Next Article in Journal
Engineered Peptides Enable Biomimetic Route for Collagen Intrafibrillar Mineralization
Next Article in Special Issue
Cytogenetics Meets Genomics: Cytotaxonomy and Genomic Relationships among Color Variants of the Asian Arowana Scleropages formosus
Previous Article in Journal
Route of Arsenic Exposure Differentially Impacts the Expression of Genes Involved in Gut-Mucosa-Associated Immune Responses and Gastrointestinal Permeability
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms24076332
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

LTR Retroelements and Bird Adaptation to Arid Environments

by
Elisa Carotti
†,
Edith Tittarelli
†,
Adriana Canapa
,
Maria Assunta Biscotti
,
Federica Carducci
* and
Marco Barucca
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6332; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076332
Submission received: 26 January 2023 / Revised: 16 March 2023 / Accepted: 24 March 2023 / Published: 28 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights on Vertebrate Repetitive DNA)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
TEs are known to be among the main drivers in genome evolution, leading to the generation of evolutionary advantages that favor the success of organisms. The aim of this work was to investigate the TE landscape in bird genomes to look for a possible relationship between the amount of specific TE types and environmental changes that characterized the Oligocene era in Australia. Therefore, the mobilome of 29 bird species, belonging to a total of 11 orders, was analyzed. Our results confirmed that LINE retroelements are not predominant in all species of this evolutionary lineage and highlighted an LTR retroelement dominance in species with an Australian-related evolutionary history. The bird LTR retroelement expansion might have happened in response to the Earth’s dramatic climate changes that occurred about 30 Mya, followed by a progressive aridification across most of Australian landmasses. Therefore, in birds, LTR retroelement burst might have represented an evolutionary advantage in the adaptation to arid/drought environments.

1. Introduction

Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA sequences capable of replicating, moving, and integrating into new regions of the genome [1]. Two major classes can be identified according to their mode of transposition: retrotransposons (class I) and DNA transposons (class II). Class I TEs are able to propagate their copy sequences in the host genome by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate molecule through a copy-and-paste mechanism. Elements of class I include long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons and non-LTR retrotransposons. The latter encompass long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs). Class II elements are generally removed from their original location in order to be inserted in a different portion of the genome by a cut-and-paste mechanism [1].
TEs play a key role in the response of genome to external stimuli, being activated by biotic and abiotic factors. Their activation might be due to impaired functionality of TE silencing mechanisms (e.g., RNA interference by piRNAs and/or DNA methylation), resulting in the consequent acceleration of genetic variability and genome reshaping, leading species to adapt rapidly to new conditions [2]. Therefore, TE activity-mediated response of species to environmental stressors such as variations in temperature, humidity, and salinity could facilitate adaptation to climate changes and species radiation [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. This dynamic interplay between TEs and the environment has been well reported for plant and Drosophila [11,12,13], while this issue has only recently been covered in vertebrates [14,15,16,17].
Birds have small genome sizes (0.89 Gb in the black-chinned hummingbird to 2.11 Gb in the ostrich) [18,19,20], similar to other flying organisms (bats and pterosaurs) [21,22,23] that have convergently evolved constricted genome sizes [22]. Their genomes are known to contain lower levels of TEs (~4 to 10%) [24], with the exception of woodpeckers in which they make up 20% [20,25,26,27]. Moreover, bird genomes are characterized by a low diversity of TE superfamilies mainly belonging to LINEs, followed by LTR retroelements, DNA transposons, and SINEs. With 39–88% of all TE copies, chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements, belonging to non-LTR retroelements, are the dominant TE subfamily in birds. The long-term stability in genome size observed in these endothermic organisms is due to the balance between the rate of DNA gain through transposition and that of DNA loss, the so-called “accordion” model of genome evolution [20].
The modern birds, or Neornithes, are a monophyletic group including Palaeognathae and Neognathae [28], originating from the Palaeocene (65 Mya) after the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) transition [29]. Australia has played a key role in bird radiation as most extant birds can reconduct their evolutionary history to this continent [30]. It has always been considered the landmass with the largest and most fascinating biodiversity due to its long period of isolation after separation from Antarctica, estimated in the late Eocene (35 Mya) [31]. Significant ecological, geological, and climatic events have contributed to the current subdivision of the Australian continent into different biomes that are currently classified according to the Köppen-Geiger climate type system in three main climates: tropical (8.3%), arid (77.8%), and temperate (13.9%) [32]. These features have contributed to the development of the surprising Australian biology characterized by flora and fauna, having unique characteristics and a high level of endemism on a regional and continental scale. Moreover, Australia presents an interesting biogeography of species whose distribution extends from temperate to tropical zones [33].
The aim of this work was to investigate if a correlation exists between the TE type content in bird genomes and the environmental changes occurred in Australia during Oligocene (33 Mya). Therefore, the TE fraction of 29 bird species belonging to a total of 11 orders was analyzed through a bioinformatic approach (Figure 1 and Table 1).

2. Results

The genomes of seven Australian birds, along with 22 species living in other geographical areas, belonging to a total of 11 orders, were masked to investigate the composition of their repetitive fraction. The total TE percentage was lower than 10 for most of the analyzed species. It was noteworthy that the TE quantity identified in the two species belonging to Piciformes exceeded 25% (Figure 2). In Figure 3, the relative abundance of each TE type was reported. Overall, the major impact was represented by LINE retroelements, including four Australian species. Interestingly, for the other three species living in Australia, namely M. undulatus, T. guttata, and D. novaehollandiae, LTR retroelements showed the highest relative abundance. This finding was shared also by M. monachus, distributed in South America, and H. rustica, having a worldwide distribution. Moreover, patterns evidenced by TE relative abundance analysis were not consistent with species taxonomy (Figure 3), as also supported by the variation partitioning analysis (Figure 4). For 11 species, chromosome-level genome assemblies were not present in public repositories. In these cases, the masking analysis of genome repetitive fraction was performed on available scaffolds. In order to verify a possible bias due to assembly quality, comparisons of TE content were carried out on 14 species for which both scaffold and chromosome data were available (Supplementary Figure S1, Tables S1 and S2). In general, the percentage of total TEs obtained for scaffolds was on average underestimated by 17.8%. Concerning the two most abundant TE types (LINE and LTR retroelements), compared to total TEs, LINE retroelements showed an average variation of 6.6%, while LTR retroelements showed 4.8%. In the latter, the variation always represented an underestimation of LTR content obtained by analyzing scaffold assemblies. Therefore, the extent of these discrepancies suggested that patterns of TE type detected for species with only available scaffolds are likely to be reliable. In D. novaehollandiae, the difference in TE content obtained by analyzing the chromosome and scaffold assemblies was high, suggesting low reliability of the scaffold-level genome assembly. Hence, data relating to this species were not considered. In the latter, about 68% of TEs were not masked, probably due to low assembly quality of regions harboring these repetitive elements.
Genomic TE sequence divergence was analyzed using Kimura distance method (Supplementary Figure S2). In Figure 5, Kimura landscapes were reported for Passeriformes (passerines), Psittaciformes (parrots), and Palaeognathae (ratites and tinamous), taxa that have species with an abundance of LTR retroelements.
In the case of Passeriformes (Figure 5, panel A), all the considered species showed amplification bursts of LTR retroelements. However, P. domesticus and F. albicollis showed an intense expansion of LINE retroelements, leading the latter TE type to be the most abundant in their genomes. Additionally, T. guttata experienced a LINE burst, although LTR retroelements remained the most prevalent TE type. Concerning Psittaciformes, M. undulatus and M. monachus presented TE amplifications dominated by LTR retroelements. Despite a recent LTR burst, the A. aestiva genome showed a prevalence of LINE retroelements due to an amplification of these mobile elements, as revealed by the Kimura landscape (Figure 5, panel B). Bursts characterized by a dominance of LTR retroelements were not recorded for S. habroptila. Among Palaeognathae, D. novaehollandiae was the only species showing a remarkable LTR amplification burst (Figure 5, panel C). Moreover, T. guttata, M. undulatus, and D. novaehollandiae landscapes showed recent and active DNA transposon elements.

3. Discussion

In this paper, we investigated the TE landscape in bird genomes to understand if a correlation exists between the amount of specific TE types and environmental changes that characterized the Oligocene era in Australia. Our results confirmed the idea that LINE retroelements are not predominant in all species of this evolutionary lineage [20,34]. Indeed, five of the 29 analyzed species showed a dominance of LTR retroelements, and interestingly, all of them belong to Australian species or to taxa with an Australian ancestor. M. undulatus, T. guttata, and D. novaehollandiae are widely distributed in the Australian landmass. M. monachus lives in Eastern South America; however, similar to M. undulatus, it belongs to parrots that diversified from an Australian ancestor [35]. Our analyses showed the presence of a high LTR retroelement amount in the genome of a fifth species, H. rustica. This species has a worldwide distribution but, similar to T. guttata, it belongs to Passeriformes, an order that also had an Australian origin [30]. Moreover, the ancestors of these species arose in the same time window, about 30 Mya in Oligocene. During the transition from Eocene to Oligocene, the Earth was affected by strong climate changes leading to a dramatic global cooling that determined mass extinction as well as species diversification [36,37]. In the Australian continent, these events caused the progressive rainforest reduction and an increase of aridification. Although some species went extinct, other taxa increased diversification rates and adapted to new niches [36]. Since TEs can be activated in response to environmental stress conditions [3,8,14,15,16], the amplification of LTR retroelements in the species analyzed here might have represented an evolutionary advantage (Figure 6).
Phylogenetic studies [38,39] have highlighted a large evolutionary distance between the taxa exhibiting an LTR retroelement prevalence, leading to the hypothesis that the expansion of these TEs occurred independently in bird lineages. This observation is also supported by variation partitioning analysis, which revealed a better correlation between LTR retroelement content and climate changes that occurred in Australia and Antarctica during the Eocene-Oligocene transition than the phylogeny of the species analyzed. In plants, LTR retroelements have been reported to be activated under drought stress conditions [40,41,42], and in animals, a prevalence of these TE elements has been identified in the genome of the genus Camelus adapted to arid environments [43]. In support of our hypothesis, Australian species living in temperate and tropical regions, such as P. strigoides, A. lathami, and P. torquatus (Figure 7), showed a limited fraction of LTR retroelements and a strong prevalence of LINE retroelements, as reported also for the C. casuarius genome. This species is strictly related to D. novaehollandiae, and they diverged from a common ancestor during Oligocene [44]. It is distributed in New Guinea and in York Peninsula (far North Queensland, Australia), which agrees with Moyle et al. (2016) [30] that proposed New Guinea as a refuge for relictual lineages, restricted to the Australian northern continental margin after the progression of aridification (Figure 7).
Other species belonging to Palaeognathae, such as S. camelus australis and R. americana, which diverged from Casuariiformes (C. casuarius and D. novaehollandiae) before the Oligocene, also showed a prevalence of LINE retroelement. This finding corroborates the hypothesis that the LTR retroelement expansion was specific to bird ancestors that lived in Australia during this geological era. Regarding parrots, the LINE retroelement dominance in S. habroptila, an endemic species of New Zealand, might be explained by the early divergence of its ancestor from that of the other analyzed parrots, which occurred during Eocene [45]. Moreover, New Zealand was not affected by the remarkable climate changes that characterized Australia in the Oligocene (Figure 7). Concerning the two parrots living in South America, A. aestiva mobilome showed a prevalence of LINE retroelements, while LTR retroelements were dominant in M. monachus. Their ancestors migrated to Antarctica before the separation of this continent from Australia, which was dated around 55–45 Mya [46]. Subsequently, the ancestor of Amazona evolutionary lineage probably colonized South America before that of Myiopsitta (Figure 6). The diploid chromosome number of 2 n = 48 described for M. monachus represents an exception among the South American Psittacidae (which are generally 2 n = 70) [47]. This atypical karyotype might support the hypothesis of a diverse origin for this species. The LTR retroelement expansion observed in Myiopsitta might have occurred in its ancestor, which lived in Antarctica, in response to the aridification that characterized this landmass in the Oligocene. Moreover, this parrot retained an LTR retroelement abundance that might have favored its current distribution in arid areas. In contrast, the A. aestiva ancestor, which was already present in South America, was not affected by the climate stress conditions that were happening in the Antarctic and Australian landmasses starting from the Oligocene. Alternatively, if A. aestiva and M. monachus originated from a common ancestor that migrated from Antarctica to South America, their different TE composition might be explained by considering the recurrent chromosome reshuffling events that are typical of parrot genomes [48].
In the case of Passeriformes, the analyzed species had a common ancestor that lived in Australia during the Oligocene [35]. Indeed, it is known that passerines dispersed from Australia via South-East Asia ca. 23 Mya [30]. This observation could explain the LTR retroelement bursts observed in the Kimura landscapes of species analyzed here. However, only T. guttata and H. rustica maintained a prevalence of LTR retroelements: for T. guttata this condition might be due to its wide distribution in Australia and mainly in arid environments; for H. rustica this feature might have been at the base of its wide adaptability to different environments, which led to its current worldwide distribution. The LTR retroelement decrease observed in the other analyzed Passeriformes might be the result of a balance between the rate of DNA gains through transposition and that of DNA loss, as proposed in the “accordion” model of bird genome evolution [20].
Interestingly, the species T. guttata, M. undulatus, and D. novaehollandiae presented active DNA transposons. It is known that in vertebrates, these elements are usually defective and thus not active. Indeed, according to the evolutionary life-cycle of DNA transposons, after host genome invasion, these elements undergo bursts of amplification. In this phase, DNA transposons are prone to accumulate mutations that make them inactive. This process is called vertical inactivation [49,50]. Therefore, the DNA transposons identified in these three bird species might be in the initial phase of this cycle. The presence of DNA transposon active copies even in other bird species not correlated with Australia (Supplementary Figure S2) suggests that this trait is not linked to climate events that occurred from Oligocene in this landmass.

4. Materials and Methods

In this study, 29 bird species belonging to 11 orders were considered (Table 1). Unmasked genomes of these species were obtained from the public database NCBI GenBank (https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/, accessed on 13 January 2022) and ENSEMBL (https://www.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 13 January 2022). Accession numbers and genome assembly levels were reported in Supplementary Table S1. To identify TEs in the considered species and create the species-specific de novo TE libraries, we followed the pipeline developed by Carotti et al., 2021 [16]. Using RepeatScout v 1.0.6 [51], de novo TEs were identified: the “build_lmer_table” module generated a table of lmer frequency and “RepeatScout” extracted the repeats that were then filtered with “filter-stage-1.prl” script in order to remove low complexity sequences. This step allows generating the “build_lmer_table” that was then used by RepeatMasker v 4.1.0 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/cgi-bin/WEBRepeatMasker, accessed on 13 January 2022) as a library to extract the repeat sequences. Those repeats accounted for less than 10 times were removed by RepeatScout “filter-stage-2.prl” script. Additional filtering steps were performed to remove sequences that were not identified as TEs. Briefly, applying a threshold e-value of 1 × 10−50, BLASTX [52] search against the Uniprot–Swissprot database [53] and Interproscan v5.34–73.0 [54] were performed. Among discarded elements, possible domesticated transposons filtered out in the previous step were searched by HMMER [55]. Sequences containing domains ascribable to integrase, reverse transcriptase, and transposase with e-value lower than 1 × 10−5 were reintegrated in the TE library. As the last step, the remaining sequences were classified using TEclass-2.13 (https://www.bioinformatics.uni-muenster.de/tools/teclass/index.hbi?, accessed on 13 January 2022) to obtain the specie-specific TE libraries. These were used by RepeatMasker to mask each genome specifying the “-a” argument in the command line. In addition, the scripts “calcDivergenceFromAlign.pl” and “createRepeatLandscape.pl”, included in the RepeatMasker package, were applied to estimate TE divergence and transposition history in bird genomes. Kimura distances (rate of transitions and transversions) were calculated between TE sequences identified in the genome and TE consensus from the library.
To evaluate whether the LTR retroelement predominance observed in some of the analyzed species was related to climate changes that occurred in Australia and Antarctica during the Eocene-Oligocene transition (explanatory variable X1) or to phylogenetic relationships (explanatory variable X2), a variation partitioning analysis was performed using the vegan package 2.5.5 [56]. For each pair of the 28 species considered in the analysis, both explanatory variables were compared with data related to the difference between the LTR retroelement relative abundances (assigned as response variable X). To set the explanatory variable X1, D. novaehollandiae (Casuariiformes), F. albicollis, H. rustica, P. domesticus, and T. guttata (Passeriformes), and A. aestiva, M. monachus, and M. undulatus (Psittaciformes) were considered as species showing an ancestor that probably experienced an LTR expansion as a consequence of the aforementioned climate changes. For the explanatory variable X2, phylogenetic distances were evaluated using the 16S rDNA p-distance matrix (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Note that C. europaeus was not included in the analysis due to the lack of 16S rDNA sequence in public databases.

5. Conclusions

Our results could constitute further evidence that TEs have been active players in bird genome evolution, favoring their adaptation. Although the major part of the bird mobilome is constituted by LINE retroelements, our findings highlighted an LTR retroelement dominance in species with an Australian-related evolutionary history. Indeed, these lineages underwent a radiation about 30 Mya when Earth’s climate was destabilized by dramatic changes, and Australia started to experience progressive aridification across most of its landmasses. The bird LTR retroelement expansion might have represented an evolutionary advantage in the adaptation to arid/drought environments, in line with that reported in other species [40,41,42,43]. It is known that LTR retroelements can control the transcription of host gene by inserting cis-regulatory sequences such as enhancers, promoters, and insulators [57,58]. Therefore, these mobile elements can modify the transcriptional activity of neighboring host genes leading to short-term adaptation of physiological functions in response to environmental changes and long-term evolutionary changes [58]. Further investigations will be useful to explore through what cis regulatory activity LTR retroelements might have contributed to the adaptability of birds to environmental changes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24076332/s1.

Author Contributions

Methodology and data analysis, E.T., E.C. and F.C.; conceptualization, A.C., M.A.B. and M.B.; project supervision and project administration, M.B.; E.C., E.T., A.C., M.A.B., F.C. and M.B. discussed the results, wrote the manuscript, and commented the final version of the manuscript prior to submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Accession numbers of analyzed data are contained in Supplementary Tables S1–S3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wicker, T.; Sabot, F.; Hua-Van, A.; Bennetzen, J.L.; Capy, P.; Chalhoub, B.; Flavell, A.; Leroy, P.; Morgante, M.; Panaud, O.; et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schrader, L.; Smith, J. The impact of transposable elements in adaptive evolution. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 1537–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pappalardo, A.M.; Ferrito, V.; Biscotti, M.A.; Canapa, A.; Capriglione, T. Transposable elements and stress in vertebrates: An overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Canapa, A.; Biscotti, M.A.; Barucca, M.; Carducci, F.; Carotti, E.; Olmo, E. Shedding light upon the complex net of genome size, genome composition and environment in chordates. Eur. Zool. J. 2020, 87, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Carducci, F.; Barucca, M.; Canapa, A.; Carotti, E.; Biscotti, M.A. Mobile Elements in Ray-Finned Fish Genomes. Life 2020, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Biscotti, M.A.; Carducci, F.; Olmo, E.; Canapa, A. Vertebrate genome size and the impact of transposable elements in genome evolution. In Evolution, Origin of Life, Concepts and Methods; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 233–251. [Google Scholar]
  7. Carducci, F.; Biscotti, M.A.; Barucca, M.; Canapa, A. Transposable elements in vertebrates: Species evolution and environmental adaptation. Eur. Zool. J. 2019, 86, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Canapa, A.; Barucca, M.; Biscotti, M.A.; Forconi, M.; Olmo, E. Transposons, genome size, and evolutionary insights in animals. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2015, 147, 217–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chénais, B.; Caruso, A.; Hiard, S.; Casse, N. The impact of transposable elements on eukaryotic genomes: From genome size increase to genetic adaptation to stressful environments. Gene 2012, 509, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Casacuberta, E.; González, J. The impact of transposable elements in environmental adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 6, 1503–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Makarevitch, I.; Waters, A.J.; West, P.T.; Stitzer, M.; Hirsch, C.N.; Ross-Ibarra, J.; Springer, N.M. Transposable elements contribute to activation of maize genes in response to abiotic stress. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1004915. [Google Scholar]
  12. Piacentini, L.; Fanti, L.; Specchia, V.; Bozzetti, M.P.; Berloco, M.; Palumbo, G.; Pimpinelli, S. Transposons, environmental changes, and heritable induced phenotypic variability. Chromosoma 2014, 123, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Fujino, K.; Hashida, S.N.; Ogawa, T.; Natsume, T.; Uchiyama, T.; Mikami, T.; Kishima, Y. Temperature controls nuclear import of Tam3 transposase in Antirrhinum. Plant J. 2011, 65, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Carotti, E.; Carducci, F.; Canapa, A.; Barucca, M.; Biscotti, M.A. Transposable element tissue-specific response to temperature stress in the stenothermal fish Puntius tetrazona. Animals 2023, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carotti, E.; Carducci, F.; Greco, S.; Gerdol, M.; Di Marino, D.; Perta, N.; La Teana, A.; Canapa, A.; Barucca, M.; Biscotti, M.A. Transcriptional contribution of transposable elements in relation to salinity conditions in teleosts and silencing mechanisms involved. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carotti, E.; Carducci, F.; Canapa, A.; Barucca, M.; Greco, S.; Gerdol, M.; Biscotti, M.A. Transposable elements and teleost migratory behaviour. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Carducci, F.; Biscotti, M.A.; Forconi, M.; Barucca, M.; Canapa, A. An intriguing relationship between teleost Rex3 retroelement and environmental temperature. Biol. Lett. 2019, 15, 20190279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gregory, T.R.; Nicol, J.A.; Tamm, H.; Kullman, B.; Kullman, K.; Leitch, I.J.; Murray, B.G.; Kapraun, D.F.; Greilhuber, J.; Bennett, M.D. Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wright, N.A.; Gregory, T.R.; Witt, C.C. Metabolic ’engines’ of flight drive genome size reduction in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20132780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kapusta, A.; Suh, A.; Feschotte, C. Dynamics of genome size evolution in birds and mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1460–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hughes, A.L.; Hughes, M.K. Small genomes for better flyers. Nature 1995, 377, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Organ, C.L.; Shedlock, A.M. Palaeogenomics of pterosaurs and the evolution of small genome size in flying vertebrates. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Smith, J.D.L.; Gregory, T.R. The genome sizes of megabats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) are remarkably constrained. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, G.; Li, C.; Li, Q.; Li, B.; Larkin, D.M.; Lee, C.; Storz, J.F.; Antunes, A.; Greenwold, M.J.; Meredith, R.W.; et al. Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 2014, 346, 1311–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hruska, J.P.; Manthey, J.D. De novo assembly of a chromosome-scale reference genome for the northern flicker Colaptes auratus. G3 2021, 11, jkaa026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Manthey, J.D.; Moyle, R.G.; Boissinot, S. Multiple and independent phases of transposable element amplification in the genomes of Piciformes (Woodpeckers and Allies). Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sotero-Caio, C.G.; Platt, R.N., II; Suh, A.; Ray, D.A. Evolution and diversity of transposable elements in vertebrate genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cracraft, J. Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feduccia, A. Explosive evolution in tertiary birds and mammals. Science 1995, 267, 637–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moyle, R.G.; Oliveros, C.H.; Andersen, M.J.; Hosner, P.A.; Benz, B.W.; Manthey, J.D.; Travers, S.L.; Brown, R.M.; Faircloth, B.C. Tectonic collision and uplift of Wallacea triggered the global songbird radiation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cracraft, J. Continental drift, paleoclimatology, and the evolution and biogeography of birds. J. Zool. 1973, 169, 455–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peel, M.C.; Finlayson, B.L.; McMahon, T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Common, M.S.; Norton, T.W. Biodiversity: Its Conservation in Australia. Ambio 1992, 21, 258–265. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chalopin, D.; Naville, M.; Plard, F.; Galiana, D.; Volff, J.-N. Comparative analysis of transposable elements highlights mobilome diversity and evolution in vertebrates. Genome Biol. Evol. 2015, 7, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oliveros, C.H.; Field, D.J.; Ksepka, D.T.; Barker, F.K.; Aleixo, A.; Andersen, M.J.; Alström, P.; Benz, B.W.; Braun, E.L.; Braun, M.J.; et al. Earth history and the passerine superradiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7916–7925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Owen, C.L.; Marshall, D.C.; Hill, K.B.R.; Simon, C. How the aridification of Australia structured the biogeography and influenced the diversification of a large lineage of Australian cicadas. Syst. Biol. 2017, 66, 569–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brennan, I.G.; Oliver, P.M. Mass turnover and recovery dynamics of a diverse Australian continental radiation. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 2017, 71, 1352–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kuhl, H.; Frankl-Vilches, C.; Bakker, A.; Mayr, G.; Nikolaus, G.; Boerno, S.T.; Klages, S.; Timmermann, B.; Gahr, M. An Unbiased Molecular Approach Using 3’-UTRs Resolves the Avian Family-Level Tree of Life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 108–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Claramunt, S.; Cracraft, J. A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1501005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ito, H. How to activate heat-responsible retrotransposon ONSEN in Brassicaceae species. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2250, 189–194. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jiao, Y.; Deng, X.W. A genome-wide transcriptional activity survey of rice transposable element-related genes. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lopes, F.R.; Jjingo, D.; da Silva, C.R.; Andrade, A.C.; Marraccini, P.; Teixeira, J.B.; Carazzolle, M.F.; Pereira, G.A.; Pereira, L.F.; Vanzela, A.L.; et al. Transcriptional activity, chromosomal distribution and expression effects of transposable elements in Coffea genomes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ibrahim, M.A.; Al-Shomrani, B.M.; Simenc, M.; Alharbi, S.N.; Alqahtani, F.H.; Al-Fageeh, M.B.; Manee, M.M. Comparative analysis of transposable elements provides insights into genome evolution in the genus Camelus. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yonezawa, T.; Segawa, T.; Mori, H.; Campos, P.F.; Hongoh, Y.; Endo, H.; Akiyoshi, A.; Kohno, N.; Nishida, S.; Wu, J. Phylogenomics and morphology of extinct paleognaths reveal the origin and evolution of the ratites. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fänger, H. Avitaxonomicon Website. 2023. Available online: https://www.bird-phylogeny.de (accessed on 13 January 2022).
  46. Tavares, E.S.; Baker, A.J.; Pereira, S.L.; Miyaki, C.Y. Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of neotropical parrots (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae: Arini) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55, 454–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Furo, I.O.; Kretschmer, R.; O’Brien, P.C.; Pereira, J.C.; Garnero, A.D.V.; Gunski, R.J.; O’Connor, R.E.; Griffin, D.K.; Gomes, A.J.B.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; et al. Chromosomal evolution in the phylogenetic context: A remarkable karyotype reorganization in neotropical parrot Myiopsitta monachus (psittacidae). Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, Z.; De O Furo, I.; Liu, J.; Peona, V.; Gomes, A.J.B.; Cen, W.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, D.; Xue, T.; et al. Recurrent chromosome reshuffling and the evolution of neo-sex chromosomes in parrots. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miskey, C.; Izsvák, Z.; Kawakami, K.; Ivics, Z. DNA transposons in vertebrate functional genomics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lohe, A.R.; Moriyama, E.N.; Lidholm, D.A.; Hartl, D.L. Horizontal trasmission, vertical inactivation, and stochastuc loss of mariner-like transable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995, 12, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Price, A.L.; Jones, N.C.; Pevzner, P.A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. The UniProt Consortium UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D506–D515. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.-Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W29–W37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Oksanen, J.; Guillaume Blanchet, F.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.5–5. 2019. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 10 May 2020).
  57. Sundaram, V.; Wysocka, J. Transposable elements as a potent source of diverse cis-regulatory sequences in mammalian genomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 375, 20190347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Moschetti, R.; Palazzo, A.; Lorusso, P.; Viggiano, L.; Massimiliano Marsano, R. “What You Need, Baby, I Got It”: Transposable elements as suppliers of cis-operating sequences in Drosophila. Biology 2020, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 06332 g001 550
Figure 1. Species considered in this study and their geographical distribution are shown. The landmasses are colored as follow: North and Central America in dark green; South America in light green; Africa in yellow; Antarctica in blue; Europe-Asia in orange; Australia in magenta; Indonesia and New Guinea in pink; New Zealand in purple. The colored square boxes indicate the geographical distribution of each species analyzed in this study.
Figure 1. Species considered in this study and their geographical distribution are shown. The landmasses are colored as follow: North and Central America in dark green; South America in light green; Africa in yellow; Antarctica in blue; Europe-Asia in orange; Australia in magenta; Indonesia and New Guinea in pink; New Zealand in purple. The colored square boxes indicate the geographical distribution of each species analyzed in this study.
Ijms 24 06332 g001
Ijms 24 06332 g002 550
Figure 2. The percentage of total transposable elements (TEs) masked in the genomes of the studied species. The histogram displays the percentage of the main TE types. * indicates species for which the analysis was performed on scaffold-level genome assembly.
Figure 2. The percentage of total transposable elements (TEs) masked in the genomes of the studied species. The histogram displays the percentage of the main TE types. * indicates species for which the analysis was performed on scaffold-level genome assembly.
Ijms 24 06332 g002
Ijms 24 06332 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative abundance of TE types in the mobilome of the bird species analyzed. * indicates species for which the analysis was performed on scaffold-level genome assembly.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of TE types in the mobilome of the bird species analyzed. * indicates species for which the analysis was performed on scaffold-level genome assembly.
Ijms 24 06332 g003
Ijms 24 06332 g004 550
Figure 4. Venn diagrams obtained by the variation partitioning analysis (VPA) using redundancy analysis (RDA). The partition of the variation of a response variable (X) between two sets of explanatory variables (X1 and X2) is shown. Each circle represents the portion of variation accounting for each explanatory variable or a combination of the explanatory matrices. The intersection between the two circles represents the amount of variation explained by both variables X1 and X2. The response variable (X) is the difference between the LTR retroelements relative abundances; the explanatory variable X1 represents species that have an ancestor that probably experienced an LTR expansion as consequence of climate changes that occurred in Australia and Antarctica during the Eocene-Oligocene transition; the explanatory variable X2 indicates the sequence divergence obtained by p-distance matrix using 16S rDNA sequences.
Figure 4. Venn diagrams obtained by the variation partitioning analysis (VPA) using redundancy analysis (RDA). The partition of the variation of a response variable (X) between two sets of explanatory variables (X1 and X2) is shown. Each circle represents the portion of variation accounting for each explanatory variable or a combination of the explanatory matrices. The intersection between the two circles represents the amount of variation explained by both variables X1 and X2. The response variable (X) is the difference between the LTR retroelements relative abundances; the explanatory variable X1 represents species that have an ancestor that probably experienced an LTR expansion as consequence of climate changes that occurred in Australia and Antarctica during the Eocene-Oligocene transition; the explanatory variable X2 indicates the sequence divergence obtained by p-distance matrix using 16S rDNA sequences.
Ijms 24 06332 g004
Ijms 24 06332 g005 550
Figure 5. TE landscape plots obtained using Kimura distance-based copy divergence analyses of some species belonging to Neognathae (blue box) and Palaeognathae (red box). X axis: Kimura substitution level (CpG adjusted); Y axis: percent of genome. Panel (A) includes Passeriformes; panel (B) includes Psittaciformes; panel (C) includes Struthioniformes, Rheiformes, and Casuariformes.
Figure 5. TE landscape plots obtained using Kimura distance-based copy divergence analyses of some species belonging to Neognathae (blue box) and Palaeognathae (red box). X axis: Kimura substitution level (CpG adjusted); Y axis: percent of genome. Panel (A) includes Passeriformes; panel (B) includes Psittaciformes; panel (C) includes Struthioniformes, Rheiformes, and Casuariformes.
Ijms 24 06332 g005
Ijms 24 06332 g006 550
Figure 6. Hypotheses suggested for A. aestiva and M. monachus evolutionary radiation. Panel (A): the ancestors of A. aestiva and M. monachus migrated from Australia to Antarctica (green arrow). The ancestor of A. aestiva migrated from Antarctica to South America before the dramatic cooling event occurred during the Eocene-Oligocene transition that led to the progressive aridification of Antarctica and Australian landmasses (blue arrow). The ancestor of M. monachus migrated from Antarctica to South America after this climate change event (orange arrow). Panel (B): the ancestors of A. aestiva and M. monachus migrated from Australia to Antarctica (green arrow) and then to South America after dramatic climate change events occurred about 30 Mya (orange arrow). Please see the discussion section for further details. For convenience, the current distribution of continents is shown.
Figure 6. Hypotheses suggested for A. aestiva and M. monachus evolutionary radiation. Panel (A): the ancestors of A. aestiva and M. monachus migrated from Australia to Antarctica (green arrow). The ancestor of A. aestiva migrated from Antarctica to South America before the dramatic cooling event occurred during the Eocene-Oligocene transition that led to the progressive aridification of Antarctica and Australian landmasses (blue arrow). The ancestor of M. monachus migrated from Antarctica to South America after this climate change event (orange arrow). Panel (B): the ancestors of A. aestiva and M. monachus migrated from Australia to Antarctica (green arrow) and then to South America after dramatic climate change events occurred about 30 Mya (orange arrow). Please see the discussion section for further details. For convenience, the current distribution of continents is shown.
Ijms 24 06332 g006
Ijms 24 06332 g007 550
Figure 7. On the left side biome-related distribution is reported for eight species considered in this study. The red box groups the Australian species; C. casuarius is distributed in New Guinea and in York Peninsula (far North Queensland, Australia); S. habroptila is an endemic species of New Zealand. In the geographical map the biomes present in these areas are colored according to the legend.
Figure 7. On the left side biome-related distribution is reported for eight species considered in this study. The red box groups the Australian species; C. casuarius is distributed in New Guinea and in York Peninsula (far North Queensland, Australia); S. habroptila is an endemic species of New Zealand. In the geographical map the biomes present in these areas are colored according to the legend.
Ijms 24 06332 g007
Table
Table 1. Species analyzed in this study.
Table 1. Species analyzed in this study.
SuperorderOrderSpecies
NeognathaeCaprimulgiformesApus apus
Caprimulgus europaeus
Hemiprocne comata
Nyctibius grandis
Podargus strigoides
CharadriiformesPedionomus torquatus
ColumbiformesColumba livia
Streptopelia turtur
GalliformesAlectura lathami
Gallus gallus
PasseriformesFicedula albicollis
Hirundo rustica
Passer domesticus
Taeniopygia guttata
PiciformesColaptes auratus
Dryobates pubescens
PsittaciformesAmazona aestiva
Melopsittacus undulatus
Myiopsitta monachus
Strigops habroptila
SphenisciformesAptenodytes forsteri
Aptenodytes patagonicus
Eudyptes chrysolophus
Spheniscus humboldti
Spheniscus mendiculus
PalaeognathaeCasuariiformesCasuarius casuarius
Dromaius novaehollandiae
RheiformesRhea americana
StruthioniformesStruthio camelus australis
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carotti, E.; Tittarelli, E.; Canapa, A.; Biscotti, M.A.; Carducci, F.; Barucca, M. LTR Retroelements and Bird Adaptation to Arid Environments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076332

AMA Style

Carotti E, Tittarelli E, Canapa A, Biscotti MA, Carducci F, Barucca M. LTR Retroelements and Bird Adaptation to Arid Environments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(7):6332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carotti, Elisa, Edith Tittarelli, Adriana Canapa, Maria Assunta Biscotti, Federica Carducci, and Marco Barucca. 2023. "LTR Retroelements and Bird Adaptation to Arid Environments" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 7: 6332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop