Next Article in Journal
Contemporary Mobile Commerce: Determinants of Its Adoption
Previous Article in Journal
Chatbot-Based Services: A Study on Customers’ Reuse Intention
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

After-Sales Attributes in E-Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

1
Graduate Program in Organizations Management, Leadership and Decision (PPGOLD), School of Management, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba 80210-170, PR, Brazil
2
Fundação Dom Cabral—FDC, Av. Princesa Diana, 760 Alphaville, Lagoa dos Ingleses, Nova Lima 34018-006, MG, Brazil
3
Department of Health Management, Federal University of Minas Gerais—UFMG, Av. Alfredo Balena, 190, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, MG, Brazil
4
Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió 57072-900, AL, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18(1), 475-500; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010025
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023

Abstract

:
In recent years, e-commerce has assumed a more strategic and relevant role with regard to the good performance of the global retail industry. The facilities and conveniences provided by e-tail contribute to meeting the demands of a more connected consumer. However, it is necessary to consider the complex nature of the online market, which requires e-retailers to challenge themselves in order to create stronger connections with their customers to achieve greater customer satisfaction. In this context, the services offered in the after-sales phase, one of the most relevant stages of the consumer journey, can help reduce the negative impacts involved in the decision and experience of an online purchase. The post-sale in e-commerce is a research domain that has become increasingly prominent in recent years, and this maturation in the academic environment requires a deeper understanding of this scientific production. Therefore, to synthesize the main insights and suggest an agenda for future studies of this theme, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted for this study using a hybrid approach, combining a structured review with a bibliometric review. One of the main contributions of the research is the seminal presentation of after-sales attributes in e-commerce, in a global and broad view, focusing on the retailer and consumer relationship, referred to herein as After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS). Unlike the other few existing reviews regarding the theme, this work is innovative because it investigates the e-commerce post-purchase, the attributes of this stage, and the relationship between retailer and consumer at this stage of the journey in a more direct, exclusive, and complete way.

1. Introduction

The advent of the internet and its dynamic transformation and expansion have contributed to a new marketing environment and new forms of relationships between brands and consumers [1,2]. In this context, e-commerce plays a leading role in the retail industry [3] and has experienced expressive growth in recent years [4,5,6]. In the first year of the COVID-19 Pandemic, more than 2 billion people made purchases in global online retail, which grew in 2021 [7]. Brands benefit from the broad reach potential of the internet [8], and digital consumers gain from the convenience and ease of e-tailing, which facilitates the adoption of new forms of consumption [9]. The more connected consumers [1] and the increased competitiveness of e-commerce [10] demand from the e-tailers the ability to establish stronger connections with their customers in the pursuit of greater consumer satisfaction [11,12,13,14].
The lack of human contact, the physical distance, the inability to touch, taste or try the product before making the decision [15,16], and the more cautious and skeptical attitude of certain consumers to online purchases [17] make the e-commerce environment more challenging. In this complex context, services offered at the post-sale stage can help reduce the negative impacts surrounding online purchase decisions and consumer satisfaction [18]. The post-sale, post-purchase, or after-sales is one of the stages of the online consumption journey [19] and encompasses everything that happens after the checkout of the digital purchase, such as the delivery process, order tracking, cancellation, and withdrawal decisions during this journey, reverse processes (exchanges and returns after-receipt or, simply, reverse logistics), technical assistance, and support for the consumer concerning adjustments and corrections regarding the purchase [19,20].
Although few studies have focused exclusively on this theme, several important studies have been conducted in this research domain [10,21,22,23], albeit in a complementary approach to the other stages of the online consumption journey [12,23,24]. The topic is strategic in the context of e-commerce [20], and the recent maturation of the theme in the academic environment [25] requires a deeper understanding of this scientific production. In order to synthesize the main insights and suggest an agenda for future research of after-sales in the context of e-commerce, this work produced a Systematic Literature Review from a hybrid approach, combining a structured review with a bibliometric review, which can be characterized as a domain-based review [25]. One of the main contributions of the research is the seminal presentation of after-sales attributes in e-commerce, from a broad and global viewpoint, with a focus on the retailer and consumer relationship, referred to herein as After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS). In addition, suggestions for future research are presented to fill part of the existing gap in academic research.
It is important to highlight the unprecedented nature of this study. From the searches conducted, no review was found that investigates the e-commerce post-purchase, its attributes, and the relationship between retailer and consumer at this stage of the journey in a more direct and complete manner, reinforcing the relevance of the research. De Borba et al. [26], despite addressing in their review the same stage of the customer journey explored in this article, turned to the aspect of returns and its barriers in the context of omnichannel. Other reviews have also addressed certain aspects of the post-purchase [21,22,27,28,29], but in a more specific way and directed at processes or specific elements of this journey, not addressing the same objectives as this study.
The article is structured into the following sections: The next section discusses the method and procedures applied. The third section presents the analyses obtained through the structured review process, followed by a discussion of the results. The fifth section contains the final considerations and the agenda for future studies, which enriches the academic literature [25].

2. Methodological Procedures

Through a Systematic Literature Review, the research is afforded a more comprehensive view of scientific studies that directly address the after-sales stage in e-commerce. The SPAR-4-SLR protocol [25] is applied, and the review is conducted in three sequential steps: (i) assembling; (ii) arranging; and (iii) assessing. Within this path, a hybrid approach is followed, combining a structured review with a bibliometric review, both manifestations of what may be called a domain-based review [25] and addressing the main research objectives.

2.1. First Step: Assembling

The work included the selection of articles that involved empirical research within the domain of after-sales in the context of e-commerce. Although few studies have focused exclusively on this theme, several important studies have been conducted in this research domain, albeit in a complementary approach to the other stages of the online consumption journey [12,23,24]. The topic is strategic in the e-commerce context, and the recent maturation of the theme in the academic environment [25] justifies the need for a review that synthesizes the main insights and provides directions for future research.
To achieve the proposed objectives, the review involved the selection of articles available in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, which allow for a wide coverage of the scientific literature [30,31]. After a review among authors, conversations with experts, and a search for references in papers addressing the topic, keywords were obtained and composed of two groups separated by the Boolean operator “AND”. The first group was composed of variations of the word “after-sales”, and the second group was made up of variations of the word “e-commerce”, present in the title, the abstract, or the keywords of the publications. In addition, it is important to point out that there was no temporal delimitation, nor a delimitation of specific fields of scientific knowledge, which allowed us to understand the evolution of the theme over the years and conduct a more complete investigation [32]. On the other hand, this paper used publications in the English language as an inclusion criterion. Table 1 details the string and findings of this first search.
During the planning and execution of this step, an important task was to verify the existence of any literature review with similar objectives to those of the present work. To do so, from the search with the main string, we filtered all articles that were categorized as review articles, regardless of other classifications. Nine review articles were found within the theme in the Scopus database and five in the Web of Science database, totaling 11 literature reviews after eliminating duplicate articles. Overall, it can be stated that none of the 11 literature reviews found in the initial selection addressed the specific relationship between the post-sales journey and e-commerce. While some of these papers did not meet the criteria for classification as a literature review [33,34], others explored consumer behavior and its relationship with e-commerce without delving into the post-purchase stage [35] or addressed different perspectives from the one proposed by the present paper, such as information systems [35] or the supply chain in e-commerce [36]. Other literature reviews that were found addressed only certain elements of post-purchase [21,22,26,27], not focusing on the same objectives as the present study. All these review papers were excluded from the present research.

2.2. Second Step: Arranging

In the second stage of conducting the literature review, the present work adopted inclusion criteria for choosing the documents that would compose the final text corpus, as detailed in Figure 1. Duplicate articles (100 duplicate articles), those without a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) (22 articles), and in press articles (10 surveys) were removed. The resulting 160 articles were submitted to content analysis in order to verify four other inclusion criteria: (1) if the research was empirical; (ii) if the article adhered to the objectives of the present paper, i.e., if there was a correlation between the two groups of keywords used in Section 2.1 “First Step: Assembling”; (iii) if the evaluation of the after-sales step was part of the research objective of the previously selected paper; and (iv) if the research was conducted from the Business-to-Consumer (BTC) perspective. These inclusion criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consultation with a third reviewer. A total of 108 articles were excluded, and the subsequent steps of this work followed with 52 articles, listed in Appendix A.

2.3. Third Step: Assessing

In the third step of conducting the literature review, the final text corpus was analyzed by means of a hybrid approach involving structured review and bibliometric study. To do so, the reviewers re-evaluated all the articles selected in the “Second Step: Arranging”. They identified the main themes discussed in each article to create a unified list and a convergence coding matrix to summarize similarities and differences directly related to the research topic in the different articles. All the articles were ranked based on comparisons between the coding of the two reviewers, and a consensus was reached after three rounds of discussion. The qualitative clustering of the 52 articles considered only issues directly related to the research topic, although the scope of the articles analyzed could be much broader. Four clusters related to after-sales services in the e-commerce BTC relationship were formed: (i) fulfillment; (ii) return and refund; (iii) customer support; and (iv) ratings and comments.
The structured review produced a synthesis of the content [25] for each cluster, while the bibliometric study identified the trends in the development of the academic literature on the subject, its evolution over the years, and other information of a descriptive, considering data on publications, journals, authors, and geographical reference [25]. A bibliographic coupling analysis was also performed to enrich the literature review. The present work was supported by software such as Bibliometrix, Excel, Iramuteq, Vosviewer, and Voyant Tools [37,38,39].

3. Results

3.1. Structured Review

3.1.1. Trends and Thematic Analysis: After-Sales Customer Services

Considering the retailer and consumer relationship, the post-sale is the stage of the purchase journey that encompasses everything that happens after the purchase process [40,41,42,43]. When relating this same stage of the e-commerce journey, researchers define it similarly, being distinct when referencing new elements that arise in the context of the online relationship. In this context, the post-sale begins after the final click in the shopping cart, or checkout, the moment when the order is monitored, delivery is guaranteed within the agreed period, and the retailer provides all the support and services to answer the questions and make corrective actions demanded by the consumer [19,20,44]. Scientific studies involving this stage have been little explored in exclusive academic research [12,24] but have drawn interest from researchers in recent years [10,21,22,23]. Although there is an exception [45], the academic perspective shows the strategic importance of this stage in the consumer journey and the indispensability of good after-sales management for online retail success [19,20]. According to the parameters of this Systematic Literature Review, it can be observed, in Figure 2, that the number of studies on the subject has seen substantial growth since 2017. Until this date, there were few publications that explored the central theme of the correlation between e-commerce and after-sales in either a direct or indirect way. Considering the same text corpus of this research, from 2002 (the first year captured in this review) to 2010, with the exception of 2007, only one article was published annually. The interval from 2011–2021 (the last year considered in this study) comprises around 80% of all the articles in this study, while the period of 2017–2021 comprises 62% of the entire volume of the text corpus. This shows that the theme, although relevant to the daily lives of organizations, continues to move towards its academic maturation, demonstrating an upward trend for the coming years.
While some research in the textual corpus of this paper evaluates all stages of the online consumer purchase journey [46,47,48,49], other papers focus on empirical analysis exclusively at the post-sale stage [2,24,50,51,52,53,54,55]. Figure 3 presents the percentage of the occurrence of each of these perspectives. On the other hand, in general, this review points out that the constituent elements of the service pool offered at this stage of the online shopping journey, here called After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS), are present in all the articles selected for the systematic review. These articles use after-sales attributes to assess the role of AFSCS in online consumer behavior, suggesting strategies to retailers on how to attract, retain, and satisfy customers [56], generate satisfaction and loyalty [57] as well as increase perceived usefulness and ease of use [57] to maximize transaction volume and reduce costs [56]. Order tracking, a request fulfillment process through logistics services, communication at all stages of the journey, customer service, a process of exchanges, returns and refunds, post-sales evaluations, and comments are some of the post-sale attributes that make up the AFSCS, which were aggregated qualitatively into four clusters, described in detail below.

Fulfillment

This work considered that all services offered in e-commerce involving click-to-door, i.e., from the moment of purchase until the moment the consumer receives the product, are characterized here as fulfillment. In other words, fulfillment represents the seller’s ability to meet the online consumer’s demands in a reliable, efficient, and accurate manner [47]. This includes the total logistical management of the delivery process, the tracking of what is being delivered, the ability to meet the customer’s expectations during the waiting phase, and the fulfillment of the SLA (Service Level Agreement) agreed upon with the consumer [58,59]. Fulfillment is a factor that cannot be ignored. As stated by certain authors, “fulfillment is an important means to improve one’s confidence in online transactions” [60], p. 567.
These AFSCS elements are found, jointly or alternately, in 45% of the analyzed studies [2,12,19,20,46,47,50,57,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76], reinforcing this theme’s importance for post-sale e-commerce strategies. Most of the evaluated works identified the main determinants of e-satisfaction in the processes related to fulfillment and their potential to promote online consumer satisfaction. Reliability and security were considered fundamental constructs by consumers and needed to be better explored and ensured at this stage [19]. Additionally, among the assumptions agreed upon at the time of purchase, receiving the product that was actually purchased is crucial to the reinforcement of the consumer’s post-purchase satisfaction [46]. Other factors that can ensure better control of processes and confirmation of expectations that lead to the e-consumer’s satisfaction involve tracking the order [46,50,64], periodic notifications through various channels, delivery management by the consumer (the power to change data and request status) [64,76], and the possibility of checking the package received together with the delivery person [64]. It is also important to emphasize that, when analyzing the current context of omnichannel, studies stress that the convenience of delivery achieved through the choice of channel by the consumer can also be very relevant in the drive for satisfaction in the post-purchase stage [46].
Studies evaluating online consumer behavior, such as those related to consumer expectancy [67], purchase intention [66,74], and loyalty represented by repurchase intention [2,20,47,57,61,62,65,69,72], have also been conducted from the fulfillment perspective. It is important to point out that repurchase intention is ultimately the overall goal of many articles evaluated in this systematic review. The relevance and research interest in the topic can be explained by the context in which the role of repeat purchases is becoming more evident in ensuring greater retail sustainability since it increases the lifetime value of the final consumer. Empirical studies prove the direct relationship between the offer of fulfillment services and the promotion of repeat purchases: guaranteed delivery time, delivery quality as expected, and tracking the order are some examples [2,57,62,65]. In this movement, services offered by technological tools from SaaS (Software as a Service) companies can help retail managers to minimize the negative experience resulting from intercurrences that are usual in the delivery logistics process [72]. Finally, it can be pointed out that in addition to promoting loyalty through repurchase intention, good fulfillment services have the potential to stimulate loyalty through the consumer’s positive post-purchase recommendation of the seller [20].

Return and Refund

In contrast to fulfillment, which is comprised of the services included in the click-to-door stage, the cluster named return and refund refers to the after-sales services provided after the consumer receives the product. It is important to highlight that some services may be exclusively refunds for specific reasons, such as Price Match Guarantee (PMG) campaigns [77] or refund plus return that may be present in earlier stages of the post-purchase [53,77]. According to Wood [78], at some point in the consumer’s buying journey, the consumer will make a decision about whether or not to keep the product he or she has purchased. Products may be returned for several reasons, and the volume of returned products depends on the type of retail market and the channel in which the commercial transactions occur. In the e-commerce business environment, product returns are even more critical, as the customer does not touch, feel or try the products beforehand [15,16,79]. Thus, understanding the process that encompasses the complexity of e-commerce and consumer behavior has proven to be indispensable for retail success and sparked considerable interest in academic research [2,12,14,20,24,46,50,52,53,66,67,68,69,70,71,74,76,77,80,81].
In the return and refund cluster, studies were also identified that emphasized efficient management of reverse services, which presupposes reducing them rather than fostering them. These studies have confirmed that by fostering greater online consumer satisfaction at some stage of the purchase journey, product returns [14] could be avoided, or monetary incentives could be used as potential substitutes for return intention [14]. For example, promoting consumer satisfaction and an alternative to increasing return rates could be achieved by the use of a virtual fitting room (VFR) [81]. However, while incentive mechanisms to prevent product returns can be effective in many circumstances, research has shown that they alone do not represent a sustainable competitive advantage since they can be easily copied [14]. In addition to increasing online consumer satisfaction, product return, exchange, and maintenance services have the potential to contribute to the generation of greater trust, loyalty [24], and fidelity [12]. Trust has been shown to be an effective mediator in the relationship between consumer satisfaction and loyalty [24].
Appropriate return policies can also be instrumental in ensuring consumer satisfaction after a purchase [71,76]. Moreover, such policies can encourage the initial purchase decision process [80], setting expectations about the return process as an incentive to convert an online visit into a purchase. On the other hand, it is important to emphasize that the influential role of policies depends on the retail sector in question, as well as the geographical, political, social, and cultural contexts [50].
Finally, although investments in return and refunds are debated and have controversial results, it is worth considering that efficiency and quality criteria should be observed and practiced to retain customers and lead them to make further visits to the online channel. In this respect, rapid execution, good communication during the entire purchase process, credibility, trust, and an excellent cost-benefit ratio for the consumer can be decisive in the drive for buyer loyalty [20].

Customer Support

The cluster named customer support addresses the evaluation of consumer support services, such as customer service, after-sales support, and communication in general, as well as the level of quality of these services involving the retailer’s responsiveness [45,76]. This cluster encompasses diverse themes and is included in 55% of the articles analyzed in the systematic literature review [2,4,12,13,19,20,43,45,46,48,51,57,62,63,64,65,68,69,70,71,75,76,80,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
Consumer trust is a well-explored construct in this cluster. Some works demonstrate the role played by sales platforms in their ability to fulfill their psychological contract with the consumer and the power of this contract to generate trust. Fulfilling the psychological contract reflects the consumer’s belief that the other party will fulfill its reciprocal obligation in a transactional relationship. It is a concept explored for different types of e-commerce, such as social commerce [87,88]. We must also consider the role of communication between the platform/seller and the whole post-purchase experience as essential for building trust, which stems from the consumer’s perception and the quality of customer support. In this respect, the convenience of customer support services in post-purchase contributes directly to customer satisfaction and loyalty, which is represented, in most cases, by the intention to repurchase [13,43,51,57,69,71,86].
Another important concept addressed in this cluster is that of adjusted expectations [85]. Whenever a consumer has a consumption experience, they learn from this experience, and this can change their expectations [90]. Post-consumption expectations are so-called adjusted expectations and may or may not guide this customer to consume again [91]. The better a consumer’s experience, the better the expectations adjustment, corroborating engagement with and returning to the channel. Therefore, concern over constant monitoring of the entire customer service and support experience is reinforced. There are several efforts and experiments that have sought the best way to establish frictionless communication and support between consumer and retailer, either through the efficiency of human effort or even solutions presented by artificial intelligence tools [92,93].

Ratings and Comments

The last cluster is rating and comments, representing the papers that presented sellers’ ratings and online consumer comments that endorse the positive role of AFSCS and the good purchase and post-purchase experience for other consumers. It is important to clarify that consumer comments and evaluations in the papers of this cluster are explored as research objects and not as a secondary data collection method. Therefore, the origin of a comment and its ability to directly influence consumer behavior were evaluated [49,54,55,94,95,96,97,98]. It should be pointed out that understanding this cause-and-effect relationship is a source of continuous feedback for the improvement of operational and service delivery since the feedback can guide corrective actions and the consequent improvement of future shopping experiences for consumers.
Online consumer comments and ratings are referred to as online word-of-mouth or e-Word-of-Mouth (eWOM), which represent any and all positive or negative statements made by users, customers, or consumers about a product or company, which are made available online for access by a large number of people [99]. The article [94] explores the seminal nature of these elements on the marketplace platform eBay and characterizes comments into three types of feedback: positive, neutral, and negative. The study shows that there are several factors that can influence the nature of consumer evaluations, such as the length of time the seller has existed, the maturity of the consumer as an e-commerce user, and the provenance and quality of the products evaluated.
Customer satisfaction has also been evaluated in some studies that analyzed the impact of comments and ratings left by users [49,55,97]. All types of opinions can affect the level of customer satisfaction, and the greater the number of comments and opinions on a specific point, or the more positive or more negative the comments, the greater the potential impact on the level of satisfaction. In this way, the studies value the constant exercise of evaluating feedback and how quickly retailers adapt, whether in corrective terms or with continuity of action. It is important to emphasize the encouragement of positive comments since they can help reduce post-purchase cognitive dissonance, increasing consumer satisfaction. Ratings and comments can also have an impact on consumer trust [98], consumer engagement [95], and a consequent purchase intention [96], even generating loyalty expressed by the repurchase intention [54] from the positive interference of the eWOM in the post-purchase. On the other hand, there are also circumstances in which comments and ratings can be detrimental. When there is an explicit effort by retailers to sponsor positive comments that encourage consumption, and the consumer’s experience is negative in the post-purchase, this is more likely to result in loss and regret on the part of the seller [54].

3.1.2. World Cloud

The word cloud analysis, which presents the grouping of words that occur more frequently in a given interval or corpus, allows quick and superficial identification of the main content of this group [37,100]. By means of Iramuteq software, the researchers obtained 5 different clouds, which represent the four different clusters described in the previous section, and one with an overview of the 52 abstracts of all the articles in the textual corpus of this review. Figure 4 graphically demonstrates the most prevalent words in these analyzed clusters.
The first, which encompasses all the documents in the corpus, presents the words “customer”, “online”, “consumer”, “post-purchase”, “influence”, “service”, and “satisfaction” as the words with the highest rates of occurrence. Directly related to the thematic convergence of the studies produced by the correlation established between the keywords, it is clear that the content of the works delves into the online experience of the customer and the consumer, not only in the post-purchase phases but also in other stages of the consumer journey, since the word “purchase” also gains prominence. This corroborates the already presented analysis that studies focused on post-sales still lack exclusive research despite showing a growing trend in recent years. Another interesting point is the presence, with higher occurrence, of the word “service” compared with the word “product”, which demonstrates the power that the services offered have in the context of online shopping, and especially post-purchase, to obtain greater consumer “satisfaction”. A reading of the second cloud shows that the articles classified in the fulfillment cluster, in addition to highlighting the main words of the previous cloud, present a greater proportional occurrence of the word “service”. This denotes the whole package of distinct services already described within this post-sales phase. Another word that is evident is “convenience”, a quality widely pursued step by step within the fulfillment services. The third cloud, in turn, contains the main words highlighted in the previous clusters, with the difference being the higher occurrence of the words “return” and “product”, which refer directly to the content of the works present in this cluster. The prevalent words in the fourth graph, which refers to the customer support cluster, are “customer” and “online”, as well as “satisfaction” and “influence”, in addition to “service” and “post-purchase”. This reinforces the after-sales attributes explored in this group. Finally, the last cloud is the one with the greatest variation of words. Directly linked to the theme developed in these papers, words such as “comment”, “review”, “word-of-mouth”, “outcome”, and “brand” highlight the role that ratings and comments play as endorsements of the positive role of AFSCS.

3.1.3. Typological Analysis

Complementing the word cloud analysis, a typological analysis enables the identification and interpretation of the most prominent words in a given theme. Following the Descending Hierarchical Classification (DHC) method, the typology was extracted with the help of Iramuteq software [37,101]. From the evaluation and systematized reading of the 52 abstracts available in the corpus, the automated process obtained 231 textual segments, of which 183 (79.22%) were classified. According to Camargo and Justo [100], retention must be at least 70% to achieve statistical significance in the analysis. Regarding the categorization of words, the software presented a result of four clusters, within which the authors selected only those words with chi-square statistics greater than 3.80 (x2 > 3.80) and with probability values less than 5% (p-value less < 0.05), indicators that attribute greater significance in the association of words within their respective classes [101].
Table 2 presents in detail the four groups formed in this analysis. The first and second clusters concentrate words concerning the e-commerce business universe, in perspective, focused more on retail performance, the stages of the e-commerce journey, and the strategy and technologies available that are at the service of the good practice of online sales. Cluster 3, in turn, entitled post-purchase behavior, focuses more directly on the consumer experience and satisfaction at this stage of the online journey, in which words that refer to constructs in the field of consumer behavior studies, such as “satisfaction”, “expectation”, “intention” and “loyalty”, prevail. With further regard to this theme, it is interesting to note, above all, the emphasis on the term “repurchase-intention”, which is one of the terms of greatest research interest in empirical studies of after-sales highlighted in this systematic literature review [2,47,61,72,86]. The last cluster, classified as after-sales attributes, presents as most relevant the terms referring to the AFSCS elements. Attributes of fulfillment, customer support, return, and after-sales services, in general, are highlighted and very significant.

3.2. Bibliometric Review

3.2.1. Descriptive Analysis of the Corpus

The text corpus, obtained by searching the Scopus and Web of Science databases, contains publications from 43 different journals and 124 authors and co-authors. Among the scientific publications, only the Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services published three of the corpus documents, and only seven published two documents. The others published only one of the papers in the total corpus. Table 3 presents those that stand out with more than one publication.
Only eight papers are of single authorship, while the other 44 were produced through the cooperation of two or more researchers, which generates a collaboration index of 2.64, as presented in Figure 5. The cluster presents an average of 2.38 authors per paper and 2.46 co-authors per paper. It is important to point out, as postulated by Lotka’s Law [102,103], that only four of the authors participated in more than one research: Jun, M.; Khalifa, M.; Lekhawipat, W.; Lin, C.H. are co-authors of two papers. Complementing these bibliometric indices, Figure 5 also shows that there were, on average, 35.88 citations per paper and an average of 4.12 citations per year. Finally, it can be pointed out that the searches carry 240 keywords.
Regarding the nationality of the researchers, the countries that have contributed most to the development of the theme are China, the United States, and India (Figure 6). Although still incipient, some authors from countries like China, the United States, Malaysia and Lithuania have conducted their research in collaboration with scholars from different regions, which may demonstrate the beginning of the theme’s maturation process, especially in these countries. On the other hand, a great deal of scientific production continues to be developed without exchanges between different countries, denoting a delay in the progress of the topic in broader terms. It is important to consider that even though publications have intensified over the last 5 years, there is still a lack of collaboration between countries. It is also worth pointing out that, in addition to the predominance of studies developed in the United States, Asian countries are also involved, not only in terms of the origin of the researchers but also in the geographical region where studies have been conducted, as shown in Figure 7. Fifty percent of the studies were carried out in the context of Asian countries (with emphasis on China, India, and Taiwan), which coincides with the booming growth of the online channel in the region in recent years [104,105,106,107,108,109].

3.2.2. Bibliographic Coupling Analysis

Bibliographic coupling analysis (BCA) is rich for bibliometric studies because it allows the mapping of research fronts under development in a given area, which tends to be an indicator for the future. Unlike co-citation analysis, which highlights past approaches by pointing out authors who are co-cited in the articles under analysis in a given Literature Review [110], BCA presents the strength of the connection between two articles, also through a process of searching for similarities, but highlighting the overlap in their bibliographies. The greater the number of references in common, the greater the proximity between the analyzed works, indicating the existence of a similarity relationship that may be theoretical, thematic, methodological, or of some other shared feature [111,112,113]. In this research, the bibliographic coupling was aided by Vosviewer software, by means of the “Association Strength” method. From a total of 52 articles, 49 were captured and composed the final result of the network of documents with the most connections, represented in Figure 8. The reading returned four clusters, showing the greatest proximity between the articles represented by their respective authors.
Cluster 1, represented by the color red in the graph, demonstrates that the authors with the most references in common are Khalifa; Liu [86], in addition to Jiang et al. [67], Kuo; Wu [51] and Otim; Grover [62]. All of them address the investigation of repurchase intention behavior, which can also be mediated by the level of services offered by retailers in after-sales. Khalifa and Liu [86], in the paper entitled “Online consumer retention: contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience”, seek to empirically demonstrate the role that the post-purchase experience plays in impacting consumer satisfaction, which in turn contributes to repurchase intention. When addressing the influence of post-purchase attributes on consumer behavior, Jiang et al. [67] and Otim and Grover [62] highlight, above all, the fulfillment package services. It is important to point out that, as shown by the more central positioning, the works present in this cluster dialogue resemble in a more balanced and stronger way with all the other three clusters.
The color green represents Cluster 2, in which Choudhury and Karahanna [89] stand out, with the highest number of references shared with the other articles. The work entitled “The relative advantage of electronic channels: A multidimensional view” presents important elements that guide the consumer’s decision when choosing a purchase channel, pointing out the crucial role of post-purchase services in this context and turning to more varied attributes of Customer Support. Taylor et al. [83], while setting out to investigate consumer loyalty, present important determinants of post-purchase as enhancers of repurchase intention in this channel. Like Choudhury and Karahanna [89], they also look into services that can be characterized as Customer Support, which is prevalent in papers classified in this group. Another important similarity between these two cited pieces is the use of the trust variable, within the consumer behavior theme, as a moderator of the study.
Qazi et al. [49] and Wu et al. [95] stand out with the highest number of shared references in Cluster 3. This is a cluster of papers where the study of the impact of comments and ratings left by consumers on the actions of other customers is highlighted. These papers focus on understanding the leveraging or detracting potential of eWOM (e-Word-of-mouth) on the positive attitude of other consumers, which proves to be a promising topic in the field of e-commerce after-sales research. Finally, it is worth noting that the articles in this group are more recent in terms of publication date compared with the average of the other clusters, reinforcing the more recent nature of the topic.
Finally, Cluster 4 has the lowest number of classified research. Only five papers were segmented in this universe, presenting papers published in the last 5 years. In general, the articles explore the construct of consumer satisfaction in the post-purchase context. They highlight the preponderant role of the positive influence of delivery logistics and fulfillment services, in addition, to return and refund services, in generating greater consumer satisfaction, purchase intention, and consumer loyalty. Notable here, with the highest number of shared references, are the articles by authors Xu et al. [74] and Cao et al. [50].

4. Discussion

In the complex context of e-commerce, after-sales services [19] can help to reduce the negative impacts surrounding online purchase decisions and consumer satisfaction [17,18]. Scientific studies investigating this stage of the consumer journey, despite research interest in more recent years [10,21,22,23], with significant growth in publications as of 2017, are still lacking in terms of unique research [12,24]. Of all the papers in the corpus, with 2002 as the year of the first publication analyzed, the review showed that only 15% of the papers investigated only the post-sale phase of online commerce. The descriptive analysis of the corpus indicated that 124 authors and co-authors are responsible for the development of the 52 papers present in this study, published in 43 different journals. There is a low concentration of research developed by a single author and published in a single journal. Furthermore, it was shown that authors from China, the United States, and India make the most contributions to the scientific development of the theme. It was also shown that the most frequently researched contexts are Asian markets in general, representing half of all studies, and the United States market, representing about 20% of the articles in this review. Collaboration between different countries in conducting studies, although identified among nations such as China, the United States, Malaysia, and Lithuania, remains incipient.
The Systematic Literature Review performs a thematic analysis of the corpus articles and groups them into clusters derived from the identified After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS) group. AFSCS, characterized in this paper as the pool of services offered in the e-commerce after-sales stage, is present in all the articles selected for this review. These articles use post-sale attributes to assess the role of AFSCS in online consumer behavior, suggesting strategies for retailers on how to attract, retain, and satisfy customers [56], generate satisfaction and loyalty [57], as well as increase perceived usefulness and ease of use [57] to maximize transaction volume and reduce costs [56]. The fulfillment, return and refund, customer support, and ratings and comments clusters grouped the papers that addressed elements and services with similar characteristics in the nature of delivery and in the timing of emergence and availability in the e-commerce post-purchase journey. The fulfillment cluster considered papers that investigate, in some way, all services offered within the click-to-door stage, i.e., from the moment of purchase until the moment the consumer receives the product. Papers addressing this topic are prevalent, identified in 45% of the research in the corpus. The return and refund cluster, in turn, considers the after-sales services made available after the consumer receives the product, while the customer support cluster evidences more diverse services concerning the retailer’s availability and responsiveness throughout the entire after-sales journey, such as customer service, after-sales support, and communication in general. As it is more comprehensive, 55% of the articles in this text corpus feature some of these elements. Finally, the ratings and comments cluster segments the research that features sellers’ ratings and online consumer comments that endorse the positive role of AFSCS and the good buying and post-purchasing experience for other consumers. eWOM constitutes a highly relevant concept that requires more strategic control.
All the research, in general, points to a positive influence of AFSCS on consumer behavior. This impact may be to strengthen a positive post-purchase behavior attitude of the consumer, as well as a positive effect on other consumers’ purchase intention behavior and subsequently post-purchase intention. Constructs such as consumer satisfaction, expectation and confirmation of expectations, loyalty, trust, and purchase and repurchase intention are widely discussed in the reviewed papers. Figure 9 presents a framework of AFSCS and their dynamics in the e-commerce post-purchase journey as a synthesis of the thematic analysis of the textual corpus of this review.
The work also presents a typological analysis of the articles of the AFSCS large grouping, through which it arrived at 4 clusters: e-tail business; business and technology; post-purchase behavior; and after-sales attributes. The results obtained with the aid of Iramuteq software support the importance of post-sales and its attributes and services for the effective management of e-commerce businesses and the promotion of consumer satisfaction. Words such as “satisfaction”, “loyalty”, “consumer expectation”, and “repurchase intention” are highlighted and complemented, mainly in the After-sales attributes cluster, with other terms such as “return”, “order”, “track”, “ship”, “support”, and “post-sales services”.
The bibliographic coupling analysis revealed four groups, in which we highlight some works that share important references and that are consequently more closely connected. In this work, the thematic similarity is highlighted as a link strengthening the connection, and there is a convergence among the works in pointing out the role of post-purchase attributes and services as elements of reinforcement of positive attitudes towards consumer behavior. The clusters aid a better view of the path toward which the academic research of this topic is oriented.
Although most scientific studies have not yet delved into the exclusive investigation of the e-commerce after-sales, the attributes of this stage of the consumer journey play an important role in achieving a positive retail performance in online channels. The results obtained by most of the articles of the analyzed text corpus corroborate this perspective and point out a good possibility for the continuity of this line of research, which is expected to be a growing trend in the coming years.

5. Conclusions and Future Research Agenda

Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), this paper sought to synthesize the main insights of scientific studies and the future research direction on the theme of after-sales in the context of e-commerce. Despite being recent and with few articles dedicated to studying the theme exclusively, the research domain is relevant, strategic, and in a phase of maturity. Although it is part of an approach that is mostly complementary to the other stages of the online consumption journey [12,23,24], e-commerce after-sales have attracted more attention in recent years, and the topic is engaging more researchers.
One of the major contributions of this review is the presentation of after-sales e-commerce attributes and the influence of these elements on consumer behavior from the point of view of service provision by the retailer to the customer and the consumer. From the reading of the articles in the corpus, the After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS) explored in these works guide their segmentation into sub-clusters, producing a thematic synthesis on four fronts: (i) fulfillment; (ii) return and refund; (iii) customer support; and (iv) ratings and comments. The discussion of each of these clusters highlights the important and strategic role of good management of the post-purchase experience in the drive for consumer satisfaction, as well as repurchase intention and loyalty to the online channel. Although each sub-group presents its specific features, there is a complementary role between the services highlighted in each, demonstrating the need to understand the post-purchase journey in a more systemic and non-fragmented way.

5.1. Future Research Agenda

The after-sales issue is very relevant to the e-commerce context, and the recent maturation of the theme in the academic environment shows the evolution of research interest. However, the review has pointed out that gaps remain that need to be addressed in future research.

5.1.1. Exclusive After-Sales Studies

Among the articles selected for this systematic literature review, only 15% produced an exclusive investigation of the post-sales stage of e-commerce. This demonstrates an avenue of opportunities for further empirical studies that evaluate this step, its context, and the strategic potential for online retail in greater detail and with more depth.

5.1.2. Longitudinal Studies: Detailing the After-Sales Journey, Relationship between Constructs and Purchase Recurrence

In general, research focuses on a more specific analysis of the relationship between retailer and customer, which leaves a gap for the application of longitudinal studies that can analyze the relationship between constructs of post-purchase attributes and consumer behavior at different moments of the journey of the same consumer. This is justified by the need to understand the impact of certain elements in different scenarios and contexts, as well as an opportunity to increase the influence capacity of certain attributes and their combination in producing an effect over a longer period of time. Furthermore, longitudinal studies enable an investigative design that can better understand the linear construction from the first contact between consumer and brand and the evolution of this relationship to repeat purchase. Although the framework presented in the last section of this article alludes to the theme, it still does not substantiate, present and explain the recurrence of the online channel based on a continuous construction and a linking relationship that has been present since its inception.

5.1.3. Post-Purchase Behavior

Although this is a debated topic and is present in some of the analyzed articles [61], it is important to consider that it is not the study’s objective to gain a deeper understanding of the post-purchase behavior of the consumer itself. This review focused, as already mentioned, on the relationship between retailer and consumer and the relevant role of After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS) in moderating this relationship in the post-purchase period. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies, including other meta-narratives, strive to directly assess post-purchase behavior and, consequently, repurchase intention as the main driver of the study.

5.1.4. Application of the Studies in Different Market Contexts and Geographical Regions

Studies conducted in the North American and Asian marketing contexts are prevalent. Emerging markets, such as Latin America, and mature ones, such as Europe, lack more studies dedicated to the after-sales of online commerce. In addition, today, we see a significant growth of so-called cross-border e-commerce (in which retailers facilitate their internationalization through online sales to consumers in other countries) [114,115], which also opens up an avenue of opportunities for studies that explore the transnational perspective and its cultural, technical and business challenges for post-purchase management that contributes to the growth and good performance of e-commerce.
Furthermore, more detailed studies of specific retail sectors constitute a research opportunity that can identify the greater or lesser power of the influence of each package of services and after-sales attributes, for example, in the behavior of the consumer in each of these sectors. Understanding these possible combinations could aid strategic definition and retail managerial decision-making.
Finally, it is also worth considering the new e-commerce configuration models, which explore new channels and new media, such as the omnichannel and social commerce perspective.

5.1.5. Delving Deeper into Each of the Clusters Presented in this Review

Another research opportunity is an in-depth look at each of the clusters presented here, from After-sales Customer Services (AFSCS) to e-commerce. This seminal study presents four broad research fronts that allow theoretical, conceptual, within the research domain and practical deepening for the management of retail organizations. There is also great potential in understanding, in a targeted way, the role of each of the AFSCS attributes in promoting more repeat purchases in electronic retail.

5.1.6. eWOM and Disconfirmation and Dissonance Concepts

Although concepts such as e-Word-of-mouth (e-WOM), disconfirmation, and dissonance are discussed in some works [43,49,95], there is ample opportunity for deeper study. eWOM has begun to be more widely discussed and studied [116], based on studies that seek to delve into post-purchase consumer behavior and its influence on the attitude of other consumers. The thematic cluster of ratings and comments presents, in a segmented way, research that includes this perspective. However, this concept will require further research, especially with the growth of social commerce and social selling. The difference between dissonance and disconfirmation and the relationship of these constructs with after-sales attributes is another opportunity for future research.

5.1.7. The Role of Technology in the Development of Post-Purchase E-Commerce

The outsourcing of post-purchase services, through the automation offered by technology platforms and systems, fundamentally represented by SaaS services (Software as a Service), has proven to be economically viable to advance the level of service of online retailers. Understanding this market and how it contributes to the maturation of operational excellence and experience in e-commerce is an emerging topic with the potential to be explored through case studies, for example, which can be built by strategies of multiple comparative studies between different technical, service delivery, and geographical activities.

5.2. Limitations

Despite the scope of the study and the basis for building the review based on a clearly delimited objective, some limitations need to be pointed out: (i) the methodological path limited the search to the Scopus and Web of Science databases; (ii) the choice of only articles that included the investigation of some element of the after-sales of e-commerce in their research aims puts restrictions on the study; (iii) only articles in English were considered; (iv) although the search string is broad enough to meet the scope and objective of the study, there are newer terms that appear in the findings and elucidate the advancement of the practice of e-commerce, which opens up potential avenues for future research.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to all aspects of the study and reviewed the results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Editor and Anonymous reviewers for their constructive input and kind feedback.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Textual Corpus.
Table A1. Textual Corpus.
AuthorsTitleJournalYear
Burroughs, R.E., Sabherwal, R. [45]Determinants of retail electronic purchasing: A multi-period investigationINFOR2022
Cao, Y., Gruca, T.S. [19]The influence of pre- and post-purchase service on prices in the online book marketJournal of Interactive Marketing2004
Posselt, T., Gerstner, E. [12]Pre-sale vs. post-sale e-satisfaction: Impact on repurchase intention and overall satisfactionJournal of Interactive Marketing2005
Otim S., Grover, V. [62]An empirical study on Web-based services and customer loyaltyEuropean Journal of Information Systems2006
Yun, Z.-S., Good, L.K. [65]Developing customer loyalty from e-tail store image attributesManaging Service Quality: An International Journal2007
Khalifa, M., Liu, V. [86]Online consumer retention: Contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experienceEuropean Journal of Information Systems2007
Choudhury, V; Karahanna, E [89]The relative advantage of electronic channels: A multidimensional viewMIS Quarterly2008
Khalifa, M; Shen, KN [68]Modelling electronic customer relationship management success: functional and temporal considerationsBehaviour and Information Technology2009
Clegg, B., Melián Alzola L., Padrón Robaina V. [20]The impact of pre-sale and post-sale factors on online purchasing satisfaction: a surveyInternational Journal of Quality and Reliability Management2010
Yongqing, Y., Nan, L., Meijian, L., Shanshan, L. [73]Study on the effects of logistics service quality on consumers’ post-purchase behavior of online shoppingAdvances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences2011
Chen, H. [98]The impact mechanism of consumer-generated comments of shopping sites on consumer trustJournal of Computers2011
Hsin Chang, H., Wang, H.-W. [57]The moderating effect of customer perceived value on online shopping behaviourOnline Information Review2011
Kim, DJ [48]An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and post-expectationInformation Systems and E-business Management2012
Kuo, YF; Wu, CM [51]Satisfaction and post-purchase intentions with service recovery of online shopping websites: Perspectives on perceived justice and emotionsInternational Journal of Information Management2012
Endo S., Yang J., Park J. [75]The investigation on dimensions of e-satisfaction for online shoes retailingJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services2012
Jiang, L; Yang, ZL; Jun, M [67]Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenienceJournal of Service Management2013
Taylor, S.A., Donovan, L.A.N., Ishida, C. [83]Consumer Trust and Satisfaction in the Formation of Consumer Loyalty Intentions in Transactional Exchange: The Case of a Mass Discount RetailerJournal of Relationship Marketing2014
Park, I; Cho, J; Rao, HR [43]The Dynamics of Pre- and Post-purchase Service and Consumer Evaluation of Online Retailers: A Comparative Analysis of Dissonance and Disconfirmation ModelsDecision Sciences2015
Mpinganjira, M. [47]An investigation of customer attitude towards online storesAfrican Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development2016
Lin C., Lekhawipat W. [85]How Customer Expectations Become Adjusted After PurchaseInternational Journal of Electronic Commerce2016
Chen, L; Lu, M; Tu, YB [94]After Auction’s Complete: What Will Buyers Do Next?—A Case Study of Feedback Rating at eBayInternational Journal of E-business Research2017
Qazi A., Tamjidyamcholo A., Raj R.G., Hardaker G., Standing C. [49]Assessing consumers’ satisfaction and expectations through online opinions: Expectation and disconfirmation approachComputers in Human Behavior2017
Nawi N.B.C.,
Al-Mamun A. [63]
Customer satisfaction of online apparel businesses in Malaysia: Point-purchase and post-purchase comparisonInternational Journal of Business Innovation and Research2017
Kumar, A; Anjaly, B [2]How to measure post-purchase customer experience in online retailing? A scale development studyInternational Journal of Retail and Distribution Management2017
Kotni, VVDP [71]Paradigm Shift from Attracting Footfalls for Retail Store to Getting Hits for E-stores: An Evaluation of Decision-making Attributes in E-tailingInternational Journal of Production Economics2017
Xu, X; Zeng, S; He, YJ [74]The influence of e-services on customer online purchasing behavior toward remanufactured productsConsumer willingness to pay across retail channels2017
Tseng, A. [55]Why do online tourists need sellers’ ratings? Exploration of the factors affecting regretful tourist e-satisfactionTourism Management2017
Wu J., Fan S., Zhao J.L. [95]Community engagement and online word of mouth: An empirical investigationInformation and Management2018
Mohapatra S., Sahu K.C. [80]Empirical research on the adoption and diffusion of e-commerce portalsInternational Journal of Business Innovation and Research2018
Kaur, S. [70]Online shopping preferences of consumers—The web experience and purchase patternJIMS8M—The Journal of Indian Management and Strategy2018
Cao, YX; Ajjan, H; Hong, P [50]Post-purchase shipping and customer service experiences in online shopping and their impact on customer satisfaction: An empirical study with comparisonAsia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics2018
Pham, QT; Tran, XP; Misra, S; Maskeliunas, R; Damasevicius, R [72]Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in VietnamSustainability2018
Luo, XQ; Lee, JJ [77]The Effect of Post-Purchase Discount Format on Consumers’ Perception of Loss and Willingness to ReturnJournal of Asian Finance Economics and Business2018
Lin, CH; Wei, YH; Lekhawipat, W [13]Time effect of disconfirmation on online shoppingBehaviour and Information Technology2018
Jacobsen, S. [54]Why did I buy this?: The effect of WOM and online reviews on post purchase attribution for product outcomesJournal of Research in Interactive Marketing2018
Al-Adwan, A.S. [88]Revealing the influential factors driving social commerce adoptionInterdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management2019
Yang, S; Xiong, GY [81]Try It On! Contingency Effects of Virtual Fitting RoomsJournal of Management Information Systems2019
Freitas, A.L.P., De Souza Gomes Dos Santos A.C. [76]Using a multicriteria approach to identify factors that influence e-tailing service qualityInternational Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing2019
Palacios, S., Jun, M. [46]An exploration of online shopping convenience dimensions and their associations with customer satisfactionInternational Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing2020
Iqbal S., Bhatti Z.A., Khan M.N. [82]Assessing e-service quality of B2C sites: a proposed frameworkInternational Journal of Information Technology (Singapore)2020
Gupta, P; Sachan, A; Kumar, R [66]Different stages of the e-service delivery system process: belief-attitude-intention frameworkInternational Journal of Retail and Distribution Management2020
Bi, Y; Kim, I [69]Older Travelers’ E-Loyalty: The Roles of Service Convenience and Social Presence in Travel WebsitesSustainability2020
Shahbaz H., Li Y., Li W. [87]Psychological contract-based Consumer Repurchase behavior on Social commerce platform: An Empirical studyKSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems2020
Javed, MK; Wu, M; Qadeer, T; Manzoor, A; Nadeem, AH; Shouse, RC [24]Role of Online Retailers’ Post-sale Services in Building Relationships and Developing Repurchases: A Comparison-Based Analysis Among Male and Female CustomersFrontiers in Psychology2020
Chen, JW; Ma, Y [52]What constitutes excellent user experience in online consumers’ return services?International Journal of Services Technology and Management2020
Lin, HH; Tseng, TH; Yeh, CH; Liao, YW; Wang, YS [53]What drives customers’ post-purchase price search intention in the context of online price matching guaranteesJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services2020
Purohit, HKS; Deokuje, AS [61]An Empirical Study of Online Consumer Behavior for Apparel and Electronics SegmentBioscience Biotechnology Research Communications2021
Liu Y., Gan W.-X., Zhang Q. [96]Decision-making mechanism of online retailer based on additional online comments of consumersJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services2021
Dospinescu O., Dospinescu N., Bostan I. [64]Determinants of e-commerce satisfaction: a comparative study between Romania and MoldovaKybernetes2021
Tata, SV; Prashar, S; Parsad, C [84]Examining the influence of satisfaction and regret on online shoppers’ post-purchase behaviourBenchmarking—An International Journal 2021
Stöcker, B., Baier, D., Brand, B.M. [14]New insights in online fashion retail returns from a customers’ perspective and their dynamicsJournal of Business Economics2021
Mu, JF; Zhang, JZ [97]Seller marketing capability, brand reputation, and consumer journeys on e-commerce platformsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science2021

References

  1. Verhoef, P.C.; Stephen, A.T.; Kannan, P.K.; Luo, X.; Abhishek, V.; Andrews, M.; Bart, Y.; Datta, H.; Fong, N.; Hoffman, D.L.; et al. Consumer Connectivity in a Complex, Technology-enabled, and Mobile-oriented World with Smart Products. J. Interact. Mark. 2017, 40, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, A.; Anjaly, B. How to measure post-purchase customer experience in online retailing? A scale development study. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2017, 45, 1277–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/871/online-shopping/#dossierKeyfigures (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  4. Verhoef, P.C.; Kannan, P.K.; Inman, J.J. From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing: Introduction to the Special Issue on Multi-Channel Retailing. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jones, C.; Livingstone, N. The ‘online high street’ or the high street online? The implications for the urban retail hierarchy. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2018, 28, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gawor, T.; Hoberg, K. Customers’ valuation of time and convenience in e-fulfillment. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019, 49, 75–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/251666/number-of-digital-buyers-worldwide/ (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  8. Strauss, J.; Frost, R.D. Marketing on the Internet: Principles of On-Line Marketing; Prentice Hall PTR: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Silva, S.C.; Martins, C.C.; Sousa, J.M. Omnichannel approach: Factors affecting consumer acceptance. J. Mark. Channels 2018, 25, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Javed, M.K.; Wu, M. Effects of online retailer after delivery services on repurchase intention: An empirical analysis of customers’ past experience and future confidence with the retailer. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 54, 101942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rowell, J.; Kessler, G.; Berke, R. Five keys to a Web site that’s more than just a pretty face. Med. Mark. Media 1999, 34, 80–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. Posselt, T.; Gerstner, E. Pre-sale vs. Post-sale e-satisfaction: Impact on repurchase intention and overall satisfaction. J. Interact. Mark. 2005, 19, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, C.; Wei, Y.; Lekhawipat, W. Time effect of disconfirmation on online shopping. Behav. Inform. Tech. 2018, 37, 87–101. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1406004?journalCode=tbit20 (accessed on 20 April 2022). [CrossRef]
  14. Stöcker, B.; Baier, D.; Brand, B.M. New insights in online fashion retail returns from a customers’ perspective and their dynamics. J. Bus. Econ. 2021, 91, 1149–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hong, Y.K.; Pavlou, P.A. Product Fit Uncertainty in Online Markets: Nature, Effects, and Antecedents. Inform. Syst. Res. 2014, 25, 328–344. Available online: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.2014.0520 (accessed on 20 April 2022). [CrossRef]
  16. Davari, A.; Iyer, P.; Rokonuzzaman, M. Identifying the determinants of online retail patronage: A perceived-risk perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 33, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, Q.; Pattnaik, C.; Xiao, J.; Voola, R. Cross-national variation in consumers’ retail channel selection in a multichannel environment: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 86, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, M.; Hu, Q.; Wei, H. Interaction of after-sales service provider and contract type in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 193, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, Y.; Gruca, T.S. The influence of pre- and post-purchase service on prices in the online book market. J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alzola, L.M.; Robaina, V.P. The impact of pre-sale and post-sale factors on online purchasing satisfaction: A survey. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2010, 27, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wowak, K.D.; Boone, C.A. So Many Recalls, So Little Research: A Review of the Literature and Road map for Future Research. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2015, 51, 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdulla, H.; Ketzenberg, M.; Abbey, J.D. Taking stock of consumer returns: A review and classification of the literature. J. Oper. Manag. 2019, 65, 560–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lamba, D.; Yadav, D.K.; Barve, A.; Panda, G. Prioritizing barriers in reverse logistics of E-commerce supply chain using fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process. Electron. Commer. Res. 2020, 20, 381–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Javed, M.K.; Wu, M.; Qadeer, T.; Manzoor, A.; Nadeem, A.H.; Shouse, R.C. Role of Online Retailers’ Post-sale Services in Building Relationships and Developing Repurchases: A Comparison-Based Analysis Among Male and Female Customers. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 594132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Paul, J.; Lim, W.M.; O’Cass, A.; Hao, A.W.; Bresciani, S. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, O1–O16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Borba, J.L.G.; De Magalhães, M.R.; Filgueiras, R.S.; Bouzon, M. Barriers in omnichannel retailing returns: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 121–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahsan, K.; Rahman, S. A systematic review of e-tail product returns and an agenda for future research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 137–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Risberg, A. A systematic literature review on e-commerce logistics: Towards an e-commerce and omni-channel decision framework. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2022, 33, 67–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Titiyal, R.; Bhattacharya, S.; Thakkar, J.J. E-fulfillment across product type: A review of literature (2000–2020). Manag. Res. Rev. 2022, 45, 1450–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aghaei Chadegani, A.; Salehi, H.; Yunus, M.M.; Farhadi, H.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, M.; Ale Ebrahim, N. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Soc. Sci. 2013, 9, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chersan, I.C.; Dumitru, V.F.; Gorgan, C.; Gorgan, V. Green public procurement in the academic literature. Amfite. Econ. 2020, 22, 82–101. Available online: https://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2879.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2022). [CrossRef]
  32. Finnegan, C.; Runyan, R.C.; Gonzalez-Padron, T.; Hyun, J. Diversity and Rigor Trends in Retailing Research: Assessment and Guidelines. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2016, 18, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, Z.; Wang, J.; Sun, H.; Liu, Y.; Fan, Z.; Xuan, F. What Factors Influence Online Product Sales? Online Reviews, Review System Curation, Online Promotional Marketing and Seller Guarantees Analysis. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 3920–3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, T.; He, Z.; Zhao, X.; Qu, L. Joint monitoring of post-sales online review processes based on a distribution-free EWMA scheme. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 158, 107372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hwang, Y.; Jeong, J. Electronic commerce and online consumer behavior research: A literature review. Inf. Dev. 2016, 32, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Agatz, N.A.; Fleischmann, M.; van Nunen, J.A. E-fulfillment and multi-channel distribution–A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 187, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fabrizio, C.M.; Kaczam, F.; de Moura, G.L.; da Silva, L.S.C.V.; da Silva, W.V.; da Veiga, C.P. Competitive advantage and dynamic capability in small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2022, 16, 617–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bastian, M.; Heymann, S.; Jacomy, M. Gephi: Um software de código aberto para explorar e manipular redes. ICWSM 2009, 8, 361–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Souza, M.A.R.; Wall, M.L.; Thuler, A.C.D.M.C.; Lowen, I.M.V.; Peres, A.M. O uso do software IRAMUTEQ na análise de dados em pesquisas qualitativas. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP 2018, 52, e03353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L.; Parasuraman, A. The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. J. Mark. 1996, 60, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Malhotra, A. E-S-QUAL multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. J. Serv. Res. 2005, 7, 213–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Park, I.; Cho, J.; Rao, H.R. The effect of pre- and post-service performance on consumer evaluation of online retailers. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 52, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Park, I.; Cho, J.; Rao, H.R. The Dynamics of Pre- and Post-purchase Service and Consumer Evaluation of Online Retailers: A Comparative Analysis of Dissonance and Disconfirmation Models. Decis. Sci. 2015, 46, 1109–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jiang, P.; Rosenbloom, B. Customer intention to return online: Price perception, attribute-level performance, and satisfaction unfolding over time. Eur. J. Mark. 2005, 39, 150–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Burroughs, R.E.; Sabherwal, R. Determinants Of Retail Electronic Purchasing: A Multi-Period Investigation. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2002, 40, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Palacios, S.; Jun, M. An exploration of online shopping convenience dimensions and their associations with customer satisfaction. Int. J. Electron. Mark. Retail. 2020, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mpinganjira, M. An investigation of customer attitude towards online stores. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 2016, 8, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, D.J. An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and post-expectation. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2012, 10, 219–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qazi, A.; Tamjidyamcholo, A.; Raj, R.G.; Hardaker, G.; Standing, C. Assessing consumers’ satisfaction and expectations through online opinions: Expectation and disconfirmation approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 75, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, Y.; Ajjan, H.; Hong, P. Post-purchase shipping and customer service experiences in online shopping and their impact on customer satisfaction: An empirical study with comparison. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Log. 2018, 30, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuo, Y.-F.; Wu, C.-M. Satisfaction and post-purchase intentions with service recovery of online shopping websites: Perspectives on perceived justice and emotions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2012, 32, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, J.; Ma, Y. What constitutes excellent user experience in online consumers’ return services. Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag. 2020, 26, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, H.-H.; Tseng, T.H.; Yeh, C.-H.; Liao, Y.-W.; Wang, Y.-S. What drives customers’ post-purchase price search intention in the context of online price matching guarantees. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 54, 102015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jacobsen, S. Why did I buy this? The effect of WOM and online reviews on post purchase attribution for product outcomes. J. Res. Interac. Mark. 2018, 12, 370–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tseng, A. Why do online tourists need sellers’ ratings? Exploration of the factors affecting regretful tourist e-satisfaction. Tour. Manag. 2017, 59, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ding, D.X.; Hu, P.J.-H.; Sheng, O.R.L. E-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality. J. Bus. Res. 2011, 64, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chang, H.H.; Wang, H. The moderating effect of customer perceived value on online shopping behaviour. Online Inf. Rev. 2011, 35, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Davis-Sramek, B.; Mentzer, J.T.; Stank, T.P. Creating consumer durable retailer customer loyalty through order fulfillment service operations. J. Oper. Manag. 2008, 26, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pham, T.S.H.; Ahammad, M.F. Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2017, 124, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, S.; Chang, T. A descriptive model of online shopping process: Some empirical results. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2003, 14, 556–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Purohit, H.K.S.; Deokule, A.S. An Empirical Study of Online Consumer Behavior for Apparel & Electronics Segment. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2021, 14, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Otim, S.; Grover, V. An empirical study on Web-based services and customer loyalty. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2006, 15, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nawi, N.B.C.; Al Mamun, A. Customer satisfaction of online apparel businesses in Malaysia: Point-purchase and post-purchase comparison. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2017, 12, 386–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dospinescu, O.; Dospinescu, N.; Bostan, I. Determinants of e-commerce satisfaction: A comparative study between Romania and Moldova. Kybernetes 2021, 51, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yun, Z.S.; Good, L.K. Developing customer loyalty from e-tail store image attributes. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2007, 17, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gupta, P.; Sachan, A.; Kumar, R. Different stages of the e-service delivery system process: Belief–attitude–intention framework. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2020, 48, 687–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jiang, L.; Yang, Z.; Jun, M. Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience. J. Serv. Manag. 2013, 24, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khalifa, M.; Shen, K.N. Modelling electronic customer relationship management success: Functional and temporal considerations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2009, 28, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bi, Y.; Kim, I. Older Travelers’ E-Loyalty: The Roles of Service Convenience and Social Presence in Travel Websites. Sustainability 2020, 12, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kaur, S. Online shopping preferences of Consumers-The web experience and purchase pattern. JIMS8M J. Indian Manag. Strat. 2018, 23, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kotni, V.D.P. Paradigm Shift from Attracting Footfalls for Retail Store to Getting Hits for E-stores: An Evaluation of Decision-making Attributes in E-tailing. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2017, 18, 1215–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pham, Q.T.; Tran, X.P.; Misra, S.; Maskeliūnas, R.; Damaševičius, R. Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam. Sustainability 2018, 10, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yongqing, Y.; Nan, L.; Meijian, L.; Shanshan, L. Study on the Effects of Logistics Service Quality on Consumers’ Post-Purchase Behavior of Online Shopping. Int. J. Adv. Inf. Sci. Serv. Sci. 2011, 3, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Xu, X.; Zeng, S.; He, Y. The influence of e-services on customer online purchasing behavior toward remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 187, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Endo, S.; Yang, J.; Park, J. The investigation on dimensions of e-satisfaction for online shoes retailing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2012, 19, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Freitas, A.L.P.; Santos, A.C.D.S.G.D. Using a multicriteria approach to identify factors that influence e-tailing service quality. Int. J. Electron. Mark. Retail. 2019, 10, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Luo, X.; Lee, J.J. The Effect of Post-Purchase Discount Format on Consumers’ Perception of Loss and Willingness to Return. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2018, 5, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wood, S.L. Remote purchase environments: The influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shulman, J.D.; Coughlan, A.T.; Savaskan, R.C. Managing Consumer Returns in a Competitive Environment. Manag. Sci. 2011, 57, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mohapatra, S.; Sahu, K.C. Empirical research on the adoption and diffusion of e-commerce portals. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2018, 15, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, S.; Xiong, G. Try It On! Contingency Effects of Virtual Fitting Rooms. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2019, 36, 789–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Iqbal, S.; Bhatti, Z.A.; Khan, M.N. Assessing e-service quality of B2C sites: A proposed framework. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 2018, 12, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Taylor, S.A.; Donovan, L.A.N.; Ishida, C. Consumer Trust and Satisfaction in the Formation of Consumer Loyalty Intentions in Transactional Exchange: The Case of a Mass Discount Retailer. J. Relatsh. Mark. 2014, 13, 125–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tata, S.V.; Prashar, S.; Parsad, C. Examining the influence of satisfaction and regret on online shoppers’ post-purchase behaviour. Benchmarking Int. J. 2020, 28, 1987–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lin, C.; Lekhawipat, W. How Customer Expectations Become Adjusted After Purchase. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2016, 20, 443–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khalifa, M.; Liu, V. Online consumer retention: Contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2007, 16, 780–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shahbaz, H.; Li, Y.; Li, W. Psychological contract-based Consumer Repurchase behavior On Social commerce platform: An Empirical study. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 2061–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Al-Adwan, A.S. Revealing the Influential Factors Driving Social Commerce Adoption. Interdiscip. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 2019, 14, 295–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Choudhury, V.; Karahanna, E. The Relative Advantage of Electronic Channels: A Multidimensional View. MIS Q. 2008, 32, 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Yi, Y.J.; La, S. What influences the relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intention? Investigating the effects of adjusted expectations and customer loyalty. Psychol. Mark. 2004, 21, 351–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ha, H.Y.; Janda, S.; Muthaly, S.K. A new understanding of satisfaction model in e-re-purchase situation. Eur. J. Mark. 2010, 44, 997–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Zhao, T.Y.; Cui, J.; Hu, J.; Dai, Y.; Zhou, Y. Is Artificial Intelligence Customer Service Satisfactory? Insights Based on Microblog Data and User Interviews. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2022, 25, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Huang, M.-H.; Rust, R.T. Artificial Intelligence in Service. J. Serv. Res. 2018, 21, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, L.; Lu, M.; Tu, Y. After auction’s complete: What will buyers do next?—A case study of feedback rating at eBay. Intern. J. E-Bus. Res. (IJEBR) 2017, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wu, J.; Fan, S.; Zhao, J.L. Community engagement and online word of mouth: An empirical investigation. Inf. Manag. 2018, 55, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, Y.; Gan, W.-X.; Zhang, Q. Decision-making mechanism of online retailer based on additional online comments of consumers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 59, 102389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mu, J.; Zhang, J.Z. Seller marketing capability, brand reputation, and consumer journeys on e-commerce platforms. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2021, 49, 994–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, H. The Impact Mechanism of Consumer-generated Comments of Shopping Sites on Consumer Trust. J. Comput. 2011, 6, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K.P.; Walsh, G.; Gremler, D.D. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 8, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Camargo, B.V.; Justo, A.M. IRAMUTEQ: Um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas Psicol. 2013, 21, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Reinert, M. Alceste une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval. Bullet. Socio. Method. 1990, 26, 24–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Budd, J. A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature. Res. High. Educ. 1988, 28, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lotka, A.J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 1926, 16, 317–323. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203 (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  104. Kalia, P.; Kaur, N.; Singh, T. E-Commerce in India: Evolution and Revolution of Online Retail. In Mobile Commerce: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 736–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhang, X. Investigation of e-commerce in China in a geographical perspective. Growth Chang. 2019, 50, 1062–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lin, Y. E-urbanism: E-commerce, migration, and the transformation of Taobao villages in urban China. Cities 2019, 91, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rejikumar, G.; Asokan-Ajitha, A. Role of impulsiveness in online purchase completion intentions: An empirical study among Indian customers. J. Indian Bus. Res. 2020, 13, 189–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Park, S.; Lee, K. Examining the Impact of E-Commerce Growth on the Spatial Distribution of Fashion and Beauty Stores in Seoul. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Priambodo, I.T.; Sasmoko, S.; Abdinagoro, S.B.; Bandur, A. Role of e-commerce maturity and e-commerce adoption towards e-commerce performance: An evidence from creative industry of Indonesia. Int. J. eBus. eGovern. Stu. 2022, 14, 50–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jarneving, B. Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. J. Inf. 2007, 1, 287–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kessler, M.M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Doc. 1963, 14, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Boyack, K.W.; Klavans, R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 2389–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Soós, S. Age-sensitive bibliographic coupling reflecting the history of science: The case of the Species Problem. Scientometrics 2014, 98, 23–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Elia, S.; Giuffrida, M.; Mariani, M.M.; Bresciani, S. Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhu, W.; Mou, J.; Benyoucef, M. Exploring purchase intention in cross-border E-commerce: A three stage model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sun, M.; Zhao, J. Behavioral Patterns beyond Posting Negative Reviews Online: An Empirical View. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 949–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram summarizing the methodology of the systematic review.
Figure 1. Diagram summarizing the methodology of the systematic review.
Jtaer 18 00025 g001
Figure 2. Annual publications.
Figure 2. Annual publications.
Jtaer 18 00025 g002
Figure 3. Scope of research.
Figure 3. Scope of research.
Jtaer 18 00025 g003
Figure 4. World cloud for each thematic cluster.
Figure 4. World cloud for each thematic cluster.
Jtaer 18 00025 g004aJtaer 18 00025 g004b
Figure 5. Bibliometric indicators.
Figure 5. Bibliometric indicators.
Jtaer 18 00025 g005
Figure 6. Corresponding author’s country.
Figure 6. Corresponding author’s country.
Jtaer 18 00025 g006
Figure 7. Regions where the studies were conducted.
Figure 7. Regions where the studies were conducted.
Jtaer 18 00025 g007
Figure 8. Bibliographic coupling networks [49,50,51,61,62,67,74,76,83,86,87,89,95,97].
Figure 8. Bibliographic coupling networks [49,50,51,61,62,67,74,76,83,86,87,89,95,97].
Jtaer 18 00025 g008
Figure 9. Framework: After-sales Customer Services at the e-commerce post-purchase stage.
Figure 9. Framework: After-sales Customer Services at the e-commerce post-purchase stage.
Jtaer 18 00025 g009
Table 1. Summary of criteria used for the systematic review.
Table 1. Summary of criteria used for the systematic review.
DatabaseStringResult
ScopusTITLE-ABS-KEY ((“after sale *” OR “after-sale *” OR “aftersale *” OR “post purchase” OR “post-purchase” OR “post sale *” OR “post-sale *”) AND (“digital commerce” OR “ecommerce” OR “e-commerce” OR “electronic commerce” OR “digital sale *” OR “digital retail *” OR “e-retail *” OR “online retail *” OR “online shopping” OR “e-tail *” OR “electronic retail *” OR “e-shopping” OR “eshopping” OR “electronic shopping” OR “internet retail channel” OR “e-procurement” OR “web retail *” OR “electronic marketplace”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”))177
Web of ScienceTS = ((“after sale *” OR “after-sale *” OR “aftersale *” OR “post purchase” OR “post-purchase” OR “post sale *” OR “post-sale *”) AND (“digital commerce” OR “ecommerce” OR “e-commerce” OR “electronic commerce” OR “digital sale *” OR “digital retail *” OR “e-retail *” OR “online retail *” OR “online shopping” OR “e-tail *” OR “electronic retail *” OR “e-shopping” OR “eshopping” OR “electronic shopping” OR “internet retail channel” OR “e-procurement” OR “web retail *” OR “electronic marketplace”))115
* The data were collected on 12 February 2022.
Table 2. Typology analysis of the textual corpus.
Table 2. Typology analysis of the textual corpus.
Class 1: E-commerce
Business
Class 2: Business and
Technology
Class 3: Post-Purchase
Behavior
Class 4: After-sales
Attributes
Classification: 17.49%Classification: 18.58%Classification: 32.79%Classification: 31.15%
WordChi2p-ValueWordChi2p-ValueWordChi2p-ValueWordChi2p-Value
community24.260.00000electronic21.690.00000satisfaction20.970.00000return20.240.00001
seller23.850.00000internet17.190.00003mode20.190.00001literature18.490.00002
platform23.480.00000display13.370.00026stage14.420.00015attribute17.080.00004
brand15.870.00007price13.050.00030repurchase intention14.420.00015store16.310.00005
information14.850.00012purchase12.460.00042pre-purchase12.370.00044order11.360.00075
outcome14.390.00015perception11.510.00069disconfirmation10.540.00117country11.360.00075
feedback14.390.00015product10.000.00157emotion10.540.00117China11.360.00075
reputation14.390.00015remanufactured8.610.00335empirically10.540.00117track11.360.00075
capability14.390.00015buy8.610.00335expectation10.290.00134ship11.360.00075
eBay14.390.00015commerce8.520.00351recovery8.380.00379e-tail9.040.00264
review11.140.00084usefulness7.160.00747confirmation8.380.00379maintenance9.040.00264
offer10.400.00126strategy7.160.00747relationship6.720.00951instrument9.040.00264
potential10.400.00126comments5.830.01575loyalty6.690.00970fashion9.040.00264
commerce9.640.00190technology5.830.01575expectancy6.250.01240Taiwan7.880.00501
medium9.380.00220social5.590.01808post-purchase intention6.250.01240company7.880.00501
behavior8.380.00379discount4.660.03083consumer satisfaction6.250.01240manager7.880.00501
e-commerce6.160.01305adoption4.660.03083post-purchase5.640.01753support7.550.00599
regretful5.110.02375vendor4.660.03083framework5.200.02259exchange7.500.00616
journey5.110.02375construct4.660.03083habit5.200.02259post-sales services6.740.00942
offering5.110.02375sustainable4.660.03083convenience5.050.02457scientific6.740.00942
firm4.550.03301operation4.660.03083process4.380.03636e-retailer5.720.01677
retailer4.130.04216apparel4.660.03083 gap5.720.01677
Table 3. Major publishing journals.
Table 3. Major publishing journals.
JournalRankingFrequency
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services13
Behaviour and Information Technology22
European Journal of Information Systems32
International Journal of Business Innovation and Research42
International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing52
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management62
Journal of Interactive Marketing72
Sustainability82
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferraz, R.M.; da Veiga, C.P.; da Veiga, C.R.P.; Furquim, T.S.G.; da Silva, W.V. After-Sales Attributes in E-Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 475-500. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010025

AMA Style

Ferraz RM, da Veiga CP, da Veiga CRP, Furquim TSG, da Silva WV. After-Sales Attributes in E-Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2023; 18(1):475-500. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferraz, Rodolfo Magalhães, Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, Cassia Rita Pereira da Veiga, Thales Stevan Guedes Furquim, and Wesley Vieira da Silva. 2023. "After-Sales Attributes in E-Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 18, no. 1: 475-500. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop