Next Article in Journal
NMR Study on Laccase Polymerization of Kraft Lignin Using Different Enzymes Source
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties of Twisted Carbon Nanotube Bundles with Carbon Linkers from Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Plasma Metabolomic Profile Following Bariatric Surgery, Lifestyle Intervention or Diet Restriction—Insights from Human and Rat Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Temperature CO2 Capture Performance and Kinetic Analysis of Novel Potassium Stannate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An In-Situ Fabrication Method of ZnO and Other Zn(II) Compounds Containing Polypropylene Composites

1
Panamedica Maciej Michalik, Józefa Ignacego Kraszewskiego 18/7, 15-025 Białystok, Poland
2
Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Białystok, Ciołkowskiego 1K, 15-245 Białystok, Poland
3
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Białystok, Ciołkowskiego 1K, 15-245 Białystok, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2357; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032357
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 17 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 25 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Materials Science)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the methods of preparation of zinc oxide-polypropylene nanocomposites and their antibacterial properties. Seven solutions with ZnO nanoparticles or zinc ions were formulated as a PP additive. Two methods of ZnO NPs syntheses were carried out: (1) a modified hydrothermal method where a water solution of zinc acetate dihydrate, PEI, and ammonia were mixed with a final pH 11; (2) a thermal decomposition of a water solution of zinc acetate in the presence of PEI and ammonia using a two-screw extruder. During the experiments, the influence of various amounts of particle stabilizer, heating of the solutions, and the temperatures of the syntheses were examined. As a result, the simultaneous crystallization of ZnO in the extrusion process confirmed this method’s attractiveness from the application point of view. Fabricated PP-ZnO composite shows antibacterial properties against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, a big interest in polymer nanocomposites is being observed. Various polymers as a composite matrix as well as a wide range of metals or metal oxides of nano-size are being used. It is due to the potential of their synergic, unique physical, and chemical properties based on a large surface area to volume ratio of nanoparticles, and polymeric matrix features. High interfacial reactivity typical for individual nanoparticle properties is applied in many industrial branches of textile, medicine, packages, and many others. The most widely used nanoparticles (NPs) in polymer-based composites are silver, gold, titanium oxide, and zinc oxide [1,2,3,4,5].
Moreover, thanks to strong antibacterial properties, the ability of moisture and odor absorption, good thermal stability, and lack of irritation effect zinc oxide NPs are being used in wound dressing and various medical devices [6,7]. Some publications prove that zinc oxide NPs show antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 [8,9].
Various methods have been generally proposed to embed nanoparticles on textile and polymer surfaces. They can be classified into a one-step process (in-situ method) and a two-step process (ex-situ method) [10,11]. The in-situ process consists either of the immersion of synthetic fiber containing ZnO precursors into alkali media or the immersion of fiber or textile into zinc salt in alkali media [12]. The ex-situ synthesis of ZnO is divided into physical and chemical methods. The physical methods include electrospinning and melt spinning with fiber production [12]. The chemical application can be done by so-called layer-by-layer process or immersion of fiber into the dispersion of nano ZnO [10,11]. Homogeneous precipitation [13], wet chemical [14], and hydrothermal methods [15] are examples of the two-step processes which are being used more frequently than the one-step methods. They provide an approach to producing textiles immersed in ZnO solution. The superhydrophobic PP/ZnO nanocomposite surfaces were prepared through the solution casting method when PP granules were dissolved in xylene and then ZnO nanoparticles were added [16]. Becheri and co-workers [13] reported textile was immersed in ZnO solution [13,17,18]. Mao et al. [15] synthesized nano ZnO by the hydrothermal method and applied it to cotton fabrics. The textile was coated with SiO2 and then immersed in the solution of zinc nitrate and hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) at 80 °C for nano ZnO creation. Yadav and colleagues [18] prepared nanoparticles by the wet chemical method. The cotton fabric cut was immersed in the solution containing ZnO and acrylic binder then it was passed through a padding mangle before air drying. The hydrothermal method to synthesize ZnO nanowires on polyethylene fibers was described by Baruah et al. [19] with zinc nitrate hexahydrate and hexamethylenetetramine. Chemical bath deposition (CBD) was used by Fiedot and co-workers [20]. They modified the surface of the polyamide 6 (PA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polypropylene (PP) using zinc oxide during the hydrothermal deposition in HMT and zinc nitrate. Anita et al. [21] prepared ZnO nanoparticles using soluble starch (stabilizing agent), zinc oxide nitrate, and sodium hydroxide (precursors). Then zinc oxide nanoparticles were microencapsulated and applied to a single jersey cotton fabric. Colmenares and co-worker [22] prepared composite filter materials by modification of commercially available polypropylene (PP) nonwovens with particles of nanorods of zinc oxide (ZnO/PP). Jakubiak and co-workers [23] used plasma discharge to improve the wettability and adhesion of ZnO nanoparticles. Electrospinning methods were used by Lee [24] and Kim [25]. The first paper described electrospun ZnO nanocomposite fibers from DMF solution for the development of UV-protective materials. Kim et al. [25] blended ZnO nanoparticles with a solution of nylon 6 to attain fine distribution of ZnO nanoparticles on/into the fibers. Teli et al. [26] showed a method when nanocomposites were melt-spun by adding nano ZnO loaded Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) masterbatch (MB) to the PET chips developed using nano ZnO during the spinning of PET composite fibers. Electrospinning can be also used for ZnO synthesis in a one-step process (in situ). Zhang et al. [27] obtained nanofiber by electrospinning PET solution containing zinc acetate dihydrate as a ZnO precursor. Montazer et al. [28] used the in-situ synthesis of ZnO on wool. For this process, the wool fabric was immersed in zinc acetate (basic condition) and kept at 90 °C for 1 h.
This study aimed to develop a new in-situ method, that allows obtaining a nanocomposite consisting of zinc compounds (including nano ZnO) in a polypropylene matrix as a one-step process. The polypropylene-based composite was obtained by modification of the extrusion process by doping of polymer with ZnO precursor as a water solution. This research concerns various precursor compositions allowing in-situ modification of the polymer and its study its physicochemical properties as well as antibacterial activity.
Fabricated PP-ZnO composite can be afterwards converted to a useful product in post-treatment of modified polymer.

2. Results

Preparation of four zinc oxide precursor solutions. (A) To the glass flasks with a water solution of zinc acetate dihydrate (ZnAc2) (27%), 6,84% of PEI branched was added. The mixture of liquid and solid substrates was subjected at room temperature to intensive stirring (500 rpm) for 3 h—Solution 1 (S1); (B) Solution S2 was obtained by heating S1 at 80 °C for 4 h; (C) Solution S3 was obtained by dropwise addition of the ammonia solution up to pH 11. During the addition, a white precipitate of zinc hydroxide appeared, which dissolved before reaching the desired pH. The stirring was continued for another 3 h at room temperature; (D) Solution S4 was prepared by heating S3 at 80 °C for 4 h; (E) Solution S5 was prepared according to the S1 procedure with doubled amount of PEI. The differences in the fabrication process were presented in Table 1.
Preparation of polypropylene doped with zinc compounds (E_1-4) in the extrusion process.
The extrusion process was carried out using a two-screw extruder and the following temperature setting in the subsequent heating zones:
150/160/165/165/170/170/170/170/170/170/160/170 [°C]. A schematic presentation of the set-up is presented in Figure 1.
Before the extrusion process, the PP was subjected to a temperature of 90 °C for a purpose of material conditioning. Each solution was dosed into the 5th heating zone of the extruder’s cylinder by a peristaltic pump. The rate of the pump and the feeder were synchronized so that the final Zn concentration in granulate was around 2.5%. The extrudate was chilled in a water bath with a water temperature not higher than 30 °C. A masterbatches E_1, E_2, E_3, and E_4 for solution version S1, S2, S3, and S4, respectively were obtained. To improve the composite homogeneity and ZnAc2 decomposition efficiency, each masterbatch was extruded a second time at slightly higher temperatures [°C] at selected zones:
150/160/165/165/170/175/180/185/190/195/200/190 to obtain E_1x2, E_2x2, E_3x2, and E_4x2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. ZnO Precursor Solutions Preparation

Four different methods of zinc oxide precursor preparation were performed (for details see Table 1). The obtained samples were then examined in liquid or dry form by various physicochemical techniques. The results of the selected analyses are presented in the following paragraphs.

3.1.1. Electron Microscopy—Morphology Determination

A small amount of solutions were drop cast and dried at room temperature on SEM Al holders. For comparison, samples dried at 200 °C were prepared. The received samples were characterized and presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
On the SEM images (Figure 2 and Figure 3) a similar pattern of synthesis progression was observed, although solutions were treated in various temperature conditions. When samples were dried at room temperature some crystals appeared (Figure 2a and Figure 3a) visible as light spots on the surface. Therefore, forms of precipitated ZnO or its byproducts that arise as an effect of basic PEI presence, and sample dehydration were observed. As the ammonia solution was added (more basic solution)—Figure 2b and Figure 3b—the number of crystals increased. The size of the particles is much smaller in the case of the lower amount of PEI. In the images of the solutions dried at elevated temperatures bigger, irregular forms are visible. The samples dried at 200 °C look very similar to each other in all sample cases. However, no significant differences in crystallite size were observed suggesting good homogeneity of the film.
Additionally, for nanoscale object visualization, TEM observation of samples prepared in presence of ammonia, and heated for 4 h at 80 °C dried at RT (S4 in Figure 4) was performed. For comparison, to mimic the high-temperature treatment—as in the extruder, samples were dried at 200 °C (S7 in Figure 4). In Figure 4A very small particles 7 ± 3 nm (S7) or 38 ± 7 nm (S4) are seen. Their size depends on the amount of PEI precursor applied. After heat treatment of 200 °C (Figure 4B) a characteristic shape of balls or nests is visible of the size 170 ± 20 nm, or 220 ± 50 nm for S4 and S7, respectively. The shape and the size depends on the amount of ZnO precursor used.
The microscopic observation proved the influence of elevated temperature on the growth of particles. Room temperature drying results in the precipitation of very small objects (below 10 nm). Elevation of temperature causes structure growth. Therefore, the extrusion process is expected to favor particle growth more than the initiation of seed creation as well. Those phenomena are known from other nanoscale systems [29,30,31].

3.1.2. X-ray Diffractions—Structural Characterization

To monitor the influence of preparation conditions on ZnO crystallization X-ray diffraction measurements were taken for samples S1, S4, S5, and S7. Such studies allow confirmation of whether composites contain ZnO in their structure. Obtained diffractograms are collected in Figure 5. By dots are assigned ZnO patterns which correspond to positions of peaks indexed as (100), (002), and (102) in Miller nomenclature of ZnO crystals [32].
According to the diffraction data (Figure 5) only in the S4 and S7 samples, a trace of ZnO forms appeared. Other diffractograms are dominated by zinc acetate peaks, other zinc compounds, or amorphous phases [33]. These results suggest that the heat treatment causes the decomposition of ZnAc2 and its transformation to ZnO and no other stimuli are needed [34]. Such observation allows concluding that the proposed solution can be an effective precursor for PP-ZnO composite fabrication.

3.2. Extrusion—Technical Approach

For PP-ZnO composite preparation solutions S1, S2, S3, and S4 were used. The extrusion process was carried out using a two-screw extruder with the following temperature setting at each section of the cylinder [°C]:
150/160/165/165/170/170/170/170/170/170/160/170. Solutions S1, S2, S3, and S4 were dosed into the 5th heating zone of the extruder’s cylinder by a peristaltic pump. The rate of the pump and the feeder were synchronized so that the final Zn concentration in granulate was around 2.5%. A masterbatches E_1, E_2, E_3, and E_4 for solutions S1, S2, S3, and S4, respectively, were obtained. After taking a sample, each masterbatch was extruded a second time at slightly higher temperatures at selected zones [°C]:
150/160/165/165/170/175/180/185/190/195/200/190) for better ZnO particle distribution (Ex2). It is observed that double extruded extrudate had darker color, probably due to partial polymer degradation.

3.2.1. Melt Flow Index—Mechanical Properties

The Melt Flow Index of obtained granulates was performed after each step of the process. The results of the experiments are shown in Figure 6. For the determination of the influence of extrusion on MFR value results are presented pairwise (first and the second extrusion of the same sample).
The MFR value of the masterbatch extruded once stays in a range: of 30.95–33.64 g/10 min. For the second extrusion, the temperatures were set slightly higher. The composites obtained in this process have therefore higher MFR which stays in the range of 38.36–43.02 g/10 min which ensures its mechanical properties are in an acceptable range. Therefore, the following process is possible.

3.2.2. Optical Microscopy—Composite Morphology

The morphology of the granulates using a high-resolution optical microscope under magnification ×5000 was observed (Figure 7). It is seen that samples E_2x2 and E_4x2 (no ammonia, after the second extrusion) are smoother. Extrudates E_1, E_1x2, E_3, and E_3x2 look very similar. Their surface is flat and only some tiny, evenly dispersed particles are observed which affirms the uniform distribution of additives in a polymeric matrix.

3.2.3. Zn Content Determination in Granulates

The E_1, E_1x2, E_2, and E_2x2 granules were tested for the total amount of zinc by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS). The results are listed in Table 2.
According to the FAAS results, the amount of zinc in the composites is slightly higher than the nominal value which can be related to the relative mechanical movement of polymer and solution in the dispensers. The zinc content in the granulates extruded twice is slightly lower due to the elution of surface-bonded zinc compounds during the extrudate cooling in a water bath. This observation is in agreement with the fabrication procedure and proves that Zn compounds are evenly spaced in the polymer matrix.

3.2.4. Thermal Analysis

The thermal stability and decomposition of PP, PEI, and composites E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2 were studied using thermogravimetric analysis. The TG and DTG curves of the tested materials are presented in Figure 8A,B. A weight loss in the temperature range up to 150 °C observed for PEI is most likely due to the removal of water. The degradation of PEI starts at 250 °C, whereas PP is thermally stable up to 400 °C. The composites start to degrade above 250 °C; however, the observed weight losses are slight up to 400 °C, suggesting the presence of small amounts of PEI. PP and PEI decompose totally in the applied temperature range, whereas in the cases of composites residues at the level of 1–4% are observed (Figure 8A, Table 3). These residues are associated with the presence of zinc and/or zinc compounds (i.e., zinc oxide), which do not decompose in the tested temperature range.
The temperatures of phase transitions and crystallinity of composites were determined based on DSC experiments (Figure 8C–F) and are collected in Table 3. The addition of PEI and Zn compounds only slightly affected the melting temperature and crystallinity of composites compared to the starting PP. On the other hand, it significantly changed their crystallization behavior, generally, the width and maximum of the crystallization peak increased.

3.3. Bacteriostatic and Antibacterial Investigations

The 0.5 mm films were made by press molding out of the E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2 samples and bacteriostatic testing according to ISO 20645 was performed. Tested materials were placed on agar plates seeded with E. coli or S. aureus bacteria. As a reference sample, a polypropylene film without additives was used. Therefore, prepared Petri dishes were incubated at 44 °C and 37 °C for E. coli and S. aureus, respectively. A lack of S. aureus inhibition growth was observed in each sample. The film of E_2 composite was clean from E. coli. Partial inhibition of E. coli growth was observed for samples E_1 and E_3. The films prepared out of composite extruded twice show no bacteriostatic effect.
An antibacterial activity test of E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2 films against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Escherichia coli ATCC 11229 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 4352 according to ISO 20743 was performed. A polypropylene film without additives was used as a reference sample (Table 4).
According to ISO 20743, a result value between 2 < A < 3 means significant bacterial activity and A ≥ 3-strong. The best results were obtained for sample E_1, which contained a solution prepared without heating and without ammonia solution. A slightly lower antibacterial activity index shows samples E_2 and E_3 (solution prepared with heating but without ammonia, and without heating with ammonia, respectively).
The presented results demonstrate that the bacteriostatic and antibacterial activity of fabricated PP-ZnO composites strongly depends on the precursor used and its fabrication history. Therefore, a detailed analysis of this dependence needs more investigation.

4. Materials and Methods

Zinc acetate dihydrate and ammonia solution (30%, w/w) was supplied by Chempur. Polyethyleneimine (PEI) branched was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Polypropylene fiber grade (Moplen HP561R, MFR = 25 g/10 min) was obtained from LyondellBasell. Water was deionized by a Polwater deionizator.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were done to determine the morphology and size of the ZnO particles in the zinc precursor solutions and polymeric composites, respectively. SEM and TEM were performed using—a scanning electron microscope (INSPEC 60) integrated with Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) and FEI Tecnai G2 X-TWIN 200 kV microscope, respectively. To prepare samples for imaging a drop of the solutions S4 or S5 were placed on SEM holders or TEM Cu 400 mesh grids and dried at room temperature or 200 °C on the external heating plate until solvent evaporation.
Optical Microscope. The modified polymeric base in form of granules (after the extrusion process) cross-section was observed under the high-resolution optical microscope (Keyence VHX 6000) to determine the morphology of the composite.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using Agilent Technologies SuperNova diffractometer with a Mo micro-focused source (Kα2 = 0.713067) device for ZnO fraction identification. For this purpose, dried solution residues were placed in a goniometer on a nylon loop via highly viscous oil.
Melt Flow Index (MFR) values of the obtained masterbatches were determined on Dynisco LMI plastometer with 2.16 kg load and 230 °C. The procedure was carried out according to ISO 1133-1.
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed using a Mettler Toledo Star TGA/DSC unit. Samples weighing 2–3 mg were placed in aluminum oxide crucibles and heated from 50 °C to 900 °C at 10 °C min−1 under an argon flow rate of 40 mL min−1. An empty pan was used as the reference.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed using a Mettler Toledo Star DSC unit. Samples weighing 2–3 mg were placed in an aluminum crucible, and an empty pan was used as the reference. The samples were measured using the following procedure: heated from 0 to 230 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1, held isothermally for 3 min, and then cooled to 0 °C at a rate of −30 °C min−1. For each sample, two heating/cooling cycles under an argon flow rate of 200 mL min−1 were performed. Characteristic temperatures (melting and crystallization), and degrees of crystallinity were determined using Mettler Toledo STARe software based on the second cycle of heating and cooling. The heat of melting Δh100% = 207.10 J g−1 was assumed for 100% crystalline PP [35].
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). The total amount of zinc in the samples was examined by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) Solaar M6 equipped with a flame atomizer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Loughborough, UK) and zinc hollow cathode lamp (SMI-LabHub Ltd., Gloucester, UK). After the sample mineralization, the absorption of the obtained solutions was registered at 213.859 nm. The measurements were taken at the fuel flow rate of 1.4 L/min and the burner high of 8.6 mm. During the analysis, a deuterium lamp was used for background correction.
Bacteriostatic activity. The E_1-4 composites were tested for bacteriostatic activity according to ISO 20645. 0.5 mm films were made by press molding out of the obtained masterbatch. Tested materials were placed on agar plates seeded with Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli bacteria. As a reference sample, a polypropylene film without additives was used. Therefore, prepared Petri dishes were incubated at 44 °C and 37 °C for E. coli and S. aureus, respectively.
Antibacterial activity test against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 4352 according to ISO 20743 was performed for the films obtained from the masterbatches. A polypropylene film without additives was used as a reference sample.

5. Conclusions

For the first time, the ZnO-modified polypropylene was obtained via extrusion at elevated temperature from a water solution containing ZnAc2 precursor stabilized by polyimine. Fabricated material exhibits comparable mechanical properties to pure (non-modified) PVP and parallel antibacterial properties against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 4352 thanks to the presence of ZnO or other Zn compounds.
Previously carried out modifications of textile materials with nanoparticles of zinc compounds consisted mainly of surface alterations of already formed polymer fibers. This was mainly carried out using the dipping method.
The method presented in this work is unique due to: (a) the transformation of zinc compounds into nanoparticle structures directly during the extrusion process; (b) the volumetric rather than surface introduction of zinc compounds into the polymer; (c) the use of aqueous solutions of particle precursors and their introduction into the nonpolar polymer; (d) the reduction of the amount of nanoparticles of zinc compounds throughout the process, by forming them directly in the polymer structure; (e) the simplification of the method for the formation of polymer-nanoparticle composites—one-step process; (f) the uniform distribution of nanoparticles in the polymer; (g) the obtaining of the PP-ZnO composite in granular form, which can then be easily converted into a useful product.

Author Contributions

A.Z.W., B.K.-S. and M.M.—conceptualization, and supervision; K.K.—investigation (experiments); K.K., M.B., K.H.M., J.K., B.K.-S. and A.Z.W.—instrumental analyses; A.Z.W., B.K.-S., K.K., J.K. and M.M.—writing (original draft); K.K. and K.H.M.—visualization; A.Z.W., B.K.-S., K.K. and M.M.—writing (review and editing); M.M.—funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was financially supported within Smart Growth Operational Programme 2014–2020, Priority Axis: I Support for R&D activity of enterprises, project: POIR.01.01.01-00-1262/17. The project was co-financed by the European Union from the funds of the European Regional Development Fund. The authors thank I. Święcicka for antibacterial activity test and B. Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz for FAAS experiments realized within project POIR.01.01.01-00-1262/17. Access to equipment in the Centre of Synthesis and Analysis BioNanoTechno of the University of Bialystok was partially supported by project POIR.01.01.01-00-1262/17 as a part of the Smart Growth Operational Programme 2014–2020. The equipment in the Centre was funded by the EU as a part of the Operational Program Development of Eastern Poland 2007–2013, projects: POPW.01.03.00-20-034/09-00 and POPW.01.03.00-20-004/11.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank S. Gorzoch for the laboratory support.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Bleach, R.; Karagoz, B.; Prakash, S.M.; Davis, T.P.; Boyer, C. In Situ Formation of Polymer-Gold Composite Nanoparticles with Tunable Morphologies. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fu, S.; Sun, Z.; Huand, P.; Li, Y. Some basic aspects of polymer nanocomposites: A critical review. Nano Mater. Sci. 2019, 1, 2–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Torres, F.G.; Saavedra, A.C. A comparison between the failure modes observed in biological and synthetic polymer nanocomposites. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2019, 59, 241–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Torabi, N.; Behjat, A.; Shahpari, M.; Edalati, S. Development of a Silver/Polymer Nanocomposite Interconnection Layer for Organic Tandem Solar Cells. J. Nanophotonics 2015, 9, 093049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Awang, M.; Wan Mohd, W.R. Comparative Studies of Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide as a Potential Filler in Polypropylene Reinforced Rice Husk Composite. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 342, 012046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Erem, A.D.; Ozcan, G.; Skrifvars, M. In Vitro Assessment of Antimicrobial Polypropylene/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite Fibers. Text. Res. J. 2013, 83, 2152–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Puspasari, V.; Ridhova, A.; Hermawan, A.; Amal, M.I.; Khan, M.M. ZnO-based antimicrobial coatings for biomedical applications. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2022, 45, 1421–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sunada, K.; Minoshima, M.; Hashimoto, K. Highly Efficient Antiviral and Antibacterial Activities of Solid-State Cuprous Compounds. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 235–236, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sportelli, M.C.; Izzi, M.; Loconsole, D.; Sallustio, A.; Picca, R.A.; Felici, R.; Chironna, M.; Cioffi, N. On the Efficacy of ZnO Nanostructures against SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montazer, M.; Amiri, M.M. ZnO Nano Reactor on Textiles and Polymers: Ex-Situ ZnO Nano Reactor on Textiles and Polymers: Ex-Situ and In-Situ Synthesis, Application and Characterization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1453–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Improving bacterial cellulose films by ex-situ and in-situ modifications: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Becheri, A.; Dürr, M.; Lo Nostro, P.; Baglioni, P. Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Application to Textiles as UV-Absorbers. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2008, 10, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vigneshwaran, N.; Nachane, R.P.; Balasubramanya, R.H.; Varadarajan, P.V. A Novel One-Pot “green” Synthesis of Stable Silver Nanoparticles Using Soluble Starch. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mao, Z.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, L.; Cao, H. The Formation and UV-Blocking Property of Needle-Shaped ZnO Nanorod on Cotton Fabric. Thin Solid Film. 2009, 517, 2681–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hejazi, I.; Hajalizadeh, B.; Seyfi, J.; Sadeghi, G.M.M.; Jafari, S.H.; Khonakdar, H.A. Role of Nanoparticles in Phase Separation and Final Morphology of Superhydrophobic Polypropylene/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite Surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 293, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kathirvelu, S.; D’Souza, L.; Dhurai, B. UV Protection Finishing of Textiles Using ZnO Nanoparticles. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2009, 34, 267–273. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nisansala, D.; Rajapaksha, G.K.M.; Dikella, D.; Dheerasinghe, M.; Sirimuthu, N.; Patabendige, C. Zinc Oxide Nanostructures in the Textile Industry. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 14, 3370–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vigneshwaran, N.; Kumar, S.; Kathe, A.A.; Varadarajan, P.V.; Prasad, V. Functional Finishing of Cotton Fabrics Using Zinc Oxide-Soluble Starch Nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 5087–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baruah, S.; Thanachayanont, C.; Dutta, J. Growth of ZnO Nanowires on Nonwoven Polyethylene Fibers. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 025009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fiedot-Toboła, M.; Ciesielska, M.; Maliszewska, I.; Rac-Rumijowska, O.; Suchorska-Woźniak, P.; Teterycz, H.; Bryjak, M. Deposition of Zinc Oxide on Different Polymer Textiles and Their Antibacterial Properties. Materials 2018, 11, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Anita, S. Preparation, Characterization and Functional Analysis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Coated Single Jersey Cotton Fabric. J. Text. Sci. Eng. 2012, 02, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Colmenares, J.C.; Kuna, E.; Jakubiak, S.; Michalski, J.; Kurzydłowski, K. Polypropylene Nonwoven Filter with Nanosized ZnO Rods: Promising Hybrid Photocatalyst for Water Purification. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 170–171, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jakubiak, S.; Tomaszewska, J.; Jackiewicz, A.; Michalski, J.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Polypropylene—Zinc Oxide Nanorod Hybrid Material for Applications in Separation Processes. Chem. Process Eng. 2016, 37, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, S. Developing UV-Protective Textiles Based on Electrospun Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite Fibers. Fibers Polym. 2009, 10, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, H.J.; Pant, H.R.; Park, C.H.; Tijing, L.D.; Hwang, B.S.; Choi, N.J.; Kim, C.S. Electrical Properties of ZnO/Nylon-6 Spider-Wave-like Nanonets Prepared via Electrospinning. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 2013, 8, 385–393. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ravindra, D.K. Polyester Nanocomposite Fibers with Antibacterial Properties. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 2, 491–502. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, J.; Wen, B.; Wang, F.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, M. In Situ Synthesis of ZnO Nanocrystal/PET Hybrid Nanofibers via Electrospinning. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2011, 49, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Montazer, M.; Amiri, M.M.; Mohammad Ali Malek, R. In Situ Synthesis and Characterization of Nano ZnO on Wool: Influence of Nano Photo Reactor on Wool Properties. Photochem. Photobiol. 2013, 89, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fayaz, A.M.; Balaji, K.; Kalaichelvan, P.T.; Venkatesan, R. Fungal based synthesis of silver nanoparticles—An effect of temperature on the size of particles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amara, H.; Nelayah, J.; Creuze, J.; Chmielewski, A.; Alloyeau, D.; Ricolleau, C.; Legrand, B. Is There Really a Size effect on the Surface Energy of Nanoparticles? 2021. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26218.85446 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  31. Kulpa-Greszta, M.; Tomaszewska, A.; Dziedzic, A.; Pązik, R. Rapid hot-injection as a tool for control of magnetic nanoparticle size and morphology. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 20708–20719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bindu, P.; Thomas, S. Estimation of lattice strain in ZnO nanoparticles: X-ray peak profile analysis. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2014, 8, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Schmitt, M. Synthesis and testing of ZnO nanoparticles for photo-initiation: Experimental observation of two different non-migration initiators for bulk polymerization. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 9532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schmitt, M.; Lalevée, J. ZnO nanoparticles as polymerisation photo-initiator: Levulinic acid/NaOH content variation. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 532, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wagner, M. Thermal Analysis in Practice: Fundamental Aspects; Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG: München, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the extrusion set-up.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the extrusion set-up.
Ijms 24 02357 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of samples dried at room temperature (top row—A) and 200 °C (bottom row—B); S1 (a), S3 (b), S4 (c).
Figure 2. SEM images of samples dried at room temperature (top row—A) and 200 °C (bottom row—B); S1 (a), S3 (b), S4 (c).
Ijms 24 02357 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of samples dried at room temperature (top row—A) and 200 °C (bottom row—B); S5 (a), S6 (b), S7 (c).
Figure 3. SEM images of samples dried at room temperature (top row—A) and 200 °C (bottom row—B); S5 (a), S6 (b), S7 (c).
Ijms 24 02357 g003
Figure 4. TEM images of samples S4 and S7 dried at room temperature (A) and 200 °C (B) in lower and higher magnification.
Figure 4. TEM images of samples S4 and S7 dried at room temperature (A) and 200 °C (B) in lower and higher magnification.
Ijms 24 02357 g004
Figure 5. Diffraction results for samples: S1, S4, S5, and S7. () Miller indexes of ZnO, ()* Miller indexes of ZnAc2.
Figure 5. Diffraction results for samples: S1, S4, S5, and S7. () Miller indexes of ZnO, ()* Miller indexes of ZnAc2.
Ijms 24 02357 g005
Figure 6. Influence of the second extrusion on the MFR value.
Figure 6. Influence of the second extrusion on the MFR value.
Ijms 24 02357 g006
Figure 7. Optical microscope images (magnification ×5000) of one-time and two-times extruded samples.
Figure 7. Optical microscope images (magnification ×5000) of one-time and two-times extruded samples.
Ijms 24 02357 g007
Figure 8. The TGA (A), DTG (B), and DSC (CF) results for PP, PEI, and composites E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2.
Figure 8. The TGA (A), DTG (B), and DSC (CF) results for PP, PEI, and composites E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2.
Ijms 24 02357 g008
Table 1. Experimental data of ZnO precursor solutions preparation.
Table 1. Experimental data of ZnO precursor solutions preparation.
Sample Name% of PEIpHReaction Temperature °C
S16.84-RT
S26.84-80
S36.8411RT
S46.841180
S513.68-RT
S613.6811RT
S713.681180
Table 2. Zn content measured by FAAS method.
Table 2. Zn content measured by FAAS method.
SampleNominal Zn Content [%]Experimental Zn Content [%, w/w]
E_12.52.55
E_1x22.51.98
E_22.52.79
E_2x22.52.71
Table 3. Thermal properties of PP, PEI, and composites E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2. Tm, melting temperature; Tc, crystallization temperature; C, degree of crystallinity.
Table 3. Thermal properties of PP, PEI, and composites E_1, E_1x2, E_2, E_2x2, E_3, E_3x2, E_4, and E_4x2. Tm, melting temperature; Tc, crystallization temperature; C, degree of crystallinity.
SampleResidue at 650 °C
Measured by TG
[%]
Tm
[°C]
Tc
[°C]
C
[%]
PP0166.2107.643
PEI0---
E_11.2167.8115.740
E_1x22.3169.7122.641
E_24.1168.9124.538
E_2x23.5167.5123.440
E_33.6168.8123.442
E_3x22.1167.4124.046
E_42.0167.8124.041
E_4x22.9166.6123.438
Table 4. Antibacterial activity testing results according to ISO 20743.
Table 4. Antibacterial activity testing results according to ISO 20743.
SampleAntibacterial Activity A
Staphylococcus Aureus ATCC 6538Escherichia coli
ATCC 11229
Klebsiella pneumoniae
ATCC 4352
PP0.000.000.00
E_17.627.233.54
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kupińska, K.; Michalik, M.; Krajenta, J.; Bielicka, M.; Markiewicz, K.H.; Kalska-Szostko, B.; Wilczewska, A.Z. An In-Situ Fabrication Method of ZnO and Other Zn(II) Compounds Containing Polypropylene Composites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032357

AMA Style

Kupińska K, Michalik M, Krajenta J, Bielicka M, Markiewicz KH, Kalska-Szostko B, Wilczewska AZ. An In-Situ Fabrication Method of ZnO and Other Zn(II) Compounds Containing Polypropylene Composites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kupińska, Katarzyna, Maciej Michalik, Justyna Krajenta, Magda Bielicka, Karolina Halina Markiewicz, Beata Kalska-Szostko, and Agnieszka Zofia Wilczewska. 2023. "An In-Situ Fabrication Method of ZnO and Other Zn(II) Compounds Containing Polypropylene Composites" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop