Next Article in Journal
Nutrient Recovery from Digestate of Agricultural Biogas Plants: A Comparative Study of Innovative Biocoal-Based Additives in Laboratory and Full-Scale Experiments
Next Article in Special Issue
Pt2CeO2 Heterojunction Supported on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Robust Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol
Previous Article in Journal
Octocrylene: From Sunscreens to the Degradation Pathway during Chlorination Processes: Formation of Byproducts and Their Ecotoxicity Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Separation of Benzene and Cyclohexane Using Eutectic Solvents with Aromatic Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Separation and Purification of Astragalus membranaceus Polysaccharides by Deep Eutectic Solvents-Based Aqueous Two-Phase System

1
Hunan Electronic Information Industry Institute, Changsha 410012, China
2
Institute of Bast Fiber Crops & Center of Southern Economic Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(16), 5288; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165288
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Deep Eutectic Solvents)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Aqueous two-phase systems (ATPSs) have been widely used in the separation and purification of bioactive substances in recent years. (2) Methods: In this study, deep eutectic solvents (DESs)-based ATPSs were employed for the extraction and separation of Astragalus membranaceus polysaccharides (AMP). The optimal DES (choline chloride:urea = 1:1) was first screened to extract AMP, and the effect of DES concentration, solid–liquid ratio, pH, extraction temperature, and extraction time on the extraction yield of AMP were investigated. (3) Results: The maximum extraction yield was 141.11 mg/g under the optimum conditions. AMP was then preliminarily purified by ATPS, to further realize the recycling and reuse of DES. The effect of type of salts, salt concentration, and extraction temperature on extraction efficiency was investigated. The extraction efficiency was 97.85% for AMP under the optimum ATPS conditions. Finally, the obtained AMP was studied by molecular weight determination, infrared spectroscopy analysis, and monosaccharide composition analysis. (4) Conclusions: This ATPS extraction based on DESs is simple, environmentally friendly, low-cost, and has high extraction efficiency, which provides new ideas for the extraction of plant polysaccharides and other bioactive compounds.

1. Introduction

Astragalus membranaceus, a genus of leguminosae in dicotyledons, is a kind of traditional Chinese medicinal plant and an important raw material of health food [1]. Studies have shown that the bioactive components of Astragalus membranaceus include polysaccharides, saponins, flavonoids, amino acids, and other compounds [2]. Astragalus membranaceus polysaccharide (AMP) is an important active component that has the functions of bacteriostasis, anti-inflammatory, enhancing immunity, and anti-aging [3].
So far, the main methods of AMP extraction include aqueous extraction, enzyme-assisted extraction, ultrasonic extraction, and alkali extraction [4,5,6,7,8]. Aqueous extraction has the disadvantages of low extraction efficiency and is very time-consuming. Although the enzyme-assisted extraction method has high extraction efficiency, it has a high requirement for environmental conditions, so it is not suitable for industrial production. Ultrasonic extraction has high extraction efficiency, but the strong mechanical vibration of the ultrasonic procedure may also destroy the structure of the polysaccharides and reduce the activity of the polysaccharides [6]. The alkali extraction not only has low extraction efficiency but also reduces the bioactivity of polysaccharides.
In 2003, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were first prepared by Abbott and his coworkers, using choline chloride as a hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) and urea as hydrogen bond donor (HBD) [9]. In 2019, Coutihno et al. improved the definition of DES, which provided a solid theoretical basis for further research and application of DES [10]. In the past, traditional organic solvents were widely used to extract bioactive substances. However, these organic solvents are volatile and toxic, which can cause environmental pollution [11]. With the increasing requirements of the public for “green” and “environmental protection”, green chemistry has become one of the research hotspots in recent years. As environmentally friendly solvents, most DESs have the advantages of low toxicity, easy preparation, and good stability [12,13]. Therefore, DESs can be used as good substitutes for traditional organic solvents. At present, DESs have been widely used in the extraction of various natural substances, such as alkaloids [14], polyphenols [15,16], flavonoids [17], hemicellulose [18], lignin [19], etc. DESs are widely used in the extraction of bioactive compounds, but it is difficult to separate DESs from the target products after extraction. Therefore, switchable DESs have been developed, but they still have the disadvantages of difficult preparation and high cost [20].
An aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) is a mixed aqueous solution of either two hydrophilic polymers or a hydrophilic polymer and a salt, which will form two insoluble phases at appropriate concentrations [21,22]. When the target compounds are added to ATPS, they are separated into different phases due to the influence of surface properties and various interaction forces (such as hydrogen bond interaction and ionic bond interaction) [23,24]. Compared with the traditional oil–water solvent extraction systems, ATPS extraction has the advantages of mild operation conditions, excellent biocompatibility, and simple operation [25,26]. At present, ATPSs have been widely used in the extraction and separation of proteins [27,28], antibiotics [29], flavonoids [30], polysaccharides [31,32], and so on. DESs-based ATPSs have drawn more attention in the last few years, which were developed for the extraction of proteins [33], anthraquinones [34], DNA [35], 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) [36], and so on.
In this study, AMP was extracted by using DESs as the extractants to obtain the crude extract; the effect of DES concentration, solid–liquid ratio, pH, extraction temperature, and extraction time on the extraction yield of AMP was studied. Then, ATPS was constructed for the preliminary purification of AMP, and the effect of the type of salt, salt concentration, and extraction temperature on the extraction efficiency was investigated. Finally, AMP was separated from DES by recycling and reusing the DES.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Selection of the Optimal DES

Five DESs were selected as the extractants to extract AMP, and the extraction of AMP using water was used as a control. As shown in Figure 1, the extraction yield of AMP extracted with DES-1 is much higher than that of other DESs and water. This can be attributed to the fact that the HBD in DES-1 is alkaline urea, which is conducive to polysaccharide extraction. It is reported that the polarity, viscosity, and other properties of DESs may also affect the extraction efficiency of DESs; moreover, the hydrogen bond interaction, hydrophobic interaction, van der Waals force, and other interactions between DESs and the target materials can also affect the extraction ability of DESs [37,38]. Therefore, DES-1 was selected for the following studies.

2.2. Single-Factor Experiments of Extraction AMP

In this study, AMP was extracted by solid–liquid extraction. To improve the extraction yield, several main influencing factors (including DES concentration, solid–liquid ratio, pH, extraction temperature, and extraction time) were studied in detail.
DES-1 was selected as the optimal extractant for AMP extraction. The effect of DESs concentration from 60 to 90 wt% on the extraction yield of AMP was studied. The results are shown in Figure 2a, and it can be seen that the extraction yield first increases and then decreases with the increase in DES concentration. When the concentration of DES is 80 wt%, the extraction yield reaches 135.92 mg/g. Because the hydrogen bonding forces are weak when the DESs concentration is small. However, the high DESs concentration will increase the solution viscosity, which is also adverse for extraction. Therefore, 80 wt% DESs concentration was selected for further studies.
The effect of the liquid–solid ratio from 20:1 to 40:1 on the extraction yield of AMP was studied in this work. As shown in Figure 2b, the extraction yield continues to increase with the increase in the liquid–solid ratio. When the liquid–solid ratio is 40:1, the extraction yield reaches 153.07 mg/g. With the increase in the solvent, AMP can dissolve more in the solvent, while excessive solvent will cause waste. The results are similar to the reported literature [39]. Therefore, a liquid–solid ratio of 40:1 was selected for the extraction.
The extraction pH from 7 to 11 was studied. The pH of the system was adjusted by a phosphate buffer solution. It can be seen from Figure 2c that the extraction yield did not change significantly with pH changing. Since the pH of the system itself is 9.2, so the system pH was not adjusted in the following studies.
Extraction temperatures from 40 to 80 °C were investigated. As shown in Figure 2d, the extraction yield increases significantly with the increase in temperature from 40 to 60 °C. When the extraction temperature is 60 °C, the extraction yield reaches 153.07 mg/g. The increase in temperature can reduce the viscosity of DESs and accelerate the mass transfer efficiency of polysaccharides, so the extraction yield increases. However, when the temperature is higher than 60 °C, the extraction yield has no obvious change. Therefore, 60 °C was selected as the optimal temperature.
The effects of extraction times from 30 to 150 min were studied. As shown in Figure 2e, when the extraction time is 30–90 min, the extraction yield of AMP increases significantly with the increase in extraction time. When the extraction time was 30 min, the extraction yield was 127.93 mg/g, and when the extraction time was 90 min, the extraction yield reached 157.78 mg/g. The extraction yield changes little with the further increase in extraction time. The longer extraction time will enhance the cost. Therefore, the extraction time of 90 min was selected.

2.3. Extraction and Preliminary Purification of AMP by ATPS

The types of salt, salt concentration, and temperature are all regarded as critical factors influencing ATPS extraction, so it is necessary to investigate these factors.

2.3.1. Effect of Salt Type on ATPS Extraction

Two representative salts (K2HPO4 and K3PO4) were selected as salting-out reagents. As shown in the results, the AMP extraction efficiency of the DES/K3PO4 system (94.59%) is much higher than that of the DES/K2HPO4 system (56.44%). This can be attributed to the stronger alkalinity of K3PO4, which is conducive to polysaccharides extraction. Thus, the DES/K3PO4 system was chosen for further studies.

2.3.2. Effect of Salt Concentration on ATPS Extraction

The salt concentration is a very important factor in salting-out extraction, so it is necessary to study the effect of salt concentration on ATPS extraction. The effect of salt concentrations in the range of 33–41 wt% was investigated in this work. The results are shown in Figure 3, and it can be seen from the results that the extraction efficiency of AMP (94.14%) is the highest when the salt concentration is 41 wt%. The increase in salt concentration can improve the salting-out ability and facilitate phase separation. Since the salt solution was saturated, the salt concentration could not be increased further. Therefore, a salt concentration of 41 wt% was selected for subsequent studies.

2.3.3. Effect of Temperature on ATPS Extraction

The effect of temperature from 15 to 55 °C on ATPS extraction was investigated. The results in Figure 4 show that temperature has no significant effect on the extraction efficiency of AMP. Therefore, to facilitate the experiment, the follow-up experiments were conducted at room temperature.

2.4. Recycling Studies

The DES-rich phase was separated, the water in DES was removed by drying, and the AMP was extracted according to the optimal conditions. According to this procedure, the DES was recycled and reused for three cycles. As shown in Figure 5, the extraction yield and extraction efficiency of AMP decrease slightly after three cycles. The extraction yield and extraction efficiency of AMP in the third cycle are 131.65 mg/g and 97.51%, respectively. These results proved that DES has good recycling performance in the ATPS extraction process.

2.5. The Analysis of AMP

The molecular weight, monosaccharide composition, and FT-IR for AMP were analyzed. The structural characteristics of polysaccharides, including glycosidic bonds and functional groups, can be analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy. The FT-IR is shown in Figure 6, which confirms the typical characteristic bands of AMP. The strong peak at 3315 cm−1 is ascribed to the stretching vibration of O-H. The weak peak at 2960 cm−1 is related to the stretching vibration of C-H. The absorption bands at 1733 and 1627 cm−1 are caused by C=O asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations. The bond at 1478 cm−1 is the symmetrical deformation vibration of C-H, and the absorption around 1192 cm−1 is the stretching vibrations of the C-O-C and glycosidic bond [40]. The molecular weight of AMP is 4.86 kDa (Table S1 and Figure S1). The monosaccharide analysis of AMP is shown in Table 1 and Figure S2; it can be seen from the results that glucose, rhamnose, and fucose are the main monosaccharides of AMP.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Dried Astragalus membranaceus was purchased from a local drugstore in Changsha, Hunan Province. The dried Astragalus was crushed, sieved (60 mesh), and then stored on a dry and cool site. Choline chloride, urea, ethylene glycol, glycerin, oxalic acid, lactic acid, phenol, sulfuric acid, potassium phosphate, and dipotassium phosphate were all purchased from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All of the chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade.

3.2. Preparation and Characterization of DESs

The DESs were prepared by the heating method [12]. The HBDs and HBAs were stirred and heated at a certain molar ratio at 80 °C for 2 h to obtain a clear liquid. The details of these DESs are shown in Table 2. The characterizations of DESs (HBA: choline chloride) are shown in Figures S3–S7.

3.3. Extraction of Polysaccharides Using DESs

In a 10 mL centrifuge tube, 0.2 g of dried Astragalus powder and a certain volume of DESs were added. AMP was extracted by ultrasonic-assisted heating. After centrifugation, the supernatant was withdrawn to determine the polysaccharide content. The content of polysaccharides was determined by the phenol–sulfuric acid method. The standard curve was obtained using glucose concentration as the abscissa and the absorbance at the 490 nm wavelength as the ordinate. The standard curve is shown in Equation (1). The standard glucose solution is in the concentration range of 2.5–12.5 μg/mL.
y = 32.616 x 0.0104   R 2 = 0.9998
The extraction yield (Y, mg/g) of AMP is calculated by Equation (2).
Y   mg / g = Mass   of   determined   AMP   mg Mass   of   dried   A s t r a g a l u s   m e m b r a n a c e u s   powder   g  

3.4. Separation of Polysaccharides by ATPS

In a centrifuge tube, the crude polysaccharides extract and a certain amount of salt solution (K3PO4 or K2HPO4) were added, and the mixture was fully stirred. After centrifugation, two phases were formed. The volume of each phase was recorded, and the content of polysaccharides in the top and bottom phases were determined, respectively. The extraction efficiency (E, %) of AMP in the bottom phase was calculated by Equation (3).
E % = C 1 × V 1 C 2 × V 2 + C 1 × V 1 × 100 %  
where C1 and V1 represent the AMP concentration and volume of the bottom phase, respectively. C2 and V2 represent the AMP concentration and volume of the top phase, respectively.

3.5. Determination of the Molecular Weight

The molecular weight of AMP was determined by HPLC-RID (LC-20, Shimadzu, Japan; RID-20, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an aqueous gel column (TSKgel GMPWXL, 7.5 mm × 300 mm, TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan). The parameter settings were as follows: the injection volume was 20 µL; the mobile phase was 0.1 mol/L NaNO3 + 0.06% NaN3 solution; the flow rate was 0.6 mL/min; the column temperature was 35 °C.

3.6. Analysis of the Monosaccharide

The Ultimate-3000 HPLC equipped with the Xtimate C18 column (4.6 × 200 mm, 5 µm, Eka Nobel, Sweden) was used to analyze the monosaccharide constituents of the obtained AMP according to the reported method [41]. The parameter settings were as follows: a UV–Vis detector was used at the detection wavelength of 250 nm; the mobile phase was 0.05 mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution (pH = 6.7) and acetonitrile at a ratio of 83:17; the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min; the column temperature was 30 °C; the injection volume was 20 µL.

4. Conclusions

In this study, ATPS based on DESs has been developed for the extraction and preliminary purification of AMP. DES-1 (choline chloride:urea = 1:1) was selected as the optimal extractant. The extraction yield was 141.11 mg/g when the DES concentration was 80 wt%, the solid–liquid ratio was 1:40, the pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 90 min. Afterward, AMP was preliminarily purified by ATPS extraction. The extraction efficiency was 97.85% at the K3PO4 concentration of 41.0 wt% and extraction temperature of 25 °C. The extraction yield and extraction efficiency of AMP decreased slightly after three cycles, which proved that the DESs used in this study had good cyclic stability. The molecular weight determination, monosaccharide analysis, and FT-IR analysis of the obtained AMP were studied. This ATPS based on DESs can be effectively used for the extraction of AMP and allow for the recycling and reuse of extractants, which provides a new idea for the extraction of plant polysaccharides and other bioactive ingredients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27165288/s1, Table S1: The molecular weight of AMP. Figure S1: High-performance gel permeation chromatograms for AMP. Figure S2: The HPLC chromatograms for monosaccharide analysis of AMP. Figure S3: The FT-IR spectra for DES-1. Figure S4: The FT-IR spectra for DES-2. Figure S5: The FT-IR spectra for DES-3. Figure S6: The FT-IR spectra for DES-4. Figure S7: The FT-IR spectra for DES-5.

Author Contributions

Z.T. conceived and designed the experiments; B.L. performed the experiments; Z.T. analyzed the data; B.L. and Z.T. wrote and revised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Huxiang Young Talent Program from Hunan Province (No. 2021RC3116), the Training Program for Excellent Young Innovators of Changsha (No. kq2106073), the earmarked fund for the China Agriculture Research System (No. CARS-16-E24), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (No. ASTIP-IBFC08).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds Astragalus membranaceus are available from the authors.

References

  1. Li, X.; Qu, L.; Dong, Y.; Han, L.; Liu, E.; Fang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T. A Review of Recent Research Progress on the Astragalus Genus. Molecules 2014, 19, 18850–18880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zheng, Y.; Ren, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D.; Liu, Y. A Review of the Pharmacological Action of Astragalus Polysaccharide. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tang, Z.; Huang, G. Extraction, structure, and activity of polysaccharide from Radix astragali. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 150, 113015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seedevi, P.; Moovendhan, M.; Sudharsan, S.; Sivasankar, P.; Sivakumar, L.; Vairamani, S.; Shanmugam, A. Isolation and chemical characteristics of rhamnose enriched polysaccharide from Grateloupia lithophila. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cheng, Z.; Song, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Hu, H.; Zhang, Y. Optimization of microwave-assisted enzymatic extraction of polysaccharides from the fruit of Schisandra chinensis Bail. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 76, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Panadare, D.C.; Gondaliya, A.; Rathod, V.K. Comparative study of ultrasonic pretreatment and ultrasound assisted three phase partitioning for extraction of custard apple seed oil. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 61, 104821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, J.; Ji, H.; Yang, Z.; Liu, A. Relationship between structural properties and antitumor activity of Astragalus polysaccharides extracted with different temperatures. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Teng, C.; Qin, P.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Yao, Y.; Ren, G. Structural characterization and antioxidant activity of alkali-extracted polysaccharides from quinoa. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abbott, A.P.; Boothby, D.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K. Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: Versatile alternatives to ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9142–9147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martins, M.A.R.; Pinho, S.P.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Insights into the Nature of Eutectic and Deep Eutectic Mixtures. J. Solut. Chem. 2019, 48, 962–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duan, L.; Dou, L.L.; Guo, L.; Li, P.; Liu, E.H. Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Eutectic Solvents in Extraction of Bioactive Natural Products. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2405–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, W. Application of Deep Eutectic Solvents in Food Analysis: A Review. Molecules 2019, 24, 4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paetzold, M.; Siebenhaller, S.; Kara, S.; Liese, A.; Syldatk, C.; Holtmann, D. Deep Eutectic Solvents as Efficient Solvents in Biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 943–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, Z.M.; Liu, W.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.Y.; Li, P.; Liu, E.H. Eco-friendly Deep Eutectic Solvents Contribute to Improving the Separation of Isoquinoline Alkaloids in Supercritical Fluid Chromatography. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 13777–13783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El Kantar, S.; Rajha, H.N.; Boussetta, N.; Vorobiev, E.; Maroun, R.G.; Louka, N. Green extraction of polyphenols from grapefruit peels using high voltage electrical discharges, deep eutectic solvents and aqueous glycerol. Food Chem. 2019, 295, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dabetic, N.; Todorovic, V.; Panic, M.; Redovnikovic, I.R.; Sobajic, S. Impact of Deep Eutectic Solvents on Extraction of Polyphenols from Grape Seeds and Skin. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Skarpalezos, D.; Detsi, A. Deep Eutectic Solvents as Extraction Media for Valuable Flavonoids from Natural Sources. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Colombo Dugoni, G.; Mezzetta, A.; Guazzelli, L.; Chiappe, C.; Ferro, M.; Mele, A. Purification of Kraft cellulose under mild conditions using choline acetate based deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 8680–8691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Z.; Ragauskas, A.; Wan, C. Lignin extraction and upgrading using deep eutectic solvents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 147, 112241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pollet, P.; Eckert, C.A.; Liotta, C.L. Switchable solvents. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Asenjo, J.A.; Andrews, B.A. Aqueous two-phase systems for protein separation: A perspective. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 8826–8835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sinha, J.; Dey, P.K.; Panda, T. Aqueous two-phase: The system of choice for extractive fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ebrahimi, T.; Shahriari, S. Extraction of Betanin Using Aqueous Two-Phase Systems. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2016, 89, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaplanow, I.; Goerzgen, F.; Merz, J.; Schembecker, G. Mass Transfer of Proteins in Aqueous Two-Phase Systems. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Darani, S.F.; Ahsaie, F.G.; Pazuki, G.; Abdolrahimi, S. Aqueous two-phase systems based on thermo-separating copolymer for partitioning of doxorubicin. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 322, 114542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahmed, T.; Yamanishi, C.; Kojima, T.; Takayama, S. Aqueous Two-Phase Systems and Microfluidics for Microscale Assays and Analytical Measurements. Annu Rev. Anal. Chem. 2021, 14, 231–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. de Barros, D.P.C.; Campos, S.R.R.; Azevedo, A.M.; Baptista, A.M.; Raquel Aires-Barros, M. Predicting protein partition coefficients in aqueous two phase system. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1470, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asenjo, J.A.; Andrews, B.A. Aqueous two-phase systems for protein separation: Phase separation and applications. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1238, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zakrzewska, M.E.; Nunes, A.V.M.; Barot, A.R.; Fernandez-Castane, A.; Visak, Z.P.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Najdanovic-Visak, V. Extraction of antibiotics using aqueous two-phase systems based on ethyl lactate and thiosulphate salts. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2021, 539, 113022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, S.; Liu, B.; Tang, M.; Yang, J.; Kuang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Qin, J.; Guo, L.; et al. Extraction of flavonoids from Cyclocarya paliurus (Juglandaceae) leaves using ethanol/salt aqueous two-phase system coupled with ultrasonic. J. Food Processing Preserv. 2020, 44, e14469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, Z.; Song, H.; Cao, X.; Shen, Q.; Han, D.; Zhong, F.; Hu, H.; Yang, Y. Simultaneous extraction and purification of polysaccharides from Gentiana scabra Bunge by microwave-assisted ethanol-salt aqueous two-phase system. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 102, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, X.; Teng, G.; Zhang, J. Ethanol/salt aqueous two-phase system based ultrasonically assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Lilium davidiivar. unicolor Salisb: Physicochemical characterization and antiglycation properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 256, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, N.; Wang, Y.; Xu, K.; Huang, Y.; Wen, Q.; Ding, X. Development of green betaine-based deep eutectic solvent aqueous two-phase system for the extraction of protein. Talanta 2016, 152, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deng, W.W.; Zong, Y.; Xiao, Y.X. Hexafluoroisopropanol-Based Deep Eutectic Solvent/Salt Aqueous Two-Phase Systems for Extraction of Anthraquinones from Rhei Radix et Rhizoma Samples. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4267–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, P.L.; Wang, Y.Z.; Chen, J.; Wei, X.X.; Xu, W.; Ni, R.; Meng, J.J.; Zhou, Y.G. A novel aqueous biphasic system formed by deep eutectic solvent and ionic liquid for DNA partitioning. Talanta 2018, 189, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yu, X.; Li, M.; Yagoub, A.E.A.; Chen, L.; Zhou, C.; Yan, D. Switchable (pH driven) aqueous two-phase systems formed by deep eutectic solvents as integrated platforms for production-separation 5-HMF. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 325, 115158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; Xia, Q.; Bi, W.; Chen, D.D.Y. Ecofriendly Mechanochemical Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plants with Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6297–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bi, W.; Tian, M.; Row, K.H. Evaluation of alcohol-based deep eutectic solvent in extraction and determination of flavonoids with response surface methodology optimization. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1285, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shang, X.C.; Chu, D.P.; Zhang, J.X.; Zheng, Y.F.; Li, Y.Q. Microwave-assisted extraction, partial purification and biological activity in vitro of polysaccharides from bladder-wrack (Fucus vesiculosus) by using deep eutectic solvents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 259, 118169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ren, L.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, L.; Gao, F.; Zhou, G. Effect of gamma irradiation on structure, physicochemical and immunomodulatory properties of Astragalus polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cai, C.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W.; Wang, C.; Li, F.; Tan, Z. Temperature-responsive deep eutectic solvents as green and recyclable media for the efficient extraction of polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 123047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of different DESs on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, liquid–solid ratio was 30:1, pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min.
Figure 1. Effect of different DESs on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, liquid–solid ratio was 30:1, pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min.
Molecules 27 05288 g001
Figure 2. The single-factor experiments of AMP extraction. (a) Effect of DESs concentration on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: liquid–solid ratio was 30:1, pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min. (b) Effect of the liquid–solid ratio on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min. (c) Effect of pH on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, the liquid–solid ratio was 40:1, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min. (d) Effect of the extraction temperature on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, the liquid–solid ratio was 40:1, pH was not adjusted, and the extraction time was 60 min. (e) Effect of the extraction time on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DES concentration was 80 wt%, the liquid–solid ratio was 40:1, pH was not adjusted, and the extraction temperature was 60 °C.
Figure 2. The single-factor experiments of AMP extraction. (a) Effect of DESs concentration on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: liquid–solid ratio was 30:1, pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min. (b) Effect of the liquid–solid ratio on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, pH was not adjusted, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min. (c) Effect of pH on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, the liquid–solid ratio was 40:1, the extraction temperature was 60 °C, and the extraction time was 60 min. (d) Effect of the extraction temperature on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DESs concentration was 80 wt%, the liquid–solid ratio was 40:1, pH was not adjusted, and the extraction time was 60 min. (e) Effect of the extraction time on AMP extraction. The extraction conditions were as follows: DES concentration was 80 wt%, the liquid–solid ratio was 40:1, pH was not adjusted, and the extraction temperature was 60 °C.
Molecules 27 05288 g002
Figure 3. Effect of K3PO4 concentration on the extraction efficiency of AMP. The fixed extraction condition: the extraction temperature was 15 °C.
Figure 3. Effect of K3PO4 concentration on the extraction efficiency of AMP. The fixed extraction condition: the extraction temperature was 15 °C.
Molecules 27 05288 g003
Figure 4. Effect of extraction temperature on the extraction efficiency of AMP. The fixed extraction condition: the K3PO4 concentration was 41 wt%.
Figure 4. Effect of extraction temperature on the extraction efficiency of AMP. The fixed extraction condition: the K3PO4 concentration was 41 wt%.
Molecules 27 05288 g004
Figure 5. The extraction yield (Y, mg/g) and extraction efficiency (%) of AMP in the recycling tests.
Figure 5. The extraction yield (Y, mg/g) and extraction efficiency (%) of AMP in the recycling tests.
Molecules 27 05288 g005
Figure 6. The FT-IR spectra of AMP.
Figure 6. The FT-IR spectra of AMP.
Molecules 27 05288 g006
Table 1. The monosaccharide composition of AMP.
Table 1. The monosaccharide composition of AMP.
Monosaccharide CompositionPercentage (%)
Mannose0.3352
Ribose0.079652
Rhamnose7.044621
Glucuronic acid4.45985
Galacturonic acid0.744248
Glucose76.11869
Galactose4.757241
Xylose0.076693
Arabinose0.982739
Fucose5.41545
Table 2. The details of the prepared DESs (HBA: choline chloride).
Table 2. The details of the prepared DESs (HBA: choline chloride).
No.HBDsMolar Ratios
DES-1Urea1:1
DES-2Glycol1:1
DES-3Glycerol1:1
DES-4Oxalate1:1
DES-5Lactic acid1:1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Tan, Z. Separation and Purification of Astragalus membranaceus Polysaccharides by Deep Eutectic Solvents-Based Aqueous Two-Phase System. Molecules 2022, 27, 5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165288

AMA Style

Liu B, Tan Z. Separation and Purification of Astragalus membranaceus Polysaccharides by Deep Eutectic Solvents-Based Aqueous Two-Phase System. Molecules. 2022; 27(16):5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bangfu, and Zhijian Tan. 2022. "Separation and Purification of Astragalus membranaceus Polysaccharides by Deep Eutectic Solvents-Based Aqueous Two-Phase System" Molecules 27, no. 16: 5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165288

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop