Next Article in Journal
Cu and Zn Interactions with Peptides Revealed by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Baccharis trimera Infusion Reduces Macrophages Activation and High-Fat Diet-Induced Metabolic Disorders in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Importance of Rose Bengal Loaded with Nanoparticles for Anti-Cancer Photodynamic Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors and Practices Associated with Self-Medicating Children among Mexican Parents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Medicinal Plants from Latin America with Wound Healing Activity: Ethnomedicine, Phytochemistry, Preclinical and Clinical Studies—A Review

by
Anuar Salazar-Gómez
1 and
Angel Josabad Alonso-Castro
2,*
1
Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ENES-León UNAM), Blvd. UNAM 2011, Guanajuato 37684, Mexico
2
Departamento de Farmacia, Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta, Colonia Noria Alta Guanajuato, Guanajuato 36250, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(9), 1095; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091095
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethnopharmacology in Latin America)

Abstract

:
Latin America is a multicultural region with ancient traditional medicine. There is extensive knowledge of the use of medicinal plants for wound healing in this region. Nevertheless, many of these medicinal plants lack pharmacological, toxicological, and chemical studies. This review focuses on the ethnomedicinal, phytochemical, and pharmacological (preclinical and clinical) studies of medicinal plants with wound healing activity, from Latin America. An electronic database search was conducted by consulting scientific articles and books. A total of 305 plant species with wound healing activity were recorded, based on traditional medicine. Most medicinal plants used in wound healing in Latin America are topically administered; their methods of preparation are mainly by water infusion from aerial parts. Only thirty-five percent of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine for wound healing have been experimentally validated for their pharmacological effects, and the wound healing activity of five medicinal plants has been studied in clinical trials. In all, 25 compounds (mostly terpenes and flavonoids) have been isolated from medicinal plants with wound healing activity; therefore, extensive work is necessary for a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the wound healing effects of medicinal plants in Latin America. The mechanism of action of medicinal plants, their toxicological actions on the skin, and their bioactive compounds, have yet to be investigated. This review on the ethnomedicinal, phytochemical, and pharmacological studies, of medicinal plants from Latin America with wound healing activity, offers promising data for further studies, as well as providing new insights into their possible role in wound care.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Skin is the primary barrier that confers protection to the body against physical, biological, and chemical agents. Wounds are breaks, or openings, in the epithelium and can cause physical disability. Untreated wounds might result in hematomas and lacerations. Wound healing could be acute or chronic and focuses on decreasing tissue damage, increasing tissue perfusion and oxygenation, restoring the affected tissue, inducing migration and proliferation of keratinocytes, and promoting angiogenesis. Wound healing is a natural process for repairing and regenerating tissue damage and consists of hemostasis (coagulation), inflammation, proliferation (angiogenesis, granulation, re-epithelialization), and tissue remodeling phases [1,2]. In the hemostasis stage of wound healing, injured blood vessels rapidly constrict and platelet aggregation takes place to clot formation, providing a scaffold for incoming inflammatory cells. Inflammation, the second stage in the wound healing processes, occurs 5–7 h after skin disruption and involves the participation of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukins (IL)-6 and IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and growth factors such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), that promote vasoconstriction and the activation of neutrophils and macrophages to fight infection and remove debris [3]. At this stage, many opportunistic microorganisms might infect the tissue. Depending on the size of the wound, clot formation and re-epithelization occur 2–4 days after skin disruption and consist of: proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts (attracted by several factors including TGF-β); the synthesis and deposition of collagen and fibronectin in the wounded area; the formation of a new provisional extracellular matrix; and the regeneration of parenchymal and connective tissue cells [1]. Collagen, composed of hydroxyproline, is the main component that provides strength and support to extracellular tissue. In this phase of the wound healing process, the activation of angiogenesis, regulated by the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), occurs. The fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet activation factor (PAF), and TGF-β are important elements during this process. During tissue remodeling, epithelial tissue is regenerated, the scar is formed, and leukocyte infiltration and edema are decreased, whereas tensile strength of the skin is increased [1]. Myofibroblasts contract fibers to close wound surfaces. Tissue remodeling can last 1–2 years after skin disruption. Nevertheless, impaired wound healing is affected by age, obesity, diabetes, alcoholism, and other immunity conditions [1].
Latin America is a multicultural region encompassing 43 countries, and was the settlement of many pre-Hispanic civilizations. Their knowledge and culture still remain. This region is the home of over 50 million indigenous people, belonging to 400 ethnic groups [4]. Folk knowledge was incorporated into many pharmacopeias from this region. Latin America has many endemic medicinal plants; however, this region is facing a loss of biodiversity [5]. The migration to rural areas leads to the loss of ethnomedicinal information. In Latin America, using medicinal plants for primary health care is a common practice among the general population, due to the lack/insufficient medical attention, and the lack of economic resources. Around 15% of all plant species in the world have scientific studies about their pharmacology, chemical composition, and toxicology; this indicates the need to carry out more studies on medicinal plants [6]. Ethnopharmacology encompasses the use of traditional knowledge to obtain new drugs from natural resources, with the participation of disciplines such as taxonomy, pharmacology, toxicology, anthropology, biochemistry, and others.
This review highlights the ethnobotany, pharmacology, and phytochemistry of Latin American medicinal plants used for wound healing. Preclinical and clinical studies are analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, formulations containing medicinal herbs are also discussed. The pharmacological treatment of wound healing also includes the oral and topical administration of agents such as analgesics and antibiotics. Nevertheless, these drugs induce several adverse effects; therefore, discovering new agents that accelerate wound healing is highly desirable. This review is essential for further studies on the wound healing activity of medicinal plants from Latin America.

2. Results

2.1. Ethnomedicinal Information

A total of 305 plant species were recorded with wound healing activity, based on traditional medicine (Table 1). Most of the ethnomedicinal information was gathered from bibliographic sources dated from the last 20 years. Piper genus recorded the highest number (10) of plant species, followed by Croton (six members), and Solanum (five members) genera. The Asteraceae family recorded the highest (42 members) number of plants with wound healing properties, followed by the Fabaceae family (39 members). Only 18% of medicinal plants are orally administered. The main method of preparation is by infusion (36%), followed by decoction (24%), pulverized plant parts (12%), cataplasm (9%), maceration (7%), decoction (6%), and others. The main plant part used are leaves (38%), followed by bark (15%), whole plant (13%), aerial parts (11%), latex (8%), roots (7%), and others. This information shows that medicinal plants used for wound healing in Latin America are topically administered, and the extraction is mainly carried out by infusion with water of aerial parts. The main phytochemical components of the Piper genus are alkaloids, terpenes, lignans, and chalcones [7]. These compounds can be poorly extracted with water. Nevertheless, this genus also contains water-extractable compounds such as flavonoids [7]. Further chemical, pharmacological, and toxicological studies, should be performed with the Piper genus.

2.2. Preclinical Wound Healing Research

A total of 108 species (35%) belonging to 50 families had pharmacological evidence of wound healing activity in preclinical and/or clinical studies. Members of the Asteraceae and Fabaceae families had the highest number of reports on wound healing activity. It is a common trend that, in Latin America, these two botanical families contain a high number of members with medicinal effects [5,8,9,10,11].
Of the 108 plant species with pharmacological activity tested, 66 (61%) had ethnomedicinal information of wound healing activity (Table 1). This finding indicates that 39% of plants (i.e., Pereskia aculeata Mill. and Plinia peruviana (Poir.) Govaerts) with pharmacological studies on wound healing activity did not consider folk medicinal knowledge. Traditional knowledge is a tool for finding new drugs. For instance, valepotriates (e.g., valtrate, acevaltrate, and didro-valtrate) with sedative actions were isolated from Valeriana officinalis L., a medicinal plant used for the folk treatment of anxiety and other mental disorders. On the contrary, drugs such as paclitaxel were not isolated following ethnomedicinal information, due to Taxus brevifolia Nutt. was used as a diuretic and bronchodilator agent in traditional medicine [6].
In our literature search, 123 preclinical studies on the wound healing activity of medicinal plants were identified and categorized in extracts with in vitro and in vivo wound healing activity (Table 2 and Table 3), and in vivo wound healing activity of plant extracts with different pharmaceutical formulations (Table 4). A total of 39 plant species were investigated for in vitro wound healing activity; four of these plant species lacked wound healing effects (Table 2). The most frequently used plant parts investigated were leaves, with 24 species, followed by aerial parts (16 species), bark (three species), and fruit (two species), among others. Although aqueous extracts are frequently used in folk medicine, ethanol was the most reported solvent for performing wound healing assays (74%), followed by hexane (33%), methanol (10%), and others. Although infusions are frequently used in folk medicine, ethanolic extracts are used the most for performing wound healing assays. Thus, it would be interesting to validate the activity and safety of the most traditional preparations and identify their bioactive compounds. Compounds such as 3α-hydroxymasticadienoic acid (1), 3β, 6β, 16β-trihydroxylup-20(29)-ene (11), 1,2 tetradecanediol, 1-hydrogen sulfate, sodium (17), and others mentioned in this review (Table 5), are easier to isolate using nonpolar solvents. In this case, the use of solvents (water or ethanol), commonly used in traditional medicine, could not be useful to obtain these kinds of compounds. Some of the studies employed two or more solvents, such as hydroalcoholic solutions. The combination of different solvents could increase the obtention of compounds such as terpenes.
The in vitro scratch assay was the method of choice for studying the wound healing activity of these plants, and Swiss 3T3 was the most frequently used cell line, followed by HaCaT and L929. Typically, the scratch assay has been extensively used as a tool for studying cell migration under different experimental conditions (Figure 1). Moreover, this model is effective for the screening and identification of new drugs or active compounds through bioactivity-guided fractionation, and to determine the effective concentration 50 (EC50) [64]. Many studies did not report EC50 values; this value is important to evaluate the potency of new drugs for wound healing. The calculation of the EC50 value is useful for selecting compounds or plant extracts with wound healing activity.
Fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis are also two processes to study wound healing under in vitro conditions. Fibroblasts are one the most abundant cells in skin tissue and play an essential role in initiating the proliferative phase and subsequent tissue remodeling during wound recovery. During their proliferation, fibroblasts produce extracellular matrix proteins (fibronectin, hyaluronan, and proteoglycans) and collagen. Thus, decreased fibroblast proliferation could lead to delayed or chronic non-healing wounds [2]. Some plants, such as Arrabidaea chica (Bonpl.) B. Verl. (accepted name: Fridericia chica (Bonpl.) L.G. Lohmann) and Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir (Table 2) stimulate fibroblast proliferation, which could be a useful strategy for wound healing.
Table 2. In vitro wound healing promoting activity of single medicinal plants used in Latin America.
Table 2. In vitro wound healing promoting activity of single medicinal plants used in Latin America.
Botanical FamilyPlant NameSolvent/Plant Part/
Vehicle
Method/Cell Line/
Main Outcome/Wound Healing Activity, %
Reference
AmaranthaceaeIresine herbstii Hook.n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 34.33% (ethanolic extract) and 28.26% (hexanic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
AnacardiaceaeSchinus molle L.n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 76.22% (ethanolic extract) and 50.76% (hexanic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
AnnonaceaeAnnona crassiflora Mart.methanol-acetone-water (7:7:6 v/v/v), seedsScratch assay, HaCaT cells, 54% at 1.8 μg/mL and 73% at 3.6 μg/mL[65]
ApiaceaePetroselinum crispum (Mill.) FussMethanol, leavesScratch assay, A549 cells, 59.08% at 500 μg/mL[66]
ApocynaceaeHancornia speciosa Gomes96% ethanol, leavesScratch assay, primary human gingival fibroblasts, 42.8% at 25 μg/mL[67]
ArecaceaeAttalea speciosa Mart.Oil, fruit, DMSO (maximal final concentration of 0.5%)Scratch assay, L929 fibroblasts, concentration dependent manner 3.12–12.5 µg/mL (AUC)[68]
AsteraceaeAchyrocline satureioides (Lam.) DC.Ethanol, aerial partsMTT assay, HaCaT cells, stimulated keratinocyte proliferation at 1 μg/mL[69]
Bidens pilosa L.Ethanol and decoction, aerial partsMTT assay, HaCaT cells
No effect
[69]
Chaptalia nutans (L.) Pol.Ethanol and decoction, aerial partsMTT assay, HaCaT cells
No effect
[69]
Eupatorium laevigatum Lam.Ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 30.14% at 10 μg/mL[15]
Galinsoga parviflora Cav.n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 64.3% (hexanic extract) and 59.83% (ethanolic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
Pluchea sagittalis (Lam.) Cabreran-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 40.66% (hexanic extract) and 43.93% (ethanolic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
Wedelia trilobata (L.) Hitchc. (accepted name: Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski)95% ethanol, leaves defatted with hexane: ethyl acetate fraction from column chromatographyScratch assay, L929 fibroblasts, ethyl acetate fraction: 65.7% migration rate in day 1 and 70.5% closure in day 2 at 3 μg/mL[70]
Xanthium cavanillesii Schouw
(accepted name: Xanthium strumarium L.)
n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial partsScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 9.94% (hexanic extract) and 41.17% (ethanolic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
BignoniaceaeArrabidaea chica (Bonpl.) B. Verl.
(accepted name: Fridericia chica (Bonpl.) L.G. Lohmann)
Methanol/0.3% citric acid solution, leavesMTT assay, confluent primary human fibroblasts, growth stimulation (0.25–250 μg/mL). EC50 = 30 μg/mL[71]
BurseraceaeBursera morelensis RamirezHydro-distillation, essential oil, stems, DMEMScratch assay, human fibroblasts, ↑ cell migration at 0.01 mg/mL[48]
CactaceaePereskia aculeata Mill.95% (v/v) ethanol, leaves, DMEMScratch assay, L929 mouse fibroblast cells
No effect
[72]
CordiaceaeCordia americana (L.) Gottschling and J.S. Mill.Ethanol, Leaves (0.084 μg/mL of rosmarinic acid)Scratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 9.8% at 1 μg/mL[73]
CrassulaceaeSedum dendroideum DC.n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial partsScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 37.21% (ethanolic extract) and 27.86% (hexanic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
FabaceaeBauhinia ungulata L.Stem wood, extracted successively with hexane and ethanol. Liquid-liquid fractioning, ethyl acetate fractionScratch assay, A549 human epithelial cells, ↑ cell migration process and ↓ lesion area to approximately 32.6% and 22.0% at 10 and 100 μg/mL, respectively.[74]
Dipteryx alata Vogel95% ethanol, nuts, DMEM/F12 mediumScratch assay, A549 adenocarcinoma cell line, after 72 h 83% and 67% at 0.5 and 1mg/mL, respectively[75]
Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir.Water, bark, ethanol-precipitated compoundsMTT, WST, and BrdU incorporation assays, primary natural human fibroblasts (pNHDF), stimulated mitochondrial activity and proliferation at 10 μg/mL[76]
Parapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) BrenanEthanol, bark, fractionation of the extract afforded five known catechin derivatives, DMSOScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, ethanolic extract ~40% at 10 μg/mL[15]
Poincianella pluviosa (DC.) L.P. QueirozEthanol-water (1:1 v/v), bark, and fractionMTT and BrdU incorporation assays, HaCaT cells and human primary dermal fibroblasts (pNHDF). Stimulation of mitochondrial activity and ↑ keratinocyte proliferation[77]
HypericaceaeHypericum carinatum Griseb.n-hexane and cold acetone, aerial parts, phloroglucinol-enriched fractionsScratch assay, HaCaT cells, ↑ 138.7% cell proliferation at 15 μg/mL[78]
LoranthaceaeStruthanthus vulgaris (Vell.) Mart.Ethanol, leaves, defatted with hexaneScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 56.2% at 100 μg/mL[79]
LythraceaeLafoensia pacari A.St.-Hil.Hydroethanolic solution (1:10, w/v), leaves, DMEM mediumScratch assay, L929 cells, ↑ proliferation/migration of 23.1% and 35.3% at 0.1 and 0.03 μg/mL, respectively[80]
MalvaceaeWaltheria douradinha A. St.-Hil.
(syn. Waltheria communis A. St.-Hil.)
n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, 79.70% (hexanic extract) and 54.73% (ethanolic extract) at 10 μg/mL[15]
MoraceaeSorocea houlletiana Gaudich.
(accepted name: Sorocea guilleminiana Gaudich.)
Water, leaves, topical, 0.1% DMSO in DMEMScratch assay, N3T3 fibroblasts, ~90% proliferation/migration rate at 4 μg/mL[81]
MyrtaceaeEugenia dysenterica DC.Essential oil, hydro distillation, leavesScratch assay, L929 cells, 100% at 542.2 μg/mL[82]
Plinia peruviana (Poir.) Govaerts50% ethanol solution (v/v), fruit peelsScratch Assay, L929 cells
No effect
[83]
NyctaginaceaeMirabilis jalapa L.Ethanol and decoction, aerial partsMTT assay, HaCaT cells, stimulated keratinocyte proliferation at 25 μg/mL, both extracts[69]
OnagraceaeFuchsia magellanica Lam.50% (v/v) ethanol, leavesScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts (120.26%) and HaCaT keratinocytes (114.61%) at 2.5 µg/mL[84]
PetiveriaceaePetiveria alliacea L.n-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 albino mouse fibroblasts, ethanolic 10.26% at 10 μg/mL[15]
PiperaceaePiper regnellii (Miq.) C. DC.Ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, ethanolic 22.11% at 10 μg/mL[15]
PlantaginaceaePlantago australis Lam.Hydroethanolic solution (30% water and 70% ethanol), leavesScratch assay, HaCaT cells, 81.06% at 25 µg/mL[85]
ScrophulariaceaeBuddleja cordata Kunth(CH2Cl2-methanol) (1:1), Leaves, DMSO- DMEM-F12Scratch assay, fibroblasts FBH, 33.1% at 50 μg/mL[86]
SolanaceaeBrugmansia suaveolens (Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd.) Sweetn-hexane and ethanol, leaves, aerial parts, and flowersScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, hexanic: 26.66% and ethanolic: 9.83% at 10 μg/mL[15]
Solanum diploconos (Mart.) Bohs95% ethanol, fresh ripe fruit (peel and pulp with seeds), DMEMScratch assay, Murine L929 cells, ↑ fibroblast migration at 1, 10, or 100 μg/mL[87]
↑ and ↓ denotes an increase or decrease in mentioned variables, respectively; Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM).
In all, 39 studies were identified for in vivo wound healing activity of medicinal plants (Table 3). Five of the investigated plants (Mentzelia cordifolia, Muehlenbeckia tamnifolia, Mutisia acuminata, Spondias mombin, and Amphipterygium adstringens) showed no wound healing activity [88,89]. The leaves (49%), followed by fruit (15%), flowers (15%), and bark (10%), were the most investigated plant parts screened for in vivo wound healing activity. Ethanol was also the most reported solvent for performing wound healing assays (64%), followed by water (62%), methanol (20%), and others. Some of the studies employed two or more solvents for extraction. Since ethanol is the most widely used solvent for the extraction of bioactive compounds such as polyphenols [90], which have generated great interest in wound treatment, the frequent use of this solvent in these assays is not surprising [91]. Consequently, scientists often choose polar solvents, based on the nature of these types of bioactive compounds. The extraction of compounds with wound healing activity, such as terpenes, could be increased with the use of solvents such as dichloromethane. Seven studies have investigated the oral administration of medicinal plants (Pyrostegia venusta (Ker Gawl.) Miers, Plantago australis Lam., Persea americana Mill., Anacardium occidentale L., Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm., Chamaesyce hirta (L.) Millsp, and Cecropia peltata L.). Interestingly, neither species is related to oral use, based on ethnobotanical claims related to wounds.
Table 3. In vivo wound healing promoting activity of single medicinal plants used in Latin America.
Table 3. In vivo wound healing promoting activity of single medicinal plants used in Latin America.
Botanical FamilyPlant NameSolvent/Plant Part/
Administration/
Vehicle
Percentage of Wound Healing Activity (Model of Study)Reference
AnacardiaceaeAnacardium occidentale L.Unripe cashew, fruit pulp, oral, water (juice) 1:1Swiss mice pretreated daily for 14 days and post-surgery for 21 days, 86% at 0.2 mL on day 14 (excision wound)[92]
Amphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) Standl.Ethanol-water (70:30), stem bark, topical, propylene glycol:ethanol (90:10)Wistar rats for 15 days, at 10 mg/wound/day (excision wound)
no effect
[89]
Schinus terebinthifolia RaddiMethanol, leaves, topical, unbuffered physiological salineWistar rats for 11 days, 70.88% at 80 mg/mL (excision wound)[93]
Spondias mombin L.Fruit, decoction, topical, waterMice (Strain A) for 2 days, (wound-breaking strength) (incision wound)
no effect
[88]
AnnonaceaeAnnona squamosa L.70% ethanol, leaves, topicalNormal and STZ-induced diabetic Wistar rats for 16 days and 20, respectively; 85% of contraction normal rats at 100 mg/kg (excision wound). For 8 days, ↑ 89% in tensile strength in normal rats and 77% in diabetic rats at 100 mg/kg (incision wound)[21]
ApocynaceaeAllamanda cathartica L.Water, leaves, topicalSprague Dawley rats for 14 days, 91.12% at 150 mg/kg/day (excision wound). For 10 days, breaking strength 37.44% at 150 mg/kg/day (incision wound)[94]
Himatanthus drasticus (Mart.) PlumelLatex-water (1:1; v/v), topical, mineral oilSwiss mice for 14 days, 50 μL on days 3 (37.83%), 7 (69.24%) and 10 (81.56%) (excision wound)[95]
AsteraceaeAgeratina pichinchensis (Kunth) R.M. King and H. Rob.Water, aerial parts, topicalSprague-Dawley rats for 8 days, 60% at 16% (w/v) (incision wound)[35]
Bidens pilosa L.90% ethanol, leaves, topical, waterWistar rats for 9 days, 74.31% at 100 mg/mL (excision wound)[96]
Mutisia acuminata Ruiz and Pav.Pulverized stems and leaves, topical, waterMice (Strain A) for 2 days, (wound-breaking strength) (incision wound)
no effect
[88]
Vernonia scorpioides (Lam.) Pers.Ethanol,
flowers and leaves, liquid-liquid fractioning, ethyl acetate fraction
Wistar rats for 7 days, 39.8% at 5 mg/kg (excision wound infected with Staphylococcus aureus)[97]
BasellaceaeAnredera diffusa (Moq.) SperlingLeaves infusion, topical, waterMice (Strain A) for 2 days, 45.1% wound-
breaking strength at 200 mg/mL (incision wound)
[88]
BignoniaceaeArrabidaea chica (Bonpl.) B. Verl.
(accepted name: Fridericia chica (Bonpl.) L.G. Lohmann)
Methanol/0.3% citric acid solution, leaves, topical, saline 0.9%Wistar rats for 10 days, 96% at 100 mg/mL (excision wound)[71]
Pyrostegia venusta (Ker Gawl.) MiersMethanol, flowers, oral, DMSOWistar rats for 19 days, ~38% on 4th day and ~64% on 7th day at 100 mg/kg (excision wound). For 10 days, ↑ breaking strength at 100 mg/kg (incision wound)[98]
BrassicaceaeCoronopus didymus (L.) Sm.95% ethanol and aqueous, entire plant, oral, waterWistar rats, aqueous and ethanolic ~37% tensile strength at 200 mg/kg (incision wound)[99]
BurseraceaeBursera morelensis RamírezHydro-distillation, essential oil, stems, topical, cosmetic grade mineral oilCD-1 mice for 10 days, 67.2% at 10% (excision wound); 36% wound healing efficacy at 10% (incision wound)[48]
CactaceaeHylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britton and RoseWater, leaves, flowers, fruit pulp, topical, waterSTZ-induced diabetic Wistar rats for 7 days, 90% flowers extract at 0.5% (w/v); 73% leaves extract at 0.5% (w/v); 59% fruit pulp extract at 0.5% (w/v) on day 7 (excision wound). For 7 days, 81% flowers extract at 0.5% (w/v); 66% leaves extract at 0.5% (w/v); 52% fruit pulp extract at 0.5% (w/v) (incision wound; tensile strength)[100]
Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.Water (mucilage extract) and methanol, flowers, topical, methanol extract 10% in glycerolWistar rats for 13 days, >98% at 0.5 mg/mm2 mucilage extract and methanol extract (excision wound)[101]
CombretaceaeCombretum leprosum Mart.Ethanol/water solution (8:2 v/v), leaves, topical, saline.Swiss albino mice for 12 days, 86.88% at 100 μg/mL (excision wound)[102]
CucurbitaceaeCucurbita pepo L. var. BejaouiCold pressed oil, seeds, topicalWistar rats for 11 days, 91.6% on day 11 at 0.52 μL/mm2 (excision wound)[103]
EquisetaceaeChamaesyce hirta (L.) Millsp
previously known as Euphorbia hirta L.
95% Ethanol, whole plant, oralAlloxan induced diabetic Swiss rats for 16 days, wound contraction 35.92, 44.69 and 61.42% at 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg, respectively (excision wound)[104]
EuphorbiaceaeAcalypha langiana Müll. Arg.Water, leaves, topicalSTZ-induced diabetic rats for 7 days. ED50 = 0.27% (w/v) (excision wound), ED50 = 0.29% (incision wound), and >ED50 = 0.5% (w/v) (tensile strength).[105]
Croton lechleri Müll. Arg.Latex, alkaloid extraction, topical, PBSEvery 12 h for 2 days, 31% at 10% (wound-breaking strength)[106]
Jatropha curcas L.Latex, cortex, topical,Mice (Strain A) for 2 days, 31.1% wound-
breaking strength at 100 mg/mL (incision wound)
[88]
Jatropha neopauciflora PaxLatex, topicalCD-1 mice for 10 days. 100% at 50, 75, and 100% (w/v) (tensile strength)[107]
FabaceaeBowdichia virgilioides KunthWater, stem bark, topical, waterSwiss mice for 9 days, 62.5% on day 6 and 91% on day 9 at 10 mg/kg (w/v) (excision wound); for 9 days, 95.5% at 10 mg/kg (w/v) (excision wound infected with S. aureus)[108]
Caesalpinia ferrea Mart. ex Tul.Polysaccharide-rich extract, bark, topical, saline 0.9%Wistar rats for 21 days, 91.67% at 0.1% on day 10 (excision wound)[109]
Copaifera langsdorffii Desf.Oleoresin, bark, topical, 4% Tween 80 in normal salineWistar rats for 21 days, 84.05% at 4% on day 9 (excision wound) and for 12 days 99% at 4% on day 5 (incision wound; tensile strength)[110]
Copaifera paupera (Herzog) Dwyer
(syn. Copaifera langsdorffii Desf.)
Oleoresin (exudated from the trunk, topical, mineral oilAlloxan-induced diabetic Swiss Webster mice for 14 days, ~55–60% at 100, 150 or 200 mg/kg from day 7 (excision wound)[111]
LosaceaeMentzelia cordifolia Dombey ex Urb. and GilgCortex, decoction, topical, waterMice (Strain A) for 2 days, (wound-breaking strength) (incision wound)
no effect
[88]
LauraceaePersea americana Mill.Fruit, paste (extract), topical and oral (water)Sprague Dawley rats for 21 days, ~90% topical and oral at 300 mg/kg/day on day 13 (excision wound); For 10 days, ↑ wet and dry weight of the granulation tissue (dead space wound)[112]
MartyniaccaeMartynia annua L.Ethanol, defatted dried powdered, leaves, (methanol soluble fraction from chloroform insoluble fraction), topicalWistar rats for 20 days, 100% at 100% on day 18 (excision wound); for 9 days, ↑ tensile strength (incision wound)[113]
MeliaceaeCarapa guianensis Aubl.Ethanol, leaves, topical-petroleum jelly, oral-drinking waterSprague Dawley rats for 15 days, 100% at 250 mg/kg (excision wounds). for 10 days ~51.7% breaking strength at 250 mg/kg (incision wound); for 10 days ↑ wet and dry weight of the granulation tissue at 250 mg/kg (dead space wound)[114]
PiperaceaePeperomia galioides KunthPulverized stems and leaves, topical, waterMice (Strain A) for 2 days, 45.9% wound-breaking strength at a dose of 100 mg/mL (incision wound)[88]
PlantaginaceaePlantago australis Lam.Hydroethanolic solution (30% water and 70% ethanol), leaves, oral, salineWistar rats for 21 days, ~85–95% wound contraction at 500 and 1000 mg/kg, respectively on day 7 (excision wound)[85]
PolygonaceaeMuehlenbeckia tamnifolia (Kunth) Meisn.Cortex, decoction, topical, waterMice (Strain A) for 2 days, (wound-breaking strength) (incision wound)
no effect
[88]
SolanaceaeNicotiana tabacum L.Ethanol, Stems defatted previous, topicalWistar rats for 14 days, 98.7% at 2% (excision wound)[115]
UrticaceaeCecropia peltata L.Leaves, aqueous extract (topical and oral), ethanolic extract (topical), waterSprague Dawley rats for 10 days, aqueous extract 80.71% (topical) and 72.17% (oral) at 150 mg kg−1/day on day 11; ethanol extract 79.21% (topical) at 150 mg kg−1/day on day 11 (excision wound)[116]
VerbenaceaeLantana camara L.Ethanol, leaves, topicalSprague Dawley rats for 19 days until complete epithelialization, 98% on day 19 at 100 mg/kg daily (excision wound)[117]
↑ show an increase in the mentioned variables; Streptozotocin: (STZ).
In all, 45 studies were identified for in vivo wound healing activity of medicinal plant extracts, using different pharmaceutical formulations (Table 4). The leaves (50%) were also the most investigated plant parts, followed by fruit (9%), bark (7%), aerial parts (7%), roots (4%), and others. Petroleum jelly and gels were the main ingredients for preparing various formulations, and ethanol extracts, followed by methanol, were the most reported for performing wound healing assays. An important aspect to consider in pharmaceutical formulations is the assessment of their stability, manufacturing processes, and their biological effect in long-term studies. Many plant extracts can suffer degradation of their active compounds through time, and lose or decrease their pharmacological activity.
Excision and incision assays are employed to assess in vivo wound healing (Table 3 and Table 4). Some of these studies reported results using both methods. In four cases, wounds were infected with Staphylococcus aureus to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial activity and faster wound healing rate. Ten studies investigated the efficacy of wound healing-promoting activity in diabetic conditions by simulating the stages of the chronic healing process. Streptozotocin is used for inducing experimental diabetes in rodents. In addition, some medicinal plants, listed in Table 3 and Table 4, were screened for wound healing activity in combination with other in vitro activities, such as anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant effects. Duration of wound healing shows a high variation among studies, ranging from a minimum of 7 to a maximum of 21 days for the excision model and 2 to 30 days for the incision model. The wound repair process occurs in the following order: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling [2]. The effectiveness of wound healing can be highly dependent on the time and the treatment. The inflammatory phase is crucial in the wound healing process [3]; therefore, a prolonged inflammatory phase could contribute to chronic wound healing. Several in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that medicinal plants and isolated compounds can induce an early inflammation process, which accelerates wound healing [118]. Most of the studies reported wound contraction activity higher than 90% in the first days. For example, topical administration of F. chica leaves extract reduces the ulcer area after the 2nd day and healed wounds after 10 days (96%) of treatment in rats [71]; the aqueous extract from Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth stem barks induces wound contraction from day 6 and appears to heal wounds in 9 days (91%) in mice [108]. It is possible that these plant extracts induce an early peak of inflammation on day 1, or even earlier. Bardaa et al. [103] demonstrated that extracted oil from Cucurbita pepo L. seeds seems to accelerate the hemostasis phase in rats, and contraction was observed from day 3 to day 11 (91.6%) of the experiment. The polysaccharide-rich extract of Caesalpinia ferrea Mart. ex Tul. accelerates wound healing by changing the stage of inflammation via modulation of inflammatory mediators [109]. This is an important result, since the main goal in wound management is healing as soon as possible to prevent chronic wound healing. Therefore, in vivo experiments performed up to 11 days would be more relevant to assess the efficacy of wound healing, since wounds in rodents commonly heal between 7–14 days [119]. Particularly in rats, active contraction ceases after 12 days [120].
On the other hand, many studies using the incision wound model found that plant extracts improved wound healing activity by increased wound tensile strength, or breaking strength, suggesting an increase in collagen synthesis and the formation of stable molecular crosslinks to form fibers. In particular, the latex of Jatropha neopauciflora Pax and the oleoresin of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. are two promising exudates that increase wound tensile strength by 100% and 99%, respectively. Plants produce different types of exudates, including latexes and oleoresin with a protective capacity against herbivores and phytopathogens [121]. Latex and oleoresin were also two forms of application. This confirmed the potential as a new bioactive chemical resource, not only for wound healing, but also for antimicrobial activity in infected wounds.
Of the 84 reports investigating wound healing activity in vivo, (Table 1 and Table 2), there were a total of 8 irritation studies reported (9.5%). The remaining 76 studies did not report irritation in their results. The studies that reported 90% of wound contraction activity lacked an irritation assessment test as part of the toxicity test. Considering the potential hyper sensibility reaction associated with some plants [122], it is noteworthy to include irritability assays when screening for wound healing properties of medicinal plants and their derivatives. For example, the essential oil from Lippia sidoides Cham. (accepted name: Lippia origanoides Kunth), commonly found in the Northeast of Brazil, is traditionally used for treating wounds and superficial infections. However, de Oliveira et al. [123] revealed an irritant response to the skin when applied topically in high concentrations, without wound healing activity. Thus, even when no healing wound activity is found during preclinical studies of plants used in traditional medicine, the use of an irritability test can corroborate their safety. A topical application can reduce adverse reactions (e.g., systemic bleeding, duodenal ulcers, electrolyte imbalance, etc.) shown by oral administration. Topical application could reduce pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs.
Table 4. In vivo wound healing promoting activity of formulations based on Latin American medicinal plants.
Table 4. In vivo wound healing promoting activity of formulations based on Latin American medicinal plants.
Botanical FamilyPlant NameSolvent/Plant Part/
Administration/
Vehicle
Percentage of Wound Healing Activity (Model of Study)Reference
AmaranthaceaeAlternanthera brasiliana (L.) KuntzeMethanol, leaves, topical, petroleum jellyImmunocompromised Sprague Dawley rats for 7 days, 77.10% at 5% (w/w) on day 8 (excision wound)[124]
Methanol, leaves, topical, petroleum jellySTZ-induced diabetic Sprague Dawley rats for 7 days, 89.76% at 5% (w/w) on day 8 (excision wound)[125]
Chenopodium ambrosioides L.Ethanol, aerial parts, topical, ointment baseWistar rats for 19 days,
72.97% and 98.78%, at 5% on days 14 and 19, respectively (excision wound)
[126]
AnnonaceaeAnnona crassiflora Mart.Ethanol 98%, fruit peel, ethyl acetate and n-butanol fractions (1:1)- polyphenol-enriched fraction, topical, petroleum jelly/lanolin (7:3)C57BL/6 mice for 7 days, 32%, 38%, and 36% at 2%, 4% and 6%, respectively on day 4. 84% at 2% on day 7 (excision wound)[127]
Annona muricata L.Leaves, aqueous semisolid cream, topicalSprague Dawley rats for 15 days, 69%, and 77% wound closure at 5% and 10%, respectively (excision wound)[128]
AsteraceaeAchyrocline alata (Kunth) DC.Hydroethanolic solution 70%, flowers, topical, ointment base (lanolin and liquid paraffin)Swiss mice for 17 days, ~60% at 10% (w/w) from day 4 (excision wound)[129]
Flaveria trinervia (Spreng.) C. MohrMethanol, leaves, topical, aqueous base (polyethylene glycol and emulsifying wax)Albino mice for 34 days, 90% at 5% (w/w) on day 18 (excision wound)[130]
Neurolaena lobata (L.) Cass.Ethanol, leaves, topical, petroleum jellySprague Dawley rats for 13 days, 87% at 100 mg/kg/day (excision wound)[131]
Verbesina crocata (Cav.) Less.Methanol, aerial parts, topical, Vaseline®CD-1 mice for 14 days, ~33% at 5% w/w (incision wound; tensile strength)[132]
Vernonia scorpioides (Lam.) Pers.Ethanol 96%, leaves, topical, hydrogel Carbopol 2%,Guinea pigs (H–D) for 30 days, at 50% lacked effects on closure time, but stimulated the regeneration of the new tissue (excision wound)[133]
CactaceaePereskia aculeata Mill.Methanol and partition with hexane, leaves, topical, gel base: hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol 250 HHRs), sodium lauryl sulfate, alcohol, glycerin and methylparabenC57BL/6 mice for 14 days, 70% hexane fraction at 5% on day 5, 80% both hexane fraction and methanol fraction at 5% on day 7 (excision wound)[134]
CalophyllaceaeCalophyllum brasiliense Cambess.Ethanol:water (9:1), leaves, topical, non-ionic emulsion: 6% cetostearyl alcohol (w/w), 5% octyldodecanol (w/w), 7% mineral oil (w/w), 12% ethoxylated alcohol stearyl (w/w), 18% glycerin monoestarate (w/w), 10% propylene glycol (w/w), and purified waterWistar rats for 21 days, 90.67% at 10% (w/w) on day 14 (excision wound)[135]
CaryocaraceaeCaryocar coriaceum Wittm.Fixed oil from the seeds, topical, Vaseline® and lanolin (1:2)Swiss albino mice for 14 days, 96.54% at 12% (v/w) on day 7 (excision wound)[136]
CelastraceaeMaytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex ReissekEthanol 70%, leaves, topical, Vaseline® and lanolinBALB/c mice for 7 days, after 3 days, 20.8% at 4%; after 7 days 67.9% at 4% (excision wound)[137]
ConvolvulaceaeIpomoea batatas (L.) Lam.Tuber flour, topical, Beeler’s baseWistar rats for 10 days, 43% and 75% re-epithelialization process for 4 and 10 days, respectively, at 2.5% (excision wound)[138]
1.5 N hydrochloric acid and ethanol 96% (15:85, v/v), peels of the roots, topical, gel formulation: carbopol, liquid glycerin, propylene glycol, triethanolamine and waterBalb/c mice for 14 days, ~70% at 1% on day 6 (incision wound)[139]
EquisetaceaeChamaesyce hirta (L.) Millsp
(syn. Euphorbia hirta L.)
Ethanol 95%, whole plant, topical, hydrophobic ointment: povidone iodine/ethanolic extract of Euphorbia hirta whole plants. Petroleum jelly
Cetostearyl alcohl
PEG 6000
liquid paraffin
methyl paraben
Alloxan induced diabetic Swiss rats for 16 days, 32.86 and 36.32% at 5 and 10%, respectively, (excision wound)[104]
EuphorbiaceaeCroton zehntneri Pax and K. Hoffm.Essential oil, leaves, topical, Pluronic F-127 gels (10% w/w)Swiss mice for 15 days, 93% at 20% (excision wound)[140]
Jatropha curcas L.Methanol, leaves, topical, petroleum jellyWhite albino rats for 21 days, 100% at 15% w/w (excision wound)[141]
Jatropha gaumeri Greenm.Water, latex, topical, glycerin (cream)Balb/c mice for 20 days, 97.7% at 5% w/w (tensile strength)[142]
Pedilanthus tithymaloides (L.) Poit.Defatted
with petroleum ether and extracted with methanol, leaves, topical, ointment base:
wool fat 5 g, hard paraffin 5 g, cetostearyl alcohol 5 g, soft
white paraffin 85 g
Wistar rats for 18 days, 95.88% at 5% (excision wound), for 10 days 41.17% and 37.6% at 2.5% and 5%, respectively (incision wound; tensile strength); ↑ wet and dry weight of the granulation tissue (dead space wound)[143]
FabaceaeCopaifera langsdorffii Desf.Oleoresin and hydroalcoholic, leaves, topical, cream: aqueous phase composed of 75.8% water and 4.0% propylene glycol, and an organic phase contained 17% Lanette cream, 3% hard paraffin, and other components, pH = 6.86.Wistar rats for 14 days, 95.1% hydroalcoholic at 10% and 94.72% oleoresin at 10% on 14 day (excision wound)[144]
Dipteryx alata VogelBark extracted with ethanol, topical, creamC57BL/6 mice (excision wound) for 21 days, at 5%, 10%, and 15%
no effect
[145]
Mimosa pudica L.Distilled water, root, defatted by extracting with pet-ether followed by extraction of methanol, topical ointment
base B.P.
Wistar albino rats for 19 days, 87.71% on day 12 and 100% on day 16 at 2% (w/w) of methanolic extract (excision wound); for 10 days, ↑ tensile strength at 2% (w/w) (incision wound)[146]
Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC.Powder, leaves, topical, glycerinWistar rats for 21 days, 76% and 85% on day 14 and 21, respectively at 30% (w/w) (excision wound)[147]
Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) CovilleMe2CO-H2O (7:3), stem bark, redissolved in H2O and extracted with ethyl acetate (fraction), topical, ointment base (Beeler base)Wistar rats for 10 days, at 1% (excision wound)
no effect
[148]
LauraceaePersea americana Mill.Hexane, oil fruit, topical, semisolid formulation petroleum jellyWistar rats for 14 days, 100% at 50% on day 13 (excision wound); for 10 days, ~33% at 50% (incision wound; tensile strength)[149]
Methanol, seeds, topical, hydrogel: 1% Carbopol baseWistar albino rats for 20 days, 100% after 16 days at dose 5 and 10% (excision wound infected with S. aureus)[150]
LoganiaceaeStrychnos pseudoquina A. St.-Hil.Selective sequential extraction n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and ethanol/water (9:1, v/v), stem bark, topical hydroethanolic extract, lanolinSTZ-induced diabetic Wistar rats for 21 days,
90% and 89.9% on day 14 at 5% and 10%, respectively; 98.25% and 98.1% on day 21 at 5% and 10%, respectively; (excision wound)
[151]
Samples, ethanol 95%, topical, emulsified in lanolin at 5% and 10% (v/v)Wistar rats for 21 days, 52.4% and 58.5% on day 7 at 5% and 10%, respectively, (excision wound)[152]
LoranthaceaeStruthanthus vulgaris (Vell.) Mart.Ethanol, leaves, defatted with hexane, topical, lanolin: petrolatum (3:7)Wistar rats for 21 days, after 7 and 10 days 72% and 79% at 5%, respectively, (excision wound)[153]
LythraceaeLafoensia pacari A.St.-Hil.Hydroethanolic solution (1:10, w/v), leaves, topical, 2% propylene glycol and incorporated into Sepigel®Wistar rats for 24 days, 57.5% at 30 mg/g on day 6 (excision wound); for 9 days, ~42% at 100 mg/g (incision wound; tensile strength)[80]
MartyniaccaeMartynia annua L.Ethanol, defatted dried powdered, leaves, topical, ointment base B.P. (ointment)STZ-induced diabetic Wistar albino rats for 20 days, 100% methanol soluble fraction (from chloroform insoluble fraction) at 5% (w/w) on day 18 (excision wound)[154]
MoraceaeDorstenia drakena L.Water, rhizome, topical, petroleum jelly (ointment)Wistar rats for 30 days. 25% at 20% (w/w) (incision wound)[155]
Sorocea houlletiana Gaudich.
(accepted name: Sorocea guilleminiana Gaudich.)
Water, leaves, topical, 1% propylene glycol and incorporated into Polawax™ NF (12%) (from Croda International Plc, Goole, East Yorkshire, UK),
mineral oil (5%), propylene glycol (3%), volatile silicone (2%), EDTA (0.1%),
methylparaben (0.1%), and propylparaben (0.05%) in distilled water.
(cream)
Wistar rats for 23 days, 82.66% on day 7 and 90.08% on day 9 at 2 mg/g (excision wound); for 9 days at doses of 2 mg/g (45.73%) and 50 mg/g (35.27%) (incision wound; tensile strength)[81]
OrchidaceaeProsthechea michuacana (Lex.) W.E. HigginsHexane, bulbs, 2% (v/v) Tween-80 and simple ointment bases (ointment)Wistar albino rats for 18 days, 99.2% at 50% (v/v) on day 16 (excision wound); for 7 days, ↑ tensile strength at 50% (incision wound)[156]
PassifloraceaePassiflora edulis SimsEthanol/water (7:3), leaves, liquid/liquid partition (butanol fraction, 6.1% isorientin), topical, chitosan hydrogelAlloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rats for 14 days, 46.28% on day 2 and 96.26% on day 14 at 0.1% (w/v) (excision wound)[157]
PlantaginaceaePlantago australis Lam.70% ethanol and 30% water, leaves, topical, lanolin:Vaseline® (2:3).Wistar rats for 14 days, ~80% after 7 days at 4% (w/w) (excision wound)[158]
RubiaceaeHamelia patens Jacq.Ethanol, aerial parts, topical, petroleum jelly (ointment)Sprague-Dawley rats for 12 days, 16% (double incision; breaking strength) at 10% (w/w)[159]
SapindaceaeDodonaea viscosa Jacq.Ethanol, leaves, topical, petroleum jelly, lanoline, and paraffin (ointment)Balb/c mice for 7 days. ED50 = 5% (v/v) (tensile strength)[160]
SolanaceaeCapsicum annuum L.Methanol, fruit, topical, 1% Carbopol (gel)Wistar rats for 20 days, 100% on day 16 at 5% and 10% (excision wound infected with S. aureus)[161]
Physalis angulata L.70% methanol, leaves, topical, aqueous cream (British Pharmacopoeia)Wistar rats for 15 days, ~95% at 2.5, 5 and 10% from day 10 (excision wound)[162]
Solanum diploconos (Mart.) Bohs95% ethanol, fresh ripe fruit (peel and pulp with seeds), topical, semisolid formulation.Swiss mice for 7 days, reduction (~35%) at 1% on day 7 (excision wound)[87]
VernenaceaeLippia gracilis SchauerEssential oil, leaves, topical, 70% petroleum jelly and 30% anhydrous lanolinWistar rats for 21 days, ~72.5% at 10% from day 7 (excision wound)[163]
Lippia sidoides Cham. (accepted name: Lippia origanoides Kunth)Essential oil, topical, Vaseline® and
Lanolin (1:2)
Wistar rats for 21 days, at 6% and 12%
(v/w) (excision wound)
no effect
[123]
XimeniaceaeXimenia americana L.70% hydroalcoholic, bark and wood, topical, Lanette baseWistar rats for 14 days, 71% and 86.9% on day 7 and 14, respectively, at 10% (excision wound)[164]
↑ show increase in mentioned variables.
In many cases, phytochemical studies were carried out to identify the main components of the extracts using analytical techniques such as HPLC, HPLC-ESI-MS/MS, NMR, and GC-MS, which are currently used for chemical standardization of plant extracts. These techniques require specific knowledge of analytical methods and special training. Among the identified compounds, phenolic compounds such as chlorogenic acid, catechin, and quercetin derivatives, are the most reported. Five of these investigations have pursued the standardization of crude plant extracts. Considering that natural ingredients, including plant extracts, are becoming more popular in modern skin care formulations [165], appropriate standardization could improve efficiency and ensure their safety and quality control. It is known that, in some cases, chemical-standardized plant extracts displayed better activities than isolated compounds. This can be attributed to the synergistic effects among compounds, rather than one compound responsible for biological activity.
In all, 15 studies reported the isolation of bioactive compounds (Table 5). A total of 25 compounds, mostly belonging to the terpenoid and flavonoid classes, were isolated from 16 plants and investigated for wound healing activity, using various preclinical models (Table 5, Figure 2). Although it is sometimes difficult to investigate the effect of isolated compounds, due to the small quantities obtained, many of the isolated compounds reported here have been tested in rodent models. To perform and improve these experiments, the authors reported the use of the commercial form of some compounds, such as oleanolic acid (10) [44], trans-anethole (16) [140], and (+)-epi-α-bisabolol (21) [166]. The isolation of new compounds requires more time to elucidate the chemical structure; this is a challenge that faces many scientific groups. The molecular mechanisms of action underlying the wound healing effect of most of the isolated compounds listed in this review are yet to be clarified. However, some representative compounds generally displayed their wound healing activity by modulation of inflammatory mediators, migration and/or proliferation of fibroblasts, antioxidant effect, enhanced angiogenesis, and/or increased collagen deposition (Figure 1).
Table 5. Wound healing effect of bioactive compounds isolated from Latin American medicinal plants (structures illustrated in Figure 2).
Table 5. Wound healing effect of bioactive compounds isolated from Latin American medicinal plants (structures illustrated in Figure 2).
No.CompoundPlant SourceFormulation or
Vehicle
Percentage of Wound/
Healing Activity (Model of Study)
Reference
13α-hydroxymasticadienoic acidAmphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) Standl.Topical, propylene glycol:ethanol (90:10)Wistar rats for 15 days, ~80% on day 7 at 300 μg/wound/day (excision wound)[89]
2–6Anacardic acidsAmphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) Standl.Topical, propylene glycol:ethanol (90:10)Wistar rats for 15 days, ~80% on day 7 at 300 μg/wound/day (excision wound)[89]
7BornesitolHancornia speciosa GomesDMSO, 0.5%Scratch assay, primary human gingival fibroblasts, 80.8% at 50 μM (9.71 μg/mL)[67]
8Quinic acidHancornia speciosa GomesDMSO, 0.5%Scratch assay, primary human gingival fibroblasts, 69.1% at 50 μM (9.61 μg/mL)[67]
9RutinHancornia speciosa GomesDMSO, 0.5%Scratch assay, primary human gingival fibroblasts, 39.6% at 50 μM (30.53 μg/mL)[67]
10Oleanolic acidAnredera diffusa (Moq.) SperlingTopical, DMSOMice (strain A) for 2 days, 42.9% at 12.5 mg/mL (incision wound; tensile strength)[44]
113β, 6β, 16β-trihydroxylup-20(29)-eneCombretum leprosum Mart.Topical, salineSwiss albino mice for 12 days, 99.65% at 100 μg/mL (excision wound)[102]
12KaempferolIpomoea carnea Jacq.TopicalWistar rats for 14 days, 91.1% at 200 mg/kg body weight/day (excision wound) 22.6% at 200 mg/kg body weight/day (incision wound; breaking strength)[167]
13Kaempferol 3-O-α-D-glucosideIpomoea carnea Jacq.TopicalWistar rats for 14 days, 90.2% at 200 mg/kg body weight/day (excision wound); 38.3% at 200 mg/kg body weight/day (incision wound; breaking strength)[167]
14Rosmarinic acidCordia americana (L.) Gottschling and J.S. Mill.DMSO, 0.5%Scratch assay, Swiss 3T3 albino mouse fibroblasts cells, 11.8% at 10 μg/mL[73]
15Taspine hydrochlorideCroton lechleri Müll. Arg.Topical, PBSMice (strain A) every 12 h for 2 days, wound-breaking strength, 58.2% at a dose of 0.1 mg/mL (incision wound) ED50 = 0.375 mg/kg[106]
PBSScratch assay, human foreskin fibroblast, 27 ± 1.83 no. cells/cm at 2 ng/mL[106]
16Trans-anetholeCroton zehntneri Pax and K. Hoffm.Topical, Pluronic F-127 gels (10% w/w)Swiss mice for 15 days, 90% at a dose of 20% (excision wound)[140]
171,2 tetradecanediol, 1-(hydrogen sulfate), sodium salPedilanthus tithymaloides (L.) Poit.Topical, ointment base:
wool fat 5 g, hard paraffin 5 g, cetostearyl alcohol 5 g, soft
white paraffin 85 g
Wistar rats for 18 days, 100% at a dose of 0.25% w/w (excision wound); for 10 days 50.8% at 0.25% w/w (incision wound; breaking strength)[143]
182-(3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-chromen-4-onePedilanthus tithymaloides (L.) Poit.Topical, ointment base:
wool fat 5 g, hard paraffin 5 g, cetostearyl alcohol 5 g, soft
white paraffin 85 g
Wistar rats for 18 days, 100% at a dose of 0.25% w/w (excision wound); for 10 days 51.8% at 0.25% w/w (incision wound; breaking strength)[143]
Martynia annua L.Topical, ointment base B.P. (ointment)STZ-induced diabetic Wistar albino rats for 20 days, 87.67% at 0.5% w/w on day 18 (excision wound)[154]
19Epicatechin-3-O-gallateParapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) BrenanDMSOScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 albino mouse fibroblasts, ~58% increased cell numbers at 1 μM[168]
204′-O-methylepicatechin-3-O-gallateParapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) BrenanDMSOScratch assay, Swiss 3T3 albino mouse fibroblasts, ~60% increased cell numbers at 1 μM[168]
21(+)-epi-α-bisabolol
Some authors referred (+)-anymol
Peperomia galioides KunthTopicalMice (strain A) every 12 h for 2 days, wound-breaking strength, 62% using 4 mg per mouse (incision wound), ED50 = 155 μg/g[166]
22VerbascosidePlantago australis Lam.DMSOScratch assay, HaCaT cells, 58.7% and 57.77% at 5 and 10 µg/mL, respectively[85]
23N-Methyl-(2S,4R)-trans-
4-Hydroxy-L-Proline
Sideroxylon obtusifolium (Humb. ex Roem. and Schult.) T.D. Penn.Topical, 1% carboxyvinyl polymer, 5% glycerin, and 1% polypropy- lene glycol. Methylparaben (0.15%) and propilparaben (0.05%) (gel)Swiss mice for 12 days, reductions around 58% at 3% and 10% (excision wound)[169]
243-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-glucopyranosyl- (1→3)-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-D-fucopyranosyl- 23,28-dihydroxyoleane-11,13(18)-dieneBuddleja scordioides KunthTopical, waterSTZ-induced diabetic Wistar rats for 7 days, 70% compound 1 at 0.5% (excision wound), 75% compound 1 at 0.5% (incision wound)[170]
253-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-D-fucopyranosyl-16,23,28-trihydroxyoleane-11,13(18)-dieneBuddleja scordioides KunthTopical, waterSTZ-induced diabetic Wistar rats for 7 days, 81% compound 2 at 0.5% (excision wound), 85% compound 2 at 0.5%, (incision wound)[170]

2.3. Clinical Wound Healing Research

Despite some promising preclinical results, clinical research aiming to study the wound healing activity of Latin American plants is still limited, and only seven clinical trials were found in the search (Table 6), mostly double-blind randomized controlled trials. Only one study [171] was carried out in a long-term period (1 year). Clinical assays should also consider chronic wounds, which affect the patient’s quality of life. The treatment of chronic wounds is expensive, and ineffective in some cases, and some drugs can induce side effects that may lead to many patients abandoning their treatment [172]. All studies are phase 1 and include a low number of participants (<100). Clinical studies are expensive, but it is necessary to continue the evaluation of plant extracts cited in the table in phase 2 and 3 assays.
We noted that three studies employed extracts for chronic venous leg ulcers, and involved less than 50 subjects. Among these, Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir. reduces ulcer size by 93% after the 8th treatment week [173]. Individuals living with venous leg ulcers suffer from symptoms such as pain, odor, exudate, and swelling, combined with restricted mobility, resulting from compression therapy that negatively affects their quality of life [174]. Medicinal plants are promising options for treating venous ulcers [175]. Thus, this is a potential field to evaluate the effect of those plants with important wound healing activity. It is crucial to note that all the plant species used in the clinical trials listed in Table 6 have reported traditional use related to wound healing. These features emphasize the importance of how ethnomedical information provides significant advantages for identifying which plants are most likely to be useful in clinical trials.
Table 6. Clinical trials with plants presenting wound healing activity.
Table 6. Clinical trials with plants presenting wound healing activity.
Plant NameSolvent/Plant Part/
Administration/
Vehicle
Study DesignDose, Duration, and Patient TypeMain
Outcome
Adverse EffectReference
Ageratina pichinchensis (Kunth) R.M. King and H. Rob.Hexane-ethyl acetate extract, aerial parts, topical, carboxymethyl cellulose (AKUCELL 2201)Double-blind, prospective, and randomized study
-
Standardized extract (0.76% encecalin)
-
1-year
-
Patients with chronic venous leg ulcers (n = 17)
Ulcer size reduction 79.1% in the second treatment month. Heal completely 8 monthsTolerability[171]
Hexane-ethyl acetate extract, aerial parts, topical, cold creamRandomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study
-
Standardized extract [in 7-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)-galactin content] 5%
-
24 weeks
-
Patients with diabetic foot ulcer (n = 18)
At week 8 90.78% wound size reductionNo adverse effects[176]
Croton lechleri Müll. Arg.80% ethanol, bark latex, topical, 10% cetyl alcohol, 7% isopropylmeristat, and 21% Vaseline (cream base); span 20 and tween 80 (emulsifying agent) parabens (preservative); and propylene glycol (humectant)Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized
-
15% ethanolic extract
-
20 days
-
Patients referred for skin tag removal (n = 60)
At day 14 95.73% of wound healingNot mentioned[177]
Rhizophora mangle L.Aqueous extract, barkSingle blind, randomized and comparative with an antiseptic
-
Tannin content higher than 12 mg/mL (condensed tannins 80% and hydrolysable tannins 20%)
-
6 weeks
-
Patients with open wounds from surgical intervention of pilonidal cyst or fistula (n = 12)
At day 30, 32% of wound healingNo adverse effects[178]
Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir.Ethanol, cortex, topical, each 100 g of the hydrogel had Carbopol 940 (0.75 g), triethanolamine (0.85 g), M. tenuiflora extract (5 g), ethanol (10 g), propylene glycol (16.5 g), methylparaben (0.05 g) and vehicle (100 g).Randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind
-
Standardized hydrogel with 10 mg/g of mimonoside A and 0.5 mg/g of mimonoside B
-
8 weeks
-
Patients with venous leg ulcers (n = 22)
No effectPain and burning in four patients[179]
Ethanol, Bark, topical, polyethylene glycol (PEG-200) and incorporated into Carbopol® 940Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
-
Standardized in its polyphenolic content (1.8 g tannins/100 g hydrogel)
-
12 weeks
-
Patients with venous leg ulcers (n = 20)
93% ulcer-size reduction at the 8th treatment weekNo adverse effects[173]
Achillea millefolium L.90% ethanol, topical, VaselineDouble-blind clinical trial study
-
5%
-
14 days
-
Episiotomy wound healing in primiparous women (n = 32)
Reduce perineal pain level, redness, edema, and ecchymosisNot mentioned[180]

2.4. Mechanism of Action

The molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of some of the plants listed here are associated with different stages of the wound healing process. The common wound healing mechanism of action involves the modulation of inflammatory mediators (i.e., TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6), either by inducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the early wound healing process, or by reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines after 48 h. Simultaneously, the accumulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors (i.e., IL-10 and TGF-β) contribute to successful wound closure.
TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, are closely involved in the early wound healing process [181,182], with a gradual decline thereafter. A subtle balance of these pro-inflammatory cytokines is crucial for coordinating cellular processes during wound healing, since overexpression, or a very low reduction, can generate an unfavorable environment and alter the outcome of wound repair. For example, a persistently high level of TNF-α is associated with impaired healing leading to a decrease in collagen production, while regulated production of IL-6 can induce collagen deposition in wound sites [182].
The oral administration of 100 mg/kg methanolic extract of Pyrostegia venusta flowers increased the levels of IL-10, with the subsequent decrease in the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 after 48 h of treatment in Wistar rats, with excision wound, without affecting collagen formation and hydroxyproline production [98]. IL-10 can limit tissue damage caused by inflammation by decreasing the levels of pro-inflammatory mediators and providing protection against further tissue damage, which helps wound closure, with less scar formation [1,3].
In alloxan-diabetic mice, the topical treatment with 200 mg/kg oleoresin from Copaifera paupera decreased the TNF-α levels and increased the levels of IL-10 after 7 days of treatment, whereas the levels of MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) were decreased after 10 days of treatment [111]. A study indicated that low expression of MCP-1 in db/db mice liver could explain the constant infections under diabetic conditions, and the same study suggested that using MCP-1 in the early stages could promote the healing of diabetic wounds [183].
On the other hand, topical application of formulations containing 10% oleoresin and 10% hydroalcoholic extract of leaves from C. langsdorffii reduced the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels, and increased the IL-10 levels after 3 days in skin biopsies [144]. In addition to IL-10, C. langsdorffii increased the FGF-2 and TGF-β (growth factors) gene expression, which are closely involved in granulation tissue formation, re-epithelialization, matrix formation, and remodeling. The wound healing effect of Strychnos pseudoquina A. St.-Hil. is also associated with the increase of IL-10 and TGF-β levels, as well as cellularity stimulation, collagen, elastic fibers deposition, and attenuation of oxidative damage in scar tissue [151,152].
Another important mechanism proposed for the wound healing activity of C. langsdorffii is the regulation of MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression: two matrix metalloproteinases that contribute to the advancement of the proliferative stage, including migration of fibroblasts and keratinocytes, angiogenesis, and re-epithelialization. These observations suggest the influence of C. langsdorffii creams stimulating the wound re-epithelialization mechanism [144]. Similarly, de Moura et al. [137] demonstrated that topical treatment with the hydroalcoholic extract of Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex Reissek leaves contributes to the advancement of the proliferative stage, probably by increasing the activity of MMP-9.
Nitric oxide (NO) also plays a central role in the regulation of homeostasis, inflammation, and antimicrobial action, in the wound healing process. NO is produced at higher levels by iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase) during the inflammatory phase, and modulation of this production has been seen as an attractive solution to impaired wound healing [184]. The wound healing effect of the three plants listed here is associated with NO regulation.
The reduction of TNF-α and IL-1β levels, and MPO (myeloperoxidase activity) accompanying the up-regulation of TGF-β, iNOS, and NO production, was observed in the first days after wound induction in rat topical treatment with polysaccharide-rich extract of Caesalpinia ferrea stem barks [109]. The authors suggested that the reduced polymorphonuclear influx and expression/levels of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), paralleled with the increased levels of antinociceptive mediators (iNOS, NO) in the first days after the wound induction, make the polysaccharide-rich extract of C. ferrea stem barks an ideal candidate for the treatment of inflammatory and painful cutaneous wounds.
Topical application of a gel containing 10% N-Methyl-(2S,4R)-trans-4-Hydroxy-L-Proline (23), an L-proline derivative isolated from Sideroxylon obtusifolium (Humb. ex Roem. and Schult.) T.D. Penn. leaves, improves the wound healing process by upregulating iNOS and COX-2 (cyclooxygenase-2) activities in the second day after wound induction [169]. Interestingly, other proline derivatives are present in plant extracts with anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects [185,186]. Due to the close relationship in the L-proline derivatives structures, (23) could be effective in pain management and wound care.
Although NO is produced at higher levels by iNOS during the inflammatory phase [184], the role of this molecule in wound healing could be controversial, according to other studies. For example, topical administration of 5% Struthanthus vulgaris (Vell.) Mart. ointment reduces NO production in the early stages of healing, as well as altering the release of TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-10, and TGF-β [153]. Looking forward, future research on the wound healing effect of medicinal plants should also focus on NO production, and its related biochemical mechanisms, since the exact mechanisms of action are poorly understood.
Another component of cell signaling involved in wound healing is the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, particularly extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 and p38 MAPK. Both ERK1/2 and p38 are activated by tissue wounding facilitating wound closure. ERK 1/2 pathway activation is associated with the mediation of proliferation, differentiation, and migration, of various cell types [187]. The hydroethanolic leaf extract of Lafoensia pacari A.St.-Hil. increases the p-ERK1/2 expression in L929 fibroblasts. The specific mechanism of the hydroethanolic leaf extract of L. pacari bioactivity is not completely characterized, but the experimental model used in this work allowed the authors to suggest that this plant might exert cell proliferation during wound healing [80].

2.5. Future Considerations

Limited irritability studies are currently available, suggesting that detailed toxicity assays are still required for different medicinal plant extracts, especially for those with significant wound healing activity. Several compounds (i.e., 2-(3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-chromen-4-one, 1,2 tetradecanediol, Kaempferol 3-O-α-D-glucoside, and others) showed wound healing activity that could be considered for candidates in clinical trials. Special attention should be given to plant extracts such as Croton lechleri, Ageratina pichinchensis, and others, which showed wound healing activity without adverse reactions in clinical trials. All plants reported with clinical wound healing activity have an ethnomedicinal use related to healing wounds. Thus, traditional knowledge is a useful tool to obtain plants as candidates for clinical evaluation.
Latin American countries face economic and health problems due to the high prevalence of diabetes, and the elderly population is expected to increase in the next two decades [188]. The wound healing activity of plant extracts and compounds should also be evaluated in diabetes-induced in vivo models, where a risk of infection can occur. Access to primary healthcare systems is difficult in this region; therefore, people living in rural areas still depend on traditional medicine. Plants with wound healing activity evaluated in clinical trials could be incorporated into national health systems, as an alternative therapy, in case of lacking allopathic medicine in rural areas.

3. Materials and Methods

An electronic database search was conducted using ScienceDirect, PubMed, SciFinder, SciELO, and Google Scholar from January to June 2022. The search included the following keywords: “American”, “Latin American”, “medicinal plants”, “wound healing”, “ethnopharmacological”, “ethnomedicinal”, and “ethnobotanical”. Ethnobotanical information from books was also considered for this review. Only scientific articles published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese, were contemplated. In ethnobotanical studies, only information presenting complete data on the way of preparation, route of administration, plant part used, and the scientific name of the plant species was considered. Only preclinical and clinical studies regarding the single use of a medicinal plant were considered. The study design, dose, duration, patient type, the main outcome, and adverse effects of the herbal treatment, were collected from clinical trials. Scientific works without information on the percentage of wound contraction, tensile strength, or breaking strength, were excluded. In some cases, percentages of wound healing activity were calculated from the information presented in the scientific article. No pharmaceutical formulations based on nanotechnology were contemplated. For each species, the accepted botanical names were validated and updated, if necessary, by consulting the Missouri Botanical Garden (http://tropicos.org/, accessed on 12 May 2022). The chemical structures were drawn using the ChemDraw Ultra 12.0 software.

4. Conclusions

In Latin America, there is extensive folk knowledge of medicinal plants for wound healing. This practice is important for primary health care, especially in rural areas. Medicinal plants from Latin America are a source of compounds with wound healing activity. A few plant species (22%) have been scientifically validated to support ethnomedical use, and demonstrate their efficacy. Since 65% of medicinal plants with empirical wound healing activity are yet to be studied, extensive work is necessary for a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the wound healing effects of medicinal plants in Latin America.
Only two formulations containing plant extracts were evaluated for wound healing activity in clinical trials. The pharmaceutical formulation requires the evaluation of their manufacture and stability, for assessing their efficacy in clinical trials.
Several reports have described the wound healing potential of plant extracts, or their isolated compounds, but their mechanism of action are yet to be explained. The mechanism of action could help to prepare combinations of compounds with different mechanisms of action for inducing synergistic actions. It is necessary to carry out phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in long-term studies, to evaluate the wound healing activity of plant extracts (e.g., Croton lechleri and Ageratina pichinchensis).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J.A.-C.; investigation, A.S.-G. and A.J.A.-C.; writing-original draft preparation, A.S.-G. and A.J.A.-C.; writing-review and editing, A.S.-G. and A.J.A.-C.; supervision, A.J.A.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Directorate for Research and Postgraduate Support (DAIP) at the University of Guanajuato (DAIP, CIIC 141/2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schreml, S.; Szeimies, R.-M.; Prantl, L.; Landthaler, M.; Babilas, P. Wound Healing in the 21st Century. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2010, 63, 866–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Enoch, S.; Leaper, D.J. Basic Science of Wound Healing. Surgery 2008, 26, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rodrigues, M.; Kosaric, N.; Bonham, C.A.; Gurtner, G.C. Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 665–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Montenegro, R.A.; Stephens, C. Indigenous Health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet 2006, 367, 1859–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Del Carmen Juárez-Vázquez, M.; Carranza-Álvarez, C.; Alonso-Castro, A.J.; González-Alcaraz, V.F.; Bravo-Acevedo, E.; Chamarro-Tinajero, F.J.; Solano, E. Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used in Xalpatlahuac, Guerrero, México. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 148, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Süntar, I. Importance of Ethnopharmacological Studies in Drug Discovery: Role of Medicinal Plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Parmar, V.S.; Jain, S.C.; Bisht, K.S.; Jain, R.; Taneja, P.; Jha, A.; Tyagi, O.D.; Prasad, A.K.; Wengel, J.; Olsen, C.E. Phytochemistry of the Genus Piper. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 597–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alonso-Castro, A.J.; Maldonado-Miranda, J.J.; Zarate-Martinez, A.; del Rosario Jacobo-Salcedo, M.; Fernández-Galicia, C.; Figueroa-Zuñiga, L.A.; Rios-Reyes, N.A.; de León-Rubio, M.A.; Medellín-Castillo, N.A.; Reyes-Munguia, A. Medicinal Plants Used in the Huasteca Potosina, Mexico. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 143, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scarpa, G.F. Medicinal Plants Used by the Criollos of Northwestern Argentine Chaco. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 91, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tribess, B.; Pintarelli, G.M.; Bini, L.A.; Camargo, A.; Funez, L.A.; de Gasper, A.L.; Zeni, A.L.B. Ethnobotanical Study of Plants Used for Therapeutic Purposes in the Atlantic Forest Region, Southern Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 164, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Magalhães, P.K.A.; Araujo, E.N.; Santos, A.M.; Vanderlei, M.B.; Souza, C.C.L.; Correia, M.S.; Fonseca, S.A.; Pavão, J.; Souza, M.A.; Costa, J.G. Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Study of Medicinal Plants Used by a Traditional Community in Brazil’s Northeastern. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Monigatti, M.; Bussmann, R.W.; Weckerle, C.S. Medicinal Plant Use in Two Andean Communities Located at Different Altitudes in the Bolívar Province, Peru. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Da Costa, I.B.C.; Bonfim, F.P.G.; Pasa, M.C.; Montero, D.A. Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Flora in the Rural Community Rio Dos Couros, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Bol. Latinoam. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromat. 2017, 16, 53–67. [Google Scholar]
  14. Scarpa, G.F.; Rosso, C.N. Etnobotánica Histórica de Grupos Criollos de Argentina IV: Identificación Taxonómica de Las Plantas y Análisis de Datos Medicinales Del Chaco Húmedo Provenientes de La Encuesta Nacional de Folklore de 1921. Bonplandia 2019, 28, 5–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schmidt, C.; Fronza, M.; Goettert, M.; Geller, F.; Luik, S.; Flores, E.M.M.; Bittencourt, C.F.; Zanetti, G.D.; Heinzmann, B.M.; Laufer, S. Biological Studies on Brazilian Plants Used in Wound Healing. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 122, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De O Mesquita, U.; Tavares-Martins, A.C.C. Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants in the Community of Caruaru, Mosqueiro Island, Belem-PA, Brazil. Bol. Latinoam. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromat. 2018, 17, 130–159. [Google Scholar]
  17. Canales, M.; Hernández, T.; Caballero, J.; De Vivar, A.R.; Avila, G.; Duran, A.; Lira, R. Informant Consensus Factor and Antibacterial Activity of the Medicinal Plants Used by the People of San Rafael Coxcatlán, Puebla, México. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. De Albuquerque, U.P.; Monteiro, J.M.; Ramos, M.A.; de Amorim, E.L.C. Medicinal and Magic Plants from a Public Market in Northeastern Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 110, 76–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Di Stasi, L.C.; Oliveira, G.P.; Carvalhaes, M.A.; Queiroz-Junior, M.; Tien, O.S.; Kakinami, S.H.; Reis, M.S. Medicinal Plants Popularly Used in the Brazilian Tropical Atlantic Forest. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carhuanca, K.M.; Salgado, E.L.R. Plantas Medicinales de Uso Popular en la Amazonía Peruana; Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation: Madrid, Spain, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ponrasu, T.; Suguna, L. Efficacy of Annona squamosa on Wound Healing in Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Rats. Int. Wound J. 2012, 9, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Medrano-Guerrero, A.; Carranza, E.; Juárez-Vázquez, M.C.; Solano, E.; Ruiz-Padilla, A.J.; Ruiz-Noa, Y.; Deveze-Alvarez, M.A.; Brennan-Bourdon, L.M.; Alonso-Castro, A.J. Medicinal Plants Used in Rural Communities from the Municipality of Dolores Hidalgo, Guanajuato, Mexico. Bol. Latinoam. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromat. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0124-00642021000400204 (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  23. Tene, V.; Malagon, O.; Finzi, P.V.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C.; Zaragoza, T. An Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in Loja and Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De-la-Cruz, H.; Vilcapoma, G.; Zevallos, P.A. Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants Used by the Andean People of Canta, Lima, Peru. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Edelmira, L.M.; Beatriz, F.P.; Robert, B. Selección de Plantas Medicinales de México; Editorial Limusa: Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  26. Estrada-Castillón, E.; Villarreal-Quintanilla, J.Á.; Rodríguez-Salinas, M.M.; Encinas-Domínguez, J.A.; González-Rodríguez, H.; Figueroa, G.R.; Arévalo, J.R. Ethnobotanical Survey of Useful Species in Bustamante, Nuevo León, Mexico. Hum. Ecol. 2018, 46, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hirschmann, G.S.; de Arias, A.R. A Survey of Medicinal Plants of Minas Gerais, Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1990, 29, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pedrollo, C.T.; Kinupp, V.F.; Shepard, G., Jr.; Heinrich, M. Medicinal Plants at Rio Jauaperi, Brazilian Amazon: Ethnobotanical Survey and Environmental Conservation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 186, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bourdy, G.; DeWalt, S.J.; De Michel, L.R.C.; Roca, A.; Deharo, E.; Muñoz, V.; Balderrama, L.; Quenevo, C.; Gimenez, A. Medicinal Plants Uses of the Tacana, an Amazonian Bolivian Ethnic Group. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 70, 87–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Odonne, G.; Valadeau, C.; Alban-Castillo, J.; Stien, D.; Sauvain, M.; Bourdy, G. Medical Ethnobotany of the Chayahuita of the Paranapura Basin (Peruvian Amazon). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 146, 127–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Giovannini, P. Medicinal Plants of the Achuar (Jivaro) of Amazonian Ecuador: Ethnobotanical Survey and Comparison with Other Amazonian Pharmacopoeias. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 164, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Polesna, L.; Polesny, Z.; Clavo, M.Z.; Hansson, A.; Kokoska, L. Ethnopharmacological Inventory of Plants Used in Coronel Portillo Province of Ucayali Department, Peru. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scarpa, G.F. Etnobotánica Médica de Los Indígenas Chorote y Su Comparación Con La de Los Criollos Del Chaco Semiárido (Argentina). Darwiniana Nueva Ser. 2009, 47, 92–101. [Google Scholar]
  34. Martínez, M. Las Plantas Medicinales de Mexico. Ediciones Botas. Mex. DF 1989, 656. Available online: https://books.google.com.cu/books/about/Las_plantas_medicinales_de_M%C3%A9xico.html?id=811gAAAAMAAJ (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  35. Romero-Cerecero, O.; Zamilpa-Álvarez, A.; Ramos-Mora, A.; Alonso-Cortés, D.; Jiménez-Ferrer, J.E.; Huerta-Reyes, M.E.; Tortoriello, J. Effect on the Wound Healing Process and in vitro Cell Proliferation by the Medicinal Mexican Plant Ageratina pichinchensis. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 979–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andrade-Cetto, A. Ethnobotanical Study of the Medicinal Plants from Tlanchinol, Hidalgo, México. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 122, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ocampo, R.; Balick, M.J. Plants of Semillas Sagradas: An Ethnomedicinal Garden in Costa Rica; Finca Luna Nueva Lodge: Peñas Blancas La Fortuna, Costa Rica, 2009; ISBN 0615274153. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hammond, G.B.; Fernández, I.D.; Villegas, L.F.; Vaisberg, A.J. A Survey of Traditional Medicinal Plants from the Callejón de Huaylas, Department of Ancash, Perú. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1998, 61, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. García-Regalado, G. Plantas Medicinales de Aguascalientes, 1st ed.; García-Regalado, G., Ed.; Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes: Aguascalientes, México, 2014; ISBN 978-607-8359-83-7. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lara Reimers, E.A.; Lara Reimers, D.J.; Chaloupkova, P.; del Valle, J.M.Z.; Milella, L.; Russo, D. An Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in Papantla, Veracruz, Mexico. Plants 2019, 8, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sánchez, M.P.O. Plantas Medicinales Del Estado de Chihuahua; UACJ: Chiyoda City, Japan, 1999; Volume 1, ISBN 9687485825. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nava, R.F.; Zamora, D.R.; González, E.C. Notas Sobre Plantas Medicinales Del Estado de Querétaro, México. Polibotánica 2001, 12, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  43. De Feo, V.; Soria, R.M.U. Medicinal Plants and Phytotherapy in Traditional Medicine of Paruro Province, Cusco Department, Peru. Pharmacol. Online 2012, 1, 154–219. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moura-Letts, G.; Villegas, L.F.; Marçalo, A.; Vaisberg, A.J.; Hammond, G.B. In vivo Wound-Healing Activity of Oleanolic Acid Derived from the Acid Hydrolysis of Anredera diffusa. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 978–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Godínez-Caraballo, D.; Volpato, G. Plantas Medicinales Que Se Venden En El Mercado El Río, Camagüey, Cuba. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2008, 79, 217–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hilgert, N.I. Plants Used in Home Medicine in the Zenta River Basin, Northwest Argentina. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 76, 11–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hajdu, Z.; Hohmann, J. An Ethnopharmacological Survey of the Traditional Medicine Utilized in the Community of Porvenir, Bajo Paraguá Indian Reservation, Bolivia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 139, 838–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Salas-Oropeza, J.; Jimenez-Estrada, M.; Perez-Torres, A.; Castell-Rodriguez, A.E.; Becerril-Millan, R.; Rodriguez-Monroy, M.A.; Canales-Martinez, M.M. Wound Healing Activity of the Essential Oil of Bursera morelensis, in Mice. Molecules 2020, 25, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bueno, N.R.; Castilho, R.O.; da Costa, R.B.; Pott, A.; Pott, V.J.; Scheidt, G.N.; da Silva Batista, M. Medicinal Plants Used by the Kaiowá and Guarani Indigenous Populations in the Caarapó Reserve, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2005, 19, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bitu, V.D.C.N.; Bitu, V.D.C.N.; Matias, E.F.F.; de Lima, W.P.; da Costa Portelo, A.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; de Menezes, I.R.A. Ethnopharmacological Study of Plants Sold for Therapeutic Purposes in Public Markets in Northeast Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 172, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Milliken, W.; Albert, B. The Use of Medicinal Plants by the Yanomami Indians of Brazil. Econ. Bot. 1996, 50, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De Fátima Agra, M.; Silva, K.N.; Basílio, I.J.L.D.; de Freitas, P.F.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M. Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in the Region Northeast of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2008, 18, 472–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Do Nascimento Magalhães, K.; Guarniz, W.A.S.; Sá, K.M.; Freire, A.B.; Monteiro, M.P.; Nojosa, R.T.; Bieski, I.G.C.; Custódio, J.B.; Balogun, S.O.; Bandeira, M.A.M. Medicinal Plants of the Caatinga, Northeastern Brazil: Ethnopharmacopeia (1980–1990) of the Late Professor Francisco José de Abreu Matos. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 237, 314–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Desmarchelier, C.; Mongelli, E.; Coussio, J.; Giulietti, A.; Ciccia, G. Etnobotánica y Bioactividad de Plantas Medicinales Utilizadas Por Un Grupo Indígena Takana de La Amazonía Peruana. Acta Farm. Bonaer. 1995, 14, 195–208. [Google Scholar]
  55. Estudillo, R.L.; García, A.H. Catálogo de Plantas Medicinales Sonorenses; Universidad de Sonora: Sonora, Mexico, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  56. Madaleno, I.M.; El Montero, M.C. Cultivo Urbano de Plantas Medicinales, Su Comercialización y Usos Eitoterapeuticos En La Ciudad de Río Cuarto, Provincia de Córdoba, Argentina. Cuad. Geogr. 2012, 50, 63–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hernández, R.; Jordá, M.G. Plantas Medicinales; Editorial Pax Mexico: Mexico City, Mexico, 1981; ISBN 968461005X. [Google Scholar]
  58. Milliken, W.; Albert, B. The Use of Medicinal Plants by the Yanomami Indians of Brazil, Part II. Econ. Bot. 1997, 51, 264–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Molina-Mendoza, J.L.; Galván-Villanueva, R.; Patiño-Siciliano, A.; Fernández-Nava, R. Plantas Medicinales y Listado Florístico Preliminar Del Municipio de Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México. Polibotánica 2012, 34, 259–291. [Google Scholar]
  60. Saraiva, M.E.; de Alencar Ulisses, A.V.R.; Ribeiro, D.A.; de Oliveira, L.G.S.; de Macedo, D.G.; de Sousa, F.D.F.S.; de Menezes, I.R.A.; Sampaio, E.V.D.S.B.; de Almeida Souza, M.M. Plant Species as a Therapeutic Resource in Areas of the Savanna in the State of Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 171, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Argueta, A.; Cano Asseleih, L.M.; Rodarte García, M.E. Atlas de Las Plantas de La Medicina Tradicional Mexicana; Academia: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1994; ISBN 9682973236. [Google Scholar]
  62. De la Cruz, M.G.; Malpartida, S.B.; Santiago, H.B.; Jullian, V.; Bourdy, G. Hot and Cold: Medicinal Plant Uses in Quechua Speaking Communities in the High Andes (Callejón de Huaylas, Ancash, Perú). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 155, 1093–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Consolini, A.E.; Ragone, M.I.; Tambussi, A.; Paura, A. Estudio Observacional Del Consumo de Plantas Medicinales En La Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina, En El Período Diciembre de 2004-Noviembre de 2005. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2007, 26, 924. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pastar, I.; Liang, L.; Sawaya, A.P.; Wikramanayake, T.C.; Glinos, G.D.; Drakulich, S.; Chen, V.; Stojadinovic, O.; Davis, S.C.; Tomic-Canic, M. Preclinical Models for Wound-Healing Studies. In Skin Tissue Models; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Prado, L.G.; Arruda, H.S.; Araujo, N.M.P.; de Oliveira Braga, L.E.; Banzato, T.P.; Pereira, G.A.; Figueiredo, M.C.; Ruiz, A.L.T.G.; Eberlin, M.N.; de Carvalho, J.E. Antioxidant, Antiproliferative and Healing Properties of Araticum (Annona crassiflora Mart.) Peel and Seed. Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Thangavelu, S.; Balasubramanian, B.; Palanisamy, S.; Shanmugam, V.; Natchiappan, S.; Kalibulla, S.I.; Rathinasamy, B.; Arumugam, V.A. Characterization and Phytoconstituents of Petroselinum crispum (Mill) and Coriandrum sativum (Linn) and Their Impacts on Inflammation—An in vitro Analysis against Human Adenocarcinoma Cells with Molecular Docking. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 146, 776–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Geller, F.C.; Teixeira, M.R.; Pereira, A.B.D.; Dourado, L.P.A.; Souza, D.G.; Braga, F.C.; Simões, C.M.O. Evaluation of the Wound Healing Properties of Hancornia speciosa Leaves. Phyther. Res. 2015, 29, 1887–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Santos, J.A.A.; da Silva, J.W.; dos Santos, S.M.; de Rodrigues, M.F.; Silva, C.J.A.; da Silva, M.V.; Correia, M.T.S.; Albuquerque, J.F.C.; Melo, C.M.L.; Silva, T.G. In vitro and in vivo Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Babassu Oil (Attalea speciosa Mart. Ex Spreng., Arecaceae). Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 8858291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Alerico, G.C.; Beckenkamp, A.; Vignoli-Silva, M.; Buffon, A.; von Poser, G.L. Proliferative Effect of Plants Used for Wound Healing in Rio Grande Do Sul State, Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 176, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Balekar, N.; Katkam, N.G.; Nakpheng, T.; Jehtae, K.; Srichana, T. Evaluation of the Wound Healing Potential of Wedelia trilobata (L.) Leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jorge, M.P.; Madjarof, C.; Ruiz, A.L.T.G.; Fernandes, A.T.; Rodrigues, R.A.F.; de Oliveira Sousa, I.M.; Foglio, M.A.; de Carvalho, J.E. Evaluation of Wound Healing Properties of Arrabidaea chica Verlot Extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 118, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carvalho, E.G.; Soares, C.P.; Blau, L.; Menegon, R.F.; Joaquim, W.M. Wound Healing Properties and Mucilage Content of Pereskia aculeata from Different Substrates. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2014, 24, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Geller, F.; Schmidt, C.; Göttert, M.; Fronza, M.; Schattel, V.; Heinzmann, B.; Werz, O.; Flores, E.M.M.; Merfort, I.; Laufer, S. Identification of Rosmarinic Acid as the Major Active Constituent in Cordia americana. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 128, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. De Oliveira Rodrigues, R.; Yaochite, J.N.U.; Sasahara, G.L.; Albuquerque, A.A.; da Cruz Fonseca, S.G.; de Vasconcelos Araújo, T.D.; Santiago, G.M.P.; de Sousa, L.M.; de Carvalho, J.L.; Alves, A.P.N.N. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Healing Potential of Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Bauhinia ungulata L.(Fabaceae) on in vitro and in vivo Wound Model. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 2845–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Coco, J.C.; Ataide, J.A.; Sake, J.A.; Tambourgi, E.B.; Ehrhardt, C.; Mazzola, P.G. In vitro Antioxidant and Wound Healing Properties of Baru Nut Extract (Dipteryx alata Vog.) in Pulmonary Epithelial Cells for Therapeutic Application in Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease (COPD). Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zippel, J.; Deters, A.; Hensel, A. Arabinogalactans from Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poiret Bark as Active Principles for Wound-Healing Properties: Specific Enhancement of Dermal Fibroblast Activity and Minor Influence on HaCaT Keratinocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bueno, F.G.; Panizzon, G.P.; de Leite Mello, E.V.S.; Lechtenberg, M.; Petereit, F.; de Mello, J.C.P.; Hensel, A. Hydrolyzable Tannins from Hydroalcoholic Extract from Poincianella pluviosa Stem Bark and Its Wound-Healing Properties: Phytochemical Investigations and Influence on in vitro Cell Physiology of Human Keratinocytes and Dermal Fibroblasts. Fitoterapia 2014, 99, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bridi, H.; Beckenkamp, A.; Ccana-Ccapatinta, G.V.; de Loreto Bordignon, S.A.; Buffon, A.; von Poser, G.L. Characterization of Phloroglucinol-enriched Fractions of Brazilian Hypericum Species and Evaluation of Their Effect on Human Keratinocytes Proliferation. Phyther. Res. 2017, 31, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vittorazzi, C.; Endringer, D.C.; de Andrade, T.U.; Scherer, R.; Fronza, M. Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Properties of Struthanthus vulgaris. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pereira, L.O.M.; Vilegas, W.; Tangerina, M.M.P.; Arunachalam, K.; Balogun, S.O.; Orlandi-Mattos, P.E.; Colodel, E.M.; de Oliveira Martins, D.T. Lafoensia pacari A. St.-Hil.: Wound Healing Activity and Mechanism of Action of Standardized Hydroethanolic Leaves Extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 219, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. De Freitas Figueiredo, F.; Cechinel Filho, V.; Damazo, A.S.; Arunachalam, K.; Colodel, E.M.; Ribeiro, M.; Venturini, C.L.; Oliveira, D.M.; Machado, M.T.M.; Pavan, E. Sorocea guilleminiana Gaudich.: Wound Healing Activity, Action Mechanisms, and Chemical Characterization of the Leaf Infusion. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 248, 112307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Mazutti da Silva, S.M.; Rezende Costa, C.R.; Martins Gelfuso, G.; Silva Guerra, E.N.; de Medeiros Nóbrega, Y.K.; Gomes, S.M.; Pic-Taylor, A.; Fonseca-Bazzo, Y.M.; Silveira, D.; de Oliveira Magalhães, P. Wound Healing Effect of Essential Oil Extracted from Eugenia dysenterica DC (Myrtaceae) Leaves. Molecules 2018, 24, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Da Pitz, H.S.; Pereira, A.; Blasius, M.B.; Voytena, A.P.L.; Affonso, R.C.L.; Fanan, S.; Trevisan, A.C.D.; Ribeiro-do-Valle, R.M.; Maraschin, M. In vitro Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity and Wound Healing Properties of Jaboticaba (Plinia peruviana) Fruit Peel Hydroalcoholic Extract. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 3403586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Csepregi, R.; Temesfői, V.; Das, S.; Alberti, Á.; Tóth, C.A.; Herczeg, R.; Papp, N.; Kőszegi, T. Cytotoxic, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant Properties and Effects on Cell Migration of Phenolic Compounds of Selected Transylvanian Medicinal Plants. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. De Moura Sperotto, N.D.; Steffens, L.; Veríssimo, R.M.; Henn, J.G.; Péres, V.F.; Vianna, P.; Chies, J.A.B.; Roehe, A.; Saffi, J.; Moura, D.J. Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activities Induced by a Plantago australis Hydroethanolic Extract Standardized in Verbascoside. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 225, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hernández-Pasteur, G.; Silva-Bermúdez, P.S.; Reyes-Chilpa, R.; Vibrans, H.; Soto-Hernández, M. E Evaluación in vitro de la Actividad Cicatrizante y Antibacteriana de Extractos de Buddleja cordata Kunth y Vismia baccifera (L.) Triana & Planch. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2019, 42, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  87. Benvenutti, L.; Nunes, R.; Venturi, I.; Ramos, S.A.; Broering, M.F.; Goldoni, F.C.; Pavan, S.E.; Pastor, M.V.D.; Malheiros, A.; Quintão, N.L.M. Anti-Inflammatory and Healing Activity of the Hydroalcoholic Fruit Extract of Solanum diploconos (Mart.) Bohs. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 9957451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Villegas, L.F.; Fernández, I.D.; Maldonado, H.; Torres, R.; Zavaleta, A.; Vaisberg, A.J.; Hammond, G.B. Evaluation of the Wound-Healing Activity of Selected Traditional Medicinal Plants from Peru. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 55, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pérez-Contreras, C.V.; Alvarado-Flores, J.; Orona-Ortiz, A.; Balderas-López, J.L.; Salgado, R.M.; Zacaula-Juárez, N.; Krötzsch, E.; Navarrete, A. Wound Healing Activity of the Hydroalcoholic Extract and the Main Metabolites of Amphipterygium adstringens (Cuachalalate) in a Rat Excision Model. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 293, 115313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Oreopoulou, A.; Tsimogiannis, D.; Oreopoulou, V. Extraction of Polyphenols from Aromatic and Medicinal Plants: An Overview of the Methods and the Effect of Extraction Parameters. In Polyphenols in Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Guimarães, I.; Baptista-Silva, S.; Pintado, M.; Oliveira, A.L. Polyphenols: A Promising Avenue in Therapeutic Solutions for Wound Care. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Da Silveira Vasconcelos, M.; Gomes-Rochette, N.F.; de Oliveira, M.L.M.; Nunes-Pinheiro, D.C.S.; Tomé, A.R.; de Sousa, F.Y.M.; Pinheiro, F.G.M.; Moura, C.F.H.; Miranda, M.R.A.; Mota, E.F. Anti-Inflammatory and Wound Healing Potential of Cashew Apple Juice (Anacardium occidentale L.) in Mice. Exp. Biol. Med. 2015, 240, 1648–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fedel-Miyasato, L.E.S.; Kassuya, C.A.L.; Auharek, S.A.; Formagio, A.S.N.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Mauro, M.O.; Cunha-Laura, A.L.; Monreal, A.C.D.; Vieira, M.C.; Oliveira, R.J. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory, Immunomodulatory, Chemopreventive and Wound Healing Potentials from Schinus terebinthifolius Methanolic Extract. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2014, 24, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nayak, S.; Nalabothu, P.; Sandiford, S.; Bhogadi, V.; Adogwa, A. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of Allamanda cathartica. L. and Laurus nobilis. L. Extracts on Rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2006, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Santos, G.J.L.; Ferreira, T.C.; Rodrigues, A.L.M.; Freitas, J.C.C.; Morais, S.M.; Girão, V.C.C.; Nunes-Pinheiro, D.C.S. Involvement of Mast Cells, CD68+ and VEGF+ Expressions in Response to Himatanthus drasticus Commercial Latex in Mice Wound Healing Model. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2017, 69, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kyakulaga, A.H.; Olila, D.; Jane, F.N.; Omujal, F.; Ogwang, P.E. Wound Healing Potential of the Ethanolic Extracts of Bidens pilosa and Ocimum suave. African J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2011, 5, 132–136. [Google Scholar]
  97. Kreuger, M.R.O.; Farias, B.G.; Moreira, J.; Blind, L.Z.; Amoah, S.K.S.; Leite, A.S.; Biavatti, M.W.; Van Hoof, T.; D’Herde, K.; Cruz, A.B. Effects of the Topical Application of an Ethyl Acetate Fraction from Vernonia scorpioides on Excisional Wounds Infected with Staphylococcus aureus in Rats. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2012, 22, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Roy, P.; Amdekar, S.; Kumar, A.; Singh, R.; Sharma, P.; Singh, V. In vivo Antioxidative Property, Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Activity of Flower Extracts of Pyrostegia venusta (Ker Gawl) Miers. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 140, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Prabhakar, K.R.; Srinivasan, K.K.; Rao, P.G.M. Chemical Investigation, Anti-Inflammatory and Wound Healing Properties of Coronopus didymus. Pharm. Biol. 2002, 40, 490–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Perez, R.M.G.; Vargas, R.S.; Ortiz, Y.D.H. Wound Healing Properties of Hylocereus undatus on Diabetic Rats. Phyther. Res. 2005, 19, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ammar, I.; Bardaa, S.; Mzid, M.; Sahnoun, Z.; Rebaii, T.; Attia, H.; Ennouri, M. Antioxidant, Antibacterial and in vivo Dermal Wound Healing Effects of Opuntia Flower Extracts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Do Nascimento-Neto, L.G.; Evaristo, F.F.V.; de Alencar Alves, M.F.; Albuquerque, M.R.J.R.; dos Santos, H.S.; Bandeira, P.N.; Arruda, F.V.S.; Teixeira, E.H. Effect of the Triterpene 3β, 6β, 16β-Trihydroxylup-20 (29)-Ene Isolated from the Leaves of Combretum leprosum Mart. on Cutaneous Wounds in Mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 171, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bardaa, S.; Ben Halima, N.; Aloui, F.; Ben Mansour, R.; Jabeur, H.; Bouaziz, M.; Sahnoun, Z. Oil from Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) Seeds: Evaluation of Its Functional Properties on Wound Healing in Rats. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tuhin, R.H.; Begum, M.; Rahman, M.; Karim, R.; Begum, T.; Ahmed, S.U.; Mostofa, R.; Hossain, A.; Abdel-Daim, M.; Begum, R. Wound Healing Effect of Euphorbia hirta Linn.(Euphorbiaceae) in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gutierrez, R.M.P. Evaluation of the Wound Healing Properties of Acalypha langiana in Diabetic Rats. Fitoterapia 2006, 77, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Vaisberg, A.J.; Milla, M.; del Carmen Planas, M.; Cordova, J.L.; de Agusti, E.R.; Ferreyra, R.; del Carmen Mustiga, M.; Carlin, L.; Hammond, G.B. Taspine Is the Cicatrizant Principle in Sangre de Grado Extracted from Croton lechleri. Planta Med. 1989, 55, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hernandez-Hernandez, A.B.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J.; Almanza-Perez, J.C.; Nieto-Yañez, O.; Olivares-Sanchez, J.M.; Duran-Diaz, A.; Rodriguez-Monroy, M.A.; Canales-Martinez, M.M. Antimicrobial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities, Wound-Healing Effectiveness and Chemical Characterization of the Latex of Jatropha neopauciflora Pax. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 204, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Agra, I.K.R.; Pires, L.L.S.; Carvalho, P.S.M.; Silva-Filho, E.A.; Smaniotto, S.; Barreto, E. Evaluation of Wound Healing and Antimicrobial Properties of Aqueous Extract from Bowdichia virgilioides Stem Barks in Mice. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2013, 85, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. De Pereira, L.P.; Mota, M.R.L.; Brizeno, L.A.C.; Nogueira, F.C.; Ferreira, E.G.M.; Pereira, M.G.; Assreuy, A.M.S. Modulator Effect of a Polysaccharide-Rich Extract from Caesalpinia ferrea Stem Barks in Rat Cutaneous Wound Healing: Role of TNF-α, IL-1β, NO, TGF-β. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 187, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Paiva, L.A.F.; de Alencar Cunha, K.M.; Santos, F.A.; Gramosa, N.V.; Silveira, E.R.; Rao, V.S.N. Investigation on the Wound Healing Activity of Oleo-resin from Copaifera langsdorffi in Rats. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Amorim, J.L.; de Barros Figueiredo, J.; Amaral, A.C.F.; de Oliveira Barros, E.G.; Palmero, C.; MPalantinos, M.A.; de Souza Ramos, A.; Ferreira, J.L.P.; de Andrade Silva, J.R.; Benjamim, C.F.; et al. Wound Healing Properties of Copaifera paupera in Diabetic Mice. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nayak, B.S.; Raju, S.S.; Chalapathi Rao, A. V Wound Healing Activity of Persea americana (Avocado) Fruit: A Preclinical Study on Rats. J. Wound Care 2008, 17, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lodhi, S.; Singhai, A.K. Preliminary Pharmacological Evaluation of Martynia annua Linn Leaves for Wound Healing. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2011, 1, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nayak, B.S.; Kanhai, J.; Milne, D.M.; Pereira, L.P.; Swanston, W.H. Experimental Evaluation of Ethanolic Extract of Carapa guianensis L. Leaf for Its Wound Healing Activity Using Three Wound Models. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 419612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sharma, Y.; Kaur, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Srivastava, N.; Lal, M.; Madan, S.; Bala, K. Preclinical Assessment of Stem of Nicotiana tabacum on Excision Wound Model. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 109, 104731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nayak, B.S. Cecropia peltata L. (Cecropiaceae) Has Wound-Healing Potential: A Preclinical Study in a Sprague Dawley Rat Model. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 2006, 5, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Nayak, B.S.; Raju, S.S.; Eversley, M.; Ramsubhag, A. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of Lantana camara L.—A Preclinical Study. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Budovsky, A.; Yarmolinsky, L.; Ben-Shabat, S. Effect of Medicinal Plants on Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2015, 23, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Masson-Meyers, D.S.; Andrade, T.A.M.; Caetano, G.F.; Guimaraes, F.R.; Leite, M.N.; Leite, S.N.; Frade, M.A.C. Experimental Models and Methods for Cutaneous Wound Healing Assessment. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 101, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cross, S.E.; Naylor, L.; Coleman, R.A.; Teo, T.C. An Experimental Model to Investigate the Dynamics of Wound Contraction. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1995, 48, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abarca, L.F.S.; Klinkhamer, P.G.L.; Choi, Y.H. Plant Latex, from Ecological Interests to Bioactive Chemical Resources. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lovell, C.; Paulsen, E.; Lepoittevin, J.-P. Adverse Skin Reactions to Plants and Plant Products. In Contact Dermatitis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. De Oliveira, M.L.M.; Bezerra, B.M.O.; Leite, L.O.; Girão, V.C.C.; Nunes-Pinheiro, D.C.S. Topical Continuous Use of Lippia sidoides Cham. Essential Oil Induces Cutaneous Inflammatory Response, but Does Not Delay Wound Healing Process. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 153, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Barua, C.C.; Ara Begum, S.; Talukdar, A.; Datta Roy, J.; Buragohain, B.; Chandra Pathak, D.; Kumar Sarma, D.; Saikia Bora, R.; Gupta, A. Influence of Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze on Altered Antioxidant Enzyme Profile during Cutaneous Wound Healing in Immunocompromised Rats. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012, 2012, 948792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Barua, C.C.; Begum, S.A.; Pathak, D.C.; Bora, R.S. Wound Healing Activity of Alternanthera brasiliana Kuntze and Its Anti Oxidant Profiles in Experimentally Induced Diabetic Rats. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. TrivellatoGrassi, L.; Malheiros, A.; Meyre-Silva, C.; da Silva Buss, Z.; Monguilhott, E.D.; Fröde, T.S.; da Silva, K.A.B.S.; de Souza, M.M. From Popular Use to Pharmacological Validation: A Study of the Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Nociceptive and Healing Effects of Chenopodium ambrosioides Extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. De Moura, F.B.R.; Justino, A.B.; Ferreira, B.A.; Espindola, F.S.; de Assis Araújo, F.; Tomiosso, T.C. Pro-Fibrogenic and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of a Polyphenol-Enriched Fraction from Annona crassiflora in Skin Repair. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Moghadamtousi, S.Z.; Rouhollahi, E.; Hajrezaie, M.; Karimian, H.; Abdulla, M.A.; Kadir, H.A. Annona muricata Leaves Accelerate Wound Healing in Rats via Involvement of Hsp70 and Antioxidant Defence. Int. J. Surg. 2015, 18, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pereira, L.X.; Silva, H.K.C.; Longatti, T.R.; Silva, P.P.; Oliveira, C.D.L.; de Proietti, A.B.F.C.; Thomé, R.G.; do Carmo Vieira, M.; Carollo, C.A.; Demarque, D.P. Achyrocline alata Potentiates Repair of Skin Full Thickness Excision in Mice. J. Tissue Viability 2017, 26, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Umadevi, S.; Mohanta, G.P.; Kalaichelvan, V.K.; Manavalan, R. Studies on Wound Healing Effect of Flaveria trinervia Leaf in Mice. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 68, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Nayak, B.S.; Ramlogan, S.; Rao, A.V.C.; Maharaj, S. Neurolaena lobata L. Promotes Wound Healing in Sprague Dawley Rats. Int. J. Appl. Basic Med. Res. 2014, 4, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. García-Bores, A.M.; Álvarez-Santos, N.; López-Villafranco, M.E.; Jácquez-Ríos, M.P.; Aguilar-Rodríguez, S.; Grego-Valencia, D.; Espinosa-González, A.M.; Estrella-Parra, E.A.; Hernández-Delgado, C.T.; Serrano-Parrales, R. Verbesina crocata: A Pharmacognostic Study for the Treatment of Wound Healing. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 3113–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Leite, S.N.; Palhano, G.; Almeida, S.; Biavatti, M.W. Wound Healing Activity and Systemic Effects of Vernonia scorpioides Extract in Guinea Pig. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. De Castro Campos, N.P.; Cassini-Vieira, P.; de Souza-Fagundes, E.M.; Barcelos, L.S.; Castañon, M.C.M.N.; Scio, E. Pereskia aculeata Miller Leaves Accelerate Excisional Wound Healing in Mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 194, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lordani, T.V.A.; Brenzan, M.A.; Cortez, L.E.R.; Lordani, C.R.F.; Honda, P.A.; Lonardoni, M.V.C.; Cortez, D.A.G. Effect of a Topical Formulation Containing Calophyllum brasiliense Camb. Extract on Cutaneous Wound Healing in Rats. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 953–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. De Oliveira, M.L.M.; Nunes-Pinheiro, D.C.S.; Tomé, A.R.; Mota, E.F.; Lima-Verde, I.A.; de Melo Pinheiro, F.G.; Campello, C.C.; De Morais, S.M. In vivo Topical Anti-Inflammatory and Wound Healing Activities of the Fixed Oil of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. Seeds. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 129, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. De Moura, F.B.R.; Ferreira, B.A.; Deconte, S.R.; Landim, B.C.; Justino, A.B.; de Aro, A.A.; Espindola, F.S.; Rodrigues, R.A.F.; Ribeiro, D.L.; de Assis Araújo, F. Wound Healing Activity of the Hydroethanolic Extract of the Leaves of Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. Ex Reis. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2021, 11, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hermes, D.; Dudek, D.N.; Maria, M.D.; Horta, L.P.; Lima, E.N.; de Fatima, A.; Sanches, A.C.C.; Modolo, L.V. In vivo Wound Healing and Antiulcer Properties of White Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas). J. Adv. Res. 2013, 4, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Silva-Correa, C.R.; Ortiz-Noriega, C.M.; Villarreal-La Torre, V.E.; Calderón-Peña, A.A. Effect of a Gel Based on Ipomoea batatas (Purple Sweet Potato) on Dermal Wound Healing in Mice. Pharmacogn. J. 2021, 13, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Cavalcanti, J.M.; Leal-Cardoso, J.H.; Diniz, L.R.L.; Portella, V.G.; Costa, C.O.; Linard, C.F.B.M.; Alves, K.; de Paula Rocha, M.V.A.; Lima, C.C.; Cecatto, V.M. The Essential Oil of Croton zehntneri and Trans-Anethole Improves Cutaneous Wound Healing. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 144, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Esimone, C.O.; Nworu, C.S.; Jackson, C.L. Cutaneous Wound Healing Activity of a Herbal Ointment Containing the Leaf Extract of Jatropha curcas L.(Euphorbiaceae). Int. J. Appl. Res. Nat. Prod. 2008, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  142. León, F.; Hernandez-Zapata, V.; Bacab, M.C.; Maldonado, G.; Lezama, J.A.; Monteon, V. The Wound Healing Action of a Cream Latex Formulation of Jatropha gaumeri Greenm. in a Pre-Clinical Model. Vet. World 2020, 13, 2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ghosh, S.; Samanta, A.; Mandal, N.B.; Bannerjee, S.; Chattopadhyay, D. Evaluation of the Wound Healing Activity of Methanol Extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides (L.) Poit Leaf and Its Isolated Active Constituents in Topical Formulation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Gushiken, L.F.S.; Hussni, C.A.; Bastos, J.K.; Rozza, A.L.; Beserra, F.P.; Vieira, A.J.; Padovani, C.R.; Lemos, M.; Polizello Junior, M.; da Silva, J.J.M. Skin Wound Healing Potential and Mechanisms of the Hydroalcoholic Extract of Leaves and Oleoresin of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. Kuntze in Rats. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 6589270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Gouveia, M.C.P.; Minto, B.W.; Sargi, L.F.; Souza, R.L.; Pazzini, J.M.; Colodel, E.M.; Silva, V.C.P.; Cassino, P.C.; Dias, L. Evaluation of the Alcoholic Extract of Dipteryx alata Vogel Almonds and Bark in Skin Wound Healing in C57BL6 Mice. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2021, 73, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kokane, D.D.; More, R.Y.; Kale, M.B.; Nehete, M.N.; Mehendale, P.C.; Gadgoli, C.H. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of Root of Mimosa pudica. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Costa, A.C.F.; Cavalcante, G.M. Evaluating the Use of an Ointment Based on Prosopis juliflora Leaves in the Topical Therapy of Wounds. Adv. Res. 2015, 5, 17440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hernandes, L.; da Silva Pereira, L.M.; Palazzo, F.; de Mello, J.C.P. Wound-Healing Evaluation of Ointment from Stryphnodendron adstringens (Barbatimão) in Rat Skin. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 46, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. De Oliveira, A.P.; de Franco, E.S.; Barreto, R.R.; Cordeiro, D.P.; de Melo, R.G.; de Aquino, C.M.F.; de Medeiros, P.L.; da Silva, T.G.; da Silva Góes, A.J.; de Sousa Maia, M.B. Effect of Semisolid Formulation of Persea americana Mill (Avocado) Oil on Wound Healing in Rats. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 472382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ekom, S.E.; Kuete, V. Methanol Extract from the Seeds of Persea americana Displays Antibacterial and Wound Healing Activities in Rat Model. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 282, 114573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; Xavier, A.A.; Vital, C.E.; Leite, J.P.V.; Melo, F.C.S.A.; Gonçalves, R.V. Hydroethanolic Extract of Strychnos pseudoquina Accelerates Skin Wound Healing by Modulating the Oxidative Status and Microstructural Reorganization of Scar Tissue in Experimental Type I Diabetes. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9538351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Sarandy, M.M.; Miranda, L.L.; Altoé, L.S.; Novaes, R.D.; Zanuncio, V.V.; Leite, J.P.V.; Goncalves, R.V. Strychnos pseudoquina Modulates the Morphological Reorganization of the Scar Tissue of Second Intention Cutaneous Wounds in Rats. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Dos Santos Gramma, L.S.; Marques, F.M.; Vittorazzi, C.; de Andrade, T.A.M.; Frade, M.A.C.; de Andrade, T.U.; Endringer, D.C.; Scherer, R.; Fronza, M. Struthanthus vulgaris Ointment Prevents an over Expression of Inflammatory Response and Accelerates the Cutaneous Wound Healing. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 190, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Lodhi, S.; Singhai, A.K. Wound Healing Effect of Flavonoid Rich Fraction and Luteolin Isolated from Martynia annua Linn. on Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Rats. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2013, 6, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Martínez, M.G.M.; Montalvo-Javé, E.E.; Toledo, E.W.; Sánchez, M.T.; Rodríguez, A.C.; Campos, A.G.; Hernández, G.L.; Fernández, R.O.; Franco, A.E.B. Efecto Cicatrizante de La Pomada Preparada Con Dorstenia drakena L.(Moraceae) En Heridas Cutáneas. Cir. Gen. 2008, 30, 204–210. [Google Scholar]
  156. Gutierrez, R.M.P.; Solis, R.V. Anti-Inflammatory and Wound Healing Potential of Prosthechea michuacana in Rats. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2009, 5, 219. [Google Scholar]
  157. Soares, R.D.F.; Campos, M.G.N.; Ribeiro, G.P.; Salles, B.C.C.; Cardoso, N.S.; Ribeiro, J.R.; Souza, R.M.; Leme, K.C.; Soares, C.B.; de Oliveira, C.M. Development of a Chitosan Hydrogel Containing Flavonoids Extracted from Passiflora edulis Leaves and the Evaluation of Its Antioxidant and Wound Healing Properties for the Treatment of Skin Lesions in Diabetic Mice. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2020, 108, 654–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Reinhardt, L.S.; Henn, J.G.; Moras, A.M.; de Moura Sperotto, N.D.; Ferro, M.B.; Cao, Z.; Roehe, A.V.; Petry, A.U.S.; Nugent, M.; Moura, D.J. Plantago australis Hydroethanolic Extract-Loaded Formulations: Promising Dressings for Wound Healing. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2021, 31, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gomez-Beloz, A.; Rucinski, J.C.; Balick, M.J.; Tipton, C. Double Incision Wound Healing Bioassay Using Hamelia patens from El Salvador. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 88, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Mora, C.A.; Chamorro, K.L.; Yupanqui, D.M.L.; Unzueta, R.J.S.; Mestanza, R.C.; Perez, P.R. Efecto Cicatrizante Del Ungüento de Dodonaea viscosa Jacq “Chamisa” En Ratones Balb/C 53. Ágora Rev. Cient. 2018, 4, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ekom, S.E.; Tamokou, J.-D.-D.; Kuete, V. Antibacterial and Therapeutic Potentials of the Capsicum annuum Extract against Infected Wound in a Rat Model with Its Mechanisms of Antibacterial Action. Biomed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 4303902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Abdul-Nasir-Deen, A.-Y.; Boakye, Y.D.; Osafo, N.; Agyare, C.; Boamah, D.; Boamah, V.E.; Agyei, E.K. Anti-Inflammatory and Wound Healing Properties of Methanol Leaf Extract of Physalis angulata L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 133, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. De Carvalho Bulhões, A.A.V.; de Moura Estevão, L.R.; Florencio-Silva, R.; Simoes, R.S.; Leite, A.G.B.; da Silva Cunha, D.M.S.; Ramos, C.S.; de Andrade Soares, E.B.; D’Emery, M.B.; da Câmara, C.A.G.; et al. Effects of the Healing Activity of Rosemary-of-Chapada (Lippia gracilis Schauer) on Cutaneous Lesions in Rats. Acta Cir. Bras. 2022, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. De Castro Souza, J.; de Moura Estevão, L.R.; Baratella-Evêncio, L.; Vieira, M.G.F.; Simões, R.S.; Florencio-Silva, R.; Evêncio-Luz, L.; Evêncio-Neto, J. Mast Cell Concentration and Skin Wound Contraction in Rats Treated with Ximenia americana L. Acta Cir. Bras. 2017, 32, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Faccio, G. Plant Complexity and Cosmetic Innovation. iScience 2020, 23, 101358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Villegas, L.F.; Marçalo, A.; Martin, J.; Fernández, I.D.; Maldonado, H.; Vaisberg, A.J.; Hammond, G.B. (+)-Ep i-α-Bisbolol Is the Wound-Healing Principle of Peperomia galioides: Investigation of the in vivo Wound-Healing Activity of Related Terpenoids. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 1357–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ambiga, S.; Narayanan, R.; Gowri, D.; Sukumar, D.; Madhavan, S. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of Flavonoids from Ipomoea carnea Jacq. Anc. Sci. Life 2007, 26, 45. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3330873/ (accessed on 28 April 2022).
  168. Schmidt, C.A.; Murillo, R.; Bruhn, T.; Bringmann, G.; Goettert, M.; Heinzmann, B.; Brecht, V.; Laufer, S.A.; Merfort, I. Catechin Derivatives from Parapiptadenia rigida with in vitro Wound-Healing Properties. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 2035–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. De Aquino, P.E.A.; de Souza, T.d.F.G.; Santos, F.A.; Viana, A.F.S.C.; Louchard, B.O.; Leal, L.K.A.M.; Rocha, T.M.; Evangelista, J.S.A.M.; de Aquino, N.C.; de Alencar, N.M.N. The Wound Healing Property of N-Methyl-(2 S, 4 R)-Trans-4-Hydroxy-L-Proline from Sideroxylon obtusifolium Is Related to Its Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Actions. J. Evid.-Based Integr. Med. 2019, 24, 2515690X19865166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Perez-Gutierrez, R.M.; Vargas-Solis, R. Wound Healing Properties of Triterpenes from Buddleia scordioides in Diabetic Rats. Pharm. Biol. 2008, 46, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Romero-Cerecero, O.; Zamilpa-Álvarez, A.; Jiménez-Ferrer, E.; Tortoriello, J. Exploratory Study on the Effectiveness of a Standardized Extract from Ageratina pichinchensis in Patients with Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hoversten, K.P.; Kiemele, L.J.; Stolp, A.M.; Takahashi, P.Y.; Verdoorn, B.P. Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Wounds in Older Adults. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 2021–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Rivera-Arce, E.; Chavez-Soto, M.A.; Herrera-Arellano, A.; Arzate, S.; Agüero, J.; Feria-Romero, I.A.; Cruz-Guzmán, A.; Lozoya, X. Therapeutic Effectiveness of a Mimosa tenuiflora Cortex Extract in Venous Leg Ulceration Treatment. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 109, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Phillips, P.; Lumley, E.; Duncan, R.; Aber, A.; Woods, H.B.; Jones, G.L.; Michaels, J. A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research into People’s Experiences of Living with Venous Leg Ulcers. J. Adv. Nurs. 2018, 74, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Freitas, A.L.; Santos, C.A.; Souza, C.A.S.; Nunes, M.A.P.; Antoniolli, Â.R.; da Silva, W.B.; da Silva, F.A. The Use of Medicinal Plants in Venous Ulcers: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Int. Wound J. 2017, 14, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Romero-Cerecero, O.; Zamilpa, A.; Tortoriello, J. Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Standardized Extract from Ageratina pichinchensis in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Planta Med. 2015, 81, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Namjoyan, F.; Kiashi, F.; Moosavi, Z.B.; Saffari, F.; Makhmalzadeh, B.S. Efficacy of Dragon’s Blood Cream on Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2016, 6, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Fernandez, O.; Capdevila, J.Z.; Dalla, G.; Melchor, G. Efficacy of Rhizophora mangle Aqueous Bark Extract in the Healing of Open Surgical Wounds. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 564–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Lammoglia-Ordiales, L.; Vega-Memije, M.E.; Herrera-Arellano, A.; Rivera-Arce, E.; Agüero, J.; Vargas-Martinez, F.; Contreras-Ruiz, J. A Randomised Comparative Trial on the Use of a Hydrogel with Tepescohuite Extract (Mimosa tenuiflora Cortex Extract-2G) in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers. Int. Wound J. 2012, 9, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hajhashemi, M.; Ghanbari, Z.; Movahedi, M.; Rafieian, M.; Keivani, A.; Haghollahi, F. The Effect of Achillea millefolium and Hypericum perforatum Ointments on Episiotomy Wound Healing in Primiparous Women. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ritsu, M.; Kawakami, K.; Kanno, E.; Tanno, H.; Ishii, K.; Imai, Y.; Maruyama, R.; Tachi, M. Critical Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in the Early Process of Wound Healing in Skin. J. Dermatol. Dermatol. Surg. 2017, 21, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Lin, Z.; Kondo, T.; Ishida, Y.; Takayasu, T.; Mukaida, N. Essential Involvement of IL-6 in the Skin Wound-healing Process as Evidenced by Delayed Wound Healing in IL-6-deficient Mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003, 73, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Wood, S.; Jayaraman, V.; Huelsmann, E.J.; Bonish, B.; Burgad, D.; Sivaramakrishnan, G.; Qin, S.; DiPietro, L.A.; Zloza, A.; Zhang, C. Pro-Inflammatory Chemokine CCL2 (MCP-1) Promotes Healing in Diabetic Wounds by Restoring the Macrophage Response. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Malone-Povolny, M.J.; Maloney, S.E.; Schoenfisch, M.H. Nitric Oxide Therapy for Diabetic Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1801210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Moreira, A.S.; Spitzer, V.; Schapoval, E.E.S.; Schenkel, E.P. Antiinflammatory Activity of Extracts and Fractions from the Leaves of Gochnatia polymorpha. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 638–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Salazar-Gómez, A.; Vargas-Díaz, M.E.; Meléndez-Camargo, M.E.; Pablo-Pérez, S.S. Antinociceptive Activity of the Ethanolic Extract of Trixis angustifolia DC. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Sharma, G.-D.; He, J.; Bazan, H.E.P. P38 and ERK1/2 Coordinate Cellular Migration and Proliferation in Epithelial Wound Healing: Evidence of Cross-Talk Activation between MAP Kinase Cascades. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 21989–21997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Palloni, A.; McEniry, M. Aging and Health Status of Elderly in Latin America and the Caribbean: Preliminary Findings. J. Cross. Cult. Gerontol. 2007, 22, 263–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Methods used to evaluate wound healing activity.
Figure 1. Methods used to evaluate wound healing activity.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01095 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of compounds 125.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of compounds 125.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01095 g002
Table 1. Latin American medicinal plants used traditionally for wound healing.
Table 1. Latin American medicinal plants used traditionally for wound healing.
Botanical FamilyPlant NamePlant Part, Way of
Administration
Reference
AcanthaceaeJusticia spicigera Schltdl.Infusion of leaves, oral[8]
Ruellia hygrophila Mart.Decoction of leaves, topical[9]
AlismataceaeSagittaria montevidensis Cham. and Schltdl.Infusion of leaves, oral[10]
AmaranthaceaeAchyranthes brasiliana (L.) Standl. (accepted name: Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze)Infusion of aerial parts, oral[11]
Alternanthera pungens KunthDecoction of aerial parts, topical[9]
Chenopodium ambrosioides L.Pulverized leaves, topical[12]
Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin and ClemantsMaceration of leaves, topical[13]
Gomphrena celosioides Mart.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[14]
Iresine herbstii Hook.Infusion of leaves, topical[15]
AnacardiaceaeAnacardium occidentale L.Maceration of fruits, topical[16]
Amphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) Standl.Pulverized bark, topical[17]
Myracrodruon urundeuva AllemãoInfusion of stem, topical[18]
Schinopsis lorentzii (Griseb.) Engl.Bark infusion, topical[9]
Schinus molle L.Infusion of leaves, topical[15]
Schinus terebinthifolia RaddiMaceration of leaves, topical[19]
Spondias mombin L.Resin, topical[20]
AnnonaceaeAnnona squamosa L.Pulverized leaves, topical[21]
ApiaceaeCyclospermum leptophyllum (Pers.) Sprague ex Britton and P. WilsonDecoction of aerial parts, topical[14]
Eryngium carlinae F.
Delaroche
Infusion of aerial parts, oral[22]
Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) FussDecoction of whole plant, topical[23]
ApocynaceaeAsclepias curassavica L.Latex, topical[24]
Asclepias linaria Cav.Latex, topical[25]
Cascabela thevetioides (Kunth) LippoldSap, topical[26]
Hancornia speciosa GomesDecoction of roots, topical[27]
Himatanthus drasticus (Mart.) PlumelLatex, topical[28]
Plumeria sucuuba Spruce ex Müll. Arg.Latex, topical[29]
Prestonia glabrata KunthInfusion of whole plant, topical[23]
Tabernaemontana catharinensis A. DC.Bark infusion, oral[14]
Tabernaemontana sananho Ruiz and Pav.Bark latex, topical[30]
Vallesia glabra (Cav.) LinkDecoction of branches, topical[9]
AquifoliaceaeIlex guayusa Loes.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[31]
AraceaeDracontium loretense K. KrauseCataplasm of tuber, topical[32]
Monstera lechleriana SchottLatex, topical[30]
Synandrospadix vermitoxicus (Griseb.) Engl.Tubercle, topical[33]
AraliaceaeOreopanax andreanus MarchalDecoction of leaves, topical[23]
ArecaceaeAttalea speciosa Mart.Seed oil, topical[29]
Socratea exorrhiza (Mart.) H. Wendl.Pulverized root, topical[29]
AristolochiaceaeProsopanche americana (R. Br.) Baill.Ashes of whole plant, topical[33]
AsparagaceaeAgave atrovirens Karw. ex Salm-DyckLeaves, topical[34]
AsteraceaeAcanthospermum australe (Loefl.) KuntzeDecoction of leaves, topical[19]
Achillea millefolium L.Infusion of whole plant, topical[22]
Ageratina pichinchensis (Kunth) R.M. King and H. Rob.Maceration of leaves and root, topical[35]
Baccharis genistelloides (Lam.) Pers.Decoction of aerial parts, topical[12]
Baccharis odorata KunthDecoction of leaves, topical[24]
Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz and Pav.) Pers.Decoction of leaves, topical[24]
Bidens pilosa L.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[36]
Chaptalia nutans (L.) Pol.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[37]
Eupatorium laevigatum Lam.Infusion of leaves, topical[15]
Eupatorium subhastatum Hook. and Arn.Decoction of aerial parts, topical[14]
Flaveria trinervia (Spreng.) C. MohrInfusion of aerial parts, topical[17]
Galinsoga parviflora Cav.Infusion of flowers, oral[22]
Gamochaeta coarctata (Willd.) KerguélenDecoction of whole plant, topical[38]
Grindelia oxylepis GreeneInfusion of whole plant, topical[39]
Haplopappus venetus (Kunth) S.F. BlakeDecoction of branches, topical[39]
Heterotheca inuloides Cass.Infusion of whole plant, topical[39]
Jungia paniculata (DC.) A. GrayInfusion of leaves, topical[38]
Molina latifolia Ruiz and PavDecoction of leaves and bark, topical[24]
Mutisia acuminata Ruiz and Pav.Pulverized leaves, topical[38]
Parthenium hysterophorus L.Decoction of leaves, topical[40]
Pluchea microcephala R.K. GodfreyDecoction of aerial parts, topical[9]
Pluchea sagittalis (Lam.) CabreraInfusion of leaves, topical[15]
Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass.Pulverized leaves, topical[30]
Psacalium decompositum (A. Gray) H. Rob. and BrettellRoot infusion, oral[41]
Pseudognaphalium canescens (DC.) Anderb.Maceration of leaves and roots, topical[26]
Pseudelephantopus spicatus (B. Juss. ex Aubl.) C.F. BakerCataplasm of aerial parts, topical[30]
Pterocaulon virgatum (L.) DC.Decoction of aerial parts, topical[14]
Senecio angulifolius DC.Pulverized leaves, topical[42]
Senecio rhizomatus RusbyInfusion of leaves, oral[38]
Schkuhria pinnata (Lam.) Kuntze ex Thell.Infusion of leaves, oral[8]
Smallanthus sonchifolius (Poepp.) H. Rob.Infusion of roots, topical[23]
Solidago chilensis MeyenMaceration of leaves, topical[11]
Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) PruskiInfusion of aerial parts, topical[10]
Spilanthes alba L’Hér.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[23]
Tagetes erecta L.Maceration of leaves, topical[36]
Tagetes mandonii Sch. Bip. ex KlattInfusion of leaves, topical[43]
Tagetes terniflora KunthDecoction of leaves and roots, topical[23]
Trixis angustifolia DC.Infusion of whole plant, oral[39]
Verbesina crocata (Cav.) Less.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[17]
Verbesina scabra Benth.Maceration of leaves with oil, topical[9]
Werneria nubigena KunthInfusion of whole plant, topical[43]
Xanthium strumarium L.Infusion of whole plant, topical[15]
BasellaceaeAnredera diffusa (Moq.) SperlingInfusion of leaves, topical[44]
BegoniaceaeBegonia glabra AublCataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
BignoniaceaeCrescentia cujete L.Fruit pulp, oral[45]
Fridericia chica (Bonpl.) L.G. LohmannCataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
Mussatia hyacinthina (Standl.) SandwithDecoction of bark, oral[29]
Tabebuia serratifolia (Vahl) G. NicholsonCataplasm of bark, topical[20]
Tanaecium nocturnum (Barb. Rodr.) Bureau and K. Schum.Decoction of bark, oral[29]
Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex KunthCataplasm of leaves and bark, topical[46]
BixaceaeBixa orellana L.Infusion of stem bark, topical[47]
BrassicaceaeCoronopus didymus (L.) Sm.Infusion of whole plant, topical[46]
BurseraceaeBursera arida (Rose) Standl.Latex, topical[17]
Bursera morelensis RamírezInfusion of bark, oral[48]
Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg.Resin, topical[37]
CactaceaeCephalocereus senilis (Haw.) Pfeiff.Pulp, topical[26]
Echinocereus poselgeri Lem.Maceration of roots, topical[26]
Nopalea cochenillifera (L.) Salm-DyckMaceration of roots, topical[8]
Pereskia sacharosa Griseb.Infusion of leaves, topical[47]
CalophyllaceaeCalophyllum brasiliense Cambess.Resin/topical[45]
CapparaceaeCapparis osmantha DielsCataplasm of bark, topical[30]
CaryophyllaceaeParonychia chilensis DC.Infusion of branches, oral[46]
CelastraceaeMaytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex ReissekInfusion of whole plant, topical[49]
Maytenus macrocarpa (Ruiz and Pav.) Briq.Decoction of bark, topical[32]
CleomaceaeCleome spinosa Jacq.Decoction of roots, topical[50]
ClusiaceaeClusia nemorosa G. Mey.Resin, topical[51]
Garcinia macrophylla Mart.Resin, topical[52]
CombretaceaeCombretum leprosum Mart.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[53]
CommelinaceaeCommelina coelestis Willd.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[5]
Dichorisandra ulei J.F. Macbr.Cataplasm of aerial parts, topical[30]
Tradescantia spathacea Sw.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[40]
ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulus crenatifolius var. peruviana Hallier f.Decoction of whole plant, oral[43]
Cuscuta grandiflora KunthDecoction of whole plant, topical[43]
Dichondra argentea Humb. and Bonpl. ex WilldDecoction of whole plant, topical[39]
Ipomoea asarifolia (Desr.) Roem. and Schult.Decoction of aerial parts, topical[52]
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.Infusion of leaves, topical[19]
Ipomoea carnea Jacq.Pulverized leaves, topical[9]
Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R. Br.Decoction of whole plant, topical[52]
Operculina hamiltonii (G. Don) D.F. Austin and StaplesInfusion of roots, topical[50]
CordiaceaeCordia americana (L.) Gottschling and J.S. Mill.Decoction of leaves, topical[14]
Cordia ecalyculata Vell.Infusion of leaves, oral[27]
CrassulaceaeSedum dendroideum DC.Infusion of leaves, topical[15]
CucurbitaceaeCucurbita maxima DuchesneSap fruit, topical[14]
Cucurbita pepo L.Latex, topical[40]
CyatheaceaeCyathea cuspidate KunzeDecoction of leaves, topical[54]
CyperaceaeCyperus articulates L.Decoction of tubercule, topical[54]
Scirpus californicus (C.A. Mey.) Steud.Decoction of the aerial rhizome, oral[43]
EquisetaceaeEquisetum bogotense KunthInfusion of leaves, topical[12]
EuphorbiaceaeAcalypha monostachya Cav.Infusion of leaves, topical[26]
Chamaesyce hirta (L.) MillspLatex, topical[24]
Chamaesyce hypericifolia (L.) Millsp.Latex, topical[24]
Croton antisyphiliticus Mart.Pulverized roots, topical[27]
Croton draconoides Müll. Arg.Resin, topical[47]
Croton lechleri Müll. Arg.Resin, topical[32]
Croton mutisianus KunthLatex, topical[23]
Croton pottsii (Klotzsch) Müll. Arg.Decoction of whole plant, topical[39]
Croton suaveolens Torr.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[26]
Hura crepitans L.Infusion of bark, topical[32]
Jatropha curcas L.Latex, topical[45]
Jatropha dioica Sessé ex Cerv.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[39]
Jatropha gossypiifolia L.Latex, topical[53]
Jatropha neopauciflora PaxLatex, topical[17]
Machaerium complanatum DuckeCataplasm of bark, topical[30]
Manihot tripartita (Spreng.) Müll. ArgInfusion of whole plant, oral[27]
Pedilanthus tithymaloides (L.) Poit.Infusion of aerial parts, oral[36]
Sapium haematospermum Müll. Arg.Decoction of leaves, topical[9]
Sapium laurifolium (A. Rich.) Griseb.Latex, topical[29]
Sapium marmieri HuberLatex, topical[30]
FabaceaeAcacia albicorticata BurkartPulverized bark, topical[33]
Acacia aroma Gillies ex Hook. and Arn.Decoction of leaves, topical[33]
Acacia caven MolinaInfusion of bark, topical[46]
Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A.C. Sm.Decoction of bark, topical[50]
Bauhinia divaricata L.Infusion of leaves, oral[55]
Caesalpinia paraguariensis (D. Parodi) BurkartPulverized bark, topical[14]
Caesalpinia spinosa (Molina) KuntzeDecoction of fruit, topical[24]
Cassia tomentosa L. f.Pulverized leaves, topical[38]
Copaifera langsdorffii Desf.Infusion of shell, oral[16]
Copaifera reticulata DuckeSap, topical[29]
Cercidium praecox (Ruiz and Pav. ex Hook.) HarmsAshes of stem and bark, topical[14]
Deguelia rariflora (Mart. ex Benth.) G.P. Lewis and Acev.-Rodr.Infusion of roots, oral[28]
Desmodium mexicanum SweetInfusion of whole plant, oral[12]
Erythrina crista-galli L.Pulverized bark and leaves, topical[14]
Erythrina dominguezii Hassl.Decoction of bark, oral[29]
Erythrina edulis Triana ex MicheliInfusion of bark, oral[23]
Geoffroea decorticans (Gillies ex Hook. and Arn.) BurkartPulverized leaves, topical[14]
Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[37]
Indigofera suffruticosa Mill.Infusion of leaves, oral[8]
Macrolobium acaciifolium (Benth.) BenthDecoction of stem bark, topical[47]
Mimosa albida Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd.Infusion of leaves, oral[5]
Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir.Maceration of whole plant, topical[22]
Myrocarpus frondosus AllemãoMaceration of aerial parts, topical[19]
Myroxylon balsamum (L.) HarmsInfusion of bark, topical[23]
Myroxylon peruiferum L. f.Infusion of bark, topical[46]
Parkia multijuga Benth.Powdered bark, topical[31]
Peltophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taub.Pulverized bark, topical[49]
Poeppigia procera C. PreslDecoction of bark, topical[45]
Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC.Decoction of leaves and seed, topical[23]
Prosopis ruscifolia Griseb.Decoction of leaves, topical[9]
Prosopis vinalillo Stuck.Decoction of leaves, topical[9]
Psoralea pubescens PoirDecoction of aerial parts, topical[43]
Senna morongii (Britton) H.S. Irwin and BarnebyDecoction of aerial parts, topical[9]
Senna pendula (Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd.) H.S. Irwin and BarnebyAshes of leaves, topical[33]
Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) CovillePulverized bark, topical[27]
Stryphnodendron coriaceum Benth.Decoction of bark, topical[53]
Stryphnodendron rotundifolium Mart.Infusion of bark, topical[50]
Trifolium amabile KunthDecoction of roots, topical[43]
Vachellia caven (Molina) Seigler and EbingerPulverized bark, topical[56]
GeraniaceaeGeranium mexicanum KunthPulverized aerial parts, topical[57]
Pelargonium odoratissimum (L.) L’Hér.Infusion of leaves, topical[23]
HeliotropiaceaeHeliotropium angiospermum MurrayDecoction of whole plant, topical[42]
Heliotropium curassavicum var. argentinum I.M. Johnst.Decoction of aerial parts, topical[14]
Heliotropium procumbens Mill.Decoction of aerial parts, topical[9]
HypericaceaeVismia guianensis (Aubl.) ChoisyLatex, topical[58]
JuglandaceaeJuglans neotropica DielsDecoction of leaves, topical[43]
LamiaceaeLeonurus sibiricus L.Infusion of leaves, oral[11]
Salvia mexicana L.Infusion of leaves, topical[36]
Salvia stachydifolia BenthPulverized leaves, topical[56]
LecythidaceaeBertholletia excelsa Bonpl.Infusion of stem bark, oral[28]
LoranthaceaeStruthanthus crassipes (Oliv.) EichlerInfusion of leaves, topical[40]
Struthanthus densiflorus (Benth.) Standl.Infusion of flowers, oral[8]
LosaceaeMentzelia cordifolia Dombey ex Urb. and GilgDecoction of aerial parts, topical[38]
LythraceaeCuphea aequipetala Cav.Pulverized aerial parts, topical[59]
MalpighiaceaeBanisteriopsis caapi (Spruce ex Griseb.) C.V. MortonDecoction of stem, topical[23]
Byrsonima sericea DCMaceration of bark, topical[60]
MalvaceaeCeiba aesculifolia subsp. parvifolia (Rose) P.E. Gibbs and SemirPulverized bark, topical[17]
Gossypium barbadense L.Seeds, oral[50]
Heliocarpus appendiculatus Turcz.Latex, topical[40]
Malachra alceifolia Jacq.Decoction of whole plant, topical[37]
Modiola caroliniana (L.) G. DonDecoction of leaves, topical[14]
Sida rhombifolia L.Infusion of roots, oral[23]
Sphaeralcea angustifolia (Cav.) G. DonDecoction of leaves, oral[36]
Waltheria communis A. St.-Hil.Infusion of whole plant, topical[15]
MarantaceaeMaranta arundinacea L.Pulverized rhizome, topical[58]
MeliaceaeCarapa guianensis Aubl.Seed oil, topical[28]
Guarea kunthiana A. Juss.Infusion of leaves, topical[23]
MenispermaceaeCissampelos pareira L.Pulverized leaves, topical[14]
MyrsinaceaeArdisia compressa KunthInfusion of leaves, topical[40]
MyrtaceaeBlepharocalyx tweediei (Hook. and Arn.) O. BergInfusion of leaves, topical[8]
Campomanesia rufa (O. Berg) Nied.Infusion of roots, oral[27]
Psidium guajava L.Infusion leaves, topical[57]
Psidium guineense Sw.Decoction of leaves, topical[19]
MoraceaeDorstenia houstonii LLatex, topical[37]
Ficus americana Aubl.Resin, topical[47]
Ficus insipida Willd.Pulverized bark and leaves, topical[49]
Sorocea houlletiana Gaudich. (accepted name: Sorocea guilleminiana Gaudich.)Cataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
NyctaginaceaeMirabilis jalapa L.Infusion of leaves, topical[10]
OnagraceaeFuchsia hypoleuca I.M. Johnst.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[23]
Fuchsia magellanica Lam.Infusion of leaves, topical[23]
Gaura hexandra OrtegaDecoction of whole plant, topical[39]
Oenothera rosea L’Hér. ex AitonDecoction of whole plant, topical[8]
PapaveraceaeArgemone mexicana L.Infusion of flowers and seeds, oral[22]
Argemone ochroleuca SweetDecoction of roots, topical[61]
Argemone subfusiformis G.B. OwnbeyDecoction of aerial parts, topical[14]
Bocconia frutescens L.Infusion of leaves, oral[36]
PetiveriaceaePetiveria alliacea L.Infusion of aerial parts, topical[15]
PhytolaccaceaePhytolacca icosandra L.Infusion of leaves, topical[51]
PicramniaceaePicramnia spruceana Engl.Infusion of leaves, topical[58]
PiperaceaePeperomia congona SodiroInfusion of whole plant, oral[62]
Peperomia galioides KunthPulverized whole plant, topical[38]
Piper aduncum L.Infusion of leaves, oral[8]
Piper affictum Trel.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
Piper barbatum KunthInfusion of whole plant, topical[23]
Piper confusionis Trel.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
Piper dichotomum Ruiz and PavCataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
Piper ecuadorense SodiroInfusion of leaves, oral[23]
Piper loretoanum Trel.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[30]
Piper peltatum L.Decoction of leaves, topical[54]
Piper regnellii (Miq.) C. DC.Infusion of leaves, topical[15]
Piper sanctum (Miq.) Schltdl. ex C. DC.Infusion of leaves, oral[36]
PlagiochilaceaePlagiochila hondurensis Herzog ex CarlCataplasm of whole plant, topical[31]
PlantaginaceaeMecardonia procumbens (Mill.) SmallPulverized aerial parts, topical[59]
Plantago tomentosa Lam.Decoction of leaves, topical[10]
Scoparia dulcis L.Infusion of whole plant, topical[23]
PoaceaeGynerium sagittatum (Aubl.) P. Beauv.Pulverized leaves, topical[29]
PolygonaceaeMuehlenbeckia tamnifolia (Kunth) Meisn.Pulverized leaves, topical[38]
Muehlenbeckia volcanica (Benth.) Endl.Infusion of whole plant, oral[62]
Polygonum punctatum ElliottAshes of leaves, topical[14]
PolypodiaceaeCampyloneurum fuscosquamatum LellingerPulverized leaves, topical[29]
Microgramma squamulosa (Kaulf.) de la SotaInfusion of whole plant, oral[46]
PrimulaceaeCybianthus anthuriophyllus PipolyCataplasm of leaves and roots[30]
PteridaceaeAdiantum poiretii Wikstr.Cataplasm of whole plant, topical[39]
RhamnaceaeCeanothus azureus Desf. ex DCInfusion of whole plant, oral[5]
RhizophoraceaeRhizophora mangle L.Decoction of bark, topical[45]
RosaceaeRubus glaucus Benth.Infusion of leaves, topical[23]
RubiaceaeCarapichea ipecacuanha (Brot.) L. AnderssonInfusion of roots, topical[50]
Calycophyllum spruceanum (Benth.) Hook. f. ex K. Schum.Decoction of bark, topical[32]
Genipa americana L.Decoction of fruit, topical[20]
Hamelia patens Jacq.Infusion of leaves, oral[8]
Hintonia latiflora (DC.) BullockPulverized bark, topical[39]
Uncaria guianensis (Aubl.) J.F. Gmel.Decoction of bark, oral[32]
RutaceaeHelietta apiculate Benth.Infusion of bark, oral[49]
SalicaceaeSalix humboldtiana Willd.Decoction of bark, topical[9]
SapindaceaeAcer negundo L.Sap, topical[26]
Cardiospermum halicacabum L.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[5]
SapotaceaeSideroxylon obtusifolium (Humb. ex Roem. and Schult.) T.D. Penn.Infusion of aerial parts, oral[18]
SaururaceaeAnemopsis californica (Nutt.) Hook. and Arn.Decoction of whole plant, topical[39]
ScrophulariaceaeBuddleja cordata KunthDecoction of leaves, topical[36]
Buddleja sessiliflora KunthInfusion of leaves, topical[55]
SmilacaceaeSmilax bona-nox L.Infusion of roots, oral[26]
SolanaceaeBrugmansia candida Pers.Maceration of leaves, topical[36]
Brugmansia suaveolens (Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd.) SweetMaceration of leaves, topical[15]
Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum (Dunal) Heiser and PickersgillCataplasm of fruit, topical[26]
Cestrum auriculatum L’Hér.Pulverized leaves, topical[38]
Datura ferox L.Maceration of leaves with oil, topical[9]
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Cataplasm of fruit peel, topical[26]
Nicotiana glauca GrahamInfusion of leaves, topical[56]
Nicotiana tabacum L.Infusion of leaves, topical[11]
Physalis chenopodifolia Lam.Decoction of flowers, topical[23]
Physalis angulata L.Cataplasm of leaves, topical[32]
Solanum erianthum D. DonPulverized whole plant, topical[19]
Solanum glaucophyllum Desf.Ashes of stem, topical[33]
Solanum mammosum L.Cataplasm of fruit, topical[32]
Solanum nigrescens M. Martens and GaleottiMaceration of fruit, topical[36]
Solanum sessiliflorum DunalInfusion of fruit, oral[32]
TectariaceaeTectaria heracleifolia (Willd.) Underw.Infusion of whole plant, oral[8]
UrticaceaeCecropia peltata L.Pulverized leaves, topical[58]
VernenaceaeLippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Br. ex Britton and Wilson, P.Infusion of leaves, topical[19]
Lippia gracilis SchauerInfusion of leaves, topical[50]
Stachytarpheta cayennensis (Rich.) VahlMaceration of leaves, topical[11]
Verbena hispida Ruiz and Pav.Infusion of branches, oral[46]
Verbena litoralis KunthInfusion of whole plant, topical[23]
ViburnaceaeSambucus mexicana C. Presl ex DC.Infusion of leaves, oral[5]
Sambucus peruviana KunthPulverized leaves, topical[38]
XimeniaceaeXimenia americana L.Infusion of bark, topical[50]
ZamiaceaeZamia ulei DammerPulverized stem, topical[20]
ZygophyllaceaeBulnesia sarmientoi Lorentz ex Griseb.Pulverized bark, topical[63]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salazar-Gómez, A.; Alonso-Castro, A.J. Medicinal Plants from Latin America with Wound Healing Activity: Ethnomedicine, Phytochemistry, Preclinical and Clinical Studies—A Review. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091095

AMA Style

Salazar-Gómez A, Alonso-Castro AJ. Medicinal Plants from Latin America with Wound Healing Activity: Ethnomedicine, Phytochemistry, Preclinical and Clinical Studies—A Review. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(9):1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salazar-Gómez, Anuar, and Angel Josabad Alonso-Castro. 2022. "Medicinal Plants from Latin America with Wound Healing Activity: Ethnomedicine, Phytochemistry, Preclinical and Clinical Studies—A Review" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 9: 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop