Next Article in Journal
Sequence and Evolutionary Features for the Alternatively Spliced Exons of Eukaryotic Genes
Next Article in Special Issue
Obesity Has a Systemic Effect on Immune Cells in Naïve and Cancer-Bearing Mice
Previous Article in Journal
A Narrative Role of Vitamin D and Its Receptor: With Current Evidence on the Gastric Tissues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance for Predicting the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Curative Treatment
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Current Knowledge of the Potential Links between Inflammation and Prostate Cancer

Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy
Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Busto Arsizio, Italy
Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(15), 3833;
Submission received: 29 May 2019 / Revised: 28 July 2019 / Accepted: 5 August 2019 / Published: 6 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammation and Cancer 2018)


Inflammation is inherent in prostatic diseases and it is now accepted that it may facilitate cellular proliferation in both benign and malignant conditions. The strong relationship between prostatic inflammation and pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is supported by epidemiologic, histopathologic and molecular evidence. Contrariwise, the role of inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis is still controversial, although current data indicate that the inflammatory microenvironment can regulate prostate cancer (PCa) growth and progression. Knowledge of the complex molecular landscape associated with chronic inflammation in the context of PCa may lead to the introduction and optimization of novel targeted therapies. In this perspective, evaluation of the inflammatory component in prostate specimens could be included in routine pathology reports.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa), one of the most challenging malignancies in urologic oncology, is a very inhomogeneous disease. Advanced age, African descent, family history, and genetic mutations are well established risk factors but the mechanisms responsible for the development and progression of PCa have not yet been fully elucidated [1,2,3]. Several authors have focused their attention on the role of inflammation in the development of PCa based on the hypothesis that inflammatory injury could prompt carcinogenesis by causing cellular stress and repeated genomic damage [3,4,5]. This hypothesis has been extended from bench to bedside and numerous clinical studies have investigated the association between prostatitis and PCa without, however, reaching a universally accepted agreement [3]. While some authors have demonstrated an increased risk of PCa among men with previous prostatitis [6], others claim that prostatic inflammation may confer a protective effect and decrease the rate of subsequent PCa [7,8]. The latest systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between prostatitis and PCa has recently been compiled by Perletti and co-workers, who reported a significant increase in the odds of prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients with a history of clinical chronic prostatitis [3]. Their findings confirmed a previous meta-analysis by Jiang et al. establishing a correlation between clinical prostatitis and PCa [9].
This review attempts to discuss peer-reviewed data on the role of inflammation in PCa focusing on the following issues:
What is the prevalence of prostate inflammation in the general population and PCa patients?
What is the role of histologically demonstrated inflammation in PCa development and progression?
How can prostate inflammation be detected in everyday clinical practice?

2. Acquisition of Evidence

Search strategy and study selection:
Our research started with the latest meta-analysis performed by Perletti et al. in 2018 and was then extended to January 2019 to include all published papers assessing the role of asymptomatic and histologically confirmed prostatic inflammation in PCa genesis and progression [3]. Data extraction was carried out by consulting the most important international databases and trial registers, such as Medline, PreMedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Scopus, OpenGrey, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry and No systematic review or meta-analysis was accomplished.

3. Findings

3.1. What Is the Prevalence of Prostate Inflammation in the General Population and PCa Patients?

It is common knowledge that the prevalence of inflammation is very high within the adult prostate. The REduction by DUtasteride of PCa Events (REDUCE) trial demonstrated that 77.6% of all prostate biopsies exhibited inflammatory tissue and, of these, the majority (89%) had mild chronic inflammation [10]. Evidence of prostatic inflammatory tissue has been gathered not only from prostate biopsies, but also from radical prostatectomy specimens and tissue removed at transurethal resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Some authors outlined a prevalence of prostatic inflammation in the general population ranging from 33% to 100% [11,12]. Recently, Murtola and co-workers reported that 91.6% of PCa patients in the finasteride arm had at least one biopsy core with inflammation in benign areas, highlighting the high prevalence of inflammation associated with PCa [13]. This raises the following questions:
What are the cellular components of prostate inflammation?
What are the pathologic features of prostate inflammation?
What are the causes of prostate inflammation?

3.2. Cellular Components of Prostate Inflammation

Chronic inflammation is a common finding in malignant prostate tissue; the inflammatory infiltrate primarily consists of T lymphocytes, macrophages and, less frequently, plasma cells and eosinophils [12]. Miller et al. showed that the number of CD4 + CD25high regulatory T cells (Treg) is markedly increased in both tumor tissue and peripheral blood of patients with early-stage PCa [14]. The available evidence confirms that the presence of infiltrating Treg, in PCa has significant implications in immunotherapy strategy planning. In addition, CD204+ macrophages and CD3+ T lymphocytes play a key role in tumor development, with the highest number of CD3+ cells being detected in PCa, and gradually decreasing in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) towards the lowest number in BPH [15].
Histologically, the prostate epithelium can be injured by numerous environmental factors such as inflammatory disorders. Procarcinogenic inflammatory processes may promote cell transformation, mediated by transcription factor NF-kB activation that leads to the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 [16].
Currently, an evolving class of inflammasomes is deemed to be the master regulator of inflammation. Inflammasomes are a group of multimeric proteins consisting of NLR protein, an apoptosis-associated speck-like protein, which contains a carboxyterminal CARD (ASC), and procaspase-1 [17,18,19]. A wide variety of biologic effects associated with infection and inflammation are caused by the assembly of inflammasome complex, which activates caspase-1, and causes the secretion and maturation of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-1 [17,20]. NLRP3 is one of the most studied inflammasomes [17]. In a model of chemical-induced carcinogenesis, Chow et al. demonstrated that in NLRP3-deficient mice display significantly reduced tumor burden compared to control wild-type mice. Indeed, NLRP3 deficiency induces NK cell infiltration and is associated with increased CCL5 and CXCL9 chemokine production [21] As a result of limited evidence, the contribution of inflammasomes to regulating prostate inflammation is still controversial. However, investigation into the role of inflammasomes may offer novel therapeutic options to target the complexities of inflammatory pathways [17].
Moreover, Sorrentino et al. demonstrated the role of IL30 in regulating prostate cancer stem-like cell behavior and metastatic potential, highlighting that IL-30 overproduction promoted tumor onset and development associated with increased proliferation, vascularization and myeloid cell recruitment [22]. IL-30 appears to have a pro-inflammatory potential since, just as IL-6, it is known to signal via IL-6Rα, by recruiting a gp130 protein receptor homodimer [23]. In this sense, inflammatory microenvironment may play a decisive role in promoting PCa development, progression and metastasis, although future studies are mandatory to understand this correlation more thoroughly.

3.3. Histopathologic Characteristics of Prostate Inflammation

In the pathology report, the term “prostatitis” describes the presence of inflammatory cells within the prostatic parenchyma, and cell types constituting the infiltrate (i.e., neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages) are given [24]. However, pathologists may tend to overlook prostatic inflammatory infiltrates unless particularly florid, since their clinical relevance remain largely undefined [24]. Moreover, while prostate biopsies with no interstitial inflammatory cells virtually do not exist, the point beyond which the prostate should be considered “inflamed” has not been fully established, nor any standardized reporting system for prostatitis routinely practiced.
Since the late-sixties, several clinico-pathologic studies have explored the presence of inflammation in prostate specimens within various clinical settings, adopting different criteria to describe pathologic features of inflammatory infiltrates [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
Although the three primary locations of prostatic inflammation (i.e., glandular, periglandular and stromal) are generally recognized, no consensus has been reached regarding quantification of extent and grade of inflammation, neither has any consistent correlation emerged with clinical syndromes or symptoms. Various classification systems were published between 1991 and 2001 (see Supplementary Materials).
In 1991, Brawn and co-workers evaluated a series of clinically benign whole-mount prostate specimens obtained at autopsy, to establish whether any link existed between histologic findings and prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations. They categorized prostate inflammatory infiltrates as minimal, moderate or severe, but did not distinguish between acute and chronic inflammation. Severe inflammation was capable of elevating PSA levels (higher than 4 ng/mL) independent of other histologic findings [29].
In a large series of prostate needle biopsies obtained from men without PCa, Nadler et al. analyzed duration and type of infiltrating inflammatory cells, differentiating acute from chronic inflammation, which was graded on a 3-tiered scale: 0-none, 1-low grade and 2-high grade. Acute inflammation contributed the most to PSA elevation [31].
In 1997, Irani and co-workers, while attempting to correlate pre-biopsy serum and urinary PSA concentrations with morphologic characteristics of inflammation in benign prostatic biopsies, defined a 4-point scale for describing inflammatory infiltrates in terms of extension and aggressiveness [32]. This grading system did not include the types of inflammatory cells composing the infiltrate. The authors found no association between prostatic subclinical inflammation and high urinary PSA, nor any correlation between the bulk of prostatic inflammatory infiltrate and serum PSA concentration, except in the case of glandular epithelial disruption [32]. Subsequently, the same authors, having investigated the prognostic value of prostatic stromal inflammation in surgically treated localized PCa, proposed two categories of aggressiveness to describe prostate inflammation, low-grade and high-grade. Patients with high-grade inflammation surrounding malignant glands had significantly more postoperative biochemical recurrence than patients with low-grade inflammation [35].
Some investigators characterized prostatic inflammatory infiltrates by means of immunohistochemistry [36,37]. Anim et al. localized the different types of inflammatory cells in prostate specimens with acute/chronic active/chronic inactive prostatitis, to determine the sequence of events in the cellular response. They concluded that the reaction to prostatic injury/stimuli is initiated by macrophages, probably related to PSA, prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) and other antigenic molecules that are normally present in prostatic secretion draining into the periglandular tissues. T-lymphocytes are then recruited to participate in the inflammatory response and accumulate around the damaged glands, whereas B-cell recruitment only occurs later [36].
Considering prostate histopathology in a series of patients affected by chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, True et al. analyzed prostatic inflammation for extent (on a 3-point scale), anatomic location (glandular, periglandular, stromal) and distribution (focal, multifocal, diffuse) of inflammatory cells. These authors, among the first to systematically characterize inflammation of the prostate, found that the degree of inflammation was minimal to absent in over 95% of cases and that severe inflammation was infrequent [33].
Conversely, according to Nickel et al., prostatic inflammation is an extremely common finding in BPH patients with no history or symptoms of prostatitis. The authors examined histologic sections from TURP specimens, using an immunostain for leukocyte-common antigen and a computerized image-analysis system, to assess the pattern of distribution and intensity of inflammatory infiltrates, following the model of Irani and co-workers. Neither total PSA nor PSA density showed a significant correlation with the extent, grade or location of inflammation [34].
In 2001, Nickel and co-workers, with the contribution of the participants of the North American Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network (CPCRN) and the International Prostatitis Collaborative Network (IPCN), proposed a consensus classification system of chronic prostatic inflammation, based on previously published critical research, describing inflammatory patterns in prostate specimens from patients with BPH [24]. Inflammatory infiltrates should be evaluated according to their location, extent and grade (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Of note, no consensus was reached on the frequency, relevance and classification of granulomatous inflammation; however, it was agreed to record its extent, location and severity (Figure 3). These authors reported several distinct, although often coexisting, patterns of chronic inflammation in the prostate, the most common being a lymphocytic infiltrate in the stroma adjacent to the prostatic acini with a less prominent intraepithelial component [27,33,34].
Periglandular inflammation is usually patchy and, the peripheral zone is more frequently affected, although other regions of the prostate can be involved [38,39]. Intensity can vary markedly, from scattered lymphocytes to dense lymphoid nodules or secondary follicles with germinal centers. In cases with copious periglandular inflammatory cells, the degree of epithelial infiltration may be higher and effects on the epithelial cells more noticeable, with the basal cells appearing more resistant to inflammatory damage [24]. Periglandular inflammatory infiltrates often consist of a mixed population of B and predominating T lymphocytes [40,41]. Macrophages also occur in significant numbers both in glands and in the periglandular stroma, while plasma cells are less common.
An accepted, standardized scaffold to describe prostatic inflammation will prove useful in better elucidating asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis associated with BPH, PCa and infertility [42,43].

3.4. What Is the Role of Histologically Demonstrated Inflammation in PCa Development and Progression?

Preclinical studies provide a biologic rationale linking inflammation and the risk of PCa, but a direct relationship between inflammation and malignant transformation of human prostate is still under debate [44,45]. It has been hypothesized that immunologic response, induced by chronic prostatic inflammation, promotes tissue damage and subsequent repair, which may lead to enlargement and cancer vulnerability of the gland. After conducting a meta-analysis on 11 case-control studies published between 1971 and 1996, Dennis and co-workers showed an increased risk of PCa among men with a history of prostatitis [6]. Conversely, the first study to prospectively assess the linkage between prostatitis and PCa, performed by Sutcliffe et al. in 2006, failed to demonstrate any statistical correlation although a positive association was observed among younger men screened for PCa [46]. Moreover, in a cohort of 4526 men undergoing prostate biopsy, Karakiewicz et al. reported a protective effect of inflammation and decrease in the rate of subsequent PCa [7]. Along this line, the Finnish PCa screening trial [8] and the REDUCE study [47] showed PCa lower rates and decreased risk of PCa at 2-year repeat biopsy in patients with prostatic inflammation, respectively. On the other hand, a prospective study by Cheng et al. on 68,675 men revealed that a personal history of prostatitis and prolonged prostatitis symptoms can significantly increase the odds of PCa [48]. Compiling the results from all clinical trials published from May 1990 to July 2012, Jiang et al. confirmed that there is a positive relationship between clinical prostatitis and PCa [9]. The latest evidence on the role of prostatitis in the development and progression of PCa was gathered by Perletti et al. in 2017 [3]. This meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies showed a significant association between PCa and exposure to prostatitis, fostering investigation as to whether aggressive therapeutic management of chronic prostatitis syndromes could be instrumental in the prevention of cancer.
Recently, Aykan and co-workers revealed a correlation between male accessory gland infection (MAGI) and PCa in a case-control study [49]. They also observed that men with MAGI have a higher risk of clinically significant or high-grade PCa. In patients with a positive biopsy after an initial negative baseline biopsy, Kuang et al. demonstrated that acute and chronic inflammation is related to a lower prevalence of perineural invasion, although the mechanism for this association remains unclear [50].

3.5. What Are the Causes of Prostate Inflammation?

Several factors, including pathogens, diet, mechanical and chemical trauma, can trigger the clinical condition of prostatitis. The most common causes of prostate inflammation fall under infectious and noninfectious etiology.

3.5.1. Infectious Etiology

Bacterial prostatitis is mainly secondary to Gram-negative uropathogens, although Gram-positive and sexually transmitted pathogens have also been identified as causative agents. Over the last few years, Cai et al. have reported a significant increase in the prevalence of Gram-positive strains in patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis, highlighting the role of atypical microorganisms in the onset of infections, probably due to the more frequent use of antibiotics [51] Chlamydia trachomatis has also been identified as an important pathogen in chronic prostatitis, with a serious impact on patient quality of life [52].
Bacteria produce protein toxins that could act as carcinogenetic stimuli [53]. Toxin-mediated carcinogenesis can occur in multiple ways, by affecting genomic instability, resistance to cell death and proliferative signaling [54].

3.5.2. Noninfectious Etiology

Noninfectious causes can also lead to the development of prostate inflammation. Several authors have focused their attention on the role of diet, changes in serum testosterone and estrogen levels, autoimmunity, smoking and reflux of noxious chemicals in the urine. Metabolic syndrome and metabolic alterations also feature among noninfectious causes of prostate inflammation [41,42,43]. A high-fat diet can induce a significant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines through activation of the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT)-3, and Nuclear Factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) pathways. Both these pathways are involved in the transcriptional regulation of genes related to proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, invasion, and inflammation within the prostate [55,56]. In addition, several studies have shown that estrogens are implicated in the induction of inflammatory disease of the prostate in rats, suggesting that steroids modulate the immune response [57]. Table 1 lists circulating and in situ inflammatory factors detected in PCa patients [22,58,59,60,61,62,63,64].

3.6. How Can Prostate Inflammation Be Detected in Everyday Clinical Practice?

As mentioned above, Perletti et al. showed that a history of clinical chronic prostatitis can significantly increase the odds for PCa of any grade (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.43 to 2.35), however, in prostatitis patients, who undergo more frequent urologic consultation and instrumentation, there is a strong probability of detecting indolent clinically irrelevant cancers [3]. The overlap of prostatitis and other urologic diseases, such as BPH, should also be taken into account. Indeed, reporting chronic prostatitis is subjective and symptoms related to prostatitis and BPH (likely prevalent in older subjects) may be difficult to distinguish. Since epidemiologic studies suggest an association between chronic inflammation and the risk of PCa, an aggressive diagnostic approach to chronic prostatitis as cancer-preventive strategy is crucial. Biopsy is the golden standard to detect the presence of inflammatory tissue in the prostate, however, it can only be performed in patients with suspected PCa [65]. In addition, there is a high prevalence of chronic prostatic inflammation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH, who are not candidates for prostate biopsy. Ficarra and co-workers proposed several parameters to be used in everyday clinical practice when suspecting prostatic inflammation [65]: laboratory parameters (e.g., cytokines), clinical parameters (e.g., prostatic calcifications, symptom severity, and response to therapy).
Laboratory parameters include interleukin-8 (IL-8), a proinflammatory cytokine produced by prostate epithelial cells. IL-8 promotes proliferation of prostate stromal cells in an autocrine/paracrine manner and is a potential link between chronic inflammation and prostate enlargement [63]. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) is another potential biomarker of prostatic inflammation. In prostatic secretion, MCP-1 levels have been shown to positively correlate with prostate volume and mRNA levels of the macrophage marker CD68 [64]. These are both promising biomarkers, although more robust evidence from prospective clinical studies is warranted before introducing predictive biomarkers into routine clinical practice to assist diagnosis and surveillance of chronic prostatic inflammation [64].
Prostatic calcifications are a common finding during transrectal prostate ultrasound in both healthy subjects and patients undergoing prostate biopsy. It is generally accepted that their incidence increases with age [66], they are somehow related to chronic prostatitis or chronic pelvic pain syndrome in young men [67,68], and appear to play an important role in LUTS [69]. Their etiopathogenesis is not yet fully understood. Some authors have demonstrated that microbial biofilms are critical in the genesis of prostate calcifications [68], while others report that prostatic calcifications, leading to obstruction of intraprostatic ducts, may result from prostatic fluid alteration and, in turn, induce chronic inflammation [70]. The inflammatory response is characterized by T-lymphocyte infiltration, activation and upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, as well as increased expression of stromal and epithelial growth factors following abnormal prostate cell proliferation [63]. In this respect, calcifications are a clinical demonstration of prostatic inflammation.
A statistically significant correlation between chronic prostatic inflammation and total, irritative and obstructive symptoms has been shown by several authors [10]. In a cohort study of 82 patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle prostate biopsy, Kwon and co-workers demonstrated that patients with high-grade chronic inflammation have significantly lower changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) than patients with low-grade inflammation over the 12-month follow-up period [71]. Moreover, patients with low-grade inflammation benefitted from continuous improvement of storage symptoms until 12 months after therapy with alpha-1 blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors [5-ARIs]. No surgery was required in the low-grade group, while four patients (9.1%) in the high-grade group underwent transurethral resection [71]. These findings imply that the use of alpha blockers, with or without 5-ARIs, may not be sufficient to decrease symptom severity in patients with high-grade inflammation.
Several authors have found that serum IL-6 levels are elevated in patients with untreated metastatic or castration-resistant PCa and correlate negatively with tumor survival and response to chemotherapy [59]. Furthermore, a substantial body of evidence suggests that IL-6 plays a major role in the transition from hormone dependency to castration-resistant PCa, most notably through accessory activation of the androgen receptor [59]. Prostate inflammation, through IL-6 and IL-6-related pathways, thus seems to be crucial in metastatic or castration-resistant PCa, although further validation is needed on the use of anti-inflammatory drugs in patient management.

4. Clinical Remarks

Chronic inflammation contributes to the onset and progression of human cancer via modifications in the tumor microenvironment, by remodeling the extracellular matrix and initiating epithelial mesenchymal transition [72]. The latest reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate a strong correlation between a history of clinical chronic prostatitis and PCa development in the general population [3]. Causes of prostate inflammation vary from bacteria triggering prostatitis and sexually-transmitted diseases, estrogen hormone imbalance, physical trauma, urine reflux to the prostate gland, and environmental factors such as diet [73,74]. Although prostate biopsy is the golden standard method for diagnosing prostate inflammation, several parameters, such as laboratory biomarkers (cytokines) and/or clinical parameters (prostatic calcifications, severity of symptoms, and response to therapy), could be used in everyday clinical practice when prostate inflammation is suspected [65]. Figure 4 shows the impact of prostatic inflammation and inflammatory mediators on tumor initiation, growth and progression.
One important question still remains unanswered: would preventive anti-inflammatory treatment efficiently avoid or delay the development of PCa in high-risk patients? Based on data from the EPIdemiology of Prostate Cancer (EPICAP) study, designed to investigate the role of environmental and genetic factors in PCa, Doat et al. recently reported a decreased risk of PCa in men treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, particularly those with anti-COX-2 activity [75]. They also stated that the protective effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs seems to be more pronounced in aggressive PCa and in men with a personal history of prostatitis.
Further studies are needed to identify definitive clinical markers for prostate inflammation diagnosis and enable optimization of novel therapeutic modalities for the treatment of high-risk PCa patients.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, T.C., I.T. and G.P.; writing—review and editing, R.S., I.C.G. and G.N.; supervision, T.C., T.E.B.J. and G.N.


This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


  1. Rebbeck, T.R. Prostate cancer genetics: Variation by race, ethnicity, and geography. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2017, 27, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Modena, A.; Iacovelli, R.; Scarpa, A.; Brunelli, M.; Ciccarese, C.; Fantinel, E.; Bimbatti, D.; Massari, F.; Martignoni, G.; Tortora, G. Investigating BRCA mutations: A breakthrough in precision medicine of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Target. Oncol. 2016, 11, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Perletti, G.; Monti, E.; Magri, V.; Cai, T.; Cleves, A.; Trinchieri, A.; Montanari, E. The association between prostatitis and prostate cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2017, 89, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Davidsson, S.; Fiorentino, M.; Andrén, O.; Fang, F.; Mucci, L.A.; Varenhorst, E.; Fall, K.; Rider, J.R. Inflammation, focal atrophic lesions, and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with respect to risk of lethal prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2011, 20, 2280–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Boehm, K.; Valdivieso, R.; Meskawi, M.; Larcher, A.; Schiffmann, J.; Sun, M.; Graefen, M.; Saad, F.; Parent, M.É.; Karakiewicz, P.I. Prostatitis, other genitourinary infections and prostate cancer: Results from a population based case-control study. World J. Urol. 2016, 34, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dennis, L.K.; Lynch, C.F.; Torner, J.C. Epidemiologic association between prostatitis and prostate cancer. Urology 2002, 60, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karakiewicz, P.I.; Benayoun, S.; Begin, L.R.; Duclos, A.; Valiquette, L.; McCormack, M.; Bénard, F.; Saad, F.; Perrotte, P. Chronic inflammation is negatively associated with prostate cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2007, 61, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yli-Hemminki, T.H.; Laurila, M.; Auvinen, A.; Määttänen, L.; Huhtala, H.; Tammela, T.L.; Kujala, P.M. Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial. BJU Int. 2013, 112, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Liu, J.; Pumill, C. The role of prostatitis in prostate cancer: Meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e85179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nickel, J.C.; Roehrborn, C.G.; O’Leary, M.P.; Bostwick, D.G.; Somerville, M.C.; Rittmaster, R.S. The relationship between prostate inflammation and lower urinary tract symptoms: Examination of baseline data from the REDUCE trial. Eur. Urol. 2008, 54, 1379–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Schatteman, P.H.; Hoekx, L.; Wyndaele, J.J.; Jeuris, W.; Van Marck, E. Inflammation in prostate biopsies of men without prostatic malignancy or clinical prostatitis: Correlation with total serum PSA and PSA density. Eur. Urol. 2000, 37, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sfanos, K.S.; De Marzo, A.M. Prostate cancer and inflammation: The evidence. Histopathology 2012, 60, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Murtola, T.J.; Gurel, B.; Umbehr, M.; Lucia, M.S.; Thompson, I.M., Jr.; Goodman, P.J.; Kristal, A.R.; Parnes, H.L.; Lippman, S.M.; Sutcliffe, S.; et al. Inflammation in benign prostate tissue and prostate cancer in the finasteride arm of the prostate cancer prevention trial. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2016, 25, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miller, A.M.; Lundberg, K.; Ozenci, V.; Banham, A.H.; Hellström, M.; Egevad, L.; Pisa, P. CD4 + CD25high T cells are enriched in the tumor and peripheral blood of prostate cancer patients. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 7398–7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Burdova, A.; Rulisek, P.; Bouchal, J.; Král, M.; Student, V.; Kolar, Z. Infiltration of prostate cancer by CD204+ and CD3+ cells correlates with ERG expression and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion. Klin. Onkol. 2018, 31, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nguyen, D.P.; Li, J.; Yadav, S.S.; Tewari, A.K. Recent insights into NF-kappaB signalling pathways and the link between inflammation and prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2014, 114, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Karan, D.; Dubey, S. From inflammation to prostate cancer: The role of inflammasomes. Adv. Urol. 2016, 2016, 3140372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schroder, K.J.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasomes. Cell 2010, 140, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, G.; Nunez, G. Inflammasomes in intestinal inflammation and cancer. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 1986–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fabbi, M.; Carbotti, G.; Ferrini, S. Context-dependent role of IL-18 in cancer biology and counter-regulation by IL-18BP. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015, 97, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chow, M.T.; Sceneay, J.; Paget, C.; Wong, C.S.; Duret, H.; Tschopp, J.; Möller, A.; Smyth, M.J. NLRP3 suppresses NK cell-mediated responses to carcinogen-induced tumors and metastases. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5721–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sorrentino, C.; Ciummo, S.L.; Cipollone, G.; Caputo, S.; Bellone, M.; Di Carlo, E. Interleukin-30/IL27p28 shapes prostate cancer stem-like cell behavior and is critical for tumor onset and metastasization. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 2654–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Garbers, C.; Spudy, B.; Aparicio-Siegmund, S.; Waetzig, G.H.; Sommer, J.; Hölscher, C.; Rose-John, S.; Grötzinger, J.; Lorenzen, I.; Scheller, J. An interleukin-6 receptor-dependent molecular switch mediates signal transduction of the IL-27 cytokine subunit p28 (IL-30) via a gp130 protein receptor homodimer. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 4346–4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nickel, J.C.; True, L.D.; Krieger, J.N.; Berger, R.E.; Boag, A.H.; Young, I.D. Consensus development of a histopathological classification system for chronic prostatic inflammation. BJU Int. 2001, 87, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schmidt, J.D.; Patterson, M.C. Needle biopsy study of chronic prostatitis. J. Urol. 1966, 96, 519–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nielsen, M.L.; Asnaes, S.; Hattel, T. Inflammatory changes in the non-infected prostate gland. A clinical, microbiological and histological investigation. J. Urol. 1973, 110, 423–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kohnen, P.W.; Drach, G.W. Patterns of inflammation in prostatic hyperplasia: A histologic and bacteriologic study. J. Urol. 1979, 121, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doble, A.; Thomas, B.J.; Furr, P.M.; Walker, M.M.; Harris, J.R.; Witherow, R.O.; Taylor-Robinson, D. A search for infectious agents in chronic abacterial prostatitis using ultrasound guided biopsy. Br. J. Urol. 1989, 64, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brawn, P.N.; Speights, V.O.; Kuhl, D.; Riggs, M.; Spiekerman, A.M.; McCord, R.G.; Coffield, K.S.; Stewart, D.T.; Lind, M.L. Prostate-specific antigen levels from completely sectioned, clinically benign, whole prostates. Cancer 1991, 68, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bare, R.; Hart, L.; McCullough, D.L. Correlation of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density with outcome of prostate biopsy. Urology 1994, 43, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nadler, R.B.; Humphrey, P.A.; Smith, D.S.; Catalona, W.J.; Ratliff, T.L. Effect of inflammation and benign prostatic hyperplasia on elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels. J. Urol. 1995, 154, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Irani, J.; Levillain, P.; Goujon, J.M.; Bon, D.; Doré, B.; Aubert, J. Inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Correlation with prostate specific antigen value. J. Urol. 1997, 157, 1301–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. True, L.D.; Berger, R.E.; Rothman, I.; Ross, S.O.; Krieger, J.N. Prostate histopathology and the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A prospective biopsy study. J. Urol. 1999, 162, 2014–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nickel, J.C.; Downey, J.; Young, I.; Boag, S. Asymptomatic inflammation and/or infection in benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 1999, 84, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Irani, J.; Goujon, J.M.; Ragni, E.; Peyrat, L.; Hubert, J.; Saint, F.; Mottet, N. High-grade inflammation in prostate cancer as a prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Pathologist Multi Center Study Group. Urology 1999, 54, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Anim, J.T.; Udo, C.; John, B. Characterisation of inflammatory cells in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Acta Histochem. 1998, 100, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Blumenfeld, W.; Tucci, S.; Narayan, P. Incidental lymphocytic prostatitis. Selective involvement with nonmalignant glands. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1992, 16, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Attah, E. Nonspecific inflammatory lesions of the prostate. Spectrum and patterns. Int. Surg. 1975, 60, 158–162. [Google Scholar]
  39. McNeal, J.E. The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate 1981, 2, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McClinton, S.; Eremin, O.; Miller, I.D. Inflammatory infiltrate in prostatic hyperplasia–Evidence of a host response to intraprostatic spermatozoa. Br. J. Urol. 1990, 65, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. McClinton, S.; Miller, I.D.; Eremin, O. An immunohistochemical characterisation of the inflammatory cell infiltrate in benign and malignant prostatic disease. Br. J. Cancer 1990, 61, 400–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Vignozzi, L.; Cellai, I.; Santi, R.; Lombardelli, L.; Morelli, A.; Comeglio, P.; Filippi, S.; Logiodice, F.; Carini, M.; Nesi, G.; et al. Antiinflammatory effect of androgen receptor activation in human benign prostatic hyperplasia cells. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 214, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Vignozzi, L.; Gacci, M.; Cellai, I.; Santi, R.; Corona, G.; Morelli, A.; Rastrelli, G.; Comeglio, P.; Sebastanelli, A.; Maneschi, E.; et al. Fat boosts, while androgen receptor activation counteracts, BPH-associated prostate inflammation. Prostate 2013, 73, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gandaglia, G.; Zaffuto, E.; Fossati, N.; Cucchiara, V.; Mirone, V.; Montorsi, F.; Briganti, A. The role of prostatic inflammation in the development and progression of benign and malignant diseases. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2017, 27, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. De Nunzio, C.; Kramer, G.; Marberger, M.; Montironi, R.; Nelson, W.; Schröder, F.; Sciarra, A.; Tubaro, A. The controversial relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: The role of inflammation. Eur. Urol. 2011, 60, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sutcliffe, S.; Giovannucci, E.; De Marzo, A.M.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Willett, W.C.; Platz, E.A. Gonorrhea, syphilis, clinical prostatitis, and the risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2006, 15, 2160–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moreira, D.M.; Nickel, J.C.; Gerber, L.; Muller, R.L.; Andriole, G.L.; Castro-Santamaria, R.; Freedland, S.J. Baseline prostate inflammation is associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat prostate biopsy: Results from the REDUCE study. Cancer 2014, 120, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cheng, I.; Witte, J.S.; Jacobsen, S.J.; Haque, R.; Quinn, V.P.; Quesenberry, C.P.; Caan, B.J.; Van Den Eeden, S.K. Prostatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and prostate cancer: The California Men’s Health Study. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Aykan, S.; Temiz, M.Z.; Yilmaz, M.; Ulus, I.; Yuruk, E.; Muslumanoglu, A.Y. Association between male accesory gland infections and prostate cancer in Turkish men: A case-control study. Andrologia 2018, 8, e13038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kuang, A.G.; Nickel, J.C.; Andriole, G.L.; Castro-Santamaria, R.; Freedland, S.J.; Moreira, D.M. Both acute and chronic inflammation are associated with less perineural invasion in men with prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. BJU Int. 2019, 123, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cai, T.; Mazzoli, S.; Meacci, F.; Boddi, V.; Mondaini, N.; Malossini, G.; Bartoletti, R. Epidemiological features and resistance pattern in uropathogens isolated from chronic bacterial prostatitis. J. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cai, T.; Pisano, F.; Magri, V.; Verze, P.; Mondaini, N.; D’Elia, C.; Malossini, G.; Mazzoli, S.; Perletti, G.; Gontero, P.; et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection is related to premature ejaculation in chronic prostatitis patients: Results from a cross-sectional study. J. Sex. Med. 2014, 11, 3085–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Van Elsland, D.; Neefjes, J. Bacterial infections and cancer. EMBO Rep. 2018, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rosadi, F.; Fiorentini, C.; Fabbri, A. Bacterial protein toxins in human cancers. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Moreira, D.M.; Nickel, J.C.; Gerber, L.; Muller, R.L.; Andriole, G.L.; Castro-Santamaria, R.; Freedland, S.J. Smoking is associated with acute and chronic prostatic inflammation: Results from the REDUCE study. Cancer Prev. Res. 2015, 8, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shankar, E.; Bhaskaran, N.; MacLennan, G.T.; Liu, G.; Daneshgari, F.; Gupta, S. Inflammatory signaling involved in high-fat diet induced prostate diseases. J. Urol. Res. 2015, 2, 1018. [Google Scholar]
  57. De Marzo, A.M.; Nelson, W.G.; Isaacs, W.B.; Epstein, J.I. Pathological and molecular aspects of prostate cancer. Lancet 2003, 361, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Voronov, E.; Shouval, D.S.; Krelin, Y.; Cagnano, E.; Benharroch, D.; Iwakura, Y.; Dinarello, C.A.; Apte, R.N. IL-1 is required for tumor invasiveness and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 2645–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Nguyen, D.P.; Li, J.; Tewari, A.K. Inflammation and prostate cancer: The role of interleukin 6 (IL-6). BJU Int. 2014, 113, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Steiner, G.E.; Newman, M.E.; Paikl, D.; Stix, U.; Memaran-Dagda, N.; Lee, C.; Marberger, M.J. Expression and function of pro-inflammatory interleukin IL-17 and IL-17 receptor in normal, benign hyperplastic, and malignant prostate. Prostate 2003, 56, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Michalaki, V.; Syrigos, K.; Charles, P.; Waxman, J. Serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha correlate with clinicopathological features and patient survival in patients with prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 90, 2312–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Park, J.I.; Lee, M.G.; Cho, K.; Park, B.J.; Chae, K.S.; Byun, D.S.; Ryu, B.K.; Park, Y.K.; Chi, S.G. Transforming growth factor-beta1 activates interleukin-6 expression in prostate cancer cells through the synergistic collaboration of the Smad2, p38-NF-kappaB, JNK, and Ras signaling pathways. Oncogene 2003, 22, 4314–4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, L.; Li, Q.; Han, P.; Li, X.; Zeng, H.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, Q. Evaluation of interleukin-8 in expressed prostatic secretion as a reliable biomarker of inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2009, 74, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fujita, K.; Ewing, C.M.; Getzenberg, R.H.; Parsons, J.K.; Isaacs, W.B.; Pavlovich, C.P. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) is associated with prostatic growth dysregulation and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 2010, 70, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ficarra, V.; Sekulovic, S.; Zattoni, F.; Zazzera, M.; Novara, G. Why and how to evaluate chronic prostatic inflammation. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2013, 12, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Klimas, R.; Bennett, B.; Gardner, W.A., Jr. Prostatic calculi: A review. Prostate 1985, 7, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Geramoutsos, I.; Gyftopoulos, K.; Perimenis, P.; Thanou, V.; Liagka, D.; Siamblis, D.; Barbalias, G. Clinical correlation of prostatic lithiasis with chronic pelvic pain syndromes in young adults. Eur. Urol. 2004, 45, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cai, T.; Tessarolo, F.; Caola, I.; Piccoli, F.; Nollo, G.; Caciagli, P.; Mazzoli, S.; Palmieri, A.; Verze, P.; Malossini, G.; et al. Prostate calcifications: A case series supporting the microbial biofilm theory. Investig. Clin. Urol. 2018, 59, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Yang, H.J.; Huang, K.H.; Wang, C.W.; Chang, H.C.; Yang, T.K. Prostate calcification worsen lower urinary tract symptoms in middle-aged men. Urology 2013, 81, 1320–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shoskes, D.A.; Lee, C.T.; Murphy, D.; Kefer, J.; Wood, H.M. Incidence and significance of prostatic stones in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Urology 2007, 70, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kwon, Y.K.; Choe, M.S.; Seo, K.W.; Park, C.H.; Chang, H.S.; Kim, B.H.; Kim, C.I. The effect of intraprostatic chronic inflammation on benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment. Korean J. Urol. 2010, 51, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nesi, G.; Nobili, S.; Cai, T.; Caini, S.; Santi, R. Chronic inflammation in urothelial bladder cancer. Virchows Arch. 2015, 467, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nakai, Y.; Nonomura, N. Inflammation and prostate carcinogenesis. Int. J. Urol. 2013, 20, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fujita, K.; Hayashi, T.; Matsushita, M.; Uemura, M.; Nonomura, N. Obesity, inflammation, and prostate cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Doat, S.; Cénée, S.; Trétarre, B.; Rebillard, X.; Lamy, P.J.; Bringer, J.P.; Iborra, F.; Murez, T.; Sanchez, M.; Menegaux, F. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and prostate cancer risk: Results from the EPICAP study. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Prostatic stroma showing marked focal chronic inflammation with lymphoid follicle formation (A, H&E, ×10, black arrow = lymphoid follicle; white arrow= germinal center; * = prostatic glandular lumina; §= prostatic stroma;). Immunohistochemical staining for anti-CD20 (B, ×10) and anti-CD3 (C, ×10) highlights the B-cell and the T-cell compartments, respectively. Anti-CD21 staining (D, ×10) identifies the follicular dendritic cell meshworks in germinal centers.
Figure 1. Prostatic stroma showing marked focal chronic inflammation with lymphoid follicle formation (A, H&E, ×10, black arrow = lymphoid follicle; white arrow= germinal center; * = prostatic glandular lumina; §= prostatic stroma;). Immunohistochemical staining for anti-CD20 (B, ×10) and anti-CD3 (C, ×10) highlights the B-cell and the T-cell compartments, respectively. Anti-CD21 staining (D, ×10) identifies the follicular dendritic cell meshworks in germinal centers.
Ijms 20 03833 g001
Figure 2. Heavy chronic inflammation with confluent areas surrounding prostatic glands, damaging glandular epithelium and involving glandular lumina. Inflammatory cells are represented by lymphocytes, histiocytes and scattered foreign-body-like giant cells (A, H&E, ×20, black arrow = confluent areas of chronic inflammatory infiltrate mainly consisting of lymphocytes; white arrow = foreign-body-like giant cells; * = prostatic glandular lumina; § = glandular epithelium; ¥ = corpora amylacea within glandular lumina). Immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD45 (B, ×20) and anti-CD68-PGM1 (C, ×20) highlights the lymphocyte and the histiocyte components, respectively.
Figure 2. Heavy chronic inflammation with confluent areas surrounding prostatic glands, damaging glandular epithelium and involving glandular lumina. Inflammatory cells are represented by lymphocytes, histiocytes and scattered foreign-body-like giant cells (A, H&E, ×20, black arrow = confluent areas of chronic inflammatory infiltrate mainly consisting of lymphocytes; white arrow = foreign-body-like giant cells; * = prostatic glandular lumina; § = glandular epithelium; ¥ = corpora amylacea within glandular lumina). Immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD45 (B, ×20) and anti-CD68-PGM1 (C, ×20) highlights the lymphocyte and the histiocyte components, respectively.
Ijms 20 03833 g002
Figure 3. Granulomatous prostatic inflammation (A, H&E, ×10, black arrows = circumscribed granulomatous inflammatory infiltrate; occasional foreign-body-like giant cells within the granuloma, * = prostatic glandular lumina, § = prostatic stroma). Immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD45 (B, ×10) and anti-CD68-PGM1 (C, ×10) labels the lymphocyte and the histiocyte components, respectively.
Figure 3. Granulomatous prostatic inflammation (A, H&E, ×10, black arrows = circumscribed granulomatous inflammatory infiltrate; occasional foreign-body-like giant cells within the granuloma, * = prostatic glandular lumina, § = prostatic stroma). Immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD45 (B, ×10) and anti-CD68-PGM1 (C, ×10) labels the lymphocyte and the histiocyte components, respectively.
Ijms 20 03833 g003
Figure 4. Impact of prostatic inflammation and inflammatory mediators on tumor initiation, growth and progression. NF-kB: Nuclear Factor-kappa B.
Figure 4. Impact of prostatic inflammation and inflammatory mediators on tumor initiation, growth and progression. NF-kB: Nuclear Factor-kappa B.
Ijms 20 03833 g004
Table 1. Circulating and in situ inflammatory factors detected in PCa patients (PCa: Prostate Cancer).
Table 1. Circulating and in situ inflammatory factors detected in PCa patients (PCa: Prostate Cancer).
IL-1Proinflammatory cytokinePromotes cancer growth and progressionVoronov (2003) [58]
IL-6Proinflammatory cytokinePromotes PCa growth and progression; has a role in CRPCNguyen (2014) [59]
IL-8Proinflammatory cytokineProliferation of prostate stromal cells; to regulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and PCa progressionLiu (2009) [63]
IL-17Proinflammatory cytokinePromotes PCa growth, angiogenesis and metastasisSteiner (2003) [60]
IL-30Proinflammatory cytokinePromotes PCa progression and metastasisSorrentino (2018) [22]
MCP-1Chemotactic cytokinePromotes prostatic inflammationFujita (2010) [64]
TNF-αProinflammatory cytokinePromotes PCa progression and metastasisMichalaki (2004) [61]
TGF-βMultifunctional cytokinePromotes PCa progression and metastasisPark (2003) [62]
Abbreviations: Interleukin (IL); Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP); Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF); Transforming Growth Factor (TGF); Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, T.; Santi, R.; Tamanini, I.; Galli, I.C.; Perletti, G.; Bjerklund Johansen, T.E.; Nesi, G. Current Knowledge of the Potential Links between Inflammation and Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3833.

AMA Style

Cai T, Santi R, Tamanini I, Galli IC, Perletti G, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Nesi G. Current Knowledge of the Potential Links between Inflammation and Prostate Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(15):3833.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Tommaso, Raffaella Santi, Irene Tamanini, Ilaria Camilla Galli, Gianpaolo Perletti, Truls E. Bjerklund Johansen, and Gabriella Nesi. 2019. "Current Knowledge of the Potential Links between Inflammation and Prostate Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 15: 3833.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop