to match the magnitude of the command voltage on average. However, because AC/DC and DC/AC converters use a relatively low fundamental frequency to utilize a commercial grid or drive a motor, they use a relatively high frequency modulation index (mf) to reduce capacitor voltage fluctuations due to the limited capacitance. To apply this MNRV DPWM to a DC/DC converter, some modifications of the modulation strategy are required, as in [29].
Based on [29], this paper presents a novel switching modulation scheme suitable for single-phase full-bridge diode-clamped multilevel LLC resonant converters with an addition of detailed circuit analysis, various types according to the carrier deformation, loss analysis, and experimental results. By using the linear amplitude modulation characteristics of the proposed diode-clamped multilevel converter, an LLC resonant converter based on voltage amplitude modulation with a fixed switching frequency at the resonant point is proposed, thus enabling an optimal passive device design and ensuring stable operation over a wide operating range. In addition, capacitor voltage deviation compensation is implemented using only mf = 2 owing to the high fundamental switching frequency of the DC/DC converter. The proposed method utilizes only the clamped switching pair based on DPWM to facilitate the design of the switching pattern and reduce the switching losses. This paper briefly introduces a modified MNRV DPWM suitable for DC/DC converters, analyzes the operating characteristics of the proposed voltage-magnitude-modulation-based diode-clamped multilevel LLC resonant converter, and presents design guidelines. In addition, various types of LLC resonant converters are examined according to the deformation of the carrier. The performance and feasibility of the proposed converter are verified through simulations and experiments.

2. General Approach: Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM (MNRV DPWM)

Figure 1 shows the circuit diagram of the single-phase diode-clamped four-level PWM converter. The AC voltage source VS supplies input power to the full-bridge switching stack through boost inductor LB with an equivalent series resistance of RB. The full-bridge switching stage is composed of the switches QA1~QA6 and QB1~QB6 and the clamping diodes DA1~DA6 and DB1~DB6. The output DC link stage consists of three series-connected capacitors, Cdc1, Cdc2, and Cdc3. RL implies output load resistance.
Figure 2a shows the switching pairs of A and B legs and the capacitor charging/discharging status according to the position of the command voltage VC* of the single-phase diode-clamped four-level PWM converter. In the full-bridge four-level topology, 0, E, 2E, and 3E imply reference vectors representing each step voltage that can be output as a leg-to-leg voltage. The numbers in parentheses refer to switching pairs (AB) that can express the reference vectors, and C and D positioned to the right of them are the charging and discharging states of the capacitor, respectively. For example, if VC* is located at ②, in carrier-based sinusoidal pulse-width modulation (CB-SPWM), adjacent reference vectors are E and 2E, and (AB) expressing E has redundancy via (10), (21), and (32). With regard to (10), the charging/discharging state of the three capacitors connected in series as the top capacitor (Cdc1), intermediate capacitor (Cdc2), and bottom capacitor (Cdc3) is DDC, which means that that Cdc1 and Cdc2 are discharging and Cdc3 is charging. For CB-PWM, which is widely used in single-phase AC/DC converters, two reference vectors adjacent to VC* are selected and their duration is adjusted to satisfy the magnitude of VC* and generate a symmetrical PWM pattern to minimize the ripple, as shown in Figure 2b. However, from level 4 or higher, a voltage imbalance inevitably occurs due to the limited selectable reference vectors capable of actively controlling the charging/discharging state of the capacitors. In particular, when the unity power factor is controlled as in the PWM converter, the voltage of the middle capacitor among the capacitors constituting the DC link stage is excessively charged compared to the other capacitors. This occurs because the charging/discharging behavior cannot be actively controlled with only two adjacent reference vectors.
When (AB) is (20), (30), and (31), the capacitor charging/discharging states are DCC, CCC, and CCD, respectively, and it can be confirmed that Cdc2 is always in the charged state. In particular, for a PWM converter in which the phase difference between VC* and the input current is small, the capacitor charging current is largest when VC* is located in ① (large vector region (LRV)); moreover, even if VC* is located in different regions such as ② and ③ (the small vector region (SVR)), this overcharged state is not overcome, and the voltage deviation intensifies. Due to the characteristics of the diode-clamped multilevel converter, if the switching state is implemented by selecting two adjacent vectors as in the conventional CB-SPWM, the voltage deviation of the capacitor cannot be eliminated. Figure 3 shows the voltage imbalance problem of the PWM converter when applying CB-SPWM. VS is the input voltage source; IS is the input current; and Vdc1, Vdc2, and Vdc3 are the terminal voltages of Cdc1, Cdc2, and Cdc3, respectively. VAB is the switching leg voltage. As expected, the middle capacitor voltage Vdc2 increases continually after applying CB-SPWM.
Meanwhile, total harmonic distortion (THD) of the switching leg voltage VAB was analyzed under the following conditions of VS = 220Vrms(60 Hz ac), output voltage Vdc = 500 V, output power PO = 30 kW, source frequency fS = 60 Hz, mf = 55, LB = 4 mH, and RB = 1 mΩ. THD results were 0.23 and 0.43 for the CB-SPWM and the proposed MNRV DPWM, respectively, which reveals the much-increased high-frequency harmonic components of VAB in the proposed method. However, the CB-SPWM-based multilevel converter corresponds to an ideal case that is difficult to implement in practice due to a voltage imbalance problem. When compared with the existing two-level converter, the THD value of MNRV DPWM was reduced by 0.15. On the other hand, the multilevel topology enables the use of the low withstand voltage devices with lower switching losses than higher withstand voltage devices. Therefore, in the proposed method, switching frequency can be further increased, thereby reducing the size of filter for harmonic reduction and facilitating its design.
In order to solve the voltage deviation problem of the single-phase diode-clamped multilevel converter, MNRV DPWM was proposed [27]. Figure 2c shows the reference vectors selected according to the location of VC* and the switching pairs that can represent them, also showing the capacitor charging and discharging states according to the clamping mode (CM). When VC* is located in LVR, E, 2E, and 3E are selected as reference vectors. If E is selected, which was not chosen in CB-SPWM, (10) and (32) can be utilized, and these switching pairs can serve to discharge C2 (DDC, CDD). Therefore, if E is used as a reference vector along with 2E and 3E, the voltage increase of C2 can be suppressed, and if the duration times of reference vectors E, 2E, and 3E are properly adjusted, the magnitude of VC* can be tracked on average. In this paper, to reduce the switching redundancy and minimize the switching loss, the clamped switching states in ±180° DPWM are employed [30]. This means that only (3×), (×3), (0×), and (×0) are used among all switching pairs that can represent the reference vectors. (3×) and (×3) indicate that legs A or B, respectively, are clamped with a positive DC rail, called the upper clamping mode (UCM), where CM = 1. Similarly, (0×) and (×0) indicate the clamping of legs A or B, respectively, to the negative DC rail, called the lower clamping mode (LCM), where CM = −1. The generation of multiple references to eliminate voltage deviations among DC link capacitors in [21] is similar to the proposed method. However, MNRV DPWM is used, since VC* is clamped to the positive or negative DC rail during every half cycle, resulting in the advantage of reducing the switching redundancy and minimizing the switching loss. Meanwhile, in the UCM and LCM, the symmetry of the charging and discharging patterns for the same reference vector are horizontally opposite to each other. For example, (31) and (20) are switching pairs expressing reference vector 2E in the UCM and LCM, respectively, but the capacitor charging/discharging patterns are symmetric in those opposite to each other as CCD and DCC. As a symmetrical characteristic, the charging/discharging characteristics when VC* is negative are identical to the case when VC* is positive.
The procedure for calculating the duration time of the MNRV based on the reduced capacitor voltage deviation is as follows. First, Vdc1, Vdc2, and Vdc3 are input. Between Vdc1 and Vdc3, which are the top and bottom capacitor voltages, respectively, we select a voltage with a large absolute difference from the reference value, Vdc_ref/3, which is the target voltage of the unit capacitor. If the selected voltage is Vdc1 and Vdc_ref/3 − Vdc1 is greater than zero, the UCM is selected. On the other hand, if the difference is less than zero, the LCM is selected. If the selected voltage is Vdc3 and Vdc_ref/3 − Vdc3 is greater than zero, we select the LCM, and if the difference is less than zero, we select the UCM, because when the charging/discharging behavior of the capacitor according to CM is analyzed, for the UCM, Vdc1 tends to increase and Vdc3 decrease, and vice versa in the LCM. When CM is selected, the compensation controller calculates the duty compensation values for the reference vectors proportional to the voltage deviations among the capacitors. In a four-level converter, three capacitors and two voltage-deviation compensators are needed. There are several methods for configuring the controllers implementing the two voltage deviation compensators. Here, two controllers, one compensating for the difference between (Vdc1 + Vdc2)/2 and Vdc3 and the other compensating for that between Vdc1 and (Vdc2 + Vdc3)/2, are used. These design methods are natural charging/discharging characteristics of reference voltage vectors and easy to expand to a general high-dimensional multilevel converter.
As shown in Equation (1), the two compensation controllers output dcomp12_3 and dcomp1_23, which are used to compensate for the voltage difference between (Vdc1 + Vdc2)/2 and Vdc3 and the voltage difference between Vdc1 and (Vdc2 + Vdc3)/2, respectively. In Equation (1), KP and KI mean the proportional and integral gains of the PI controller, respectively. According to the position of VC* and CM, the duties of the each MNRV are calculated as follows. If VC* belongs to the LVR, we select E, 2E, and 3E as the MNRV. Here, with E as a basic vector for the duty calculation, the duties of the E, 2E, and 3E vectors are calculated as Equation (2). Here, dE, d2E, and d3E are the duties of E, 2E, and 3E, respectively. VE, V2E, and V3E are the voltage levels of E, 2E, and 3E, respectively, meaning Vdc_ref/3, Vdc_ref∙2/3, and Vdc_ref. Equation (2) is applied differently depending on CM, and its meaning is as follows. The duties of the MNRVs must basically satisfy the magnitude of VC*. At the same time, the voltage deviations among all capacitors are reduced by applying two controller outputs (dcomp12_3 and dcomp1_23) differently according to CM. For example, if (Vdc1 + Vdc2)/2 > Vdc3 in the UCM, dcomp12_3 increases and d2E decreases. In the UCM, d2E is the duty of the switching pair (31), which serves to increase Vdc1 and Vdc2 and decrease Vdc3. Therefore, Vdc1 and Vdc2 decrease and Vdc3 increases due to the reduced d2E. According to the negative feedback, dcomp12_3 is stabilized and the capacitor voltage deviations are also reduced. The same can be explained in the LCM. Using the previously calculated duties of each reference vector, the PWM command values of each of the switches in the LRV are determined via Equation (3). Here, Nmax refers to the maximum value at the period of a single carrier considering the DSP implementation. For a positive VC*, leg A is clamped to the positive DC rail in the UCM and leg B is clamped to the negative DC rail in the LCM.
d c o m p 12 _ 3 = K P ( V d c 1 + V d c 2 2 V d c 3 ) + K I 0 t ( V d c 1 + V d c 2 2 V d c 3 ) d t , d c o m p 1 _ 23 = K P ( V d c 1 V d c 2 + V d c 3 2 ) + K I 0 t ( V d c 1 V d c 2 + V d c 3 2 ) d t .
L V R @ U C M L V R @ L C M d 2 E = d E d c o m p 12 _ 3 , d 2 E = d E + d c o m p 1 _ 23 , d 3 E = 1 d E d 2 E , d 3 E = 1 d E d 2 E , V C = V E d E + V 2 E d 2 E + V 3 E d 3 E , V C = V E d E + V 2 E d 2 E + V 3 E d 3 E , d E = V C + d c o m p 12 _ 3 ( V 2 E V 3 E ) V 3 E V E + V 2 E 2 V 3 E , d E = V C d c o m p 1 _ 23 ( V 2 E V 3 E ) V 3 E V E + V 2 E 2 V 3 E .
L V R @ U C M P W M _ C M D _ A 1 P W M _ C M D _ A 2 P W M _ C M D _ A 3 = N max 1 1 1 ,   P W M _ C M D _ B 1 P W M _ C M D _ B 2 P W M _ C M D _ B 3 = N max 0 d E d E + d 2 E , L V R @ L C M P W M _ C M D _ A 1 P W M _ C M D _ A 2 P W M _ C M D _ A 3 = N max d 3 E d 2 E + d 3 E 1 ,   P W M _ C M D _ B 1 P W M _ C M D _ B 2 P W M _ C M D _ B 3 = 0 0 0 .
On the other hand, when VC* is located in the SVR, 0, E, 2E, and 3E are selected as reference vectors for a similar principle. To achieve a smooth transition at the moment of a region change, the range of the reference vectors in SVR must be wider than that of the LVR to increase the common reference vectors between the LVR and SVR. Each duty is calculated as in Equation (4). Here, d0 is the duty of the 0 vector. Using the calculated duties of each reference vector, the PWM command values of each of the switches in the SRV are determined as in Equation (5).
Using the symmetric characteristic of the full-bridge topology, the duties of the MNRVs when VC* is negative are determined to be identical to those in the positive VC* case except for the interchange of legs A and B.
S V R @ U C M S V R @ L C M d 2 E = d 3 E d c o m p 12 _ 3 , d 2 E = d 3 E + d c o m p 1 _ 23 , d E = d 3 E d c o m p 1 _ 23 , d E = d 3 E + d c o m p 12 _ 3 , d 0 = 1 d E d 2 E d 3 E , d 0 = 1 d E d 2 E d 3 E , V C = V 0 d 0 + V E d E + V 2 E d 2 E + V 3 E d 3 E , V C = V 0 d 0 + V E d E + V 2 E d 2 E + V 3 E d 3 E , d 3 E = V C + d c o m p 1 _ 23 V E + d c o m p 12 _ 3 V 2 E V E + V 2 E + V 3 E , d 3 E = V C d c o m p 12 _ 3 V E d c o m p 1 _ 23 V 2 E V E + V 2 E + V 3 E .
S V R @ U C M P W M _ C M D _ A 1 P W M _ C M D _ A 2 P W M _ C M D _ A 3 = N max 1 1 1 ,   P W M _ C M D _ B 1 P W M _ C M D _ B 2 P W M _ C M D _ B 3 = N max d 0 d 0 + d E d 0 + d E + d 2 E , S V R @ L C M P W M _ C M D _ A 1 P W M _ C M D _ A 2 P W M _ C M D _ A 3 = N max d 3 E d 2 E + d 3 E d E + d 2 E + d 3 E ,   P W M _ C M D _ B 1 P W M _ C M D _ B 2 P W M _ C M D _ B 3 = 0 0 0 .
The MNRV DPWM applied to a single-phase diode-clamped four-level converter can be expanded to a general diode-clamped N-level converter as follows. Based on the analysis of the voltage fluctuation characteristics of the DC link capacitors of the reference step voltage vectors, appropriate MNRVs are selected according to the position of VC* and the capacitor voltage deviation compensation parameters are designed. MNRV selections applied to the five-level, six-level, and general N-level diode-clamped topologies are shown in Figure 4.
The general rule for selecting MNRVs according to the VC* position is as follows. Compensation parameters for controlling the voltage deviations of capacitors are N − 2 in the N − level case. First, the charging/discharging states of the capacitors according to the reference step voltage are analyzed as follows. In the N-level case, the maximum step voltage is (N − 1)∙E, and the capacitor charging/discharging state is CC…CC regardless of CM. Because all capacitors are charged with the same amount of current, there is no voltage deviation. The step voltage one step lower is (N − 2)∙E and the capacitor charging/discharging states are CC…CD and DC…CC in the UCM and LCM, respectively. The outermost capacitor is changed to the discharge mode. In the UCM, the capacitor located at the bottom of the DC link stage, and in the LCM, the capacitor located at the top of the DC link stage, change from charging to discharging mode. The next step voltage is (N − 3)∙E, and the capacitor charging/discharging states are CC…CDD and DDC…CC in the UCM and LCM, respectively. That is, whenever the step voltage decreases by one step, it can be seen that the capacitor charging/discharging states change from charging to discharging from the lower end of the DC link stage in the UCM and from the upper end of the DC link stage in the LCM. Applying this to all step voltages, the following rule can be found. The total number of different charging/discharging states of capacitors is 2(N − 2). At this time, there are step voltage pairs in which the sum of two step voltages is (N − 1)∙E, and the capacitor charging/discharging states in the UCM and LCM of these two step voltages are related to the same capacitor voltage compensation parameters with opposite signs. The two step voltages in this case are cross oppositely coupled to each other; therefore, there are N−2 independent capacitor charging/discharging states in the overall step voltage. Thus, N−2 independent dcomp parameters can be generated, i.e., dcomp1_2...(N−1), dcomp12_3...(N−1),..., dcomp1...(N−2)_(N−1). In order to control the capacitor voltage deviation completely regardless of the position of VC*, the MNRV should be selected so that all independent compensation parameters are included. For every VC* location, it is sufficient to set the MNRV such that N−2 independent duty compensation parameters are included in order to eliminate the voltage deviations of all capacitors. However, large fluctuations in the duty compensation value may adversely affect normal operation; i.e., the duty of a particular reference vector can be negative or greater than one due to the addition of duty-compensation parameters. Accordingly, it is better to include all different charging/discharging states of the capacitors for more reliable operation by limiting the duty-compensation effort. Including all capacitor charging and discharging states is good for stable operation but increases the switching losses. However, as will be described later, by designing an appropriate carrier, a voltage-deviation-compensation operation may occur in the ZVS region, thereby minimizing an increase in the switching loss. Because the outermost vectors (0, (N − 1)∙E) do not affect the capacitor voltage deviation, the capacitor-voltage-deviation-compensation parameters are designed from independent capacitor charging/discharging states of the remaining intermediate reference vectors.
In the five-level case, for example, there are three independent charging/discharging states: CDDD(DCCC), CCDD(DDCC), and CCCD(DDDC). The capacitor charging/discharging states of the reference voltages E in the UCM and 3E in the LCM are CDDD and DCCC, respectively. They both can be used to control the voltage deviation between Vdc1 and (Vdc2 + Vdc3 + Vdc4)/3. It can be seen that the charging/discharging states of 2E in the UCM and LCM are CCDD and DDCC, respectively, and are related to the voltage deviations between (Vdc1 + Vdc2)/2 and (Vdc3 + Vdc4)/2. Similarly, the charge/discharge states of 3E in the UCM and E in the LCM are CCCD and DDDC, respectively, and they can be utilized to control the voltage deviation between (Vdc1 + Vdc2 + Vdc3)/3 and Vdc4 with opposite signs. Therefore, in the five-level case, three independent compensation parameters are required to control the capacitor voltage deviation: dcomp1_234, dcomp12_34, and dcomp123_4. They are related to the voltage differences between Vdc1 and (Vdc2 + Vdc3 + Vdc4)/3, (Vdc1 + Vdc2)/2 and (Vdc3 + Vdc4)/2, and (Vdc1 + Vdc2 + Vdc3)/3 and Vdc4, respectively. Therefore, if VC* belongs to the LVR, the range of the MNRV should be E ~ 4E in order to utilize all six different charging/discharging states of the capacitors. On the other hand, if VC* is located in the SVR, the MNRV range should be 0 ~ 3E for the same reason. In addition, when VC* moves between the LVR and SVR, the duties of the reference voltage vectors may suddenly change, which is a factor that degrades the linearity of the output voltage. Therefore, in order to minimize duty changes of the reference voltage vectors and thus ensure smooth transitions between the LRV and SRV, the minimum reference voltage in the LVR and the maximum reference voltage in the SVR should be selected as the basic vector for the MNRV.
In this way, by selecting the MNRV according to the positions of VC* and designing compensation parameters for the deviations of the capacitor voltages, extension to a high-dimensional N-level diode-clamped converter is possible. For a general N-level case, the LRV and SRV range from roundup{(N − 1)/2}∙E to (N − 1)∙E and from 0 to roundup{(N − 1)/2}∙E, respectively. The corresponding MNRVs are from E to (N − 1)∙E and from 0 to (N − 2)∙E, as shown in Figure 4. It should be noted that thus far MNRV DPWM has been described based on the incoming current to the switching legs, as in a PWM converter. Therefore, the charging/discharging states and CM selection should be reversed in DC/DC owing to the reversed reference current direction.

3. Proposed Full-Bridge Diode-Clamped Four-Level LLC Resonant Converter

Circuit and Control Algorithm for the Proposed Diode-Clamped 4-Level LLC Resonant Converter

Figure 5 shows the circuit of the proposed full-bridge diode-clamped four-level LLC resonant converter. The voltage source Vdc supplies input power through the DC link stage composed of three series-connected capacitors, Cdc1, Cdc2, and Cdc3. The full-bridge switching stage is composed of the switches QA1~QA6 and QB1~QB6, and the clamping diodes DA1~DA6 and DB1~DB6 that connect the unit step capacitor voltages of the DC link stage to each switching node. The resonance tank stage composed of resonant inductor Lr, resonant capacitor Cr, and magnetizing inductor Lm receives voltage amplitude modulated sag-type voltage with a fixed frequency from switching leg voltage Vleg(=VAB = VAVB). The resonant current ILr charges the output capacitor CO through an n:1:1 center-tapped transformer and the output rectification stage composed of diodes DO1 and DO2 and supplies power to the load RL.
AC/DC or DC/AC converters have a relatively high mf to reduce the harmonic components and to control the fundamental component on average during one fundamental period. However, in a DC/DC converter, it is desirable to increase the frequency of the AC switching pulse until it is within an acceptable switching loss range to reduce the size of the passive element. Given that such a high fundamental frequency increases the number of compensations for capacitor voltage deviation during the unit time, MNRV DPWM for a DC/DC converter can be implemented with small mf, i.e., mf = 2. A DC/DC converter to which MNRV DPWM is applied can also linearly modulate the magnitude of the reference voltage akin to a multilevel inverter. Therefore, when applied to a resonant converter, the output voltage can be controlled by modulating the magnitude of VC* while fixing the frequency to the resonance point. This simplifies the design of the passive components compared to those in conventional frequency-swept resonant converters.
The control block diagram of the proposed MNRV DPWM-based diode-clamped four-level LLC resonant converter is shown in Figure 6. The output Vampl of the constant-voltage controller is multiplied by a pulse that swings between 1 and −1 at a rate of 50% with switching frequency fsw to obtain pulse-shaped command voltage VC*. Here, fsw is designed as the resonance frequency (fr = 1/[2π∙(LrCr)0.5]) for maximum efficiency. CM is set to be between 1 and −1, referring to the UCM and LCM, respectively, according to Vdc1 and Vdc3. In order to remove the voltage deviations among the capacitors, Vdc1, Vdc2, and Vdc3 are input to the PI controller to calculate the duty compensation parameters (dcomp1_23, dcomp12_3). According to the position of VC*, appropriate MNRVs are selected and the duration times of each reference vectors are calculated, with the PWM CMDs of the A and B legs finally output. These values are compared to the triangular carrier to determine the on/off status of every upper switch in the A and B legs. According to the complementary rule of the diode-clamped topology, the on/off statuses of the lower switches are determined as opposite to the corresponding upper switches’ on/off states in the same leg. QA1 and QA4, QA2 and QA5, and QA3 and QA6 are the complementary switch pairs in leg A. The same applies to leg B.

4. Analysis

4.1. Overall Operation Characteristics of the Proposed Converter

In this section, we analyze the operation mode of the proposed diode-clamped four-level resonant LLC converter. The operation state of the circuit is largely classified according to CM. Figure 7 shows the circuit operation status in the UCM and LCM, and (AB) on the right side of each circuit represents the switching status of the A and B phases. The shaded red line in the figure represents the current path flowing through the channel or body diode of the conducting switches. Except for (30), (03), (33), and (00), the magnitude and direction of the current flowing through the series-connected capacitors Cdc1, Cdc2, and Cdc3 differ depending on the switching pattern as follows. In the switching pairs of (31) and (13), the charging/discharging state is DDC, and in (32) and (23) the charging/discharging state is DCC. In (20) and (02) the charging/discharging state is CDD, and in (10) and (01) the charging/discharging state is CCD. Therefore, it is expected that a voltage deviation will occur because the charging/discharging patterns of each capacitor differ depending on the duration of the specific switching pair. Here, the amount of charging/discharging current flowing through each capacitor is related to ILr. If there are two capacitors connected in series, the charging/discharging current becomes 1/3 × ILr, and if there is one capacitor, it becomes 2/3 × ILr. For example, for (32), Cdc1 is discharged with a current of 2/3 × ILr and Cdc2 and Cdc3 are charged with 1/3 × ILr. The core principle of MNRV DPWM is to set several reference vectors, including all independent charging/discharging characteristics of DC link capacitors depending on the location of VC*, and adjust their duration time to reduce the voltage deviations of the capacitors and to satisfy the magnitude of VC* on average at the same time.
Figure 8 depicts the equivalent circuit of the resonance tank at the resonance point. Regardless of CM, when VC* > 0, one from among Vdc, 2/3 × Vdc, and 1/3 × Vdc is applied to Vleg, and nVO is applied to the magnetizing inductor Lm. When the voltage of VlegnVO is supplied to Lr-Cr, ILr and ILm increase in the positive direction. Meanwhile, when VC* < 0, one from among −Vdc, −2/3 × Vdc, and −1/3 × Vdc is applied to Vleg and −nVO is applied to Lm. ILr and ILm decrease by Vleg + nVO supplied to Lr-Cr.
Based on this circuit operation state, Figure 9 shows the main operating waveforms of the proposed full-bridge diode-clamped four-level LLC resonant converter. CM is determined as the UCM or LCM according to the characteristics of the capacitor voltage deviation at the start of one switching period. Here, it is assumed that the converter is operated in the UCM for one cycle and operated in the LCM during the next cycle in a steady state. The operation during one cycle is a series of symmetrical half-cycle operations, and the operation during the half-cycle is divided into six modes.

4.1.1. Operation under the UCM

Mode 1 [t0,t1]: At t0, CM is changed from the LCM to the UCM; the A leg upper switches QA1, QA2, and QA3 are all turned on with the ZVS condition owing to the negative current of ILr, and the B leg upper switches QB1, QB2, and QB3 are all turned off. Vleg with Vdc is input to the resonance tank stage, and the resonance current ILr formed by Lr and Cr is transferred to the secondary side of the transformer; DO1 then conducts, and the output voltage VO multiplied by the turn ratio of n is applied to Lm. At this time, the switching state is (30), and the currents flowing through Cdc1, Cdc2, and Cdc3 are all identical to IdcILr; here, Idc is the outgoing current of Vdc such that voltage deviations do not occur in the capacitor. This mode is terminated at t1 when QB6 turns off (when QB3 turns on). In mode 1, resonant current ILr and resonant voltage VCr are determined by Equation (6). Here, Vleg is Vdc and ILr(0) and VCr(0) refer to the initial values of ILr and VCr at t0, respectively. The characteristic impedance Z equals (Lr/Cr)0.5, and the angular frequency ω is 2πfr.
I L r ( t ) = I L r ( 0 ) cos ω t + V l e g n V o V C r ( 0 ) Z sin ω t , V C r ( t ) = Z I L r ( 0 ) sin ω t + [ V l e g n V o V C r ( 0 ) ] ( 1 cos ω t ) + V C r ( 0 ) .
Mode 2 [t1,t2]: When QB6 is off at t1, the switching state becomes (31), and Cdc1 and Cdc2 are discharged with a current of 1/3 × ILr and Cdc3 is charged with a current of 2/3 × ILr. Vleg becomes 2/3 × Vdc, and the voltage applied to Lr-Cr is changed from Vdc to 2/3 × Vdc; thus, the slope of ILr changes. Lm is still charged with nVO due to the conduction of DO1. This mode continues until QB5 turns off at t2. In mode 2, ILr and VCr are also determined by Equation (6), except for Vleg = 2/3 × Vdc, and ILr(0) and VCr(0) are changed to ILr(t1) and VCr(t1), respectively.
Mode 3 [t2,t3]: When QB5 is turned off at t2, the switching state is (32); accordingly, Cdc1 is discharged with a current of 2/3 × ILr, and Cdc2 and Cdc3 are charged with a current of 1/3 × ILr. Because Vleg is changed from 2/3 × Vdc to 1/3 × Vdc, the slope of the ILr also changes. Lm is still charged with nVO. This mode ends when QB5 is turned on at t3. In mode 3, ILr and VCr are also determined by Equation (6), except for Vleg = 1/3 × Vdc, and ILr(0) and VCr(0) are changed to ILr(t2) and VCr(t2), respectively.
Mode 4 [t3,t4]: When QB5 is turned on at t3, the switching state is (31) again, and operation in this mode is identical to that in mode 2. This mode ends when QB6 turns on at t4.
Mode 5 [t4,t5]: When QB6 is turned on at t4, the switching state is (30), and operation in this mode is identical to that in mode 1. This mode is terminated when ILr equals ILm at t5. At the end of this mode, DO1 is turned off with the ZCS condition.
Mode 6 [t5,t6]: At t5, ILr = ILm, the primary and the secondary sides of the transformer are separated, and the resonance period becomes longer due to the large inductance of Lm contributing to the resonance. This mode continues until the polarity of VC* becomes negative. In mode 6, ILr and VCr are determined by Equation (7). Here, Vleg is Vdc and ILr(0) and VCr(0) refer to the initial values of ILr and VCr at t5, respectively. The characteristic impedance Z’ equals [(Lr + Lm)/Cr]0.5, and the angular frequency ω’ is 1/[(Lr + Lm)∙Cr]0.5.
I L r ( t ) = I L r ( 0 ) cos ω t + V l e g V C r ( 0 ) Z sin ω t V C r ( t ) = Z I L r ( 0 ) sin ω t + [ V l e g V C r ( 0 ) ] ( 1 cos ω t ) + V C r ( 0 )
Due to the symmetry of the DC/DC converter, operation during the remaining half cycle where VC* is negative can easily be inferred from the previous positive half cycle of VC*; accordingly, a description thereof will be omitted. Regarding the capacitor charging and discharging status, in the UCM, Vdc1 continues to discharge and Vdc3 continues to charge regardless of the polarity of VC*. Therefore, under actual operating conditions, the UCM is selected when Vdc1 > Vdc3.

4.1.2. Operation under the LCM

When VC* changes from negative to positive again, one cycle of LCM operation begins. Operation in the LCM has cross-symmetric duality with that of the UCM as follows. When QA(m)/QB(m) is turned on/off in the UCM, QB(7-m)/QA(7-m) is turned on/off in the LCM at the same timing, where m = 1, 2, ..., 6. That is, the turn on/off timing of switch pairs QA1 and QB6, QA2 and QB5, QA3 and QB4, QA4 and QB3, QA5 and QB2, and QA6 and QB1, located in cross-opposite directions, are correspondingly matched. Thus, when the A/B leg is clamped to the positive DC rail in the UCM, the B/A leg is clamped to the negative DC rail in the LCM at the same timing. This duality can be confirmed by examining Figure 7 and Figure 9, and thus a detailed description of operation in the LCM is skipped here to save space.
In the LCM, Vdc3 continues to discharge and Vdc1 continues to charge regardless of the polarity of VC*. Therefore, under actual operating conditions, the LCM is selected when Vdc1 < Vdc3.

4.2. Voltage Transfer Gain

In this section, the input–output voltage transfer gain M is derived through a fundamental harmonic analysis (FHA) [31]. Figure 10 shows the Vleg waveform when 1/3 × Vdc ≤ |VC*| < 2/3 × Vdc. For convenience of the calculation, the original sag-type Vleg is divided into a square-wave swinging at ±Vdc with full duty and three square waves with the opposite phase, swinging at ±Vdc/3 during angular sections [π/2 ± α], [π/2 ± β], and [π/2 ± γ], respectively. The fundamental component is analyzed as Equation (8).
V l e g F = 4 π V d c 4 π V d c 3 ( sin α + sin β + sin γ )
Here, α, β, and γ are given by Equation (9). On the other hand, if 2/3 × Vdc ≤ |VC*|, γ becomes 0, as shown in Figure 9.
α = 0.5 π ( d 0 + d E + d 2 E ) , β = 0.5 π ( d 0 + d E ) , γ = 0.5 π d 0
The fundamental component is reduced compared to the full duty square wave due to the voltage sag section, as shown in Equation (10). Here, k = Lm/Lr, Q = Z/Rac, and Rac = 8n2RL2. The length of the sag section is related to the duty of the MNRV, which is also related to VC*. This means that even if the frequency is fixed, the output voltage can be adjusted by changing VC*. This is a distinguishing feature of the voltage modulation method used in MNRV DPWM compared to the conventional two-level resonant converter using the frequency modulation method.
| M | = n V O V d c = 1 sin α + sin β + sin γ 3 1 + 1 k { 1 f r f 2 } 2 + Q ( f f r f r f ) 2

5. Design Guideline

5.1. Design of the Resonant Tank

The proposed converter regulates the output voltage by modulating the magnitude of Vleg while fixing the operating frequency to the resonance point. Therefore, the voltage gain range can be determined from the length of the voltage sag section in the normal operating range as shown in Equation (10). If the load increases while the output voltage is fixed, the DC link capacitors’ charging/discharging current increases and the duty compensation effort must be increased. Therefore, the period of the voltage sag section may be out of the normal range and may no longer be able to undertake voltage compensation. With fixed Vdc and VO values, dE decreases as n increases. At this time, if the load increases, dE may have an abnormal value due to the increased duty compensation parameters; therefore, n must be appropriately designed considering the sag section under the maximum load condition. When n is determined, a Q factor must be selected. A high Q implies a large Lr and small Cr, leading to a large reactor size and increased withstand voltage in Cr. On the other hand, if Q is decreased, the shape of the resonance current deviates from a sinusoidal wave, increasing the root mean square (RMS) value of ILr. Thus, an appropriate value must be selected. Cr is determined as Cr = 1/(2π∙frQRac), and Lr is determined by Lr = 1/[(2π∙fr)2Cr]. Lm is selected by determining the ratio k between Lm and Lr. Reducing Lm ensures ZVS operation while increasing circulating current and switch losses. Conversely, a large Lm reduces circulating current and switch losses, but ZVS operation may not be guaranteed. In addition, Lm affects the voltage gain in the region other than the resonance point. Therefore, an appropriate value of Lm must be selected.

5.2. Resonant Current and Voltage

In this section, the peak resonant current ILr_pk and voltage VCr_pk are calculated in order to select an appropriate device by determining the rated switch current and the withstand voltage of the resonance capacitor. When operating at the resonance point, ILr and ILm are in a steady state, as shown in Figure 11. Here, it is assumed that ILr and VCr are sinusoidal for convenience of calculation, as in Equation (11). The initial phase difference ϕ between the ILr and Vleg waveforms is determined as Equation (12). From the observation that the difference between ILr and ILm during a half cycle is equal to the output current divided by n, ILr_pk is determined to be Equation (13) [2]. ILr_pk is proportional to the load current and inversely proportional to Lm. This is consistent with the fact that as the Lm value decreases, the RMS value of ILr increases with the increased circulating current. From the energy balance principle, VCr_pk is calculated as Equation (14).
I L r ( t ) = I L r _ p k sin ( ω t ϕ )
ϕ = sin 1 n V O T 4 I L r _ p k L m
I L r _ p k = I O n 4 R L 2 f r 2 L m 2 + 4 π 2 4 n
V C r _ p k = I L r _ p k Z

5.3. Input and Output Capacitances

The input DC link capacitances can be calculated from the charging/discharging current of the capacitor and the duration time of the voltage sag period. MNRV DPWM determines the duration time of the reference vector to satisfy the magnitude of VC* on average during the unit switching period, as shown in Figure 12. Therefore, the relationship among α, β, and VC* can be derived as in Equation (15) (assuming γ = 0 when |VC*| ≥ 2/3 × Vdc).
In addition, given that the duty compensation parameters in the steady state are very small, we can assume that dE = d2E and α = 2β. The input–output voltage relationship of Equation (10) at the resonance point can be simplified as Equation (16) in a high VC* case where α and β are small, and α can be expressed as Equation (17). Thus, dE can be derived via Equation (18).
V C = V d c 2 V d c 3 π ( α + β ) = V d c ( 1 α π )
V d c = n V O 1 sin α + sin β 3 n V O 1 α 2
α = 2 ( 1 n V O V d c )
d E = 1 V C V d c = α π = 2 π ( 1 n V O V d c )
Figure 13 describes the characteristics of the voltage change of the input DC link capacitors in the LCM. From Equation (19), the increment ΔVdc1 during the unit half cycle, which equals decrement ΔVdc3, is related to Cdc, fsw, ILr_pk, α, β, and ϕ. When the target voltage fluctuation amount ΔVdc,target is determined, the Cdc value is given as in Equation (20) using the previously obtained values of ILr_pk, α, β, and ϕ. If CM alternates between the UCM and LCM at every resonant period in a steady state, the total voltage change per unit capacitor becomes 2 × ΔVdc.
Δ V d c 1 = Δ V d c 3 = 1 C d c [ T 4 0.5 ( d E + d 2 E ) T 2 T 4 0.5 d E T 2 2 3 I L r _ p k sin ( ω t ϕ ) d t + T 4 0.5 d E T 2 T 4 + 0.5 d E T 2 1 3 I L r _ p k sin ( ω t ϕ ) d t + T 4 + 0.5 d E T 2 T 4 + 0.5 ( d E + d 2 E ) T 2 2 3 I L r _ p k sin ( ω t ϕ ) d t ] = I L r _ p k 3 π C d c f S W ( 2 sin α sin β ) cos ϕ
C d c I O V d c , t a r g e t n 4 R L 2 f r 2 L m 2 + 4 π 2 4 n π f r 1 n 2 V O 2 T 2 16 I L r _ p k 2 L m 2 1 n V O V d c
The output capacitor current ICO in the steady state, assuming a continuous current mode, is shown in Figure 14. Because ICO equals the output diode current (IDO1 or IDO2) minus IO, the net charge increment of CO and QCO from t1 and t2, respectively, is calculated using Equation (21). Here, t1 = sin−1(2/π)/ω, t2 = [π-sin−1(2/π)]/ω. Thus, to satisfy the target output voltage fluctuation range ΔVCo,target, CO is determined by Equation (22).
Q C O = t 1 t 2 I C O ( t ) d t = t 1 t 2 I O ( π 2 sin ω t 1 ) d t = 0.105 I O f s w
C O = 0.105 × I O V C o , t a r g e t f r

6. Four Representative Sag Types of Vleg According to the Carrier Deformation

For stable operation of the MNRV DPWM-based full-bridge diode-clamped multilevel resonant converter as described thus far, an appropriate carrier design is required. In DC/DC converters, it is important to maintain the symmetry of the voltage applied to the transformer. In order to maintain the symmetry of Vleg, which is the resonant tank input voltage, the carrier counting direction and initial value must be set appropriately according to CM. Figure 15 shows the representative Vleg that can be implemented according to the carrier deformation. Vleg basically takes the shape of a square wave for maximum power transfer. Additionally, at the middle, edge, or rear of the waveform, taking the form of a stepped sag, i.e., Vdc→2/3 × Vdc→1/3 × Vdc→2/3 × VdcVdc, Vleg decreases and increases again. Compensation for the voltage deviations of the DC link capacitors is performed in that sag section. Depending on the location of the sag, we refer to these as the middle, edge, rear, and end sags, where sag sections occur respectively at the middle, edge, rear, and end of Vleg. In fact, the type described and interpreted thus far corresponds to the middle sag.
Vleg sag types are determined by the initial value and the counting direction of the carrier at the time the UCM and LCM start [29]. For example, when the UCM starts, if the carrier decreases from its maximum value and the carrier increases from its minimum value at the moment the LCM starts, it becomes a middle sag type with a dip in the middle. The remaining sag types can also be implemented by properly designing the initial value and the counting direction of the carrier. In addition to these four types, various Vleg waveforms can be created depending on the shape of the carrier. Each sag type has distinct characteristics. For the middle sag, the compensation ability for voltage deviation is excellent because the voltage-deviation-compensation operation occurs near the peak value of the resonance current, while the switching losses are greatest due to the large switching current. In addition, the sag occurs in the middle of the square wave, which has the greatest influence on the fundamental component of Vleg, meaning that the input CO output voltage transfer gain is low. However, given that the period in which the output diode conducts is the longest, the RMS values of the output diode current and the resonance current are smallest, which is advantageous when conducting a large current. Regarding the edge sag, because the sag section appears at the edge, the ability to compensate for voltage deviations is somewhat lower, but the fundamental component of Vleg is larger than that in the middle sag case. In addition, unlike the middle sag, where all compensation operations for voltage deviation occur under hard switching conditions, the edge sag case can reduce the switching losses because part of the compensation operations for voltage deviation may occur in the ZVS region. The rear sag is characterized as intermediate between the middle sag and the edge sag. All three of these types utilize up and down carriers. On the other hand, the end sag shows the highest efficiency because the number of switching operations is reduced compared to other types because the sag occurs only at the end of the square wave and uses up or down carriers.

7. Simulation and Experiments

7.1. Simulation

To verify the operation of the proposed four-level LLC resonant converter, a simulation was conducted with the conditions shown in Table 1.
Figure 16 presents the simulation results in a steady state for the middle, edge, rear, and end sags. From the top are VC*, CM, GateA, GateB, Vdc, ICdc, ILr, ILm, IDO, VA, VB, IQA_upper, IQA_lower, and IDA. Here, ICdc is the current flowing through each DC link capacitor, and IQA_upper, IQA_lower, and IDA are the upper and lower switch currents and the clamping diode currents for leg A, respectively. Although the currents of the switches and clamping diodes for leg B are not shown here, their characteristics are symmetric with those of leg A.
All four results are consistent with those described above. In a steady state, CM alternates between the UCM and LCM for every cycle. For every half cycle, one leg is clamped with a positive or negative DC rail, and the switch gates of the other leg that is not clamped are turned on/off in a specific pattern determined by the PWM_CMDs and pre-defined carrier according to the sag types. The resonance current generated according to the magnitude of the fundamental component of the Vleg input to the resonance tank is transferred to the secondary side for constant control of the output voltage. In the sag section, voltage deviations among input DC link capacitors are reduced, and when the load or input voltage source changes, instead of sweeping fsw, Vampl changes to control the fundamental component of Vleg.
The voltage transfer gain decreased in the order of the edge, end, rear, and middle sag types. Therefore, the magnitude of VC* required to maintain a constant output voltage under identical conditions was found to be largest at the middle sag, as expected. On the other hand, the RMS values of the output diode and the resonance currents increased in the order of the middle, rear, end, and edge sag types. Owing to the reduced switching number in the end sag case, the overall efficiency was largest for the end sag. The compensation operation for the deviation of the capacitor voltage was performed in three steps during one cycle on average, and the switching step voltage of the four-level converter was lower by one third compared to that of a two-level converter. Therefore, the switching loss of the end sag type was expected to be nearly identical to that of the conventional two-level converter.
Figure 17 shows the loss analysis result of the switching devices according to the sag types when PO = 1000 W. Losses were calculated by means of thermal loss modeling with PLECS software, utilizing the datasheets of the actual devices mentioned in Section 7.2 [32]. Here, Pcond,Q and Psw,Q are conduction and switching losses of the main switches, respectively. Pcond,D and Psw,D are the conduction and switching losses of the clamping diodes, respectively. Lastly, PCond,DO denotes the conduction losses of the output diodes. As expected, the middle sag had largest switching losses compared to the other types while also showing the smallest conduction losses. Considering the winding losses of the magnetic material, it is predicted that the middle sag type would be more advantageous under a heavy load condition.

7.2. Experiments

A prototype circuit (Figure 18) was designed to confirm the operation of the proposed converter and to compare the performance outcomes according to the voltage sag types. The experimental conditions are identical to those in Table 1, except that here PO varied between 500 W and 1500 W. The following devices were used in this experiment. The main switches were Fuji-Electric FGW35N60HD, the clamping diodes were ST-Microelectronic STTH15RQ06-Y, and the output diodes were Vishay VS-HFA06TB120S-M3. The center-tapped transformer had four stacked ferrite cores of the EE6565S with an air gap, and its turn ratio was 47:28:28. The resonant inductor consisted of four stacked ferrite cores of the EE4242S with an air gap. The controller was implemented using TI TMS320F28377D. Increased active switch control, voltage balancing of DC link capacitors, and CM selection increased the amount of computation in the MNRV DPWM compared to conventional two-level converters. Extra logic was also added to handle the clamped PWM CMDs every half cycle and the carrier whose phase is inverted whenever CM changes. It takes a lot of interrupt service routine (ISR) time to set and change the relevant registers of every switching pair that is different from each other. This increased ISR time limits the increase in the switching frequency. In this paper, the PWM switching part was implemented using the embedded ePWM module of the DSP due to the laboratory limitations. In order to overcome this limitation of increasing the switching frequency, it is necessary to implement a PWM switching part by using an FPGA with a parallel operation function and fast processing speed. This allows for a much higher switching frequency than in this experiment.
Figure 19 shows the VA, VB, Vleg, VO, and ILr waveforms according to the voltage sag types when PO = 1500 W. It can be seen that the output voltages held constant at 350 V in all four voltage sag types and that the Vleg values input to the resonance tank differed depending on the sag type, showing unique resonance current shapes. In addition, the selection of CM differed according to the magnitudes of Vdc1 and Vdc3. On the other hand, the RMS value of ILr was lowest in the middle sag case because the conduction time of the output diode was longest for that sag type. However, because the voltage transfer gain was lowest in the middle sag case, the length of d3E was longest for the middle sag at a higher Vampl, whereas for the edge and end sags, it was conversely short.
Figure 20 and Figure 21 show the waveforms when PO = 1000 W and 500 W, respectively, showing results similar to those in the previous analysis. As the load decreased, it can be seen that conduction time of the output diode was shortened as the magnitude of the resonance current decreased. Figure 22 confirms the DC link capacitor voltage balancing capability for each voltage sag type. As described above, the voltage imbalance was eliminated by changing the CM based on the voltage deviation of the upper and lower capacitors. Meanwhile, the dcomp parameters in Equation (1) had the smallest value in the middle sag case, where the sag operation was performed at the peak point of the resonance current.
Using a Yokogawa WT333E power meter, the power conversion efficiencies for each sag type were measured and compared as shown in Figure 23. When the load was small, the middle sag type with large switching loss showed the lowest efficiency (91.1% efficiency at PO = 500 W), but as the load increased, the middle sag type with the smallest RMS values of the resonance current and output diode current showed the highest efficiency (95.2% efficiency at PO = 1500 W). In fact, in this experiment, because the transformer turn ratio was designed to be small considering the middle sag with a small voltage transfer gain, the period of resonance section was reduced in the edge, rear, and end sag cases. Thus, the resonance currents and the output diode currents of edge, rear, and end sag types became large, resulting in high conduction losses of switches and high copper losses of the transformer and inductor. Therefore, if optimally designed for each sag type, the efficiency rate of the edge, rear, and end sag types can be improved compared to those in this experiment. With an optimal design of the transformer turn ratio for each sag type, the VC* should be placed at a high level of LVR in its normal operating range.

8. Conclusions

In this paper, we proposed an amplitude-modulating full-bridge diode-clamped multilevel LLC resonant converter suitable for power conversion systems that use high input voltages. A new modulation scheme called MNRV DPWM was applied to eliminate voltage deviations in DC link capacitors connected in series. The proposed multilevel resonant converter operates by modulating the magnitude of the fundamental wave input to the resonant tank while fixing the operating frequency at the resonant point. The fixed operating point facilitates the design of passive devices and enables stable operation over a wide operating range with just one power conversion stage. In this paper, we proposed a control algorithm and analyzed the operating characteristics of the proposed diode-clamped four-level LLC resonant converter and presented design guidelines. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed converter were verified through a simulation and via experimentation with the prototype converter.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-S.S.; methodology, M.-S.S. and J.-B.L.; software, M.-S.S.; validation, M.-S.S. and J.-B.L.; formal analysis, M.-S.S.; experiments, M.-S.S. and J.-B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-S.S.; writing—review and editing, M.-S.S. and J.-B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) grant funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation (Grant RS-2022-00143566).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, B.; Lee, F.C.; Huang, G. LLC resonant converter for front end dc/dc conversion. In Proceedings of the APEC, Seventeenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (Cat. No.02CH37335), Dallas, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2002. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lu, B.; Liu, W.; Liang, Y.; Lee, F.C.; van Wyk, J.D. Optimal design methodology for LLC resonant converter. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Dallas, TX, USA, 19–23 March 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beiranvand, R.; Rashidian, B.; Zolghadri, M.R.; Alavi, S.M.H. Using LLC resonant converter for designing wide-range voltage source. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 58, 1746–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fu, M.; Fei, C.; Yang, Y.; Li, Q.; Lee, F.C. A GaN-based dc–dc module for railway applications: Design consideration and high-frequency digital control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 67, 1638–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, J.; Chu, W.Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Z.Q. Power electronic transformer-based railway traction systems: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2017, 5, 1237–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodriguez, J.; Lai, J.-S.; Peng, F.Z. Multilevel inverter: A survey of topologies, controls, and applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2002, 49, 724–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kouro, S.; Malinowski, M.; Gopakumar, K.; Pou, J.; Franquelo, L.G.; Wu, B.; Rodriguez, J.; Pérez, M.A.; Leon, J.I. Recent Advances and Industrial Applications of Multilevel Converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 57, 2553–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gupta, K.K.; Ranjan, A.; Bhatnagar, P.; Sahu, L.K.; Jain, S. Multilevel Inverter Topologies with Reduced Device Count: A Review. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 31, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Venkataramanaiah, J.; Suresh, Y.; Panda, A.K. A review on symmetric, asymmetric, hybrid and single DC sources based multilevel inverter topologies. Renew. Sustian. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 788–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Poorfakhraei, A.; Narimani, M.; Emadi, A. A Review of Modulation and Control Techniques for Multilevel Inverters in Traction Applications. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 24187–24204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yazdani, A.; Iravani, R. A neutral-point clamped converter system for direct-drive variable-speed wind power unit. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2006, 21, 596–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jounanne, A.V.; Dai, S.; Zhang, H. A multilevel inverter providing DC link balancing, ride-through enhancement, and common mode voltage elimination. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2002, 49, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pan, Z.; Peng, F.Z.; Corzine, K.A.; Stefanovic, V.R.; Leuthen, J.M.; Gataric, S. Voltage balancing control of diode-clamped multilevel rectifier/inverter systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2005, 41, 1698–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pou, J.; Pindado, R.; Boroyevich, D. Voltage-balance limits in four-level diode-clamped converters with passive front ends. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2005, 52, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ajami, A.; Shokri, H.; Mokhberdoran, A. Parallel switch-based chopper circuit for DC capacitor voltage balancing in diode-clamped multilevel inverter. IET Power Electron. 2014, 7, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sano, K.; Fujita, H. Voltage-Balancing Circuit Based on a Resonant Switched-Capacitor Converter for Multilevel Inverters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2008, 44, 1768–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cui, D.; Ge, Q. A Novel Hybrid Voltage Balance Method for Five-Level Diode-Clamped Converters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 65, 6020–6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monge, S.B.; Bordonau, J.; Boroyevich, D.; Somavilla, S. The nearest three virtual space vector PWM—A modulation for the comprehensive neutral-point balancing in the three-level NPC Inverter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2004, 2, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Monge, S.B.; Somavilla, S.; Bordonau, J.; Boroyevich, D. Capacitor voltage balance for the neutral-point-clamped converter using the virtual space vector concept with optimized spectral performance. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2007, 22, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, C.; Yu, X.; Holmes, D.G.; Shen, W.; Wang, Q.; Luo, F.; Liu, N. An Improved Virtual Space Vector Modulation Scheme for Three-Level Active Neutral-Point-Clamped Inverter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 32, 7419–7434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, K.; Zheng, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, Y. A generalized carrier-overlapped PWM method for neutral-point clamped multilevel converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 9095–9106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, K.; Zheng, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, Y. Neutral-Point Voltage Balancing Method for Five-Level NPC Inverters Based on Carrier-Overlapped PWM. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 1428–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jin, F.; Liu, F.; Ruan, X.; Meng, X. Multi-Phase Multi-Level LLC Resonant Converter with Low Voltage Stress on the Primary-Side Switches. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14–18 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zumel, P.; Ortega, L.; Lazaro, A.; Fernandez, C.; Barrado, A. Control strategy for modular Dual Active Bridge input series output parallel. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 23–26 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Haga, H.; Kurokawa, F. Modulation method of a full-bridge three level LLC resonant converter for battery charger of electrical vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 2498–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, Y.; Luo, Q.; Mantooth, A. Overview of Modulation Strategies for LLC Resonant Converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 10423–10443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, M.-S. Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM Based on Compensation for Voltage Deviation of the DC-link Capacitors Applicable for Single-Phase NPC Multi-level PWM Converter. J. Korean Soc. Railw. 2018, 21, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, M.-S. NPC Multi-level Propulsion System Using Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM. J. Korean Soc. Railw. 2019, 22, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  29. Song, M.-S.; Cho, I.-H.; Lee, J.-B.; Ryu, J.-H. MNRV DPWM Based Diode-Clamped Multi-level LLC Resonant Converter for High Voltage Utilization. J. Korean Soc. Railw. 2021, 24, 288–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, M.-S.; Cho, I.-H.; Lee, J.-B. ±180° Discontinuous PWM for Single-Phase PWM Converter for High-Speed Railway Propulsion System. Energies 2020, 13, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Choi, H.S. Design consideration of half-bridge LLC resonant converter. J. Power Electron. 2007, 7, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  32. The Simulation Platform for Power Electronic Systems. Available online: https://www.plexim.com/plecs (accessed on 5 April 2022).
Figure 1. Single-phase diode-clamped four-level PWM converter.
Figure 1. Single-phase diode-clamped four-level PWM converter.
Energies 15 04045 g001
Figure 2. Implementation example of MNRV DPWM for a single-phase diode-clamped four-level PWM converter: (a) selection of MNRVs according to the VC* position, (b) switching patterns of the conventional CB-SPWM, and (c) those of the proposed MNRV DPWM.
Figure 2. Implementation example of MNRV DPWM for a single-phase diode-clamped four-level PWM converter: (a) selection of MNRVs according to the VC* position, (b) switching patterns of the conventional CB-SPWM, and (c) those of the proposed MNRV DPWM.
Energies 15 04045 g002
Figure 3. Voltage imbalance problem of a diode-clamped four-level PWM converter using CB-SPWM.
Figure 3. Voltage imbalance problem of a diode-clamped four-level PWM converter using CB-SPWM.
Energies 15 04045 g003
Figure 4. MNRV selection rule according to the VC* position in single-phase full-bridge diode-clamped multilevel topologies.
Figure 4. MNRV selection rule according to the VC* position in single-phase full-bridge diode-clamped multilevel topologies.
Energies 15 04045 g004
Figure 5. Circuit diagram of the proposed full-bridge diode-clamped four-level LLC converter.
Figure 5. Circuit diagram of the proposed full-bridge diode-clamped four-level LLC converter.
Energies 15 04045 g005
Figure 6. Control block diagram for the proposed converter.
Figure 6. Control block diagram for the proposed converter.
Energies 15 04045 g006
Figure 7. Operating circuit states when (a) VC* > 0 and (b) VC* < 0 in the UCM and when (c) VC* > 0 and (d) VC* < 0 in the LCM.
Figure 7. Operating circuit states when (a) VC* > 0 and (b) VC* < 0 in the UCM and when (c) VC* > 0 and (d) VC* < 0 in the LCM.
Energies 15 04045 g007
Figure 8. Equivalent circuit of the resonant tank at the resonance point.
Figure 8. Equivalent circuit of the resonant tank at the resonance point.
Energies 15 04045 g008
Figure 9. Operating mode analysis of the proposed converter.
Figure 9. Operating mode analysis of the proposed converter.
Energies 15 04045 g009
Figure 10. Decomposition of Vleg according to the voltage sag range.
Figure 10. Decomposition of Vleg according to the voltage sag range.
Energies 15 04045 g010
Figure 11. Resonant current waveform at fsw = fr.
Figure 11. Resonant current waveform at fsw = fr.
Energies 15 04045 g011
Figure 12. Relationship between VC* and Vleg.
Figure 12. Relationship between VC* and Vleg.
Energies 15 04045 g012
Figure 13. Voltage change characteristics of DC link capacitors in the LCM.
Figure 13. Voltage change characteristics of DC link capacitors in the LCM.
Energies 15 04045 g013
Figure 14. Current waveform of the output capacitor.
Figure 14. Current waveform of the output capacitor.
Energies 15 04045 g014
Figure 15. Four typical Vleg waveforms depending on the carrier wave shape: (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sag types.
Figure 15. Four typical Vleg waveforms depending on the carrier wave shape: (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sag types.
Energies 15 04045 g015
Figure 16. Simulation results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags.
Figure 16. Simulation results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags.
Energies 15 04045 g016aEnergies 15 04045 g016b
Figure 17. Switches loss analysis for the middle, edge, rear, and end sag types when PO = 1000 W.
Figure 17. Switches loss analysis for the middle, edge, rear, and end sag types when PO = 1000 W.
Energies 15 04045 g017
Figure 18. Prototype circuit of the proposed converter.
Figure 18. Prototype circuit of the proposed converter.
Energies 15 04045 g018
Figure 19. Experimental results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 1500 W.
Figure 19. Experimental results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 1500 W.
Energies 15 04045 g019
Figure 20. Experimental results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 1000 W.
Figure 20. Experimental results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 1000 W.
Energies 15 04045 g020
Figure 21. Experimental results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 500 W.
Figure 21. Experimental results for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 500 W.
Energies 15 04045 g021
Figure 22. Voltage-balancing performances for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 1000 W.
Figure 22. Voltage-balancing performances for the (a) middle, (b) edge, (c) rear, and (d) end sags when PO = 1000 W.
Energies 15 04045 g022
Figure 23. Efficiency comparison for the middle, edge, rear, and end sags.
Figure 23. Efficiency comparison for the middle, edge, rear, and end sags.
Energies 15 04045 g023
Table 1. Simulation condition.
Table 1. Simulation condition.
PO (kW)Vdc (V)VO (V)Lr (mH)Lm (mH)Cr (nF)Cdc (μH)CO (μH)nfsw (kHz)
17003501.54.28168100111.6810
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, M.-S.; Lee, J.-B. Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Full-Bridge Diode-Clamped Multilevel LLC Resonant Converter Using Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM. Energies 2022, 15, 4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114045

AMA Style

Song M-S, Lee J-B. Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Full-Bridge Diode-Clamped Multilevel LLC Resonant Converter Using Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM. Energies. 2022; 15(11):4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Min-Sup, and Jae-Bum Lee. 2022. "Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation Full-Bridge Diode-Clamped Multilevel LLC Resonant Converter Using Multi-Neighboring Reference Vector Discontinuous PWM" Energies 15, no. 11: 4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop