Next Article in Journal
Catalyst-Free Site Selective Hydroxyalkylation of 5-Phenylthiophen-2-amine with α-Trifluoromethyl Ketones through Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution
Next Article in Special Issue
Cyclo- and Polyphosphazenes for Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Green Method of Extracting and Recovering Flavonoids from Acanthopanax senticosus Using Deep Eutectic Solvents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of the Detection Performance of Paper-Based Analytical Devices by Nanomaterials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules27030924
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Aerogels

by
Jingyun Jing
1,
Xiaodong Qian
1,
Yan Si
2,
Guolin Liu
1 and
Congling Shi
1,*
1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Metro Fire and Passenger Transportation Safety, China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China
2
Postdoctoral Research Station of Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhongguancun Smart City Co., Ltd. Substation of Zhongguancun Haidian Yuan Postdoctoral Centre, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(3), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030924
Received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 29 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Review Papers in Materials Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Three-dimensional graphene-based aerogels (3D GAs), combining the intrinsic properties of graphene and 3D porous structure, have attracted increasing research interest in varied fields with potential application. Some related reviews focusing on applications in photoredox catalysis, biomedicine, energy storage, supercapacitor or other single aspect have provided valuable insights into the current status of Gas. However, systematic reviews concentrating on the diverse applications of 3D GAs are still scarce. Herein, we intend to afford a comprehensive summary to the recent progress in the preparation method (template-free and template-directed method) summarized in Preparation Strategies and the application fields (absorbent, anode material, mechanical device, fire-warning material and catalyst) illustrated in Application of 3D GAs with varied morphologies, structures, and properties. Meanwhile, some unsettled issues, existing challenges, and potential opportunities have also been proposed in Future Perspectives to spur further research interest into synthesizing finer 3D GAs and exploring wider and closer practical applications.

1. Introduction

Aerogel, generated by the replacement of liquid inside a gel with gas by freeze-drying or supercritical drying technique, was first presented by S. Kistler in the 1930s [1]. As the lightest solid porous material in the world, it has attracted wide attention owing to its three-dimensional (3D) network structure, high specific surface area, extremely low-density, and thermal conductivity [2,3,4]. The precursor of aerogel can be selected among organic polymers [5], inorganic materials [6], and polymeric hybrid materials [7]. At the beginning, it underwent a long slow-development-stage because of the difficulty in synthesis and the lack of application. However, aerogels with richer types and application fields have been flourishing in the past decade. Such a porous material can be an enticing prospect for its application in the fields of aerospace, chemical engineering, construction, electrical equipment, water purification, and biomedicine [8,9,10,11]. Among them, graphene aerogels [12,13], carbon aerogels [14,15], and carbon nanotube (CNT) aerogels [16] are the most investigated topics, comprising more than 60% of the literature studies, as shown in Figure 1.
As the most important component of two-dimensional (2D) carbon-based material, graphene possesses superior thermal conductivity (~5000 W/m·K), high specific surface area (2630 m2/g), chemical stability, and high electron mobility, as well as excellent mechanical and optical properties, which has great application potential in many fields [17]. However, their direct application as excellent adsorbents, anode materials, and mechanical devices suffers from limitation, as a serious loss in surface area occurs due to the re-stacking problem resulting from π-π interaction between graphene layers and the Van der Waals force [18].
The past several years has witnessed explosive interest in constructing a series of composites based on the versatile platform of graphene. In order to overcome the problem and make full use of the characteristics of graphene sheets, the conversion of 2D sheet to 3D porous aerogel via self-assembling by various methods, including hydrothermal reduction, chemical reduction, crosslinking, and sol-gel processes, is an ideal choice [19]. Due to integration intrinsic properties, including high porosity, conductivity, and feasibility of manufacturing in an industrial scale of graphene and aerogel, 3D GAs have emerged as one of the most exciting and promising materials. The past almost two decades have witnessed a rapid development process in exploring the performance and application of GAs, as reflected in the increasing number of publications collected in the Web of Science database for the search criteria “graphene AND aerogel” (Figure 2).
Although there have been some reviews focusing on synthesis methods, properties, and applications in photoredox catalysis, biomedicine, energy storage, supercapacitor, or other single aspects [17,20] of GA, systematic reviews concentrating on the diverse applications of 3D GAs are relatively scarce. Therefore, it is desired to present a comprehensive review that summarizes the current situation, recent advances, and future prospects in the synthesis and application of 3D GAs to inspire intelligent ideas. This review aims to deliver a comprehensive explanation of the recent advances in the preparation methods and application fields of 3D GAs with varied morphologies, structures, and properties. Meanwhile, some unsettled issues, challenges, and potential opportunities have also been proposed. We hope this review will provide valuable insights into the current status of 3D GAs and be a reliable reference for further research, promoting the practical application of the materials in wide fields.

2. Preparation Strategies

With the further development of 3D GAs, expanded preparation approaches such as hydrothermal reduction [21], chemical reduction [22,23], electrochemical synthesis [24,25], self-assembly [26,27], emulsion technique [28], breath-figure method [29], chemical vapor deposition [30], and ink-printing technique [31] have been adopted to fabricate varied and unique microstructures. Among these, hydrothermal or chemical reduction is the most attractive one based on its low-cost and scalable production. Here, we have classified these methods into two major categories: template-free method and template-directed method.
The interfacial interaction and chemical composition of as-prepared functional GO and/or RGO-based aerogel can be characterized by various means. XPS analysis is performed to characterize both the chemical state and atomic ratio of every element in the GO and the graphene aerogels. For the C 1s XPS spectrum of GA, the peaks attributed to carbon atoms connecting with oxygenated groups, such as C–O and O–C=O, have disappeared as the oxygenated species are substantially removed on the reduction of GO to graphene [32]. It is also evidence for the deoxygenation process and successful preparation of GAs. The significant structural changes are also reflected in the Raman spectra. The G band, which resonates at a lower frequency and an increased D/G intensity ratio compared to that of GO, suggests a reduction of the exfoliated GO. The FT-IR spectra gives the information of various functional groups, proving the change from graphene oxide into a graphite-like structure due to the chemical reduction.
The graphene-based aerogels are mainly prepared from a GO precursor via the reduction process. The dispersion of graphene in substrate is always particularly important for improving the performance of aerogel. In order to avoid aggregation induced by strong a van der Waals force, many preparation methods involving covalent and/or non-covalent modification between GO and polymer matrix and appropriate ultrasonic dispersion are employed [33]. The dispersion of graphene can be reflected on the morphology of aerogel characterized by SEM, SEM-EDS and TEM, and the XRD pattern. Furthermore, it is feasible to study the dispersion state of graphene by characterizing the typical properties of aerogels based on the obvious effect of dispersion on performance.

2.1. Template-Free Approach

A template-free method is preferred in practical application due to the relatively simple synthesis procedures, low cost, and easy scaling up [34]. A series of template-free methods have been put forward for synthesizing 3D GA, in which the most typical and dominant is the self-assembly method. Taking advantage of inherent orderly stacking behavior via π-π interaction of graphene and GO nanosheets under appropriate conditions can produce various 3D structures [35,36,37] without the need and limitation of a template, making it novel and appealing. However, it is still important to develop suitable approaches to achieve the assembly and avoid the precipitation of graphene in a parallel arrangement while declining the repulsion forces of GO solution.

2.1.1. Reduction-Induced Self-Assembly

Amphiphilic GO consists of an abundant aromatic nucleus and oxygen-containing groups [38], in which the oxygen-containing groups decorated on the basal planes and edges are responsible for hydrophilicity and uniform dispersion in water [37,39]. As the reduction process goes on, local phase separation will occur, caused by the removal of hydrophilic groups, which further generates the deformation to prepare for self-assembly. Furthermore, the hydrogen bonding reaction between residual hydrophilic regions of the reduced GO and water causes adsorption of some water drops on the surface, serving as a spacer to prevent parallel aggregation of nanosheets [40].
Chemical reduction is the most widely used method to realize the transformation from GO to graphene. The common reducing agents include ethylenediamine (EDA), hydrazine vapor, Fe (II), sodium hydrogen sulfite (NaHSO3), sodium sulfide (Na2S), and vitamin C and hydrogen iodide (HI) [23,41]. The traditional chemical reduction method to prepare graphene aerogels involves three processes: (i) reduction of graphene oxide aqueous solution, (ii) self-assembly of graphene sheets to form hydrogel, and (iii) lyophilization of hydrogel. Inspired by a mild method to synthesize 3D architectures of graphene [23,42], Yan et al. [43] prepared the magnetic 3D graphene/Fe3O4 aerogel via in situ self-assembly of graphene with NaHSO3 as the reducing agent in the presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The capture of nanoparticles was similar to a fishing process, wherein nanoparticles acted as the fish and graphene/GO nanosheets served as the fishing net that was formed through the self-assembly of GO during reduction. Similarly, Li et al. [44] proposed a simple method, which referred to a one-step reduction by EDA and the self-assembly of graphene oxide, and then freeze-drying to prepare porous graphene aerogel, as shown in Figure 3a. In order to eliminate residual functional groups to obtain ultralight aerogel, Qiu et al. [45], moving one step further, designed a two-stage process. GO was controllably functionalized and assembled into monolithic graphene hydrogel by introducing ethylenediamine. After freeze-drying, the obtained aerogel was subjected to microwave irradiation treatment to eliminate functional groups. Furthermore, Gao et al. [46] developed a novel sol-cryo method to fabricate ultra-flyweight carbon aerogels (Figure 3b). Compared to the traditional approach prepared from hydrogels, they cryodesiccated the aqueous CNTs and giant GO sheets rather than the hydrogels, followed by chemical reduction with hydrazine vapor.
Hydrothermal reduction is another facile and effective strategy to prepare graphene from GO. The reduction degree is determined by reaction temperature and time. Generally speaking, the higher the temperature, the higher the reduction degree. However, there is no consensus on the required time and temperature of the heat-treatment for complete reduction of GO [47,48]. Most of the hydrothermal reduction induced self-assembly of 3D graphene aerogel occurs in the range 80–150 °C [49]. Li and colleagues [50] proposed a facile one-step method to prepare 3D macroscopic SnO2-graphene aerogel (SGA), which involved the synchronous processes of hydrothermal-induced reduction of GO, self-assembly of graphene sheets, and in suit growth of SnO2 nanoparticles, presented in Figure 4. Similarly, Niu et al. [51] reported a universal strategy to incorporate various nanomaterials into 3D aerogel: dispersion of GO and functional components under ultrasonication, followed by heat-treatment at 180 °C and freeze-drying of the hydrogel.
Electrochemical reduction is an appealing strategy used to form 3D GA. Unlike other self-assembly methods that rely on the unique shape of graphene sheets and features of the second components and whose materials are bulky monoliths and unsuitable for electrode modification, electrochemical reduction-induced self-assembly approach is believed to be the most promising means to fabricate a 3D structure applied in electrode material. Chen et al. [24] proposed a method consisting of two consecutive electrochemical steps, namely, electrochemical reduction of GO in aqueous dispersion followed by electrochemical deposition of the second components to form 3D graphene-based composite materials, as shown in Figure 5.

2.1.2. Crosslinking Induced Self-Assembly

The abundant oxygen-containing functional groups on their basal planes and edges make GO sheets sensitive to the experimental conditions, and only assemble into 3D microstructure under certain conditions [52]. The obtained 3D aerogels without reinforcement usually have poor mechanical properties [53]. Therefore, adding cross-linking agents such as polymers [54,55], small organic molecules [56], biomacromolecules [57], and multivalent ions or nanoparticles [58] during synthesis procedures is an effective way to improve their mechanical properties and ordered organization.
Physical cross-linking refers to linking GO sheets and a crosslinker mainly by hydrogen bonding, as illustrated in Figure 6. Qin and co-workers [58] fabricated a reinforced composite graphene aerogel (CGA) by combining surface support through metallic-carbon nanotubes (CNTs) networks and interfacial cross-linking of GO sheets with magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) by a hydrogen-bond. The continuous network structure contributes to mechanical stability and preferred adsorption sites of magnetic NPs. Polymers, such as poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), chitosan (CS), cellulose, and poly(N-iso-propylacrylamide) are also employed to act as a crosslinker. Tao et al. [55] crosslinked the functionalized GO sheets with PVA under hydrothermal conditions to prepare reduced expanded porous graphene macroform (r-EPGM) aerogel, whose pores range from micropores to mesopores to macropores. Similarly, Asfaram and coworkers [59] successfully fabricated a novel 3D magnetic GO composite aerogel depending on the hydrogen bond between the polymer crosslinking agent (PVA) and other components (bacterial cellulose nanofibers, Fe3O4 nanoparticles and GO nano-sheets).
Chemical cross-linking refers to linking GO sheets and a crosslinker by covalent bonding, which has the characteristics of high uniformity and stabilization. Ye et al. [56] developed a facile two-step method consisting of freeze-drying and subsequent curing process to generate inter-crosslinked GO-epoxy composite aerogels (GEAs) with epoxy as a crosslinkable polymer and mainly through covalent bonding interaction (Figure 7). The resulting GEAs exhibit excellent compressive strength, high elasticity, and thermal stability, allowing them to be applied in energy absorption and durable insulation materials.
During the synthesis process, hydrogen bonding and/or covalent bonding between crosslinker and GO sheets accounts for forming the cross-linking sites, which contribute to the generation of hydrogel with a 3D network. Such aerogels usually show significantly improved mechanical properties. However, the introduction of cross-linkers inevitably sacrifices the electrical conductivity of GAs to a certain extent. So, there is a fundamental tradeoff to grasp. Utilizing conductive polymer as a crosslinker to fabricate highly compressible and electrically conductive 3DGAs might be a new attempt.

2.2. Template-Directed Approach

The template-directed strategy, including the emulsion technique, breath figure method, and ink-printing technique, is one of the mainstream approaches employed in the formation of 3D GA with ordered and hierarchical structures [60]. It uses a pre-existing guide (hard or soft template) to directly synthesize the target materials that are difficult to obtain by other tools. Meanwhile, it also inevitably limits the scalability of resulting aerogels owing to the hard accessibility of a well-organized and large-size template itself [46]. The general route for a templated-directed method mainly involves the following steps: (1) template preparation, (2) synthesis of target materials using the template, (3) template removal (if necessary). The obtained aerogels were widely used in lithium-ion batteries and proved to be excellent electrode materials with outstanding performance.

2.2.1. Hard Template

Hard templating strategy, using solid nanoparticles, porous metal foams, and specific movable nozzles as a guide is conceptually the simplest method to synthesize 3D graphene aerogel with the desired microstructure and performance [61]. In general, the pore size is highly determined by the template, and the templates usually need to be removed completely by physical or chemical methods [62]. Huang et al. [63] prepared nano-porous graphene foams by using methyl group modified silica spheres as the hard template. They mixed the silica spheres and GOs in a neutral aqueous to form self-assembly, calcined the obtained composite to reduce GOs into graphene, and etched silicas with HF to produce nanopores. In addition, Guo and coworkers [31] utilized an intelligent 3D ink-printing technique that involves three procedures: ink-printing aqueous of GO and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) with trace calcium ions as the gelator, followed by freeze-drying and reduction under a confined state to fabricate highly stretchable graphene/MWNTs composite aerogel (bCA) with four orders of hierarchical structures (Figure 8).

2.2.2. Soft Template

Compared with the hard template approach, the soft template method with the emulsion droplet, vesicle/micelle, and gas bubble as templates is easier due to the unnecessity of removing the templates [64]. Although it offers less control over the uniformity of the obtained structures, it offers more possibilities in tuning and producing complicated hierarchical structures [65], which has been widely used to prepare 3D graphene porous architectures. Huang et al. [28] employed multiple microemulsions and micelles as a soft template to synthesize 3D porous graphene foams with tunable pore structures. Sun and co-workers [66] proposed a breath-figure method to macro-porous graphene films, by virtue of condensation and close packing driven by the evaporation of the volatile organic solvent of humid air, which promotes the self-assembly of GO platelets. The subsequent drying resulted in a porous film. However, there have been no reports on the fabrication of real graphene aerogels using the soft template method.
The carbon aerogels (CNTs, GO, and graphene) prepared by various methods generally have lower density than the graphene/GO-based hybrid (other nanoparticle or polymers) aerogels. Moreover, for the same GO aerogels obtained by the two-stage preparation procedure involving subsequent microwave irradiation (MWI) or thermal treatment, which further eliminates functional groups after freeze-drying, are ultralight and their density came down to a lower scale compared with those prepared via one-step. However, in any case, all the as-prepared GA possess an interaction network and hierarchical pores ranging from micropores to mesopores and macropores, which can be characterized by SEM and the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm [67]. The porosity is usually higher than 99.6%. The porous structure contributes to a high specific surface area and/or porosity and provides a material transport channel and accessibility to the active surfaces, making them a promising candidate as an adsorbent of organic liquids, anode material, and energy adsorption and storage material. The porous features, surface aera, and density of typical GAs prepared by various methods are summarized in Table 1.

3. Application

Graphene aerogel, with characteristics of low density, high surface area and porosity, and good electrical and thermal conductivity, has attracted the attention of researchers and flourished in the recent decades [68]. They possesses potential application in diverse fields, such as sorption in environmental protection [26,69] electrode materials [70,71], electronic devices [72], flame-retardant and fire-warning materials [73,74], catalysis [75], energy storage [76], and microwave absorption [58]. Based on the adsorption, electrochemistry, mechanical, catalytic, and fire-warning properties of GAs, here we mainly summarize its application fields and classify it into five aspects (absorbent, anode material, mechanical device, fire-warning materia,l and catalyst) sequentially.

3.1. Aerogels for Absorption

Water contamination caused by harmful chemicals, particularly oils and soluble dyes and phosphate, has become an issue of serious global concern. Various technologies including chemical precipitation [77,78], biological treatment [79], membrane filtration [80,81], adsorption [82], and ion exchange [83] have been employed to remove organic contaminants from wastewater. Among them, the adsorption method has been recognized as the most promising candidate. Therefore, the preparation of novel absorbents with low density, water pickup and cost, high absorption capacity, and good recyclability is in urgent need.
Due to the super-hydrophobicity of GA [84], it is commonly considered as a competitive and efficient adsorbent for oil in water, with a higher adsorption capacity compared to other kinds of adsorbents. Li et al. [44] prepared the porous graphene aerogel by one-step reduction and self-assembly of GO. The aerogel is super-hydrophobic with a contact angle of 155° and is an ideal candidate for oil absorption (Figure 9a–c). Taking n-decane adsorption as an example, 8.5 mg of aerogel can completely adsorb 1.4 g of oil within 6 s. The average absorption rate (27 g/g·s) is much faster than that of pure graphene (0.57 g/g·s). The capacity for absorption is up to 120–250 g/g, depending on the liquid densitY.S.milarly, Gao et al. [46] fabricated the ultra-flyweight aerogels by virtue of sol-cryo methodology, which shows excellent absorption capacity of extensive oil liquids (such as n-hexane, crude oil, toluene, motor oil, vegetable oil, ionic liquid, and phenixin) (Figure 9d), falling into the range of 215–913 times their own weight dependent on the oil density, which is 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than traditional adsorbents.
Taking advantage of the abundant oxygen-containing groups and unique pore structure, GO aerogels also exhibit excellent adsorption capacity of water-soluble dye and phosphate pollutants. Tao and co-workers [55] prepared expanded porous graphene macroform (EPGM) aerogel by crosslinking the functionalized GO sheets with PVA under hydrothermal conditions. It has superior adsorption capacity (1050 mg/g) for methylene blue (MB) dye, which is much higher than the typical microporous carbon (AC) (Figure 10d). Asfaram and coworkers [59] successfully fabricated a novel 3D magnetic GO composite aerogel via a gentle filler-loaded networks method. The aerogel is characterized by, e.g., an interconnected porous structure, lightweight (6.8 mg/cm3), high surface area (214.75 m2/g), paramagnetic property (26.59 emu/g), excellent adsorbent efficiency (93%) for cationic malachite green (MG) dye through the Yoshida H-bonding, dipole-dipole H-bonding, π-π interaction, n-π interaction, electrostatic attraction, and physical adsorption, as shown in Figure 10a,c. The result showed that the aerogel preserved a maximum adsorption capacity of 270.27 mg/g for MG. According to previous research, metal oxide with high surface area and affinity for the phosphate, especially iron sulphate (FeSO4), once adhered to the graphene or GO, will show great application potential in capturing phosphates in water, Losic et al. [85] proposed a facile and green method to fabricate two types of 3D graphene aerogels embedded αFeOOH and Fe3O4 nanoparticles, respectively. The prepared aerogels showed superior capacity of 350 mg/g at an initial phosphate concentration of 200 mg/L under acidic conditions and the adsorption process followed the second order model and Freundlich isotherm (Figure 10e).
GAs with unique microstructure act as an ideal guide, providing a new probability to solve the serious water pollution problem faced by traditional adsorbents. The improved adsorption performance, lower-cost, and expanded application in contaminant removal of the GAs is expected to be achieved in the future.

3.2. Aerogels for Anode Material of Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries

Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with high energy density and voltage, which can store and supply electricity, have a wide range of applications with the development of modern electronic devices. Currently, the biggest challenge is to develop durable, nontoxic, and inexpensive materials for electrodes.
Graphene, the single layer of carbon atoms in a hexagonal lattice, is endowed with high stability and unique electronic properties [86], such as conductivity and carrier mobility. Theoretically, transition metal oxide has high theoretical specific capacity, so transition metal oxide/graphene composite aerogels are promising candidates for anode materials of lithium-ion battery and have attracted the most attention of researchers. The monobasic transition metals of Mn3O4 [87], Co3O4 [86], Fe3O4 [88,89], and SnO2 [50] and the binary transition metal of ZnFe2O4 [90], combined with graphene or reduced GO, have been studied for anode materials. Yan et al. [43] prepared a magnetic 3D graphene/Fe3O4 aerogel via in situ self-assembly of graphene in the presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The graphene/Fe3O4 composite aerogel showed a high capacity and cyclic stability (a remaining capacity of 1100 mA h/g after 50 cycles of charge and discharge), meaning it can work well as an anode for LIBs, as shown in Figure 11a,b. The excellent performance is attributed to the efficient interaction between Fe3O4 nanoparticles working as spacer and graphene nanosheets, as both sides can adsorb lithium ions [91]. Similarly, Li and colleagues [50] proposed a facile one-step method to prepare 3D macroscopic SnO2-graphene aerogel (SGA), which displays a well-defined and interconnected network porous microstructure and possesses higher capacity retention and discharge capacity (602 mA h/g after 60 cycles) compared to other SG composites (Figure 11c). Moreover, it can also tolerate varied discharge current densities and maintain a relatively high specific discharge capacity of 590 mA h/g (about 64% of the initial reversible capacity). These research works have created a foundation for wide applications of novel 3D graphene/nanoparticle aerogels in the future.
Owing to the synergetic effect of the super-flexible coating provided by graphene nanosheets and reversible Li+ storage capacity by metal oxide nanoparticles, the composite aerogel has improved performance more suitable for the anode material of LIBs. The high surface area and continuous porous structure of graphene aerogel is attributed to its superior specific capacitance, making it attractive as advanced electrode materials.

3.3. Aerogels with Mechanical Stability for Novel Devices

Two-dimensional graphene/GO with outstanding tensile and compressive strength, high flexibility, and elasticity [92,93] is commonly considered as the most promising building block to fabricate 3D aerogel with mechanical stability. Such an aerogel can be widely employed in flexible electronics, sensors, wearable devices, and smart manufacturing [31]. However, monolithic graphene aerogels formed by random assembly of graphene sheets directly via weak connection often exhibit obvious brittleness in compression as well as stretch [94], and has difficulties meeting the application demands.
There are two main strategies to overcome the brittleness to pursue 3D aerogels with mechanical robustness. The predominant approach is to introduce elastic polymers and small molecules acting as cross-linkers or barriers into the matrix [45,58,95,96], which is less stable in severe chemical or physical conditions [97]. On the basis of graphene aerogel preparation regarding reduction, Qiu et al. [45] designed an integrated functionalization and assembly with the following microwave irradiation treatment process to fabricate ultralight aerogels with high compressibility. It can recover from strain as high as 90% when squeezed into a flake without obvious variation in volume, as shown in Figure 12a. Its properties are beneficial to potential applications in the fields of shock damping and energy absorption. By combining the surface support through metallic-CNTs networks and interfacial cross-linking of GO sheets with NPs, Li et al. [58] fabricated a reinforced composite graphene aerogel (CGA) with excellent structural stability and elastic deformation performance, which show that the stress−strain curves remain unchanged after 200 cycles under the maximum strain of 30% and recover to the origin point at the strain up to 95% (Figure 12b,c).
Another approach is to enhance the interconnection of aerogels to produce a hierarchical structure by adopting freeze-shaping, 3D ink-printing, and other synergistic assembly techniques [98,99]. Guo and coworkers [31] adopted an intelligent 3D ink-printing technique to fabricate highly stretchable graphene/multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) composite aerogel (bCA) with four orders of hierarchical structures, which makes a great contribution to the superior mechanical performance of bCA, including low energy dissipation (0.1, 100% strain), high fatigue resistance (more than 106 cycles), minor plastic deformation (1%), and excellent environment stability (93–773 K), as shown in Figure 13. The ultralight CAs (9.7 mg/cm3), with mechanical stability under dynamic tension and compression deformations, can find potential applications in strain sensors, stretchable components, and lightweight mechanical devices.
Based on the major advances made in the design of flexible 3D graphene aerogels, the trend is to push their structure towards a smarter and more well-controlled system [100], in order to fully understand the nature of property degradation during two-dimensional individual assemblies into bulk 3D structures, and to promote advances in more intelligent design and extensive application in flexible electronic devices, sensors, and complex mechanical structures.

3.4. Aerogels for Fire-Warning Material

The existing commercial fire-warning equipment, including temperature, smoke, and infrared flame detectors, is usually unsatisfactory [101], as they are commonly located at a certain distance from the combustion source and are triggered only when the smoke concentration or temperature reaches a critical value [102]. Consequently, the fire-warning is insensitive, with a response time of more than 100 s [103], which is too late to curb the fire spread and misses the best time for evacuation.
With the increase of temperature, the electrical resistance of GO decreases dramatically, which endows it an attractive application prospect in fire-warning materials [101,104,105]. However, because of its unique porous network structure, aerogel inevitably encounters difficulties in reducing electrical resistance during being burned, which remains a challenge to fabricate sensitive fire-warning aerogels [106,107]. Yuan et al. [73] creatively prepared the GO/ammonium polyphosphate/cellulose nanofiber composite aerogel with a fire-response time of 2.6 s through freeze-drying for the first time. The aerogel exhibits excellent thermal-isolating, flame-retardant, and timely fire-alarm properties. Furthermore, they [74] also fabricated a GO/sodium montmorillonite/cellulose nanofiber multifunctional composite aerogel that triggered a fire alarm in about 1.9 s when met with a fire. Owing to the thermal reduction characteristic of GO, referring that quickly removes oxygen-containing groups, and being reduced to graphene once encountering high temperature or fire, the aerogel possesses abilities of timely detection and early warning in the pre-combustion stage, as illustrated in Figure 14.
The GO modified aerogel with excellent flame retardancy, thermal isolation, and intrinsic fire warning performance broadens its application territory to cover the drawbacks in delayed response and restricted application scenarios of traditional fire detectors. Therefore, the aerogel that can be triggered in the precombustion stage to offer favorable opportunities for firefighting and emergency rescue is endowed with enticing prospects in chemical industries, pipeline transportation, and high-rise buildings.

3.5. Aerogels for Catalysis

A 3D network structure provides multidimensional electron transport pathways and large accessible surface area, which is conducive to improve the separation efficiency of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and the adsorption of reactants. Such intrinsic hierarchical porous structure characteristics and properties make GAs endowed with potential as promising and efficient photocatalysts for practical applications in solar energy conversion [108], such as pollutant elimination [109], water splitting [110], CO2 reduction [111], and chemical reaction progress [112].
The conventional photocatalysts in powder form used in photocatalytic pollutant decomposition has difficulties in meeting the needs of the recycling process [113], as it is essential to immobilize the photocatalyst on solid support. The monolithic 3D GAs is undoubtedly a desirable photocatalyst carrier. Fan et al. [114] prepared a novel 3D AgX/GA (X = Br, Cl) structure, in which the AgX NPs were uniformly distributed on the surface of GA by in situ growth method (Figure 15a). The GAs exhibited high catalytic properties in the oxidative degradation of methyl orange (MO) and the reduction of CrVI, showing that after visible light irradiation for 8 min, the MO was completely degraded by AgBr/GAs compared with the 65% of degradation rate by AgBr (Figure 15b); and the reduction ability of CrVI was 1.5 times higher than that by bare AgBr at the same time interval (Figure 15c).
Generally, CO2 reduction usually undergoes two processes: oxidizing water to generate hydrogen ions (2H2O + 4h+→O2 + 4H+) and reducing CO2 to CH4 via acquiring 8-electrons process (CO2 + 8H+ + 8e–→CH4 + 2H2O) [115]. The 3D GAs have also been proved to be an exciting photocatalyst for the reduction of main greenhouse gas CO2, with higher catalytic efficiency compared to other semiconductors. Tong and co-workers [75] designed a 3D porous g-C3N4/GO aerogel (CNGA) by the hydrothermal induced self-assembly method, in which g-C3N4 acted as the efficient photocatalyst, and GO was responsible for supporting the 3D framework. The as-prepared GAs could reduce CO2 into CO with a high yield of 23 mmol/g (within 6 h), which was about 2.3-fold increment compared to pure g-C3N4 (Figure 16). That is because the photogenerated electrons transfer to the network of GO and react with the CO2 molecules under visible light irradiation. The holes that remained in the valence band of g-C3N4 can react with the surface adsorbed H2O. The separated electron-hole pairs fix the oxidative and reductive reactions mainly on the g-C3N4 and GO surface, leading to highly efficient photocatalytic performance.
The 3D GAs also play an important role in catalyzing some chemical reactions, such as the selective oxidation of alcohol to carbonyl, the reduction of nitroaromatic compound to amino compound, and the synthesis of ammonia [65]. Yang et al. [111] prepared a metal-free 3D graphene-organic aerogel, in which the organic dyes acted as photosensitizers. Such graphene-dye aerogels showed high photocatalytic activity for the hydrogenation of nitro compounds to amines and the reduction of heavy metal ions, which was calculated to be 1.4 and 1.8 times as high as those of other semiconductor-organic dye materials, respectively.

4. Future Perspectives

There is no doubt that considerable advances have been achieved in the fabrication of 3D GA materials in the past few decades. Various preparation methods involving a series of template-free and template-guided methods are proposed to fabricate 3D GAs with integrated properties of graphene and other unique characters. The excellent properties make them attractive and promising in potential applications in varied fields, which brings us closer to practical applications. In this review, we summarized the advancement of literature, historical progress of synthesis of 3D GAs, and introduced the main application in absorption, anode material, mechanical device, fire-warning material, and catalysis aspects.
Currently, although dramatic progress has been realized, the performance and application filed of 3D GAs has not been fully exploited. There are still many challenges toward the preparation and mechanism elaboration of highly efficient 3D GAs. Firstly, most of the 3D GAs are derived from the reduction of GO, so their electrical conductivity and charge carrier mobility are remarkably decreased due to the disruption of p-conjugation compared to pure graphene, which causes the improvement of electrical correlation performance of 3D GAs to often be restricted. Therefore, rational utilization of graphene with superior electrical conductivity to advance the 3D GAs still needs continuous efforts. Secondly, the widely used drying methods of preparation of aerogel are mainly freeze-drying and supercritical drying [116]. Freeze-drying has the principal shortcomings of high energy consumption, prolonged processing time, and microcrystals formation. Supercritical drying gives aerogel a 3D-porous structure with small pores similar to wet gel, which faces limited development due to a complex process and expensive equipment [117]. Therefore, the advent of non-supercritical drying techniques may further expand the aerogels field in a near future. Thirdly, the research of 3D GAs for fire-safety material is still in its elementary stage, and the mechanism and characterization means of fire-warning response need further improvement [105]. Therefore, deeper systematic research on the mechanism from theoretical and experimental aspects is highly desired.
With the output of constant efforts, we believe that substantial breakthroughs for the finer structural control and practical applications of 3D GAs would be expected in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S. and J.J.; data curation, X.Q. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.; writing—review and editing, G.L. and C.S.; supervision, C.S.; funding acquisition, J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2020M670389) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (52074247).

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Kistler, S.S. Coherent expanded aerogels and jellies. Nature 1931, 127, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, M.C.; Zhang, H.M.; Yang, F.L. Hydrophilic and compressible aerogel: A novel draw agent in forward osmosis. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2017, 9, 33948–33955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Antonietti, M.; Fechler, N.; Fellinger, T.-P. Carbon aerogels and monoliths: Control of porosity and nanoarchitecture via sol-gel routes. Chem. Mater. 2013, 26, 196–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pierre, A.C.; Pajonk, G.M. Chemistry of aerogels and their applications. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4243–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ulker, Z.; Erkey, C. An emerging platform for drug delivery: Aerogel based systems. J. Control. Release 2014, 177, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ziegler, C.; Wolf, A.; Liu, W.; Herrmann, A.K.; Gaponik, N.; Eychmuller, A. Modern Inorganic Aerogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 13200–13221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  7. Liu, Z.J.; Ran, Y.Y.; Xi, J.N.; Wang, J. Polymeric hybrid aerogels and their biomedical applications. Soft Matter 2020, 16, 9160–9175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stergar, J.; Maver, U. Review of aerogel-based materials in biomedical applications. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 2016, 77, 738–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Guo, L.; Qi, P.F.; Liu, X.M.; Wei, G. Synthesis of three-dimensional graphene-based hybrid materials for water purification: A review. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Xiong, C.Y.; Li, B.B.; Lin, X.; Liu, H.G.; Xu, Y.J.; Mao, J.J.; Duan, C.; Li, T.H.; Ni, Y.H. The recent progress on three-dimensional porous graphene-based hybrid structure for supercapacitor. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 165, 10–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, Z.Q.; Yao, W.L.; Hu, L.; Liu, D.D.; Wang, C.D.; Lee, C.S. Progress in the preparation and application of three-dimensional graphene-based porous nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 5563–5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  12. Li, G.Y.; Zhang, X.T.; Wang, J.; Fang, J.H. From anisotropic graphene aerogels to electron- and photo-driven phase change composites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17042–17049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, K.W.; Szkopek, T.; Cerruti, M. Tuning the aggregation of graphene oxide dispersions to synthesize elastic, low density graphene aerogels. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 23123–23130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, C.H.J.; Zhao, D.D.; Lee, G.; Liu, J. Strong, machinable carbon aerogels for high performance supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 4976–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lai, F.L.; Miao, Y.-E.; Zuo, L.Z.; Zhang, Y.F.; Liu, T.X. Carbon aerogels derived from bacterial cellulose/polyimide composites as versatile adsorbents and supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Nano. Mat. 2016, 2, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, K.H.; Oh, Y.; Islam, M.F. Mechanical and thermal management characteristics of ultrahigh surface area single-walled carbon nanotube aerogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Korkmaz, S.; Kariper, İ.A. Graphene and graphene oxide based aerogels: Synthesis, characteristics and supercapacitor applications. J. Energy Storage 2020, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, Q.C.; Xiao, M.; Chu, Z.Y.; Li, G.C.; Zhang, Y. Recent progress of toxic gas sensors based on 3D graphene frameworks. Sensors 2021, 21, 3386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Franco, P.; Cardea, S.; Tabernero, A.; De Marco, I. Porous aerogels and adsorption of pollutants from water and air: A review. Molecules 2021, 26, 4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ibarra Torres, C.E.; Serrano Quezada, T.E.; Kharissova, O.V.; Kharisov, B.I.; Gómez de la Fuente, M.I. Carbon-based aerogels and xerogels: Synthesis, properties, oil sorption capacities, and DFT simulations. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, Y.X.; Sheng, K.X.; Li, C.; Shi, G.Q. Self-assembled graphene hydrogel via a one-step hydrothermal process. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, X.T.; Sui, Z.Y.; Xu, B.; Yue, S.F.; Luo, Y.J.; Zhan, W.C.; Liu, B. Mechanically strong and highly conductive graphene aerogel and its use as electrodes for electrochemical power sources. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6494–6497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, W.F.; Yan, L.F. In situ self-assembly of mild chemical reduction graphene for three-dimensional architectures. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3132–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, K.W.; Chen, L.B.; Chen, Y.Q.; Bai, H.; Li, L. Three-dimensional porous graphene-based composite materials: Electrochemical synthesis and application. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20968–20976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sheng, K.X.; Sun, Y.Q.; Li, C.; Yuan, W.J.; Shi, G.Q. Ultrahigh-rate supercapacitors based on eletrochemically reduced graphene oxide for ac line-filtering. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cong, H.P.; Ren, X.C.; Wang, P.; Yu, S.H. Macroscopic multifunctional graphene-based hydrogels and aerogels by a metal ion induced self-assembly process. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2693–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. He, Y.L.; Li, J.H.; Li, L.F.; Chen, J.B.; Li, J.Y. The synergy reduction and self-assembly of graphene oxide via gamma-ray irradiation in an ethanediamine aqueous solution. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2016, 27, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, X.D.; Sun, B.; Su, D.W.; Zhao, D.Y.; Wang, G.X. Soft-template synthesis of 3D porous graphene foams with tunable architectures for lithium-O2 batteries and oil adsorption applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7973–7979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.W.; Hwang, J.O.; Lee, W.J.; Kwon, J.; Bielawski, C.W.; Ruoff, R.S.; Kim, S.O. Three-dimensional self-assembly of graphene oxide platelets into mechanically flexible macroporous carbon films. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 10084–10088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Z.P.; Ren, W.C.; Gao, L.B.; Liu, B.L.; Pei, S.F.; Cheng, H.M. Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, F.; Jiang, Y.Q.; Xu, Z.; Xiao, Y.H.; Fang, B.; Liu, Y.J.; Gao, W.W.; Zhao, P.; Wang, H.T.; Gao, C. Highly stretchable carbon aerogels. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gong, Y.; Yu, Y.C.; Kang, H.X.; Chen, X.H.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.M.; Song, H.H. Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide/chitosan composite aerogels with high mechanical performance. Polymers 2019, 11, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Zhuo, B.; Cao, S.A.; Li, X.P.; Liang, J.H.; Bei, Z.H.; Yang, Y.T.; Yuan, Q.P. A nanofibrillated cellulose-based electrothermal aerogel constructed with carbon nanotubes and graphene. Molecules 2020, 25, 3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weng, W.S.; Lin, J.; Du, Y.C.; Ge, X.F.; Zhou, X.S.; Bao, J.C. Template-free synthesis of metal oxide hollow micro-/nanospheres via Ostwald ripening for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 10168–10175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, J.; Cote, L.J.; Kim, F.; Yuan, W.; Shull, K.R.; Huang, J. Graphene oxide sheets at interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8180–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, C.; Shi, G.Q. Three-dimensional graphene architectures. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5549–5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Luo, J.; Cote, L.J.; Tung, V.C.; Tan, A.T.; Goins, P.E.; Wu, J.; Huang, J. Graphene oxide nanocolloids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17667–17669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Boukhvalov, D.W.; Katsnelson, M.I. Modeling of graphite oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10697–10701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  39. Erickson, K.; Erni, R.; Lee, Z.; Alem, N.; Gannett, W.; Zettl, A. Determination of the local chemical structure of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4467–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Qin, S.Y.; Liu, X.J.; Zhuo, R.X.; Zhang, X.Z. Microstructure-controllable graphene oxide hydrogel film based on a pH-responsive graphene oxide hydrogel. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012, 213, 2044–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, W.F.; Yan, L.F.; Bangal, P.R. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide to graphene by sulfur-containing compounds. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 19885–19890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, X.J.; Zhu, Y.W.; Murali, S.; Stoller, M.D.; Ruoff, R.S. Nanostructured reduced graphene oxide/Fe2O3 composite as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3333–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, W.F.; Li, S.R.; Chen, C.H.; Yan, L.F. Self-assembly and embedding of nanoparticles by in situ reduced graphene for preparation of a 3D graphene/nanoparticle aerogel. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 5679–5683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, J.H.; Li, J.Y.; Meng, H.; Xie, S.Y.; Zhang, B.W.; Li, L.F.; Ma, H.J.; Zhang, J.Y.; Yu, M. Ultra-light, compressible and fire-resistant graphene aerogel as a highly efficient and recyclable absorbent for organic liquids. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, H.; Zhao, Z.B.; Wan, W.B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Qiu, J.S. Ultralight and highly compressible graphene aerogels. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2219–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, H.Y.; Xu, Z.; Gao, C. Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2554–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Acik, M.; Lee, G.; Mattevi, C.; Chhowalla, M.; Cho, K.; Chabal, Y.J. Unusual infrared-absorption mechanism in thermally reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 840–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Akhavan, O. The effect of heat treatment on formation of graphene thin films from graphene oxide nanosheets. Carbon 2010, 48, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kar, T.; Devivaraprasad, R.; Singh, R.K.; Bera, B.; Neergat, M. Reduction of graphene oxide-a comprehensive electrochemical investigation in alkaline and acidic electrolytes. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 57781–57790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liang, J.F.; Liu, Y.K.; Guo, L.; Li, L.D. Facile one-step synthesis of a 3D macroscopic SnO2-graphene aerogel and its application as a superior anode material for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11489–11492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niu, Z.Q.; Liu, L.L.; Zhang, L.; Shao, Q.; Zhou, W.Y.; Chen, X.D.; Xie, S.S. A universal strategy to prepare functional porous graphene hybrid architectures. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3681–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Whitby, R.L. Chemical control of graphene architecture: Tailoring shape and properties. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 9733–9754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shi, Q.R.; Cha, Y.; Song, Y.; Lee, J.I.; Zhu, C.Z.; Li, X.Y.; Song, M.K.; Du, D.; Lin, Y.H. 3D graphene-based hybrid materials: Synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 15414–15447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gao, H.C.; Sun, Y.M.; Zhou, J.J.; Xu, R.; Duan, H.W. Mussel-inspired synthesis of polydopamine-functionalized graphene hydrogel as reusable adsorbents for water purification. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2013, 5, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tao, Y.; Kong, D.B.; Zhang, C.; Lv, W.; Wang, M.X.; Li, B.H.; Huang, Z.H.; Kang, F.Y.; Yang, Q.H. Monolithic carbons with spheroidal and hierarchical pores produced by the linkage of functionalized graphene sheets. Carbon 2014, 69, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ye, S.B.; Feng, J.C.; Wu, P.Y. Highly elastic graphene oxide-epoxy composite aerogels via simple freeze-drying and subsequent routine curing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 3495–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, Y.X.; Wu, Q.; Sun, Y.Q.; Bai, H.; Shi, G.Q. Three-dimensional self-assembly of graphene oxide and DNA into multifunctional hydrogels. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7358–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Qin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, N.; Wang, Q.Z.; Zhang, X.J.; Li, Y. Preparation of graphene aerogel with high mechanical stability and microwave absorption ability via combining surface support of metallic-CNTs and interfacial cross-linking by magnetic nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 10409–10417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Arabkhani, P.; Asfaram, A. Development of a novel three-dimensional magnetic polymer aerogel as an efficient adsorbent for malachite green removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, Y.D.; Goebl, J.; Yin, Y.D. Templated synthesis of nanostructured materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2610–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Choi, B.G.; Yang, M.; Hong, W.H.; Choi, J.W.; Huh, Y.S. 3D macroporous graphene frameworks for supercapacitors with high energy and power densities. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 4020–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, X.J.; Feng, J.; Bai, Y.C.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Y.D. Synthesis, properties, and applications of hollow micro-/nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10983–11060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, X.D.; Qian, K.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Yu, C.Z.; Zhao, D.Y. Functional nanoporous graphene foams with controlled pore sizes. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 4419–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Meng, Y.; Gu, D.; Zhang, F.Q.; Shi, Y.F.; Yang, H.F.; Li, Z.; Yu, C.Z.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D.Y. Ordered mesoporous polymers and homologous carbon frameworks: Amphiphilic surfactant templating and direct transformation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005, 44, 7053–7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lu, K.Q.; Xin, X.; Zhang, N.; Tang, Z.R.; Xu, Y.J. Photoredox catalysis over graphene aerogel-supported composites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 4590–4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yin, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Kong, J.H.; Zou, C.J.; Li, C.M.; Lu, X.H.; Ma, J.; Boey, F.Y.; Chen, X.D. Assembly of graphene sheets into hierarchical structures for high-performance energy storage. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3831–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hou, X.F.; Zheng, Y.H.; Ma, X.L.; Liu, Y.H.; Ma, Z.C. The effects of hydrophobicity and textural properties on hexamethyldisiloxane adsorption in reduced graphene oxide aerogels. Molecules 2021, 26, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sui, Z.Y.; Meng, Y.N.; Xiao, P.W.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Wei, Z.X.; Han, B.H. Nitrogen-doped graphene aerogels as efficient supercapacitor electrodes and gas adsorbents. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2015, 7, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hu, H.; Zhao, Z.B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Qiu, J.S. Compressible carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid aerogels with superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity for oil sorption. Environ. Sci. Tech. Let. 2014, 1, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, J.; Fang, F.; Yuan, T.; Yang, J.H.; Chen, L.; Yao, C.; Zheng, S.Y.; Sun, D.L. Three-dimensional graphene/single-walled carbon nanotube aerogel anchored with SnO2 nanoparticles for high performance lithium storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2017, 9, 3544–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, Z.S.; Yang, S.B.; Sun, Y.; Parvez, K.; Feng, X.L.; Mullen, K. 3D nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel-supported Fe3O4 nanoparticles as efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9082–9085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hu, Y.J.; Zhuo, H.; Chen, Z.H.; Wu, K.Z.; Luo, Q.S.; Liu, Q.Z.; Jing, S.S.; Liu, C.F.; Zhong, L.X.; Sun, R.C.; et al. Superelastic carbon aerogel with ultrahigh and wide-range linear sensitivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2018, 10, 40641–40650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cao, C.R.; Yuan, B.H. Thermally induced fire early warning aerogel with efficient thermal isolation and flame-retardant properties. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2021, 32, 2159–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zuo, B.Y.; Yuan, B.H. Flame-retardant cellulose nanofiber aerogel modified with graphene oxide and sodium montmorillonite and its fire-alarm application. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2021, 32, 1877–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tong, Z.W.; Yang, D.; Shi, J.F.; Nan, Y.H.; Sun, Y.Y.; Jiang, Z.Y. Three-dimensional porous aerogel constructed by g-C3N4 and graphene oxide nanosheets with excellent visible-light photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2015, 7, 25693–25701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ren, L.; Hui, K.N.; Hui, K.S.; Liu, Y.D.; Qi, X.; Zhong, J.X.; Du, Y.; Yang, J.P. Corrigendum: 3D hierarchical porous graphene aerogel with tunable meso-pores on graphene nanosheets for high-performance energy storage. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 17243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  77. Chen, Q.Y.; Luo, Z.; Hills, C.; Xue, G.; Tyrer, M. Precipitation of heavy metals from wastewater using simulated flue gas: Sequent additions of fly ash, lime and carbon dioxide. Water. Res. 2009, 43, 2605–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, Q.Y.; Yao, Y.; Li, X.Y.; Lu, J.; Zhou, J.; Huang, Z.L. Comparison of heavy metal removals from aqueous solutions by chemical precipitation and characteristics of precipitates. J. Water Process Eng. 2018, 26, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tsai, W.T.; Chen, H.R. Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution using low-cost chlorella-based biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 844–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Doke, S.M.; Yadav, G.D. Novelties of combustion synthesized titania ultrafiltration membrane in efficient removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous effluent. Chemosphere 2014, 117, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Leo, C.P.; Chai, W.K.; Mohammad, A.W.; Qi, Y.; Hoedley, A.F.; Chai, S.P. Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes. Water. Sci. Technol. 2011, 64, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Akhurst, D.J.; Jones, G.B.; Clark, M.; McConchie, D. Phosphate removal from aqueous solutions using neutralised bauxite refinery residues (Bauxsol™). Environ. Chem. 2006, 3, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Terry, T.A. Removal of nitrates and phosphates by ion exchange with hydrotalcite. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2009, 26, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nguyen, D.D.; Tai, N.H.; Lee, S.B.; Kuo, W.S. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic properties of graphene-based sponges fabricated using a facile dip coating method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7908–7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tran, D.N.H.; Kabiri, S.; Wang, L.; Losic, D. Engineered graphene-nanoparticle aerogel composites for efficient removal of phosphate from water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6844–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gomez-Navarro, C.; Weitz, R.T.; Bittner, A.M.; Scolari, M.; Mews, A.; Burghard, M.; Kern, K. Electronic transport properties of individual chemically reduced graphene oxide sheets. Nano. Lett. 2007, 7, 3499–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, H.L.; Cui, L.F.; Yang, Y.; Sanchez Casalongue, H.; Robinson, J.T.; Liang, Y.Y.; Cui, Y.; Dai, H.J. Mn3O4-graphene hybrid as a high-capacity anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13978–13980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  88. Zhou, G.M.; Wang, D.W.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.L.; Li, N.; Wu, Z.S.; Wen, L.; Lu, G.Q.; Cheng, H.M. Graphene-wrapped Fe3O4 anode material with improved reversible capacity and cyclic stability for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5306–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ji, L.W.; Tan, Z.K.; Kuykendall, T.R.; Aloni, S.; Xun, S.D.; Lin, E.; Battaglia, V.; Zhang, Y.G. Fe3O4 nanoparticle-integrated graphene sheets for high-performance half and full lithium ion cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 7170–7177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Askari, M.B.; Salarizadeh, P.; Seifi, M.; Ramezan zadeh, M.H.; Di Bartolomeo, A. ZnFe2O4 nanorods on reduced graphene oxide as advanced supercapacitor electrodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 860, 158497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, M.; Lei, D.N.; Yin, X.M.; Chen, L.B.; Li, Q.H.; Wang, Y.G.; Wang, T.H. Magnetite/graphene composites: Microwave irradiation synthesis and enhanced cycling and rate performances for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dikin, D.A.; Stankovich, S.; Zimney, E.J.; Piner, R.D.; Dommett, G.H.; Evmenenko, G.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 2007, 448, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kim, K.H.; Oh, Y.; Islam, M.F. Graphene coating makes carbon nanotube aerogels superelastic and resistant to fatigue. Nat. Nano-Technol. 2012, 7, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Qiu, L.; Liu, J.Z.; Chang, S.L.; Wu, Y.Z.; Li, D. Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  95. Yilmaz, G.; Lu, X.M.; Ho, G.W. Cross-linker mediated formation of sulfur-functionalized V2O5/graphene aerogels and their enhanced pseudocapacitive performance. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lee, B.; Lee, S.; Lee, M.; Jeong, D.H.; Baek, Y.; Yoon, J.; Kim, Y.H. Carbon nanotube-bonded graphene hybrid aerogels and their application to water purification. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 6782–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Tang, Y.; Gong, S.; Chen, Y.; Yap, L.W.; Cheng, W.L. Manufacturable conducting rubber ambers and stretchable conductors from copper nanowire aerogel monoliths. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5707–5714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Si, Y.; Yu, J.Y.; Tang, X.M.; Ge, J.L.; Ding, B. Ultralight nanofibre-assembled cellular aerogels with superelasticity and multifunctionality. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  99. Qi, H.S.; Mäder, E.; Liu, J.W. Electrically conductive aerogels composed of cellulose and carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 9714–9720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fratzl, P.; Weinkamer, R. Nature’s hierarchical materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2007, 52, 1263–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  101. Xie, H.L.; Lai, X.J.; Li, H.Q.; Gao, J.F.; Zeng, X.R.; Huang, X.Y.; Lin, X.Y. A highly efficient flame retardant nacre-inspired nanocoating with ultrasensitive fire-warning and self-healing capabilities. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Evans, D.D.; Stroup, D.W. Methods to calculate the response time of heat and smoke detectors installed below large unobstructed ceilings. Fire Technol. 1986, 22, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Qualey Iii, J.R. Fire test comparisons of smoke detector response times. Fire Technol. 2000, 36, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Xie, H.L.; Lai, X.J.; Li, H.Q.; Gao, J.F.; Zeng, X.R.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhang, S.F. A sandwich-like flame retardant nanocoating for supersensitive fire-warning. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, J.Y.; Xie, H.L.; Lai, X.J.; Li, H.Q.; Gao, J.F.; Zeng, X.R. An ultrasensitive fire-warning chitosan/montmorillonite/carbon nanotube composite aerogel with high fire-resistance. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chen, Z.H.; Hu, Y.J.; Zhuo, H.; Liu, L.X.; Jing, S.S.; Zhong, L.X.; Peng, X.W.; Sun, R.C. Compressible, elastic, and pressure-sensitive carbon aerogels derived from 2D titanium carbide nanosheets and bacterial cellulose for wearable sensors. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 3301–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pang, Y.; Zhang, K.N.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Ju, Z.Y.; Li, Y.X.; Wang, X.F.; Wang, D.Y.; Jian, M.Q.; Zhang, Y.Y.; et al. Epidermis microstructure inspired graphene pressure sensor with random distributed spinosum for high sensitivity and large linearity. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2346–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhang, N.; Yang, M.Q.; Liu, S.Q.; Sun, Y.G.; Xu, Y.J. Waltzing with the versatile platform of graphene to synthesize composite photocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10307–10377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wan, W.C.; Yu, S.; Dong, F.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Y. Efficient C3N4/graphene oxide macroscopic aerogel visible-light photocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 7823–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Park, J.; Jin, T.; Liu, C.; Li, G.H.; Yan, M.D. Three-dimensional graphene-TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalyst synthesized by covalent attachment. ACS Omega 2016, 1, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, M.Q.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.J. Metal-free, robust, and regenerable 3D graphene-organics aerogel with high and stable photosensitization efficiency. J. Catal. 2017, 346, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gao, M.M.; Peh, C.K.N.; Ong, W.L.; Ho, G.W. Green chemistry synthesis of a nanocomposite graphene hydrogel with three-dimensional nano-mesopores for photocatalytic H2 production. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 13169–13177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wan, W.C.; Lin, Y.H.; Prakash, A.; Zhou, Y. Three-dimensional carbon-based architectures for oil remediation: From synthesis and modification to functionalization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 18687–18705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fan, Y.Y.; Ma, W.G.; Han, D.X.; Gan, S.Y.; Dong, X.D.; Niu, L. Convenient recycling of 3D AgX/graphene aerogels (X = Br, Cl) for efficient photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3767–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zhou, H.; Li, P.; Guo, J.J.; Yan, R.Y.; Fan, T.X.; Zhang, D.; Ye, J.H. Artificial photosynthesis on tree trunk derived alkaline tantalates with hierarchical anatomy: Towards CO2 photo-fixation into CO and CH4. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Sosnik, A.; Kalmar, J.; De Marco, I.; Erkey, C.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Aerogels in drug delivery: From design to application. J. Control. Release 2021, 332, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zaman, A.; Huang, F.; Jiang, M.; Wei, W.; Zhou, Z.W. Preparation, properties, and applications of natural cellulosic aerogels: A review. Energy. Built. Environ. 2020, 1, 60–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 00924 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of aerogels based on chemical component. Data are summarized on the Web of Science from 2010 to May 2020.
Figure 1. Percentage of aerogels based on chemical component. Data are summarized on the Web of Science from 2010 to May 2020.
Molecules 27 00924 g001
Molecules 27 00924 g002 550
Figure 2. Number of publications about GAs in the past almost two decades. Data are summarized on the Web of Science.
Figure 2. Number of publications about GAs in the past almost two decades. Data are summarized on the Web of Science.
Molecules 27 00924 g002
Molecules 27 00924 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Images of the fabrication process of the graphene aerogel using the traditional method, where the GO is reacted with EDA for 24 h at 80 °C and then freeze-dried. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Images of the fabrication process of the graphene aerogel using the sol-cryo method. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 3. (a) Images of the fabrication process of the graphene aerogel using the traditional method, where the GO is reacted with EDA for 24 h at 80 °C and then freeze-dried. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Images of the fabrication process of the graphene aerogel using the sol-cryo method. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH.
Molecules 27 00924 g003
Molecules 27 00924 g004 550
Figure 4. A schematic illustration of the synthesis of the SGA. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 4. A schematic illustration of the synthesis of the SGA. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 00924 g004
Molecules 27 00924 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the preparation method for ERGO-based composite materials. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2012, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the preparation method for ERGO-based composite materials. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2012, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 00924 g005
Molecules 27 00924 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic diagram for the preparation procedure and mechanism of CGA; (a) GO flakes; (b) metallic-CNT on GO flakes; (c) Fe3O4 NPs on the edge of GO flakes; (d) Fe3O4 NPs attracted with each other; (e) Fe3O4 NPs enhanced the interlaminar connectivity of flakes; (f) the redundant NPs on the pore of CGA. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. Schematic showing the procedure for the preparation of r-EPGM. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram for the preparation procedure and mechanism of CGA; (a) GO flakes; (b) metallic-CNT on GO flakes; (c) Fe3O4 NPs on the edge of GO flakes; (d) Fe3O4 NPs attracted with each other; (e) Fe3O4 NPs enhanced the interlaminar connectivity of flakes; (f) the redundant NPs on the pore of CGA. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. Schematic showing the procedure for the preparation of r-EPGM. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier Ltd.
Molecules 27 00924 g006
Molecules 27 00924 g007 550
Figure 7. (a,b) Refer to the scheme of the preparation and formation mechanism of GEAs, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 7. (a,b) Refer to the scheme of the preparation and formation mechanism of GEAs, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 00924 g007
Molecules 27 00924 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis procedures of the nanoporous graphene foams. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH. (b) Schematic illustration of the hierarchical synergistic assembly for fabrication of stretchable bCAs through 3D printing (I) followed by freeze-drying (II) and pre-buckled reduction (III). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31].
Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis procedures of the nanoporous graphene foams. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH. (b) Schematic illustration of the hierarchical synergistic assembly for fabrication of stretchable bCAs through 3D printing (I) followed by freeze-drying (II) and pre-buckled reduction (III). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31].
Molecules 27 00924 g008
Molecules 27 00924 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of the (a) surface, (b,c) cross-section of the graphene aerogel showing the porous network structure. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) Absorption process of toluene (stained with Sudan Black B) on water by the aerogel within 5 s. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 9. SEM images of the (a) surface, (b,c) cross-section of the graphene aerogel showing the porous network structure. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) Absorption process of toluene (stained with Sudan Black B) on water by the aerogel within 5 s. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH.
Molecules 27 00924 g009
Molecules 27 00924 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Schematic illustration of the possible interaction between aerogel and MG dye; (b,c) images of adsorption properties and magnetic separation of aerogel before and after the MG dye adsorption process. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [59]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier B.V. (d) Adsorption isotherms of r-EPGM, EPGM and AC toward MB at 303 K and pH = 11.5. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier Ltd. (e) The effect of time on the amount of phosphate adsorbed on the GN-αFeOOH and GN-Fe3O4 aerogels. Conditions: phosphate concentration = 20 mg/L; pH = 6.0. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [85]. Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 10. (a) Schematic illustration of the possible interaction between aerogel and MG dye; (b,c) images of adsorption properties and magnetic separation of aerogel before and after the MG dye adsorption process. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [59]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier B.V. (d) Adsorption isotherms of r-EPGM, EPGM and AC toward MB at 303 K and pH = 11.5. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier Ltd. (e) The effect of time on the amount of phosphate adsorbed on the GN-αFeOOH and GN-Fe3O4 aerogels. Conditions: phosphate concentration = 20 mg/L; pH = 6.0. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [85]. Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 00924 g010
Molecules 27 00924 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) The proposed self-assembly and wrapping mechanism for 3D graphene/nanoparticles architecture formation during the chemical reduction of GO in aqueous suspension in the presence of nanoparticles. (b) Electrochemical characterizations of a half-cell composed of graphene/Fe3O4 and Li: discharge/charge profiles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2011, Wiley-VCH. (c) Rate performance of the SGA. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 11. (a) The proposed self-assembly and wrapping mechanism for 3D graphene/nanoparticles architecture formation during the chemical reduction of GO in aqueous suspension in the presence of nanoparticles. (b) Electrochemical characterizations of a half-cell composed of graphene/Fe3O4 and Li: discharge/charge profiles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2011, Wiley-VCH. (c) Rate performance of the SGA. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 00924 g011
Molecules 27 00924 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Digital photographs showing the compressibility of aerogels. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH. (b) Stress–strain curve of CGA at the maximum strain of 30% for 1–200 cycles; (c) stress–strain curve of CGA at different maximum strains of 30, 65, 80, and 95% respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 12. (a) Digital photographs showing the compressibility of aerogels. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2013, Wiley-VCH. (b) Stress–strain curve of CGA at the maximum strain of 30% for 1–200 cycles; (c) stress–strain curve of CGA at different maximum strains of 30, 65, 80, and 95% respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 27 00924 g012
Molecules 27 00924 g013 550
Figure 13. Mechanical stability of bCAs. Storage modulus (red), loss modulus (blue), and damping ratio (yellow) as a function of temperature (a) and frequency (b) of bCAs with 30 wt% MWNTs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31].
Figure 13. Mechanical stability of bCAs. Storage modulus (red), loss modulus (blue), and damping ratio (yellow) as a function of temperature (a) and frequency (b) of bCAs with 30 wt% MWNTs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31].
Molecules 27 00924 g013
Molecules 27 00924 g014 550
Figure 14. Experimental circuit and fire-warning mechanism diagram. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. Copyright 2021, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figure 14. Experimental circuit and fire-warning mechanism diagram. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. Copyright 2021, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Molecules 27 00924 g014
Molecules 27 00924 g015 550
Figure 15. (a) SEM image of the AgBr/GAs. (b,c) The photocatalytic oxidative curves of MO and reductive curves of CrVI by AgBr/GAs and AgBr under visible light and the absorptive curve of AgBr/GAs in the dark, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [114]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier Inc.
Figure 15. (a) SEM image of the AgBr/GAs. (b,c) The photocatalytic oxidative curves of MO and reductive curves of CrVI by AgBr/GAs and AgBr under visible light and the absorptive curve of AgBr/GAs in the dark, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [114]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier Inc.
Molecules 27 00924 g015
Molecules 27 00924 g016 550
Figure 16. Schematic diagram for illustrating the photodegradation (I) and photoreduction (II) processes over CNGA under visible light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Figure 16. Schematic diagram for illustrating the photodegradation (I) and photoreduction (II) processes over CNGA under visible light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Molecules 27 00924 g016
Table
Table 1. Porous features, surface aera, and density of typical GAs prepared by various methods.
Table 1. Porous features, surface aera, and density of typical GAs prepared by various methods.
AerogelSynthesis
Methods		Reaction
Condition		Density
(mg/cm3)		Porous FeaturesSurface Aera/PorosityApplicationRef.
Graphene
/Fe3O4		Chemical reduction95 °C/3 h
Nahso3One-step		42Macropores
Mesopores		95.22 m2/gAnode material39
GOChemical reduction95 °C/6 h
EDA
Two-stage		3Macropores99.7–99.8%Shock damping/
Energy absorption		41
GOChemical reduction80 °C/24 h
EDA
One-step		4.4–7.9Macropores99.6%Organic absorbent40
CNTs/GOChemical reduction90 °C/24 h
N2H4
Sol-cryo
One-step		0.16–22.4Macropores99.9%Organic absorbent
Conductor		42
SnO2–
graphene		Hydrothermal reduction90 °C/1 h
One-step		/Macropores/Anode material46
GHAsHydrothermal reduction180 °C/3 h/Macropores/Electrode material47
ERGOElectrochemical reduction//Macropores1000 m2/gElectrode material22
CGACross-linking140 °C/2 h
Two-stage		11.1Macropores/Microwave absorption material54
r-EPGMCross-linking150 °C/6 h
Two-stage		/Micropores mesopores
Macropores		>1000 m2/gAdsorbent/
Energy storage material		51
GEACross-linking100 °C/24 h
One-strp		90Macropores/Energy absorbing/
Durable insulation material		52
CNTs/GOTemplateTwo-stage5.7Macropores/Strain sensor29
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jing, J.; Qian, X.; Si, Y.; Liu, G.; Shi, C. Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Aerogels. Molecules 2022, 27, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030924

AMA Style

Jing J, Qian X, Si Y, Liu G, Shi C. Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Aerogels. Molecules. 2022; 27(3):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jing, Jingyun, Xiaodong Qian, Yan Si, Guolin Liu, and Congling Shi. 2022. "Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Aerogels" Molecules 27, no. 3: 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030924

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop