Next Article in Journal
Current Status and Correlation of Physical Activity and Tendency to Problematic Mobile Phone Use in College Students
Previous Article in Journal
The Economic Value of Water Ecology in Sponge City Construction Based on a Ternary Interactive System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Mental Health Interventions Delivered by Frontline Health Care Workers in Emergency Health Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
2
Department of Emergency Response and Preparedness, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
3
Psychological Rescue Branch, China Association for Disaster and Emergency Rescue Medicine, Haidian District, Beijing 100080, China
4
Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
5
Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15847; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315847
Submission received: 9 September 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022

Abstract

:
This systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered by frontline health care workers in disasters and public health emergencies. Six databases and trial registries were searched, and manual searches were conducted. Of the 221 studies identified, 21 were included. Meta-analyses assessed differences between the intervention and control in terms of PTSD outcomes. Eleven studies of 1802 participants were incorporated in the meta-analysis. Interventions delivered or prompted by specialist health care workers showed significant and large effects in improving PTSD-related symptoms with a SMD = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42–1.57, p = 0.0007). Interventions delivered or prompted by frontline non-specialist health care workers showed significant but small effects in improving PTSD-related symptoms with SMD of 0.25 (95% CI: 0.11–0.39; p = 0.0007). The results showed that most mental health interventions delivered by frontline health care workers effectively supported affected people. Mental health interventions delivered by mental health care professionals are effective in reducing PTSD-related disorders in natural disasters. Future adequately powered RCTs are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered by trained non-specialists. Economic modelling may be useful to estimate cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries given the difficulties of conducting studies in disaster and emergency settings.

1. Introduction

Natural disasters have killed approximately 60,000 people every year, on average, during the last two decades [1]. In 2021, natural disasters caused approximately 10,492 deaths and affected 101.8 million people globally, with an estimated global economic loss of $343 billion USD [2]. The World Health Organization has identified disaster-related mental health issues as among the most pressing public health issues [3]. Natural disasters (such as floods, bushfires, and earthquakes) and public emergencies (such as pandemics, wars, and civil disorders) have negative mental health implications for those who are directly or indirectly affected [4]. Due to exposure to traumatic events and chronic stress, various mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and bipolar emotional disorders, occur during disasters. PTSD is the most common mental health problem following a disaster [5]. According to the American Psychiatric Association [6], when an individual lives through or witness traumatic incidents or is being threatened by death, experiencing severe injury, or sexual abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may occur. Directly experiencing the traumatic incident, seeing it happen to others, hearing that it happened to a family member or close acquaintance, or indirectly being exposed due to work-related responsibilities are all forms of exposure. Examples of traumatic situations include war, physical assault, terrorist strikes, and natural catastrophes. PTSD symptoms include (a) reliving the trauma in upsetting memories, flashbacks, or frequent dreams or nightmares; (b) avoiding situations or activities that bring up the traumatic event; (c) diminished responsiveness (emotional anaesthesia or numbing); and (d) feelings of detachment and estrangement from others. Chronic physiological arousal can also cause symptoms such as an exaggerated startle (see survivor guilt).
The prevalence of mental health disorders in disaster-affected areas has been reported to be double to triple that in the general population [7]. According to a systematic review published in 2019, the prevalence of severe mental disorders in conflict settings (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder) was 22.1%, and one out of every 11 people (9%) exposed to conflict in the previous ten years would develop a moderate or severe mental disorder [8]. A review carried out between January 2009 and March 2013 from 90 refugee camps across 15 low- and middle-income countries revealed that 77% of healthcare visits were for mental substance use disorders, psychotic disorders, and moderate and severe depression, anxiety, and PTSD [9].
In emergency situations, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is the most common mental health issue. The prevalence of PTSD among direct victims is estimated to be 30–40%, while it is 10–20% among rescue professionals and 5–10% in the general public [10]. Mental health issues can become chronic if not treated. According to research conducted in a refugee camp on the Turkish–Syrian border, 24–30% of those who were exposed to the Syrian Civil War had PTSD and depression co-morbidly, 4–6% solely had PTSD, and 19% only had depression three years later [11].
Early mental health care may reduce negative mental health effects for those affected by emergencies [12,13]. Interventions suitable for use in disaster and public emergency situations need to be brief and culturally relevant, with proven effectiveness and cost-effectiveness [14]. Frontline healthcare workers must be able to provide rapid mental health support in addition to physical healthcare to affected people as first responders in emergencies [15].
Previous systematic reviews have been unable to offer clear conclusions to guide implementation or health policy on this topic because they needed to focus on all these disorders together, as opposed to one or some only, for several reasons: (1) they targeted certain clinical populations such as people suffering from depression or anxiety disorders, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [16,17,18]; (2) they focused on the effects of specific psychiatric therapies such as cognitive behavioral therapy, eye movement desensitization, and reprocessing (EMDR) or therapeutic components [18,19,20,21,22]; and (3) studies did not include evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs) or underrepresented LAMICS [23,24].
The current understanding of which psychological interventions and care models can improve mental wellbeing in disasters/emergencies is incomplete, based on insufficiently robust and clear evidence [25]. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of all types of mental health interventions delivered by frontline healthcare workers during natural disasters and in public emergency settings.

2. Methods

This systematic review and associated meta-analysis were implemented according to the Cochrane guidelines on systematic reviews of observational studies and according to PRISMA-P. The PRISMA-P checklist is illustrated in Figure 1. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42021266648).

2.1. Eligibility Criteria

Studies focusing on mental health interventions involving preparedness, response, and rehabilitation in natural disaster and emergency settings were eligible, except for qualitative studies, uncontrolled studies, conference presentations, studies of personal traumatic events, and medical emergency studies. Mental health interventions refer to general approaches to promoting awareness of mental health or measures tailored to deal with a specific mental health disorder, such as depression or anxiety. The types of interventions ranged from counselling to psychotherapy, psychoeducation, behavioral activation, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). No restrictions were placed on the method used to assess mental health, with data ranging from self-report surveys to objective assessments recorded using established methodologies.

2.2. Search Strategy

Six databases (Embase, PsycINFO, Epub, Global Health, APA PsycInfo, and MEDLINE) were searched from their inception to December 2021. Searches were conducted by combining combinations of the five categories of keywords (Supplementary Materials). In addition, Google Scholar and WHO databases were manually searched, and 31 additional studies were identified. There were no data limitations in this study.

2.3. Selection Process and Data Extraction

The search results were exported to EndNote 20, where duplicates were removed. The included studies were screened manually to identify other potentially relevant studies. The characteristics of the studies included are summarized in Table 1. The primary investigator (MP) reviewed the search strategy. Following the above inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers (MP and JS) independently reviewed relevant studies for potential inclusion. Any differences in opinions were resolved through discussion until a consensus was reached. This process minimized the risk of bias in the decision to include or exclude studies. A PRISMA flowchart is shown in Figure 1.
Table 1. Summary characteristics of included studies.
Table 1. Summary characteristics of included studies.
Author and YearCountry of OriginDisaster and YearStudy Design and ParticipantsInterventionComparatorsPrimary Outcome Measures
1. (Başoğlu, 2005) [14]Turkey1999 EarthquakeStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 59. Survivors of earthquake
Mean age: 36.3 years (16–65 years)
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 31; waitlist control n = 28
Brief behavioral treatmentWaitlist controlClinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS; Blake et al., 1995) [26]
2. (Wolmer, 2005) [27]Turkey1999 EarthquakeStudy design: Controlled before and after study.
N = 287. Students studied in three schools located in the disaster area.
Mean age: 11.5 years (Children aged 9–17 years)
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 67; control n = 220.
School reactivation programNo treatmentThe Child Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (CPTSD-RI; Pynoos et al., 1987) [28]
3. (Steinmetz, 2012) [29]USAHurricane Study design: Randomised control trial.
N = 56. Survivors from previous stress study.
Mean age: 43 years
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 18; control (UC) n = 19; information only n = 19
Internet-based psychoeducationUsual care or Information onlyTrauma Screening Questionnaire (Brewin et al., 2002) [30]
4. (Zang, 2013) [31]ChinaEarthquakeStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 22. People severely affected by earthquake
Mean age: 55.73 years
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 11; waitlist control n = 11
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET)Waitlist controlImpact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (Weiss, 2007) [32]; General Health Questionnaire-28 (Goldberg and Hillier, 1979) [33]
5. (Adams, 2013) [34]USALarge-scale community disasterStudy design: Controlled before and after study
N = 215. Primary care paediatricians.
Mean age: n/a
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 137; control n = 78
RCI trainingN/APractice change survey
6. (Zang, 2014) [35]China2008 EarthquakeStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 30. Adults affected by the earthquake
Mean age: 53.63 years
Experimental Group/s: intervention NET n = 10, NET-R n = 10; waitlist control n = 10
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET)Waitlist controlImpact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (Weiss, 2007) [32]
7. (Jiang, 2014) [36]China2008 EarthquakeStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 49.
Mean age: 29.8 years
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 27; treat as usual n = 22
Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), a 12-week structured psychotherapy TAUClinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS; Blake et al., 1995) [26]
8. (Jacob, 2014) [37]Rwanda1994 Rwandan genocideStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 76.
Typical age: 47.55 years (widow); 24.55 years (orphan)
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 38; waitlist control n = 38
Narrative exposure therapy (NET) treatmentWaitlist controlClinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
9. (Ruggiero, 2015) [38]USATornadoes Study design: Randomised control trial
N = 2000. Adolescents and parents from communities affected by tornadoes
Mean age: 14.55 years (12–17 years)
Experimental Group/s: intervention BBN n = 364, BBN + ASH n = 366; control n = 257
Bounce Back Now (BBN), a modular web-based intervention;
BBN plus a 7-module adult self-help (ASH) intervention
No treatmentAdolescent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression assessed using the National Survey of Adolescents (NSA) PTSD module (Kilpatrick et al., 2003) [39]
10. (Bass, 2016) [40]IraqConflict and displacementStudy design: Randomised control trial
N = 209.
Population in the northern Dohuk region
Mean age: 40 years (18–82 years)
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 159; control n = 50
A 2-week training program that emphasized a social work model of helping and support.Waitlist controlThe Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-2528,29 (a 25-item version of the HSCL) for symptoms of depression and anxiety (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) [41]
11. (Acarturk, 2016) [11]SyriaHumanitarian traumaStudy design: Randomised control trial
N = 70. Adult refugees located in Kilis Refugee Camp at the Turkish–Syrian border with a PTSD diagnosis
Mean age: 33.7 years
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 37; control n = 30
EMDRWaitlist controlIES-R (a self-report instrument which rates the severity of PTSD symptoms) (Weiss, 2007) [32]
12. (Cohen, 2017) [42]USAHurricane Study design: Simulation model.
N = 2,642,713 (Model population living in the areas of New York City affected by Hurricane Sandy).
Typical age: 33.9% aged 18–34 years, 49.0% aged 35–64 years, and 17.1% aged <65 years)
Experimental Group/s: n/a
Stepped care case-finding intervention (stepped care (SC))Usual careThe Child Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (CPTSD-RI) (Frederick et al., 1992) [43]
13. (Dawson, 2018) [44]IndonesiaCivil conflictStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 64. Children with post-traumatic stress disorder.
Mean age: 10.7 years. (7–14 years)
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 32; comparison n = 32
Trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapyProblem-solving therapy provided by lay counselors who were provided with brief trainingPTSD measured by the PTSD Child Reaction Index. (Frederick et al., 1992) [43]
14. (Welton-Mitchell, 2018) [45]NepalEarthquakeStudy design: Quasi-experimental study. Cluster randomised design.
N = 240. People in two earthquake-affected communities
Mean age: 38 years.
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 120; control n = 120
A hybrid mental health and disaster preparedness interventionWaitlist controlA 7-item investigator developed checklist to measure self-reported disaster preparedness
15. (James, 2020) [46]HaitiEarthquake; hurricanes, flooding, and landslidesStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 480. Community members, drawn from three disaster-affected communities
Mean age: 37 years (18–78).
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 240; control n = 240
Community-based mental health-integrated disaster preparedness interventionWaitlist controlA 12-item Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs (HESPER) developed by WHO and King’s College London (Semrau et al., 2012) [47]
16. (Rahman, 2019) [38]PakistanArmed conflictStudy design: Cluster randomised control trial.
N = 612. Women in a post-conflict setting.
Mean age: 36.32 years.
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 306; control n = 306
Brief group psychological interventionEnhanced usual care (EUC)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) [48]
17. (Dhital, 2019) [49]Nepal EarthquakeStudy design: Cluster randomised control trial.
N = 1220. Students from 15 selected schools.
Typical age: School-going adolescents from grades six to eight.
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 605; control n = 615
Psycho-social support provided by trained teachersNo treatmentPTSD symptoms were measured using CPSS, a 17-item measure for children and adolescents (Foa et al., 2001) [50]
18. (Kılıç and Şimşek, 2019) [51]TurkeyDisasterStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 76. Nursing students.
Typical age: 81.6% 20–23 years; 18.4% 24 years and above.
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 38; control n = 38.
Psychological first-aid trainingNo treatmentDisaster preparedness perception scale (Özcan, 2013) [52]
19. (Sijbrandij, 2020) [53]Sierra LeoneEbola and disastersStudy design: Cluster randomised control trial.
N = 408. Primary health workers.
Mean age: 39.5 years (intervention); 38.5 years (control).
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 202; waitlist control n = 206.
One-day face-to-face PFA group trainingsWaitlist controlPost-PFA assessment; professional attitude
20. (Hamdani, 2020) [54]PakistanConflict and displacementStudy design: Randomised control trial.
N = 346. Primary care attendees with high levels of psychological distress
Typical age: n/a.
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 172; comparison n = 174
Problem managementEnhanced TAUHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith,1983) [48]
Incremental costs per unit change in anxiety, depression, and functioning scores.
21. (Lotzin et al., 2021) [55]Germany Traumatic event: life threatening illness or injury, etc.Study design: Randomised control trial.
N = 30. Survivors.
Mean age: 42 years (22–63 years).
Experimental Group/s: intervention n = 15; waitlist control n = 15
SOLAR, a 5-session psychosocial interventionWaitlist controlThe Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) (CSQ-8; Larsen et al., 1979) [56]
Abbreviations: BBN—Bounce Back Now; CAPS—The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CHWs—Community health workers; EMDR—Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing; EUC—The enhanced usual care; HESPER—Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs; IPT—Interpersonal Psychotherapy; NET—Narrative Exposure Therapy; PTSD—Post-traumatic stress disorder; RCHC—The Resilience and Coping for the Healthcare Community; RCI—Reaching Children Initiative; SPR—Skills for Psychological Recovery; SOLAR—the Skills for Life Adjustment and Resilience; TAU—Treat as usual; and UC—Usual care.
Meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted in RevMan 5.4 using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals to describe between-group differences for changes in PTSD related symptoms. We also examined the effects of different types of intervention providers on the results by dividing the study participants into three groups: professional-led intervention, non-mental specialist healthcare worker intervention, and internet-based intervention.

2.4. Risk of Bias and Quality of Evidence Assessment

Two independent reviewers (MP and JS) assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB2 and ROBIN-I) [57,58]. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through consensus, with reference to the full text. The quality of randomized controlled studies was assessed using the Jadad scale in the following domains: measures, interventions, assignment, confounded conditions, and use of multimodal measures. The domains were confirmed as good, fair, poor, or unclear. A study was assessed as poor quality if it had at least one poor quality domain. If a study was assessed with both unclear and good quality domains, it was assessed as being of unclear quality. A funnel plot was created using RevMan 5.4.1 to show the risk of publication bias.
Quality assessment of the included 21 articles was conducted using the Jadad scale [59] and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [60]. The quality of the randomized controlled studies was assessed in three areas: randomization, blinding, and description of withdrawals/dropouts. The quality of the non-randomized controlled studies was assessed in four areas: selection, comparability, exposure, and outcome. The NOS consists of eight items with three subscales, and the maximum total score for these three subsets is 9. Since there is no consensus on what defines a high-quality study, we considered a study with a score of less than 7 to be of high quality [61].

2.5. Outcome Measures

Measures of effect included Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) [62]; self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [48]; Depression Self-Rating Scale, which is an 18-item self-report measure for children and adolescents [63]; self-reported behavior changes [64]; Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Trauma (CSE) [65]; Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) [1]; Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) [66]; Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) [67]; Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) [68]; the M.I.N.I. (a semi-structured clinician-rated interview) [69]; and the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL) [70].

2.6. Data Synthesis

Narrative synthesis was used to report the main characteristics, methods, and findings of the included studies. In addition, a meta-analysis was conducted on studies with primary outcomes centered on PTSD reduction. A mean difference combined with a random-effects model was used to synthesize continuous data. The mean difference, 95% confidence interval, and p-value were provided with an associated I2 measure of heterogeneity. If I2 > 80%, this result was explored using the following subgroups to explain the heterogeneity: age, frailty, intervention type, sex, study size, and study-level quality assessment.

3. Results

3.1. Study Characteristics

A total of 151 reports were identified from the electronic database searches after removing duplicate records. After screening titles and abstracts for relevance, 58 full texts were assessed to yield the 21 studies included in the review. The remaining 21 studies were quality-assessed and included in the final synthesis. Of the included studies, 16 were randomized controlled trials, three were controlled studies [27,34,71], and two were cost effectiveness analyses [42,54]. See Table 1 for details.
All included studies were of good quality. See Table 2 and Table 3 for details.
Table 2. Quality Assessment of randomised controlled studies using the Jadad Scale.
Table 2. Quality Assessment of randomised controlled studies using the Jadad Scale.
Author#1 (0–2)
Randomisation
#2 (0–2)
Masking (Blinding)
#3 (0–1)
Withdrawals and Dropouts (Accountability of Participants)
Quality Score
Jacob et al. (2014) [37]2215
Bass et al. (2016) [40]2215
Acarturk et al. (2016) [11]2215
Basoglu et al. (2005) [14]2204
Jiang et al. (2014) [36]2204
Dawson et al. (2018) [44]2204
James et al. (2020) [46]2204
Steinmetz et al. (2012) [29]2114
Ruggiero et al. (2015) [38]2204
Rahman et al. (2019) [38]2204
Sijbrandij et al. (2019) [53]1214
Dhital et al. (2019) [49]2114
Kilic and Şimşek (2019) [51]2114
Hamdani et al. (2020) [54]2114
Lotzin et al. (2021) [55]2114
Zang et al. (2013) [31]2114
Zang et al. (2014) [35]2114
Table 3. Quality Assessment of non-randomised studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessment tool [60].
Table 3. Quality Assessment of non-randomised studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessment tool [60].
Author#1
Selection
#2
Comparability
#3
Exposure/Outcome
Level of Quality
Welton-Mitchell et al. (2018) [45]323Good
Wolmer et al. (2005) [27]322Good
Wade et al. (2014) [72]322Good
McCabe et al. (2011) [73]322Good
Powell and Yuma-Guerrero (2016) [74]322Good
O’Donnell et al. (2020) [4]322Good
Adams et al. (2013) [34]223Good
Cohen et al. (2017) [42]422Good
(Thresholds: Good quality—3 or 4 stars in selection domain AND 1 or 2 stars in comparability domain AND 2 or 3 stars in outcome/exposure domain; Fair quality—2 stars in selection domain AND 1 or 2 stars in comparability domain AND 2 or 3 stars in outcome/exposure domain; and Poor quality—0 or 1 star in selection domain OR 0 stars in comparability domain OR 0 or 1 star in outcome/exposure domain).

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

More than half (9/17) of the 17 RCT studies used a waitlist/delayed-treatment control group. The majority (14/17, 82.4%) of studies were carried out in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs)—China (3), Turkey (2), Pakistan (2), Haiti (1), Syria (1), Iraq (1), Rwanda (1), Nepal (1), Indonesia (1), and Sierra Leone (1)—while only 17.6% originated from upper-middle-income countries—USA (2) and Germany (1).
Regarding intervention type, six were psychotherapies, including three using narrative exposure therapy (NET) and one each using eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), cognitive behavioral technique (CBT), and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). The duration of psychological intervention for affected people varied from 1 h behavior treatment [14] to two to three-hour psychotherapy [37] to five weekly sessions of psychosocial intervention [44,55] and 12 h psychotherapy [36]. The length of mental health training intervention for providers (practitioners) ranged from one day [34,53] to 6 h training [51] to one or two weeks [38,44] to a maximum period of 40 h, as, for example, in Problem Management Plus (PM+) [54].
Most studies (19/21) investigated outcomes for disaster survivors covering earthquakes (8), hurricanes (2), tornadoes (1), flooding and landslides (1), conflict and displacement (6), public health emergency (1), and two reported outcomes for community workers, primary health care workers, and emergency response personnel.
In terms of sample size, 14.3% of the studies had small samples (n < 30), most of the studies (66.7%) were between 31 and 600, and 19.0% were above 600.
Five (23.8%) long-term follow-up studies with one year or more were found [14,27,37,38] including one simulated long-term follow-up [42]. Six (28.6%) underwent 3–12-month follow-ups [35,36,38,40,44,46]. Three (14.3%) had follow-ups that lasted less than three months [11,29,31].

3.3. Overall Findings of RCTs and Controlled Studies

3.3.1. Effectiveness of the Interventions

Psychotherapies

We found seven studies that investigated this type of intervention—they found it was largely effective in all studies [11,14,31,35,36,37,44]. Psychotherapy and narrative exposure therapy significantly reduced PTSD symptoms in adult refugees living in the Kilis Refugee Camp at the Turkish–Syrian border [11], as well as in Rwandan widows and orphans intervened by psychologists [37], when compared with the control groups. Interpersonal psychotherapy, administered by mental health professionals, was found to reduce depression in people who continued to suffer mental health impacts from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China [36]. Narrative exposure treatment provided by psychologists had a significant effect on lowering PTSD, depression, and anxiety as well as improving post-traumatic growth and perceived social support in Sichuan earthquake survivors [31,35].

Psychoeducation or Trainings

We found eight studies that investigated these types of intervention—they found it was largely effective in eight studies [29,38,38,40,46,51,53,54]. Counselling delivered by community mental health workers in primary health clinics in northern Iraq significantly reduced depression, dysfunction, and anxiety in adults [40]. A brief group psychological intervention administered by non-specialists working with local community health professionals had a significant effect on anxiety, depression, and dysfunction in women aged 18–60 years living in rural villages in Pakistan [38,54]. Psychological first aid training provided by trained mental health nurses significantly improved self-efficacy and perceived preparedness among nurses in Turkey [51], significantly enhanced their knowledge and understanding of appropriate psychosocial responses, and improved skills in primary health care workers in Sierra Leone [53]. When compared with control groups, two web-based psychoeducation interventions had significantly fewer PTSD symptoms [38] and depression [29]. The brief mental-health-integrated disaster preparedness training conducted by trained lay mental health workers in Haiti was effective [46].

Psychosocial Support

We found two studies investigating psychosocial support. One found that it was ineffective in reducing PTSD symptoms, depression symptoms, or improving hope among adolescents delivered by trained school instructors [49], while another study found that the control group was more effective in reducing PTSD symptoms compared with the intervention group which provided support by community non-mental health professionals [55].

3.3.2. Cost-Effectiveness of the Interventions

Only two studies [42,54] assessed the cost-effectiveness of psychological skills and behavior technique interventions in disaster settings. A simulation model found that stepped care case-finding with referral to cognitive behavioral therapy for US hurricane survivors was more cost-effective than referral to coping skills alone at an acceptable additional cost per disability-adjusted life year [42]. Problem management interventions using problem-solving and behavioral techniques delivered by trained non-specialist health workers to distressed primary care patients were found to be more expensive but more effective than treatment as usual [54]. They concluded that the intervention was likely to be more cost-effective, although threshold willingness to pay values were problematic in the LAMIC context.
Table 4 presents an overview of the results of the RCTs and controlled studies.

3.3.3. Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of eleven PTSD studies was performed. PTSD-focused psychotherapy interventions delivered by professionals were compared with a waitlist control group [11,14,31,35,37] or a usual care control group [36] during the synthesis process. PTSD-focused mental health interventions conducted by non-professionals were compared with waitlist controls [27,46] or a comparison group [44]. PTSD-focused online mental health interventions were compared with no intervention [38] or usual care conditions [29]). The last time-point of data collection was used as the effect size. In those studies that used waitlist control groups, the pre-intervention data of the waitlist group were compared with the post-intervention data of the intervention group. Nine different measures were used to assess PTSD symptoms. See Table 5.

Subgroup: Effect of Mental Health Intervention on PTSD-Related Symptoms

Potential publication bias was assessed by visual examination of the funnel plots. See Figure 2.

Comparison of Mental-Health-Professional-Delivered Mental Health Interventions versus Control Group

Six studies with 313 participants compared interventions delivered by specialist mental health professionals, including psychotherapists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists or social and human service providers who provide support to improve an individual’s mental health or treat mental disorders. The average age of the participants was 23.0 years, and 58.0% were female. A mean difference fitted with a random-effects model was used to synthesize the continuous data. The random effect model was to estimate the impact of a person’s intrinsic and immeasurable qualities. Five studies found that mental healthcare provided by specialists was more successful in reducing PTSD-related symptoms compared with controls. One study found that mental health interventions were ineffective at reducing PTSD [11].
After pooling, we found that interventions delivered by mental health specialists had a clear effect on PTSD reduction, with a standardized MD = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42–1.57, I2 = 80, p = 0.0007). Thus, compared with the control group, mental health interventions administered by health professionals were beneficial. We fitted professional-delivered intervention subgroups to this finding and were unable to explain the heterogeneity. See Figure 3.
PTSD reduction with professional-delivered mental health interventions compared with PTSD reduction with control group. Effect sizes (Std diff in means) were computed for control designs. 0.20 = small, 0.50 = medium, and 0.80 = large [62].

Comparison of Non-Specialists’ Mental Health Interventions versus PTSD Reduction without Mental Health Interventions

Three studies with 831 participants compared these outcomes. After pooling, we found that the SMD was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.11–0.39; I2 = 0%, p = 0.0007). The effectiveness of non-specialist mental health interventions was shown to be small compared with waitlist controls. One of the three included studies found mental-health-integrated disaster preparedness intervention to be more effective in reducing PTSD-related symptoms [46], while the other two found no significant effect of trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy and a school-based intervention programme which combined psychoeducation and cognitive behavioral techniques in improving the symptoms of post-trauma compared with the control groups [27,44]. See Figure 3.

Comparison of PTSD-Related Symptoms with Web Mental Health Interventions versus PTSD-Related Symptoms without Mental Health Interventions

Two studies with 658 participants evaluated web-based interventions. After pooling, the SMD was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14–0.35; I2 = 0%, p = 0.01), suggesting that mental health interventions delivered via the Internet were only marginally effective. One study found that mental health interventions were more effective in reducing PTSD [38], while another study found that mental health interventions were not effective [29]. The latter had a limited sample size of 37 [29] compared with those that identified an effect, which had a median of 188 participants. Consequently, a lack of significant effect was associated with a lack of power. See Figure 3.

4. Discussion

This is the first systematic review to comprehensively explore both effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the full range of mental health interventions delivered by frontline health care workers in disaster and emergency contexts. We found evidence of a strong and significant association between mental health interventions provided by frontline specialist health care workers and reduced PTSD symptoms in survivors of disasters and health emergencies. We identified a lack of health economic evidence needed to support decision-making and public investment in enhancing mental health skills training in disasters and public health emergencies. These findings support scaling up the timely and effective mental health interventions to enhance mental health capability of responders in disasters and emergencies and better support people in need.
This systematic review identified 21 studies, including 17 randomized controlled trials and four non-randomized studies, evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered by frontline healthcare workers. Only two of these studies assessed the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. The vast majority of RCTs (15/17, 88%) found an improvement in mental health outcomes. Most of these studies examined the primary outcome of PTSD reduction (11/17, 65%). Owing to the heterogeneity of the identified studies, a meta-analysis could not be performed. However, it was possible to implement a meta-analysis of 11 studies on interventions targeted at post-disaster traumatic symptoms and PTSD. This meta-analysis found a strong and significant association between mental health interventions provided by frontline specialist health care workers and reduced PTSD symptoms in survivors of disasters and health emergencies but only small or marginal effects for mental health interventions delivered by non-specialists or web-based, respectively.
There is a need for more studies on mental health interventions for various groups with specific requirements, such as young people, women, the disabled, and the elderly [27,38,38,44]. The results of studies focused on school aged adolescents and children were mixed. School-based mental health interventions targeting children and their educational environment significantly improved overall daily functioning but not trauma-related symptoms [27,44]. The latter could be explained by the fact that it used problem-solving as a comparison instead of no intervention [44]. However, trained teachers’ psychosocial support has no significant effect on children’s PTSD or depression symptoms [49], implying that closer collaboration between mental health professionals and teachers, as well as more specific training, is required for school-based interventions to be both feasible and sustainable [27].
Nearly three-quarters of the studies (71.4%, 15/21) focused on low- and middle-income countries (LAMIC), with RCTs accounting for the majority (13/15). They discovered that a simple supportive counselling and psychoeducation group-based program significantly reduced depression [38,40,54], decreased anxiety [38,54], and improved daily functioning [54]. Moreover, low intensity psychoeducational intervention significantly improved disaster-responding knowledge and skills [53] and general self-efficacy [51]. Psychotherapies such as NET, interpersonal IPT, behavioral treatment, and EMDR have been shown to significantly reduce PTSD symptoms [11,14,31,36,37,44] and major depressive disorders [31,36].
Low intensity and easy-to-implement psychological interventions were also more acceptable for survivors following disasters, as well as more likely to be delivered by trained non-mental health frontline workers, and significantly reduced distress, PTSD symptoms, and functional impairment [55]. Such “low-intensity intervention” or support by community-based providers with less mental health expertise has had a big impact on providing accessible mental health support in resource-poor settings in humanitarian circumstances [35,37,38,40,46,71]. Furthermore, because hiring local trainers/supervisors can reduce costs, local mental health capacity-building is recommended. For disaster response and recovery, multi-sector collaboration and coordination of psychological techniques as well as community-based efforts have been advocated [71]. Additional resources should also be assigned to improve preparedness and response capabilities [46,71].
This review included only publications written in English. For the data synthesis, the narrative methodology for whole sampling may duplicate evidence and risk subjective analysis of studies. Despite these limitations, narrative reviews offer a breadth of literature coverage and flexibility to deal with evolving knowledge and concepts.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review synthesised randomized controlled trials and cost-effectiveness studies as key evidence for assessing psychological and mental health interventions delivered by frontline healthcare workers in disaster contexts. Mental health interventions delivered by frontline healthcare workers may be time- and cost-effective for lowering psychological distress in natural disaster settings [44,46]. This review demonstrates that brief and low-intensity interventions, such as psychoeducation and social support programs, as well as skills training, are viable options in disasters.
More controlled trials with adequately powered sample sizes and longer-term follow-ups are needed. Given the inherent difficulty in conducting RCTs among disaster survivors in LAMICs, economic modelling may be particularly useful to estimate cost effectiveness at the population level.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192315847/s1.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed sufficiently to the manuscript to be included as authors. Conception and design of the study: M.P., J.S. and T.X.; review of quantitative data analysis: B.C. and P.C.; drafting the manuscript: M.P. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82173201).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42021266648).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TSSCTraumatic Stress Symptom Checklist
MPSSModified PTSD Symptoms Scale
MDRMy Disaster Recovery
IES-RImpact of Event Scale-Revised
DSM-IVDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition
CAPSClinician-Administered PTSD Scale
BBNBounce Back Now
NSANational Survey of Adolescents PTSD module
EMDREye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
CBTCognitive Behavior Therapy
PSProblem-solving
PTSDPost-traumatic Stress Disorder
UCLA PTSD-RILos Angeles [UCLA] PTSD Reaction Index [RI]
CPTSD-RIChild Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index
PCL-CPost-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist—Civilian Version

References

  1. Wade, D.; Crompton, D.; Howard, A.; Stevens, N.; Metcalf, O.; Brymer, M.; Ruzek, J.; Watson, P.; Bryant, R.; Forbes, D. Skills for Psychological Recovery: Evaluation of a post-disaster mental health training program. Disaster Health 2014, 2, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Emergency Event Database. 2021. Available online: www.emdat.be (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  3. World Health Organization. Mental Health Atlas; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. O’Donnell, M.L.; Lau, W.; Fredrickson, J.; Gibson, K.; Bryant, R.A.; Bisson, J.; Burke, S.; Busuttil, W.; Coghlan, A.; Creamer, M.; et al. Child disaster mental health interventions: Therapy components. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2014, 29, 494–502. [Google Scholar]
  5. Farooqui, M.; Quadri, S.A.; Suriya, S.S.; Khan, M.A.; Ovais, M.; Sohail, Z.; Shoaib, S.; Tohid, H.; Hassan, M. Posttraumatic stress disorder: A serious post-earthquake complication. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2017, 39, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR®); American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Math, S.B.; Nirmala, M.C.; Moirangthem, S.; Kumar, N.C. Disaster Management: Mental Health Perspective. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2015, 37, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Charlson, F.; van Ommeren, M.; Flaxman, A.; Cornett, J.; Whiteford, H.; Saxena, S. New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2019, 394, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Kane, J.C.; Ventevogel, P.; Spiegel, P.; Bass, J.K.; van Ommeren, M.; Tol, W.A. Mental, neurological, and substance use problems among refugees in primary health care: Analysis of the Health Information System in 90 refugee camps. BMC Med. 2014, 12, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Goldmann, E.; Galea, S. Mental health consequences of disasters. Ann. Rev. Public Health 2014, 35, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Acarturk, C.; Konuk, E.; Cetinkaya, M.; Senay, I.; Sijbrandij, M.; Gulen, B.; Cuijpers, P. The efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression among Syrian refugees: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychol. Med. 2016, 46, 2583–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Castillo, E.G.; Ijadi-Maghsoodi, R.; Shadravan, S.; Moore, E.; Mensah, M.O.; Docherty, M.; Nunez, M.G.A.; Barcelo, N.; Goodsmith, N.; Halpin, L.E.; et al. Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2019, 21, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chambers, M.; Kantaris, X. Enhancing the therapeutic interaction skills of staff working in acute adult inpatient psychiatric wards: Outcomes of a brief intervention education programme. J. Nurs. Educ. Pract. 2017, 7, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Basoglu, M.; Şalcıoğlu, E.; Livanou, M.; Kalender, D.; Acar, G. Single-Session Behavioral Treatment of Earthquake-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Waiting List Controlled Trial. J. Trauma. Stress 2005, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dong, L.; Bouey, J. Public Mental Health Crisis during COVID-19 Pandemic, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1616–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lipinski, K.; Liu, L.L.; Wong, P.W. The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions implemented after the Indian Ocean Tsunami: A systematic review. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2016, 62, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lopes, A.P.; Macedo, T.F.; Coutinho, E.S.F.; Figueira, I.; Ventura, P.R. Systematic review of the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy related treatments for victims of natural disasters: A worldwide problem. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pfefferbaum, B.; Nitiéma, P.; Newman, E.; Patel, A. The Benefit of Interventions to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress in Youth Exposed to Mass Trauma: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2019, 34, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gillies, D.; Taylor, F.; Gray, C.; O’Brien, L.; D’Abrew, N. Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (Review). Evid. Based Child Health 2013, 8, 1004–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kar, N. Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A review. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat 2011, 7, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Mendes, D.D.; Mello, M.; Ventura, P.; Passarela, C.D.M.; Mari, J.D.J. A systematic review on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2008, 38, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Natha, F.; Daiches, A. The effectiveness of EMDR in reducing psychological distress in survivors of natural disasters: A review. J. EMDR Pract. Res. 2014, 8, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Coombe, J.; MacKenzie, L.; Munro, R.; Hazell, T.; Perkins, D.; Reddy, P. Teacher-Mediated Interventions to Support Child Mental Health Following a Disaster: A Systematic Review. PLoS Curr. 2015, 7. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4696867/ (accessed on 1 June 2021). [CrossRef]
  24. Winders, W.T.; Bustamante, N.D.; Garbern, S.C.; Bills, C.; Coker, A.; Trehan, I.; Osei-Ampofo, M.; Levine, A.C. Establishing the Effectiveness of Interventions Provided to First Responders to Prevent and/or Treat Mental Health Effects of Response to a Disaster: A Systematic Review. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2021, 15, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Doherty, A.; Benedetto, V.; Harris, C.; Boland, P.; Christian, D.L.; Hill, J.; Bhutani, G.; Clegg, A.J. The effectiveness of psychological support interventions for those exposed to mass infectious disease outbreaks: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blake, D.D.; Weathers, F.W.; Nagy, L.M.; Kaloupek, D.G.; Gusman, F.D.; Charney, D.S.; Keane, T.M. The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. J. Trauma. Stress 1995, 8, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wolmer, L.; Laor, N.; Dedeoglu, C.; Siev, J.; Yazgan, Y. Teacher-mediated intervention after disaster: A controlled three-year follow-up of children’s functioning. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2005, 46, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pynoos, R.S.; Frederick, C.; Nader, K.; Arroyo, W.; Steinberg, A.; Eth, S.; Nunez, F.; Fairbanks, L. Life threat and posttraumatic stress in school-age children. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1987, 44, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Steinmetz, S.E.; Benight, C.C.; Bishop, S.L.; James, L.E. My Disaster Recovery: A pilot randomized controlled trial of an Internet intervention. Anxiety Stress Coping 2012, 25, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Brewin, C.R.; Rose, S.; Andrews, B.; Green, J.; Tata, P.; McEvedy, C.; Turner, S.; Foa, E.B. Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry 2002, 181, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Zang, Y.; Hunt, N.; Cox, T. A randomised controlled pilot study: The effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy with adult survivors of the Sichuan earthquake. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Weiss, D.S.; Marmar, C.R. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  33. Goldberg, D.P.; Hillier, V.F. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol. Med. 1979, 9, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adams, R.E.; Laraque, D.; Chemtob, C.M.; Jensen, P.S.; Boscarino, J.A. Does a one-day educational training session influence primary care pediatricians’ mental health practice procedures in response to a community disaster? Results from the reaching children initiative (RCI). Int. J. Emerg. Ment. Health 2013, 15, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zang, Y.; Hunt, N.; Cox, T. Adapting narrative exposure therapy for Chinese earthquake survivors: A pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. BMC Psychiatry 2014, 14, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jiang, R.F.; Tong, H.Q.; Delucchi, K.L.; Neylan, T.C.; Shi, Q.; Meffert, S.M. Interpersonal psychotherapy versus treatment as usual for PTSD and depression among Sichuan earthquake survivors: A randomized clinical trial. Confl. Health 2014, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jacob, N.; Neuner, F.; Maedl, A.; Schaal, S.; Elbert, T. Dissemination of psychotherapy for trauma spectrum disorders in postconflict settings: A randomized controlled trial in Rwanda. Psychother. Psychosom. 2014, 83, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Ruggiero, K.J.; Price, M.; Adams, Z.; Stauffacher, K.; McCauley, J.; Danielson, C.K.; Knapp, R.; Hanson, R.F.; Davidson, T.M.; Amstadter, A.B.; et al. Web intervention for adolescents affected by disaster: Population-based randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2015, 54, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kilpatrick, D.G.; Ruggiero, K.J.; Acierno, R.; Saunders, B.E.; Resnick, H.S.; Best, C.L. Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2003, 71, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bass, J.; Murray, S.M.; Mohammed, T.A.; Bunn, M.; Gorman, W.; Ahmed, A.M.A.; Murray, L.; Bolton, P. A randomized controlled trial of a trauma-informed support, skills, and psychoeducation intervention for survivors of torture and related trauma in Kurdistan, Northern Iraq. Glob. Health Sci. Pract. 2016, 4, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  42. Cohen, G.H.; Tamrakar, S.; Lowe, S.; Sampson, L.; Ettman, C.; Linas, B.; Ruggiero, K.; Galea, S. Comparison of simulated treatment and cost-effectiveness of a stepped care case-finding intervention vs usual care for posttraumatic stress disorder after a natural disaster. JAMA Psychiatry 2017, 74, 1251–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Frederick, C.J.; Pynoos, R.S.; Nader, K. Reaction Index to Psychic Trauma Form C (Child); Department of Psychiatry, University of California at Los Angeles: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dawson, K.; Joscelyne, A.; Meijer, C.; Steel, Z.; Silove, D.; Bryant, R.A. A controlled trial of trauma-focused therapy versus problem-solving in Islamic children affected by civil conflict and disaster in Aceh, Indonesia. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2018, 52, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Welton-Mitchell, C.; James, L.E.; Khanal, S.N.; James, A.S. An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: A cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. James, L.E.; Welton-Mitchell, C.; Noel, J.R.; James, A.S. Integrating mental health and disaster preparedness in intervention: A randomized controlled trial with earthquake and flood-affected communities in Haiti. Psychol. Med. 2020, 50, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Semrau, M.; van Ommeren, M.; Blagescu, M.; Griekspoor, A.; Howard, L.M.; Jordans, M.; Lempp, H.; Marini, A.; Pedersen, J.; Pilotte, I.; et al. The development and psychometric properties of the humanitarian emergency settings perceived needs (HESPER) scale. Am. J. Public Health 2012, 102, e55–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zigmond, A.S.; Snaith, R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983, 67, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dhital, R.; Shibanuma, A.; Miyaguchi, M.; Kiriya, J.; Jimba, M. Effect of psycho-social support by teachers on improving mental health and hope of adolescents in an earthquake-affected district in Nepal: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Foa, E.B.; Johnson, K.M.; Feeny, N.C.; Treadwell, K.R. The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: A preliminary examination of its psychometric properties. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 2001, 30, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kılıç, N.; Şimşek, N. The effects of psychological first aid training on disaster preparedness perception and self-efficacy. Nurse Educ. Today 2019, 83, 104203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Özcan, F. Hemşirelerin Afete Hazır Olma Durumu ve Hazırlık Algısı. Doctoral Dissertation, Marmara Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sijbrandij, M.; Horn, R.; Esliker, R.; O’may, F.; Reiffers, R.; Ruttenberg, L.; Stam, K.; de Jong, J.; Ager, A. The effect of psychological first aid training on knowledge and understanding about psychosocial support principles: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hamdani, S.U.; Rahman, A.; Wang, D.; Chen, T.; van Ommeren, M.; Chisholm, D.; Farooq, S. Cost-effectiveness of WHO Problem Management Plus for adults with mood and anxiety disorders in a post-conflict area of Pakistan: Randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 2020, 217, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lotzin, A.; Hinrichsen, I.; Kenntemich, L.; Freyberg, R.C.; Lau, W.; O’Donnell, M. The SOLAR group program to promote recovery after disaster and trauma—A randomized controlled feasibility trial among German trauma survivors. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 2022, 14, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Larsen, D.L.; Attkisson, C.C.; Hargreaves, W.A.; Nguyen, T.D. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Eval. Program Plan. 1979, 2, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sterne, J.A.C.; Hernán, M.A.; Reeves, B.C.; Savović, J.; Berkman, N.D.; Viswanathan, M.; Henry, D.; Altman, D.G.; Ansari, M.T.; Boutron, I.; et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016, 355, i4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Sterne, J.A.C.; Savović, J.; Page, M.J.; Elbers, R.G.; Blencowe, N.S.; Boutron, I.; Cates, C.J.; Cheng, H.Y.; Corbett, M.S.; Eldridge, S.M.; et al. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019, 366, l4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jadad, A.R.; Moore, R.A.; Carroll, D.; Jeckinson, C.; Reynolds, D.J.; Gavaghan, D.J.; McQuay, H.J. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials 1996, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Weiss, D.S. The impact of event scale: Revised. In Cross-Cultural Assessment of Psychological Trauma and PTSD; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 219–238. [Google Scholar]
  61. Islam, M.M.; Iqbal, U.; Walther, B.; Atique, S.; Dubey, N.K.; Nguyen, P.-A.; Poly, T.N.; Masud, J.H.B.; Li, Y.-C.; Shabbir, S.-A. Benzodiazepine use and risk of dementia in the elderly population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology 2016, 47, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cohen, S.; Kamarck, T.; Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983, 24, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Birleson, P. The validity of depressive disorder in childhood and the development of a self-rating scale: A research report. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1981, 22, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gollwitzer, P.M.; Bargh, J.A. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chesney, M.A.; Neilands, T.B.; Chambers, D.B.; Taylor, J.M.; Folkman, S. A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2006, 11 Pt 3, 421–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Zimet, G.D.; Dahlem, N.W.; Zimet, S.G.; Farley, G.K. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J. Personal. Assess. 1988, 52, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Blevins, C.A.; Weathers, F.W.; Davis, M.T.; Witte, T.K.; Domino, J.L. The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. J. Trauma. Stress 2015, 28, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. First, M.B.; Gibbon, M. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders (SCID-II); American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lecrubier, Y.; Sheehan, D.V.; Weiller, E.; Amorim, P.; Bonora, I.; Sheehan, K.H.; Janavs, J.; Dunbar, G.C. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur. Psychiatry 1997, 12, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bovin, M.J.; Marx, B.P.; Weathers, F.W.; Gallagher, M.W.; Rodriguez, P.; Schnurr, P.P.; Keane, T.M. Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders–fifth edition (PCL-5) in veterans. Psychol. Assess. 2016, 28, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; Oxford Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  72. UNDRR. The Human Cost of Disasters: An Overview of the Last 20 Years (2000–2019); UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  73. McCabe, O.L.; Perry, C.; Azur, M.; Taylor, H.G.; Bailey, M.; Links, J.M. Psychological first-aid training for paraprofessionals: A systems-based model for enhancing capacity of rural emergency responses. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2011, 26, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Powell, T.; Yuma-Guerrero, P. Supporting community health workers after a disaster: Findings from a mixed-methods pilot evaluation study of a psychoeducational intervention. Dis. Med. Public Health Prep. 2016, 10, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram.
Ijerph 19 15847 g001
Figure 2. The funnel plot of subgroup of PTSD outcome studies.
Figure 2. The funnel plot of subgroup of PTSD outcome studies.
Ijerph 19 15847 g002
Figure 3. PTSD reduction with professional-delivered mental health interventions compared with PTSD reduction with control group [11,14,27,29,31,35,36,37,38,44,46].
Figure 3. PTSD reduction with professional-delivered mental health interventions compared with PTSD reduction with control group [11,14,27,29,31,35,36,37,38,44,46].
Ijerph 19 15847 g003
Table 4. Summary of Findings of RCTs.
Table 4. Summary of Findings of RCTs.
Author and Year of StudyFindings
Reduced Depression
Reduced AnxietyPTSD SymptomsSelf-EfficacyPerceived SupportOther
Steinmetz et al. (2012) [29]++N/AN/AN/AN/AWorry ++
Zang et al. (2013) [31]++++++N/AN/A
Zang et al. (2014) [31]++++++N/A++Post-traumatic growth ++
Jacob et al. (2014) [37]N/AN/A++N/AN/AFunctional impairment ++
Bass et al. (2016) [40]++++N/AN/AN/ADysfunction ++
Acarturk et al. (2016) [11]N/AN/A++N/AN/A
Basoglu et al. (2005) [14]++N/A++N/AN/AFear and avoidance ++
Jiang et al. (2014) [36]++N/A++N/AN/A
Dawson et al. (2018) [44]+N/A++N/AN/AAnger ++
James et al. (2019) [46]++++++N/AN/ADisaster preparedness ++
Ruggiero et al. (2015) [38]+N/A++N/AN/AAlcohol use +
Rahman et al. (2019) [38]++++N/AN/AN/A
Sijbrandij et al. (2019) [53]N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AKnowledge ++
Dhital et al. (2019) [49]++N/A++N/AN/A
Kilic and Şimşek (2019) [51]N/AN/AN/A++N/ADisaster preparedness ++
Hamdani et al. (2020) [54]++++N/AN/AN/AFunctional impairment ++
Lotzin et al. (2021) [55]++++N/AN/AN/AImproved coping with the problem +; social support +; quality of life +
++: significantly effective; +: effective but not significant.
Table 5. Summary characteristics of PTSD focused studies, according to study year.
Table 5. Summary characteristics of PTSD focused studies, according to study year.
Study (Year)ParticipantsMean AgeInterventionComparisonsFollow-up (Months)Outcome Measure
Başoğlu (2005) [14]N = 59, 84.7% female; 16–65 years; Turkey earthquake survivors, TSSC score higher than 20, literate.36.3SSBTWaitlist control24TSSC
Wolmer (2005) [27]N = 287, 60.6% female; children aged 9–17 years; students in three schools located in the Turkey earthquake disaster area.11.5School reactivation programNo intervention36CPTSD-RI
Steinmetz (2011) [29]N = 56, 85.7% female; Hurricane Ike survivors, had access to the Internet, and met distress criteria43.0MDRUsual care1MPSS
Zang (2013) [31]N = 22, 77.3% female; Adult earthquake survivors seeking assistance, and met the DSM-IV criteria of PTSD55.73NETWaitlist control2IES-R
Jacob (2014) [37]N = 76, 81.82% female children; Rwandan widow and orphan genocide survivorsWidow 47.55; Children 24.55NETWaitlist control6CAPS
Jiang (2014) [36]N = 49, 71.4% female; 18 years or older, able to attend weekly sessions, met criteria for PTSD with heavy exposure to earthquake29.8IPTUsual care6CAPS
Zang (2014) [35]N = 30, 93.3% female; earthquake survivor adults met the DSM-IV criteria of PTSD53.63NETWaitlist control3IES-R
Ruggiero (2015) [38]N = 987, 53.5% female; adolescents from communities affected by devastating tornadoes14.55BBNNo intervention12NSA
Acarturk (2016) [11]N = 70, 74% female; adult refugees located in Kilis Refugee Camp at the Turkish–Syrian border with a PTSD diagnosis33.7EMDRWaitlist control1IES-R
Dawson (2018) [44]N = 64, 46.9% female; 7–14 years; children living in the region affected by Aceh’s civil conflict and satisfying criteria for probable PTSD10.7CBTProblem-solving intervention3UCLA PTSD-RI
James (2019) [46]N = 480, 49.8% female; 18–78 years; community members, drawn from three disaster-affected communities37Mental health integrated disaster preparednessWaitlist control6Unstandardised regression coefficients
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, M.; Xiao, T.; Carter, B.; Chen, P.; Shearer, J. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Mental Health Interventions Delivered by Frontline Health Care Workers in Emergency Health Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15847. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315847

AMA Style

Peng M, Xiao T, Carter B, Chen P, Shearer J. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Mental Health Interventions Delivered by Frontline Health Care Workers in Emergency Health Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):15847. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315847

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Min, Tao Xiao, Ben Carter, Pan Chen, and James Shearer. 2022. "Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Mental Health Interventions Delivered by Frontline Health Care Workers in Emergency Health Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 15847. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315847

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop