Next Article in Journal
EAE of Mice: Enzymatic Cross Site-Specific Hydrolysis of H2B Histone by IgGs against H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 Histones and Myelin Basic Protein
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Two-Dimensional Polar Monolayer SiTe for Water-Splitting via Strain Engineering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules28072972
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication and Properties of the Multifunctional Rapid Wound Healing Panax notoginseng@Ag Electrospun Fiber Membrane

by
Zhaoju Gao
†,
Songlin Liu
†,
Shangfei Li
,
Xinzhe Shao
,
Pingping Zhang
* and
Qingqiang Yao
*
NHC Key Laboratory of Biotechnology Drugs (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Key Lab for Rare & Uncommon Diseases of Shandong Province, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Institute of Materia Medica, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2023, 28(7), 2972; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072972
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 27 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nanochemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Panax notoginseng@Ag core/shell electrospun fiber membrane was prepared by coaxial electrospinning combined with the UV reduction method (254 nm). The prepared Panax notoginseng@Ag core/shell nanofiber membrane has a three-dimensional structure, and its swelling ratio could reach as high as 199.87%. Traditional Chinese medicine Panax notoginseng can reduce inflammation, and the silver nanoparticles have antibacterial effects, which synergistically promote rapid wound healing. The developed Panax notoginseng@Ag core/shell nanofiber membrane can effectively inhibit the growth of the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus. The wound healing experiments in Sprague Dawley mice showed that the wound residual area rate of the Panax notoginseng@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane group was only 1.52% on day 9, and the wound of this group basically healed on day 12, while the wound residual area rate of the gauze treatment group (control group) was 16.3% and 10.80% on day 9 and day 12, respectively. The wound of the Panax notoginseng@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane group healed faster, which contributed to the application of the nanofiber as Chinese medicine rapid wound healing dressings.

1. Introduction

Wound healing is a complex pathophysiological process, with four phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [1,2]. In the inflammatory phase, large amounts of wound exudate are prone to occur at the wound [3,4]. However, excess exudate favors the growth and reproduction of bacteria, which can lead to an intensified inflammatory response, slow down the rate of wound healing, and make wound healing stop in the inflammatory phase [5,6,7]. Therefore, a suitable moist environment to effectively absorb the wound exudate and maintain wound healing has become a research hotspot [8,9,10,11]. Natural polymer chitosan (CS) has good water absorption and biocompatibility, and is widely used in wound dressings [12,13,14,15,16]. The invasion of external environment bacteria into wounds is also an important factor affecting wound healing [17,18]. Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) can play a bacteriostatic role by increasing the permeability of the bacterial membrane [19], interfering with DNA replication [20], and denaturing bacterial proteins [21].
Panax nototoginseng (PN) has been used in wound healing for hundreds of years [22,23,24]. The traditional Chinese medicine PN could reduce inflammation. PN could suppress retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), tumor necrosis factor-2 (TNF-2), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-8 (IL-8), which significantly inhibit the increase in capillary permeability, inflammatory exudation, tissue edema, leukocyte migration and granulation tissue proliferation caused by acute inflammation [25]. Saponins are the effective components of PN and have been widely studied for their good regulatory effects in wound healing. Saponins can promote angiogenesis in the wound by activating Notch/VEGFR-2 or Ang2/Tie2 signaling pathways [26,27]. Studies showed that saponins can inhibit the scar formation of the wound by inhibiting the proliferation of fibroblasts and reducing the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in skin wounds. Currently, the clinical dosage forms of PN in wound healing mainly include PN powder and PN capsules. PN powder is directly applied to the wound and is often fixed with gauze. The high permeability of gauze makes it easy to dehydrate the wound, and gauze can easily adhere to the wound; the wound is painful and bleeding when replacing gauze, which causes mechanical damage, and the number of dressing changes is frequent, time-consuming and laborious; patients find the process painful, and it is easy for bacteria to invade after the gauze is soaked, resulting in a high chance of wound infection. In addition, PN powder has a high local drug concentration when it is externally used, which can stimulate the skin and easily cause a skin allergic reaction. PN capsule oral preparation has the limitation of a fast elimination rate. In addition, patients need frequent administration to maintain an effective blood concentration, resulting in poor patient compliance.
Electrospinning is a strategy that can be used to prepare nanofiber membranes by electrostatic force [28]. Coaxial electrospinning is an electrospinning technique in which the nuclear layer spinning solution and shell spinning solution are placed into the nuclear layer syringe and shell syringe, respectively, and the core/shell nanofibers are prepared by a concentric needle device [29,30,31,32]. The composition, structure, and size of the coaxial electrospinning membrane can be easily adjusted. Traditional Chinese medicine and active substances can be added to the spinning system according to needs, and the self-supporting nanofiber membrane can be constructed by adjusting the spinning condition and process to regulate its structure and size, and it can be applied directly to the wound to promote wound healing. The three-dimensional structure of the coaxial electrospun nanofiber membrane is similar to that of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which is conducive to gas exchange at the wound and the adhesion of fibroblasts, thus accelerating the formation of granulation tissue in the wound [33,34,35,36].
Because of the antibacterial effect of silver, there are many studies on silver nanoparticle-loaded electrospun fibers for wound healing, but there is no study on electrospun fibers that combine antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects to promote wound healing. The use of traditional Chinese medicine to inflammatory conditions is an attractive approach to promote wound healing, and some natural active ingredient-loaded electrospun fiber membranes have been developed. However, electrospun fibers loaded with PN have not been reported. In this study, CS was selected as the water-absorbing active component, silver nitrate as the silver source, and Chinese medicine PN as the medicine. The mixed solution of PN, CS, and polycaprolactone (PCL) was used as the core electrospinning solution, and the mixed solution of silver nitrate and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was used as the shell electrospinning solution for coaxial electrospinning. Combined with UV reduction, Panax notoginseng@Ag (PN@Ag) core/shell nanofiber membranes loaded with the Chinese medicine PN and the active substance Ag NPs were prepared. The addition of CS enhances the hygroscopic property of PN@Ag core/shell electrospun fiber membranes. The CS in the PN@Ag electrospun fiber membrane provides a suitable moist environment for the wound, thus speeding up wound healing to a certain extent. PN reduces inflammation, while the Ag NPs effectively inhibit the growth of bacteria in the wound site, thus synergistically promoting rapid wound healing. Antibacterial experiments showed that the PN@Ag electrospun fiber membrane can effectively inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. In vivo experiments of Sprague Dawley mice indicated that the PN@Ag electrospun fiber membrane group had the best wound healing compared with the gauze treatment group (control group). The constructed PN@Ag core/shell nanofiber membrane provided a new and effective strategy for rapid wound healing.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h Core/Shell Fiber Membrane

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the PN powder and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane. The PN powder had sharp characteristic diffraction peaks at 21.48° and 23.82°, while the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane had a weak diffraction peak at 21.48°, indicating that the crystallinity of the PN powder in the nanofiber decreased, which is beneficial to the sustained release of the PN powder from nanofibers [37]. Figure S1 shows the SEM of PN used for electrospinning. Figure 2a,b are the SEM of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane. It can be seen from Figure 2a,b that the fibers in the prepared nanofiber membrane are continuous and the surface is smooth. PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h and PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h have a similar morphology (Figures S2 and S3). The fibers in the membrane are randomly stacked and constructed into a three-dimensional structure similar to ECM, which provides structural support and a survival microenvironment for tissue cells and speeds up wound healing. The distribution of fiber diameters in the fiber membrane was uniform. The diameter distribution of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h electrospun fiber was measured by Image J software (2.1.0), and the average diameter was 100 ± 15 nm.
Figure 3a–c are TEM images of fiber membranes of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h, PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h, and PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h, respectively. It can be seen from the figures that silver nitrate is reduced to form Ag NPs and dispersed in the electrospun nanofiber. The XPS spectra also indicated the formation of Ag NPs in the electrospun nanofiber membrane (Figure S4). The morphology of Ag NPs has great influence on the bacteriostatic effect of the electrospun nanofiber membrane. The smaller the size of Ag NPs, the better the bacterial inhibition effect of the nanofiber membrane. Furthermore, the more uniform the distribution of Ag NPs in the nanofiber membrane, the better the bacterial inhibition effect of the nanofiber membrane [38,39,40]. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the amount of silver nitrate affects the particle size and distribution form of Ag NPs in the electrospun nanofiber. The particle size of Ag NPs in the electrospun nanofiber was measured by Image J software (2.1.0), and the particle size distribution was statistically analyzed.
The size of Ag NPs in the core/shell electrospun nanofiber membranes of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h, PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h, and PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h was 3.76 ± 0.04 nm (Figure 3d), 3.99 ± 0.18 nm (Figure 3e), and 4.86 ± 0.12 nm (Figure 3f), respectively. In PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h, the Ag NPs smaller than 6 nm accounted for more than 95%, and a few Ag NPs larger than 10 nm were generated, which may have been caused by Ag NPs agglomeration [41]. The Ag NPs size distribution in PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h is uniform (Figure 3e), and all Ag NPs are in the range of 2–6 nm. In PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h, Ag NPs smaller than 6 nm accounted for approximately 60%, and a large proportion of Ag NPs with a large size appeared in the fiber, and some Ag NPs even reached 16 nm (Figure 3d).

2.2. The Swelling Ratio of Prepared Nanofiber Membranes

Electrospun fiber membranes have high porosity and good air permeability, and can efficiently absorb tissue fluid at the wound [42,43,44]. Comparing Table 1 and Table 2, the average swelling ratio of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h fiber membrane is significantly higher than that of the PN@8 wt%Ag-NCS fiber membrane, which shows that the addition of CS enhances the hygroscopic property of electrospun fiber membranes. This is because the molecular structure of CS contains hydrophilic groups such as amino and hydroxyl groups, which enhance the hygroscopic properties of the fiber membrane [45,46]. Studies have shown that the high swelling ratio of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h electrospun fiber membrane could provide a suitable moist environment for the wound, thus speeding up the wound healing [47,48].

2.3. Antibacterial Results of the PN@Ag Electrospun Nanofiber Membrane

The fiber membranes (PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h and PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h) with small particle size and uniform distribution of Ag NPs in fibers were selected to study their antibacterial properties, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. It can be seen from the figure that there is no bacteriostatic zone in the control group PCL@PN (Figure 4a and Figure 5a), indicating that PCL@PN does not have any bacteriostatic effect on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, while PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (Figure 4c and Figure 5c) and PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (Figure 4b and Figure 5b) have more obvious bacteriostatic zones and better antibacterial effects. The diameter of the bacteriostatic zone in the experimental group was measured by Image J software (2.1.0). The diameter of the bacteriostatic zone in the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group was approximately 2.23 cm (Figure 4c), and that in the PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h group was approximately 2.19 cm (Figure 4b), indicating that the inhibitory effect of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h on Escherichia coli was better than that of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h. The diameter of the bacteriostatic zone in the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group was approximately 2.11 cm (Figure 5c), and that in the PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h group was approximately 1.96 cm (Figure 5b), indicating that the inhibitory effect of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h on Staphylococcus aureus was better than that of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h. The inhibitory effect of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was better than that of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h, which could be attributed to the higher Ag NP content and smaller particle size in PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h.

2.4. Cytotoxicity of Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes

The in vitro toxicity of nanofiber membranes was determined by the CCK-8 method. The leachate of five different concentration gradients of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h and blank membranes acted on fibroblasts (L929 cells). Even at higher concentrations (100 μg/mL), PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h and blank membranes showed no toxicity (the cell viability was more than 80%). The results showed that the fiber membrane carrier and drug-loaded PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h were safe and non-toxic, and did not affect the cell viability during the proliferation stage of wound healing (Figure 6).

2.5. In Vivo Wound Healing in Sprague Dawley Mice

The wound condition was photographed on days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 to record the wound healing in Sprague Dawley mice, as shown in Figure 7. On day 3 of treatment, whitening of the wound was observed in the control group and blank membrane treatment group, which indicated that there were symptoms of infection and inflammation in the wound, and the wound inflammation was more serious in the control group (gauze treatment). However, no significant signs of inflammation were seen in the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h treatment group, the PCL@PN treatment group, or the PVP@Ag treatment group.
Wound healing was characterized by the percentage of wound area treated with fiber membranes to the initial wound area (wound aera (%)) (Figure 8). In the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group, the wound area was 52.94% on day 3, 16.07% on day 6, 1.52% on day 9, and 0.46% on day 12. On the day 12, the wound area (%) of the PCL@PN, PVP@Ag, blank membrane and control was 2.24%, 4.07%, 7.69% and 10.80%, respectively. The results showed that the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h electrospun core/shell fiber membrane had a significantly higher wound closure rate than the other four groups and the wound in the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h electrospun core/shell fiber membrane group was smooth. In addition, there was no obvious scab formation in the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group compared with the gauze treatment group (control group). The good rapid healing effect of the wound was attributed to the synergy role of Ag NPs and the gradually released of PN in the prepared nanofiber (Figure S5).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Polycaprolactone (PCL, MW = 8 × 104), polyvinylpyrrolidone K-90 (PVP, MW = 1.3 × 106), chitosan, and ammonium bicarbonate were provided by Dalian Meilun Biological Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Chloroform (CHCl3) was provided by Tianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Panax notoginseng powder was obtained from Yunnan Notoginseng Science and Technology Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Yunnan, China). Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) provided the silver nitrate (AgNO3), ethanol (C2H5OH), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). Escherichia coli was purchased from Beijing Beina Chuanglian Institute of Biotechnology (Beijing, China), and Staphylococcus aureus was provided by Shanghai Bioresource Collection Center (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Preparation of Electrospun Fiber Membranes

In a typical experiment, PCL (0.8 g), CS (0.12 g), and ammonium bicarbonate (0.024 g) were dissolved in CHCl3/DMF (v/v, 8 mL:2 mL). After stirring for 2 h at 25 °C until completely dissolved, 0.08 g of PN powder (accounting for 10 wt% of the PCL mass) was added, and then stirred for 1 h at 25 °C to obtain core spinning solution. PVP (1.5 g) was dissolved in a solution of C2H5OH/DMF (v/v, 7 mL:3 mL). After being dissolved at 25 °C, 0.12 g of AgNO3 (accounting for 8 wt% of the PVP) was added. Then, the shell electrospinning solution was obtained by stirring in the dark. The core and shell electrospinning solution were coaxially electrospun under the following electrospinning conditions: 25 °C temperature, 30% humidity, the positive and negative voltages applied to the syringe tip were 21 and 0.15 kV, respectively, the distance from the tip of the syringe needle to the collector is kept at a constant 18 cm, the flow rate of the core spinning solution was 0.2 mm/min, and the speed of the shell spinning solution was 0.4 mm/min. The wet fiber membrane was obtained by coaxial electrospinning, then the PN@8 wt%Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane was obtained after drying at 50 °C for 3 h. The silver nitrate in the electrospun nanofiber membrane was reduced to Ag NPs after irradiation with 254 nm UV light for 2 h, and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h was obtained. The concentration of the marker of PN (ginsenoside Rg1) in PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h was 1.45‰ (the weight of the ginsenoside Rg1/the weight of the finished nanofiber membrane).
The PCL@PN fiber membrane loaded with PN was obtained by uniaxial electrospinning of the core spinning solution. After the shell spinning solution was uniaxially electrospun and irradiated with 254 nm UV light for 2 h, the PVP@Ag fiber membrane loaded with Ag NPs was obtained. The core spinning solution remained unchanged, and the amount of AgNO3 in the shell spinning solution was changed. 0.09 g AgNO3 (accounting for 6 wt% of the PVP mass) and 0.15 g AgNO3 (accounting for 10 wt% of the PVP mass) were added to the shell spinning solution, and the core/shell fiber membranes PN@6 wt% Ag and PN@10 wt%Ag were obtained under the same electrospinning conditions. PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h and PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h were obtained after 254 nm UV irradiation for 2 h. Under the same conditions (irradiation for 2 h), the PN@8 wt%Ag-NCS core/shell fiber membrane without CS was prepared with the same shell spinning solution and no CS in the core spinning solution. Blank core/shell fiber membranes were prepared under the same conditions without AgNO3 in the shell spinning solution or PN in the core spinning solution. The corresponding name of each prepared sample is shown in Table 3.

3.3. Characterizations

The crystal phase of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane was detected by an X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrometer (Rigaku D/Max 2200PC diffractometer) with a scanning range from 10° to 80°. The morphology and the Ag NPs loading status of the electrospun nanofibrous membranes were uncovered by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JSM-6700F) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-1011). The Image J software (2.1.0) was used to analyze the fiber diameter in the electrospun nanofiber membrane and the size of Ag NPs in the nanofiber membrane. The water absorption of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h was determined by the swelling index [49]. PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h was cut into squares (3 cm × 3 cm), weighed and recorded as M0. The PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h square fiber membrane was placed in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.4) and swelled at 37 °C for 30 min, then one end of the sample was clamped with tweezers for 30 s until there were no more water droplets. The excess liquid on the surface of the fiber membrane was removed with filter paper, and the weight of the fiber membrane was recorded as M1. The experiments were performed on three samples and the swelling ratio was calculated using Equation (1). The swelling ratio of the PN@8 wt%Ag-NCS fiber membrane was tested by the same method for comparison.
Degree   of   swelling = M 1 − M 0 M 0 × 100 %
where M1 is the weight of the fiber film before drying, and M0 is the weight of the fiber film after drying.

3.4. Antibacterial Evaluation Assay

The inhibition effect of the nanofiber membrane on bacteria (Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus) was studied by an antibacterial ring test [49]. First, we mixed the bacteria powder of Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus with sterile water, and then poured it all into a conical flask filled with beef extract peptone liquid culture medium. The conical flask was then placed in a shaker (37 °C, 220 rpm), and the original bacterial solution was obtained after 12 h. Subsequently, the concentration of the bacterial solution was diluted to 1 × 108 CFU/mL with fresh sterilized beef extract peptone liquid medium. The diluted Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus was evenly smeared on culture plates, and then PCL@PN, PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h, and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h fiber membrane discs (1.5 cm × 1.5 cm) were applied in the center of the culture plates and cultured at bacteriological incubator (37 °C, 24 h). The antibacterial evaluation assay of the fiber membrane on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was determined by the diameter of the bacteriostatic zones.

3.5. Cytotoxicity of Electrospun Nanofiber Membrane

Fibroblasts (L929 cells) (Procell Life Science&Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) were cultured in MEM medium at 5% CO2, 37 °C. The cytotoxicity of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h was measured via the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. To summarize, L929 cells digested by trypsin were seeded in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 105cells per well. After incubating cells in the cell incubator for 24 h, MEM medium extract supplemented with two different fiber membranes was used as the experimental group. The mass fraction (the mass fraction of the fiber membrane mass in the MEM medium) of the fiber membrane in the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h experimental group and blank membrane experimental group was set according to the gradient of 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 μg/mL. A well with 100 μL MEM medium was used as the control group. Following incubation 24 h, CCK-8 was added and incubated for another 2 h. The optical density (OD) value at 450 nm was recorded using a microplate reader (Berthold TriStar2S LB 942). The OD value of the control group corresponded to 100% cell activity and the viability was calculated as Equation (2). Each group was used with three wells.
    Cell   Viability   = OD drug   − OD PBS OD control   − OD PBS
where ODdrug was the OD value of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h or blank membrane, ODPBS was the OD value of the PBS solution, and ODcontrol was the OD value of the control group.
The pairwise comparisons for groups were performed using a one-sample t-test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3.6. Establishment of Wounds in Mice and Wound Healing In Vivo

The wound healing experiment was conducted with male Sprague Dawley mice weighing 160–200 g. The animal study protocol was approved by Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (People’s Re-public of China) and the Institutional Review Board of Shandong First Medical University, China. (protocol code W202210280253 and date of approval is 28 October 2022). The mice were anaesthetized with 3% pentobarbital sodium and depilated, and a circular full skin wound model (the diameter of the wound was 10 mm) was constructed in their abdomen with a sterilized punch. To avoid individual differences, the mice were randomly divided into the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h treatment group, PCL@PN treatment group, PVP@Ag treatment group, blank membrane treatment group, and control group (gauze treatment) (n = 3). The fibrous membrane with a diameter of 10 mm was disinfected and placed over the wound. The wound healing was recorded on day 0 (the skin wound model was established) and on day 3, 6, 9, and 12 after fiber membrane treatment. The wound healing was expressed as the percentage of the wound area after membrane treatment to the wound area on the 0th day, and the calculation formula is shown in Equation (3).
Wound   area ( % ) = A A i × 100 %
where Ai is the wound area of the establishment of the skin wound model and A is the wound area after a fixed time.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, PN@Ag core/shell electrospun fiber membranes were prepared by electrospinning technology combined with the UV reduction method. A high swelling ratio (199.87%) of the PN@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane could maintain a moist environment for wound healing. In the PN@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber, the traditional Chinese medicine PN and Ag NPs were co-loaded in the nanofiber membrane. PN could reduce inflammation, and the Ag NPs have antibacterial effects. In vitro experiments showed that the prepared nanofiber membranes can significantly inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The synergistic effect of PN and Ag NPs proved the rapid wound healing role of PN@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membranes. In vivo experiments showed that the wound residual area rate of the PN@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane group was only 1.52% on day 9, and the wound of this group basically healed on day 12, while the wound residual area rate of the gauze treatment group (control group) was 16.3% and 10.80% on day 9 and day 12, respectively. In addition, the PN@Ag electrospun nanofiber membrane has no cytotoxicity, showing a potential application prospect in rapid wound healing. The fabrication of PN@Ag core/shell electrospun nanofiber membranes provides theoretical support for the development of new traditional Chinese medicine rapid wound healing dressings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28072972/s1, Figure S1: The SEM image of the Panax nototoginseng (PN) powder. Figure S2: SEM images of the PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane (a,b). Figure S3: SEM images of the PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane (a,b). Figure S4: XPS survey spectrum of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane. Figure S5: In vitro PN cumulative release curves of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h core/shell electrospun nanofiber membrane.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, and writing—original draft preparation, Z.G. and S.L. (Songlin Liu); original draft, participated in the discussion of the experimental details and the framework of the work, S.L. (Shangfei Li) and X.S.; writing—review and editing, P.Z. and Q.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the academic promotion program of the Shandong First Medical University (2019LJ003 and 2019QL011), the Shandong Province post-doctoral innovation projects (202003084), and the Projects of the Medical and Health Technology Development Program in Shandong Province (202213020257).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (People’s Republic of China) and the Institutional Review Board of Shandong First Medical University, China (protocol code W202210280253 and date of approval 28 October 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Edward C. Mignot, Shandong University, for linguistic advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the Panax notoginseng@Ag electrospun nanofiber membranes are available from the authors.

References

  1. Singer, A.J. Healing Mechanisms in Cutaneous Wounds: Tipping the Balance. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2022, 28, 1151–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, K.W.; Liu, S.Y.; Jia, Y.; Zou, M.L.; Teng, Y.Y.; Chen, Z.H.; Li, Y.; Guo, D.; Wu, J.J.; Yuan, Z.D.; et al. Insight into the Role of DPP-4 in Fibrotic Wound Healing. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 151, 113143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Forss, J.R. Does Exudate Viscosity Affect its Rate of Absorption into Wound Dressings? J. Wound Care 2022, 31, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qian, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Mao, J.; Zhao, B.; Mao, X.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; et al. Secretory Fluid-Aggregated Janus Electrospun Short Fiber Scaffold for Wound Healing. Small 2022, 18, e2200799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Da Silva, L.P.; Reis, R.L.; Correlo, V.M.; Marques, A.P. Hydrogel-Based Strategies to Advance Therapies for Chronic Skin Wounds. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 21, 145–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, M.; Wang, R.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Z.; Lou, X.; Nie, H.; Wang, H.; Mo, X.; Abd-Elhamid, A.I.; et al. Incorporation of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles into Electrospun Membranes Improves Pro-angiogenic Activity and Promotes Diabetic Wound Healing. Biomater. Adv. 2021, 133, 112609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, B.; He, C.; Wang, W.; Ren, Y.; Yang, J.; Guo, S.; Zheng, Y.; Shi, X. Asymmetric Wettable Composite Wound Dressing Prepared by Electrospinning with Bioinspired Micropatterning Enhances Diabetic Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 5383–5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, Y.; He, J.; Guo, B. Functional Hydrogels as Wound Dressing to Enhance Wound Healing. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 12687–12722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, X.; Feng, J.; Feng, W.; Xu, B.; Zhang, K.; Ma, G.; Li, Y.; Yang, M.; Xu, F.J. Glycosaminoglycan-Based Hydrogel Delivery System Regulates the Wound Microenvironment to Rescue Chronic Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 31737–31750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Gao, W.; Li, J.; Pu, Y.; He, B.; Xie, J. A Mg2+/Polydopamine Composite Hydrogel for the Acceleration of Infected Wound Healing. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 15, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, P.; Feng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, C.; Liu, M. Gold@Halloysite Nanotubes-Chitin Composite Hydrogel with Antibacterial and Hemostatic Activity for Wound Healing. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 20, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gruppuso, M.; Turco, G.; Marsich, E.; Porrelli, D. Polymeric Wound Dressings, an Insight into Polysaccharide-based Electrospun Membranes. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Juncos Bombin, A.D.; Dunne, N.J.; McCarthy, H.O. Electrospinning of Natural Polymers for the Production of Nanofibres for Wound Healing Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 114, 110994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, F.; Cui, C.; Sun, S.; Wu, S.; Chen, S.; Ma, J.; Li, C.M. Electrospun ZnO-Loaded Chitosan/PCL Bilayer Membranes with Spatially Designed Structure for Accelerated Wound Healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 282, 119131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Asghari, F.; Rabiei Faradonbeh, D.; Malekshahi, Z.V.; Nekounam, H.; Ghaemi, B.; Yousefpoor, Y.; Ghanbari, H.; Faridi-Majidi, R. Hybrid PCL/Chitosan-PEO Nanofibrous Scaffolds Incorporated with A. euchroma Extract for Skin Tissue Engineering Application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Tang, K.; Liu, J.; Zheng, X.; Wan, G. Injectable Antibacterial Cellulose Nanofiber/Chitosan Aerogel with Rapid Shape Recovery for Noncompressible Hemorrhage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.J.; Wei, S.C.; Chu, H.W.; Jian, H.J.; Anand, A.; Nain, A.; Huang, Y.F.; Chang, H.T.; Huang, C.C.; Lai, J.Y. Poly-quercetin-based NanoVelcro as a Multifunctional Wound Dressing for Effective Treatment of Chronic Wound Infections. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, P.; Huang, L.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Mu, H. Carboxymethyl Chitosan-based Multifunctional Hydrogels Incorporated with Photothermal Therapy against Drug-Resistant Bacterial Wound Infection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, S.; Basumatary, I.B.; Sudhani, H.P.K.; Bajpai, V.K.; Chen, L.; Shukla, S.; Mukherjee, A. Plant Extract Mediated Silver Nanoparticles and Their Applications as Antimicrobials and in Sustainable Food Packaging: A state-of-the-art review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 651–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Komal; Sonia; Kukreti, S.; Kaushik, M. Exploring the Potential of Environment Friendly Silver Nanoparticles for DNA Interaction: Physicochemical Approach. Photochem. Photobiol. 2019, 194, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bruna, T.; Maldonado-Bravo, F.; Jara, P.; Caro, N. Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, L.; Zhang, M.; Gao, L.; He, H. Yunnan Baiyao Diminishes Lipopolysaccharide-induced Inflammation in Osteoclasts. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yao, Q.; Chang, B.T.; Chen, R.; Wei, Y.J.; Gong, Q.J.; Yu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Han, X.; Yang, H.B.; Tang, S.J.; et al. Research Advances in Pharmacology, Safety, and Clinical Applications of Yunnan Baiyao, a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 773185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, L.; Xie, J.; Xin, N.; Wang, Z. Panax notoginseng Saponins Promote Wound Repair of Anterior Cruciate Ligament through Phosphorylation of PI3K, AKT and ERK. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2015, 8, 441–449. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, C.J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L.X.; Kang, S.; Ma, J.B.; Liu, S.A.; Hu, Y.H.; Zhang, F.; Sun, T.S.; Dong, Y.X.; et al. The RIG-I Signal Pathway Mediated Panax notoginseng Saponin Anti-Inflammatory Effect in Ischemia Stroke. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 8878428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, T.; Xie, W.J.; Wang, L.; Jin, X.B.; Meng, X.B.; Sun, G.B.; Sun, X.B. Notoginsenoside R1 Activates the NAMPT-NAD+-SIRT1 Cascade to Promote Postischemic Angiogenesis by Modulating Notch Signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 140, 111693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhong, J.; Lu, W.; Zhang, J.; Huang, M.; Lyu, W.; Ye, G.; Deng, L.; Chen, M.; Yao, N.; Li, Y.; et al. Notoginsenoside R1 Activates the Ang2/Tie2 Pathway to Promote Angiogenesis. Phytomedicine 2020, 78, 153302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kong, B.; Liu, R.; Guo, J.; Lu, L.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, Y. Tailoring micro/nano-fibers for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 328–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Afshar, A.; Gultekinoglu, M.; Edirisinghe, M. Binary Polymer Systems for Biomedical Applications. Int. Mater. Rev. 2022, 13, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.; Guo, M.; Zhu, T.; Xiong, H.; Zhu, L.M. A Careob-like Nanofibers with a Sustained Drug Release Profile for Promoting Skin Wound Repair and Inhibiting Hypertrophic scar. Compos. B. Eng. 2022, 236, 109790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luraghi, A.; Peri, F.; Moroni, L. Electrospinning for Drug Delivery Applications: A review. J. Contr. Release 2021, 334, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zhong, A.; Sun, J. Promotion of Skin Regeneration through Coaxial Electrospun Fibers Loaded with Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2022, 5, 1111–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hao, D.; Swindell, H.S.; Ramasubramanian, L.; Liu, R.; Lam, K.S.; Farmer, D.L.; Wang, A. Extracellular Matrix Mimicking Nanofibrous Scaffolds Modified with Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles for Improved Vascularization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nanditha, C.K.; Kumar, G.S.V. Bioactive Peptides Laden Nano and Micro-Sized Particles Enriched ECM Inspired Dressing for Skin Regeneration in Diabetic Wounds. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 14, 100235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Deshmukh, S.; Kathiresan, M.; Kulandainathan, M.A. A Review on Biopolymer-Derived Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical and Antiviral Applications. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 10, 4424–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Guo, B. Structural and Functional Design of Electrospun Nanofibers for Hemostasis and Wound Healing. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 1027–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cui, S.S.; Sun, X.; Li, K.; Gou, D.X.; Zhou, Y.F.; Hu, J.L.; Liu, Y.C. Polylactide Nanofibers Delivering Doxycycline for Chronic Wound Treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, J.; Cao, R.; Song, W.; Liu, L.; Li, J. One-step Method to Prepare Core-Shell Magnetic Nanocomposite Encapsulating Silver Nanoparticles with Superior Catalytic and Antibacterial Activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 607, 1730–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, J.; Li, H.; Fang, C.; Cheng, Y.; Tan, T.; Han, H. In Situ Synthesis and Properties of Ag NPs/Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Starch Composite Films for Antibacterial Application. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 838–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calabrese, G.; Petralia, S.; Franco, D.; Nocito, G.; Fabbi, C.; Forte, L.; Guglielmino, S.; Squarzoni, S.; Traina, F.; Conoci, S. A New Ag-Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Porous Scaffold: Antibacterial Effect and Cytotoxicity Study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 118, 111394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abduraimova, A.; Molkenova, A.; Duisembekova, A.; Mulikova, T.; Kanayeva, D.; Atabaev, T.S. Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB)-Loaded SiO2-Ag Mesoporous Nanocomposite as an Efficient Antibacterial Agent. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, Y.; Dong, X.; Shafiq, M.; Myles, G.; Radacsi, N.; Mo, X. Recent Advancements on Three-Dimensional Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 959–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, R.; Chen, D.; Gao, N.; Yuan, L.; Hu, W.; Cui, F.; Tian, Y.; Shi, W.; Ma, S.; Zhu, G. Porous Cationic Electrospun Fibers with Sufficient Adsorption Sites for Effective and Continuous 99TcO4− Uptake. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2200618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yin, J.; Xu, L.; Ahmed, A. Batch Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Porous Polylactic Acid-Based Nanofiber Membranes for Antibacterial Wound Dressing. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferreira, P.G.; Ferreira, V.F.; da Silva, F.D.; Freitas, C.S.; Pereira, P.R.; Paschoalin, V.M. Chitosans and Nanochitosans: Recent Advances in Skin Protection, Regeneration, and Repair. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, Y.; Wu, Y. Recent Advances of Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles for Biomedical and Biotechnological Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 203, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, W.; Chen, M.; Duan, D.; Liu, W.; Cui, W.; Li, L. Effectiveness of Moist Dressings in Wound Healing after Surgical Suturing: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Int. Wound J. 2022, 20, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhao, D.; Shi, C.; Guo, T.; Zhang, K.; Cui, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, F.; Chen, J. Multifunctional Gel Films of Marine Polysaccharides Cross-Linked with Poly-Metal Ions for Wound Healing. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, C.; Zhu, Y.; Lun, X.; Sheng, H.; Yan, A. Effects of Wound Dressing Based on the Combination of Silver@curcumin Nanoparticles and Electrospun Chitosan Nanofibers on Wound Healing. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 4328–4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 02972 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of PN powders, and the prepared PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of PN powders, and the prepared PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane.
Molecules 28 02972 g001
Molecules 28 02972 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane (a,b).
Figure 2. SEM images of the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membrane (a,b).
Molecules 28 02972 g002
Molecules 28 02972 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM images of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (a), PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (b), PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h (c), and the particle size of Ag NPs and its distribution in PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (d), PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (e), and PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h (f).
Figure 3. TEM images of PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (a), PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (b), PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h (c), and the particle size of Ag NPs and its distribution in PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (d), PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (e), and PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h (f).
Molecules 28 02972 g003
Molecules 28 02972 g004 550
Figure 4. The inhibition zone of nanofibers (PCL@PN (a), PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (b), and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (c)) on Escherichia coli after 24 h.
Figure 4. The inhibition zone of nanofibers (PCL@PN (a), PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (b), and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (c)) on Escherichia coli after 24 h.
Molecules 28 02972 g004
Molecules 28 02972 g005 550
Figure 5. The inhibition zone of nanofibers (PCL@PN (a), PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (b), and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (c)) on Staphylococcus aureus after 24 h.
Figure 5. The inhibition zone of nanofibers (PCL@PN (a), PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h (b), and PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (c)) on Staphylococcus aureus after 24 h.
Molecules 28 02972 g005
Molecules 28 02972 g006 550
Figure 6. The viabilities of L929 cells after 24 h treatment with the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membranes.
Figure 6. The viabilities of L929 cells after 24 h treatment with the PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h nanofiber membranes.
Molecules 28 02972 g006
Molecules 28 02972 g007 550
Figure 7. The effects of skin wound healing of Sprague Dawley mice in different treatment groups (PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group, PCL@PN group, PVP@Ag group, blank membrane group, and control group) at day 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 after operation.
Figure 7. The effects of skin wound healing of Sprague Dawley mice in different treatment groups (PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group, PCL@PN group, PVP@Ag group, blank membrane group, and control group) at day 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 after operation.
Molecules 28 02972 g007
Molecules 28 02972 g008 550
Figure 8. Wound area (%) of five treatment groups (PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group, PCL@PN group, PVP@Ag group, blank membrane group, and control group) within 12 days. The data given are averages of the three mice in each group.
Figure 8. Wound area (%) of five treatment groups (PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h group, PCL@PN group, PVP@Ag group, blank membrane group, and control group) within 12 days. The data given are averages of the three mice in each group.
Molecules 28 02972 g008
Table
Table 1. Swelling ratios of PN@8 wt%Ag-NCS (control group).
Table 1. Swelling ratios of PN@8 wt%Ag-NCS (control group).
Weight before
Moisture Absorption M0 (g)		Weight After
Moisture Absorption M1 (g)		Difference Value ΔM (g)Swelling Ratio (%)Average Swelling
Ratio (%)
0.0290.0450.01655.1757.74
0.0300.0480.01860.00
0.0310.0490.01858.06
Table
Table 2. Swelling ratios of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (experimental group).
Table 2. Swelling ratios of PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h (experimental group).
Weight before
Moisture Absorption M0 (g)		Weight after
Moisture Absorption M1 (g)		Difference Value ΔM (g)Swelling Ratio (%)Average Swelling
Ratio (%)
0.0290.0870.058200.0199.87
0.0300.0870.057190.0
0.0310.0960.065209.6
Table
Table 3. The corresponding name of each sample.
Table 3. The corresponding name of each sample.
PN in the Electrospun Core Solution (g)AgNO3 in the Electrospun Shell Solution (g)The Mass of CS in the Electrospun Core Solution (g)The Irradiation Time of 254 nm Ultraviolet (h)Sample Name
0.080.120.122PN@8 wt%Ag-2 h
0.0800.120PCL@PN
00.120.122PVP@Ag
0.080.090.122PN@6 wt%Ag-2 h
0.080.150.122PN@10 wt%Ag-2 h
0.080.1202PN@8 wt%Ag-NCS
000.120Blank membrane
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, S.; Shao, X.; Zhang, P.; Yao, Q. Fabrication and Properties of the Multifunctional Rapid Wound Healing Panax notoginseng@Ag Electrospun Fiber Membrane. Molecules 2023, 28, 2972. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072972

AMA Style

Gao Z, Liu S, Li S, Shao X, Zhang P, Yao Q. Fabrication and Properties of the Multifunctional Rapid Wound Healing Panax notoginseng@Ag Electrospun Fiber Membrane. Molecules. 2023; 28(7):2972. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072972

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Zhaoju, Songlin Liu, Shangfei Li, Xinzhe Shao, Pingping Zhang, and Qingqiang Yao. 2023. "Fabrication and Properties of the Multifunctional Rapid Wound Healing Panax notoginseng@Ag Electrospun Fiber Membrane" Molecules 28, no. 7: 2972. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072972

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop