Next Article in Journal
Reversal of Increase in Intestinal Permeability by Mangifera indica Seed Kernel Extract in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Emerging Therapeutic Modalities against COVID-19
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antibacterials in Aquatic Environment and Their Toxicity to Fish

1
Department of Zoology and Animal Welfare, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
2
Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13(8), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13080189
Submission received: 12 July 2020 / Revised: 5 August 2020 / Accepted: 7 August 2020 / Published: 9 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)

Abstract

:
Antibacterial agents are commonly present in aquatic environment at low concentrations. Terrestrial animal farms, human medicine and aquaculture are main sources of water contamination with antibacterials. Antibiotics were proved to be directly toxic to fish causing oxidative stress, general stress response, histopathological lesions, hematological, metabolic, and reproductive disorders, as well as immunosuppressive and genotoxic effects. Environmentally realistic low concentrations of antibiotics also disturb aquatic bacterial communities causing alterations in fish symbiotic microbiota and induce emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria by exerting selective pressure on spread of antibiotic-resistance genes.

1. Introduction

Antibacterial agents are commonly used to control bacterial diseases in both human and veterinary medicine. They include various bacteriostatic or bactericidal compounds such as antibiotics (substances produced by microorganisms or their synthetic analogs) and chemotherapeutics (artificial antibacterial agents that do not occur in nature). Due to their misuse, overdose, and poor absorption accompanied by high water solubility and resistance to degradation, antimicrobials are commonly found in environment [1,2]. Intensive livestock production is currently a main source of environmental antimicrobial load. According to Landers et al. [3], 24.6 million pounds of antimicrobials are used for nontherapeutic (prevention and growth promotion) purposes in chickens, cattle, and swine, compared with just 3.0 million pounds used in human medicine. Analysis of antimicrobial use in France from 1999 to 2005 revealed that in human medicine mainly β-lactams and macrolides are used, while in veterinary-tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and trimethoprim predominated [4]. Antimicrobials used in animals cannot be completely absorbed or metabolized in the organisms to which they have been administered, and about 30–90% of the used amount is excreted through urine and feces and released into the surrounding ecosystems [5]. According to Letsinger and Kay [6], only a small part of human pharmaceuticals have been monitored in aquatic environment and little is known about their effects on organisms. Large amounts of veterinary antimicrobials reach agricultural fields due to manure fertilization [7,8]. Thus, livestock manure is an important source of environment contamination with antimicrobial compounds [9]. Martinez-Carballo et al. [10] reported that in Austria pig manure contained up to 46 mg/kg of chlortetracycline, 29 mg/kg of oxytetracycline, and 23 mg/kg of tetracycline. Enrofloxacin was particularly observed in chicken and turkey samples. According to Zhao et al. [11], analysis of 61 pig, 54 chicken, and 28 cow manure samples collected in China revealed that pig manure contained up to 33.98 mg/kg ciprofloxacin, 33.26 mg/kg enrofloxacin, 59.06 mg/kg oxytetracycline, 21.06 mg/kg chlortetracycline, cow manure up to 29.59 mg/kg ciprofloxacin, 46.70 mg/kg enrofloxacin, 59.59 mg/kg oxytetracycline, and 27.59 mg/kg chlortetracycline, while in chicken manure 99.43 mg/kg fleroxacin, 225.45 mg/kg norfloxacin, 45.59 mg/kg ciprofloxacin, and 1420.76 mg/kg enrofloxacin was detected. According to Hu et al. [12], winter manure contained higher levels of various antibiotics (with maximum of 183.5 mg/kg oxytetracycline) than summer manure (up to 29.3 mg/kg tetracycline). Antibiotics released from manures can enter the soil, followed by ground and surface water. The presence of antibiotics in aquatic environment is worrying not only because of the possibility of the emergence of resistant bacterial strains [13], but also in the context of possible toxic effects on aquatic organisms, including fish.
The aim of the present review was to summarize available data on antibacterials present in aquatic environment, discuss the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance associated with them, but above all, analyze the toxic effects in fish that may occur due to contamination of aquatic environment with antibacterial drugs. These issues are relevant to protecting the aquatic environment from the pollution as well as in terms of the health of fish.

2. The Presence of Antibacterials in Aquatic Environment

The occurrence and fate of pharmaceutically active compounds in aquatic environment has been recognized as one of the emerging issues in environmental chemistry [14]. Awad et al. [5] observed high concentrations of tetracyclines and sulfonamides in river water close to a swine manure composting facility in Korea. Considerable seasonal variation was reported: in June water contained up to 46 µg/L of tetracycline and 4.6 µg/L of sulfathiazole, while in September 255 and 10.6 µg/L, respectively. Wei et al. [15] examined animal wastewater and surface water around large-scale livestock and poultry farms in China. They monitored 53 samples collected from 27 large-scale animal farms in 11 cities and counties of Jiangsu Province. Ten veterinary antimicrobial compounds were detected in wastewaters, 8 of them were found in pond waters, and animal farm-effluents and river water samples were contaminated by 9 compounds. The most frequently detected antimicrobials were sulfamethazine (75%), oxytetracycline (64%), tetracycline (60%), sulfadiazine (55%), and sulfamethoxazole (51%), with a maximum concentrations of 211, 72.9, 10.3, 17.0, and 63.6 µg/L, respectively. Zhou et al. [16] investigated the occurrence of 4 classes of 17 commonly used human and veterinary antibiotics in the sediments of the Yellow River, Hai River, and Liao River (China). Norfloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and oxytetracycline were most frequently detected in all rivers studied, with concentrations up to 5770, 1290, 653, and 652 µg/L, respectively. According to Cui et al. [17], drinking water source reservoir in the Yangtze River delta contained 12 antimicrobial compounds belonging to 4 classes (sulfonamides, fluoroquinones, tetracyclines, and macrolides). Cheng et al. [18] reported the presence of quinolones, tetracyclines, amphenicols, and sulfonamides at concentrations 0.2–421 ng/L in river water samples from North China. Li et al. [19] reviewed the occurrence of antimicrobials in water and sediments from 7 major rivers and 4 seas of China. They reported frequent presence of 12 compounds belonging to sulfonamides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides at median concentrations under 100 ng/L in water and 100 ng/g in the sediments. According to Liu et al. [20], China is the world largest producer and exporter of aquatic food products and antimicrobials are widely applied in aquaculture. A total of 20 antibacterial agents belonging to 8 groups (aminoglycosides, β-lactams, chloramphenicols, macrolides, nitrofurans, quinolones, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines) were used in 1996–2013, among them 12 compounds were not authorized. Teglia et al. [21] observed 0.97–22.1 µg/L of various fluoroquinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin, and difloxacin) in farm wastewaters of various regions in Argentina. Gbylik-Sikorska et al. [22] investigated the occurrence of commonly used veterinary antibacterial agents in 159 fresh water, 443 fish, and 150 sediment samples from Polish rivers and lakes. This study showed the presence of aminoglycosides, β-lactams, diaminopyrimidines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, lincosamides, pleuromutilins, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines. Sacher et al. [23] reported the occurrence of sulfamethoxazole (maximum concentration 410 ng/L) and anhydro-erythromycin (the degradation product of erythromycin; up to 49 ng/L) in groundwater samples collected in Germany. Managaki et al. [24] found 7 human-used antimicrobials: sulfamethoxazole, sulfapyridine, trimethoprim, erythromycin-H2O, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin at concentrations 4–448 ng/L in the urban Tamagawa River, Japan, and sulfamethoxazole, sulfamethazine, trimethoprim, and erythromycin-H2O (7–360 ng/L) in urban and rural areas of Mekong Delta, Vietnam. The authors also showed the presence of sulfamethazine at high concentrations (19.2 and 18.5 µg/L) in a pig farm wastewater.
According to Bielen et al. [25], antimicrobial compounds may appear in effluents of the pharmaceutical industries. They observed macrolide antibiotic azithromycin and macrolide by-products (up to 10.5 mg/L) in the treated wastewater from a Croatian antibiotic-producing company and concentrations up to 30 µg/L) in the recipient river. In effluents of another pharmaceutical factory fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines to about 200 µg/L were observed and concentrations of these compounds from below the limit of quantification to a range of µg/L were measured in the recipient stream. High frequency of bacteria resistant to azithromycin (up to 83%), sulfamethazine (up to 90%) and oxytetracycline (up to 50%) were also found in the effluents.
Aquaculture itself is also a source of environmental contamination with antimicrobials. They are commonly used in modern aquaculture to prevent or treat fish bacterial diseases that result from fish rearing at high stocking densities that induce stress, suppress immune system and facilitate pathogen transmission. The issue of use of antimicrobial drugs in aquaculture and related resistance of ichthyopathogenic bacteria was studied already over 20 years ago [26]. Development of aquaculture industry resulted in the widespread use of antimicrobials, especially in developing countries, to prevent or treat bacterial infections in fish [27]. The use of large amounts of various antibiotics resulted in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in aquatic environments and in alterations of the aquatic bacterial communities. Andrieu et al. [28] reported that effluents of Pangasius catfish farm in Vietnam contained 0.68 µg/L of enrofloxacin and 0.25 µg/L of ciprofloxacin. Antibiotics accumulated in sediments down-stream the effluent discharge at concentrations up to 2590 µg/kg d.w. (dry weight) and 592 µg/L d.w., respectively. Miranda et al. [29] reported that Chilean salmon farms in 2005–2016 used 0.31–0.64 kg of antibiotics per harvested ton of fish. In 2005 mainly flumequine (~40%), oxytetracycline (~25%), oxolonic acid (~20%), and florfenicol (~15%) were used, while in 2016 mainly florfenicol (>80%) and oxytetracycline (<20%). According to Holmstrom et al. [30], antibacterial agents (tetracyclines, quinolones, sulfonamides, and other) were commonly used in Thai shrimp farming to treat diseases and for prophylaxis. The issues of the presence of antibacterial drug residues in the edible tissues of treated fish, environmental hazards, and development of resistant bacteria are considered a serious concern [31]. According to Liu et al. [32], tissue levels of sulfonamides, trimethoprim, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides in 7 wild fish species from Laizhou Bay (North China) in 2016 ranged from 22 to 500 ng/g dw. Conti et al. [33] revealed illegal antimicrobials: crystal violet, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, fluoroquinoloneenrofloxacin, malachite green, and the metabolites of furaltadone and furazolidone in the samples of feed and fish from a fish farm in eastern Sicily, Italy. According to the authors, illegal antimicrobials are widely used in aquaculture all over the world.
The data summarized in Table 1 (most of them from China [15,16,17,18,34,35,36,37]) show that 11 groups of antibacterials were found in aquatic environments. Among them, sulfonamides were the most commonly reported (33% of data), followed by fluoroquinolones (23%), tetracyclines (18%), macrolides (12%), diaminopyrimidines (7%), and phenicol antibiotics (2.6%). Single reports are available on the presence of aminoglycosides, β-lactams, lincosamides, and pleuromutilins.
Sulfonamides are broad spectrum chemotherapeutics, effective against Gram-positive and some Gram-negative bacteria and commonly applied in both human and veterinary medicine [38]. According to Hruska and Franek [39], sulfonamides are often used in swine and cattle farms to treat bacterial diseases, and thus such farms may be a source of these compounds in aquatic environment. Fluoroquinolones are relatively new synthetic antibiotics showing a broad spectrum and potent bactericidal activity against various clinically important pathogens [40]. According to Sarkozy [41], fluoroquinolones are used in humans to treat a variety of severe infections located in tissues inaccessible or caused by bacteria resistant to other antimicrobials. Many fluoroquinolone compounds are also approved for use in animals and applied in swine, cattle, and poultry farming being main source of water contamination. Quinolone antibiotics are also used in treatment of bacterial diseases in fish [42]. Tetracyclines are broad-spectrum antibiotics active against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and protozoans. Versatility and high antimicrobial activity accompanied by the absence of major adverse side effects has led to their extensive use for treatment of human and animal infections. Tetracyclines are widely applied for the treatment of infections in poultry, cattle, sheep, swine, and domestic pets [43]. In the European Union tetracycline preparations are registered for use in cattle, pig, sheep, goat, horse, dog, cat, poultry, rabbit, and fish [44]. According to Jelic and Antolovic [45], macrolides are natural (produced by Streptomyces sp.) and newly-synthesized cyclic peptide compounds, the most commonly used class of antibiotics. Diaminopyrimidines (e.g., trimethoprim) are synthetic, broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, mainly used in treatment of human urinary tract infections [46]. According to Kolar et al. [47], trimethoprim is also used in veterinary medicine for pigs and poultry. Phenicol compounds (chloramphenicol and its derivatives) are synthetic broad-spectrum bacteriostatic and bactericidal agents effective against many Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms, used in human and veterinary medicine [48,49]. Aminoglycosides are natural or semisynthetic antibiotics derived from actinomycetes, active against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. They were one of the first groups of antibiotics applied for the clinical use [50]. Aminoglycosides used in veterinary medicine are effective in treating cattle bacterial enteritis and mastitis and used in prophylaxis or as growth promoters. However, aminoglycoside use as growth promoters is illegal in the European Union [51]. β-lactam antibiotics include numerous compounds being the most widely used class of antimicrobials due to their broad antibacterial spectrum and low toxicity [52]. They are used in both human and veterinary medicine [4]. According to Rezanka et al. [53], lincosamides are bacteriostatic or, at higher concentrations, bactericidal antibiotics active against Gram-positive bacteria and protozoans. Lincosamides and macrolides are used for treatment of swine gastrointestinal and respiratory infections and cattle respiratory disease [54]. Pleuromutilins include diterpene antibiotics derived from basidiomycetes and semisynthetic compounds, active against anaerobic, and some Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Most of them are used exclusively in veterinary medicine for treatment of bacterial gastrointestinal and respiratory infections in pigs and poultry, while they are not approved for ruminants or horses [55]. From 2007, pleuromutilin retapamulin is used also in humans [56].
Sulfonamides (at least 12 compounds) were observed in natural waters at the concentrations from undetectable or several ng/L to over 10 µg/L (Table 1). The highest concentrations (over 200 µg/L) were measured in effluents from terrestrial animal production or pharmaceutical industry. Little data are available on concentrations of sulfonamides in sediments (0.28–5 µg/kg).
Concentrations of fluoroquinolones (at least 7 compounds) in natural waters reported by various authors ranged from nondetectable to 5.7 µg/L, while in wastewaters up to 98 µg/L. Fluoroquinolones were also found in sediments at concentrations from below the detection limit to about 2.6 mg/kg.
Tetracyclines (at least 4 compounds) were commonly observed in natural waters at the concentrations ranging from several ng/L to even over 254 µg/L, while in wastewaters up to 72.9 µg/L. Tetracyclines were also found in the sediments at the levels up to 625 µg/kg.
The observed levels of macrolide antibiotics (at least 6 compounds) in natural waters ranged from a few ng/L up to 5 µg/L. Wastewaters from pharmaceutical industries contained even over 5.6 mg/L of macrolides, while the sediments up to 67.7 µg/kg.
Trimethoprim was also often detected in aquatic environments at the concentrations up to 380 ng/L in natural waters and to 5.6 µg/L in pharmaceutical effluents, while the maximum level noted in the sediment was 9.84 µg/kg.
Single reports concerning the levels of other antimicrobials in water include 3 phenicol compounds present in river water (to 5.8–1.8 µg/L), aminoglycosides (up to 10 µg/L in natural freshwaters), diaminopyrimidines (<0.05 µg/L in water and <5 µg/kg in sediment), lincosamides (<0.02 µg/L in water), pleuromutilins (<0.02 µg/L), and β-lactams (to 10 µg/L in water and to 8 µg/kg in sediment).
These data showed that fluoroquinolones reached the highest levels in the sediments, while tetracyclines in the water.
Table 1. The occurrence of antibacterials in the aquatic environment.
Table 1. The occurrence of antibacterials in the aquatic environment.
GroupAntibacterial AgentsMaximum ConcentrationSample Type/SourceSite/RegionCountryReference
Aaminoglycosides10 µg/L
ND
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
BLβ-lactams10 µg/L
8 µg/kg
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
Ddiaminopyrimidines<0.05 µg/L
<5 µg/kg
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
Dtrimethoprimdet
5.63 µg/kg
9.84 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Dtrimethoprim≈60 ng/L
≈50 ng/L
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Dtrimethoprim4.41 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Dtrimethoprim5.4 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Dtrimethoprim5.60 μg/L effluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Dtrimethoprim6.3 ng/L
22.1 ng/L
1.3 ng/L
Huangpu River
Pearl River Estuary
East China Sea
urban area
from Dongjiang towards the open sea
influenced by poultry and fish farming
ChinaFisch et al. [34]
Dtrimethorpim380 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Fciprofloxacin32.8 µg/kg
1290 µg/kg
28.7 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Fciprofloxacin176.14 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Fciprofloxacin641.3 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Fciprofloxacin1.14 μg/L
ND
wastewaters
river water
different locationsArgentinaTeglia et al. [21]
Fciprofloxacin0.25 μg/L
592 µg/kg
pond effluents
sediments
fish farm in the Mekong DeltaVietnamAndrieu et al. [28]
Fdifloxacin14.2 μg/L
ND
wastewaters
river water
different locationsArgentinaTeglia et al. [21]
Fenoxacin22.1 μg/L
ND
wastewaters
river water
different locationsArgentinaTeglia et al. [21]
FenrofloxacinND
2.34 µg/kg
ND
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Fenrofloxacin19.33 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Fenrofloxacin5681.9 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Fenrofloxacin11.9 μg/L
0.97 μg/L
wastewaters
river water
different locationsArgentinaTeglia et al. [21]
Fenrofloxacin98.00 μg/L effluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Fenrofloxacin0.86 μg/L
2590 µg/kg
pond effluents
sediments
fish farm in the Mekong DeltaVietnamAndrieu et al. [28]
Fenrofloxacin1.64 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Ffluoroquinolones<0.02 µg/L
6 µg/kg
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
FlomefloxacinND
298 µg/kg
5.82 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Fnorfloxacin141 µg/kg
5770 µg/kg
176 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Fnorfloxacin48.39 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Fnorfloxacin1893.2 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin- Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Fnorfloxacin1.43 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Fnorfloxacin174 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Fofloxacin123 µg/kg
653 µg/kg
50.5 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Fofloxacin18.95 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Fofloxacin11.2 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Fofloxacin1.78 μg/L
ND
wastewaters
river water
different locationsArgentinaTeglia et al. [21]
Fofloxacin4.3 µg/Lriver water main rivers of Hong Kong ChinaDeng et al. [37]
Fofloxacin2.34 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Llincosamides<0.02 µg/L
ND
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
Manhydro-erythromycin49 ng/Lgroundwatermonitoring wells in Baden-WürttembergGermanySacher et al. [23]
Mazithromycin≈450 ng/L
ND
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Mazithromycin3776.00 μg/Leffluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Merythromycin-H2O49.8 µg/kg
67.7 µg/kg
40.3 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Merythromycin-H2O≈120 ng/L
≈50 ng/L
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Merythromycin-H2O2009.00 μg/Leffluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Merythromycin-H2O2070 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Mmacrolides5 µg/L
8 µg/kg
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
MN-Desmethyl azithromycin 5660.00 μg/Leffluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Mroxithromycin6.8 µg/kg
11.7 µg/kg
29.6 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Mroxithromycin≈50 ng/L
ND
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Mroxithromycin2.35 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Mroxithromycin1880 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Mclarithromycin≈250 ng/L
ND
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Ppleuromutilins<0.02 µg/L
ND
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
Phchloramphenicol5.8 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Phflorfenicol1784.7 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Phthiamphenicol13.1 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Ssulfachloropyridazine3.49 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Ssulfadiazine0.29 µg/L
1.00 µg/L
0.89 µg/L
17.0 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
Ssulfadiazine22.0 µg/kg
1.18 µg/kg
11 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Ssulfadiazine20.82 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Ssulfadiazine4.7 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Ssulfadiazine20.00 μg/Leffluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Ssulfadiazine 14.8 µg/Lriver water main rivers of Hong Kong ChinaDeng et al. [37]
Ssulfadiazine14.5 ng/L
3.0 ng/L
8.3 ng/L
Huangpu River
Pearl River Estuary
East China Sea
urban area
from Dongjiang towards the open sea
influenced by poultry and fish farming
ChinaFisch et al. [34]
Ssulfadiazine3.17 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Ssulfadiazine103 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Ssulfadimidine 580.4 µg/Lriver water main rivers of Hong Kong ChinaDeng et al. [37]
Ssulfadoxine0.29 µg/L
0.46 µg/L
0.10 µg/L
0.63 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
SsulfamerazineND
11.9 ng/L
ND
Huangpu River
Pearl River Estuary
East China Sea
urban area
from Dongjiang towards the open sea
influenced by poultry and fish farming
ChinaFisch et al. [34]
Ssulfamethazine0.64 µg/L
4.66 µg/L
169 µg/L
211 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
SsulfamethazineND
5.67 µg/kg
ND
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
SsulfamethazineND
≈350 ng/L
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Ssulfamethazine9.60 µg/L
0.28 µg/kg
water
sediments
Naerincheon River across Hongcheon, Gangwon provinceKoreaAwad et al. [5]
Ssulfamethazine14.50 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Ssulfamethazine3.8 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Ssulfamethazine231.00 μg/Leffluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Ssulfamethazine446 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Ssulfamethoxazole0.19 µg/L
0.56 µg/L
0.57 µg/L
63.6 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
Ssulfamethoxazole410 ng/Lgroundwatermonitoring wells in Baden-WürttembergGermanySacher et al. [23]
Ssulfamethoxazole≈40 ng/L
≈180 ng/L
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Ssulfamethoxazole0.44 µg/L
0.73 µg/kg
water
sediments
Naerincheon River across Hongcheon, Gangwon provinceKoreaAwad et al. [5]
Ssulfamethoxazole51.86 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Ssulfamethoxazole11.6 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Ssulfamethoxazole3.1 µg/Lriver water main rivers of Hong Kong ChinaDeng et al. [37]
Ssulfamethoxazole9.6 ng/L
13.9 ng/L
4.4 ng/L
Huangpu River
Pearl River Estuary
East China Sea
urban area
from Dongjiang towards the open sea
influenced by poultry and fish farming
ChinaFisch et al. [34]
Ssulfamethoxazole1.82 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Ssulfamethoxazole418 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
Ssulfapyridine≈140 ng/L
ND
Tamagawa River (water samples)
Mekong Delta
(water samples)
Tokyo metropolitan area
suburbs and rural areas
Japan
Vietnam
Managaki et al. [24]
Ssulfapyridine3.2 µg/Lriver water main rivers of Hong Kong ChinaDeng et al. [37]
Ssulfapyrindine41.7 ng/Lriver waterPearl River SystemChinaYang et al. [35]
SsulfaquinoxalineND
det
det
0.64 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
Ssulfathiazole10.57 µg/L
0.64 µg/kg
water
sediments
Naerincheon River across Hongcheon, Gangwon provinceKoreaAwad et al. [5]
Ssulfonamides<0.05 µg/L
5 µg/kg
10 µg/kg
fresh water
sediments
fish
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
Ssulfamerazine2.49 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Tchlortetracycline49.3 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Tchlortetracycline0.57 µg/L
2.42 µg/L
3.67 µg/L
1.10 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
TchlortetracyclineND
10.9 µg/kg
32.5 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Tchlortetracycline44.42 µg/L
16.30 µg/kg
water
sediments
Naerincheon River across Hongcheon, Gangwon provinceKoreaAwad et al. [5]
Toxytetracycline6.87 µg/L
2.20 µg/L
11.1 µg/L
72.9 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
Toxytetracycline184 µg/kg
422 µg/kg
652 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Toxytetracycline0.32 µg/L
1.43 µg/kg
water
sediments
Naerincheon River across Hongcheon, Gangwon provinceKoreaAwad et al. [5]
Toxytetracycline241.50 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Toxytetracycline51.5 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Toxytetracycline29.00 μg/L effluentspharmaceutical industries areaCroatiaBielen et al. [25]
Ttetracycline0.93 µg/L
0.81 µg/L
6.44 µg/L
10.3 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province)ChinaWei et al. [15]
Ttetracycline18.0 µg/kg
135 µg/kg
4.82 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow River
Hai River
Liao River
ChinaZhou et al. [16]
Ttetracycline254.82 µg/L
75.70 µg/kg
water
sediments
Naerincheon River across Hongcheon, Gangwon provinceKoreaAwad et al. [5]
Ttetracycline94.66 ng/Ldrinking waterYangtze River deltaChinaCui et al. [17]
Ttetracycline31.4 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Ttetracycline26 ng/Lwater samplesurban area of BeijingChinaMa et al. [36]
Ttetracyclines0.05 µg/L
5 µg/kg
fresh water
sediments
14 sampling points in Polish rivers and lakesPolandGbylik-Sikorska et al. [22]
TdoxycyclineND
ND
ND
39.5 µg/L
pond water
river water
farm effluents
animal wastewater
27 large-scale animal farms (Jiangsu Province) ChinaWei et al. [15]
TdoxycyclineND
7.0 µg/kg
2.8 µg/kg
sediments
sediments
sediments
Yellow RiverHai RiverLiao RiverChinaZhou et al. [16]
Tdoxycycline43.3 ng/Lriver waterBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regionChinaCheng et al. [18]
Tdoxycycline82.2 µg/Lriver water main rivers of Hong Kong ChinaDeng et al. [37]
det—detected, quantification not possible; ND—not detected, A—aminoglycosides, BL—beta lactams, D—diaminopyrimidines, F—fluoroquinolones, L—lincosamides, M—macrolides, P—pleuromutulins, Ph—phenicol antibiotics, S—sulfonamides, T—tetracyclines.

3. Antibiotic Resistance in Aquatic Environment

Increasing antibiotic resistance of bacterial fish pathogens in aquaculture is observed for many years [57,58,59]. Natural ecosystems, including aquatic environment, constitute a potential source of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) for human pathogens [60]. Recently, it was recognized that antibiotic resistant microorganisms and resistance determinants are ubiquitous in environments, even those that were never exposed to antimicrobial agents, and that environment is an important reservoir of emerging antibiotic resistance genes [29]. The ARGs evolved over time under natural conditions, long before the use of antibiotics [61]. However, irrational use of antibiotics in the last four decades accelerated spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria across the globe [59]. Antibiotics are used in aquaculture to prevent and treat bacterial infections in fish and invertebrates [58]. Excessive use of antibiotics in aquaculture results from frequent bacterial infections in fish under conditions of intensive culture. Antibiotics present for a long time at significant concentrations in aquatic environment are the principal selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Susceptible bacteria in the sediment and water are replaced by resistant ones [58]. Antibiotics in fish culture are usually administered via feed and the intestinal environment of fish is an optimal site for the selection of antibiotic resistant bacteria [62]. Through fish feces, antibiotic resistant bacteria are dispersed to the water column or sediments. While, subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics may stimulate mutagenesis and horizontal transfer of genes [63]. Mutations can lead to change of specific molecular structures in bacterial cells that are attacked by the antibiotics and loss of antibiotic affinity of these structures [59]. Resistance to antimicrobials may also result from transferring of resistance genes among the bacteria. Horizontal transfer of ARGs from one bacterium to another is a common mechanism [64]. Resistance of bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial treatment is not limited to the intensive culture of fish but also is a great challenge in human and veterinary medicine [65]. Aquaculture can promote the occurrence of antibiotic resistance in human and animal bacterial pathogens because aquaculture facilities are often recipients of animal manure and urine that may contain antibiotics and bacterial cells carrying AGRs [66]. The presence of antibiotics in manure results from their use as growth promoters for farm animals. Hospital wastewaters released into the aquatic environment are another major source of AGRs and antibiotic-resistant organisms [7]. ARGs could be acquired by pathogens via horizontal gene transfer in aquaculture environment and in the food chain leading to decreased efficacy of different antibiotic groups and severely limits the therapeutic options in human infections [67]. Another site of AGRs transfer are sewage treatment plants, where resistant bacteria and other pathogens present in wastewater remain in close contact with sewage sludge bacteria during biological treatment [68]. Horizontal gene transfer may also take place in biofilms that are present both in live aquatic organisms and on other surfaces [69]. Some of antimicrobial resistance genes were first detected in aquatic bacteria and later also among human and animal pathogens. These include some of the quinolone resistance genes occurring in Vibrio, Shewanella, and Aeromonas, β-lactamase genes which are presence in Photobacterium damselae and Oceanobacillus iheyensis, a novel fosfomycin resistance gene isolated from aquatic environment, and the chloramphenicol resistance genes from aquatic Photobacterium, Vibrio, and Shewanella [58]. Resistance gene variants for β-lactams, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, macrolides were also detected in the genome of Renibacteriun salmoninarum and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [70,71]. In aquaculture farms, where antibiotics were used, significant increase in the frequency of bacteria resistant to oxytetracycline, quinolones, sulfa/trimethoprim, florfenicol, and amoxicillin was observed [58]. Oxytetracycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic, belonging to the tetracycline class and is one of the antibiotics most widely used in aquaculture. This antibiotic is used primarily in Canada, Norway, and the United States for treatment of fish bacterial diseases caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, A. hydrophila, A. sobia, Pseudomonas, Lactococcus garvieae, and Vibrio anguillarum [72]. Seyfried et al. [73] showed higher prevalence of tetracycline resistance (tetR) genes in aquaculture facilities with oxytetracycline use than those in which this antibiotic was not applied. Tamminen et al. [74] also showed the presence of tetracycline resistance genes such as tetA, tetC, tetH, and tetM in fish farm environments. Canada and Norway permit use of florfenicol, and Norway permits aquacultural use of quinolones. Florfenicol and oxytetracycline were the most frequently used antibiotics during 2016 in the Chilean salmon farms, which were mainly used to treat Piscirickettsia salmonis, currently considered as the main bacterial pathogen of salmon [29]. Fish pathogens and other aquatic bacteria such as Aeromonas salmonicida, A. hydrophila, Citrobacter freundii, Vibrio salmonicida, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, and Pseudomonas fluorescens developed resistance as a consequence of exposure to antibacterial agents [75]. The multidrug resistance of A. salmonicida pathogenic to fish is a result of the presence of transferable resistance plasmids in bacterial cells, and was described in many countries [76]. Akinbowale et al. [77] showed that among Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria isolated from farmed fish, crustaceans, and water from different parts of Australia, the resistance to β-lactams (ampicillin, amoxycillin), first-generation cephalosporins (cephalexin), and macrolides (erythromycin) was widespread. Additionally, resistance to oxytetracycline, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, and sulfonamides was common and multiple resistance was also observed. The study by Akinbowale et al. [77] provides support to the view that there is the risk of transfer of resistant bacteria to humans from consumption of aquaculture products. Aeromonas isolates from fish farms in Denmark showed resistance to amoxicillin (100%), oxytetracycline (69%), sulfadiazine-trimethoprim (43%), and oxolinic acid (20%). While, all Flavobacterium psychrophilum isolates were resistant to oxolinic acid, 71% and 50% were oxytetracycline and amoxicillin resistant, respectively [78]. Aeromonas isolates from three fish farms producing tilapia in South Africa were in 44% resistant to nalidixic acid and quinolone resistance genes: qnrB and qnrS were detected in 41% and 24% of isolates, respectively. The results obtained by Xiong et al. [79] showed that fish ponds in Guangdong, China were reservoirs of ARGs, and that the concentrations of tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and fluoroquinolones were as high as 446 μg/kg and 98.6 ng/L in sediment and water samples, respectively. Among resistance genes, the presence of tetracycline resistance genes (tetM, tetO, tetW, tetS, tetQ, tetX, tetB/P), sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2, sul3), and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes (oqxA, oqxB, aac (6′)-Ib, and qnrS) was confirmed. Tamminen et al. [74] found that ARGs persisted at fish farms in the absence of antibiotic selection, which is a result of gene transfer through mobile genetic elements that remain for a long time in aquatic environment. Antibiotics entering aquatic environment favor the selection of antibiotic resistance among environmental bacteria and fish pathogens. From aquatic environment, antibiotic-resistant bacteria can be transferred to humans. Furthermore, antibiotics can accelerate horizontal AGRs transfer, increasing the probability of resistance gene transfer from environmental bacteria to human pathogenic bacteria.

4. Toxic Effects of Antibacterials on Fish Organisms

4.1. Hematological and Blood Biochemical Changes

Analysis of blood parameters is an important tool used to assess the toxic effects of xenobiotics on fish [80,81]. However, most available data concerning hematological effects of antibacterials in fish regard mainly oxytetracycline [82,83,84,85,86,87] and very little information about other antibacterials were found (Table 2). In all these studies fish were subjected to relatively high doses administered via diet or injection. Exposure of fish to antibiotics may induce various hematological changes—increase in red blood cell parameters (RBC, Ht, Hb) or anemic response (Table 2). Similarly, leukocyte count may decrease (usually) or increase (rarely). However, the data are scarce and thus it is impossible to formulate conclusions.
Little is known also about the influence of antibacterials on the biochemical indices of plasma or serum, and the data published so far are mostly focused on the effects of oxytetracycline [82,83,84,88,89]. Analysis of the available data (Table 2) shows that activities of hepatic enzymes (ALT and AST) in fish exposed to oxytetracycline often increased, which may indicate a hepatotoxic effect of this antibiotic in fish. Hyperglycemia and an increase in cortisol show that antibiotics may induce stress response in fish.
Table 2. Effects of antibacterials on hematological and blood biochemical parameters in fish.
Table 2. Effects of antibacterials on hematological and blood biochemical parameters in fish.
Antibacterial AgentsDoseExposure Time (days)SpeciesHematological or Blood Biochemical Alterations Reference
IncreaseDecrease
florfenicol5 mg/kg body weight84Oreochromis niloticusLysoz, UreaAST, Creat Reda et al. [89]
gentamicin36 mg/kg (injection) Oreochromis niloticusALT, AST, GluBicarb, Ca, Chol, CK Cl, Fe, Mg, Na, RBC, TIBC, TP Chen et al. [90]
oxytetracycline75 mg/kg body weight per day (dietary)29Cyprinus carpioHtGlu, Lym, Mono, WBCDobsikova et al. [82]
oxytetracycline75 mg/kg body weight per day (dietary)50Cyprinus carpioAlb, Cl, Na, P, TP Dobsikova et al. [82]
oxytetracycline500 mg/kg of diet14Oreochromis niloticusALT, AST, Creat, PLT, Urea El-Adawy et al. [83]
oxytetracycline2.5 g/kg of diet14Oncorhynchus mykissALT, AST, Cort, GluLysoz, Neu, WBC Hoseini and Yousefi [84]
oxytetracycline100 mg/kg body weight per day (dietary)14Oncorhynchus kisutchALT, GSH Nakano et al. [88]
oxytetracycline0.63% of wet weight (dietary)56Oreochromis niloticusHbHb, PLT, RBC, WBCOmoregie and Oyebanji [85]
oxytetracycline1.25–5.00% of wet weight (dietary)56Oreochromis niloticus Hb, Ht, PLT, RBC, WBCOmoregie and Oyebanji [85]
oxytetracycline100 mg/kg diet84Oreochromis niloticusAST, Lysoz, UreaALT, Creat, IgMReda et al. [89]
oxytetracycline0.5 g/kg60Oreochromis niloticusPLTHtReda et al. [86]
oxytetracycline75 mg/kg body weight10Sparus aurataWBC Serezli et al. [87]
Biochemical indices: Alb—albumins, ALT—alanine transaminase, AST—aspartate transaminase, Bicarb—bicarbonate, Ca—calcium, Chol—cholesterol, CK—creatine kinase, Cl—chlorine, Cort—cortisol, Creat—creatinine, Fe—iron, Glu—glucose, GSH—glutathione (in plasma), IgM—immunoglobulin M, Lysoz—lysozyme, Mg—magnesium, Na—sodium, P—phosphorus, TIBC—total iron blood capacity, TP—total protein, Urea—urea. Hematological indices: Hb—hemoglobin concentration, Ht—hematocrit, Lym—lymphocytes, Mono—monocytes, Neu—neutrophils, PLT—thrombocyte count, RBC—erythrocyte count, WBC—leukocyte count.

4.2. Oxidative Stress Parameters

Available data indicate that antimicrobials may induce oxidative stress in fish. Ni et al. [91] revealed that Danio rerio exposed to 0.1–2.5 mg/L of maduramicin for 14 days showed upregulation (0.1 mg/L) or inhibition (2.5 mg/L) of hepatic SOD (superoxide dismutase), CAT (catalase), GPx (glutathione peroxidase), and GST (glutathione s-transferase) accompanied by lipid peroxidation (increased MDA level). According to Elia et al. [92], Cyprinus carpio fed oxytetracycline at therapeutic level (75 mg/kg) or at high level (150 or 300 mg/kg) for 10 days exhibited impaired antioxidant system: hepatic SOD activity decreased, while activities of GPx and GR increased. Limbu et al. [93] fed Oreochromis niloticus 80 mg/kg of oxytetracycline for 35 days and reported decreased hepatic SOD and GST activities, while serum MDA level and AST activity increased which indicates oxidative damage. In addition, intestinal and hepatic caspase 9 was upregulated which indicates increased apoptotic activity. Increased expression of hepatic mRNA for aminopeptidases, fatty acid synthase, lipase, and carnitine palmitoyltransferase were also observed. The observed changes indicate that oxytetracycline induced oxidative stress and disturbed hepatic functions. Contrary, no such effects were observed for gentamicin treatment. Bojarski et al. [94] revealed that single injection of 5 mg/kg of gentamicin administered to Carassius gibelio did not induce alterations in GSH level or activities of SOD, GPx or CAT which indicates that no oxidative stress occurred. However, according to Jones et al. [95], various fish species may differ in sensitivity to gentamicin and other antibacterials due to different renal structure (glomerular vs. aglomerular nephrons) and thus different rates of excretion. According to Silva de Oliveira et al. [96] embryos of Danio rerio exposed for 168 h to 20 µg/L of nitrofurantoin showed biochemical changes: increase in ChE (cholinesterase), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) and GST activities, while at 320 µg/L increase in CAT activity. Similarly, Nogueira et al. [97] reported that 96 h exposure to ciprofloxacin (0.005–0.488 µg/L) induced an increase in AChE activity and decrease in CAT activity in Danio rerio embryos or larvae. These data indicate that exposure of fish to antibacterials leads to changes in the oxidoreductive balance, and the type and magnitude of changes probably depend primarily on the type of therapeutic substance used and its dose, as well as fish species and developmental stage.

4.3. Histopathological Alterations

Histological analysis is often used to assess the toxic effects of xenobiotics on fish [94,98]. Rodrigues et al. [99] demonstrated that Oncorhynchus mykiss subjected to acute (96 h at 0.005–50 mg/L) or chronic (28 days at 0.31–5 µg/L) exposure to oxytetracycline showed minor or moderate and reversible histopathological lesions. Hypertrophy of mucous cells and hyperplasia of epithelial cells were observed in gills after acute exposure and lamellar fusion, epithelial lifting after chronic exposure. In liver, hemorrhage and increase of sinusoidal space, hepatocyte hypertrophy and nucleus pyknosis, vacuolation, and hepatocellular degeneration were observed after acute exposure. Islam et al. [100] revealed that Barbonymus gonionotus fed 4 g/kg of oxytetracycline for 45 days showed hepatic and renal histopathological lesions: vacuolation of hepatocytes, fatty degeneration of liver, and lymphocyte aggregations in kidney.
The results obtained by Rodrigues et al. [101] demonstrated that Oncorhynchus mykiss exposed for 96 h to 0.001–10 mg/L or for 28 days to 0.05–0.8 µg/L of erythromycin showed various histopathological alterations: branchial epithelial hyperplasia and hypertrophy of mucous cells. After acute exposure aneurysm, edema, epithelial lifting, and lamellar fusion were also reported, accompanied by hepatocyte vacuolation, nuclear pyknosis, hepatocyte degeneration, sinusoid enlargement, and hemorrhage.
According to Augusto et al. [102], Oreochromis nilotica treated with gentamicin (2 intraperitoneal injections of 5 or 25 mg/kg) showed dose-dependent acute tubular necrosis. Regeneration of damaged epithelia and development of new nephrons were observed post injury. Similarly, Reimschuessel et al. [103] reported that Opsanus tau intraperitoneally injected with 2.5–50 mg/kg of gentamicin showed extensive necrosis of nephric proximal tubules and no recovery was observed. According to Reimschuessel and Williams [104], Carassius auratus after single intraperitoneal gentamicin dose of 50 mg/kg showed nephron injury followed by regeneration and development of new nephrons within 2–3 weeks post injection. Salice et al. [105] found nephron neogenesis in Carassius auratus subjected to repeated injections with 50 mg/kg of gentamicin. The above data clearly indicate that gentamicin is nephrotoxic to fish.
These data show that fish exposure to various antibiotics can result in the development of histopathological lesions. The organs that appear to be most sensitive to the toxic effects of these substances are liver, kidneys, and gills.

4.4. Other Toxic Effects

Lethal concentrations of antibiotics to adult fish are usually high but different agents differ in their toxic power. According to Marking et al. [106], the values of 96 h LC50 of oxytetracycline, tetracycline and erythromycin for Salvelinus namaycush were: <200, 220, and 410 mg/L, respectively. Toxicity of 7 fluoroquinolone antibiotics to Pimephales promelas was studied and the results showed that only clinafloxacin caused almost 100% mortality at the concentration of 10 mg/L but no mortality at 2 mg/L [107]. Carraschi et al. [108] reported that 48 h LC50 of oxytetracycline to Piaractus mesopotamicus was 7.6 mg/L, while of florfenicol >1000 mg/L. According to Martins et al. [109], 96 h LC50 of ciprofloxacin to Gambusia holbrooki was >60 mg/L.
However, various sublethal effects were observed at low, environmentally realistic concentrations of antibiotics. Almeida et al. [110] reported enhanced exploratory behavior and stress response in Danio rerio after long-term exposure to low oxytetracycline concentrations. The authors supposed that antibiotic increased energy consumption and reduced lipid level. Oxidative damage was also observed and changes in the intestinal microbiota community structure. Toxic effects were observed at 0.1 µg/L which is an environmentally realistic concentration. According to Botelho et al. [111], Oreochromis niloticus exposed for 96 h to waterborne florfenicol and oxytetracycline at concentrations 212.5–850 or 4000–16000 ng/L, respectively (from the half to double environmental concentrations) showed genotoxic damage detected using comet assay and inspection of nuclear anomalies in erythrocytes. Oxytetracycline at low environmentally realistic concentrations induced glutathione pathway of detoxification that interfered with neurotransmission and caused metabolic disturbances in Oncorhynchus mykiss [112]. According to Zhou et al. [113], exposure of Danio rerio for 6 weeks to 0.26 µg/L of sulfamethoxazole or 0.42 µg/L of oxytetracycline caused an increase in fish metabolic rate and increased mortality due to Aeromonas hydrophila experimental infection. Exposure to antibiotics resulted in a decrease in intestinal goblet cell abundance, activities of alkaline and acid phosphatase, reduced antioxidant and increased inflammatory response, and oxytetracycline disturbed alimentary tract microbiota. Wang et al. [114] observed that β-diketone antibiotics at 6.25 or 12.5 mg/L reduced the levels of estradiol and testosterone, as well as gonadosomatic index of Danio rerio in a dose-dependent way. Egg production, fertilization rate, and hatching rate also declined. These results indicate reproductive toxicity of β-diketone antibiotics in fish.
Adverse effects of antibiotics on fish immune response were reported at both environmental concentrations and therapeutic doses of antibacterial compounds. According to Grondel et al. [115], isolated B and T pronephric lymphocytes of Cyprinus carpio after 4 days of incubation at 0.62–20 mg/L oxytetracycline and doxycycline showed disturbed mitotic activity, while no significant effect was observed at 0.15–0.31 mg/L. Rijkers et al. [116] observed suppression of humoral immune response in Cyprinus carpio treated orally with 2000 mg/kg of oxytetracycline, while in fish injected intraperitoneally (60 or 180 mg/kg) both humoral and cellular immune response were suppressed. Intramuscular injections of oxytetracycline and benzylpenicillin (20 mg/kg) disturbed homeostasis in healthy Oncorhynchus mykiss and caused immunosuppression [117].
Early developmental stages of fish are particularly sensitive to toxicity. Effluents from two Croatian pharmaceutical industries containing azithromycin or mixture (fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines) caused embryotoxicity in Danio rerio manifested as increased mortality, delayed development, reduced hatching rate, body malformations such as cardiac and vitelline edema, scoliosis, lack of pigmentation, and functional anomalies-altered heartbeat rate [25]. Exposure for 4 days to 0.2–0.6 mg/L of triclosan decreased body length, head, and eye size in Danio rerio embryos and activated apoptosis in central nervous system which resulted in decreased synaptic density and decrease in axon length [118]. Yan et al. [119] reported that exposure of Danio rerio embryos to macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin, clarithromycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin) resulted in cardiotoxicity: increased heart rate and pericardial edema. It was accompanied by spine curvatures, increased apoptosis rate, and oxidative stress. Exposure for 24 h to fluoroquinolone antibiotics: gatifloxacin (413–4239 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (156–1949 mg/L) reduced heart rate and cardiac output in Danio rerio embryos. Additionally, gatifloxacin exposure resulted in pericardial edema, while ciprofloxacin did not induce any morphological anomalies [120].

5. Conclusions

A wide variety of antimicrobial compounds are detected in aquatic environment, including antibiotics and chemotherapeutics. Although antimicrobials are used in aquaculture, they mostly come from terrestrial sources, mainly poultry and swine farm-effluents, and in lesser extent from human medicine. Concentrations of antimicrobial drugs in waters are usually very low (several ng or µg/L, very rarely reach the range of mg/L), being below lethal levels for fish. Most data concerning toxicity of antimicrobials to fish involve therapeutic doses that often produce side effects. However, some reports indicate that chronic exposure of fish to low, environmentally realistic concentrations of antimicrobial agents may result in physiological disturbances such as hematological alterations, oxidative stress, histopathological lesions, immunosuppression, metabolic disorders, genotoxic damage, general stress response, and reproductive impairment.
Disturbances in aquatic bacterial communities and symbiotic (particularly alimentary tract) microbiota of fish are another possible effect water contamination with antimicrobials.
Emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria in aquatic environment is also a serious threat due to selective pressure of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics present in water that accelerate transfer and spread of antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial communities.

Author Contributions

B.B.—article idea, data analysis, article writing; B.K.—data analysis, article writing; M.W.—data analysis, article writing, language correction. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was carried out with the financial support of Siedlce University of Natural Science and Humanities (Scientific Research Project No. 74/20/B).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sarmah, A.K.; Meyer, M.T.; Boxall, A.B.A. A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment (Review). Chemosphere 2006, 65, 725–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Limbu, S.M.; Zhou, L.; Sun, S.; Zhang, M.; Du, Z. Chronic exposure to low environmental concentrations and legal aquaculture doses of antibiotis cause systemic adverse effects in Nile tilapia and provoke differential human health risk. Environ. Int. 2018, 115, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Landers, T.F.; Cohen, B.; Wittum, T.E.; Larson, E.L. A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy, and potential. Pub. Health Rep. 2012, 127, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Moulin, G.; Cavalie, P.; Pellanne, I.; Chevance, A.; Laval, A.; Millemann, Y.; Colin, P.; Chauvin, C. A comparison of antimicrobial usage in human and veterinary medicine in France from 1999 to 2005. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 62, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Awad, Y.M.; Kim, S.C.; El-Azeem, A.M.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, K.R.; Kim, K.; Jeon, C.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Veterinary antibiotics contamination in water, sediment, and soil near a swine manure composting facility. Environ. Earth. Sci. 2014, 71, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Letsinger, S.; Kay, P. Comparison of prioritisation schemes for human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 3479–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Baquero, F.; Martίnez, J.L.; Canton, R. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr. Opinion Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jechalke, S.; Heuer, H.; Siemens, J.; Amelung, W.; Smalla, K. Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, K.R.; Owens, G.; Kwon, S.I.; So, K.H.; Lee, D.B.; Ok, Y.S. Occurrence and environmental fate of veterinary antibiotics in the terrestrial environment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 214, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martinez-Carballo, E.; Gonzalez-Barreiro, C.; Scharf, S.; Gans, O. Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 148, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, L.; Dong, Y.H.; Wang, H. Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures from feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Luo, Y. Occurrence and source analysis of typical veterinary antibiotics in manure, soil, vegetables and groundwater from organic vegetable bases, northern China. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 2992–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kemper, N. Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Ecol. Indicat. 2008, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heberer, T. Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: A review of recent research data. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 131, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, R.; Ge, F.; Huang, S.; Chen, M.; Wang, R. Occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in animal wastewater and surface water around farms in Jiangsu Province, China. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 1408–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, L.J.; Ying, G.G.; Zhao, J.L.; Yang, J.F.; Wang, L.; Yang, B.; Liu, S. Trends in the occurrence of human and veterinary antibiotics in the sediments of the Yellow River, Hai River and Liao River in northern China. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1877–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cui, C.; Han, Q.; Jiang, L.; Ma, L.; Jin, L.; Zhang, D.; Lin, K.; Zhang, T. Occurrence, distribution, and seasonal variation of antibiotics in an artificial water source reservoir in the Yangtze River delta, East China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 19393–19402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, J.; Jiang, L.; Sun, T.; Du, Z.; Lee, L.; Zhao, Q. Occurrence, seasonal variation and risk assessment of antibiotics in the surface water of North China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 77, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, S.; Shi, W.; Liu, W.; Li, H.; Zhang, W.; Hu, J.; Ke, Y.; Sun, W.; Ni, J. A duodecennial national synthesis of antibiotics in China’s major rivers and seas (2005–2016). Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 906–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Steele, J.C.; Meng, X.-Z. Usage, residue, and human health risk of antibiotics in Chinese aquaculture: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 223, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teglia, C.M.; Perez, F.A.; Michlig, N.; Repetti, M.R.; Goicoechea, H.C.; Culzoni, M.J. Occurence, distribution and ecological risk of fluoroquinolones in rivers and wastewaters. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 2305–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gbylik-Sikorska, M.; Posyniak, A.; Mitrowska, K.; Gajda, A.; Błądek, T.; Śniegocki, T.; Żmudzki, J. Occurrence of veterinary antibiotics and chemotherapeutics in fresh water, sediment, and fish of the rivers and lakes in Poland. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2014, 58, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sacher, F.; Lange, F.T.; Brauch, H.J.; Blankenhorn, I. Pharmaceuticals in groundwaters Analytical methods and results of a monitoring program in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 938, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Managaki, S.; Murata, A.; Takada, H.; Tuyen, B.C.; Chiem, N.H. Distribution of macrolides, sulfonamides, and trimethoprim in tropical waters: Ubiquitous occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in the Mekong Delta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 8004–8010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bielen, A.; Simatovic, A.; Kosic-Vuksic, J.; Senta, I.; Ahel, M.; Babic, S.; Jurina, T.; Gonzalez Plaza, J.J.; Milakovic, M.; Udikovic-Kolic, N. Negative environmental impacts of antibiotic-contaminated effluents from pharmaceutical industries. Wat. Res. 2017, 126, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alderman, D.J.; Hastings, T.S. Antibiotic use in aquaculture: Development of antibiotic resistance – potential for consumer health risks. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 33, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cabello, F.C. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Andrieu, M.; Rico, A.; Phu, T.M.; Huong, D.T.T.; Phuong, N.T.; Van den Brink, P.J. Ecological risk assessment of the antibiotic enrofloxacin applied to Pangasius catfish farms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Chemosphere 2015, 119, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miranda, C.D.; Godoy, F.A.; Lee, M.R. Current status of the use of antibiotics and the antimicrobial resistance in the Chilean salmon farms. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Holmstrom, K.; Graslund, S.; Wahlstrom, A.; Poungshompoo, S.; Bengtsson, B.E.; Kautsky, N. Antibiotic use in shrimp farming and implications for environmental impacts and human health. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 38, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Monteiro, S.H.; Moura Andrade, G.C.R.; Garcia, F.; Pilarski, F. Antibiotic residues and resistant bacteria in aquaculture. Pharmaceut. Chem. J. 2018, 5, 127–147. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, S.; Bekele, T.-G.; Zhao, H.; Cai, X.; Chen, J. Bioaccumulation and tissue distribution of antibiotics in wild marine fish from Laizhou Bay, North China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 631–632, 1398–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Conti, G.A.; Copat, C.; Wang, Z.; D Agati, P.; Cristaldi, A.; Ferrante, M. Determination of illegal antimicrobials in aquaculture feed and fish: An ELISA study. Food Control 2015, 50, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fisch, K.; Waniek, J.J.; Zhou, M.; Xia, Z.; Schulz-Bull, D.E. Antibiotics in three Chinese coastal systems: Huangpu River, East China Sea, Pearl River Estuary. J. Aquat. Pollut. Toxicol. 2017, 1, 13. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, J.F.; Ying, G.G.; Zhao, J.L.; Tao, R.; Su, H.C.; Liu, Y.S. Spatial and seasonal distribution of selected antibiotics in surface waters of the Pearl Rivers, China. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2011, 46, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, H.T.; Gao, K.; Yang, Y.S.; Meng, X.F.; Zhang, H.F.; Lang, C.; Wang, C.Y.; Guo, Y.; Dong, J.Z.; Song, X.M. Analysis of pollution levels of 7 antibiotics in the Wenyu river water of Beiyun River water system in Beijing after the pollution control: A preliminary study. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 186, 012068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Deng, W.; Li, N.; Zheng, H.; Lin, H. Occurrence and risk assessment of antibiotics in river water in Hong Kong. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2016, 125, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tacic, A.; Nikolic, V.; Nikolic, L.; Savic, I. Antimicrobial sulfonamide drugs. Adv. Technol. 2017, 6, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hruska, K.; Franek, M. Sulfonamides in the environment: A review and a case report. Vet. Med. 2012, 57, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sharma, P.C.; Jain, A.; Jain, S. Fluoroquinolone antibacterials: A review on chemistry, microbiology and therapeutic prospects. Acta. Pol. Pharmac-Drug Res. 2009, 66, 587–604. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarkozy, G. Quinolones: A class of antimicrobial agents. Vet. Med. 2011, 46, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Samuelsen, O.B. Pharmacokinetics of quinolones in fish: A review. Aquaculture 2006, 255, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chopra, I.; Roberts, M. Tetracycline antibiotics: Mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol. Molecul. Biol. Rev. 2001, 65, 232–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Michalova, E.; Novotna, P.; Schlegelova, J. Tetracyclines in veterinary medicine and bacterial resistance to them. Vet. Med. 2004, 49, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jelic, D.; Antolovic, L. From erythromycin to azithromycin and new potential ribosome-binding antimicrobials. Antibiotics 2016, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Wróbel, A.; Maliszewski, D.; Baradyn, M.; Drozdowska, D. Trimethoprim: An old antibacterial drug as a template to search for new targets. Synthesis, biological activity and molecular modeling study of novel trimethoprim analogs. Molecules 2020, 25, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kolar, B.; Arnus, L.; Jeretin, B.; Gutmaher, A.; Drobne, D.; Kos Durjava, D. The toxic effect of oxytetracycline and trimethoprim in the aquatic environment. Chemosphere 2014, 115, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Birdane, Y.O.; Birdane, F.M. Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol following intravenous and intramuscular administration in dogs. Vet. Med. 2015, 60, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dinos, G.P.; Athanassopoulos, C.M.; Missiri, D.A.; Giannopoulou, P.C.; Vlachogiannis, I.A.; Papadopoulos, G.E.; Papaioannou, D.; Kalpaxis, D.L. Chloramphenicol derivatives as antibacterial and anticancer agents: Historic problems and current solutions. Antibiotics 2016, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krause, K.M.; Serio, A.W.; Kane, T.R.; Connolly, L.E. Aminoglycosides: An overview. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a027029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hari, R.; Taherunnisa, S.; Raut, S.Y.; Mutalik, S.; Koteshwara, K.B. Challenges in the development of analytical test procedure for aminoglycosides: A critical review. J. Appl. Pharmac. Sci. 2019, 9, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bush, K.; Bradford, P.A. β-Lactams and β-Lactamase inhibitors: An overview. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, a025247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rezanka, T.; Spizek, J.; Sigler, K. Medicinal use of lincosamides and microbial resistance to them. Anti-Infective Agents Med. Chem. 2007, 6, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pyorala, S.; Baptiste, K.E.; Catry, B.; van Duijkeren, E.; Greko, C.; Moreno, M.A.; Matias Ferreira Pomba, M.C.; Rantala, M.; Ruzauskas, M.; Sanders, S. Macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs: Use and development of antimicrobial resistance. Vet. J. 2014, 200, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Schwarz, S.; Shen, J.; Kadlec, K.; Wang, Y.; Brenner Michael, G.; Feßler, A.T.; Vester, B. Lincosamides, streptogramins, phenicols, and pleuromutilins: Mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a027037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Novak, R.; Shlaes, D.M. The pleuromutilin antibiotics: A new class for human use. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2010, 11, 182–191. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dixon, B.A. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial fish pathogens. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 1994, 25, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cabello, F.C.; Godfrey, H.P.; Tomova, A.; Ivanova, L.; Dolz, H.; Millanao, A.; Buschmann, A.H. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: Its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1917–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rath, S.; Patra, B.K. Dispersal of antibiotic resistant bacteria into aquatic environment—An overview. J. Water Pollut. Control 2018, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  60. Martínez, J.L. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Science 2008, 321, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baquero, F.; Alvarez-Ortega, C.; Martinez, J.L. Ecology and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Le Bris, H.; Dhaouadi, R.; Naviner, M.; Giraud, E.; Mangion, C.; Armand, F.; De La Cotte, N.; Thorin, C.; Ganiere, J.-P.; Pouliquen, H. Experimental approach on the selection and persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Aeromonads in faecal matter of rainbow trout during and after an oxolinic acid treatment. Aquaculture 2007, 273, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Linares, J.F.; Gustafsson, I.; Baquero, F.; Martinez, J.L. Antibiotics as intermicrobial signaling agents instead of weapons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19484–19489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Blair, J.M.A.; Webber, M.A.; Baylay, A.J.; Ogbolu, D.A.; Piddock, L.J. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Marshall, B.M.; Levy, S.B. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 718–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Di Cesare, A.; Luna, G.M.; Vignaroli, C.; Pasquaroli, S.; Tota, S.; Paroncini, P.; Biavasco, F. Aquaculture can promote the presence and spread of antibiotic-resistant Enterococci in marine sediments. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Manage, P.M. Heavy use of antibiotics in aquaculture: Emerging human and animal health problems—A review. Sri. Lanka J. Aquat. Sci. 2018, 23, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bouki, C.; Venieri, D.; Diamadopoulos, E. Detection and the fate of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 91, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Balcazar, J.; Subirats, J.; Borrego, C. The role of biofilms as environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Crossman, L.C.; Gould, V.C.; Dow, J.M.; Vernikos, G.S.; Okazaki, A.; Sebaihia, M.; Saunders, D.; Arrowsmith, C.; Carver, T.; Peters, N. The complete genome, comparative and functional analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals an organism heavily shielded by drug resistance determinants. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wiens, G.D.; Rockey, D.D.; Wu, Z.; Chang, J.; Levy, R.; Crane, S.; Chen, D.S.; Capri, G.R.; Burnett, J.R.; Sudheesh, P.S. Genome sequence of the fish pathogen Renibacterium salmoninarum suggests reductive evolution away from an environmental Arthrobacter ancestor. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 6970–6982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Leal, J.F.; Santos, E.B.H.; Esteves, V.I. Oxytetracycline in intensive aquaculture: Water quality during and after its administration, environmental fate, toxicity and bacterial resistance. Rev. Aquacult. 2019, 11, 1176–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Seyfried, E.E.; Newton, R.J.; Rubert, K.F.; Pedersen, J.A.; McMahon, K.D. Occurrence of tetracycline resistance genes in aquaculture facilities with varying use of oxytetracycline. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 59, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Tamminen, M.; Karkman, A.; Lohmus, A.; Muziasari, W.I.; Takasu, H.; Wada, S.; Suzuki, S.; Virta, M. Tetracycline resistance genes persist at aquaculture farms in the absence of selection pressure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sorum, H. Antimicrobial drug resistance in fish pathogens. In Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin; Aarestrup, F.M., Ed.; Am Soc Microbiol Press: Washington DC, USA, 2006; pp. 213–238. [Google Scholar]
  76. Vincent, A.T.; Tanaka, K.H.; Trudel, M.V.; Frenette, M.; Derome, N.; Charette, S.J. Draft genome sequences of two Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida isolates harboring plasmids conferring antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Akinbowale, O.L.; Peng, H.; Barton, M.D. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from aquaculture sources in Australia. J Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schmidt, A.S.; Bruun, M.S.; Dalsgaard, I.; Pedersen, K.; Larsen, J.L. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fish-pathogenic and environmental bacteria associated with four Danish rainbow trout farms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4908–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Xiong, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ding, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Zeng, Z. Antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and bacterial community composition in fresh water aquaculture environment in China. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Burgos-Aceves, M.A.; Lionetti, L.; Faggio, C. Multidisciplinary haematology as prognostic device in environmental and xenobiotic stress-induced response in fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 1170–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bojarski, B.; Witeska, M. Blood biomarkers of herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide toxicity to fish—A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 19236–19250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dobsikova, R.; Blahova, J.; Mikulikova, I.; Modra, H.; Praskova, E.; Svobodova, Z.; Skoric, M.; Jarkovsky, J.; Siwicki, A.K. The effect of oyster mushroom b-1.3/1.6-D-glucan and oxytetracycline antibiotic on biometrical, haematological, biochemical, and immunological indices, and histopathological changes in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 1813–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. El-Adawy, M.; Abd El-Aziz, M.; El-Shazly, K.; Ali, N.G.; Abu El-Magd, M. Dietary propionic acid enhances antibacterial and immunomodulatory effects of oxytetracycline on Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 34200–34211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hoseini, S.M.; Yousefi, M. Beneficial effects of thyme (Thymus vulgaris) extract on oxytetracyclineinduced stress response, immunosuppression, oxidative stress and enzymatic changes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquacult. Nutr. 2019, 25, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Omoregie, E.; Oyebani, S.M. Oxytetracycline-induced blood disorder in juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Trewavas). J. World Aquacult. Soc. 2002, 33, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Reda, R.M.; Mahmoud, R.; Selim, K.M.; El-Araby, I.E. Effects of dietary acidifiers on growth, hematology, immune response and disease resistance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 50, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Serezli, R.; Cagirgan, H. The effect of oxytetracycline on non-specific immune response in sea bream (Sparus aurata L. 1758). Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2005, 29, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  88. Nakano, T.; Hayashi, S.; Nagamine, N. Effect of excessive doses of oxytetracycline on stress-related biomarker expression in coho salmon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 7121–7128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reda, R.M.; Ibrahim, R.E.; Ahmed, E.-N.G.; El-Bouhy, Z.M. Effect of oxytetracycline and florfenicol as growth promoters on the health status of cultured Oreochromis niloticus. Egypt J. Aquat. Res. 2013, 39, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Chen, C.-Y.; Wooster, G.A.; Bowser, P.R. Comparative blood chemistry and histopathology of tilapia infected with Vibrio vulnificus or Streptococcus iniae or exposed to carbon tetrachloride, gentamicin, or copper sulfate. Aquaculture 2004, 239, 421–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ni, H.; Peng, L.; Gao, X.; Ji, H.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, S. Effects of maduramicin on adult zebrafish (Danio rerio): Acute toxicity, tissue damage and oxidative stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 168, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Elia, A.C.; Ciccotelli, V.; Pacini, N.; Dorr, A.J.M.; Gili, M.; Natali, M.; Gasco, L.; Prearo, M.; Abete, M.C. Transferability of oxytetracycline (OTC) from feed to carp muscle and evaluation of the antibiotic effects on antioxidant systems in liver and kidney. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 40, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Limbu, S.M.; Zhang, H.; Luo, Y.; Chen, L.-Q.; Zhang, M. High carbohydrate diet partially protects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) from oxytetracycline-induced side effects. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bojarski, B.; Jakubiak, M.; Bień, M.; Batoryna, M.; Formicki, G.; Socha, M.; Drąg-Kozak, E.; Tombarkiewicz, B. Assessment of gentamicin effect on oxidoreductive balance and microstructure of trunk kidney in Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio). Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. SGGW Anim. Sci. 2019, 58, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Jones, J.; Kinnel, M.; Christenson, R.; Reimschuessel, R. Gentamicin concentrations in toadfish and goldfish serum. J Aquat. Anim. Health 1997, 9, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Silva de Oliveira, R.C.; Oliveira, R.; Carvalho Rodrigues, M.A.; Oliveira de Farias, N.; Sousa-Moura, D.; Almeida Nunes, N.; Andrade, T.S.; Koppe Grisola, C. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of nitrofurantoin on zebrafish early-life stages. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nogueira, A.F.; Pinto, G.; Correia, B.; Nunes, B. Embryonic development, locomotor behavior, biochemical, and epigenetic effects of the pharmaceutical drugs paracetamol and ciprofloxacin in larvae and embryos of Danio rerio when exposed to environmental realistic levels of both drugs. Environ. Toxicol. 2019, 34, 1177–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bojarski, B.; Jakubiak, M.; Witeska, M. Physiological and histological effects of herbicides in fish. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. SGGW 2018, 57, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rodrigues, S.; Antunes, S.C.; Nunes, B.; Correia, A.T. Histological alterations in gills and liver of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after exposure to the antibiotic oxytetracycline. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 53, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Islam, M.J.; Rasul, M.G.; Kashem, M.A.; Hossain, M.M.; Liza, A.A.; Sayeed, M.A.; Motaher Hossain, M. Effect of oxytetracycline on Thai silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) and on it’s culture environment. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2015, 10, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Rodrigues, S.; Antunes, S.C.; Nunes, B.; Correia, A.T. Histopathological effects of the antibiotic erythromycin on the freshwater fish species Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 181, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Augusto, J.; Smith, B.; Smith, S.; Robertson, J.; Reimschuessel, R. Gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity and nephroneogenesis in Oreochromis nilotica, a tilapian fish. Dis. Aquat. Org. 1996, 26, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Reimschuessel, R.; Chamie, S.J.; Kinnel, M. Evaluation of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicosis in toadfish. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1996, 209, 137–139. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Reimschuessel, R.; Williams, D. Development of new nephrons in adult kidneys following gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. Renal Failure 1995, 17, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Salice, C.J.; Rokous, J.S.; Kane, A.S.; Reimschuessel, R. New nephron development in goldfish (Carassius auratus) kidneys following repeated gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicosis. Comp. Med. 2001, 51, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  106. Marking, L.L.; Howe, G.E.; Crowther, J.R. Toxicity of erythromycin, oxytetracycline and tetracycline administered to lake trout in water baths, by injection, or by feeding. Prog. Fish-Cult. 1988, 50, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Robinson, A.A.; Belden, J.B.; Lydy, M.J. Toxicity of fluoroquinolone antibiotics to aquatic organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Carraschi, S.P.; Shiogiri, N.S.; Venturini, F.P.; da Cruz, C.; Girio, A.C.F.; Machado Neto, J.G. Acute toxicity and environmental risk of oxytetracycline and florfenicol antibiotics to pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Biol. Inst. Pesca Sao Paulo 2011, 37, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  109. Martins, N.; Pereira, R.; Abrantes, N.; Pereira, J.; Goncalves, F.; Marques, C.R. Ecotoxicological effects of ciprofloxacin on freshwater species: Data integration and derivation of toxicity thresholds for risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Almeida, A.R.; Tacao, M.; Machado, A.L.; Golovko, O.; Zlabek, V.; Domingues, I.; Henriques, I. Long-term effects of oxytetracycline exposure in zebrafish: A multi-level perspective. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Botelho, R.G.; Christofoletti, C.A.; Correia, J.E.; Ansoar, Y.; Olinda, R.A.; Tornisielo, V.L. Genotoxic responses of juvenile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to florfenicol and oxytetracycline. Chemosphere 2015, 132, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rodrigues, S.; Antunes, S.C.; Correia, A.T.; Nunes, B. Oxytetracycline effects in specific biochemical pathways of detoxification, neurotransmission and energy production in Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 164, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhou, L.; Limbu, S.M.; Shen, M.; Zhai, W.; Qiao, F.; He, A.; Du, Z.-Y.; Zhang, M. Environmental concentrations of antibiotics impair zebrafish gut health. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 235, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, J.; Yin, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Reproductive toxicity of β-diketone antibiotic mixtures to zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 141, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Grondel, J.L.; Gloudermans, A.G.M.; van Muiswinkel, W.B. The influence of antibiotics on the immune system. II. Modulation of fish leukocyte response in culture. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1985, 9, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rijkers, G.T.; Teunissen, A.G.; van Oosterom, R.; van Muiswinkel, W.B. The immune system of cyprinid fish. The immunosuppressive effect of the antibiotic oxytetracycline in carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture 1980, 19, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Maklakova, M.E.; Kondratieva, I.A.; Mikhailova, E.S.; Stupin, R.V.; Khapchaev, S.Y.; Kasumyan, A.O. Effect of antibiotics on immunophysiological status and their taste attractiveness for rainbow trout Parasalmo (=Oncorhynchus) mykiss (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae). J. Ichthyol. 2011, 51, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kim, J.; Oh, H.; Ryu, B.; Kim, U.; Lee, J.M.; Jung, C.-R.; Kim, C.-Y.; Park, J.-H. Triclosan affects axon formation in the neural development stages of zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio). Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yan, Z.; Huang, X.; Xie, Y.; Song, M.; Zhu, K.; Ding, S. Macrolides induce severe cardiotoxicity and developmental toxicity in zabrafish embryos. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shen, R.; Yu, Y.; Lan, R.; Yu, R.; Yuan, Z.; Xia, Z. The cardiovascular toxicity induced by high doses of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in zebrafish. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 112861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bojarski, B.; Kot, B.; Witeska, M. Antibacterials in Aquatic Environment and Their Toxicity to Fish. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13080189

AMA Style

Bojarski B, Kot B, Witeska M. Antibacterials in Aquatic Environment and Their Toxicity to Fish. Pharmaceuticals. 2020; 13(8):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13080189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bojarski, Bartosz, Barbara Kot, and Małgorzata Witeska. 2020. "Antibacterials in Aquatic Environment and Their Toxicity to Fish" Pharmaceuticals 13, no. 8: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13080189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop