Next Article in Journal
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (ddcf-DNA) and Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis in Kidney Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Increased Fib-4 Score in Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus on COVID-19 Disease Prognosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
New-Onset Diabetes after Kidney Transplantation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 57
Issue 5
10.3390/medicina57050435
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Disease: An Update and Systematic Review of the Literature

by
Roberta Angelico
1,†,
Francesca Blasi
1,†,
Tommaso Maria Manzia
1,*,
Luca Toti
1,
Giuseppe Tisone
1 and
Roberto Cacciola
1,2
1
Department of Surgery Sciences, Transplant and HPB Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Surgery, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Medicina 2021, 57(5), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050435
Submission received: 21 March 2021 / Revised: 22 April 2021 / Accepted: 28 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kidney Transplantation—Clinical and Surgical Challenges)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the management of immunosuppressive (IS) therapy in kidney transplant (KT) recipients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) requires attention. It is not yet understood whether IS therapy may protect from the cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection or a temporary adjustment/withdrawal of IS therapy to restore the immune system may be necessary. We performed a systematic literature review to investigate the current management of IS therapy in KT recipients with COVID-1. Materials and Methods: Out of 71 articles published from 1 February 2020 until 30 October 2020, 554 KT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. Results: Modifications of IS therapy were based on the clinical conditions. For asymptomatic patients or those with mild COVID-19 symptoms, a “wait and see approach” was mostly used; a suspension of antimetabolites drugs (347/461, 75.27%) or mTOR inhibitors (38/48, 79.2%) was adopted in the majority of patients with symptomatic COVID-19 infections. For CNIs, the most frequent attitude was their maintenance (243/502, 48.4%) or dose-reduction (99/502, 19.72%) in patients asymptomatic or with mild COVID-19 symptoms, while drug withdrawal was the preferred choice in severely symptomatic patients (160/450, 31.87%). A discontinuation of all IS drugs was used only in severely symptomatic COVID-19 patients on invasive mechanical ventilation. Renal function remained stable in 422(76.17%) recipients, while 49(8.84%) patients experienced graft loss. Eight (1.44%) patients experienced a worsening of renal function. The overall mortality was 21.84%, and 53(9.56%) patients died with functioning grafts. Conclusion: A tailored approach to the patient has been the preferred strategy for the management of IS therapy in KT recipients, taking into account the clinical conditions of patients and the potential interactions between IS and antiviral drugs, in the attempt to balance the risks of COVID-19-related complications and those due to rejection or graft loss.

1. Introduction

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. During the past decades, patient and graft survival after KT has considerably improved [1,2], mainly due to the availability of new immunosuppressive (IS) drugs. However, if on one hand, IS agents are necessary to prevent rejection, on the other hand, they increase the risk of infections. These infections, indeed, remain the most common non-cardiovascular causes of death after KT [3,4].
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in humans during December 2019 as the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The manifestations of COVID-19 are different from patient to patient, ranging from asymptomatic/mild symptoms to severe illness leading to death; the main symptoms are fever, weakness, respiratory distress, muscle pain, and loss of taste or smell [5]. Strong international recommendations have been generated to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which include the use of personal protective devices, avoiding exposure in high-risk places, frequent hand washing, wearing of masks, and social distancing measures [6]. Despite this, the risk of developing COVID-19 in transplant patients is higher than in the general population. Recently, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has classified KT recipients as a high-risk group for severe COVID-19 [7], due to both the immunocompromised status and impaired kidney function.
A few articles have focused so far on the management of IS therapy in KT recipients with COVID-19 [8]. Generally, a reduction in IS drugs is a widely used strategy for the management of other viral infections, which may occur in both kidney and liver transplant recipients. The 2009 KDIGO guidelines for the management of IS therapy after KT recommend to use a combination of IS drugs, including CNI and ADs (with a level 1 recommendation) as standard therapy, and suggest their adjustment in case of viral infection [9]. Despite these recommendations mention the therapeutic strategies to be adopted in case of viral infections from BK virus or cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, Herpes virus, hepatitis viruses, or human immunodeficiency virus, yet there are currently no evidence-based guidelines for managing IS regimens in patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2; there are only expert opinions [8,9]. The present study aims to review the management of IS drugs in KT recipients infected by SARS-CoV-2 in order to provide practical tools for the administration of IS therapy in KT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, taken from the best of the available literature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

A systematic research was performed to identify relevant studies focused on the management of IS drugs in adult KT recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The search strategy complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [10].
A systematic search within the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases was carried out to identify relevant English-language articles published from 1 February 2020 to 30 October 2020. Search terms included coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, renal transplantation, and kidney transplantation.

2.2. Screening Process

The present systematic review included an a priori search criteria of journal articles amongst adult (≥18 years old) KT recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2. In the search, we included all original articles, case reports, case series, case-control studies, and correspondence articles dealing with KT recipients infected by SARS-CoV-2 that detailed the management of IS drugs. Studies lacking the details of IS therapy were excluded. All studies that originated from the same center were considered and analyzed, and possible overlap of clinical cases reported across the studies were evaluated.

2.3. Study Selection and Data Extraction

A total of 821 articles were identified. Two reviewers (R.A. and F.B.) independently screened the identified studies and their data were extracted. In case of disagreement, the paper was discussed by all the authors. After the systematic screening, 71 articles were identified for the systematic review analysis (Figure 1), including 48 case reports, 21 case series, 1 case-control study, and 1 prospective study as summarized in Table 1 (reporting case reports with a maximum of two patients) and Table 2 (describing articles with more than two patients). Given the paucity of patients identified within the selection criteria in each selected article, the results are reported as a narrative review. Data extracted from each study [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81] included year of publication, number of participants, and the data-relevant outcome variables explained above.

2.4. Study Quality Assessment

Included manuscripts were evaluated for methodological quality using the modification of the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the tool provided by Murad and colleagues, as appropriate [82]. Only questions relevant to the review purpose were considered. We opted for an overall judgement and the quality of the selected studies was classified as low, average, or high (Supplementary Table S1).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Due to the nature and quality of the studies available, no meta-analysis could be performed. In order to offer a compact description of the literature, categorical variables were reported as numbers, whereas continuous variables were reported as ranges. Therefore, the summary provided must be considered as a narrative description, and no inferences should be drawn.

3. Results

Our analysis identified 554 KT recipients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, for whom the management of IS therapy was reported (Table 1 and Table 2). The median age of KT recipients at time of detection of SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 46 (range: 31–75) years, and the median time from transplantation was 6.1 (range: 0–25) years.
At the time of detection of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, the maintenance IS therapy was mostly based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (n = 502, 90.61%), including tacrolimus (Tac) (n = 453, 81.76%), cyclosporine A (CyA) (n = 28, 5.05%), or non-specified CNI (n = 21, 3.79%)], followed by antimetabolites drugs (ADs) (n = 461, 83.2%) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (n = 48, 8.66%). At the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection, 399 (72.02%) patients were receiving steroids.
The overall management of IS therapy in KT recipients affected by COVID-19 is shown in Table 3. The most frequent approach consisted of the discontinuation of ADs (347/461, 75.27%), while ADs were maintained stable in 70/461 (15.18%) patients or reduced in 44/461 (9.54%) cases. Administration of CNIs was unchanged in 243/502 (48.4%) KT recipients, while it was reduced in 99/502 (19.72%) KT recipients and discontinued in 160/502 (31.87%) KT recipients. Among 453 KT recipients receiving Tac, in 229 (50.6%) KT recipients Tac was not modified, in 138 (30.5%) patients, it was suspended, and in 86 (19.0%), it was reduced. Thus, CyA was suspended in more than half of the patients (17/28, 60.7%) and not modified in the remanent patients (11/28, 39.3%). Regarding mTOR inhibitors, which were less frequently used, these were discontinued in 79.2% (38/48) of infected patients.
Four (0.8%) KT recipients developed a SARS-CoV-2 infection within 6 months from KT [30,44]. In all of them, the induction therapy had consisted of thymoglobulin, and all patients were receiving steroids at the time of the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of these, two patients were managed with the withdrawal of ADs and two cases were managed with the reduction in ADs. Tac was reduced in all of them, except for one patient in whom it was completely discontinued. All patients were alive, and none developed deterioration of renal function that required hemodialysis.
For a large majority of asymptomatic KT recipients or those with mild symptoms, no modifications of the IS regimen were made. In contrast, in KT recipients with symptomatic COVID-19, suspension of ADs or mTOR inhibitors was adopted in up to 79% of patients, especially in those patients requiring invasive ventilation, while CNI withdrawal (31.87%) was reserved in those who were severely symptomatic. A complete discontinuation of all IS drugs was adopted only in KT recipients with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
All SARS-CoV-2-infected KT recipients underwent strict monitoring of their clinical conditions and renal function. Kidney graft function remained stable in 422 (76.17%) patients, 49 (8.84%) patients experienced graft loss and 8 (1.44%) patients developed worsening renal function caused by acute kidney injury. In 67 (12.09%) KT recipients, the graft outcome was not reported.
Overall, 121 (21.84%) KT recipients with COVID-19 died. Of these, 53 (43.8%) patients died with a functioning graft, 41 (33.8%) patients died with a non-functioning graft, and two (1.65%) patients died with impaired renal function not requiring dialysis, while in 21 (17.35%) cases, the graft status at the time of death was not detailed.
Considering all the cases described in the literature, it was found that 49 (8.84%) KT recipients with COVID-19 required replacement renal treatment and 45 (91.83%) of these patients died.

4. Discussion

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, as of 21 April 2021, there have been 142 million cases and 3.032 million deaths have been reported. So far, studies investigating the impact of the pandemic on the use of IS therapy in KT recipients and their related outcomes are limited. Elias et al. [67] reported the French experience, which represents the largest cohort of KT recipients affected by COVID-19 (n = 66) so far described. In this prospective study, 29 (43.9%) patients underwent a reduction in their IS regimen, which was more frequently done in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (87%) than in those not requiring respiratory support (57%). As in other series, the primary modification of IS therapy consisted of withdrawal of ADs (62%) while continuing CNIs and the baseline steroids (for those individuals who were on maintenance prednisolone). In the subgroup of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (n = 15), ADs were suspended in all patients. Thus, CNIs were discontinued in only 14% of them. This IS management adopted in the French experience reflects the common approach found in the majority of the articles analyzed. The overall mortality rate of the French report was 24% (16/66), which is in line with the results of the present study. However, the mortality was definitely higher in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (11/15, 73%) compared to that observed in patients without invasive respiratory support (5/51, 10%).
Another large experience was described by Pierotti et al. [77], who reported a retrospective study of 51 KT recipients with COVID-19 in Sao Paulo, Brazil. In the majority of patients (32/51, 62.7%), ADs and mTOR inhibitors were withdrawn, while CNIs and steroids were maintained at reduced doses; thus, in 19/51 (37.2%) patients, mainly admitted to the ICU (17/19, 89.5%), ADs and CNIs were completely suspended, while steroids (hydrocortisone) were maintained.
Based on the current data, the risk of developing COVID-19 in transplant patients is reported to be about 5%, being higher than in the general population (0.3%) [67,83]. Some studies have suggested that the risk factors associated with COVID-19 disease in KT recipients are non-white ethnicity, obesity, asthma, chronic pulmonary disease, and diabetes, as in the general population, and in addition, the immunocompromised status and pre-existent kidney disease [67,84]. From the current available data, the severity of the systemic disease due to COVID-19 negatively affects patient survival, and in patients with very severe disease, it is even greater in both transplanted and non-transplanted patients. The mortality rate among KT recipients with COVID-19 has been reported to be between 23% and 28%, which is certainly higher than the figure of <5% mostly found in the non-transplant population of COVID-19 infected patients [53]. Accordingly, recent data from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry confirmed the vulnerability of KT recipients infected with COVID-19, who showed a mortality rate of 20–25% in the European countries more severely affected by the pandemic [85].
Compared to non-COVID-19 pneumonia, the figures of KT with COVID-19 are still different. In a retrospective study focusing on severe pneumonia (due to bacterial, viral, or fungal infection) requiring intensive care unit admission in 60 KT recipients, the mortality rate was 18.8% in patients with pneumonia early after transplantation and 7.1% in these with late onset of pneumonia [86]. In this study, graft function was maintained stable in the majority of patients (76.7%), while 6.7% required renal replacement therapy during the intensive care unit stay and 3.3% of these experienced graft losses [86]. These data suggest that the outcomes of non-COVID-19 pneumonia after KT seem to be slightly superior compared to the outcomes of patients affected by COVID-19.
As extensively described by Gagliardi et al. [87], the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself has been associated to the development of acute kidney injury especially in patients with a pre-existing chronic kidney damage. The two main pathophysiological mechanisms of kidney damage in COVID-19 patients are direct cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 on renal epithelial cells and an indirect cytokine storm syndrome. Moreover, hypoxia, persistent hypotension, rhabdomyolysis, over activation of the coagulation cascade, and impairment of microcirculation play a role in the predisposition to the development of acute renal damage. Based on this, it is reasonable that these mechanisms may occur also in kidney grafts, worsening the renal function during the COVID-19 disease.
Since the immunocompromised status of KT recipients may conceivably influence the outcome of COVID-19 disease in KT recipients, the management of the IS regimen is thought to play a central role in such frail patients. Some data suggest that IS may exert “a protective role”, as the cytokine storm is considered to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of the disease. Yet, on the other hand, it is also reasonable to advise a reduction, or a temporary withdrawal, of IS drugs during a severe course of COVID-19 in order to obtain earlier restoration of the host immune system [88,89].
The concomitance of increased COVID-19-related morbidity with the risks of acute rejection and graft loss makes the management of IS therapy in KT recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 a very difficult task, which does not currently rely on solid evidence. In this review, we therefore aimed to assess how transplant physicians are currently handling the use of IS drugs in KT recipients with COVID-19 to the best of the available literature. We found that maintenance IS therapy, at the time of detection of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, was mainly based on CNIs, ADs, and mTOR inhibitors, with or without steroids. Most importantly, all the authors of the articles that we identified advised to consider an individual modification of IS therapy based on the clinical condition of each patient.
For KT recipients with mild symptoms, the “wait and see approach” was the most commonly used [44,90]. This conservative clinical practice is in line with the recommendation of the Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States (DESCARTES) Working Group, an expert panel of the ERA-EDTA [8]. This is also similar to the recommendations of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) for SAR-COV-2-infected KT recipients, supporting the view that there is no need to discontinue, nor to decrease, the dose of immunosuppressant in non-critically ill patients [91].
In contrast, in KT recipients with symptomatic COVID-19, the most frequently used approach was the suspension of the ADs or mTOR inhibitors, regardless the fact that both these IS drugs showed in vitro antiviral effects against some type of coronavirus. In addition, there is evidence that they inhibit T cell function and proliferation [92] and interfere in the regulation of the proteins involved in the cell cycle, angiogenesis, and glycolysis [93].
The ADs include mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolic acid (MPA), and azathioprine (AZA). MMF, a derivative of mycophenolic acid, is a selective inhibitor of purine synthesis, determining a potent inhibition of T and B cell proliferation. MPA showed, in in vitro studies, an antiviral effect on four subtypes of coronaviruses, but not for COVID-19 [94]. However, MMF has well-known adverse hematologic effects, including leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, which may exacerbate hematologic complications of COVID-19 [95]. AZA is an imidazole derivative antimetabolite of 6-mercaptopurine. It inhibits DNA synthesis, thus blocking the proliferation and differentiation of T and B lymphocytes and the production of antibodies and decreasing the level of circulating monocytes and granulocytes. Therefore, these actions of the ADs might compromise the immune response against COVID-19.
Differently, the mTOR inhibitors, namely, everolimus and sirolimus, bind to the intracellular protein FKBP-12, forming a complex that inhibits the activity of mTOR complex-1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2. This inhibition interferes with translation and protein synthesis by reducing the activity of ribosomal protein kinase S6 (S6K1) and eukaryotic translation elongation factor 4E binding protein (4EBP-1), which regulate the proteins involved in the cell cycle, angiogenesis, and glycolysis. In vitro mTOR inhibitors have been shown to reduce the replication of another coronavirus, the Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [96]. However, at the same time, mTOR inhibitors can induce leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and pneumonitis, therefore possibly further worsening the hematological effects of COVID-19.
For the two CNIs, CyA and Tac, the most frequent approach was maintenance of the therapy or reduction in their dosage in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients. Only in KT recipients with severe COVID-19 symptoms and in patients requiring invasive respiratory support, CNIs were completely suspended. However, there is a lack of data in the literature regarding the safe trough levels of CNIs to be adopted in KT recipients with COVID-19.
Despite CyA and Tac having different molecular structures and intracellular characteristics, they share the same IS properties consisting of the inhibition of calcium- and calmodulin-dependent phosphatase proteins or calcineurin. CyA binds to cyclophilin, while Tac binds to FKBP12 [97,98]. Their interaction with calcineurin inhibits the phosphatase activity of calcineurin, and in this way, they suppress transcription of IL-2 by impairing the translocation of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), which leads to a non-response of T lymphocytes to specific antigenic stimuli [99]. Some studies showed that both CyA and Tac might exert antiviral activity, as evidenced in vitro on different coronavirus strains [92,100]. Interestingly, in a recent Italian study [93], patients treated with CNIs affected by SARS-CoV-2 showed a low severity of COVID-19 infection. The authors speculated that this apparently more favorable clinical course might be related to the long-term exposure of patients to the IS regimens, which might have prevented the occurrence of massive alveolar macrophage activation with lower release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which play a key role in the context of COVID-19 infection [101]. Taken together, these data suggest that CNIs may indeed exert a certain degree of antiviral activity against SAR-CoV-2, an interesting hypothesis that obviously needs confirmation. Despite both Tac and mTOR inhibitors binding FKBP12, there are no sufficient data to explain why the majority of the authors preferred to suspend the mTOR inhibitors more frequently than Tac; one explanation could be related to the fact that Tac is the most frequently used IS drug in KT recipients, its management is better known, and it is also the most active in preventing allograft rejection. Moreover, m-TOR inhibitors can induce leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, which can cause a worsening of the COVID-19 hematological effects.
On the other hand, possible interactions between CNIs or mTOR inhibitors and antiviral drugs commonly used against COVID-19, such as lopinavir or ritonavir, have been well demonstrated; hence, a strict monitoring of these IS drugs is mandatory [102]. The doses of CNIs and mTOR inhibitors should be reduced or the two drugs should be withdrawn according to the duration of the antiviral treatment, as also suggested by the DESCARTES Working Group [8].
Lastly, also the use of corticosteroids for the management of COVID-19 is controversial. The Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trials showed benefits of high doses of dexamethasone in patients under mechanical ventilation [103]; meanwhile, a recent systematic review showed a longer period of hospitalization for patients who received glucocorticoids, without benefits in terms of mortality [103]. It is well-known that corticosteroids are involved in a number of key physiological processes, including the immune response and inflammation, modulating a variety of cytokines; accordingly, their use appeared to be favorable in several viral infections [104,105]. In patients affected by SARS caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, steroids (usually methylprednisolone) are currently administered; however, some studies have identified that steroid therapy may even prolong the viral shedding [106]. In our analysis, the majority of KT recipients, under maintenance steroid therapy, were maintained on their habitual steroid dose during the COVID-19 infection.
Despite a few data being identified on induction agents in KT recipients with COVID-19 infection [107], the induction therapy is a very relevant aspect in KT, as it is widely used to provide fast and effective protection against acute allograft rejection [108]. Yet, at the same time, induction therapy may increase the risk of infectious diseases [109,110]. The commonly used induction agents, such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and rituximab, produce powerful lymphocyte depletion, which is highly effective in preventing acute rejection [111]; however, the effects of these agents extend well beyond the first month after KT [112]. Consequently, the use of lymphocyte-depleting induction IS therapy may expose KT recipients to an increased vulnerability to COVID-19 infection. In the context of the current pandemic, non-lymphocyte-depleting agents, such as basiliximab, may be considered a more prudent choice, although its advantages have been questioned [113].
For new KT recipients, considering the overall IS dose (induction plus maintenance therapy) administered at the time of KT, with the available evidence of nosocomial and opportunistic infections after KT [114,115], we may counterintuitively consider that the newly immunosuppressed patients are more vulnerable to COVID-19 as compared to those on long-term maintenance regimes, but, further data are needed to confirm this assumption. In this sub-category, restricting the use of lymphocyte-depleting agents to specific circumstances and favoring the use of basiliximab may constitute a measured initial approach. Today, more than ever, in the context of a pandemic scenario, we may argue whether the use of an induction therapy in patients with a low immunological risk is really necessary [116], given that the use of a common triple IS regimen, such as the combination of Tac, MMF, and steroids, significantly reduces the risk of rejection [117,118]. On the other hand, the use of induction therapy could reduce the chronic exposure to CNIs and steroids; therefore, it is questionable if it is better to use induction therapy and low-dose maintenance therapy or not administer induction therapy followed by initial high-dose maintenance therapy [119].
Based on the current literature review and our experience, we suggest that the modification of IS regimens in KT recipients affected by COVID-19 infection needs to be evaluated case by case, according to the clinical status of the patient with strict monitoring. We believe that IS therapy should be cautiously modified only in symptomatic patients, since the current data show no benefits of a radical modification of IS therapy in patients with mild symptoms. In patients with moderate symptoms who require modification of IS therapy, we suggest to start with a reduction or discontinuation of the ADs. Differently, patients with severe symptoms, especially those with invasive respiratory support, require complete withdrawal of IS drugs, and the maintenance of steroids seems to be the best choice.
However, this debate clearly requires future exploration within a large study enrolling newly performed KT during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In fact, the current analysis is limited by the paucity of the current experience; moreover, the available data are not homogeneous and largely incomplete. Therefore, their interpretation should be cautious.

5. Conclusions

The current knowledge of the management of IS therapy in KT recipients with SARS-CoV-2 positivity is based on small series or case reports. A tailored approach to individual patients is the currently preferred choice, by evaluating the clinical status of the patients and balancing the risk of COVID-19-related complications and the risk of rejection or graft loss. We found that the most frequently used approach for the management of IS therapy is, nowadays, the discontinuation of ADs (MMF, MPA, or azathioprine) and mTOR inhibitors in all patients. In contrast, CNIs are maintained stable, or dose-reduced, in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients, while complete withdrawal of CNIs is considered in symptomatic patients. A total discontinuation of all IS drugs is commonly used only in patients with severe symptomatic COVID-19 infection requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. The careful use of corticosteroids should be adopted. Antiviral drugs commonly used for the treatment of COVID-19 may have several drug–drug interactions, causing increased serum levels of CNIs and mTOR inhibitors. These may result in adverse reactions, which may require the suspension of IS therapy. Therefore, currently available data suggest that, in KT recipients with COVID-19, any modification of IS therapy should be individualized and careful monitoring of IS drugs serum levels is advisable. However, because of the paucity of today’s experiences, further data are needed before conclusive clinical recommendations for the administration of IS therapy in new KT recipients affected by COVID-19 can be done.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medicina57050435/s1, Table S1. Quality of evidence in the selected papers for the systematic review according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A. and R.C.; methodology, R.A. and F.B.; formal analysis, R.A., F.B. and L.T.; investigation, F.B. and L.T.; resources, F.B. and L.T; data curation, R.A., T.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A. and F.B.; writing—review and editing, T.M.M., R.C., and G.T.; visualization, R.A. and T.M.M.; supervision, R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wolfe, R.A.; Roys, E.C.; Merion, R.M. Trends in Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008. Am. J. Transplant. 2010, 10 Pt 2, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Favi, E.; Salerno, M.; Romagnoli, J.; Castagneto, M.; Citterio, F. Significant Improvement in Patient Survival After Renal Transplantation in the Last Decade. Transplant. Proc. 2011, 43, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Howard, R.J.; Patton, P.R.; Reed, A.I.; Hemming, A.W.; Van Der Werf, W.J.; Pfaff, W.W.; Srinivas, T.R.; Scornik, J.C. The changing causes of graft loss and death after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2002, 73, 1923–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pruthi, R.; Steenkamp, R.; Feest, T. UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Chapter 8 Survival and Cause of Death of UK Adult Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy in 2012: National and Centre-specific Analyses. Nephron Clin. Pr. 2013, 125, 139–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lovato, A.; De Filippis, C.; Marioni, G. Upper airway symptoms in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2020, 41, 102474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Monaco, A.; Manzia, T.M.; Angelico, R.; Iaria, G.; Gazia, C.; Al Alawi, Y.; Fourtounas, K.; Tisone, G.; Cacciola, R. Awareness and Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplant. Proc. 2020, 52, 2607–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Centers for Disease Control nd Prevention. People with Underying Medical Conditions, Immunocompromides State (Weakened Immune System) from Solid Organ Transplant. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.htmn#immunocom-promised-state (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  8. Maggiore, U.; Abramowicz, D.; Crespo, M.; Mariat, C.; Mjoen, G.; Peruzzi, L.; Sever, M.S.; Oniscu, G.C.; Hilbrands, L.; Watschinger, B. How should I manage immunosuppression in a kidney transplant patient with COVID-19? An ERA-EDTA DESCARTES expert opinion. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2020, 35, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kasiske, B.L.; Zeier, M.G.; Chapman, J.R.; Craig, J.C.; Ekberg, H.; Garvey, C.A.; Green, M.D.; Jha, V.; Josephson, M.A.; Kiberd, B.A.; et al. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: A summary. Kidney Int. 2010, 77, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Akdur, A.; Karakaya, E.; Soy, E.H.A.; Alshalabi, O.; Kırnap, M.; Arslan, H.; Ulubay, G.; Hekimoglu, K.; Moray, G.; Haberal, M. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Kidney and Liver Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2020, 18, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Allam, S.R.; Dao, A.; Madhrira, M.M.; Antiporta, P.B.; Nair, R.R.; Guiteau, J.J.; Reyad, A.I. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonist therapy to treat SARS-CoV-2 driven inflammatory syndrome in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bartiromo, M.; Borchi, B.; Botta, A.; Bagalà, A.; Lugli, G.; Tilli, M.; Cavallo, A.; Xhaferi, B.; Cutruzzulà, R.; Vaglio, A.; et al. Threatening drug-drug interaction in a kidney transplant patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Billah, M.; Santeusanio, A.; Delaney, V.; Cravedi, P.; Farouk, S.S. A catabolic state in a kidney transplant recipient with COVID-19. Transpl. Int. 2020, 33, 1140–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bussalino, E.; De Maria, A.; Russo, R.; Paoletti, E. Immunosuppressive therapy maintenance in a kidney transplant recipient with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A case report. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1922–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, S.; Yin, Q.; Shi, H.; Du, D.; Chang, S.; Ni, L.; Qiu, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W. A familial cluster, including a kidney transplant recipient, of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1869–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cheng, D.; Wen, J.; Liu, Z.; Lv, T.; Chen, J. Coronavirus disease 2019 in renal transplant recipients: Report of two cases. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chenna, A.; Konala, V.M.; Gayam, V.; Naramala, S.; Adapa, S. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Renal Transplant Patient. Cureus 2020, 12, e8038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mathiasen, V.D.; Jensen-Fangel, S.; Skov, K.; Leth, S. Uneventful case of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e237427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dirim, A.B.; Demir, E.; Ucar, A.R.; Garayeva, N.; Safak, S.; Oto, O.A.; Yazici, H.; Alibeyoglu, A.M.; Orhun, G.; Cagatay, A.A.; et al. Fatal SARS-CoV-2 infection in a renal transplant recipient. CEN Case Rep. 2020, 9, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fontana, F.; Alfano, G.; Mori, G.; Amurri, A.; Tei, L.; Ballestri, M.; Leonelli, M.; Facchini, F.; Damiano, F.; Magistroni, R.; et al. COVID-19 pneumonia in a kidney transplant recipient successfully treated with tocilizumab and hydroxychloroquine. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1902–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gandolfini, I.; Delsante, M.; Fiaccadori, E.; Zaza, G.; Manenti, L.; Degli Antoni, A.; Peruzzi, L.; Riella, L.V.; Cravedi, P.; Maggiore, U. COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1941–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guillen, E.; Pineiro, G.J.; Revuelta, I.; Rodriguez, D.; Bodro, M.; Moreno, A.; Campistol, J.M.; Diekmann, F.; Ventura-Aguiar, P. Case report of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient: Does immunosuppression alter the clinical presentation? Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1875–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ahmad, S.H.; Smith, R.; Camilleri, B. Belatacept, kidney transplantation and COVID-19: Successful management of the first reported case within the United Kingdom. Clin. Transplant. 2020, 34, e14026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hsu, J.J.; Gaynor, P.; Kamath, M.; Fan, A.; Al-Saffar, F.; Cruz, D.; Nsair, A. COVID-19 in a high-risk dual heart and kidney transplant recipient. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1911–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, J.; Lin, H.; Wu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Kumar, R.; Chen, G.; Lin, S. COVID-19 in posttransplant patients—Report of 2 cases. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1879–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, J.; Miao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhou, P.; Zhou, X.; Chen, Z.; Du, D. Convalescent plasma therapy: Helpful treatment of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient presenting with severe clinical manifestations and complex complications. Clin. Transplant. 2020, 34, e14025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kates, O.S.; Fisher, C.E.; Stankiewicz-Karita, H.C.; Shepherd, A.K.; Church, E.C.; Kapnadak, S.G.; Lease, E.D.; Riedo, F.X.; Rakita, R.M.; Limaye, A.P. Earliest cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) identified in solid organ transplant recipients in the United States. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1885–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kemmner, S.; Guba, M.O.; Schönermarck, U.; Stangl, M.; Fischereder, M. Cyclosporine as a preferred calcineurin inhibitor in renal allograft recipients with COVID-19 infection. Kidney Int. 2020, 98, 507–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, Y.; Kwon, O.; Paek, J.H.; Park, W.Y.; Jin, K.; Hyun, M.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H.A.; Han, S. Two distinct cases with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 2269–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kocak, B.; Arpali, E.; Akyollu, B.; Yelken, B.; Tekin, S.; Kanbay, M.; Turkmen, A.; Kalayoglu, M. Oligosymptomatic Kidney Transplant Patients With COVID-19: Do They Pose a Risk to Other Recipients? Transplant. Proc. 2020, 52, 2663–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kolonko, A.; Dudzicz, S.; Wiecek, A.; Król, R. COVID-19 infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A single-center experience with patients immediately after transplantation. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar, R.N.; Tanna, S.D.; Shetty, A.A.; Stosor, V. COVID-19 in an HIV-positive kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lauterio, A.; Valsecchi, M.; Santambrogio, S.; De Carlis, R.; Merli, M.; Calini, A.; Centonze, L.; Buscemi, V.; Bottiroli, M.; Puoti, M.; et al. Successful recovery from severe COVID-19 pneumonia after kidney transplantation: The interplay between immunosuppression and novel therapy including tocilizumab. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, Q.; Cheng, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Dai, N.; Zeng, L.; Zhu, L.; Guo, W.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; et al. Novel coronavirus infection and acute kidney injury in two renal transplant recipients: A case report. J. Int. Med. Res. 2020, 48, 300060520964009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, B.M.; Hung, I.F.N.; Chan, G.C.W.; Tam, A.R.; Chan, S.S.K.; Wong, B.C.K.; Fukuda, K.; Ohno, T.; Yuen, K.Y.; Chan, T.M. Case of “relapsing” COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient. Nephrology 2020, 25, 933–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Machado, D.J.D.B.; Ianhez, L.E. COVID-19 pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients—Where we are? Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Man, Z.; Jing, Z.; Huibo, S.; Bin, L.; Fanjun, Z. Viral shedding prolongation in a kidney transplant patient with COVID-19 pneumonia. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 2626–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marx, D.; Moulin, B.; Fafi-Kremer, S.; Benotmane, I.; Gautier, G.; Perrin, P.; Caillard, S. First case of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient treated with belatacept. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1944–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meziyerh, S.; Zwart, T.C.; Van Etten, R.W.; Janson, J.A.; Van Gelder, T.; Alwayn, I.P.J.; De Fijter, J.W.; Reinders, M.E.J.; Moes, D.J.A.R.; De Vries, A.P. Severe COVID-19 in a renal transplant recipient: A focus on pharmacokinetics. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1896–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Namazee, N.; Mahmoudi, H.; Afzal, P.; Ghaffari, S. Novel coronavirus 2019 pneumonia in a kidney transplant recipient. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 2599–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ning, L.; Liu, L.; Li, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, D.; Nashan, B.; Shen, A.; et al. Novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a renal transplant recipient: Case report. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1864–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Sakulkonkij, P.; Bruminhent, J.; Pankongngam, C.; Chalermphunchai, N. A family cluster of diagnosed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) kidney transplant recipient in Thailand. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2020, 8, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Seminari, E.; Colaneri, M.; Sambo, M.; Gallazzi, I.; Di Matteo, A.; Roda, S.; Bruno, R.; the COVID19 IRCCS San Matteo Pavia Task Force. SARS Cov-2 infection in a renal-transplanted patient: A case report. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1882–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shingare, A.; Bahadur, M.M.; Raina, S. COVID-19 in recent kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3206–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Antony, S.J.; Singh, J.; De Jesus, M.; Lance, J. Early use of tocilizumab in respiratory failure associated with acute COVID -19 pneumonia in recipients with solid organ transplantation. IDCases 2020, 21, e00888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Suwanwongse, K.; Shabarek, N. Fatal Outcome in a Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipient With COVID-19. Cureus 2020, 12, e8691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tanaka, R.; Kakuta, Y.; Tsutahara, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Ichimaru, N.; Sakaguchi, K.; Kato, T.; Imamura, R.; Nonomura, N.; Takao, T. Successful recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 in a living kidney transplant recipient using low-dose methylprednisolone. IJU Case Rep. 2021, 4, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tantisattamo, E.; Reddy, U.G.; Duong, D.K.; Ferrey, A.J.; Ichii, H.; Dafoe, D.C.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Hyponatremia: A possible immuno-neuroendocrine interface with COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thammathiwat, T.; Tungsanga, S.; Tiankanon, K.; Torvorapanit, P.; Chumpangern, W.; Udomkarnjananun, S.; Avihingsanon, Y.; Sriprasart, T.; Srisawat, N.; Jutivorakool, K.; et al. A case of successful treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with favipiravir and tocilizumab in post–kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tzukert, K.; Abel, R.; Levi, I.M.Y.; Gork, I.; Orpaz, L.Y.; Azmanov, H.; Elhalel, M.D. The Challenge of Treating Kidney Transplant Recipients Infected with COVID-19: Report of the First Cases in Israel. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2020, 22, 602–604. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Velioglu, A.; Tuglular, S. Care of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive kidney transplant recipients. Transpl. Int. 2020, 33, 1331–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, J.; Li, X.; Cao, G.; Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Yan, T. COVID-19 in a Kidney Transplant Patient. Eur. Urol. 2020, 77, 769–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, A.X.; Cardona, O.Q.; Ho, D.Y.; Busque, S.; Lenihan, C.R. Influence of immunosuppression on seroconversion against SARS-CoV-2 in two kidney transplant recipients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, J.J.; Samaha, D.; Mondhe, S.; Massicotte-Azarniouch, D.; Knoll, G.; Ruzicka, M. Renal infarct in a COVID-19–positive kidney–pancreas transplant recipient. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3221–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhong, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, H.; Wang, A.; Liang, W.; Zhou, W.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.; Rao, L.; Li, Z.; et al. Clinical characteristics and immunosuppressant management of coronavirus disease 2019 in solid organ transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1916–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Zhu, L.; Shu, H.; Li, H.; Qiu, T.; Zhou, J.; Chen, G. Slow Recovery from Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in an Immunosuppressed Renal Transplant Recipient with Early Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome. Cardiorenal Med. 2020, 10, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, L.; Xu, X.; Ma, K.; Yang, J.; Guan, H.; Chen, S.; Chen, Z.; Chen, G. Successful recovery of COVID-19 pneumonia in a renal transplant recipient with long-term immunosuppression. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1859–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Akalin, E.; Azzi, Y.; Bartash, R.; Seethamraju, H.; Parides, M.; Hemmige, V.; Ross, M.; Forest, S.; Goldstein, Y.D.; Ajaimy, M.; et al. Covid-19 and Kidney Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2475–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Alberici, F.; Delbarba, E.; Manenti, C.; Econimo, L.; Valerio, F.; Pola, A.; Maffei, C.; Possenti, S.; Zambetti, N.; Moscato, M.; et al. A single center observational study of the clinical characteristics and short-term outcome of 20 kidney transplant patients admitted for SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Kidney Int. 2020, 97, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Banerjee, D.; Popoola, J.; Shah, S.; Ster, I.C.; Quan, V.; Phanish, M. COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2020, 97, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bösch, F.; Börner, N.; Kemmner, S.; Lampert, C.; Jacob, S.; Koliogiannis, D.; Stangl, M.; Michel, S.; Kneidinger, N.; Schneider, C.; et al. Attenuated early inflammatory response in solid organ recipients with COVID-19. Clin. Transplant. 2020, 34, e14027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chen, T.Y.; Farghaly, S.; Cham, S.; Tatem, L.L.; Sin, J.H.; Rauda, R.; Ribisi, M.; Sumrani, N. COVID-19 pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients: Focus on immunosuppression management. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. The Columbia University Kidney Transplant Program. Early Description of Coronavirus 2019 Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients in New York. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020, 31, 1150–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Crespo, M.; Pérez-Sáez, M.J.; Redondo-Pachón, D.; Llinàs-Mallol, L.; Montero, M.M.; Villar-García, J.; Arias-Cabrales, C.; Buxeda, A.; Burballa, C.; Vázquez, S.; et al. COVID-19 in elderly kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 2883–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Devresse, A.; Belkhir, L.; Vo, B.; Ghaye, B.; Scohy, A.; Kabamba, B.; Goffin, E.; De Greef, J.; Mourad, M.; De Meyer, M.; et al. COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Case Series of 22 Cases From Belgium. Kidney Med. 2020, 2, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elias, M.; Pievani, D.; Randoux, C.; Louis, K.; Denis, B.; DeLion, A.; Le Goff, O.; Antoine, C.; Greze, C.; Pillebout, E.; et al. COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Disease Incidence and Clinical Outcomes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020, 31, 2413–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Andrés, A.; Loinaz, C.; Delgado, J.F.; López-Medrano, F.; Juan, R.S.; González, E.; Polanco, N.; Folgueira, M.D.; Lalueza, A.; et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: A single-center case series from Spain. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fung, M.; Chiu, C.Y.; DeVoe, C.; Doernberg, S.B.; Schwartz, B.S.; Langelier, C.; Henrich, T.J.; Yokoe, D.; Davis, J.; Hays, S.R.; et al. Clinical outcomes and serologic response in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: A case series from the United States. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3225–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hartzell, S.; Bin, S.; Benedetti, C.; Haverly, M.; Gallon, L.; Zaza, G.; Riella, L.V.; Menon, M.C.; Florman, S.; Rahman, A.H.; et al. Evidence of potent humoral immune activity in COVID-19-infected kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 16261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lubetzky, M.; Aull, M.J.; Craig-Schapiro, R.; Lee, J.R.; Marku-Podvorica, J.; Salinas, T.; Gingras, L.; Lee, J.B.; Sultan, S.; Kodiyanplakkal, R.P.; et al. Kidney allograft recipients, immunosuppression, and coronavirus disease-2019: A report of consecutive cases from a New York City transplant center. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2020, 35, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Maritati, F.; Cerutti, E.; Zuccatosta, L.; Fiorentini, A.; Finale, C.; Ficosecco, M.; Cristiano, F.; Capestro, A.; Balestra, E.; Taruscia, D.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in kidney transplant recipients: Experience of the italian marche region. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mehta, S.A.; Leonard, J.; Labella, P.; Cartiera, K.; Soomro, I.; Neumann, H.; Montgomery, R.A.; Ali, N.M. Outpatient management of kidney transplant recipients with suspected COVID-19—Single-center experience during the New York City surge. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mella, A.; Mingozzi, S.; Gallo, E.; Lavacca, A.; Rossetti, M.; Clari, R.; Randone, O.; Maffei, S.; Salomone, M.; Imperiale, D.; et al. Case series of six kidney transplanted patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with tocilizumab. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, 13348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Monfared, A.; Dashti-Khavidaki, S.; Jafari, R.; Jafari, A.; Ramezanzade, E.; Lebadi, M.; Haghdar-Saheli, Y.; Aghajanzadeh, P.; Khosravi, M.; Movassaghi, A.; et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients in Razi hospital, Rasht, Iran. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nair, V.; Jandovitz, N.; Hirsch, J.S.; Nair, G.; Abate, M.; Bhaskaran, M.; Grodstein, E.; Berlinrut, I.; Hirschwerk, D.; Cohen, S.L.; et al. COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1819–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pierrotti, L.C.; Reusing, J.O., Jr.; Freire, M.P.; Machado, D.J.B.; Moreira, R.M.; Ventura, C.G.; Litvoc, M.N.; Nahas, W.C.; David-Neto, E. COVID-19 among kidney-transplant recipients requiring hospitalization: Preliminary data and outcomes from a single-center in Brazil. Transpl. Int. 2020, 33, 1837–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rodriguez-Cubillo, B.; De La Higuera, M.A.M.; Lucena, R.; Franci, E.V.; Hurtado, M.; Romero, N.C.; Moreno, A.R.; Valencia, D.; Velo, M.; Fornie, I.S.; et al. Should cyclosporine be useful in renal transplant recipients affected by SARS-CoV-2? Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3173–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Silva, F.; Cipriano, A.; Cruz, H.; Tavares, J.; Fragoso, J.; Malheiro, J.; Almeida, M.; Martins, L.S.; Abreu, M.; Pedroso, S.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in kidney transplant recipients: Early report of five cases. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Trujillo, H.; Caravaca-Fontán, F.; Sevillano, Á.; Gutiérrez, E.; Caro, J.; Gutiérrez, E.; Yuste, C.; Andrés, A.; Praga, M. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients with Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. Rep. 2020, 5, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhu, L.; Gong, N.; Liu, B.; Lu, X.; Chen, D.; Chen, S.; Shu, H.; Ma, K.; Xu, X.; Guo, Z.; et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Immunosuppressed Renal Transplant Recipients: A Summary of 10 Confirmed Cases in Wuhan, China. Eur. Urol. 2020, 78, e158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Deeks, J.J.; Dinnes, J.; D’Amico, R.; Sowden, A.J.; Sakarovitch, C.; Song, F.; Petticrew, M.; Altman, D.G. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol. Assess. 2003, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. 11 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-directorgeneral-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  84. Hilbrands, L.B.; Duivenvoorden, R.; Vart, P.; Franssen, C.F.M.; Hemmelder, M.H.; Jager, K.J.; Kieneker, L.M.; Noordzij, M.; Pena, M.J.; de Vries, H.; et al. COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and dialysis patients: Results of the ERACODA collaboration. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2020, 35, 1973–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. ERA EDTA Registry. 22 June 2020. Available online: https://www.era-edta.org/en/registry/projects-and-collaborations/covid-19/ (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  86. Tu, G.; Ju, M.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, M.; Rong, R.; Zhu, D.; Zhu, T.; Luo, Z. Early- and late-onset severe pneumonia after renal transplantation. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar]
  87. Gagliardi, I.; Patella, G.; Michael, A.; Serra, R.; Provenzano, M.; Andreucci, M. COVID-19 and the Kidney: From Epidemiology to Clinical Practice. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Molaei, H.; Khedmat, L.; Nemati, E.; Rostami, Z.; Saadat, S.H. Iranian kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 infection: Clinical outcomes and cytomegalovirus coinfection. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, 13455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, J.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Liang, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, W.; Tong, Q.; Yi, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. EBioMedicine 2020, 55, 102763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hu, Q.; Zhong, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Ye, S.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Q. Management of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A summary of 41 confirmed cases reported worldwide. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Clinical Insights for Hepatology and Liver Transplant Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. 23 March 2020. Available online: https://www.aasld.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/AASLD-COVID19ExpertPanelConsensusStatement-November092020.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
  92. Ma-Lauer, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Malešević, M.; Von Brunn, B.; Fischer, G.; Von Brunn, A. Influences of cyclosporin A and non-immunosuppressive derivatives on cellular cyclophilins and viral nucleocapsid protein during human coronavirus 229E replication. Antivir. Res. 2020, 173, 104620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cavagna, L.; Seminari, E.; Zanframundo, G.; Gregorini, M.; Di Matteo, A.; Rampino, T.; Montecucco, C.; Pelenghi, S.; Cattadori, B.; Pattonieri, E.F.; et al. Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppression and COVID-19: Results from a Multidisciplinary Cohort of Patients in Northern Italy. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shen, L.; Niu, J.; Wang, C.; Huang, B.; Wang, W.; Zhu, N.; Deng, Y.; Wang, H.; Ye, F.; Cen, S.; et al. High-Throughput Screening and Identification of Potent Broad-Spectrum Inhibitors of Coronaviruses. J. Virol. 2019, 93, 00023-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rodriguez-Morales, A.J.; Cardona-Ospina, J.A.; Gutiérrez-Ocampo, E.; Villamizar-Peña, R.; Holguin-Rivera, Y.; Escalera-Antezana, J.P.; Alvarado-Arnez, L.E.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Henao-Martinez, A.F.; et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 34, 101623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kindrachuk, J.; Ork, B.; Hart, B.J.; Mazur, S.; Holbrook, M.R.; Frieman, M.B.; Traynor, D.; Johnson, R.F.; Dyall, J.; Kuhn, J.H.; et al. Antiviral Potential of ERK/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Modulation for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection as Identified by Temporal Kinome Analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 1088–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Takahashi, N.; Hayano, T.; Suzuki, M. Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase is the cyclosporin A-binding protein cyclophilin. Nat. Cell Biol. 1989, 337, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Harding, M.W.; Galat, A.; Uehling, D.E.; Schreiber, S.L. A receptor for the immunosuppressant FK506 is a cis-trans peptidyl-prolyl isomerase. Nature 1989, 337, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Flanagan, W.M.; Corthésy, B.; Bram, R.J.; Crabtree, G.R. Nuclear association of a T-cell transcription factor blocked by FK-506 and cyclosporin A. Nat. Cell Biol. 1991, 352, 803–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. De Wilde, A.H.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.C.; Van Der Meer, Y.; Thiel, V.; Narayanan, K.; Makino, S.; Snijder, E.J.; Van Hemert, M.J. Cyclosporin A inhibits the replication of diverse coronaviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2011, 92, 2542–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mirjalili, M.; Shafiekhani, M.; Vazin, A. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Transplantation: Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Immunosuppression Regimen. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2020, 16, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Horby, P.; Lim, W.S.; Emberson, J.R.; Mafham, M.; Bell, J.L.; Linsell, L.; Staplin, N.; Brightling, C.; Ustianowski, A.; Elmahi, E.; et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19—Preliminary Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, nejmoa2021436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chihrin, S.; Loutfy, M.R. Overview of antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2005, 3, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Russell, B.; Moss, C.; George, G.; Santaolalla, A.; Cope, A.; Papa, S.; Van Hemelrijck, M. Associations between immune-suppressive and stimulating drugs and novel COVID-19—a systematic review of current evidence. Ecancermedicalscience 2020, 14, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Sarkar, S.; Khanna, P.; Soni, K.D. Are the steroids a blanket solution for COVID-19? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1538–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Imam, A.; Tzukert, K.; Merhav, H.; Imam, R.; Abu-Gazala, S.; Abel, R.; Elhalel, M.D.; Khalaileh, A. Practical recommendations for kidney transplantation in the COVID-19 pandemic. World J. Transplant. 2020, 10, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Nashan, B. Antibody Induction Therapy in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Calcineurin-Inhibitor Immunosuppressive Regimens. BioDrugs 2005, 19, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Akalin, E.; Sehgal, V.; Ames, S.; Hossain, S.; Daly, L.; Barbara, M.; Bromberg, J.S. Cytomegalovirus Disease in High-Risk Transplant Recipients Despite Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir Prophylaxis. Am. J. Transplant. 2003, 3, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mourad, G.; Garrigue, V.; Squifflet, J.P.; Besse, T.; Berthoux, F.; Alamartine, E.; Durand, D.; Rostaing, L.; Lang, P.; Baron, C.; et al. Induction versus noninduction in renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Transplantation 2001, 72, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cai, J.; Terasaki, P.I. Induction Immunosuppression Improves Long-Term Graft and Patient Outcome in Organ Transplantation: An Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Data. Transplantation 2010, 90, 1511–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Bamoulid, J.; Staeck, O.; Crépin, T.; Halleck, F.; Saas, P.; Brakemeier, S.; Ducloux, D.; Budde, K. Anti-thymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: Focus on current indications and long-term immunological side effects. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2016, 32, 1601–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Hellemans, R.; Bosmans, J.; Abramowicz, D. Induction Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Do We Still Need Anti-IL2 Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies? Am. J. Transplant. 2017, 17, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Fishman, J.A. Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 2601–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Fishman, J.A. Infection in Organ Transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2017, 17, 856–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Gralla, J.; Wiseman, A.C. The Impact of IL2ra Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation Using Tacrolimus- and Mycophenolate-Based Immunosuppression. Transplantation 2010, 90, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Webster, A.C.; Taylor, R.R.; Chapman, J.R.; Craig, J.C. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005, 4, CD003961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Ekberg, H.; Tedesco-Silva, H.; Demirbas, A.; Vítko, Š.; Nashan, B.; Guerkan, A.; Margreiter, R.; Hugo, C.; Grinyó, J.M.; Frei, U.; et al. Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 2562–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Favi, E.; Gargiulo, A.; Spagnoletti, G.; Salerno, M.; Silvestrini, N.; Valente, I.; Citterio, F. Induction with Basiliximab Plus Thymoglobulin Is Effective and Safe in Old-for-Old Renal Transplantation: Six-Month Results of a Prospective Clinical Study. Transplant. Proc. 2010, 42, 1114–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 57 00435 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the literature search and study selection.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the literature search and study selection.
Medicina 57 00435 g001
Table
Table 1. Case reports of kidney transplant recipients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) included in the analysis.
Table 1. Case reports of kidney transplant recipients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) included in the analysis.
AuthorsRegion/CountryN° ptsType of StudyIS ModificationsOutcomesHD NecessityGraft Loss
[11] Akdur et al.Ankara, Turkey1Case ReportWithdrawal (AD+Tac)AliveNoNo
[12] Allam et al.Fort Worth, TX, USA1Case ReportAD withdrawal, Tac reductionAliveNoNo
[13] Bartiromo et al.Florence, Italy1Case ReportTac withdrawalAliveNoNo
[14] Billah et al.New York, NT, USA1Case ReportTac reduction (AD stable)AliveYesYes
[15] Bussalino et al.Genova, Italy1Case ReportNone (Tac+AD stable)AliveNoNo
[16] Chen et al.Wuhan, China1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[17] Cheng et al.Nanjiing, China2Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[18] Chenna et al.Albany, NY, USA1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)DiedNoDwGF
[19] Dahl et alAarhus N, Denmark1Case ReportNone (Tac stable)AliveNoNo
[20] Dirim et al.Istanbul, Turkey1Case ReportAD withdrawal, Tac reductionDiedYesYes
[21] Fontana et al.Modena, Italy1Case ReportCyA withdrawalAliveNoNo
[22] Gandolfini et al.Parma, Italy2Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)Alive (1)/
Died (1)		NoDwGF (1)
No (1)
[23] Guillen et al.Barcelona, Spain1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+mTOR)AliveNoNo
[24] Hasan Ahmad et al.Ipswich, UK1Case ReportWithdrawal (AD+BELAT)AliveNoNo
[25] Hsu et al.Los Angeles, CA, USA1Case ReportAD withdrawal, Tac stableAliveNoNo
[26] Huang et al.Fuzhou, China1Case ReportWithdrawal (AD)DiedYesYes
[27] Jiang et al.Wuhan, China1Case ReportCyA Withdrawal, AD reductionAliveNANA
[28] Kates et al.Seattle, WA, USA1Case ReportAD withdrawal, Tac reductionAliveNoNo
[29] Kemmner et al.Munich, Germany1Case ReportAD withdrawal, CyA introductionAliveNoNo
[30] Kim et al.Daegu, Korea2Case ReportTac withdrawal (1)/Tac stable (1),
AD withdrawal (2)		AliveNoNo
[31] Kocak et al.Istanbul, Turkey2Case ReportAD withdrawal (2), Tac reduced (1)/
Tac withdrawal (1)		AliveNoNo
[32] Kolonko et al.Katowice, Poland3Case ReportAD withdrawal (1)/AD reduction (2),
Tac stable (2)/Tac reduction (1)		Died (1)/
Alive (2)		NoNo (2)
DwGF (1)
[33] Kumar et al.Chicago, IL, USA1Case ReportReduction (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[34] Lauterio et al.Milan, Italy1Case ReportWithdrawal (CyA+mTORi)AliveNoNo
[35] Li.QPeking, China2Case ReportCyA withdrawal (1) Tac withdrawal (1),
AD withdrawal (1)		Died (1)NoWorsening (1)
[36] Ma et al.Hong Kong1Case ReportTac withdrawal, AD reductionAliveNoNo
[37] Machado et al.Sao Paulo, Brazil1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[38] Man et al.Wuhan, China1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[39] Marx et al.Strasbourg, France1Case ReportWithdrawal (AD+BELAC)AliveNoNo
[40] Meziyerh et al.Leiden, the Netherlands1Case ReportWithdrawal (mTORi)AliveNoWorsening
[41] Namazee et al.Semnan, Iran1Case ReportWithdrawal (CyA+AD)DiedNoYes
[42] Ning et al.Hefei, China1Case ReportStable (CyA+AD)AliveNoNo
[43] Sakulkonkij et al.Lampang, Thailand1Case ReportTac reduction, AD withdrawalAliveNoNo
[44] Seminari et al.Pavia, Italy1Case ReportStable (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[45] Shingare et al.Mumbai, India2Case ReportReduction (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[46] Sj Antony et al.El Paso, TX, USA1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[47] Suwanwongse et al.New York, NY, USA1Case ReportTac withdrawal, AD stableDiedYesYes
[48] Tanaka et alOsaka, Japan1Case ReportTac stable, AD withdrawal, mTORi withdrawalAliveNoNo
[49] Tantisattamo et al.Orange, CA, USA1Case ReportAD withdrawal, Tac stableAliveNoNo
[50] Thammathiwat et al.Bangkok, Thailand1Case ReportWithdrawal (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[51] Tzukert T. et al.Jerusalem, Israel2Case ReportTac stable (2), AD withdrawal (1)/AD stable (1)AliveNoNo
[52] Velioglu et al.Istanbul, Turkey1Case ReportAD withdrawal, Tac stableAliveNoNo
[53] Wang et al.Zhengzhou, China1Case ReportStable (CyA+AD)AliveNoNo
[54] Wang et al.Stanford, CA, USA2Case ReportTac stable (2), AD withdrawal (2)AliveNoNo
[55] Xu et al.Ottawa, Canada1Case ReportTac withdrawal, AD stableAliveNoNo
[56] Zhong et al.Wuhan, China1Case ReportReduction (Tac+AD)AliveNoNo
[57] Zhu et al.Wuhan, China1Case ReportTac reduction, AD withdrawalAliveNoNo
[58] Zhu et al.Wuhan, China1Case ReportTac withdrawal, AD withdrawalAliveNoNo
Abbreviations: AD = antimetabolite drug, BELAT = belatacept, CyA = cyclosporine A, DwGF = death with graft functioning, IS = immunosuppressive, mTORi = mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, n = number, NA = not available, pts = patients, SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Tac = tacrolimus.
Table
Table 2. Case series and prospective studies of kidney transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 included in the analysis.
Table 2. Case series and prospective studies of kidney transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 included in the analysis.
AuthorsRegion/CountryN° ptsType of StudyIS ModificationsMortality Rate
(%)		HD Necessity (%)Graft Loss (%)DwFG
(%)
[59] Akalin et al.Bronx, NY, USA36Case seriesAD withdrawal (24)/stable (7),
Tac withdrawal (6)/stable (29)		27.7%NANANA
[60] Alberici et al.Brescia, Italy20Case seriesIS Withdrawal
[Tac (19), AD (14), mTOR (2)]		25%5%25%20%
[61] Banerjee et al.London, UK.7Case seriesAD withdrawal (5)/stable (2),
Tac stable (4)/reduction (1)/withdrawal (1)		14.3%42.9%42.9%–
[62] Bosch et al.Munich, Germany3Case seriesAD withdrawal (3), Tac withdrawal (1),
Cya started (2)		33.3%33.3%33.3%–
[63] Chen et al.Brooklyn, NY, USA30Case seriesAD Withdrawal (12), Tac withdrawal (26), CyA withdrawal (3)20%13.3%20%6.7%
[64] Columbia UniversityNew York, NY, USA15Case seriesAD withdrawal (12),
Tac stable (11)/reduction (2)/withdrawal (1)		6.7%13.3%13.3%–
[65] Crespo et al.Barcelona, Spain16Case seriesAD withdrawal (8),
mTORi withdrawal (4)/stable (1),
Tac withdrawal (8)/stable (6)		50%18.8%18.8%–
[66] Devresse et al.Brussels, Belgium22Case seriesAD withdrawal (18)/stable (1),
Tac reduction (9)/stable (1),
CyA withdrawal (2)/stable (3),
mTORi withdrawal (1)/reduction (2)		9.1%–9.1%9.1%
[67] Elias et al.Paris, France66Prospective studyAD withdrawal (39)/stable (22),
Tac withdrawal (3)/stable (54),
BELAT postponed (1)/regular (5)		24.2%10.6%24.2%13.6%
[68] Fernandez-Riuz et al.Madrid, Spain8Case seriesAD withdrawal (5)/reduction (1),
Tac reduction (6)/stable (1),
mTORi withdrawal (1)		25%NANANA
[69] Fung et al.San Francisco, CA, USA7Case seriesAD reduction (1), Tac reduction (2)0%14.3%––
[70] Hartzell et al.New York, NY, USA18Case seriesAD withdrawal (5)/reduction (13),
Tac withdrawal (1)/stable (17)		38.9%–38.9%38.9%
[71] Lubetzky et al.New York, NY, USA54Case seriesAD withdrawal (24)/reduction (15),
Tac reduction (17)/stable (35)		12.96%7.4%5.55%NA
[72] Maritati et al.Ancona, Italy5Case seriesAD withdrawal (4), Tac withdrawal (5), mTORi withdrawal (1)40%20%40%20%
[73] Mehta et al.New York, NY, USA34Case seriesAD withdrawal (26)/reduction (6)/stable (1), Tac stable (29), Cya stable (1),
mTOR stable (1)		17.6%–17.6%17.6%
[74] Mella et al.Turin, Italy6Case seriesAD withdrawal (3),
Tac withdrawal (6)		66.7%33.3%66.7%33.3%
[75] Monfaret et al.Rasht Iran22Case SeriesCNI withdrawal (5)/reduction (13)/stable (3), AD withdrawal (21)/stable (1),
mTOR withdrawal (1)
27.3%		NANANA
[76] Nair et al.New York, USA10Case SeriesTac stable (7)/withdrawal (2),
AD stable (1)/withdrawal (8),
mTORi stable (1)/withdrawal (19)		30%10%30%20%
[77] Pierotti et al.Sao Paulo, Brazil
51Case seriesTac reduction (32)/withdrawal (12),
AD withdrawal (32)/stable (14),
mTORi withdrawal (4),
CyA withdrawal (7)		25.5%25.5%25.5%–
[78] Rodriguez-Cubillo et al.Madrid, Spain29Case seriesAD withdrawal (22),
Tac reduction (1)/withdrawal (15),
CyA start (23)/stable (6)		20.7%10.3%20.7%10.3%
[79] Silva et al.Porto, Portugal5Case seriesAD withdrawal (5),
Tac reduction (3)/stable (1),
Cya withdrawal (1)
20%		–20%20%
[80] Trujillo et al.Madrid, Spain26Case seriesAD withdrawal (13)/stable (1),
Tac withdrawal (4)/stable (20),
mTORi withdrawal (2)/stable (5)
23.1%		–23.1%23.1%
[81] Zhu et al.Wuhan, China10Case–control studyAD withdrawal (9)/stable (1),
Tac withdrawal (7)/reduction (1)/stable (2)		10%––Worsening of graft function (10%)
Abbreviations: AD = antimetabolite drug, BELAT = belatacept, CNI = calcineurin inhibitors (used when the difference between Tac and Cya was not specified), CyA = cyclosporine A, DwGF = death with graft functioning, IS = immunosuppressive, mTORi = mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, n = number, NA = not available, pts = patients, SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Tac = tacrolimus.
Table
Table 3. Management of immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Table 3. Management of immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Type of IS DrugsTotalWithdrawalReductionNo Modification
CNI:502160 (31.9%)99 (19.7%)243 (48.4%)
-Tac453138 (30.5%)86 (19.0%)229 (50.6%)
-Cya2817 (60.7%)0 (0%)11 (39.3%)
-not specified215 (23.8%)13 (61.9%)3 (14.3%)
ADs461347 (75.3%)44 (9.5%)70 (15.2%)
mTOR inhibitors4838 (79.2%)2 (4.1%)8 (16.6%)
Note: Summaries based on individual cases should not be considered as an estimate of the real world. Abbreviations: AD = antimetabolite drugs, TAC = tacrolimus, CyA = cyclosporine A, mTOR inhibitors = mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Angelico, R.; Blasi, F.; Manzia, T.M.; Toti, L.; Tisone, G.; Cacciola, R. The Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Disease: An Update and Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicina 2021, 57, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050435

AMA Style

Angelico R, Blasi F, Manzia TM, Toti L, Tisone G, Cacciola R. The Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Disease: An Update and Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicina. 2021; 57(5):435. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050435

Chicago/Turabian Style

Angelico, Roberta, Francesca Blasi, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Luca Toti, Giuseppe Tisone, and Roberto Cacciola. 2021. "The Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Disease: An Update and Systematic Review of the Literature" Medicina 57, no. 5: 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050435

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop