Next Article in Journal
Anti-Adipogenic Activity of Secondary Metabolites Isolated from Smilax sieboldii Miq. on 3T3-L1 Adipocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Evolutionary Relationships between Branchiostoma floridae, Ciona intestinalis, and Homo sapiens Globins Provide Evidence of Gene Co-Option and Convergent Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Mutation in the ADAMTS10 Associated with Weil–Marchesani Syndrome with a Unique Presentation of Developed Membranes Causing Severe Stenosis of the Supra Pulmonic, Supramitral, and Subaortic Areas in the Heart
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Functionally Segmented Intestine in Tunicate Ascidian
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ring Finger 149-Related Is an FGF/MAPK-Independent Regulator of Pharyngeal Muscle Fate Specification

by
Burcu Vitrinel
1,2,
Christine Vogel
1,† and
Lionel Christiaen
2,3,*,†
1
Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
2
Center for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
3
Michael Sars Centre, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, 5020 Bergen, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8865; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108865
Submission received: 13 March 2023 / Revised: 26 April 2023 / Accepted: 29 April 2023 / Published: 16 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ascidian Early Development)

Abstract

:
During embryonic development, cell-fate specification gives rise to dedicated lineages that underlie tissue formation. In olfactores, which comprise tunicates and vertebrates, the cardiopharyngeal field is formed by multipotent progenitors of both cardiac and branchiomeric muscles. The ascidian Ciona is a powerful model to study cardiopharyngeal fate specification with cellular resolution, as only two bilateral pairs of multipotent cardiopharyngeal progenitors give rise to the heart and to the pharyngeal muscles (also known as atrial siphon muscles, ASM). These progenitors are multilineage primed, in as much as they express a combination of early ASM- and heart-specific transcripts that become restricted to their corresponding precursors, following oriented and asymmetric divisions. Here, we identify the primed gene ring finger 149 related (Rnf149-r), which later becomes restricted to the heart progenitors, but appears to regulate pharyngeal muscle fate specification in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated loss of Rnf149-r function impairs atrial siphon muscle morphogenesis, and downregulates Tbx1/10 and Ebf, two key determinants of pharyngeal muscle fate, while upregulating heart-specific gene expression. These phenotypes are reminiscent of the loss of FGF/MAPK signaling in the cardiopharyngeal lineage, and an integrated analysis of lineage-specific bulk RNA-seq profiling of loss-of-function perturbations has identified a significant overlap between candidate FGF/MAPK and Rnf149-r target genes. However, functional interaction assays suggest that Rnf149-r does not directly modulate the activity of the FGF/MAPK/Ets1/2 pathway. Instead, we propose that Rnf149-r acts both in parallel to the FGF/MAPK signaling on shared targets, as well as on FGF/MAPK-independent targets through (a) separate pathway(s).

1. Introduction

During vertebrate development, the heart arises from distinct first and second heart fields [1,2,3]. Clonal analyses have shown that first and second heart field progenitor cells arise from independent pools of multipotent Mesp1+ progenitors [4,5]. However, common pools of progenitors give rise to the second heart field and the branchiomeric/pharyngeal muscles [6,7], referred to as the cardiopharyngeal lineages.
Here, we leveraged the simplicity of the cardiogenic lineage in Ciona, a simple tunicate among the closest living relatives to vertebrates [8,9], to study cardiopharyngeal cell-fate choices. Ciona allows us to study the conserved early stages of cardiopharyngeal development with exceptional spatial and temporal resolution, and therefore has emerged as a suitable model organism to understand developmental fate choices between cardiac and pharyngeal muscle cells [10]. In Ciona, early lineage commitment typically restricts the competence of progenitors prior to lineage amplification by proliferation; in contrast, multipotent progenitors are amplified prior to fate specification in mammalian embryos [11]. Similar to their vertebrate counterparts, the cardiopharyngeal lineage of Ciona stems from multipotent progenitors, the trunk ventral cells (TVCs), which emerge from Mesp+ mesodermal progenitors. The TVCs are induced by fibroblast growth factor/mitogen-activated protein kinase (FGF/MAPK) signaling and migrate as bilateral pairs of cells, until the left and right pairs meet at the ventral midline and resume cell divisions (Figure 1a) [12,13,14,15]. Late TVCs undergo oriented and asymmetric divisions that produce first heart precursors (FHPs) and secondary TVCs (STVCs), which then give rise to second heart precursors (SHPs) and pharyngeal muscle precursors (also known as atrial muscle founder cells, ASMFs) (Figure 1a). STVCs activate Tbx1/10, the homolog of human TBX1 that is required for cell-specific expression of the pharyngeal muscle determinant Ebf [14,16,17]. The FGF/MAPK signaling pathway is a key regulator of successive cardiopharyngeal fate decisions in Ciona. FGF/MAPK signaling is required for the induction of first and second-generation multipotent cardiopharyngeal progenitors (also known as TVCs, and STVCs), and for the subsequent activation of the siphon/pharyngeal muscle program in their corresponding progenitors [18,19].
Over the past decade, we have extensively documented gene expression dynamics, and begun to decipher the underlying gene regulatory networks that govern early cardiopharyngeal development in Ciona. A key feature of the transcriptome dynamics that determine cardiopharyngeal transitions is multilineage priming, whereby multipotent cardiopharyngeal progenitors co-express early key regulators of the cardiac- and pharyngeal muscle-specific programs [17,22]. We surmise that multilineage transcriptional priming, while contributing to multipotency, also poses a challenge for subsequent fate specification following cell divisions, as fate-restricted progenitors inherit gene products that belong to the alternative fates, and might interfere with commitment to a cardiac or pharyngeal muscle identity. For instance, single cell RNA-seq datasets have indicated that first and second heart precursors inherit pharyngeal muscle-specific mRNAs that are downregulated with varying dynamics after cell division and upon commitment to a cardiac identity [22]. We thus hypothesize that cell-type-specific post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms contribute to early cardiopharyngeal development, by remodeling inherited transcriptomes and proteomes upon fate specification and commitment.
Here, we focused on candidate post-transcriptional regulators showing differential gene expression in the cardiopharyngeal lineage and identified ring finger protein 149 related (hereafter referred to as Rnf149-r), a previously uncharacterized gene, as a necessary determinant of pharyngeal muscle identity. Rnf149-r is a transcriptionally primed heart marker in the cardiopharyngeal lineage [22] that also encodes the postplasmic RNA (also known as posterior end mark, PEM) known as Pen-1 [23]. Rnf149-r/Pen-1 is dynamically expressed in various tissues during embryogenesis, including the central nervous system, the notochord, and the epidermis, further suggesting pleiotropic functions. The predicted structure of the Rnf149-r protein revealed an atypical RNF organization, with a protease-associated domain, but lacking the catalytic RING domain. In the cardiopharyngeal lineage, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated loss of Rnf149-r function disrupted pharyngeal muscle specification, most likely through the inhibition of Ebf gene expression. The effects of Rnf149-rCRISPR partially phenocopied the loss of FGF/MAPK signaling, including a significant overlap of dysregulated genes from bulk RNA-seq experiments on FACS-purified cells. Finally, functional interaction assays suggested that Rnf149-r acts in parallel to the FGFR/MEK/Ets1/2 pathway upstream of Ebf activation, thus revealing the existence of FGF/MAPK-independent regulatory inputs into pharyngeal muscle specification.

2. Results

2.1. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis Identifies the Pharyngeal Muscle Determinant Rnf149-r

We have previously observed extensive multilineage transcriptional priming in multipotent cardiopharyngeal progenitors [22]. This led us to hypothesize that lineage-specific post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms contribute to remodeling transcriptomes and proteomes during heart vs. pharyngeal muscle fate decisions. In order to identify candidate post-transcriptional regulators, we cataloged genes encoding proteins annotated as RNA-binding and/or involved in ubiquitination pathways (GO terms GO:0003723 and GO:0016567, respectively), using the ANISEED database of GOSlim annotations, curated using data from InterPro and UniProt (Supplementary Table S1) [24,25,26]. We integrated this table, containing 945 candidate genes, with previous cardiopharyngeal lineage-specific single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data to identify candidate heart- and pharyngeal-muscle-specific post-transcriptional regulators [22] (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). In a pilot approach, we selected 14 cardiopharyngeal genes that encode either ubiquitin ligase-related proteins (Rnf149-r, Asb2, Bag3/4, Rbms1/2/3) or RNA-binding proteins (Nova, Rbfox1/2/3, Rbms1/2/3, Rbm24/38, Qki, Ube2ql1, Pcbp3, Ube2j1, Otud3, Psmd14). We performed dual fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (FISH-IHC) to verify their predicted expression in the heart and/or pharyngeal muscle precursors (Figure S1). We conducted lineage-specific loss-of-function analyses using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to target 6 of 15 candidate regulators [27,28,29,30]. We collected swimming larvae (stage 29/30; 26 h post-fertilization at ~18 °C), and scored the morphology of the cardiopharyngeal lineage, notably the presence or absence of the conspicuous pharyngeal/atrial siphon muscle (ASM) rings (Figure 1b,c; [14]). We targeted the neurogenic bHLH-factor-coding gene neurogenin (NeurogCRISPR) as a control, since it is neither expressed in the cardiopharyngeal mesoderm nor thought to be involved in cardiopharyngeal development [30]. We used CRISPR reagents targeting the pigment cell-specific marker tyrosinase (TyrCRISPR) as an alternative control condition throughout the manuscript.
Lineage-specific CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of ring finger protein 149 related (Rnf149-r) showed the most penetrant phenotype, characterized by disrupted pharyngeal muscle morphogenesis (Chi-square test, p-value < 0.0001; Figure 1d). Rnf149-r mutagenesis caused pharyngeal muscle morphogenesis defects, whereby the cells failed to migrate toward the atrial siphon placode (ASP) and form the atrial siphon muscle (ASM) rings or crescents observed in control larvae [14]. ASM rings were present in control conditions targeting either Neurog or tyrosinase (Tyr), which is also inactive in the cardiopharyngeal lineage (Figure 1b–e). In order to confirm the specificity of the Rnf149-rCRISPR phenotype, we targeted Rnf149-r using 2 sgRNAs targeting different positions in the coding sequence (Figure S2a). These sgRNAs produced similar pharyngeal muscle morphogenesis defects, whether used in combination or separately, indicating that both reagents contribute to the phenotype and are specific to Rnf149-r (Figure S2b). In order to further ascertain specificity, we expressed the CRISPR/Cas9 reagents alongside a rescue construct, consisting of a CRISPR/Cas9-resistant form of an Rnf149-r cDNA, with mutations in the protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) of both of the sgRNAs used (Rnf149-rmut), and expressed it under the control of the cardiopharyngeal progenitor-specific Foxf enhancer [31]. Remarkably, the proportion of larvae showing signs of normal ASM morphogenesis increased from ~20% in Rnf149-rCRISPR animals to ~70% following co-expression of Rnf149-rmut (Figure 1e). Circumstantial evidence suggested that Rnf149-rmut overexpression did not cause any overt phenotype, and we did not pursue these experiments further. Taken together, these data indicate that the observed pharyngeal muscle phenotype is specifically caused by the loss of Rnf149-r function in the cardiopharyngeal lineage.
Consistent with a potential role in cardiopharyngeal development, the uncharacterized gene Rnf149-r is transcriptionally primed in multipotent progenitors at the tailbud stage (stage 22), and restricted to the heart progenitors in swimming larvae (Figure S3) [22]. In order to understand whether the phenotype is primarily caused by cellular behavior or fate-specification defects, we assayed the expression of the essential ASM determinant and specific marker Ebf, in hatching larvae (stage 26; [14,17,32]). The ASM-specific factor Ebf is necessary and sufficient to suppress the heart program and impose the pharyngeal muscle fate in the cardiopharyngeal lineage [14,17]. Rnf149-r mutagenesis caused a lineage-specific loss of Ebf expression, which typically produced ectopic cardiac specification and ASM fate-specification defects, thus abolishing migration toward the ASP (Figure 2a,b) [17,28].
As we observed phenotypic defects at 18 and 26 hpf, we asked whether earlier cardiopharyngeal development is affected by the loss of Rnf149-r function. We tested TVC migration and expression of the TVC marker Hand-r at the late tailbud stage (12 hpf at 18 °C). However, we did not observe any difference between the experimental and control animals (Figure S4). In light of these results, we propose that Rnf149-r function is necessary for the transition to the pharyngeal muscle fate from a multipotent cardiopharyngeal progenitor state.

2.2. Rnf149-r Encodes an Atypical Ubiquitin Ligase-Related Protein

We identified Rnf149-r for CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis as a candidate post-transcriptional regulator because it was annotated as a RING-finger-domain-containing protein, which typically comprise E3-ubiquitin ligases. However, closer inspection indicated that the predicted Ciona Rnf149-r protein lacks a RING domain but contains a protease-associated (PA) domain (Figure S5). PA domains in humans and other higher vertebrates can co-exist with RING domains, as well as other functionally active domains, such as EGF, RZF family, and transferrin receptor domains [33].
Similar to other organisms, the Ciona genome encodes a variety of PA-domain-containing proteins. This domain in Ciona occurs as the only defined domain in two predicted proteins, including Rnf149-r. The other PA-domain proteins also contain associated glycosidase domains, Zn-independent exopeptidase domains, transferrin receptor-like dimerization domains, and/or RING domains (Figure S5, Supplementary Table S3). Our sequence analyses showed that Rnf149-r has one homolog with a similar domain architecture in Ciona, Rnf150, prompting us to hypothesize that Rnf149-r may act as a natural dominant-negative inhibitor of Rnf150 function. However, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated loss of Rnf150 function did not cause any overt phenotype, nor did it rescue loss of Rnf149-r function, leading us to rule out Rnf150 as a mediator of the Rnf149-rCRISPR phenotype (Figure S6).

2.3. Rnf149-r Regulates Cardiopharyngeal Fates Independently of FGF/MAPK Signaling

Fibroblast growth factor/mitogen-activated protein kinase (FGF/MAPK) signaling is a key regulator of cardiopharyngeal fates in Ciona, with established roles in early Mesp+ mesoderm specification and multipotent progenitor induction and migration [12,18]. Sustained FGF/MAPK activity leads to localized Ebf expression in ASM precursors, while its exclusion from first and second heart precursors permits cardiac specification [19,22]. MAPK activity in early pharyngeal muscle progenitors initiates Ebf expression, until Ebf accumulation permits MAPK-independent auto-activation. This switch is surmised to explain the transition from the multipotent state to the committed pharyngeal muscle fate [19].
The Rnf149-rCRISPR phenotype resembles the loss of MAPK function, as observed following lineage-specific misexpression of a dominant-negative form of the FGF receptor, or by treatment with the MEK inhibitor U0126 (Razy-Krajka et al., 2018). Moreover, in vitro studies have shown that human RNF149 interacts with and induces ubiquitination of the classic regulator of Mek1/2 and MAPK signaling, Braf [34]. We thus hypothesized that Rnf149-r regulates the pharyngeal muscle fate choice by interacting with FGF/MAPK signaling.
In order to test these hypotheses, we overexpressed constitutively active forms of M-Ras and Mek1/2 in parallel with Rnf149-rCRISPR and used Ebf expression as the readout of pharyngeal muscle fate specification. The overexpression of constitutively active forms of either M-Ras or Mek1/2 suffices to cause ectopic Ebf expression in the cardiopharyngeal lineage and abolish the heart fate [19] (Figure 3). We first combined Rnf149-rCRISPR with overexpression of a defined constitutively active form of M-Ras, M-RasG22V (called M-RasCA hereafter), which is the only Ras homolog in Ciona and acts in the FGF/MAPK pathway [35]. We also overexpressed a constitutively active form of Mek1/2, Mek1/2S220E,S216D (MekCA hereafter) [19], a key regulator of MAPK activity downstream of M-Ras (Figure 3a). We expressed these constructs using the TVC-specific Foxf enhancer to restrict the misexpression of the constitutively active mutants to the TVCs and their progeny. Accordingly, we did not observe any unrelated early cardiopharyngeal development defects. In either case, the effects of Rnf149-rCRISPR dominated the ectopic activation of the Ras/Mek pathway and blocked Ebf expression (Figure 3). The dominance of the Rnf149CRISPR phenotype was even more clearly observable when using Foxf>LacZ to label transfected cells and account for mosaicism (Figure S7). These results indicate that Rnf149-r function is required, either in parallel to the FGF/MAPK pathway or downstream of Mek, for proper Ebf expression and by extension for pharyngeal muscle specification.
The transcription factor Ets1/2 is a known downstream effector of the FGF/MAPK pathway, presumed to control cardiopharyngeal development in Ciona [18,36] (Christiaen lab, unpublished observations). We tested possible functional interactions between Rnf149-r and Ets1/2, finding that Rnf149-rCRISPR also inhibits the ectopic Ebf expression phenotype obtained with Ets1/2 overexpression (Figure 3).
This systematic dominance of the Rnf149-rCRISPR phenotype over a gain of either M-Ras, Mek1/2, or Ets1/2 function suggested that the uncharacterized protein Rnf149-r acts in parallel to the FGF/MAPK pathway upstream of Ebf activation during pharyngeal muscle specification. This is consistent with the above conclusion that Rnf149-r functions later than the late tailbud stage, since FGF/MAPK is already active and necessary for multipotent progenitor induction and maintenance [18,19].

2.4. Rnf149-r Regulates Both MAPK-Dependent and Independent Genes

In order to explore the broader transcriptional impact of Rnf149-r loss-of-function, we performed lineage-specific bulk RNA-seq experiments on FACS-purified cardiopharyngeal cells following CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of either Rnf149-r or tyrosinase as a control, in biological triplicate. Out of 15,232 genes quantified, 190 were significantly differentially expressed, with a false discovery rate (FDR) lower than 0.05. Out of 190, 166 of these genes were upregulated and 24 were downregulated in the Rnf149-rCRISPR condition compared to TyrCRISPR controls. Rnf149-r, as well as three known pharyngeal muscle progenitor cell-specific markers, namely Ebf, Htr7, and Tbx1/10, were all significantly downregulated in the Rnf149-rCRISPR condition [19,22] (Figure 4a, Supplementary Table S5). By contrast, the classic cardiac determinants Nk4/Nkx2-5, Gata4/5/6, and Hand and the heart precursor markers Slit, Lrp4/8, and Mmp21 were slightly upregulated but not significantly (Supplementary Table S5).
As MAPK is a key regulator of fate in the cardiopharyngeal lineage, we compared the significantly changing expression levels with those observed following overexpression of the dominant-negative Fgf receptor, Foxf>FgfrDN. We observed a positive correlation between the fold-changes for both experiments when only the significantly changing genes in the Rnf149-rCRISPR experiment were considered (Figure 4b). There was a significant correlation between the transcriptome responses to the loss of Rnf149-r and Fgfr functions. A Fisher’s test comparing the RNA-seq datasets obtained following FgfrDN and Rnf149-rCRISPR perturbations showed a greater overlap of genes that were significantly dysregulated than expected by chance (p-value = 4.7 × 10−08, odds ratio = 3.3) (Figure 4c). Since FgfrDN has been previously shown to cause the upregulation of cardiac markers [22], these observations are consistent with a partial conversion of pharyngeal muscle progenitors to a heart-like fate in Rnf149-rCRISPR.

3. Discussion

In this study, we identified ring finger 149 related (Rnf149-r) as a new regulator of cardiopharyngeal lineage development in the tunicate Ciona. We showed that the predicted Rnf149-r sequence contains a protein–protein interaction domain typically found in other Ring finger ubiquitin ligases, and that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated loss-of-function affects pharyngeal muscle fate specification. We developed molecular tools to study the function of this gene using CRISPR/Cas9 reagents and epistasis assays via overexpression and expression of dominant-negative reagents altering the activity of the FGF/MAPK pathway. Our analyses suggested that Rnf149-r acts in parallel to the FGF/MAPK pathway on shared targets. We thus uncovered a potential entry point for a novel pathway regulating cardiac vs. pharyngeal muscle fate specification.
Recent studies from our lab have shown that transcriptional inputs from FGF/MAPK signaling are required at successive stages for pharyngeal muscle specification in Ciona [19,22]. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated loss of Rnf149-r function phenocopied the loss of Ebf expression and pharyngeal muscle specification induced by inhibition of FGF/MAPK signaling, and an RNF149 homolog was shown to regulate Raf; we thus hypothesized that Rnf149-r regulates MAPK signaling. However, Rnf149-r loss of function did not alter expression of the multipotent progenitor marker Hand-r, the maintenance of which relies on continuous inputs from MEK activity. In addition, while lineage-specific bulk RNA-seq analysis of either Rnf149-rCRISPR or Fgfr inhibition showed a correlated and significant overlap of differentially expressed genes, including known STVC and ASMF markers such as Htr7, Tbx1/10, and Ebf, there were substantial fractions of genes dysregulated by perturbation of either FGF-MAPK or Rnf149-r alone. Moreover, functional interaction assays between Rnf149-rCRISPR and gain of Ras, Mek, and Ets1/2 functions, indicated that Rnf149-r activity was required for each gain-of-function perturbation to cause ectopic Ebf expression, suggesting that Rnf149-r acts in parallel with FGF/MAPK/Ets, targeting a partially shared set of genes.
We note several possible future extensions of this work. First, as Rnf149-r is a primed heart gene, it might itself be subject to post-transcriptional regulation. Second, the role of the protein interaction domain in Rnf149-r is unknown, and future pulldown experiments followed by mass spectrometry-based identification of interaction partners would provide insights into Rnf149-r molecular function and the hypothesized regulatory pathway involved.

4. Methods

4.1. Ciona Robusta Handling

Wild and gravid Ciona robusta, also known as Ciona intestinalis type A, adults were obtained from M-REP (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and kept under constant light to avoid spawning. Gametes from several animals were collected separately for in vitro cross-fertilization followed by dechorionation and electroporation as previously described [37]. The embryos were cultured in filtered artificial seawater buffered with TAPS (FASW-T) in agarose-coated plastic Petri dishes at 18 °C. We electroporated 50 µg of construct for FACS purification (Mesp>tagRFP, MyoD905>eGFP and Hand-r>tagBFP) and 70 µg of experimental construct (Mesp>LacZ, Mesp>FgfrDN, Mesp>MekS216D,S220E).

4.2. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis

Six to eight single guide RNAs (sgRNA) per gene with Doench scores (http://crispor.tefor.net, v4.0, accessed on 12 November 2022) [29] higher than 60 were designed to induce mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas9 in the B7.5 lineage as described [30] (Supplementary Table S4). The efficiency of sgRNAs was evaluated using the peakshift method as described [30]. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions were also evaluated by PCR amplification directly from embryo lysates following electroporation with Ef1a>nls::Cas9-Gem::nls. sgRNAs were expressed using the Ciona robusta U6 promoter [28]. For each gene, two or three guide RNAs were used to total 50 μg, in combination with 25 μg of each expression plasmid. A total of 25 μg of Mesp>nls::Cas9-Gem::nls plasmid was co-electroporated with guide RNA expression plasmids for B7.5 lineage-specific CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis. One guide RNA was used to mutagenize tyrosinase and neurogenin, which are not expressed in the cardiopharyngeal lineage and thus were used to control the specificity of the CRISPR/Cas9 system [22].

4.3. Molecular Cloning of Rnf149-rmut Rescue Construct

The coding sequence for wild-type Rnf149-r (KH.C2.994) was obtained from the plasmid contained in the C. intestinalis full ORF Gateway-compatible clone VES66_B12. Insertion of the product into the expression vector was performed using the In-fusion protocol (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis and two-step overlap PCRs were used to generate the point-mutated form Rnf149-rmut from the corresponding wild-type sequences. We used oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis to generate mismatches in the PAM sequences adjacent to the sgRNA targets. As a result of the disturbance of a correct PAM sequence (NGG, (reverse complement CCN)), overexpressed Rnf149-rmut is resistant to Cas9 nuclease activity.

4.4. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Immunohistochemistry (FISH-IHC) of Ciona Embryos

The following ISH probes were obtained from plasmids contained in the C. intestinalis full ORF Gateway-compatible clone: Rnf149-r (VES66_B12), Bag3/4 (VES90_E04), Rbm24/38 (VES87_P24), Asb2 (VES74_P16), Qki (VES69_A06), Rbms1/2/3 (VES90_E05), Psmd14 (VES70_A18), Ube2ql1 (VES68_H10), Otud3 (VES70_G23), Natn1 (VES91_K15) and: C. intestinalis gene collection release I: Smurf1/2 (GC20g07), Pcbp3 (GC07e08), Ube2j1 (GC03l08).
PCR amplification of transcription templates was performed with the following oligos: M13 fw (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) and M13 rev (5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′). DIG- and fluorescein-labeled probes were transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase (Roche) using DIG labeling (Roche) and purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Antisense RNA probes were synthesized as described [38]. In vitro antisense RNA synthesis was performed using T7 RNA polymerase (Roche, Cat. No. 10881767001) and the DIG RNA Labeling Mix (Roche, Cat. No. 11277073910).
Embryos were harvested and fixed at desired developmental stages for 2 h in 4% MEM-PFA (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M MOPS pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.05% Tween 20), rinsed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), gradually dehydrated for 1.5 h, and stored in 75% ethanol at −20 °C. They were then rehydrated gradually using a methanol/PBS–Tween series, and whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed as previously described [16,17]. An anti-digoxigenin-POD Fab fragment (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was first used to detect the hybridized probes, then the signal was revealed using tyramide signal amplification (TSA) with the Fluorescein TSA Plus Evaluation Kit (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
For immunohistochemistry, samples were blocked in Tris–NaCl blocking buffer (Blocking Reagent, PerkinElmer) for 2–4 h preceding primary antibody incubation and 1 h preceding secondary antibody incubation. Antibody solutions were prepared in Tris–NaCl blocking buffer and incubated for 1–2 h at room temperature, followed by an overnight incubation at 4 °C. Anti–β-galactosidase monoclonal mouse antibody (Promega, 1:500) was co-incubated with anti-mCherry polyclonal rabbit antibody (Bio Vision, Cat. No. 5993–100, 1:500) for immunodetection of Mesp>nls::lacZ and Mesp>hCD4::mCherry products, respectively. Goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies coupled with AlexaFluor-555 and AlexaFluor-633 were used to detect β-galactosidase-bound mouse antibodies and mCherry-bound rabbit antibodies after the TSA reaction. Antibody washes were performed using Tris–NaCl–Tween buffer. Samples were mounted in ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, catalog number P36930) and stored at 4 °C.
Images were acquired with an inverted Leica TCS SP8 X confocal microscope, using an HC PL APO ×63/1.30 objective. Maximum projections were processed with maximum projection tools from the Leica software LAS-AF.

4.5. Cell Dissociation and FACS-Purification of Ciona Robusta Cells

Sample dissociation and FACS were performed as previously described [39,40]. Embryos and larvae were harvested at 15 hpf in 5-mL borosilicate glass tubes (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA. Cat. No. 14-961-26) and washed with 2 mL calcium- and magnesium-free artificial seawater (CMF-ASW: 449 mM NaCl, 33 mM Na2SO4, 9 mM KCl, 2.15 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM Tris-Cl pH 8.2, 2.5 mM EGTA). Embryos and larvae were dissociated in 2 mL 0.2% trypsin (w/v, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, T- 4799) in CMF-ASW by pipetting with glass Pasteur pipettes. The dissociation was stopped by adding 2 mL filtered ice cold 0.05% BSA CMF-ASW. Dissociated cells were passed through a 40-μm cell-strainer and collected in a 5-mL polystyrene round-bottom tube (Corning Life Sciences, Oneonta, New York, NY, USA). Cells were collected by centrifugation at ~5.34 × 10−10 m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2 (i.e. 800 G) for 3 min at 4 °C, followed by two washes with ice cold CMF-ASW. Cell suspensions were filtered again through a 40 μm cell-strainer and kept on ice.
Cardiopharyngeal lineage cells were labeled with Mesp>tagRFP and Hand-r>tagBFP reporters. The mesenchyme cells were counter-selected using MyoD905>GFP. Dissociated cells were loaded in a BD FACS AriaTM cell sorter. A 488-nm laser and FITC filter were used for GFP; a 407-nm laser and DsRed filter were used for tagRFP; and a 561-nm laser and Pacific BlueTM filter were used for tagBFP.

4.6. RNA-seq Library Preparation, Sequencing and Analysis

To profile the transcriptomes of FACS-purified cells from Rnf149-rCRISPR and control samples, 1,000 cells were directly sorted in 100 μL lysis buffer from the RNAqueous-Micro Total RNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Waltham, MA, USA). For each condition, samples were obtained in three biological replicates. The total RNA extraction was performed following the manufacturer’s instruction. The quality and quantity of total RNA was checked using Agilent RNA ScreenTape (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the 4200 TapeStation system. RNA samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) >8 were kept for downstream cDNA synthesis. A total of 250–2000 pg of total RNA was loaded as a template for cDNA synthesis using the SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) with template switching technology. RNA-Seq libraries were prepared and barcoded using the Ovation Ultralow System V2 (NuGen, San Carlos, CA, USA). Six barcoded samples were pooled in one lane of the flow cell and sequenced by Illumina NextSeq 750 (MidOutput run). Paired-end 75-bp-length reads were obtained from all the bulk RNA-seq libraries. Bulk RNA-seq libraries were aligned using STAR 2.7.0a [41] with the parameters ‘--runThreadN 6--outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate\--outSAMunmapped Within\--outSAMattributes Standard’. Counts were obtained using featureCounts, a function of subread [42,43]. Differential expression was calculated using DESeq2 [44].

4.7. Data Availability

The RNA-seq data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE171152. Previously published bulk RNA-seq data that were used here for comparison in Figure 4 can be found on GEO under accession GSE99846.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24108865/s1.

Author Contributions

B.V., C.V. and L.C. designed the project; B.V. performed all experiments and analyses; B.V., C.V. and L.C. discussed the results, drew conclusions and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

American Heart Association, grant #18PRE33990254; NYU Fleur Strand Graduate Fellowship; NYU GSAS Dean’s Dissertation Fellowship; National Institutes of Health 5R35GM127089; Leducq Foundation, award 15CVD01; National Institute of Health, award R01 HL108643.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-seq data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE171152. Previously published bulk RNA-seq data that were used here for comparison in Figure 4 can be found on GEO under accession GSE99846.

Acknowledgments

B.V. acknowledges funding by the American Heart Association, grant #18PRE33990254, the NYU Fleur Strand Graduate Fellowship, and the NYU GSAS Dean’s Dissertation Fellowship. C.V. acknowledges funding by the National Institutes of Health 5R35GM127089. L.C. acknowledges funding by the Leducq Foundation, award 15CVD01, and by the National Institute of Health, award R01 HL108643. We thank Yelena Bernadskaya for the critical reading of and feedback on the manuscript. We thank Alberto Stolfi and Shashank Gandhi for NovaCRISPR and Nova riboprobe and Manar Elzaky for Rnf149-r structure analysis. We thank the NYU Genomics Core facility for technical support for FACS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kelly, R.G.; Buckingham, M.E.; Moorman, A.F. Heart Fields and Cardiac Morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a015750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kelly, R.G. Advances in the second heart field. In Molecular Mechanism of Congenital Heart Disease and Pulmonary Hypertension; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Buckingham, M. First and Second Heart Field. In Heart Development and Regeneration; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lescroart, F.; Chabab, S.; Lin, X.; Rulands, S.; Paulissen, C.; Rodolosse, A.; Auer, H.; Achouri, Y.; Dubois, C.; Bondue, A.; et al. Early lineage restriction in temporally distinct populations of Mesp1 progenitors during mammalian heart development. Nature 2014, 16, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Devine, W.P.; Wythe, J.D.; George, M.; Koshiba-Takeuchi, K.; Bruneau, B.G. Early patterning and specification of cardiac progenitors in gastrulating mesoderm. eLife 2014, 3, e03848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lescroart, F.; Hamou, W.; Francou, A.; Théveniau-Ruissy, M.; Kelly, R.G.; Buckingham, M. Clonal analysis reveals a common origin between nonsomite-derived neck muscles and heart myocardium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1446–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lescroart, F.; Kelly, R.; le Garrec, J.-F.; Nicolas, J.-F.; Meilhac, S.; Buckingham, M. Clonal analysis reveals common lineage relationships between head muscles and second heart field derivatives in the mouse embryo. Development 2010, 137, 3269–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Delsuc, F.; Brinkmann, H.; Chourrout, D.; Philippe, H. Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 2006, 439, 965–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Putnam, N.H.; Butts, T.; Ferrier, D.E.K.; Furlong, R.F.; Hellsten, U.; Kawashima, T.; Robinson-Rechavi, M.; Shoguchi, E.; Terry, A.; Yu, J.-K.; et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 2008, 453, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaplan, N.; Razy-Krajka, F.; Christiaen, L. Regulation and evolution of cardiopharyngeal cell identity and behavior: Insights from simple chordates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2015, 32, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anderson, H.E.; Christiaen, L. Ciona as a Simple Chordate Model for Heart Development and Regeneration. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2016, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Christiaen, L.; Davidson, B.; Kawashima, T.; Powell, W.; Nolla, H.; Vranizan, K.; Levine, M. The transcription/migration interface in heart precursors of Ciona intestinalis. Science 2008, 320, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Davidson, B.; Shi, W.; Levine, M. Uncoupling heart cell specification and migration in the simple chordate Ciona intestinalis. Development 2005, 132, 4811–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stolfi, A.; Gainous, T.B.; Young, J.J.; Mori, A.; Levine, M.; Christiaen, L. Early Chordate Origins of the Vertebrate Second Heart Field. Science 2010, 329, 565–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Satou, Y.; Imai, K.S.; Satoh, N. The ascidian Mesp gene specifies heart precursor cells. Development 2004, 131, 2533–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, W.; Razy-Krajka, F.; Siu, E.; Ketcham, A.; Christiaen, L. NK4 antagonizes Tbx1/10 to promote cardiac versus pharyngeal muscle fate in the ascidian second heart field. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Razy-Krajka, F.; Lam, K.; Wang, W.; Stolfi, A.; Joly, M.; Bonneau, R.; Christiaen, L. Collier/OLF/EBF-Dependent Transcriptional Dynamics Control Pharyngeal Muscle Specification from Primed Cardiopharyngeal Progenitors. Dev. Cell 2014, 29, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Davidson, B.; Shi, W.; Beh, J.; Christiaen, L.; Levine, M. FGF signaling delineates the cardiac progenitor field in the simple chordate, Ciona intestinalis. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 2728–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Razy-Krajka, F.; Gravez, B.; Kaplan, N.; Racioppi, C.; Wang, W.; Christiaen, L. An FGF-driven feed-forward circuit patterns the cardiopharyngeal mesoderm in space and time. eLife 2018, 7, e29656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hotta, K.; Dauga, D.; Manni, L. The ontology of the anatomy and development of the solitary ascidian Ciona: The swimming larva and its metamorphosis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hotta, K.; Mitsuhara, K.; Takahashi, H.; Inaba, K.; Oka, K.; Gojobori, T.; Ikeo, K. A web-based interactive devel-opmental table for the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, including 3D real-image embryo reconstruc-tions: I. From fertilized egg to hatching larva. Dev. Dyn. 2007, 236, 1790–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Niu, X.; Stuart, T.; Jullian, E.; Mauck, W.M., III; Kelly, R.G.; Satija, R.; Christiaen, L. A single-cell transcriptional roadmap for cardiopharyngeal fate diversification. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 674–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamada, L.; Kobayashi, K.; Satou, Y.; Satoh, N. Microarray analysis of localization of maternal transcripts in eggs and early embryos of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Dev. Biol. 2005, 284, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brozovic, M.; Martin, C.; Dantec, C.; Dauga, D.; Mendez, M.; Simion, P.; Percher, M.; Laporte, B.; Scornavacca, C.; Di Gregorio, A.; et al. ANISEED 2015: A digital framework for the comparative developmental biology of ascidians. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D808–D818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blum, M.; Chang, H.-Y.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Kandasaamy, S.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Qureshi, M.; Raj, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D344–D354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D506–D515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gandhi, S.; Razy-Krajka, F.; Christiaen, L.; Stolfi, A. CRISPR Knockouts in Ciona Embryos. Transgenic Ascidians 2018, 1029, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stolfi, A.; Gandhi, S.; Salek, F.; Christiaen, L. Tissue-specific genome editing in Ciona embryos by CRISPR/Cas9. Development 2014, 141, 4115–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Haeussler, M.; Schönig, K.; Eckert, H.; Eschstruth, A.; Mianné, J.; Renaud, J.-B.; Schneider-Maunoury, S.; Shkumatava, A.; Teboul, L.; Kent, J.; et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gandhi, S.; Haeussler, M.; Razy-Krajka, F.; Christiaen, L.; Stolfi, A. Evaluation and rational design of guide RNAs for efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis in Ciona. Dev. Biol. 2017, 425, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Beh, J.; Shi, W.; Levine, M.; Davidson, B.; Christiaen, L. FoxF is essential for FGF-induced migration of heart pro-genitor cells in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Development 2007, 134, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Racioppi, C.; Wiechecki, A.K.; Christiaen, L. Combinatorial chromatin dynamics foster accurate cardiopharyngeal fate choices. eLife 2019, 8, e49921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mahon, P.; Bateman, A. The PA domain: A protease-associated domain. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 1930–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hong, S.-W.; Jin, D.-H.; Shin, J.-S.; Moon, J.-H.; Na, Y.-S.; Jung, K.-A.; Kim, S.-M.; Kim, J.C.; Kim, K.-P.; Hong, Y.S.; et al. Ring Finger Protein 149 Is an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Active on Wild-type v-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B1 (BRAF). J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 24017–24025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Keduka, E.; Kaiho, A.; Hamada, M.; Watanabe-Takano, H.; Takano, K.; Ogasawara, M.; Satou, Y.; Satoh, N.; Endo, T. M-Ras evolved independently of R-Ras and its neural function is conserved between mammalian and ascidian, which lacks classical Ras. Gene 2009, 429, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Miya, T.; Nishida, H. An Ets transcription factor, HrEts, is target of FGF signaling and involved in induction of notochord, mesenchyme, and brain in ascidian embryos. Dev. Biol. 2003, 261, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Christiaen, L.; Wagner, E.; Shi, W.; Levine, M. Isolation of sea squirt (Ciona) gametes, fertilization, dechorionation, and development. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, 2009, pdb-prot5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Racioppi, C.; Kamal, A.K.; Razy-Krajka, F.; Gambardella, G.; Zanetti, L.; di Bernardo, D.; Sanges, R.; Christiaen, L.A.; Ristoratore, F. Fibroblast growth factor signalling controls nervous system patterning and pigment cell formation in Ciona intestinalis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Christiaen, L.; Wagner, E.; Shi, W.; Levine, M. Isolation of Individual Cells and Tissues from Electroporated Sea Squirt (Ciona) Embryos by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, 2009, prot5349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, W.; Racioppi, C.; Gravez, B.; Christiaen, L. Purification of Fluorescent Labeled Cells from Dissociated Ciona Embryos. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1029, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, P.; Hung, L.-H.; Lloyd, W.; Yeung, K.Y. Hot-starting software containers for STAR aligner. Gigascience 2018, 7, giy092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Rnf149-rCRISPR causes ASM migration defects. (a) Schematic of Ciona development showing asymmetric cell divisions and resulting cell fates of the cardiopharyngeal mesoderm (CPM). Stages are set according to Hotta et al. (2007) with hours post fertilization (hpf) at 18 °C (Supplementary Table S2) [20,21]. Anterior tail muscle (ATM, gray), trunk ventral cell (TVC, green), secondary TVC (STVC, yellow), first heart precursor (FHP, red), second heart precursor (SHP, orange), atrial siphon muscle founder cells (ASMF, blue). Dashed lines indicate the ventral midline. (b) Schematic representation of phenotypes scored in Figure 1c. (c) TyrCRISPR used as control. Cardiopharyngeal lineage cells are marked by mCherry and GFP driven by Mesp. H2B::GFP (green) and hCD4::mCherry (red) accumulate in the nuclei and at the cell membrane, respectively. Arrow indicates the heart progenitors and the open arrow indicates the ASM ring. (d) Histogram with phenotype proportions. NeurogCRISPR are used as control, a gene that is known to be inactive in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. First 5 genes scored compared to NeurogCRISPR did not show significant differences (Fisher exact test), while Rnf149-rCRISPR differed from controls with p-value < 0.0001. Experiments were performed in biological replicates and “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions. (e) Corresponding histogram with phenotype proportions. Experiments are performed in biological replicates. “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions.
Figure 1. Rnf149-rCRISPR causes ASM migration defects. (a) Schematic of Ciona development showing asymmetric cell divisions and resulting cell fates of the cardiopharyngeal mesoderm (CPM). Stages are set according to Hotta et al. (2007) with hours post fertilization (hpf) at 18 °C (Supplementary Table S2) [20,21]. Anterior tail muscle (ATM, gray), trunk ventral cell (TVC, green), secondary TVC (STVC, yellow), first heart precursor (FHP, red), second heart precursor (SHP, orange), atrial siphon muscle founder cells (ASMF, blue). Dashed lines indicate the ventral midline. (b) Schematic representation of phenotypes scored in Figure 1c. (c) TyrCRISPR used as control. Cardiopharyngeal lineage cells are marked by mCherry and GFP driven by Mesp. H2B::GFP (green) and hCD4::mCherry (red) accumulate in the nuclei and at the cell membrane, respectively. Arrow indicates the heart progenitors and the open arrow indicates the ASM ring. (d) Histogram with phenotype proportions. NeurogCRISPR are used as control, a gene that is known to be inactive in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. First 5 genes scored compared to NeurogCRISPR did not show significant differences (Fisher exact test), while Rnf149-rCRISPR differed from controls with p-value < 0.0001. Experiments were performed in biological replicates and “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions. (e) Corresponding histogram with phenotype proportions. Experiments are performed in biological replicates. “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions.
Ijms 24 08865 g001
Figure 2. Rnf149-rCRISPR causes morphogenetic defects in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. (a) In situ hybridization using an Ebf probe (green). TyrCRISPR used as control. Cardiopharyngeal lineage are marked by mCherry driven by Mesp and revealed by mCherry antibody in red. H2B::mCherry accumulates in the nuclei. Scale bar is 50 μm. Arrows mark ASMFs. (b) Corresponding histogram with phenotype proportions. “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions.
Figure 2. Rnf149-rCRISPR causes morphogenetic defects in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. (a) In situ hybridization using an Ebf probe (green). TyrCRISPR used as control. Cardiopharyngeal lineage are marked by mCherry driven by Mesp and revealed by mCherry antibody in red. H2B::mCherry accumulates in the nuclei. Scale bar is 50 μm. Arrows mark ASMFs. (b) Corresponding histogram with phenotype proportions. “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions.
Ijms 24 08865 g002
Figure 3. Rnf149-r acts in parallel to the FGF/MAPK pathway. (a) Schematic representation of the FGF/MAPK pathway. (b) In situ hybridization using an Ebf probe. TyrCRISPR are used as control. Cardiopharyngeal lineage cells are marked by mCherry and beta-galactosidase/LacZ driven by Mesp and FoxF, revealed by anti mCherry and anti beta-galactosidase antibodies in magenta and cyan, respectively. H2B::mCherry and hCD4::mCherry (cyan) accumulate in the nuclei and at the cell membrane, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the ventral midline. Arrows mark the Atrial Siphon Muscle Founder cells (ASMFs). (c) Corresponding histogram with phenotype proportions. “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions.
Figure 3. Rnf149-r acts in parallel to the FGF/MAPK pathway. (a) Schematic representation of the FGF/MAPK pathway. (b) In situ hybridization using an Ebf probe. TyrCRISPR are used as control. Cardiopharyngeal lineage cells are marked by mCherry and beta-galactosidase/LacZ driven by Mesp and FoxF, revealed by anti mCherry and anti beta-galactosidase antibodies in magenta and cyan, respectively. H2B::mCherry and hCD4::mCherry (cyan) accumulate in the nuclei and at the cell membrane, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the ventral midline. Arrows mark the Atrial Siphon Muscle Founder cells (ASMFs). (c) Corresponding histogram with phenotype proportions. “n=” represents the total numbers of individual halves scored per condition. Error bars represent 95% Wilson method of confidence interval for proportions.
Ijms 24 08865 g003
Figure 4. Rnf149-r has novel targets contributing to the cell fate choices in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. (a) Volcano plot showing significantly upregulated and downregulated genes upon Rnf149-rCRISPR compared to control (TyrCRISPR) cardiopharyngeal lineage cells in red (FDR < 0.05). Genes shown in black are well-studied ASM-specific markers (Ebf1/2/3/4, Htr7 and Tbx1/10), and our target gene, Rnf149-r. Experiments are done in triplicates. (b) Log fold-change correlations between MAPK inhibition (Hand-r>FgfrDN) (Wang et al., 2019) and Rnf149-rCRISPR, using only differentially expressed genes in either condition. Genes shown in red are differentially expressed in the Rnf149-rCRISPR condition. R represents the Pearson correlation coefficient. (c) Euler diagram showing overlaps of differentially expressed gene groups in Rnf149-rCRISPR and Hand-r>FgfrDN. Mutual enrichment p-value, calculated using Fisher’s exact test, is 4.7 × 10−8. Odds ratio is calculated to be 3.3. (d) Proposed model of Rnf149-r’s effect on regulation of the cardiopharyngeal lineage in Ciona.
Figure 4. Rnf149-r has novel targets contributing to the cell fate choices in the cardiopharyngeal lineage. (a) Volcano plot showing significantly upregulated and downregulated genes upon Rnf149-rCRISPR compared to control (TyrCRISPR) cardiopharyngeal lineage cells in red (FDR < 0.05). Genes shown in black are well-studied ASM-specific markers (Ebf1/2/3/4, Htr7 and Tbx1/10), and our target gene, Rnf149-r. Experiments are done in triplicates. (b) Log fold-change correlations between MAPK inhibition (Hand-r>FgfrDN) (Wang et al., 2019) and Rnf149-rCRISPR, using only differentially expressed genes in either condition. Genes shown in red are differentially expressed in the Rnf149-rCRISPR condition. R represents the Pearson correlation coefficient. (c) Euler diagram showing overlaps of differentially expressed gene groups in Rnf149-rCRISPR and Hand-r>FgfrDN. Mutual enrichment p-value, calculated using Fisher’s exact test, is 4.7 × 10−8. Odds ratio is calculated to be 3.3. (d) Proposed model of Rnf149-r’s effect on regulation of the cardiopharyngeal lineage in Ciona.
Ijms 24 08865 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vitrinel, B.; Vogel, C.; Christiaen, L. Ring Finger 149-Related Is an FGF/MAPK-Independent Regulator of Pharyngeal Muscle Fate Specification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108865

AMA Style

Vitrinel B, Vogel C, Christiaen L. Ring Finger 149-Related Is an FGF/MAPK-Independent Regulator of Pharyngeal Muscle Fate Specification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(10):8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108865

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vitrinel, Burcu, Christine Vogel, and Lionel Christiaen. 2023. "Ring Finger 149-Related Is an FGF/MAPK-Independent Regulator of Pharyngeal Muscle Fate Specification" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 10: 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108865

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop