Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Nitrous Oxide versus Pethidine/Midazolam for Pain Relief in Minor Gynecological Operative Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel High-Throughput Microwell Spectrophotometric Assay for One-Step Determination of Lorlatinib, a Novel Potent Drug for the Treatment of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
New Insights into the Communications of the Facial Vein with the Dural Venous Sinuses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition, Antibacterial Activity and In Vitro Anticancer Evaluation of Ochradenus baccatus Methanolic Extract
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 3
10.3390/medicina59030610
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antiproliferative Activity, Multikinase Inhibition, Apoptosis- Inducing Effects and Molecular Docking of Novel Isatin–Purine Hybrids

by
Ashwag S. Alanazi
1,*,
Tebyan O. Mirgany
2,
Aisha A. Alsfouk
1,
Nawaf A. Alsaif
2 and
Mohammed M. Alanazi
2,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 84428, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(3), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030610
Received: 8 February 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 16 March 2023 / Published: 19 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Promising Future of Anti-tumor Drugs)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The traditional single-treatment strategy for cancer is frequently unsuccessful due to the complexity of cellular signaling. However, suppression of multiple targets is vital to defeat tumor cells. In this research, new compounds for the treatment of cancer were developed successfully as novel hybrid anticancer agents. Based on a molecular hybridization strategy, we designed hybrid agents that target multiple protein kinases to fight cancer cells. The proposed hybrid agents combined purine and isatin moieties in their structures with 4-aminobenzohydrazide and hydrazine as different linkers. Having those two moieties in one molecule enabled the capability to inhibit multiple kinases, such as human epidermal receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2). Anticancer activity was evaluated by performing cytotoxicity assays, kinase inhibition assays, cell cycle analysis, and BAX, Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 protein level determination assays. The results showed that the designed hybrids tackled the cancer by inhibiting both cell proliferation and metastasis. A molecular docking study was performed to predict possible binding interactions in the active site of the investigated protein kinase enzymes.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one of the most serious diseases, and the second leading cause of death. It is described by overexcited and uncontrolled cell proliferation [1]. Around one third of the population worldwide is expected to be diagnosed with cancer during their lifetimes [2]. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, in 2018 about 18.1 million people were diagnosed with cancer and around 9.6 million people died of the disease. It is estimated that the morbidity and mortality of cancer will continue to rise, with cancer cases growing to 24.1 million new cases and 13.0 million deaths by 2030 [3]. When an appropriate treatment strategy is provided, around two thirds of human cancers can be treated effectively [4]. The development of treatment resistance is the major obstacle to successful cancer therapy. The most effective therapies frequently fail to result in a thorough tumor response, and eventually end up with treatment resistance and tumor deterioration [5]. Therefore, continuous exploration of novel anticancer agents with low toxicity and high efficiency against both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancers are still imperative goals for the research and development of anticancer drugs [6]. Additionally, treating cancer patients with more than one drug has a number of negative consequences. These consequences can be avoided by using a single drug with multiple molecular targets, which nowadays is a much-preferred therapeutic strategy [7,8,9].
PTKs (protein tyrosine kinases) are crucial enzymes in cell proliferation [10]. PTKs phosphorylate amino acid residues in proteins, inducing a folding change in the proteins’ 3D structure that ultimately affects protein function [11]. PTKs have a critical role in the development and progression of cancer. PTK dysfunction is implicated in most cancer disorders [1]. Furthermore, PTKs produce more than 60% of all key oncoproteins and proto-oncoproteins in cancer disease [11]. Therefore, PTKs are a good target for cancer therapy for medicinal chemists and biologists.
Human epidermal growth factor receptors (HERs), also known as HER/ErbB, are a tyrosine kinase transmembrane receptor family that includes members such as EGFR (HER1), HER2, HER3, and HER4 [12]. These receptors have three domains: an extracellular ligand binding domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. The tyrosine kinase receptors are key proteins in cancer development, including cell overexpression and inadequate suppression in a variety of human tumor cells [5]. Abnormal HER family signaling facilitates invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis. Many cancer cells, including ovarian, prostate, colon, and breast cancer cells, have been linked to overexpressed EGFR and HER2 receptors. Therefore, inhibiting the overexpression of these receptors leads to apoptosis in a variety of solid tumors, including breast and lung cancer [13] tumors.
Cancer angiogenesis is a fundamental step for tumor growth because it assures the supply of oxygen and nutrients to proliferating cells by forming new blood vessels, which can lead to cancer progression and metastasis [14]. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) are also PTKs, and have been identified as an outstanding therapeutic target for developing new anticancer agents [15,16]. Among the class of VEGFRs, VEGFR-2 has a critical role in tumor angiogenesis. The expression of VEGFR-2 in endothelial cells of the tumor vasculature is much greater than its expression in normal endothelial cells [17]. Overexpressed VEGFR-2 is found in a variety of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer. Thus, EGFR, HER2 and VEGFR2 are important targets for anticancer drug design and development [18].
Isatin-bearing (indole-2,3-dione) compounds have a broad spectrum of pharmacological activities, including antibacterial, antimalarial, antitubercular, and anticancer activities. Isatin derivatives have the potential to modulate multiple biological targets, such as histone deacetylase, β-carbonic anhydrase, tyrosine kinase, phosphodiesterase 4B, and tubulin, changing the expression of particular apoptosis-related genes and eventually causing apoptosis [19]. Furthermore, several potent antitumor agents, such as semaxanib and sunitinib, contain an isatin scaffold (Figure 1), demonstrating that isatin is an effective moiety for the development of novel anticancer agents [20]. On the other hand, purine-containing compounds such as I and II (Figure 1) were also found to be good anticancer agents due to their multitarget effects, including the inhibition of the activity of CDKs, EGFR, VEGFR2, HDAC, mTOR, MAPK and MNK [21,22,23,24,25,26,27].

Aim of the Study

Each cell represents various genetic makeups, due to differences in the active oncogenes and inactive tumor suppressor genes. A single drug may successfully destroy cells holding a specific alteration while cells driven by other stimulants persist [28]. The complexity of cellular signaling frequently makes the traditional single-treatment strategy unsuccessful, and suppression of multiple targets is vital for defeating tumor cells [29,30]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop new drugs with inhibiting effects on cancer cell overexpression. Hybrid compounds were designed (Figure 2) that combine distinct parts from two anticancer agents: isatin-bearing (indole-2,3-dione) compounds and purine-containing compounds. Both parts have been used with FDA-approved drugs. Indeed, isatin–purine hybrid molecules may have the potential to suppress tumor activity, and therefore may provide novel anticancer agents with several molecular targets.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

In the design of isatin–purine hybrid compounds 4–9, isatin and purine were linked using 4-aminobenzohydrazide as a linker, while isatin–purine hybrid compounds 11–16 were linked using hydrazine as a linker.
First, ethyl 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzoate 2 (Scheme 1) was obtained from a reaction of ethyl 4-aminobenzoate with a solution of 6-chloro-9H-purine in absolute ethanol. The reaction mixture was stirred during reflux for 7 h and the desired product was filtered and washed with cold water. The intermediate (2) was obtained with a yield of 97.38% and fully characterized by 1H NMR and LCMS to be used for the next step.
Next, ethyl 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzoate 2 (Scheme 1) was refluxed in an excess of hydrazine hydrate for 3 h. The mixture was cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The resultant precipitate was filtered, washed thoroughly with water and dried to obtain the desired product, 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzohydrazide 3. The intermediate 3 was obtained with a yield of 84.15% and fully characterized by 1H NMR and LCMS to be used for the next step.
Synthesis of the final compounds 4–9 (Scheme 1) started with mixing 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzohydrazide 3, the appropriate isatin, and glacial acetic acid in absolute ethanol and refluxing for about 8–12 h. The reaction mixture was cooled and added to ice water, and the formed precipitate was filtered off, washed with water and recrystallized from the proper solvent to obtain the desired compounds. The final compounds were obtained with a yield of 70.72 to 97.08% and fully characterized by 1H NMR and LCMS.
For the second series, 6-hydrazinyl-9H-purine 10 was synthesized first (Scheme 1) by refluxing 6-chloro-9H-purine in an excess of hydrazine hydrate for 1 h. The mixture was cooled and poured into ice cold water. The resultant precipitate was filtered, washed thoroughly with water and dried to obtain the intermediate 10. The intermediate 10 was obtained with yield 80.44% and fully characterized by 1H NMR and LCMS to be used for the next step.
Compounds 11–16 (Scheme 1) were synthesized by following the same procedure as for compounds 4–9, using 6-hydrazinyl-9H-purine 10, the appropriate isatin, and glacial acetic acid in absolute ethanol. The reaction was refluxed for about 3–7 h, then cooled and added to ice water. The formed precipitate was filtered off, washed with water and recrystallized from the proper solvent to obtain the desired compounds. The final compounds were obtained with a yield of 72.46 to 99.5% and fully characterized by 1H NMR and LCMS (Supplementary Data).

2.2. Biological Evaluation

2.2.1. Cytotoxicity Assay

The in vitro antiproliferative activity of the synthesized hybrid compounds 4–9 (isatin–purine hybrid compounds with 4-aminobenzohydrazide spacer) and 11–16 (isatin–purine hybrid compounds with hydrazine spacer) was preliminarily assessed using an MTT colorimetric assay against four human cancer cell lines: hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), mammary gland cancer (MCF-7), breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and epithelioid cervix carcinoma (HeLa). The cytotoxic activities of the evaluated compounds are expressed as IC50 values (µM), as shown in (Table 1). Sunitinib, a well-known multi-kinase inhibitor, was used as a reference compound. The tested compounds showed varying degrees of antiproliferative activities against the examined cell lines compared to the reference compound. In general, compounds 11–16 showed better cytotoxic activity profiles (IC50 ≥ 8.93 ± 0.8) than compounds 4–9 (IC50 ≥ 19.05 ± 1.4 μM) against all tested cancer cell lines except for compound 6 (R=F), which demonstrated better activity than the corresponding compound in the second series (compounds 11–16). Compounds 6, 8, 12, 13, 14 and 15 demonstrated good antiproliferative activity against all investigated cell lines, with IC50 values ranging from 18.06 to 53.49 μM. Intestinally, Compound 15 (R = methoxy) was very potent and displayed highly promising cytotoxic activity against all tested cell lines, with IC50 values ranging from 8.93 to 14.89 μM. Additionally, compound 15 demonstrated cytotoxic activity comparable to the reference drug sunitinib against the HepG2, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cell lines, with IC50 values of 9.61, 10.78, 14.89 and 8.93 μM, respectively. On the other hand, the remaining compounds revealed only modest inhibitory activities against the tested cell lines.

2.2.2. Structure–Activity Relationship (SAR)

The structure–activity relationships of the tested isatin–purine hybrid compounds towards HepG2, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cell lines revealed that most of the compounds 11–16 with a hydrazine linker showed more potent cytotoxic activity against all tested cell lines than compounds 4–9 with a 4-aminobenzohydrazide linker. This may be because the shorter linker gives compounds better fit and interaction with the targeted kinases. However, compound 6, with 4-aminobenzohydrazide and R=F, showed more potent activity against the MDA-MB-231 cell line than compound 13, which has the same R substitution and hydrazine. However, introducing a F group into both 4-aminobenzohydrazide and hydrazine compounds led to better cytotoxicity compared to most other compounds in each series. This may be because the F group was able to form a hydrogen bond during the interaction with the receptors.
In addition, compound 15, with a hydrazine linker and R=OCH3, was the most potent cytotoxic agent against all tested cancer cell lines. The potency of compound 15 may be due to the fact that hydrazine is a short linker and the methoxy group was able to form a hydrogen bond with the targeted site in the kinase enzymes.

2.2.3. In Vitro Kinase Inhibitory Activity

The newly prepared compound 15 was further assayed for its inhibitory activity against EGFR, HER2, VEGFR2 and CDK2. The results were reported as 50% inhibition concentration values (IC50, expressed as μM) in comparison to erlotinib, roscovitine, sorafenib and lapatinib as reference drugs (Table 2). Interestingly, the reported kinase inhibition results for compound 15 were compatible with that of the cytotoxicity assays (Table 1). This may explain the possible mechanism of cytotoxic action for the designed isatin–purine hybrid compounds. Furthermore, compound 15 exhibited inhibitory activities in the nanomolar ranges comparable to the positive controls against the four investigated protein kinases, with Her2 being the most sensitive, followed by EGFR, VEGFR2 and CDK2. The IC50 values of the kinase inhibitory activities were 0.15, 0.143, 0.534 and 0.192 μM, respectively.

2.2.4. Molecular Docking

Compound 15 was docked in the active sites of EGFR, VEGFR2 and Her2 to rationalize its biological activity and to predict the possible types of drug–receptor interactions. Erlotinib, sorafenib and lapatinib were used as reference compounds, as they are the co-crystallized ligands in EGFR, VEGFR2 and Her2, respectively. Erlotinib was stabilized by a hydrogen bond with Met769 in the active site of EGFR. In addition, erlotinib had several hydrophobic interactions with Lys721, Val702, Ala719, Leu820 and Leu694, and two van der Waals interactions with Thr830 and Met769. On the other hand, compound 15 was stabilized by two hydrogen bonds between Met769 and the amide of the isatin moiety. Furthermore, compound 15 had multiple hydrophobic interactions with Ala719, Leu764, Thr766, Lys721, Thr830, Val702, Leu694 and Leu820 (Figure 3). The binding affinities for erlotinib and compound 15 with the EGFR were −9.5 and −8.9 Kcal/mol, respectively. Sorafenib, the reference compound for the docking experiment for VEGFR2, produced key interactions in the active site of VEGFR2 by forming hydrogen bonds with Cys919 (two hydrogen bonds), Asp1046 and Glu885, and several other types of interactions with the pocket’s amino acid residues. The hydrazine spacer of compound 15 formed a hydrogen bond with Asp1046, while fifteen hydrophobic interactions stabilized the compound in the active site of VEGFR2 (Figure 4). The binding affinities for sorafenib and compound 15 with VEGFR2 were −11.9 and −9.3 Kcal/mol, respectively. Regarding Her2, lapatinib formed three hydrogen bonds with amino acid residues, Met801, Thr798 and Thr862, and three halogen bonds with Ser783 (two) and Arg784 (one), and also had hydrophobic interactions with Leu800, Leu852, Met801, Ala751, Gln799, Ser783, Phe864, Arg784, Leu785, Leu796, Val 734 and Lys753. In contrast, Compound 15 bound the active site with two hydrogen bonds with Lys753 and The862, and had hydrophobic interactions with Ala751, Leu796, Lys753, Thr862, val734 and Leu 852 (Figure 5). The binding affinities for lapatinib and compound 15 with Her2 were −9.8 and −8.7 Kcal/mol, respectively.

2.2.5. Cell Cycle Analysis and Apoptosis Rate

In addition, the cell cycle progression assay as described by Wang et al. [31,32] was used to investigate the effect of compound 15 in HepG2 cells. The biological effect of compound 15 was measured by treating HepG2 cells with 9.61 μM of the compound for 24 h. The compound’s effect on cell cycle distribution was analyzed by comparing with untreated control cells (Table 3, Figure 6). The results showed a massive accumulation of the treated HepG2 cells at the pre-G1 (21.47%, 10-fold) compared to the control cells (2.02%), revealed by flow cytometric analysis.
On the other hand, an Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) double staining assay was conducted to identify the mode of cell death promoted by compound 15 (9.61 μM) following 24 h incubation with HepG2 cells. The results, in Table 4 and Figure 7, showed a notable increase in apoptotic cells in early-stage (0.38% to 1.86%) and late-stage (0.19% to 12.58%) apoptosis in the HepG2 cell line as compared to the controls. These results of the apoptosis induction effect, along with the previous results of cell cycle arrest, indicated the potential anti-cancer effect of compound 15.

2.2.6. BAX and Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 Level Protein Assays

We also investigated the effect of compound 15, which was the most active compound, on protein expression levels of BAX, Bcl-2 Caspase 3 and Caspase 9. In these assays, compound 15 was used at its cytotoxic concentration (9.61 μM) and incubated with HepG2 cells for 24 h. The results showed an increase in the level of BAX, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 proteins, with 3.36-, 3.90- and 3.11-fold increases, respectively, compared to the control cells (Table 5). In addition, Bcl-2 protein levels in the HepG2 cell significantly decreased, by 2.30-fold, after treatment with compound 15, which affected the apoptosis pathway compared to the control.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry and Analysis

The 1H NMR spectrum was recorded with a Bruker 700 MHz NMR spectrometer in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm, and J values are reported in Hz. The following abbreviations were used in reporting spectrum data: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), dd (doublet of doublets), td (triplet of doublets), and m (multiplet). An Agilent 6320 Ion Trap mass spectrometer (Agilent Technology, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to obtain the mass spectra for all compounds.

3.1.1. General Procedure A for Synthesis of Compounds 4–9

A mixture of 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzohydrazide (0.2 gm, 0.7 mmol), the appropriate isatin (0.7 mmol), and glacial acetic acid (1 mL) in absolute ethanol (20 mL) was refluxed for about 8 h. The reaction was then cooled and added to ice water. Afterwards, the resultant solid was filtered, rinsed with water and recrystallized from a proper organic solvent to achieve the desired compounds [19].

3.1.2. General Procedure B for Synthesis of Compounds 11–16

A mixture of 6-hydrazinyl-9H-purine 0.3 gm, 2 mmol), the appropriate isatin (0.7 mmol), and glacial acetic acid (1 mL) in absolute ethanol (20 mL) was refluxed for about 3–7 h. The reaction was then cooled and added to ice water. Afterwards, the resultant solid was filtered, rinsed with water and recrystallized from a proper organic solvent to obtain the desired compounds [19,33,34].
  • Ethyl 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzoate (2)
Ethyl 4-aminobenzoate (26 mmol) was added to a solution of 6-chloro-9H-purine (13 mmol) in absolute ethanol (25 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred during reflux for 7 h. The solid obtained was filtered and washed with cold water to obtain the final product [34]. Yield 97.38%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.00 (s,1H), 10.21 (s, 1H), 8.49 (s, 1H), 8.37 (s, 1H), 8.19 (d, 2H), 7.94 (d, 2H), 4.78–3.90 (m, 2H), 1.59–0.97 (m, 3H). LC-MS m/z 281.9 (M−) 284.1 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C14H13N5O2 (283.10): C, 59.36; H, 4.63; N, 24.72; Found C, 59.05; H, 4.56; N, 24.91%.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzohydrazide (3)
Ethyl 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)benzoate (5 mmol) was refluxed in an excess of hydrazine hydrate for 3 h. The mixture was cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The resultant precipitate was filtered, washed thoroughly with water and dried to o the product [33]. Yield 84.14%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO): δ 13.19 (s, 1H), 10.03 (s, 1H), 9.63 (s, 1H), 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 8.08–8.07 (d, 2H), 7.82–7.80 (d, 2H), 4.44 (s, 2H). LC-MS m/z 267.9 (M−) 270.0 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C14H13N5O2 (269.10): C, 53.53; H, 4.12; N, 36.41; Found C, 53.17; H, 4.35; N 36.16, %.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)-N’-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazide (4)
Synthesized according to general procedure A. Yield 90.20%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.97 (s, 1H), 13.29 (m, 1H), 11.48 (m, 1H), 10.28 (m, 1H), 8.61–8.16 (m, 5H), 7.89 (m, 1H), 7.63 (m, 1H), 7.41 (m, 1H), 7.13 (m, 1H), 6.96 (m, 1H). LC-MS m/z 396.9 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C20H14N8O2 (398.12): C, 60.30; H, 3.54; N, 28.13; Found C, 59.88; H, 3.42; N, 27.85%.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)-N’-(5-chloro-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazide (5)
Synthesized according to general procedure A. Yield 70.72%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.51 (m, 1H), 11.52 (s, 1H), 10.29 (d, 2H), 8.76–6.59 (m, 9H). LC-MS m/z 430.9 (M−); C20H13ClN8O2 (432.08): C, 55.50; H, 3.03; N, 25.89; Found C, 55.75; H, 3.18; N, 25.61%.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)-N’-(5-fluoro-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazide (6)
Synthesized according to general procedure A. Yield 97.08%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.98 (s, 1H), 13.30 (d, 1H), 11.42 (s, 1H), 10.29 (d, 1H), 8.83–8.20 (m, 3H), 7.95 (m, 3H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 6.96 (m, 1H). LC-MS m/z 414.9 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C20H13FN8O2 (416.11): C, 57.69; H, 3.15; N, 26.91; Found C,57.42; H, 3.13; N, 26.81%.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)-N’-(5-methyl-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazide (7)
Synthesized according to general procedure A. Yield 75.83%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.88 (m, 1H), 13.23 (m, 1H), 11.40 (m, 1H), 10.72 (s, 1H), 10.20 (m, 1H), 8.47 (m, 1H), 8.42–8.17 (m, 2H), 8.13–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 7.38–7.04 (m, 1H), 6.85 (m, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H). LC-MS m/z 411.0 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C21H16N8O2 (412.14): C, 61.16; H, 3.91; N, 27.17; Found C, 60.82; H, 3.83; N, 26.98%.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)-N’-(5-methoxy-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazide (8)
Synthesized according to general procedure A. Yield 96.82%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 14.04 (s, 1H), 13.30 (d, 1H), 11.22 (s, 1H), 10.48–10.09 (m, 1H), 8.83–7.61 (m, 6H), 7.17 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3). LC-MS m/z 426.9 (M−); Anal. Calcd. For C21H16N8O3 (428.13): C, 58.88; H, 3.76; N, 26.16; Found C, 59.13; H, 3.90; N, 26.33%.
  • 4-((9H-purin-6-yl)amino)-N’-(5-nitro-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzohydrazide (9)
Synthesized according to general procedure A. Yield 79.83%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.77 (s, 1H), 13.30 (m, 2H), 12.00 (d, 2H), 10.05 (s, 1H), 8.50–7.98 (m, 7H). LC-MS m/z 441.9 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C20H13N9O4 (443.11): C, 54.18; H, 2.96; N, 28.43; Found C, 54.44; H, 3.13; N, 28.22%.
  • 6-hydrazineyl-9H-purine (10)
6-chloro-9H-purine (10 mmol) was refluxed in an excess of hydrazine hydrate for 1 h. The mixture was cooled and poured into ice-cold water. The resultant precipitate was filtered, washed thoroughly with water and dried to obtain the product [33]. Yield 82.23%; m.p. 261–262 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.94 (s, 1H), 12.22 (s, 1H), 9.15–8.40 (m, 1H), 8.40–7.81 (m, 1H), 4.32 (m, 1H), 1.37–1.03 (m, 1H).LC-MS m/z 149.0 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C5H6N6 (150.1): C, 40.00; H, 4.03; N, 55.97; Found C, 39.55; H, 3.91; N, 55.66%.
  • (E)-3-(2-(9H-purin-6-yl)hydrazineylidene)indolin-2-one (11)
Synthesized according to general procedure B. Yield 88.33%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.54 (s, 1H), 11.29 (s, 1H), 10.53 (s, 1H), 8.67 (s, 1H), 8.31 (m, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.34 (m, 1H), 7.20–6.76 (m, 2H).LC-MS m/z 277.9 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C13H9N7O (279.1): C, 55.91; H, 3.25; N, 35.11; Found C, 56.17; H, 3.29; N, 35.34%.
  • (E)-3-(2-(9H-purin-6-yl)hydrazineylidene)-5-chloroindolin-2-one (12)
Synthesized according to general procedure B. Yield 99.5%; m.p. 296–298 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.67 (s, 1H), 11.40 (s, 1H), 10.65 (s, 1H), 8.87–7.91 (m, 3H), 7.56–7.17 (m, 1H), 6.93 (m, 1H). LC-MS m/z 311.8 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C13H8ClN7O (313.04): C, 49.77; H, 2.57; N, 31.26; Found C, 49.49; H, 2.40; N, 31.39%.
  • (E)-3-(2-(9H-purin-6-yl)hydrazineylidene)-5-fluoroindolin-2-one (13)
Synthesized according to general procedure B. Yield 97.94%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.22 (s, 1H), 12.59 (s, 1H), 11.31 (s, 1H), 8.57 (d, 1H), 8.19 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.09 (m, 1H), 6.91 (m, 1H). LC-MS m/z 295.9 (M−) 298.1 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C13H8FN7O (297.1): C, 52.53; H, 2.71; N, 32.98; Found C, 52.90; H, 2.58; N, 32.57%.
  • (E)-3-(2-(9H-purin-6-yl)hydrazineylidene)-5-methylindolin-2-one (14)
Synthesized according to general procedure B. Yield 93.69%; m.p. 294–296 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.39 (m, 1H), 11.18 (m, 1H), 10.49 (m, 1H), 9.12–7.88 (m, 3H), 7.34–6.98 (m, 1H), 6.81 (m, 1H), 2.42–2.23 (m, 3H). LC-MS m/z 291.9 (M−) 294.1 (M+); Anal. Anal. Calcd. for C14H11N7O (293.1): C, 57.33; H, 3.78; N, 33.43; Found C, 57.61; H, 4.05; N, 33.29%.
  • (E)-3-(2-(9H-purin-6-yl)hydrazineylidene)-5-methoxyindolin-2-one (15)
Synthesized according to general procedure B. Yield 95.19%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.53 (s, 1H), 11.43–10.82 (m, 1H), 10.43 (m, 1H), 8.54 (m, 1H), 8.17 (m, 1H), 7.30–6.32 (m, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H). LC-MS m/z 307.9 (M−) 310.1 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C14H11N7O2 (309.1): C, 54.37; H, 3.58; N, 31.70; Found C, 54.61; H, 3.64; N, 31.58%.
  • (E)-3-(2-(9H-purin-6-yl)hydrazineylidene)-5-nitroindolin-2-one (16)
Synthesized according to general procedure B. Yield 72.46%; m.p. > 300 °C; 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.67 (s, 1H), 11.40 (s, 1H), 10.65 (s, 1H), 8.87–7.91 (m, 3H), 7.56–7.17 (m, 1H), 6.93 (m, 1H). LC-MS m/z 322.9 (M−); Anal. Calcd. for C13H8N8O3 (324.1): C, 48.15; H, 2.49; N, 34.56; Found C, 47.82; H, 2.23; N, 34.30%.

3.2. Biological Evaluation

3.2.1. Cytotoxicity Assay

Following the reported method [35], the cytotoxicity of the synthesized 12 compounds, in addition to Sunitinib and Doxorubicin, was evaluated using an MTT assay against HePG-2, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cancer cell lines. The cells were seeded in an RPMI-11640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and an antibiotic cocktail of 100 μL/mL streptomycin and 100 units/mL penicillin. Cancer cell lines were cultured separately in 96-well plates at a concentration of 1.0 × 104 cells/well at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 100% relative humidity. After incubation for 48 h, the cells were treated with different concentrations of the synthesized hybrid compounds for 24 h. After the addition of 20 μL MTT (5 mg/mL), the plates were incubated for 4 h and then 100 μL Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well to dissolve the insoluble purple formazan formed. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a BioTek EXL 800 plate reader (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The relative cell viability percentage was calculated as (A570 of treated samples/A570 of untreated sample) × 100.

3.2.2. In Vitro CDK2, EGFR, Her2, and VEGFR-2 Enzyme Assays

Compound 15 was evaluated for inhibitory activity against EGFR, VEGFR-2, Her2 and CDK2. A human ELISA kit (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) for each of the above-mentioned protein kinase enzymes was used in this assay. First, a specific antibody for each enzyme was added separately to a 96-well plate, and 100 μL of the standard solution or the compound 15 was added. The mixture was then incubated at room temperature for 2.5 h, after which the wells were washed and 100 μL of the prepared biotin antibody was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After another washing step, 100 μL of streptavidin solution was added and incubated for 45 min at room temperature. The wells were then washed for a third time and 100 μL of TMB Substrate reagent was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, 50 μL of the stop solution was added, and the absorbance was read immediately at 450 nm. A standard curve was plotted showing concentration on the X-axis and absorbance on the Y-axis [14,36,37,38,39].

3.2.3. Flow Cytometry Analysis for Cell Cycle

Flow cytometry analysis was carried out using an ab139418 Propidium Iodide flow cytometry kit/BD to detect the effect of the synthesized compound 15 on cell cycle distribution. First, HepG2 cell were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 105/well and incubated for 24 h. HepG2 cells were then treated with 9.61 µM of compound 15 for 24 h. The treated cells were then fixed in 70% ethanol for 12 h at 4 °C, rinsed with cold PBS, incubated with 100 μL RNase A for 0.5 h at 37 °C, and stained with Propidium Iodide (400 μL) in the dark at RT for an extra 0.5 h. The stained cells were determined utilizing Epics XLMCL™ flow cytometer equipment (Beckman Coulter, Apeldoorn, Netherlands), and the results were collected and analyzed using Flowing software (version 2.5.1, Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Turku, Finland).

3.2.4. Flow Cytometry Analysis for Apoptosis

Flow cytometry cell apoptosis analysis was conducted to examine the apoptotic effect of the synthesized compounds using the Annexin V-FITC cell apoptosis detection kit (Biovision, K101-100). First, HepG2 cells in a density of 2 × 105 were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The cells were then treated with 9.61 µM compound 15 for 24 h. The treated cells were then detached with trypsin (5 min, 37 °C), collected by centrifugation (5 min, 300× g), washed twice with PBS, and resuspended in 0.1 mL of a 1X binding buffer. After that, the cells were double-stained with 5 μL Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL PI in the dark at room temperature for 15 min. The stained cells were evaluated using an Epics XL-MCL™ Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Apeldoorn, Netherlands) with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm, and the data were interpreted using the Flowing software (version 2.5.1, Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Turku, Finland).

3.2.5. Determination of BAX, Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 Levels

HepG2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates in triplicate and incubated for 24 h. The incubated cells were then treated with compound 15 at different concentrations. Cells treated with 0.1% DMSO (V/V) served as control. After 24 h incubation, caspase 3 and 9, BAX and Bcl-2 levels were determined using ELISA assay kits KHO1091 (InvitrogenTM, Grand Island, NY, USA), EIA-4860 (DRU International INC., Mountainside, NJ, USA), EIA-4487 (DRU International INC., Mountainside, NJ, USA) and 99-0042 (InvitrogenTM, Grand Island, NY, USA), respectively, according to the manufacturers’ procedures.

3.2.6. Molecular Docking

The PDB Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org, (accessed on 25 December 2022) was utilized to obtain the X-ray crystal structures of the EGFR kinase domain in complex with erlotinib (PDB ID: 4HJO), the VEGFR2 kinase domain in complex with sorafenib (PDB ID:4ASD) and the kinase domain of human HER2 (PDB ID: 3RCD) in complex with lapatinib. The Discovery Studio, AutoDock Tools, Vina, and PyRx (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) software programs were used for docking simulations. First, the protein crystal structures were prepared by removing all additional molecules such as water, ligands, and sulfate. The generated data was saved in PDB file format. Second, AutoDock Tools was used to add polar hydrogens to the previous file saved in the PDB format, and the data were saved in PDBQT format. Third, using Discovery Studio, the co-crystallized ligands were separated from the protein structure and saved in a PDB file. Compound 15 was also saved in a PDB file. A grid box was employed to eliminate nonspecific binding interactions and minimize docking time. Finally, PyRx was used to perform the docking simulations, while the lowest energy pose of compound 15 superimposed with the co-crystallized ligands was used to study the interaction with the kinase enzyme.

4. Conclusions

Isatin–purine hybrid compounds were designed, synthesized and biologically evaluated successfully. Some of these compounds showed potency comparable to the reference compounds in inhibiting cell proliferation against HepG2, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cell lines. In particular, compound 15, with a methoxy substitution and a hydrazine linker, retained good activity in the nanomolar range in the inhibition of EGFR, Her2, VEGFR2 and CDK2 compared to the reference compounds. In addition, cell cycle analysis and BAX, Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 protein level determination assays indicated the apoptosis-inducing effect of compound 15. Overall, this work presents the isatin–purine hybrid compounds as novel compounds targeting multi-kinases that may prove useful in the discovery of new anticancer therapeutics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medicina59030610/s1; 1HNMR and Mass spectra for compound 4–16.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.A. and A.S.A.; methodology, T.O.M., A.S.A. and M.M.A.; software, A.S.A. and N.A.A.; investigation, A.S.A., T.O.M. and A.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.A. and M.M.A.; writing—review and editing, A.S.A.; project administration, M.M.A. and A.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Research Funding Program, Grant No. (FRP-1443-28).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Research Funding Program, Grant No. (FRP-1443-28).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alanazi, M.M.; Mahdy, H.A.; Alsaif, N.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Alkahtani, H.M.; Al-Mehizia, A.A.; Alsubaie, S.M.; Dahab, M.A.; Eissa, I.H. New Bis([1,2,4]Triazolo)[4,3-a:3′,4′-c]Quinoxaline Derivatives as VEGFR-2 Inhibitors and Apoptosis Inducers: Design, Synthesis, in Silico Studies, and Anticancer Evaluation. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 112, 104949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alanazi, M.M.; Aldawas, S.; Alsaif, N.A. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 2-Mercaptobenzoxazole Derivatives as Potential Multi-Kinase Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Cancer Statistics for the Year 2020: An Overview. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. AACR Cancer Progress Report—Cancer Progress Report. Available online: https://cancerprogressreport.aacr.org/progress/ (accessed on 3 August 2021).
  5. El-Azab, A.S.; Abdel-Aziz, A.A.M.; AlSaif, N.A.; Alkahtani, H.M.; Alanazi, M.M.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Eskandrani, R.O.; Alharbi, A. Antitumor Activity, Multitarget Mechanisms and Molecular Docking Studies of Quinazoline Derivatives Based on a Benzenesulfonamide Scaffold: Cell Cycle Analysis. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 104, 104345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alsaif, N.A.; Dahab, M.A.; Alanazi, M.M.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Al-Mehizia, A.A.; Alanazi, M.M.; Aldawas, S.; Mahdy, H.A.; Elkady, H. New Quinoxaline Derivatives as VEGFR-2 Inhibitors with Anticancer and Apoptotic Activity: Design, Molecular Modeling, and Synthesis. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 110, 104807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Szakács, G.; Paterson, J.K.; Ludwig, J.A.; Booth-Genthe, C.; Gottesman, M.M. Targeting Multidrug Resistance in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fu, R.G.; Sun, Y.; Sheng, W.B.; Liao, D.F. Designing Multi-Targeted Agents: An Emerging Anticancer Drug Discovery Paradigm. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 136, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdel-Aziz, A.A.-M.; El-Azab, A.S.; AlSaif, N.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Al-Obaid, A.M.; Al-Suwaidan, I.A. Synthesis, Potential Antitumor Activity, Cell Cycle Analysis, and Multitarget Mechanisms of Novel Hydrazones Incorporating a 4-Methylsulfonylbenzene Scaffold: A Molecular Docking Study. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021, 36, 1521–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Schlesinger, J.; Ullricht, A. Growth Factor Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Review. Neuron 1992, 9, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hanks, S.K.; Quinn, A.M.; Hunter, T. The Protein Kinase Family: Conserved Features and Deduced Phylogeny of the Catalytic Domains. Science 1988, 241, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. El-Husseiny, W.M.; El-Sayed, M.A.A.; El-Azab, A.S.; AlSaif, N.A.; Alanazi, M.M.; Abdel-Aziz, A.A.M. Synthesis, Antitumor Activity, and Molecular Docking Study of 2-Cyclopentyloxyanisole Derivatives: Mechanistic Study of Enzyme Inhibition. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 744–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Alkahtani, H.M.; Abdalla, A.N.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Alanazi, M.M.; Almehizia, A.A.; Alanazi, M.G.; Ahmed, A.Y.; Alwassil, O.I.; Darwish, H.W.; Abdel-Aziz, A.A.M.; et al. Synthesis, Cytotoxic Evaluation, and Molecular Docking Studies of Novel Quinazoline Derivatives with Benzenesulfonamide and Anilide Tails: Dual Inhibitors of EGFR/HER2. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 95, 103461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fontanella, C.; Ongaro, E.; Bolzonello, S.; Guardascione, M.; Fasola, G.; Aprile, G. Clinical Advances in the Development of Novel VEGFR2 Inhibitors. Ann. Transl. Med. 2014, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  16. Alanazi, M.M.; Elkady, H.; Alsaif, N.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Alkahtani, H.M.; Alanazi, M.M.; Alharbi, M.A.; Eissa, I.H.; Dahab, M.A. New Quinoxaline-Based VEGFR-2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, and Antiproliferative Evaluation with in Silico Docking, ADMET, Toxicity, and DFT Studies. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 30315–30328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alanazi, M.M.; Eissa, I.H.; Alsaif, N.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Alanazi, W.A.; Alasmari, A.F.; Albassam, H.; Elkady, H.; Elwan, A. Design, Synthesis, Docking, ADMET Studies, and Anticancer Evaluation of New 3-Methylquinoxaline Derivatives as VEGFR-2 Inhibitors and Apoptosis Inducers. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021, 36, 1760–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alanazi, M.M.; Alaa, E.; Alsaif, N.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Alkahtani, H.M.; Al-Mehizia, A.A.; Alsubaie, S.M.; Taghour, M.S.; Eissa, I.H. Discovery of New 3-Methylquinoxalines as Potential Anti-Cancer Agents and Apoptosis Inducers Targeting VEGFR-2: Design, Synthesis, and in Silico Studies. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021, 36, 1732–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alkahtani, H.M.; Alanazi, M.M.; Aleanizy, F.S.; Alqahtani, F.Y.; Alhoshani, A.; Alanazi, F.E.; Almehizia, A.A.; Abdalla, A.N.; Alanazi, M.G.; El-Azab, A.S.; et al. Synthesis, Anticancer, Apoptosis-Inducing Activities and EGFR and VEGFR2 Assay Mechanistic Studies of 5,5-Diphenylimidazolidine-2,4-Dione Derivatives: Molecular Docking Studies. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Al-Sanea, M.M.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Shaker, M.E.; Chilingaryan, G.; Alanazi, M.M.; Alsaif, N.A.; Alkahtani, H.M.; Alsubaie, S.A.; Abdelgawad, M.A. A New CDK2 Inhibitor with 3-Hydrazonoindolin-2-One Scaffold Endowed with Anti-Breast Cancer Activity: Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and In Silico Insights. Molecules 2021, 26, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mohamed, A.R.; El Kerdawy, A.M.; George, R.F.; Georgey, H.H.; Abdel Gawad, N.M. Design, Synthesis and in Silico Insights of New 7,8-Disubstituted-1,3-Dimethyl-1H-Purine-2,6(3H,7H)-Dione Derivatives with Potent Anticancer and Multi-Kinase Inhibitory Activities. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, X.; Han, C.; Wu, K.; Luo, L.; Wang, Y.; Du, X.; He, Q.; Ye, F. Design, Synthesis and Ability of Non-Gold Complexed Substituted Purine Derivatives to Inhibit LPS-Induced Inflammatory Response. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 149, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oyarzabal, J.; Zarich, N.; Albarran, M.I.; Palacios, I.; Urbano-Cuadrado, M.; Mateos, G.; Reymundo, I.; Rabal, O.; Salgado, A.; Corrionero, A.; et al. Discovery of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Interacting Kinase 1 Inhibitors by a Comprehensive Fragment-Oriented Virtual Screening Approach. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6618–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nepali, K.; Chang, T.Y.; Lai, M.J.; Hsu, K.C.; Yen, Y.; Lin, T.E.; Lee, S.B.; Liou, J.P. Purine/Purine Isoster Based Scaffolds as New Derivatives of Benzamide Class of HDAC Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 196, 112291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, J.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gong, P. Discovery of Selective EGFR Modulator to Inhibit L858R/T790M Double Mutants Bearing a N-9-Diphenyl-9H-Purin-2-Amine Scaffold. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 1810–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Laufer, S.A.; Domeyer, D.M.; Scior, T.R.F.; Albrecht, W.; Hauser, D.R.J. Synthesis and Biological Testing of Purine Derivatives as Potential ATP-Competitive Kinase Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 710–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anscombe, E.; Meschini, E.; Mora-Vidal, R.; Martin, M.P.; Staunton, D.; Geitmann, M.; Danielson, U.H.; Stanley, W.A.; Wang, L.Z.; Reuillon, T.; et al. Identification and Characterization of an Irreversible Inhibitor of CDK2. Chem. Biol. 2015, 22, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bhat, M.; Robichaud, N.; Hulea, L.; Sonenberg, N.; Pelletier, J.; Topisirovic, I. Targeting the Translation Machinery in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lineham, E.; Spencer, J.; Morley, S.J. Dual Abrogation of MNK and MTOR: A Novel Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Aggressive Cancers. Future Med. Chem. 2017, 9, 1539–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Ding, Z.; Zhou, M.; Zeng, C. Recent Advances in Isatin Hybrids as Potential Anticancer Agents. Arch. Pharm. 2020, 353, 1900367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wang, J.; Lenardo, M.J. Roles of Caspases in Apoptosis, Development, and Cytokine Maturation Revealed by Homozygous Gene Deficiencies. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Riccardi, C.; Nicoletti, I. Analysis of Apoptosis by Propidium Iodide Staining and Flow Cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 1458–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mohameda, M.S.; Kamel, M.M.; Kassem, E.M.; Abotaleb, N.; AbdEl-Moez, S.I.; Ahmed, M.F. Novel 6,8-Dibromo-4(3H)Quinazolinone Derivatives of Anti-Bacterial and Anti-Fungal Activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3311–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Musumeci, F.; Fallacara, A.L.; Brullo, C.; Grossi, G.; Botta, L.; Calandro, P.; Chiariello, M.; Kissova, M.; Crespan, E.; Maga, G.; et al. Identification of New Pyrrolo[2,3-d]Pyrimidines as Src Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Vitro Active against Glioblastoma. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 127, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. van Meerloo, J.; Kaspers, G.J.L.; Cloos, J. Cell Sensitivity Assays: The MTT Assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 731, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Asghar, U.; Witkiewicz, A.K.; Turner, N.C.; Knudsen, E.S. The History and Future of Targeting Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Cancer Therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  37. Tai, W.; Mahato, R.; Cheng, K. The Role of HER2 in Cancer Therapy and Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Control. Release 2010, 146, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Nakamura, J.L. The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Malignant Gliomas: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications. Expert Opin. Ther. Targ. 2007, 11, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sharma, K.; Suresh, P.S.; Mullangi, R.; Srinivas, N.R. Quantitation of VEGFR2 (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor) Inhibitors--Review of Assay Methodologies and Perspectives. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2015, 29, 803–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 59 00610 g001 550
Figure 1. Compounds containing isatin scaffold or purine.
Figure 1. Compounds containing isatin scaffold or purine.
Medicina 59 00610 g001
Medicina 59 00610 g002 550
Figure 2. Rational design of isatin–purine hybrid compounds.
Figure 2. Rational design of isatin–purine hybrid compounds.
Medicina 59 00610 g002
Medicina 59 00610 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of isatin–purine hybrid compounds 4–16. i. Ethyl 4-aminobenzoate, trimethylamine, BuOH, reflux, 7 h. ii. N2H2.H2O, abs. EtOH, reflux, 6 h. iii. Appropriate isatin, AcOH, EtOH, reflux, 8–12 h. iv. Excess of hydrazine hydrate, reflux, 1 h. v. Appropriate isatin, AcOH, EtOH, reflux, 3–7 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of isatin–purine hybrid compounds 4–16. i. Ethyl 4-aminobenzoate, trimethylamine, BuOH, reflux, 7 h. ii. N2H2.H2O, abs. EtOH, reflux, 6 h. iii. Appropriate isatin, AcOH, EtOH, reflux, 8–12 h. iv. Excess of hydrazine hydrate, reflux, 1 h. v. Appropriate isatin, AcOH, EtOH, reflux, 3–7 h.
Medicina 59 00610 sch001
Medicina 59 00610 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic 2D and 3D representation of docking analysis of erlotinib (A) and compound 15 (B) in the active site of EGFR (PDB ID: 4HJO).
Figure 3. Schematic 2D and 3D representation of docking analysis of erlotinib (A) and compound 15 (B) in the active site of EGFR (PDB ID: 4HJO).
Medicina 59 00610 g003
Medicina 59 00610 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic 2D and 3D representation of docking analysis of sorafenib (A) and compound 15 (B) in the active site of VEGFR2 (PDB ID: 4ASD).
Figure 4. Schematic 2D and 3D representation of docking analysis of sorafenib (A) and compound 15 (B) in the active site of VEGFR2 (PDB ID: 4ASD).
Medicina 59 00610 g004
Medicina 59 00610 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic 2D and 3D representation of docking analysis of lapatinib (A) and compound 15 (B) in the active site of Her2 (PDB ID: 3RCD).
Figure 5. Schematic 2D and 3D representation of docking analysis of lapatinib (A) and compound 15 (B) in the active site of Her2 (PDB ID: 3RCD).
Medicina 59 00610 g005
Medicina 59 00610 g006 550
Figure 6. Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle phases following treatment with compound 15.
Figure 6. Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle phases following treatment with compound 15.
Medicina 59 00610 g006
Medicina 59 00610 g007 550
Figure 7. Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis in HepG2 cells following treatment with compound 15.
Figure 7. Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis in HepG2 cells following treatment with compound 15.
Medicina 59 00610 g007
Table
Table 1. Cytotoxicity effect of isatin–purine hybrid compounds 4–16 on HepG2, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity effect of isatin–purine hybrid compounds 4–16 on HepG2, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa.
Medicina 59 00610 i001
CompoundRIn Vitro Cytotoxicity IC50 (µM)
HepG2MCF-7MDA-MB-231HeLa
4-54.62 ± 3.147.26 ± 3.059.67 ± 2.962.38 ± 3.4
5Cl88.14 ± 4.0>10082.13 ± 3.8>100
6F42.35 ± 2.722.31 ± 1.819.05 ± 1.430.69 ± 2.3
7CH360.38 ± 3.276.38 ± 3.791.60 ± 4.5>100
8OCH348.12 ± 2.940.57 ± 2.729.78 ± 2.053.49 ± 3.2
9NO275.56 ± 3.565.01 ± 3.472.24 ± 3.484.57 ± 4.1
11-12.89 ± 1.015.60 ± 1.324.83 ± 1.917.63 ± 1.4
12Cl26.45 ± 1.833.04 ± 2.341.29 ± 2.546.72 ± 2.8
13F31.70 ± 2.138.82 ± 2.545.21 ± 2.751.20 ± 3.0
14CH318.06 ± 1.327.53 ± 2.132.55 ± 2.243.51 ± 2.7
15OCH39.61 ± 0.810.78 ± 0.914.89 ± 1.28.93 ± 0.8
16NO239.73 ± 2.558.32 ± 3.267.42 ± 3.269.50 ± 3.6
Sunitinib-6.82 ± 0.55.19 ± 0.48.41 ± 0.77.48 ± 0.6
All IC50 values are presented as the mean ± SD of three different experiments.
Table
Table 2. Kinase inhibitory effects of compound 15 on EGFR, Her2, VEGFR2 and CDK2.
Table 2. Kinase inhibitory effects of compound 15 on EGFR, Her2, VEGFR2 and CDK2.
CompoundKinase ProteinIC50 (μM)
15CDK20.534
Roscovitine0.143
15EGFR0.143
Erlotinib0.041
15Her20.15
Lapatinib0.051
15VEGFR20.192
Sorafenib0.049
All IC50 values are presented as the mean ± SD of three different experiments.
Table
Table 3. Effect of compound 15 on cell cycle progression in HepG2 cells.
Table 3. Effect of compound 15 on cell cycle progression in HepG2 cells.
Compound/Cell LineCell Cycle Distribution (%)
% G0–G1% S% G2/M% Pre-G1
Compound 15/HepG251.1842.446.3821.47
Cont. HepG244.3938.1617.452.02
All percentages are presented as the mean of three different experiments.
Table
Table 4. Effect of compound 15 on the distribution of apoptotic cells in HepG2 cells.
Table 4. Effect of compound 15 on the distribution of apoptotic cells in HepG2 cells.
SampleApoptosis
ViableEarlyLateNecrosis
Compound 15/HepG278.53%1.86%12.58%7.03%
Cont. HepG297.98%0.38%0.19%1.45%
All percentages are presented as the mean of three different experiments.
Table
Table 5. Effect of compound 15 on protein expression of Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9.
Table 5. Effect of compound 15 on protein expression of Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9.
Compound/Cell LineProteinExpression (Pg/mL)Fold
15/HepG2BAX279.1 ± 8.153.38
Control HepG283.88 ± 231
15/HepG2Bcl-24.593 ± 0.220.43
Control HepG210.67 ± 0.831
15/HepG2Caspase 3368.4 ± 20.73.95
Control HepG293.23 ± 15.51
15/HepG2Caspase 914.07 ± 0.583.11
Control HepG24.52 ± 1.271
All percentages are presented as the mean ± SD of three different experiments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alanazi, A.S.; Mirgany, T.O.; Alsfouk, A.A.; Alsaif, N.A.; Alanazi, M.M. Antiproliferative Activity, Multikinase Inhibition, Apoptosis- Inducing Effects and Molecular Docking of Novel Isatin–Purine Hybrids. Medicina 2023, 59, 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030610

AMA Style

Alanazi AS, Mirgany TO, Alsfouk AA, Alsaif NA, Alanazi MM. Antiproliferative Activity, Multikinase Inhibition, Apoptosis- Inducing Effects and Molecular Docking of Novel Isatin–Purine Hybrids. Medicina. 2023; 59(3):610. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alanazi, Ashwag S., Tebyan O. Mirgany, Aisha A. Alsfouk, Nawaf A. Alsaif, and Mohammed M. Alanazi. 2023. "Antiproliferative Activity, Multikinase Inhibition, Apoptosis- Inducing Effects and Molecular Docking of Novel Isatin–Purine Hybrids" Medicina 59, no. 3: 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030610

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop